Safety and Tolerability of Oral Lisdexamfetamine in Adults with Methamphetamine Dependence: a Phase-2 Dose-Escalation­ Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safety and Tolerability of Oral Lisdexamfetamine in Adults with Methamphetamine Dependence: a Phase-2 Dose-Escalation­ Study Open access Original research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044696 on 18 May 2021. Downloaded from Safety and tolerability of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence: a phase-2 dose-escalation study Nadine Ezard ,1,2,3,4 Brendan Clifford,1,5 Adrian Dunlop,4,6,7 Raimondo Bruno,8 Andrew Carr,9 Zhixin Liu ,9,10 Krista J Siefried ,1,2,3 Nicholas Lintzeris4,11,12 To cite: Ezard N, Clifford B, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Dunlop A, et al. Safety Objectives To examine the safety of an agonist- type and tolerability of oral treatment, lisdexamfetamine (LDX), at 250 mg/day among ► This study is the first to demonstrate the safe- lisdexamfetamine in adults adults with methamphetamine (MA) dependence. with methamphetamine ty, tolerability and acceptability of higher doses of Design A dose- escalating, phase-2, open- label, single- dependence: a phase-2 dose- lisdexamfetamine (LDX) in people with metham- group study of oral LDX at two Australian drug treatment escalation study. BMJ Open phetamine (MA) dependence than those currently services. 2021;11:e044696. doi:10.1136/ approved in the treatment attention deficit/hyperac- Setting The study was conducted at two Australian bmjopen-2020-044696 tivity disorder and binge eating disorder. stimulant use disorder treatment clinics. ► There are currently no pharmacotherapies approved ► Prepublication history for Participants There were 16 participants: at least 18 years this paper is available online. for the treatment of MA dependence, research into old, MA dependent for at least the preceding 2 years using To view these files, please visit medication options could provide a complementary ICD-10 criteria, reporting use of MA on at least 14 of the the journal online (http:// dx. doi. adjunct to the success of psychosocial therapies. preceding 28 days. org/ 10. 1136/ bmjopen- 2020- ► This pilot study demonstrated the safety and tolera- Interventions Daily, supervised LDX of 100–250 mg, 044696). bility of LDX in this population, which may encourage single- blinded to dose, ascending- descending regimen further larger scale trials of LDX as a pharmacother- Received 14 September 2020 over 8 weeks (100–250 mg over 4 weeks; followed by 4- apy for MA dependence. Revised 12 April 2021 week dose reduction regimen, 250–100 mg). Participants Accepted 16 April 2021 ► The small sample size and short duration of treat- were followed through to week 12. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ment is typical of pilot safety studies, limiting the Outcomes Primary outcomes were safety, drug tolerability clinical extrapolation of findings. and regimen completion at the end of week 4. Participants ► The study is not powered to explore efficacy of LDX were followed to week 12. Secondary outcomes and this precludes more sophisticated statistical included: change in MA use; craving; withdrawal; analysis. severity of dependence; risk behaviour; change in other substance use; medication acceptability; potential for non- prescription use; adherence and neurocognitive functioning. second most commonly used illicit drug class. Results Fourteen of 16 participants (87.5%) completed An estimated 29 million people used amphet- on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 1 escalation to 250 mg/day. Two participants withdrew amines in 2019, with 7 million estimated to 2 from the trial in the first week: one relocated away from be dependent. Poor health outcomes are the study site, the other self- withdrew due to a possible, seen particularly among people who use MA known side effect of LDX (agitation). There was one several times a week,3 including psychosis, serious adverse event of suicidal ideation which resolved. depression, anxiety, bloodborne virus trans- All other adverse events were mild or moderate in severity mission, sexually transmitted infections, and and known side effects of LDX. No participant was cardio/cerebral vascular events.4 5 withdrawn due to adverse events. MA use decreased from Currently, treatment for MA dependence is a median of 21 days (IQR: 16–23) to 13 days (IQR: 11–17) © Author(s) (or their based on psychological therapies such as cogni- over the 4- week escalation period (p=0.013). employer(s)) 2021. Re- use tive–behavioural therapy.6 7 Psychological ther- permitted under CC BY-NC. No Conclusions LDX at a dose of up to 250 mg/day was safe commercial re- use. See rights and well tolerated by study participants, warranting larger apies are labour- intensive and predicated on and permissions. Published by trials as a pharmacotherapy for MA dependence. high levels of attendance and participation by BMJ. Trial registration number ACTRN12615000391572. patients. No pharmacotherapy has yet achieved For numbered affiliations see comparable efficacy, and there are as yet none end of article. licensed for the treatment of MA dependence. 