DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Department of Transportation District Four DESIGN-BUILD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Department of Transportation District Four DESIGN-BUILD Florida Department of Transportation District Four DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for Phase 3A-1 I-95 Express Lanes and Ramp Signals From South of Broward Blvd. to North of Commercial Blvd. Financial Project Number: 433108-4-52-01 Ramp Signals From Hallandale Beach Blvd. to Davie Blvd. Financial Project Number: 428009-1-52-01 Federal Aid Project Number: 0951-671-I Contract Number: E4Q32 Request for Proposal (DRAFT) I-95 Express Lanes – Phase 3A-1 From South of Broward Blvd. to north of Commercial Blvd. August 18, 2014 Table of Contents I. Introduction. ................................................................................................................... 1 A. Design-Build Responsibility .............................................................................. 4 B. Department Responsibility ................................................................................. 6 II. Schedule of Events. ......................................................................................................... 6 III. Threshold Requirements. .............................................................................................. 8 A. Qualifications .................................................................................................... 8 B. Joint Venture Firm ............................................................................................. 8 C. Price Proposal Guarantee ................................................................................... 9 D. Pre-Proposal Meeting ......................................................................................... 9 E. Technical Proposal Page-Turn Meeting .............................................................. 9 F. Question and Answer Session .......................................................................... 10 G. Protest Rights................................................................................................... 10 H. Non-Responsive Proposals ............................................................................... 11 I. Waiver of Irregularities .................................................................................... 11 J. Modification or Withdrawal of Technical Proposal........................................... 12 K. Department’s Responsibilities .......................................................................... 12 L. Design-Build Contract ..................................................................................... 12 IV. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program. .................................................. 13 A. DBE Availability Goal Percentage: .................................................................. 13 B. DBE Supportive Services Providers: ................................................................ 13 C. Bidders Opportunity List:................................................................................. 13 V. Project Requirements and Provisions for Work. ....................................................... 13 A. Governing Regulations: ................................................................................... 13 B. Innovative Aspects: .......................................................................................... 17 C. Geotechnical Services: ..................................................................................... 20 D. Department Commitments: .............................................................................. 20 E. Environmental Permits: .................................................................................... 30 F. Railroad Coordination: .................................................................................... 31 G. Survey: ............................................................................................................ 38 H. Verification of Existing Conditions: ................................................................. 38 I. Submittals: ....................................................................................................... 38 J. Contract Duration: ........................................................................................... 42 K. Project Schedule: ............................................................................................. 42 L. Key Personnel/Staffing: ................................................................................... 44 M. Meetings and Progress Reporting: .................................................................... 44 N. Public Involvement: ......................................................................................... 45 Page i Request for Proposal (DRAFT) I-95 Express Lanes – Phase 3A-1 From South of Broward Blvd. to north of Commercial Blvd. August 18, 2014 O. Quality Management Plan (QMP): ................................................................... 47 P. FHWA Project Management Plan (PMP) / Financial Plan ................................ 