Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth with Disabilities: a Meta-Synthesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth with Disabilities: a Meta-Synthesis Journal of LGBT Youth, 8:1–52, 2011 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1936-1653 print / 1936-1661 online DOI: 10.1080/19361653.2011.519181 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth with Disabilities: A Meta-Synthesis THOMAS SCOTT DUKE University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, Alaska, USA This meta-synthesis of empirical and nonempirical literature an- alyzed 24 journal articles and book chapters that addressed the intersection of disability, [homo]sexuality, and gender identity/ expression in P–12 schools, colleges and universities, supported living programs, and other educational and social contexts in Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The articles and chapters empha- sized the diversity of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth with disabilities—culturally, linguistically, sexually, and in terms of abilities, disabilities, and related service needs—while noting that all (or certainly most) lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgen- der youth with disabilities possess multiple stigmatized identities as sexual/gender minorities and young people with disabilities. KEYWORDS Disabilities, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, meta-analysis, youth Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people with disabilities come from diverse cultural and linguistic communities, have a wide range of abil- ities and disabilities, and represent multiple sexual orientations and gender identities/expressions. Harley, Nowak, Gassaway, and Savage (2002) de- scribed LGBT individuals with disabilities as “members of multiple cultural minority groups” who experience multiple forms of oppression and have “multiple service needs involving disabilities ... [and] identities” (p. 525); Bennett and Coyle (2007) referred to lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with disabilities as a “minority within a minority” who simultaneously “occupy [multiple] ...socially devalued position[s]” (p. 125); and Vernon (1999) noted Received 8 March 2010; revised 14 April 2010; accepted 3 May 2010. Address correspondence to Dr. Thomas Scott Duke, University of Alaska Southeast, 11120 Glacier Hwy, Juneau, AK 99801-8671. E-mail: [email protected] 1 2 T. S. Duke “disabled ... gay men and lesbians” are “people with multiple stigmatized identities” who “experience oppression singularly, multiply and simultane- ously depending on the context” (p. 395). LGBT individuals with disabilities are routinely subjected to homophobia, heterosexism, and ableism. Many also experience racism, sexism, classism, ageism, and other forms of social oppression. Vernon explains: “Impairment, which is a precondition of dis- ability, settles upon anyone, but the effect on any individual is very largely modified, minimized, or exacerbated by who that person is in terms of their ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, age and class” (1999, p. 395). Homophobia, heterosexism, and ableism within the health and social services sectors, homophobia and heterosexism within the special education and disability services establishments and disability rights movement, and ableism among members of the LGBT community have marginalized LGBT people with disabilities, and—until fairly recently—rendered them all but in- visible in the health and social sciences, special education, disability studies, and sexuality studies literature (Duke, 2010; McRuer, 2006a; Morris, 1991; Shakespeare, Gillespie-Sells, & Daives, 1997). Fraley, Mona, and Theodore (2007) found that LGBT individuals with disabilities “represent a popula- tion that has received little attention in the areas of social policy, sexuality studies, and psychological research and practice” (p. 27); Morrow (2003) ob- served LGBT people with disabilities “continue to be underrepresented and marginalized in an already sparse [counseling psychology] literature base” (p. 70); Cheng (2009) acknowledged that social science “research on the intersection of disability, gender, and sexuality is limited” (p. 112); O’Toole and Brown (2002) discovered “no systematic research on the mental health needs of lesbians with disabilities exists” (p. 35); and Abbott and Burns (2007) noted “the voices of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with intellec- tual disabilities have rarely been heard in [special education and disability services] policy and research” (p. 27). In recent years, however, a still nascent but rapidly evolving, increasingly sophisticated, and steadily growing body of empirical and theoretical literature has explored the intersection of dis- ability, sexuality, and gender identity/expression in the lives of LGBT adults (Abbott & Howarth, 2005, 2007; Hunt, Matthews, Milsom, & Lammel, 2006; LeBlanc & Tully, 2001; McRuer, 2006b; McRuer & Wilkerson, 2003; O’Toole, 2000; O’Toole & D’aust, 2000; Parkes & Wilson, 2009; Thompson, 2002; Thompson, Bryson, & De Castell, 2001). Unfortunately, much less is known about the lives and experiences of LGBT youth with disabilities. PROBLEM STATEMENT While the school experiences of (non-disabled) LGBT youth have been under-documented (Kosciw, 2004), the P–12 experiences of LGBT youth with disabilities have been virtually ignored (Duke, 2010). At present, only a Disabilities: A Meta-Synthesis 3 handful of studies explore the intersection of disability, [homo]sexuality, and gender identity/expression in P–12 settings (Blanchett, 2002; Blyth & Car- son, 2007; Carson, 2002; Corker, 2001; DuBeau, 1997). In recent years, how- ever, educators, researchers, and practitioners—representing a wide range of disciplinary perspectives, including special education, disability studies, school psychology, counseling psychology, clinical psychology, pediatric medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical neuroscience, gender/ sexuality studies, health education, cultural studies, social work, and school administration—have produced empirical works that document the lived experiences of LGBT youth in nonschool settings (e.g., supported living programs for adolescents and young adults) and nonempirical works that address the intersection of disability, [homo]sexuality, and gender iden- tity/expression in P–12 schools, colleges and universities, supported living programs, and other educational and social contexts in Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This study seeks to document the recent emergence of an international and multidisciplinary body of literature on LGBT youth with disabilities by gath- ering together, analyzing, and synthesizing these disparate empirical and nonempirical, international, and multidisciplinary sources. RESEARCH DESIGN In her paper, “Meta-Synthesis”, Bair (1999) detailed a qualitative research process that can be used to combine the results from multiple research studies or from a large body of research. She referred to this process as meta-synthesis. Bair explained the process of meta-synthesis—which she described as a distinct methodology—by comparing it with meta-analysis and meta-ethnography, two additional methodologies that are commonly used to review large bodies of research and systematically synthesize the findings. Bair noted: Whereas meta-analysis is a quantitative methodology applied to quan- titative research studies, and meta-ethnography is a qualitative method- ology used with qualitative research studies, meta-synthesis is a qual- itative methodology that uses both qualitative and quantitative studies as sources of data. Like meta-ethnography, it is an integrative approach in the phenomenological, or interpretive, paradigm of naturalistic in- quiry. It is concerned with understanding and describing key points and themes contained within a research literature on a given topic. However, it differs from meta-ethnography, in that it synthesizes studies from both quantitative and qualitative research. As such, it fills a void in research methodology. (p. 4) 4 T. S. Duke This study might best be described as a meta-synthesis of the empirical and nonempirical international literature on LGBT youth with disabilities be- cause the author systematically collected qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research studies, as well as nonempirical literature (e.g., theoretical works, descriptive works, guides), and then used a modified version of the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method—a highly reductive method of data analysis frequently used by researchers working within the phenomenological tradi- tion of qualitative inquiry—to synthesize the content of these various sources of data (Duke, 2007; Duke & McCarthy, 2009; Duke & Ward, 2009). METHODS Selection Criteria The 24 journal articles and book chapters included in this meta-synthesis met the following selection criteria: 1. The articles and chapters explored the intersection of disability, sexuality, and gender identity/expression in the lives of LGBT youth. 2. The articles and chapters addressed one or more of the disabilities rec- ognized by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004. Publications that described factors that place LGBT youth at risk for negative social, emotional, and/or physical outcomes (e.g., substance abuse, family problems, homelessness, school failure, mental health problems, suicide, HIV infection), but did not explicitly address specific disabilities recognized by IDEA were excluded from this meta- synthesis, as were publications that described mental health or community services consumed by LGBT youth without identifying specific diagnoses that meet IDEA eligibility
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Diversity and Inclusion: Understanding and Addressing Ableism, Heterosexism, and Transmisia in the Legal Profession: Comm