8 Correspondence to INTRODUCTION Though agonist therapies show some promise, Dr Nadine Ezard; Amphetamine- type stimulants, including their efficacy for treatment of MA dependence nadine. ezard@ svha. org. au methamphetamine (MA), make up the is uncertain, with one systematic review showing Ezard N, et al. BMJ Open 2021;11:e044696. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044696 1 Open access BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044696 on 18 May 2021. Downloaded from no benefit over placebo, although limitations in retention Recruitment and enrolment and power of published studies were noted.9 Dexamphet- Notices were displayed at clinics at both sites, as well as amine, an MA agonist, has similar neurochemical and at other drug and alcohol services, associated community behavioural effects to MA,10 and has been used off- label for organisations, and local general practice clinics. Inter- both amphetamine and MA dependence in the UK11 12 and ested individuals either approached or were referred Australia.13 to a research nurse who undertook a standardised Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is a pharmacologically inac- prescreening. If basic inclusion criteria and no exclu- tive prodrug of dexamphetamine approved for the treat- sion criteria were met, potential participants attended a ment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening visit with a site principal investigator. in Australia, Brazil (in children only), Canada, several Euro- pean countries, the UK and the USA14 and more recently Participants for binge eating disorder (BED) in Australia and the USA. Eligible participants were at least 18 years of age who Potential advantages of LDX over immediate release dexam- had been dependent on MA for at least the preceding phetamine include once- daily dosing, a slower onset, lower 2 years, determined by an addiction medicine physician peak concentration, longer duration of action and lower (AD and NE) using International Statistical Classifica- abuse potential.15 LDX presents a candidate pharmaco- tion of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revi- 21 therapy for MA dependence. sion (ICD-10) criteria. Inclusion additionally required There are no clinical trial data on the effectiveness of reported use of MA on 14 days or more of the previous LDX for the treatment of MA dependence. Chronic use of 28 days at the time of screening, confirmed by two urine high doses of MA may lead to physiological adaptation so samples positive for MA 1 week apart. Patients who had that a dose higher than the licenced therapeutic range of used dexamphetamine in the previous 4 weeks were medication is required.9 For the treatment of ADHD and excluded, as were those with known sensitivity or previous BED in stimulant- naïve populations, LDX is licensed for adverse reaction to LDX or prescribed drugs which may doses ranging from 30 to 70 mg/day. A previous study of interact with LDX (venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, mono- dexamphetamine has trialled doses up to 110 mg for this amine oxidase inhibitors), known contraindications to 16 LDX (severe and symptomatic peripheral vascular disease population without serious adverse events (SAEs), which or Raynaud’s phenomenon, significant prior or symptom- is approximate to 275 mg of LDX using a mole weight atic cardiovascular disease, moderate to severe hyperten- equivalent of 100 mg LDX to 40 mg dexamphetamine.17 sion, glaucoma, phaeochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, The highest dose for which safety data of LDX are avail- motor and phonic tics, Tourette’s syndrome, high suicide able is 250 mg/day, equivalent to 100 mg dexamphetamine, risk, voicing suicidal ideation, active psychosis, severe tolerated in a safety and pharmacokinetic study of LDX in agitation or unstable use of alcohol or drugs other than http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ non- MA dependent volunteers18 and in participants with MA as assessed by a specialist in addiction medicine22). clinically stable schizophrenia adherent to antipsychotic Patients with well- controlled mild to moderate hyperten- pharmacotherapy.19 sion on a single antihypertensive agent were permitted, This study aimed to determine the safety of LDX in people and those with a history of psychosis were permitted with MA dependence, at doses higher than those currently on review by a psychiatrist. Pregnant or breastfeeding approved for the treatment of ADHD and BED. The primary women and women not willing to avoid becoming preg- objectives of the study were to describe the safety, tolerability nant during the study were also excluded. and regimen completion of ascending doses of LDX in on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. adults with MA dependence. Secondary objectives included Study procedures measures of efficacy, drug- liking and neurocognition. At the screening visit, informed consent was obtained as well as a detailed medical and substance use history, physical and mental state examinations, an ECG and a urine human chorionic gonadotrophin test (for women METHODS of childbearing potential) to verify eligibility. Trial design All participants were commenced on a dose escala- A phase-2, open- label, single- group trial was undertaken tion regimen of supervised daily dispensing of ascending at two stimulant use disorder treatment outpatient clinics 20 doses of LDX from 100 to 250 mg over 4 weeks, followed in New South Wales, Australia.