48 Q. Liaison Office: ................................................................................................. 48 R. Engineers Field Office: Not Applicable ............................................................ 48 S. Schedule of Values: ......................................................................................... 48 T. Computer Automation:..................................................................................... 48 U. Construction Engineering and Inspection: ........................................................ 49 V. Testing:............................................................................................................ 49 W. Value Added: ................................................................................................... 49 X. Adjoining Construction Projects:...................................................................... 50 Y. Design Issue Escalation: .................................................................................. 51 Z. Construction Clarification, Conflict Resolution, and Issue Escalation: .............. 51 AA. Incident Management Responsibilities: ............................................................ 52 BB. Service Patrol Responsibilities: ........................................................................ 53 CC. Emergency Management Responsibilities: ....................................................... 53 DD. Routine Maintenance Responsibilities: ............................................................. 53 VI. Design and Construction Criteria. .............................................................................. 55 A. General: ........................................................................................................... 55 B. Vibration and Settlement Monitoring: .............................................................. 56 C. Geotechnical Services: ..................................................................................... 56 D. Utility Coordination: ........................................................................................ 60 E. Roadway Plans: ............................................................................................... 62 F. Geometric: ....................................................................................................... 66 G. Design Documentation, Computations, and Quantities: .................................... 69 H. Structure Plans: ................................................................................................ 69 I. Specifications: ................................................................................................. 81 J. Shop Drawings: ............................................................................................... 82 K. Sequence of Construction:................................................................................ 82 L. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP): ............................................ 86 M. Temporary Traffic Control Plan: ...................................................................... 86 N. Environmental Services/Permits/Mitigation: .................................................... 91 O. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans: ............................................................. 95 P. Signalization Plans: .......................................................................................... 97 Q. Lighting Plans: ................................................................................................. 97 R. Landscape Design ............................................................................................ 99 S. Tolling Infrastructure Requirements: .............................................................. 103 T. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Plans: .............................................. 104 U. Traffic Monitoring Sites: ................................................................................ 105 VII. Technical Proposal Requirements: ........................................................................... 107 A. General: ......................................................................................................... 107 B. Submittal Requirements: ................................................................................ 107 C. Evaluation Criteria: ........................................................................................ 110 D. Final Selection Formula: ................................................................................ 113
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida Department of Transportation FDOT Broward County Traffic
    Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS 3400 West Commercial Boulevard KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. GOVERNOR Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 SECRETARY For Immediate Release Contact: Guillermo Canedo Friday, February 21, 2020 (954) 777-4090 [email protected] FDOT Broward County Traffic Impact Report February 21, 2020 through February 28, 2020 Fort Lauderdale – Construction and maintenance-related lane closures on state highways in Broward County are expected during the week of February 21-28. Weather permitting, work will be done at the following locations throughout the county. For updated lane closure information, please refer to www.d4fdot.com. Follow us on Twitter @MyFDOT_SEFL. Please note, any full road, ramp or bridge closures have been highlighted below. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Interstates 1. I-95 from south of Hollywood Boulevard in the City of Hollywood to south of Broward Boulevard in the City of Fort Lauderdale and I-595 from I-95 to SR-7 in the Town of Davie (95 Express Phase 3C) Description: Work on this 9-mile 95 Express project includes extending the existing Express Lanes north from just south of Hollywood Boulevard to just south of Broward Boulevard in Broward County. One lane will be added and the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane will be converted to create two Express Lanes in each direction. The number of General Use lanes will remain the same. Other project improvements include construction of I-95/I-595 Direct Connectors between 95 Express Lanes and I-595, as well as reconstruction, milling, resurfacing and widening of I-595 from SR-7 to I-95 and along I-95 from south of Hollywood Boulevard to south of Broward Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • FDOT Broward County Traffic Impact Report CONSTRUCTION
    For Immediate Release Contact: Guillermo Canedo July 5, 2019 (954) 777-4090 [email protected] FDOT Broward County Traffic Impact Report July 5-12, 2019 Fort Lauderdale – Construction and maintenance-related lane closures on state highways in Broward County are expected during the week of July 5-12, 2019. Weather permitting, work will be done at the following locations throughout the county. For updated lane closure information, please refer to www.d4fdot.com. Follow us on Twitter @MyFDOT_SEFL. Please note, any full road, ramp or bridge closures have been highlighted below. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Interstates 1. I-95 from south of Hollywood Boulevard to south of Broward Boulevard (95 Express Phase 3C) Traffic Impact: No anticipated closures. Description: Work on this 9-mile 95 Express project includes extending the existing Express Lanes north from just south of Hollywood Boulevard to just south of Broward Boulevard in Broward County. One lane will be added and the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane will be converted to create two Express Lanes in each direction. The number of General Use lanes will remain the same. Other project improvements include construction of I-95/I-595 Direct Connectors between 95 Express Lanes and I-595, as well as reconstruction, milling, resurfacing and widening of I-595 from SR-7 to I-95 and along I-95 from south of Hollywood Boulevard to south of Broward Boulevard. Additional work includes bridge widening along I- 95 at several locations, painting of 17 bridges within project limits, I-95/SR 84 interchange modifications, Integrated Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Installation, including cameras, detectors and dynamic message signs to optimize traffic operations, tolling/gantry construction, ramp signalization implementation at the interchanges, lighting, signage and drainage installation and construction of shoulder–mounted sound walls and retaining walls.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Blocks
    CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 6 UNDERSTANDING THE CONTEXT 7 Review of Existing Plans and Studies 7 The Study Area 10 Multimodal Districts 10 Who Lives There? 12 How Do They Live? 18 Where Are They Going? 26 How Are They Getting There? 30 What Does the Future Look Like? 45 Summary 51 NEEDS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 53 COMPLETE STREETS STANDARDS 53 Connectivity and Quality 53 Streets Typology 54 Complete Streets Network 63 Level of Service Standards 63 IDENTIFICATION OF MULTI-MODAL NEEDS 69 PRIORITIZATION OF MULTI-MODAL NEEDS 69 COST ESTIMATES 73 APPENDIX A: MAPS 74 APPENDIX B: PROJECT NEEDS LIST WITH COST ESTIMATES 79 APPENDIX C: PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA 125 TABLES FIGURES Table 1. People Per Acre 12 Figure 1. Multimodal Connectivity Districts 11 Table 2. Broward County Transit Routes 32 Figure 2. People Per Acre 13 Table 3. Sun Trolley Routes 33 Figure 3. Population that is 18 and Under Per Acre 15 Table 4. Limited-Access Highways in Fort Lauderdale 40 Figure 4. Population that is 65 and Older Per Acre 17 Table 5. Major East-West Corridors (Non-Interstates) 40 Figure 5. Downtown Riverfront Development 18 Table 6. Major North-South Corridors Figure 6. Existing Land Use 19 (Non-Interstates) 40 Figure 7. Single-Family Home 20 Table 7. Pedestrian Connectivity 42 Figure 8. Multi-Family Residences 20 Table 8. Bicycle Connectivity (Arterials and Collectors) 43 Figure 9. Residential Land Use 21 Table 9. Transit Connectivity 44 Figure 10. Land Use Related to Employment 23 Table 10. 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Figure 11. Income and Car Ownership 25 Roadway Projects within Fort Lauderdale 47 Figure 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland Park Boulevard Alternatives Analysis Opbshort Term Improvements Technical Memorandum
