DOCSLIB.ORG

Kelly Township Board of Supervisors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kelly Township Board of Supervisors KELLY TOWNSHIP 1992 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE REPORT Kelly Township Board of Supervisors Joseph H. Hoffman Chairman William W. Haas Dallas A. Walter Vice-chairman Secretary Kelly Township Planning Commission Nancy Hazlinsky Chairperson Chia-Ching Chang Pat Hughes Vi ce-Chairm an Secretary David Hackenberg David Hassenplug Edward Meslener John Pawling Steven Ranck Don a 1d Wen ner TABLE OF CONTENTS I Preface ........ .............................................. Page 1 I Background: Past Views on Kelly Township ............................ Page 2 Foreground: Present Views on Kelly Township .......................... Page 4 Introduction ................................................... Page 6 I Existing Conditions .............................................. Page 7 Existing Land Use .......................................... Page 8 I Existing Land Use Summary .................................. Page 14 The Zoning Ordinance ........................................ Page 15 1 Zoning Ordinance Summary ................................... Page 17 Transportation ............................................. Page 18 I Water and Sewer ............................................ Page 21 Floodplain ................................................. Page 23 Prime Farmland ............................................ Page 25 I Population and Housing ...................................... Page 25 TheEconomy ............................................... Pa ge 32 1 Findings and Conclusions ......................................... Page 33 I Community Development Objectives ................................. Page 38 Community Development Goals ..................................... Page 40 I The Future Land Use and Transportation Plan ......................... Page 45 Compatibility Statement .......................................... Page 50 B Action Plan .................................................... Page 51 I Epilogue ...................................................... Page 52 Appendix One .................................................. Page 53 I Appendix Two .................................................. Page 64 Appendix Three ................................................. Page 6i Appendix Four .................................................. Page 76 I Appendix Five ............ CHARTS AND MAPS 1993 Existing Land Use Map. .Page 9 Chart One (Land Use Data Comparisons: 1966 1974 1991). Page 10 Chart Two (Land Use Data Comparisons: 1966 1991). Page 11 Chart Three (Land Use Data Comparisons: 1974 1991). .Page 12 Chart Four (Existing Zoning Ordinance: Classification of Land) . Page 16 1993 Existing Water and Sewer Service Areas Map . Page 22 1993 Generalized Soils and Floodplain Map . Page 24 Chart Five (Kelly Township Population). Page 26 Chart Six (Total Number of Housing Units). Page 28 Chart Seven (Total Number of Occupied Housing Units). Page 29 Chart Eight (Housing Units By Type: Occupied and Vacant). Page 30 Chart Nine (Number and Percentage of Housing Units By Type: Occupied and Vacant). Page 31 1993 Future Land Use and Transportation Plan Map. Page 46 Chart Ten (Future Land Use Plan: Acreage and Percent of Township Land Area) . Page 47 I PREFACE i Kelly Township . originally a part of White Deer Township . was established in 1823, and is 17.1 square miles in size. Having a population of 2,619 persons in 1990 (excluding the inmate population of the Northeast Regional Federal Penitentiary), Kelly Township is governed by a three member Board of Supervisors. A nine member Planning Commission is also in place to assist the Kelly Township Board of Supervisors in their decision-making responsibilities concerning land use, transportation, and other factors influencing the future of Kelly Township, such as the need for . and . the location of recreational facilities. The Planning Commission, during the course of deliberating its recommendations to the Board of Supervisors with regard to matters of this nature, relies heavily on the Township's "comprehensive plan". The current plan for Kelly Township was issued in 1975. In 1991, the Board of Supervisors, in conjunction with the Planning Commission, decided that the Township's 1975 Comprehensive Plan should be updated. This decision was based on two factors. First, a period of 16 years had elapsed since the 1975 Plan was prepared, and both the Supervisors and the Commission saw a need to re-review the Objectives set forth in the Plan to guide Kelly Township's future growth, while providing for the continued well-being of the Township. Second, the law in Pennsylvania dealing with comprehensive planning was modified several times since the 1975 Plan was adopted. Significant revisions to this law . known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code . became effective on February 21, 1989. Thus, in November of 1991, the Kelly Township Board of Supervisors retained the planning consulting firm of McCamant & Canan to prepare this document - the "2992 Comprehensive PZan Update Report" for Kelly Township. McCamant & Canan were advised by the Board of Supervisors to work closely with the