Recommended publications
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulant and Related Medications: US Food and Drug
    Stimulant and Related Medications: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults The therapeutic dosing recommendations for stimulant and related medications are based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling. Nevertheless, the dosing regimen is adjusted according to a patient’s individual response to pharmacotherapy. The FDA-approved dosages and indications for the use of stimulant and related medications in adults are provided in this table. All medication doses listed are for oral administration. Information on the generic availability of the stimulant and related medications can be found by searching the Electronic Orange Book at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm on the FDA website. Generic Medication Indication Dosing Information Other Information Availability amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Initial dose: May increase daily dose by 5 mg at Yes mixed salts[1] 5 mg once or twice a day; weekly intervals until optimal response Maximum dose: 40 mg per day is achieved. Only in rare cases will it be necessary to exceed a total of 40 mg per day. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine narcolepsy Initial dose: 10 mg per day; May increase daily dose by 10 mg at Yes mixed salts Usual dose: weekly intervals until optimal response 5 mg to 60 mg per day is achieved. Take first dose in divided doses upon awakening. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Recommended dose: Patients switching from regular-release Yes mixed salts ER*[2] 20 mg once a day amphetamine/dextroamphetamine mixed salts may take the same total daily dose once a day. armodafinil[3] narcolepsy Recommended dose: Take as a single dose in the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Established Aggregate Production Quotas for Schedule I and II
    59980 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 190 / Monday, October 1, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE for Schedule I and II Controlled information, DEA has determined that Substances and Proposed Assessment of adjustments to the proposed aggregate Drug Enforcement Administration Annual Needs for the List I Chemicals production quotas and assessment of [Docket No. DEA–365] Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and annual needs for 3,4-methylenedioxy-N- Phenylpropanolamine for 2013,’’ was methylcathinone (methylone), Established Aggregate Production published in the Federal Register (77 3,4,methylenedioxypyrovalerone Quotas for Schedule I and II Controlled FR 46519). That notice proposed the (MDPV), 4-methyl-N-methylcathinone Substances and Established 2013 aggregate production quotas for (mephedrone), N-benzylpiperazine, Assessment of Annual Needs for the each basic class of controlled substance amphetamine (for conversion), List I Chemicals Ephedrine, listed in schedules I and II and the 2013 amphetamine (for sale), hydrocodone Pseudoephedrine, and assessment of annual needs for the list (for sale), hydromorphone, Phenylpropanolamine for 2013 I chemicals ephedrine, lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, pseudoephedrine, and morphine (for sale), oxycodone (for AGENCY: Drug Enforcement phenylpropanolamine. All interested sale), oxymorphone (for conversion), Administration (DEA), Department of persons were invited to comment on or remifentanil, sufentanil, tapentadol, Justice. object to the proposed aggregate ephedrine (for conversion), ephedrine ACTION:
    [Show full text]
  • A Dose-Escalating, Phase-2 Study of Oral Lisdexamfetamine
    Ezard et al. BMC Psychiatry (2016) 16:428 DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1141-x STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Study protocol: a dose-escalating, phase-2 study of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence Nadine Ezard1,2, Adrian Dunlop3, Brendan Clifford1* , Raimondo Bruno4, Andrew Carr5, Alexandra Bissaker1 and Nicholas Lintzeris6,7 Abstract Background: The treatment of methamphetamine dependence is a continuing global health problem. Agonist type pharmacotherapies have been used successfully to treat opioid and nicotine dependence and are being studied for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. One potential candidate is lisdexamfetamine, a pro-drug for dexamphetamine, which has a longer lasting therapeutic action with a lowered abuse potential. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of lisdexamfetamine in this population at doses higher than those currently approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or binge eating disorder. Methods/design: This is a phase 2 dose escalation study of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Twenty individuals seeking treatment for methamphetamine dependence will be recruited at two Australian drug and alcohol services. All participants will undergo a single-blinded ascending-descending dose regime of 100 to 250 mg lisdexamfetamine, dispensed daily on site, over an 8-week period. Participants will be offered counselling as standard care. For the primary objectives the outcome variables will be adverse events monitoring, drug tolerability and regimen completion. Secondary outcomes will be changes in methamphetamine use, craving, withdrawal, severity of dependence, risk behaviour and other substance use. Medication acceptability, potential for non-prescription use, adherence and changes in neurocognition will also be measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH VYVANSE®* lisdexamfetamine dimesylate Capsules: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg and 70 mg Chewable Tablets: 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg and 60 mg Central Nervous System Stimulant Takeda Canada Inc. Date of Preparation: 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3800 19 February 2009 Toronto, Ontario M5H 4E3 Date of Revision: July 21, 2020 Submission Control No.: 240669 *VYVANSE® and the VYVANSE Logo are registered trademarks of Shire LLC, a Takeda company. Takeda and the Takeda Logo are trademarks of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, used under license. © 2020 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. All rights reserved. Pa ge 1 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .................................................... 3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ........................................................................ 3 CONTRAINDICATIONS ............................................................................................ 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ............................................................................ 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS........................................................................................... 12 DRUG INTERACTIONS ........................................................................................... 23 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................ 25 OVERDOSAGE .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphetamine Use Among Workers with Severe Hyperthermia
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Notes from the Field Amphetamine Use Among Workers with Severe National Weather Service observation stations, the maximum Hyperthermia — Eight States, 2010–2019 outdoor heat index (a metric that combines temperature and Andrew S. Karasick, MD1,2; Richard J. Thomas, MD1; relative humidity into a single number that represents how hot Dawn L. Cannon, MD1; Kathleen M. Fagan, MD1; Patricia A. Bray, MD1; the conditions feel to humans) ranged from 86°F to 107°F 1 1 Michael J. Hodgson, MD ; Aaron W. Tustin, MD (median = 97°F) on the days of the nine incidents. Seven of the nine workers died, and two survived life-threat- Workers can develop hyperthermia when core body tem- ening illnesses. Peak body temperature ranged from 103°F to perature rises because of heat stress (environmental heat plus 110.6°F (39.4°C to 43.7°C) in eight workers with confirmed metabolic heat from physical activity) (1). Amphetamines are severe hyperthermia. In one fatality with no premortem body central nervous system stimulants that can induce hyperthermia temperature measurement, the medical examiner suspected independently or in combination with other risk factors (2). that hyperthermia was a significant contributing condition, During 2010–2016, the Directorate of Technical Support and based upon the circumstances (i.e., death occurred in a hot Emergency Management’s Office of Occupational Medicine environment after strenuous activity on a hot day) and lack and Nursing (OOMN), at the Occupational Safety and Health of anatomic evidence of an alternative cause of death (e.g., Administration (OSHA), identified three workers with fatal myocardial infarction).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy Prior Authorization Guideline 1. Criteria
    Harvard Pilgrim Health Care – Pharmacy Prior Authorization Guideline Guideline Name ADHD Medications: Adderall (amphetamine-dextroamphetamine mixed salts), Adderall XR (amphetamine-dextroamphetamine mixed salts extended-release), Adzenys ER (amphetamine), Adzenys XR-ODT (amphetamine), Aptensio XR (methylphenidate), amphetamine, amphetamine-dextroamphetamine mixed salts, amphetamine-dextroamphetamine mixed salts extended-release, Concerta (methylphenidate), Cotempla-XR ODT (methylphenidate), Daytrana (methylphenidate), Desoxyn (methamphetamine), Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine), dexmethylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate extended- release, dextroamphetamine, dextroamphetamine extended-release, dextroamphetamine oral solution, Dyanavel XR (amphetamine), Evekeo (amphetamine), Focalin (dexmethylphenidate), Focalin XR (dexmethylphenidate), Jornay PM (methylphenidate), Metadate ER (methylphenidate), methamphetamine, Methylin oral solution (methylphenidate), methylphenidate, methylphenidate chewable tablets, methylphenidate extended-release, methylphenidate extended-release (CD), methylphenidate extended-release (LA), methylphenidate extended- release OSM, methylphenidate oral solution, Mydayis (amphetamine- dextroamphetamine), Procentra (dextroamphetamine), Quillivant XR (methylphenidate), Quillichew ER (methylphenidate), Relexxii (methylphenidate), Ritalin (methylphenidate), Ritalin LA (methylphenidate), Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine), and Zenzedi (dextroamphetamine) 1. Criteria Product Name: Brand Adderall, Generic amphetamine-dextroamphetamine mixed
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0202317 A1 Rau Et Al
    US 20150202317A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0202317 A1 Rau et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 23, 2015 (54) DIPEPTDE-BASED PRODRUG LINKERS Publication Classification FOR ALPHATIC AMNE-CONTAINING DRUGS (51) Int. Cl. A647/48 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: Ascendis Pharma A/S, Hellerup (DK) A638/26 (2006.01) A6M5/9 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Harald Rau, Heidelberg (DE); Torben A 6LX3/553 (2006.01) Le?mann, Neustadt an der Weinstrasse (52) U.S. Cl. (DE) CPC ......... A61K 47/48338 (2013.01); A61 K3I/553 (2013.01); A61 K38/26 (2013.01); A61 K (21) Appl. No.: 14/674,928 47/48215 (2013.01); A61M 5/19 (2013.01) (22) Filed: Mar. 31, 2015 (57) ABSTRACT The present invention relates to a prodrug or a pharmaceuti Related U.S. Application Data cally acceptable salt thereof, comprising a drug linker conju (63) Continuation of application No. 13/574,092, filed on gate D-L, wherein D being a biologically active moiety con Oct. 15, 2012, filed as application No. PCT/EP2011/ taining an aliphatic amine group is conjugated to one or more 050821 on Jan. 21, 2011. polymeric carriers via dipeptide-containing linkers L. Such carrier-linked prodrugs achieve drug releases with therapeu (30) Foreign Application Priority Data tically useful half-lives. The invention also relates to pharma ceutical compositions comprising said prodrugs and their use Jan. 22, 2010 (EP) ................................ 10 151564.1 as medicaments. US 2015/0202317 A1 Jul. 23, 2015 DIPEPTDE-BASED PRODRUG LINKERS 0007 Alternatively, the drugs may be conjugated to a car FOR ALPHATIC AMNE-CONTAINING rier through permanent covalent bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • ATC) Codes and Drug Identification Numbers (Dins
    Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Codes and Drug Identification Numbers (DINs) of Drugs in the Drug Program Information Network (DPIN) Used to Define Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Manitoba Children from 2000/01 to 2009/10 DIN ATC Code Equivalent Generic Product Name Product Description Ingredients AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (1.25 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (1.25 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (1.25 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE 2248808 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR (1.25 MG) AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (2.5 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (2.5 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (2.5 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE (2.5 2248809 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR MG) AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (3.75 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (3.75 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (3.75 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE 2248810 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR (3.75 MG) AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (5 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (5 2248811 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (5 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE (5 MG) AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (6.25 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (6.25 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (6.25 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE 2248812 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR (6.25 MG) AMPHETAMINE ASPARTATE MONOHYDRATE (7.5 MG)/AMPHETAMINE SULFATE (7.5 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SACCHARATE (7.5 MG)/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE (7.5 2248813 N06BA01 MIXED SALT AMPHETAMINE ADDERALL XR MG) 1924516 N06BA02 DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE DEXEDRINE DEXTROAMPHETAMINE
    [Show full text]
  • The Pharmacology of an Agonist Medication to Treat Stimulant Use Disorder