    American Journal of Law & Medicine, 47 (2021): 76-87 © 2021 The Author(s) DOI: 10.1017/amj.2021.3 Beyond Diversity and Inclusion: Understanding and Addressing Ableism, Heterosexism, and Transmisia in the Legal Profession: Comment on Blanck, Hyseni, and Altunkol Wise’s National Study of the Legal Profession Shain A. M. Neumeier† and Lydia X. Z. Brown†† I. INTRODUCTION Far too many—if not most—of us in the legal profession who belong to both the disability and LGBTQþ communities have known informally, through our own experi- ences and those of others like us, that workplace bias and discrimination on the basis of disability, sexuality, and gender identity is still widespread. The new study by Blanck et al. on diversity and inclusion in the U.S. legal profession provides empirical proof of this phenomenon, which might otherwise be dismissed as being based on anecdotal evidence.1 Its findings lend credibility to our position that the legal profession must make systemic changes to address workplace ableism, heterosexism, and transmisia.2 They also suggest †Committee for Public Counsel Services, Mental Health Litigation Division. (The contents of this article are published in the author’s personal capacity.) ††Georgetown University, Disability Studies Program, [email protected]. With thanks to Sara M. Acevedo Espinal, Jennifer Scuro, and Jess L. Cowing for support. 1Peter Blanck, Fitore Hyseni & Fatma Artunkol Wise, Diversity and Inclusion in the American Legal Profession: Discrimination and Bias Reported by Lawyers with Disabilities and Lawyers Who Identify as LGBTQþ,47Am. J.L. & Med. 9, 9 (2021) [hereinafter Blanck, et al., Discrimination and Bias].
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the Living Conditions of People with Disabilities in Ukraine Under the Conditions of the Covid-19 Pandemic (On
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 41 Issue 4 Ukrainian Protestants Article 12 5-2021 Monitoring of the Living Conditions of People with Disabilities in Ukraine under the Conditions of the Covid-19 Pandemic (On the Example of Evangelical Christian Baptists) Olga Polumysna V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Polumysna, Olga (2021) "Monitoring of the Living Conditions of People with Disabilities in Ukraine under the Conditions of the Covid-19 Pandemic (On the Example of Evangelical Christian Baptists)," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 41 : Iss. 4 , Article 12. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol41/iss4/12 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONITORING OF THE LIVING CONDITIONS OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN UKRAINE UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (on the example of Evangelical Christian Baptists) By Olga Polumysna Olga Polumysna is a doctoral student at the Institute of Journalism of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, a Candidate of Philological Sciences, and an Associate Professor of the Department of Journalism at the V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Research interests: mass media, people with disabilities, religion. E-mail: [email protected] Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-0588.
    [Show full text]
  • Being an Ally for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and T Ransgender People
    Being an Ally for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People 1919 University Avenue West, Suite 400, St. Paul, MN 55104 Tel. 651-645-2948 or 888-NAMIHELPS www.namihelps.org Here are some guidelines for people wanting to be allies for LGBT people around them. In today’s world, LGBT issues are being discussed more than ever before…in the media, in community programs, in schools, churches, offices, in the streets, and in people’s homes. These discussions are often emotionally charged as this can be a threatening topic for many people, and clear information is often difficult to find. Being an ally is important, but it is challenging as well as exciting. This list is not exhaustive, but provides some starting points. Add your own ideas and suggestions! Don’t assume heterosexuality. We tend to assume that everyone we meet is heterosexual even though we know this is not true. Often people hide that they are LGBT until they know it is safe to “come out” in a given situation. Use neutral language when first working with students/clients/customers until you know for certain what the person prefers (for example, the gender of their significant other). Educate yourself about lesbian, gay, bi, and transgender issues. There are many resources, reading lists, and organizations available for information. Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Explore ways to creatively integrate LGBT issues in your work. Doing so can be a valuable process for everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Integrating LGBT people and issues instead of separating them out as a “special topic” is an important strategy for conveying and creating respect and acceptance.