    June 2013 Oakland Park Boulevard Alternatives Analysis OPBShort Term Improvements Technical Memorandum Financial Project ID: 4295691-22-01 Florida Department of Transportation District Four For more information about the Oakland Park Boulevard Alternatives Analysis Project please contact: Khalilah Ffrench, PE Florida Department of Transportation, District Four 3400 W. Commercial Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-3421 (954) 677‐7898 [email protected] Mr. Vikas Jain, AICP, GISP T.Y. Lin International 1501 NW 49 Street, Suite 203 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (954) 308‐3353 [email protected] i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Need for the Project ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Route 72 Bus Schedule ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Existing Route 72 Bus Schedule .................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Existing Route Schedule Analysis .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Alternatives Analysis Report
    South Florida East Coast Corridor FINAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT October 2011 Federal Aid No. FTAX004 FTA Grant No. FL-90-X372-07 FM No. 417031-1-22-01 Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties, Florida Contract: C-8F66 2 SFECCTA Alternatives Analysis Report SOUTH FLORIDA EAST COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT ANALYSIS Lead Agencies: Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration Title of the Proposed Action: South Florida East Coast Corridor Transit Analysis ABSTRACT: This report documents the development and analysis of alternatives for implementing reliable, high quality transit in the 85-mile Florida East Coast corridor located in southeast Florida. The purpose of the project is to increase transit options for travel in southeast Florida, support the Eastward Ho! Initiative of the counties in the region, encourage redevelopment and economic growth in the coastal cities, and supplement the existing highway network. These goals were developed in cooperation with the counties, cities, metropolitan planning organizations, regional planning organizations, civic and business organizations, and the general public. The study has proceeded in two phases. The first phase led to the development of modally generic alternatives that were refined into four, specific modal alternatives in Phase 2, which is the subject of this report. These four alternatives: TSM, BRT, Integrated Rail “DMU”, and Integrated Rail “Push- Pull,” were defined and compared against both a No Build alternative and against each other. Each of these alternatives incorporates new transit service along the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) cor- ridor with existing transit service operated by each of the three counties in the region (Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade) and Tri-Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of the Five Vacant Commercial Sites Located at 6650 W. Commercial Boulevard Lauderhill, Fl 33319 ( Our File #18-28
    AN APPRAISAL OF THE FIVE VACANT COMMERCIAL SITES LOCATED AT 6650 W. COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD LAUDERHILL, FL 33319 ( OUR FILE #18-2893) FOR MS. MONTI LARSEN CHILDREN'S SERVICES COUNCIL OF BROWARD COUNTY 6600 W. COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD LAUDERHILL, FL 33319 BY HOWARD L. ALEXANDER 1478 NE 55TH STREET FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33334 HOWARD L. ALEXANDER REAL ESTATE VALUATION 1478 N.E. 55th Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334 Phone- 954-608-7242 E-mail - [email protected] July 22, 2018 Ms. Monti Larsen Children's Services Council of Broward County 6600 W. Commercial Boulevard Lauderhill, FL 33319 Dear Ms. Larsen: In accordance with your request, an appraisal of the five vacant commercially-zoned sites located at 6650 W. Commercial Boulevard, Lauderhill, FL 33319. The property is legally described elsewhere in this report. The type of value estimated is the market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property as of July 19, 2018. The value opinion reported is qualified by certain definitions, limiting conditions and certifications which are set forth in this report. An inspection has been made of the subject property by Howard L. Alexander, Associate Appraiser, and all data considered pertinent to the making of the appraisal has been investigated and analyzed. The results of the investigation together with conclusions can be found in the report following. This is an appraisal report conforming to all USPAP and Appraisal Institute standards and guidelines. Ms. Monti Larsen Page 2 July 22, 2018 Other than what is stated in the Limiting Conditions section of this report, we have applied no hypothetical conditions or extraordinary assumptions in this appraisal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2035 Broward Transformation Long Range Transportaiton Plan
