Nigeria Benin Togo Burkina Faso Niger Ghana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nigeria Benin Togo Burkina Faso Niger Ghana ! 1°E 2°E 3°E 4°E 5°E 6°E! ! ! ! MA-024 !Boulgou !Kantchari Gwadu Birnin-Kebbi ! Tambawel Matiacoali ! ! Pekinga Aliero ! ! ! A f r i c a Jega Niger ! Gunmi ! Anka Diapaga Koulou Birnin Tudu B! enin ! Karimam!a Bunza ! ! ! N N ° ° 2 Zugu 2 1 ! 1 Gaya Kamba ! Karimama Malanville ! ! Atlantic Burkina Faso Guéné ! Ocean Kombongou ! Dakingari Fokku ! Malanville ! ! Aljenaari ! Arli Mahuta ! ! Founougo ! Zuru Angaradébou ! ! Wasagu Kérémou Koko ! ! Banikoara ! Bagudo Banikoara ! ! ! Kaoje ! Duku Kandi ! Kandi ! Batia Rijau ! ! Porga N ! N ° Tanguieta ° 1 1 1 Ségbana 1 Kerou ! Yelwa Mandouri Segbana ! ! Konkwesso Ukata ! ! Kérou Gogounou Gouandé ! ! Bin-Yauri ! Materi ! ! Agwarra Materi Gogounou ! Kouté Tanguieta ! ! Anaba Gbéroubouè ! ! Ibeto Udara Toukountouna ! ! Cobly !Toukountouna Babana Kouande ! Kontagora Sinendé Kainji Reservoir ! ! Dounkassa Natitingou Kouandé ! Kalale ! ! Kalalé ! ! Bouka Bembereke ! Boukoumbe Natitingou Pehunko Sinende ! Kagara Bembèrèkè Auna ! ! Boukoumbé ! Tegina ! N N ° ° 0 Kandé 0 ! Birni ! 1 ! 1 ! Wawa Ndali Nikki ! ! New Bussa ! Kopargo Zungeru !Kopargo ! Kizhi Niamtougou Ndali ! Pizhi ! Djougou Yashikera ! ! Ouaké ! ! Pagoud!a Pya ! Eban ! Djougou Kaiama ! Guinagourou Kosubosu ! Kara ! ! ! Ouake Benin Perere Kutiwengi ! Kabou ! Bafilo Alédjo Parakou ! ! ! Okuta Parakou ! Mokwa Bassar ! Kudu ! ! Pénessoulou Jebba Reservoir ! Bétérou Kutigi ! ! ! Tchaourou Bida Kishi ! ! ! Tchamba ! Dassa ! Bassila Sinou 2°E ! ! Nigeria ! N N Sokodé ° ° ! Save 9 9 Bassila Savalou Bode-Sadu !Paouignan Tchaourou Ilesha Ibariba ! ! ! Lafiagi Koussountou ! Muregi ! Igboho ! ! Dassa Ndeji Fazao Igbetti ! Pategi ! ! ! Agouna Shaki ! ! Sotouboua ! ! Erufu Kilibo ! Pira ! Retenue de Nangbéto ! Ago-Are Ilorin Ouesse ! ! Bantè ! Ouèssè Ountivou Meko ! ! Djidja Ketou ! Blitta Kokoro ! Otola Aklampa ! ! ! Afon Bante ! Kétou ! Isanlu Ajasse ! C! ove Okaka Egbe ! ! Offa Omu-Aran ! Ogbomosho ! ! Kamina Glazoue ! ! Zangnanado Togo! Doumè Savè Kpèssi ! ! Wasinmi Oke-Iho Covè ! Ila! Orangun N ! Zakpota N ! ° Glazoué Igandan Iseyin ° 8 ! ! ! Bohicon 8 Savalou ! ! ! ! Save Abomey Aplahoue BIlobouhicon ! Kabba Tchetti Savalou ! ! Oyo Dassa ! ! Oshogbo Omuo Ede ! Anié Agbangnizou! ! Pobe ! Effon-Alaiye Kougnohou ! Ouinhi ! D!assa Ilesha Igangan Tohoun Iwo ! Paouignan ! ! ! Ado-Ekiti Okene N Zogbodome ! !N ! Agouna ° Klouekanme Ilawe-Ekiti Pobè ° ! 7 Eruwa Moniya ! ! 