    [Show full text]
  • A/69/261 General Assembly
    United Nations A/69/261 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 August 2014 Original: English Sixty-ninth session Item 69 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Elimination of all forms of religious intolerance Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, submitted in accordance with General Assembly resolution 68/170. * A/69/150. 14-58756 (E) 250814 *1458756* A/69/261 Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief Summary In the present report, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, provides an overview of his mandate activities since the submission of the previous report to the General Assembly (A/68/290), including his reports to the Human Rights Council and on country visits, as well as communications and highlights of presentations and consultations. The Special Rapporteur then focuses on means to eliminate religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace, a theme which he thinks warrants more systematic attention. The sources of religious intolerance and discrimination in the workplace can be manifold and include prejudices existing among employers, employees or customers, restrictive interpretations of corporate identity or a general fear of religious diversity. After clarifying that the human right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief also relates to manifestations of religious diversity in the workplace, the Special Rapporteur particularly deals with measures of “reasonable accommodation” that may be needed to overcome discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Sheet – Universal Design, Inclusion and Inclusive Health What
    New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Disability Services Inclusive Healthy Communities Grant Program Resource Sheet – Universal Design, Inclusion and Inclusive Health What is Universal Design? According to the Centre for Excellence in Universal Design, universal design (sometimes also called inclusive design or barrier-free design) is the design and structure of an environment so that it can be understood, accessed, and used to the greatest extent possible by all people regardless of their age or ability. That means planning around peoples’ diverse needs and abilities (like kids, parents, seniors, people with injuries or illnesses, and people with disabilities) to create environments that actually meet those needs and abilities. In short, universal design is simple, useful, and accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities. Rather than everyone getting, “the same,” universal design incorporates the needs of diverse users. A familiar example of universal design is the curb cut, which provides wheelchair users, people with strollers, and workers using hand trucks better access to streets and curbs at differing levels. In order to facilitate people with differing abilities, of differing ages and sizes within society, systems must be designed with the user at the center of the design process. A universally designed environment makes life easier, safer, and more inclusive for everyone. For more information on Universal Design, see: http://universaldesign.ie/What-is-Universal-Design/ https://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/accessibility-ud-slides.pdf https://www.rickhansen.com/news-stories/blog/universal-design-101 Inclusion "Nothing About Us Without Us!" (Latin: "Nihil de nobis, sine nobis") is a slogan used to communicate the idea that no policy should be decided by any representative without the full and direct participation of members of the group(s) affected by that policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Catholicism V. Al Smith: an Analysis of Anti-Catholicism in the 1928 Presidential Election
    Verbum Volume 9 Issue 1 Article 2 December 2011 Anti-Catholicism v. Al Smith: An Analysis of Anti-Catholicism in the 1928 Presidential Election Michael Rooney St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Rooney, Michael (2011) "Anti-Catholicism v. Al Smith: An Analysis of Anti-Catholicism in the 1928 Presidential Election," Verbum: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol9/iss1/2 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol9/iss1/2 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anti-Catholicism v. Al Smith: An Analysis of Anti-Catholicism in the 1928 Presidential Election Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "With few exceptions, the details of past presidential elections are largely forgotten over the course of history. As specific campaigns and elections become more distant from contemporary society, people tend to focus on the larger picture of what that election produced, mainly, who actually became the president. And for the majority of the American public, the presidential election of 1928 is no exception to this. But as Allan Lichtman suggests in his book Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928, ―Presidential elections are central events of American politics, often bearing the detailed imprint of the society in which they occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Diversity and Reasonable Accommodation in the Workplace In