    FINAL REPORT BROWARD MPO Commissioner Daniel J. Stermer Chair, District 5, City of Weston Mayor Rae Carole Armstrong Vice Chair, District 3, City of Plantation Gregory Stuart Executive Director Michael Ronskavitz Deputy Executive Director District 1 Commissioner Roy Gold City of Coral Springs Commissioner Harry Dressler City of Tamarac Commissioner Joseph Varsallone Alternate, City of Margate Commissioner Gary Frankel Alternate, City of North Lauderdale Commissioner David Rosenof Alternate, City of Parkland District 2 Commissioner George Brummer City of Pompano Beach Commissioner Bill Ganz City of Deerfi eld Beach Mayor Marilyn Gerber Alternate, City of Coconut Creek Commissioner Sandy Johnson Alternate, City of Lighthouse Point Commissioner Birute Ann Clottey Alternate, Town of Lauderdale-by-the-Sea Vice Mayor Dan Dodge Alternate, Town of Hillsboro Beach District 3 Vice Mayor Charlotte Rodstrom City of Fort Lauderdale Vice Mayor Bruce Roberts City of Fort Lauderdale Mayor Richard J. Kaplan City of Lauderhill Commissioner Lawrence A. Sofi eld City of Sunrise Commissioner David W. Shomers Alternate, City of Lauderdale Lakes Commissioner Allegra Webb Murphy Alternate, City of Oakland Park Commissioner Tom Green Alternate, City of Wilton Manors Commissioner Douglas Hodgson Alternate, Village of Sea Ranch Lakes District 4 Commissioner Richard Blattner City of Hollywood Mayor Joy Cooper Alternate, City of Hallandale Mayor Anne Castro Alternate, City of Dania Beach District 5 Councilmember Bryan Caletka Town of Davie Commissioner Troy Samuels City of Miramar Mayor Frank C. Ortis City of Pembroke Pines Commissioner John Sims Alternate, City of Cooper City Commissioner Freddy Fisikelli Alternate, Town of Southwest Ranches Vice Mayor Ashira Mohammed Alternate, Town of Pembroke Park Mayor Eric H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sr 7 /Us 441 Collaborative
    THE SR 7 /US 441 COLLABORATIVE DESIGNEES AND ALTERNATES January, 2011 JURISDICTION DESIGNEE ALTERNATE Coral Springs Paul Carpenter, Senior Susan Hess, Director Transportation Planner Community Development Community Development 9530 W. Sample Road 9530 W. Sample Road Coral Springs, FL 33065 Coral Springs, FL 33065 (P) 954-344-1114 (P) 954-344-1159 (F) 954-344-1181 (F) 954-344-1181 [email protected] [email protected] Ft. Lauderdale Commissioner Bobby DuBose Michael Ciesielski, Senior Planner 100 N. Andrews Avenue Planning & Zoning Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 700 NW 19th Ave (P) 954-828-5011 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33305 (F) 954-828-5667 (P) 954-828-5256 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Hollywood Commissioner Fran Russo Leander Hamilton, Planning P.O. Box 229045 Administrator Hollywood, FL 33022-9045 Planning and Development (P) 954-921-3321 Services (H) 954-987-3449 2600 Hollywood Boulevard, (F) 954-921-3386 Hollywood, FL 33020 [email protected] (P) 954-921-3442 [email protected] [email protected] Lauderdale Lakes Commissioner Benjamin Commissioner Edwina Coleman Williams Sr. 4300 NW 36th Street 4300 NW 36th Street Lauderdale Lakes, FL 33319 Lauderdale Lakes, FL 33319 (P) 954-535-2730 (P) 954-535-2730 (F) 954-731-5857 (F) 954-731-5857 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Miramar Gus Zambrano, Director Lorri Hall, Senior Planner Economic Development & Community Development (Offices are closed
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets Policy 1.1
    Acknowledgements The City of Fort Lauderdale’s Complete Streets Manual was established based on the Broward County Complete Streets Guidelines developed by the Broward MPO, with additional influences by the New Haven, CT Complete Streets Guidebook, and the Philadelphia Complete Streets Design Handbook. Broward County’s Complete Streets Guidelines document was funded through a Transforming Our Community’s Health (TOUCH) grant, which is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Community Transformation Grants to support public health efforts to reduce chronic disease, promote healthier lifestyles, reduce health disparities and control health care spending. The Broward County Complete Streets Guidelines were adapted from the Los Angeles County Model Design Manual for Living Streets. Special acknowledgement is made to all of the hard working committee members that spent many hours developing the manuals that were used to develop this one including the Broward Complete Streets Initiative Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Los Angeles County Complete Streets Committee, Philadelphia and the New Haven Complete Streets Steering Committees. Foreword The City of Fort Lauderdale has adopted a Resolution to follow Smart Growth Principles in decisions being made within the city on investments and project reviews. An important tool to implement Smart Growth Principles is a Complete Streets Manual. Complete Streets are an essential ingredient in creating livable, walkable neighborhoods and reconnecting the community with destinations. The City’s efforts to create a multimodal, pedestrian-friendly community accentuated by the Fast Forward Fort Lauderdale Visioning Process together with the regional efforts to implement Complete Streets, has driven the City to create its own Complete Streets Manual based on the Broward County Complete Streets Guidelines with influences also from the cities of New Haven, CT and Philadelphia, PA Complete Streets Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • OPPORTUNITY ZONE INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS Tamarac, Florida Miami–Fort Lauderdale–West Palm Beach Metro Area WHY INVEST in TAMARAC, FLORIDA?