Planning Commission while developing this Report . and . were requested to "involve the public" in order to assure that this document reflects the 1992 views of the residents of Kelly Township. "Citizen participation" has been a crucial factor in McCamant & Canan's development of this Update Report. Kelly Township's residents, elected officials, and appointed officials have contributed the "key" elements contained in the conclusions and recommendations of this Report . the key elements being their "views" on what type of community Kelly Township should be in the future. McCamant & Canan's role was to find the means to have the community comprising Kelly Township articulate their views, so that these views could be translated into sound conclusions . and. in turn, recommendations for future action. This, then, is "your" Plan. It is with pleasure that we submit this 1992 Comprehensive PZan Update Report to the Board of Supervisors, the Planning Commission, and the residents of Kelly Township on this 21st day of June, 1993. Respectful 1y Submitted, A BACKGROUND: PAST VIEWS ON KELLY TOWNSHIP Comprehensive Planning is not new to Kelly Township . in fact, today's Township residents enjoy many benefits which are the result of prior planning efforts. Examples of these benefits include the preservation of large areas of farmland, a zoning ordinance regulating the use of land, and the retention of Kelly Township's overall "quality of life". Kelly Township, along with Gregg and White Deer Townships, published a joint comprehensive plan in 1967, which set forth six Community Development Objectives for the area covered by these three municipalities. The trust of these Objectives, as they apply to Kelly Township, follows: Preserve the Township's rural character by locating development, which is "urban" in nature, along the eastern and southeastern portions of Kelly Township . and . preserve the agricultural lands in the balance of the Township. Establish attractive, well-designed, low-density residential areas . i.e., neighborhoods . rather than "strung-out" or ribbon-type residential developments. Encourage industrial development along the Route 15 corridor where the topography is suitable . and . where adequate transportation facilities are available. Concentrate commercial development in "centers" . instead of allowing the strip-type commercialism occurring along Route 15. Develop a full range of year-round, public and commercial recreational facilities, which serve the Township's population . and . which are equipped to service all segments of that population. Provide adequate water and sewer facilities to serve the more intensely developed areas of the Township. These 1967 Community Development Objectives for the Township . while 25 years old in 1992 . remain appropriate in light of what today's Township residents are saying about their community. Seventeen years ago, Kelly Township's list of Community Development Objectives - as stated in its 1975 Comprehensive Plan - were as follows: 0 Preserve the rural character of the Township by limiting urbanization to those areas where the land is most compatible for these uses . and . Discourage non-farm development on lands best suited for agricultural uses - said agricultural lands being located in the central and western portions of the Township. Encourage the development of attractive, well-designed residential areas that can function as neighborhoods, while discouraging scattered ("spot") and "strip" residential developments. -2- E Limit industrial development to the eastern part of the Township where the 1 topography is suitable . and . adequate utilities and transportation facilities are available, or are economically feasible to provide. Concentrate commercial development near existing and future residential 8 areas which such commercial development is intended to serve . and . Discourage “strip” commercial development. I Develop year-round recreational facilities that are well located with relation to the population they serve . and . which are equipped to service all segments of the population. 1 Provide for adequate water and sewer facilities to serve the urbanized and developed areas of the Township. 1 Assure that all development is in harmony with the natural characteristics of the land . and . Cause development to be in harmony with the f environment. Provide a safe and efficient transportation system for the movement of people and goods within
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butler County Natural Heritage Inventory, 1991
    BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Lisa L. Smith, Natural Heritage Ecologist Charles W. Bier, Associate Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Paul G. Wiegman, Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Chris J. Boget, Data Manager Bernice K. Beck, Data Handler Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 316 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 July 1991 BUTLER COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 COUNTY OVERVIEW 9 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY 14 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS 15 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 133 LITERATURE CITED 134 APPENDICES I. Federal and State Endangered Species Categories, Global and State Element Ranks 135 II. County Significance Ranks 141 III. Potential Natural Heritage Inventory Form 142 IV. Recommended Natural Heritage Field Survey Form 143 V. Classification of Natural Communities in Pennsylvania (Draft) 144 LIST OF TABLES PAGE 1. Summary of sites in order of relative county significance 20 2. Important managed areas protecting biotic resources in Butler County 24 3. Butler County municipality summaries 27 Tables summarizing USGS quadrangles Baden 116 Barkeyville 37 Butler 103 Chicora 93 Curtisville 125 East Butler 90 Eau Claire 41 Emlenton 44 Evans City 108 Freeport 128 Grove City 34 Harlansburg 75 Hilliards 51 Mars 119 Mount Chestnut 86 Parker 48 Portersville 77 Prospect 81 Saxonburg 100 Slippery Rock 63 Valencia 122 West Sunbury 57 Worthington 97 Zelienople 113 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE 1. USGS quadrangle map index of Butler County 25 2. Municipalities of Butler County 26 3 INTRODUCTION Butler County possesses a wealth of natural resources including its flora, fauna, and natural habitats such as forests, wetlands, and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan 10-Year
    BUFFALO CREEK WATERSHED CONSERVATION PLAN 10-YEAR UPDATE September 2019 Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan 10- Year Update Armstrong, Butler, and Allegheny Counties, Pennsylvania Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania (ASWP) This project was funded in part by a grant from the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds. Prepared with support from GAI Consultants, Inc. Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan 10-Year Update | 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ASWP is grateful for the support it received while conducting the 10-year update to the Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan as well as during the development of the original plan. Thank you to the Buffalo Creek Watershed community members for providing input and support during the planning process. ASWP would like to recognize Dave Beale for his commitment to conservation in the watershed. We are deeply grateful for his support during this plan update and in awe of all that he has been able to accomplish for the watershed. ASWP would like to thank the following people for participating in stakeholder interviews: Dave Beale, Forester, Surveyor, and Armstrong Conservancy Charles Bier, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, Conservation Science Anthony Beers, PAFB Watershed Conservation Officer Mark Caruso, Freeport Middle School Anne Daymut, Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation Tye Desiderio, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Jeff Fliss, PA DEP Southwest Office Will Kmetz, Boy Scout Leader Virginia Lindsay, Landowner Ron Lybrook, PA DEP Northwest Office Bob
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Non-Point Engineering Assistance Program Annual Reporting Is Required on a Calendar Year Basis February 1
    Calendar Year 2013 Non-Point Engineering Assistance Program Annual reporting is required on a calendar year basis February 1. Please upload the completed report to the Accomplishments Report Attachments tab in eLINK for the 2013 Non-Point Engineering Assistance Program Grant . Please be sure to use the instructions and information categories provided at the red triangles above the corresponding column. TSA/JPO Number: 8 TSA/JPO Name North Central Minnesota SWCD JPB Prepared by: William Westerberg Date: 01/09/14 Telephone Number: 218-755-4341 E-mail Address: [email protected] Assistance Provided Technical Assistance Funding Source(s) Other Primary Site Construction Technical Type of Practice Assisted Practice Unit of Clean Water State other SWCD Project Identification Evaluation Design Assistance Assistance (From List Provided) Code Unit(s) Measure Federal Fund than CWF Local Landowner 1 Beltrami Agassiz 4(John Erickson) x Wetland 657 180 acres x 2 Beltrami Chadwick x Erosion Control 580 135 feet x x 3 Beltrami Chadwick x Erosion Control 378 1 each x x 4 Beltrami Beltrami County-Mississippi High Bank x Erosion Control 580 60 feet x 5 Beltrami Buzzle Township x Erosion Control 560 475 feet x 6 Beltrami Stelter LLC x x Wetland 657 235 acres x 7 Beltrami Heim x x Erosion Control 580 140 feet x x 8 Cass Humrickhouse x Erosion Control 580 50 feet x 9 Cass Shingabee Township Road x Erosion Control 587 1 each x 10 Clearwater Engebretson x Erosion Control 580 100 feet x 11 Clearwater Johnson x Erosion Control 350 35 acres x 12
    [Show full text]
  • MUD CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Columbia and Montour Counties