    Article International Journal of Discrimination and the Law Religious diversity 1–29 ª The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permission: and reasonable sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1358229113493691 accommodation in jdi.sagepub.com the workplace in six European countries: An introduction Veit Bader1, Katayoun Alidadi2 and Floris Vermeulen1 Abstract After a period during which many in the West, especially Europe, expected religion to progressively fade away from public life, for various reasons religion has, over the last two decades, re-established itself as a phenomenon to be reckoned with in the globa- lized West. It has also become a favoured research topic for, amongst others, social scientists and legal scholars. While the European Union (EU) has a limited competency when it comes to matters of religion, in 2000 an important Directive was adopted, pro- hibiting discrimination on the basis of religion or belief in the area of employment. The EU’s interest, however, extends beyond the anti-discrimination framework, explaining why in 2010 it funded a three-year multidisciplinary project on religious diversity and secularism in Europe (RELIGARE). One of the areas of investigation, illustrating the various tensions that arise when religious claims are formulated in 21st-century Europe, concerned the area of employment and labour relations. This article provides an intro- duction – philosophical, legal and sociological – to a special issue with six contributions drawing from sociological data collected within the RELIGARE project. From a socio- logical perspective, these contributions illustrate the challenges and tensions raised by religion and belief both in secular workplaces (the individual religious freedom cluster)and 1University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium Corresponding author: Katayoun Alidadi, Institute for Human Rights and Critical Studies, Law Faculty, Catholic University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 41, Box 3416, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN the DOOR of CHRISTIAN EDUCATION to ALL STUDENTS: a CALL for CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REFORM by TAMMY BACHRACH Abstract Does Bibli
    15 OPEN THE DOOR OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION TO ALL STUDENTS: A CALL FOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL REFORM BY TAMMY BACHRACH Abstract Does biblical justice include people with disabilities? Like the orphan and widow of Christ’s day, people with disability have historically been marginalized, frequently experiencing poverty and isolation. A biblical worldview of disability and a Christian community, which seeks to have the mind of Christ, ought to challenge the exclusion and injustices people with disability experience in our communities. This article will interweave the author’s personal experience as a Christian member of the disability community, disability studies scholarship, and a biblical worldview of disability to examine the current practice of excluding people with disabilities from Christian school education. The goal is to examine our societal biases and practices and respond to people with disabilities in a manner that is pleasing to Christ Jesus and to work toward reform within Christian schools in order to actively include people with disabilities. Keywords: biblical justice, children with disabilities, Christian schools, medical model, social model, inclusion BACHRACH: Open the Door of Christian Education to All Students: A Call for Christian School Reform Justice, Spirituality & Education Journal; Spring 2015; Vol. 3, No. 1; ISSN 2379-3538 16 “Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals” (Martin Luther King, Jr.). Defining Biblical
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Christian Privilege in the College Experiences of Jewish and Muslim Undergraduates
    IT’S A CHRISTIAN WORLD: THE ROLE OF CHRISTIAN PRIVILEGE IN THE COLLEGE EXPERIENCES OF JEWISH AND MUSLIM UNDERGRADUATES By Brianna K. Becker A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education – Doctor of Philosophy 2016 ABSTRACT IT’S A CHRISTIAN WORLD: THE ROLE OF CHRISTIAN PRIVILEGE IN THE COLLEGE EXPERIENCES OF JEWISH AND MUSLIM UNDERGRADUATES By Brianna K. Becker This qualitative study explored the role of Christian privilege in the college experiences of Jewish and Muslim undergraduates at one large public, land grant, research intensive university, a predominantly white institution (PWI) in the Midwest. I interviewed 13 participants, seven Muslims (four women, three men) and six Jews (three women, three men), about their experiences in college, how Christian privilege appeared (or did not) in those experiences, and how and if they defined Christian privilege for themselves. Through narrative inquiry, in single session, semi-structured interviews, I gathered the stories of these 13 participants and the role of Christian privilege in their college experiences at Midwest University (MU). This study provides an in depth exploration of what was in the current news when this study was conducted and written up regarding Jews and Muslims in the United States and particularly in higher education. A full chapter is dedicated to a history of religion, particularly Christianity and especially Protestantism, in the United States (and colonial America) and its higher education using Roger Geiger’s (2005) “The Ten Generations of American Higher Education” and Douglas Jacobsen and Rhonda Hustedt Jacobsen’s (2012) No Longer Invisible: Religion in University Education as guideposts for understanding that history.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability, Oppression and Empowerment