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2017 The Pharmacology of an Agonist Medication to Treat Stimulant Use Disorder Amy Johnson johnsonar24 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd © Amy Johnson Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5177 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Amy R. Johnson 2017 All Rights Reserved The Pharmacology of an Agonist Medication to Treat Stimulant Use Disorder A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University by Amy R. Johnson Bachelor of Science, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire, 2013 Advisor: S. Stevens Negus, PhD Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA November, 2017 Acknowledgements Thank you to all the people who made this dissertation possible. I would like to thank my family for their support and belief in me. Many thanks to my dissertation advisor, Steve Negus, for his guidance, knowledge, patience, and encouragement. Thank you to Katherine Nicholson and Matthew Banks, each of whom guided me through a different procedure through the course of my research and served on my committee. Thanks to my remaining committee members, Lori Keyser-Marcus and Jose Eltit, for their time and commitment to my project. Thank you to my entire committee for helping to develop and mold me as a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2018 Stimulant Overdose Surveillance Preliminary Report
    Stimulant Overdose Surveillance Preliminary Report Georgia 2016-2018 Drug Surveillance Unit Epidemiology Section Georgia Department of Public Health https://dph.georgia.gov/drug-overdose-surveillance-unit Stimulant Overdose Surveillance Report, Georgia, 2018 / Page 1 Stimulant Overdose Surveillance, Georgia, 2018 The purpose of this report is to describe fatal (mortality) and nonfatal (morbidity) stimulant-involved hospitalizations and deaths in Georgia during 2016, 2017, and 2018, including those involving prescription stimulants (e.g. Adderall, Ritalin, etc.), and illicit stimulants (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamine, etc.). Stimulant overdose data was analyzed by the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) Epidemiology Program, Drug Surveillance Unit, using Georgia hospital discharge inpatient and emergency department (ED) visit data, and DPH Vital Records death data. Key Findings Stimulant-involved morbidity and mortality is increasing in Georgia. Mortality • From 2016 to 2018, overdose deaths involving stimulants increased by 44%, from 487 to 703 deaths. • From 2017 to 2018, overdose deaths involving stimulants increased by 11%, from 631 to 703 deaths. • In 2018, amphetamines were involved in more deaths than any other stimulant. • White persons were 1.6 times more likely to die from a drug overdose involving stimulants and 5.5 times more likely to die from a drug overdose involving amphetamines than Black persons, yet Black persons were 1.5 times more likely than white persons to die from a drug overdose involving cocaine. • Males aged 25-64 years died more frequently from stimulant-involved overdose than males in any other age category and females of all age categories. Males aged 35-44 years had the highest stimulant-related death rate.
    [Show full text]
  • DRUGS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING MIBG UPTAKE Rev. 26 Oct 2009
    DRUGS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING MIBG UPTAKE rev. 26 Oct 2009 EXCLUDED MEDICATIONS DUE TO DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH ULTRATRACE I-131-MIBG Drug Class Generic Drug Name Within Class Branded Name Checked Cocaine Cocaine □ Dexmethylphenidate Focalin, Focalin XR □ CNS Stimulants (Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor) Methylphenidate Concerta, Metadate CD, Metadate ER, Methylin, Methylin ER, Ritalin, Ritalin LA, □ Ritalin-SR, Daytrana benzphetamine Didrex □ Diethylpropion Tenuate, Tenuate Dospan □ Phendimetrazine Adipost, Anorex-SR, Appecon, Bontril PDM, Bontril Slow Release, Melfiat, Obezine, CNS Stimulants (Norepinephrine and Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitor) □ Phendiet, Plegine, Prelu-2, Statobex Phenteramine Adipex-P, Ionamin, Obenix, Oby-Cap, Teramine, Zantryl □ Sibutramine Meridia □ Isocarboxazid Marplan □ Linezolid Zyvox □ Phenelzine Nardil □ Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors selegiline (MAOa at doses > 15 mg qd) Eldepryl, Zelapar, Carbex, Atapryl, Jumex, Selgene, Emsam □ Tranylcypromine Parnate □ Reserpine Generic only. No brands available. Central Monoamine Depleting Agent □ labetolol Non-select Beta Adrenergic Blocking Agents Normodyne, Trandate □ Opiod Analagesic Tramadol Ultram, Ultram ER □ Pseudoephedrine Chlor Trimeton Nasal Decongestant, Contac Cold, Drixoral Decongestant Non- Drowsy, Elixsure Decongestant, Entex, Genaphed, Kid Kare Drops, Nasofed, Sympathomimetics : Direct Alpha 1 Agonist (found in cough/cold preps) Seudotabs, Silfedrine, Sudafed, Sudodrin, SudoGest, Suphedrin, Triaminic Softchews □ Allergy Congestion, Unifed amphetamine (various
    [Show full text]