    MUD CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Columbia and Montour Counties Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection May 6, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TMDL SUMMARIES .................................................................................................................... 1 WATERSHED BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 2 Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 8 APPROACH TO TMDL DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 8 Pollutants & Sources ................................................................................................................. 8 TMDL Endpoints ...................................................................................................................... 9 Reference Watershed Approach ............................................................................................... 9 Selection of the Reference Watershed .................................................................................... 10 Watershed Assessment and Modeling .................................................................................... 13 TMDLS ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Background Pollutant Conditions ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Summary Fishing Summary
    2019PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws MENTORED YOUTH TROUT DAYS March 23 (regional) and April 6 (statewide) WHAT’S NEW FOR 2019 l Changes to Susquehanna and Juniata Bass Regulations–page 11 www.PaBestFishing.com l Addition and Removal to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 PFBC social media and mobile app: l Addition to Catch and Release Lakes Waters–page 15 www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia l Addition to Misc. Special Regulations–page 16 Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 30 AND April 13 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Go Fishin’ in Franklin County Chambersburg Trout Derby May 4-5, 2019 Area’s #1 Trout Derby ExploreFranklinCountyPA.com Facebook.com/FCVBen | Twitter.com/FCVB 866-646-8060 | 717-552-2977 2 www.fishandboat.com 2019 Pennsylvania Fishing Summary Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the PFBC LOCATIONS/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. FOR MORE INFORMATION: THANK YOU STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: for the purchase 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: Phone: (866) 262-8734 license! Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish & Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: EDUCATION COURSES Commonwealth’s aquatic resources, www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan Armstrong, Butler and Allegheny Counties, Pennsylvania September 2008
    Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan Armstrong, Butler and Allegheny Counties, Pennsylvania September 2008 THE PENNSYLVANIA RIVERS CONSERVATION PROGRAM BUFFALO CREEK WATERSHED CONSERVATION PLAN Armstrong, Butler, and Allegheny Counties, Pennsylvania AUDUBON SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA This project was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnerships Program, Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Prepared By: GAI Consultants, Inc. Pittsburgh Office 385 East Waterfront Drive Homestead, Pennsylvania 15120-5005 September 2008 Audubon Society of Western PA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania gratefully acknowledges the support from numerous people throughout the Buffalo Creek Watershed Conservation Plan process. Thank you to George Reese and the entire team at GAI Consultants, Inc. for the tremendous amount of work spent putting this plan together. Thank you to all of the community members, municipal leaders, and other stakeholders for their support, time and enthusiasm during the planning process. Terry Laux and Charles W. Bier are key stakeholders who assisted greatly in providing information, data, and advice throughout the preparation of this plan. Most of all, thank you to the dedicated members of the steering committee, who volunteered their time and energy toward this plan. Steering committee members, listed below, began meeting and discussing this plan in 2006. They continued to provide assistance, insight and direction during scheduled meetings, via email correspondence and during telephone conversations throughout the two-year planning process. For this, ASWP is truly appreciative. • David Beale, Armstrong Conservation District • Roger Claypoole, Creekside Mushrooms, LLC • Wes Cravener, Arrowhead Chapter Trout Unlimited • R.
    [Show full text]
  • 369 East Park Drive
    200 West Kensinger Drive, Suite 400 Cranberry Township, PA 16066 (724) 779-4777 [Phone] (724) 779-4711 [Fax] www.hrg-inc.com AUGUST 2017 NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM SMALL MS4s POLLUTANT REDUCTION PLAN EVANS CITY BOROUGH BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HRG Project No. 003217.0437 ©Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc., 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Public Participation ................................................................................................ 1 B. Map .................................................................................................................. 1 C. Pollutants of Concern .............................................................................................. 1 D. Determining Existing Loading for Pollutants of Concern ..................................................... 2 E. Select BMPs to Achieve the Minimum Required Reductions in Pollutant Loading ....................... 3 F. Identify Funding Mechanisms .................................................................................... 4 G. Identify Responsible Parties for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of BMPs ........................... 5 TABLES 1. Outfall Drainage Areas 2. State ROWs that Intersect MS4 Drainage Areas 3. Planning Area Summary 4. Existing Loading Rate 5. Street Sweeping 6. Vegetated Open Channels (C/D Soils) 7. Pollutant Loading Reduction Summary 8. Funding Oppurtunities 9. Operation and Maintenance of BMPs APPENDIX A. PRP for Public Review B. Public Notice for PRP Review C. Public Comments on PRP D. Map E. Outfall Drainage Areas