    The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 26 Issue 1 March - Special Issue on Population Article 14 Aging: Social Problems and Solutions March 1999 Review of Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability, Oppression and Empowerment. James I. Charlton. Reviewed by Stephanie Brzuzy, Arizona State University. Stephanie Brzuzy Arizona State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Brzuzy, Stephanie (1999) "Review of Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability, Oppression and Empowerment. James I. Charlton. Reviewed by Stephanie Brzuzy, Arizona State University.," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 26 : Iss. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol26/iss1/14 This Book Review is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact wmu- [email protected]. Book Reviews 191 The discussion on the social response to single African Amer- ican women who succeed in the workplace is worthy of note. Experiences of the women in the study are reminiscent of the right wing double message to women. That is, welfare mothers are viewed negatively for staying home with their children and not working while simultaneously, middle-class white women are made to feel guilty for going to work and not staying home with their children. Similarly, African American women who are single and successful are treated punitively for not being married rather than being respected and rewarded for not being on the welfare dole. Additionally, the successful black woman may be seen as symbolic of the failure of black men (and others) and this can spill over negatively into family and community life.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – Glossary of Terms Ableism
    Diversity, Equity and Inclusion – Glossary of Terms Ableism- discrimination against persons with mental and/or physical disabilities; social structures that favor able-bodied individuals. (The National Multicultural Institute) Acculturation- the process of learning and incorporating the language, values, beliefs, and behaviors that makes up a distinct culture. This concept is not to be confused with assimilation, where an individual or group may give up certain aspects of its culture in order to adapt to that of the prevailing culture. (The National Multicultural Institute) Affirmative Action- proactive policies and procedures for remedying the effect of past discrimination and ensuring the implementation of equal employment and educational opportunities, for recruiting, hiring, training and promoting women, minorities, people with disabilities and veterans in compliance with the federal requirements enforced by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). (Society for Human Resources Management) Ageism- discrimination against individuals because of their age, often based on stereotypes. (The National Multicultural Institute) Ally- a person who takes action against oppression out of a belief that eliminating oppression will benefit members of targeted groups and advantage groups. Allies acknowledge disadvantage and oppression of other groups than their own, take supportive action on their behalf, commit to reducing their own complicity or collusion in oppression of these groups, and invest in strengthening their own knowledge and awareness of oppression. (Center for Assessment and Policy Development) Anti-Oppression - Recognizing and deconstructing the systemic, institutional and personal forms of disempowerment used by certain groups over others; actively challenging the different forms of oppression. (Center for Anti-Oppressive Education) Bias - a positive or negative inclination towards a person, group, or community; can lead to stereotyping.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blaine Amendments & Anti-Catholicism
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS School Choice The Blaine Amendments & Anti-Catholicism U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov On June 1, 2007, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (the “Commission”) conducted a briefing in Washington, D.C. on the status and effect of Blaine Amendments, which are provisions in state constitutions that restrict the use of public funds to support private religious schools. The Commission heard testimony from Anthony R. Picarello, Jr., Vice President and General Counsel of the Becket Fund; K. Hollyn Hollman, General Counsel of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty; Ellen Johnson, President of American Atheists; and Richard D. Komer, Senior Litigation Attorney at the Institute for Justice. Following are biographies of the four panelists, prepared statements by the four panelists, a written statement submitted by the Anti-Defamation League, and the transcript of the proceeding. Table of Contents Panelists’ Biographies ......................................................................................................... 2 Panelists’ Statements .......................................................................................................... 5 Anthony R. Picarello, Jr. ................................................................................................. 5 K. Hollyn Hollman ........................................................................................................ 13 Ellen Johnson ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]