7 Re!tenue de Nangbéto ! ! Ikare Aplahoué Ife Ikere ! Ountivou Meko ! ! ! Oka Igbo-Ora ! ! Djidja Ketou ! ! Ibadan Adja-ouere Amlamé ! ! Kétou Toviklin Ikire Cove ! ! Lalo Bonou ! Sodo Djakotome Toffo Akure ! Zangnanado ! Abomey Zakpota !Covè Aiyetoro Owo Wahala ! ! ! Dogbo-tota ! ! Abomey Shasha Aplahoue Bohicon Abeokuta ! Ondo Sakete ! ! Ze Agbangnizou Pobe ! Sakété Tohoun Ouinhi ! ! N Klouekanme N ° Zogbodome ! Adjohoun ° 7 7 Notsé Aplahoué Adja-ouere Iperu Allad!a ! ! !Lokossa Ifon Bopa Allada ! ! Toviklin ! Lokossa Ifangni Ilaro Shagamu Djakotome Lalo Toffo Bonou ! ! Ijebu-Ode ! Akpro-misserete Owena Dogbo-tota Tabligbo Athieme Ore ! Irrua Ze Sakete ! Kajola ! Dangbo Avrankou Ekpoma ! !Sakété Ota ! ! Adjohoun ! Houeyogbe Tori-bossito ! Bopa Alla!da Lok! ossa Ikeja Ikorodu Avrankou Ifangni ! ! Epe Lokossa ! Abomey-calavi Porto-Novo Tabligbo Mushin Siluko ! Adjarra ! Dangbo ! So-ava " Athieme Tori-bossito Okitipupa ! Assahoun Houeyogbe Kpomasse ! Porto-novo Badagry ! Tsévié Adjarra Aguegues ! ! Kpomasse Abomey-calavi " Lekki Lagoon Iguobazuwa Kévé Aguegues Badagry ! Vogan ComeLac Ahémè ! ! Vogan ! L!agos Lac Nokoué ! Come So-ava Seme-kpodji Ouidah ! O! uidah ! Seme-kpodji ! Ouidah Igbokoda Cotonou Cotonou ! Benin City Dzodze Grand-popo ! Agbor Bojiboji ! !Grand-Popo Grand-popo ! Aného ! Grand-Popo ! Lomé ! !Denu Aného Mahin ! ! ! ! Aflao 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 Ghana km N Koko N ° ! ° 6 ´ 6 Keta ! 2°E 1°E 2°E 3°E 4°E 5°E ! 6°E 0 20 40 60 80 Legend km Scale 1:2 250 000 at A3 size Affected Communes Unusually High Flooding - Assistance Required (Govt / IFRC assessed) Created 20 July 2009 / 12:00 Early Flooding - No Assistance Required (Govt / UNDAC / InterAgency assessed) Map document MA024-Benin-AffCom_20th-A3P-v1 Early Flooding - No Assistance required (not assessed) Projection / datum UTM Zone 31N / WGS84 Wind damage - No Assistance Required (not assessed) GLIDE Number FL-2009-000127-BEN No Reported Damage Benin: Flooding - International Boundaries The depiction and use of boundaries, names and Departement Boundaries associated data shown here do not imply Affected endorsement or acceptance by MapAction. SUMMARY: Map shows the affected Data sources: www.mapaction.org Communes communes categorised by type of Affected Communes: Government of Benin, UNDAC, IFRC, [email protected] damage and assessment. Inter Agency MapAction is grateful (as at 20 July 2009) Topographical data - Collins-Bartholomew for the support of DFID Administrative Boundaries - GAUL.