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 31, Issue 18 Virginia Register of Regulations May 4, 2015 1459 PUBLICATION SCHEDULE and DEADLINES
    VOL. 31 ISS. 18 PUBLISHED EVERY OTHER WEEK BY THE VIRGINIA CODE COMMISSION MAY 4, 2015 VOL TABLE OF CONTENTS Register Information Page ......................................................................................................................................... 1459 Publication Schedule and Deadlines ....................................................................................................................... 1460 Petitions for Rulemaking ............................................................................................................................................ 1461 Regulations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1462 8VAC40-130. Virginia Student Financial Assistance Program Regulations (Final) ............................................................. 1462 8VAC40-131. Virginia Student Financial Assistance Program Regulations (Final) ............................................................. 1462 9VAC25-115. General Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permit for Seafood Processing Facilities (Proposed)........................................................................................................................... 1468 9VAC25-720. Water Quality Management Planning Regulation (Final) .............................................................................. 1499 11VAC10-140. Flat Racing (Final) .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County, New York (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 5 ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Erie County Community Name Community Community Name Community Community Name Community Number Number Number Akron, Village of 361553 Depew, Village of 360236 Newstead, Town of 360251 Alden, Town of 360225 East Aurora, Town of 365335 North Collins, Town of 360252 Alden, Village of 360224 Eden, Town of 360238 North Collins, Village of 360252 Amherst, Town of 360226 Elma, Town of 360239 Orchard Park, Town of 360255 Angola, Village of 360982 Evans, Town of 360240 Orchard Park, Village of 360254 Aurora, Town of 360227 Farnham, Village of 361588 Sardinia, Town of 360256 Blasdell, Village of 361489 Gowanda, Village of 360075 Sloan, Village of 361589 Boston, Town of 360228 Grand Island, Town of 360242 Springville, Village of 360258 Brant, Town of 360229 Hamburg, Town of 360244 Tonawanda, City of 360259 Buffalo, City of 360230 Hamburg, Village of 360243 Tonawanda, Town of 360260 Cheektowaga, Town of 360231 Holland, Town of 360245 Wales, Town of 360261 Clarence, Town of 360232 Lackawanna, City of 360247 West Seneca, Town of 360262 Colden, Town of 360233 Lancaster, Town of 360249 Williamsville, Village of 360263 Collins, Town of 360234 Lancaster, Village of 360248 Concord, Town of 360235 Marilla, Town of 360250 PRELIMINARY: DECEMBER 31, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 36 029CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 Annual Report
    PIEDMONT SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT 2014-2015 Amelia, Nottoway and Prince Edward County Watersheds Rt. 360 Rt. 460 Rt. 460 Rt. 360 A watershed is all the land that water runs over on its way to a stream, pond, or other water body. In the map above, the Piedmont SWCD watersheds are numbered 1 thru 40. The numbers are listed below followed by the name of the stream that drains that watershed. Piedmont SWCD watersheds that empty into the Chesapeake Bay are in blue above. Those that empty into the Albemarle Sound (in North Carolina) are in purple above, and noted with an asterisk below. 1– Vaughans Creek 11– Sandy River 21– Bent Creek 31– Beaver Pond Creek 2– Spring Creek 12– Mountain Creek 22– Haw Branch 32– Sweathouse Creek 3– Dunker Creek 13– Evans Creek 23– Nibbs Creek 33– Cellar Creek 4—Lockett Creek 14– Dry Creek * 24– West Creek 34– Long Branch * 5– Little Buffalo Creek 15– Stock Creek 25– Little Creek 35- Red Oak Creek * 6– Bad Luck Branch 16– Sandy Creek 26– Whetstone Creek * 36– Nooning Crekk 7– Millers Creek 17– Beaver Creek 27– Cedar Creek * 37– Winticomack Creek 8– Briery Creek 18– Little Creek 28– Fishpond Creek 38– Namozine Creek 9– Angola Creek 19– Crystal Lake * 29– Skinquarter Creek 39- Butterwood Creek * 10– Saylers Creek 20– Falls Creek * 30– Smacks Creek 40– Beaver Pond Creek* We are ready to partner with you to improve the water in your watershed! N OTE FROM THE C HAIRMAN Do not try to sat- Just a few words to thank all who made it possible isfy your vanity by for the Piedmont Soil and Water Conservation District to teaching a great have another successful year.
    [Show full text]