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Projdoc.Pdf
    Tanguieta Toucountouna Benin Natitingou Perma Intervention areas: child protection, hunger and health Abomey Condji - Lokossa Cotonou Project “Nurse Me” This project stems from the need to support the children hosted in three of our accommodation centres in Benin, through the supply of powder milk. ‘Nurse me’ involves undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, and who for these reasons can’t be breastfed during the first months of their lives. The project develops in the regions of Zou and Atacora, two areas in which inhabitants live mainly in rural villages. The health situation in these regions is alarming: childbirth mortality rate is extremely high and newborns are often underweight. Moreover, breastfeeding without blood ties is not contemplated in Benin’s culture. This factor, together with malnutrition, lack of hygiene, and the rampant plague of AIDS, causes several deceases. In addition to this, international aid has decreased, because of two issues: 1) the global economic crisis has led governments to reduce the aid to the countries of the South; 2) the World Food Programme has diminished the food aid in favour of Benin, in order to allocate more in support of countries at war. Insieme ai bambini del mondo Project objectives - Promote the right to life and health; - Prevent babies’ premature death caused by the impossibility of breastfeeding. Project beneficiaries - Undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, who are hosted in our accommodation centres or monitored by the nutritional centre; - Families living in rural areas around our accommodation centres, which can benefit from a free health and nutritional service for their children.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Étrangère Dans L'alibori Synthèse Des Principaux Résult
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN ------------------- MINISTERE DU PLAN ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT ------------------- Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique Synthèse des principaux résultats du RGPH-4 de l’ALIBORI 1- Etat et structure de la population de l’Alibori Evolution de la population de l’Alibori de 2002 à 2013 Taux d'accroissement Poids DIVISIONS RGPH4-2013 RGPH3-2002 intercensitaire démographique ADMINISTRATIVES en % (2002- en % en 2013 Total Masculin Féminin Total Masculin Féminin 2013) BENIN 10 008 749 4 887 820 5 120 929 6 769 914 3 284 119 3 485 795 3,52 ALIBORI 867 463 431 357 436 106 521 093 259 588 261 505 4,61 8,7 Banikoara 246 575 122 445 124 130 152 028 75 829 76 199 4,37 28,4 Gogounou 117 523 58 018 59 505 80 013 39 759 40 254 3,46 13,5 Kandi 179 290 88 998 90 292 95 206 47 600 47 606 5,76 20,7 Karimama 66 353 33 149 33 204 39 579 19 792 19 787 4,68 7,6 Malanville 168 641 83 681 84 960 101 628 50 263 51 365 4,58 19,4 Ségbana 89 081 45 066 44 015 52 639 26 345 26 294 4,77 10,3 En 2013, le département de l’Alibori compte 867 463 habitants soit 8,7% Evolution (en %) de la structure par âge de la population de l'Alibori au RGPH-1992, RGPH-2002 25,0 de la population béninoise. Le taux et RGPH-2013 1992 2002 2013 d’accroissement intercensitaire de 20,0 On constate depuis 1992 une 4,61% est supérieur à la moyenne augmentation de la proportion de la nationale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation
    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Lead Authors:∗ Tamara Gurevich and Peter Herman Contributing Authors: Nabil Abbyad, Meryem Demirkaya, Austin Drenski, Jeffrey Horowitz, and Grace Kenneally Version 1.00 Abstract This document provides technical documentation for the Dynamic Gravity dataset. The Dynamic Gravity dataset provides extensive country and country pair information for a total of 285 countries and territories, annually, between the years 1948 to 2016. This documentation extensively describes the methodology used for the creation of each variable and the information sources they are based on. Additionally, it provides a large collection of summary statistics to aid in the understanding of the resulting Dynamic Gravity dataset. This documentation is the result of ongoing professional research of USITC Staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. It is circulated to promote the active exchange of ideas between USITC Staff and recognized experts outside the USITC, professional devel- opment of Office Staff and increase data transparency by encouraging outside professional critique of staff research. Please address all correspondence to [email protected] or [email protected]. ∗We thank Renato Barreda, Fernando Gracia, Nuhami Mandefro, and Richard Nugent for research assistance in completion of this project. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Nomenclature . .3 1.2 Variables Included in the Dataset . .3 1.3 Contents of the Documentation . .6 2 Country or Territory and Year Identifiers 6 2.1 Record Identifiers .
    [Show full text]
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Projet De Vulgarisation De L'aquaculture Continentale En République Du Bénin Quatrième Session Ordinaire Du Comité De Suiv
    Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aquaculture Continentale en République du Bénin Bureau du Projet / Direction des Pêches Tel: 21 37 73 47 No 004 Le 22 Juillet 2011 Email: [email protected] Un an après son démarrage en juin 2011, le Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aquaculture Continentale en République du Bénin (PROVAC), a connu un bilan positif meublé d’activités diverses mais essentiellement axées sur les formations de pisciculteurs ordinaires par l’approche « fermier à fermier »démarré au début du mois de juin 2010, poursuit ses activités et vient d’amor‐ cer le neuvième mois de sa mise en œuvre. Quatrième session ordinaire du Comité de Suivi Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2011 s’est tenue, dans la salle de formation de la Direction des Pêches à Cotonou, la quatrième session ordinaire du Comité de Suivi du Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aqua‐ culture Continentale en République du Bénin (PROVAC). Cette rencontre a connu la participation des membres du Comité de Suivi désignés par les quatre Centres Régionaux pour la Promotion Agricole (CeRPA) impliqués dans le Projet sur le terrain et a été rehaussée par la présence de la Représentante Résidente de la JICA au Bénin. A cette session, les CeRPA Ouémé/Plateau, Atlantique/Littoral, Zou/Collines et Mono/Couffo ont fait le point des activités du Projet sur le terrain, d’une part, et le Plan de Travail Annuel (PTA) 4e session ordinaire approuvé à Tokyo par la JICA au titre de l’année japonaise 2011 a été exposé, d’autre part, par le du Comité du Suivi Chef d’équipe des experts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cage Project Final Evaluation 2001-2005
    COMMUNITY ACTION FOR GIRLS EDUCATION WORLD LEARNING / USAID CAGE PROJECT FINAL EVALUATION 2001-2005 June 2005 Justin DONGBEHOUNDE François GAUTHO Consultants CONTENTS Pages 0- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I- BACKGROUND 5 II- OBJECTIVES AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES 5 III- EVALUATION PROBLEMS 7 IV- EVALUATION RESULTATS 7 1. Level of results achievement and objectives 7 2. Analysis of the approach, strategies and stakeholders 17 3. Management and coordination of the project 19 4. Sustainability durability and replication of the experience 20 5. Strengths and weaknesses of the project 21 V- CONCLUSIONS 22 VI- RECOMMENDATIONS 23 VII- APPENDICES 24 CAGE project final evaluation O- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions · The four objectives set are met both quantitatively and qualitatively. · The starting hypothesis of the project, that well stimulated community participation could lead to better results in the promotion of girls education is verified and it is correct. In fact, CAGE project has succeeded in arousing a high community mobilization and a strong commitment of CRL (Local representative Committees) and CCEF with meaningful results in their quantity and quality, in their dimension and depth. · This ability to stimulate the local/social support and mobilization comes from CAGE approach that is the entire process and steps leading to the set up of CRL and CCEF, the vision analysis and strategies, up to the micro project funding, all this back up with a very good social communication. · In this process, the set up of CRL and their composition played an important role. Truly the intension is a representative committee. Initially the social communication showed that members would be like pioneers, with no specific advantages, but more sacrifices and a lot of work to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Ketou
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN =-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-= MINISTERE DE LA PROSPECTIVE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT ET DE L’EVALUATION DE L’ACTION PUBLIQUE (MPDEAP) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE L’ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE (INSAE) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= MONOGRAPHIE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DIRECTION DES ETUDES DEMOGRAPHIQUES Décembre 2008 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX ............................................................................................................ vi LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ........................................................................................................ x PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... xi NOTE METHODOLOGIQUE SUR LE RGPH-3 .................................................................. xiii SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE KETOU DANS LE BENIN .......................................... 1 SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DANS LE DEPARTEMENT DU PLATEAU ............................................................................................... 2 1- GENERALITES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1-1 Présentation de la commune .................................................................................................. 3 1-1-1 Le relief ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Benin: Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Benin: Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness DREF operation Operation n° MDRBJ014; Date of Issue: 27 August 2014 Glide ° Date of disaster: 20 July 2014 Operation start date: 25 August 2014 Operation end date: 27 November ( 3 months) Host National Society(ies): Benin Red Cross Society Operation budget: CHF 50,204 Number of people affected: 14 Zones at risk Number of people assisted: One Million (indirect) 141,299 (direct) N° of National Societies involved in the operation: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Luxembourg Red Cross and Netherlands Red Cross N° of other partner organizations involved in the operation: Ministry of Health, Ministry of the Interior (through the ANPC), Plan Benin and United Nations Children’s Fund A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster In February 2014, there was an outbreak of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Guinea, which has spread to Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone causing untold hardship and hundreds of deaths in these countries. As of 27 February 2015, a total of 23,694 cases, and 9,589 deaths, which were attributed to the EVD, had been recorded across the most affected countries of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), an outbreak of the EVD was also reported, but is considered of a different origin than that which has affected West Africa. Benin, with a population of 10,051,000 (UNCDP 2014) shares a border with Nigeria, which has been affected by the EVD, and therefore the risks presented by the epidemic to the country are high.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Risks Factors of Porcine Cysticercosis in Southern Benin Based Meat Inspection Records
    International Research Journal of Microbiology (IRJM) (ISSN: 2141-5463) Vol. 4(8) pp. 188-196, September, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/irjm.2013.043 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJM Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Spatial distribution and risks factors of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin based meat inspection records Judicaël S. E. Goussanou ab* , T. Marc Kpodekon ab , Claude Saegerman c, Eric Azagoun a, A. K. Issaka Youssao a, Souaïbou Farougou a, Nicolas Praet d, Sarah Gabriël d., Pierre Dorny d, Nicolas Korsak e aDepartment of animal Production and Heath, Ecole Polytechnique of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin bLaboratory of Applied Biology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin cDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Research Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Sciences (UREAR-ULg), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium dDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium eFood Sciences Department, Faculty of veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] : Tel: 0022995700449/ 0022997168992 Abstract Porcine cysticercosis, which is widely distributed in Africa, causes financial losses and diseases among humans. To control the disease in an area, it is important to know the geographical distribution. In this study, spatial distribution of porcine cysticercosis in southern Benin was performed. By using the number of partial organ seizures at meat inspection, the study has revealed high risks of porcine cysticercosis in administrative districts of Aplahoue, Dogbo, Klouekanme and Lokossa. The proportion of seizures ranged from 0.06% for neck muscles to 0.69% for tongues.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I : Etat Des Lieux
    République Burkina Faso République du Bénin du Niger Fonds européen de développement Programme Régional Parc W / ECOPAS (Ecosystèmes Protégés en Afrique Sahélienne) 7 ACP RPR 742 "Plan d'Aménagement et de Gestion de la Réserve de Biosphère Transfrontalière W - 2006-2010" Volume I : Etat des lieux VERSION FINALE Mai 2005 Programme Régional Parc W / ECOPAS 7 ACP RPR 742 "Plan d'Aménagement et de Gestion de la Réserve de Biosphère Transfrontalière W - 2006-2010" janvier - novembre 2004 Réalisé par le Programme Régional Parc W / ECOPAS en collaboration avec les Administrations de tutelles et les Communautés riveraines , avec l’appui technique de : Alain BILLAND, Marie Noël DE VISSCHER, KIDJO Ferdinand Claude, Albert COMPAORE, Amadou BOUREIMA, Alexandra MOREL, Laye CAMARA ; Frank CZESNIK, Nestor René AHOYO ADJOVI Adresse : Consultant Bureau de Coordination du Programme Consortium ECOPAS : Régional Parc W / ECOPAS Agrer S.A., Agriconsulting S.p.A., 01 BP 1607 CIRAD, GFA Terra Systems GmbH, Imm. PPI BF face BIB avenue du Temple Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Ouagadougou 01 Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Burkina Faso Tél./Fax: (+226) 335261 s/c GFA Terra Systems GmbH [email protected] Eulenkrugstr. 82 D – 22359 Hamburg Tel.: (+49)40-60306-111 Fax: (+49)40-60306-119 E-Mail: [email protected] Plan d'Aménagement et de Gestion de la RBT W (Bénin, Burkina Faso, Niger) Etat des lieux – Version finale ETAT DES LIEUX DE LA RESERVE DE BIOSPHERE TRANSFRONTALIERE W Sommaire 1 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 10 2 ELABORATION DU PLAN D’AMENAGEMENT ET DE GESTION............................... 14 3 HISTORIQUE........................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 HISTORIQUE DE LA PROTECTION DE LA NATURE ET DES PARCS NATIONAUX......................
    [Show full text]