    OPPORTUNITY ZONE INVESTMENT PROSPECTUS Tamarac, Florida Miami–Fort Lauderdale–West Palm Beach Metro Area WHY INVEST IN TAMARAC, FLORIDA? Tamarac is Open for Business Situated in the heart of Broward County in South Florida between the Florida Everglades and the Atlantic Ocean, Tamarac is a rapidly growing and changing city. Tamarac’s residential population has grown by 16% since 2000 as part of the South Florida region’s population surge. Originally a retirement community, Tamarac is becoming a younger city with a decreasing median age as new families are added to the community, and median incomes are rising as well. We are a multicultural, multigenerational thriving community at the heart of a metro area with 6 million people. We’re an agile and financially resilient community with a central location and untold potential. The business community is investing heavily in Tamarac. In the last few years, developers have added more than 1,300 new residential units here, and several hundred more are in the pipeline. New hotels are currently being constructed, and a major mixed-use project known as “Tamarac Village” is under construction that will create a new downtown area for our City. We’ve had several major multi-million dollar corporate expansions recently in our Commerce Park, as well as a major new spec industrial project breaking ground totaling 350,000 square feet. With development booming in Tamarac, we’re focusing our economic development efforts on our commercial corridors and revitalizing aging and underutilized shopping centers. One of the City’s targeted commercial redevelopment areas, Four Corners Shopping District, falls within our federally designated Opportunity Zone (also designated for the federal New Market Tax Credit and Community Development Block Grant programs).
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Transportation/Florida's Turnpike
    Florida Department of Transportation/Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise RON DESANTIS Turkey Lake Service Plaza | Mile Post 263 | Bldg. #5315 KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. GOVERNOR P.O. Box 613069, Ocoee, Florida 34761 SECRETARY For Immediate Release Contact: Ivette Ruiz-Paz June 11, 2021 (954) 934-1289 | [email protected] South Florida and Treasure Coast Weekly Lane Closures and Work Zone Advisory FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise announces lane closures and work zone information for construction and maintenance projects in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Martin and St. Lucie counties, for the week beginning Sunday, June 13. Motorists should drive with caution through the work zones and adhere to posted detour signs and speed limits. Please pay special attention to the closures noted in red. For additional information, please contact Community Outreach Specialist Yasir Mercado at 954-934- 1138 or [email protected]. Additional project information can be found on the project websites at www.floridasturnpike.com. TURNPIKE EXTENSION/SR 821 (Mileposts 0 to 47) MIAMI-DADE & BROWARD COUNTIES TURNPIKE EXTENSION/SR 821 RESURFACING PROJECT FROM S. DIXIE HIGHWAY/US 1 TO SW 112 AVENUE/SR 989 Northbound and southbound Florida’s Turnpike/SR 821 between S. Dixie Highway/US 1 and Biscayne Drive/SW 288 Street Overnight single lane closures, 9:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m., Sunday, June 13, and nightly through Thursday, June 17. Northbound and southbound Florida’s Turnpike/SR 821 between Biscayne Drive/SW 288 Street and SW 112 Avenue/SR 989 Overnight single lane closures, 9 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Laderdale-By-The-Sea
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Broward County MPO Community Background Reports 11-1-2011 Town of Laderdale-By-The-Sea Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/mpo_broward Recommended Citation "Town of Laderdale-By-The-Sea" (2011). Broward County. 11. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/mpo_broward/11 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the MPO Community Background Reports at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Broward County by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Community Background Report Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea Boundaries North: Pine Avenue South: Flamingo Drive East: Atlantic Ocean West: Intracoastal Waterway Community Type: Municipality Report Last Updated: November,2011 History The Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea was first incorporated in 1927, but its charter was revoked by the state in 1933, during the Great Depression. It remained under county jurisdiction until a new charter was instituted in 1947 and validated in 1949.1 The town considers the date of its founding to be 1947.2 The entire town is located on a long, thin barrier island separated from the mainland by the Intracoastal Waterway.3 It is interesting to note that the town has a total area of 1.5 square miles, of which 0.73 square miles (59.35 percent) is water.4 Lauderdale-By-The-Sea’s shoreline is popular with beach divers, due to a unique snorkel trail and a coral reef, all within 100 yards of the beach.5 The waters just off the town’s shore are also home to the marine ruins of the SS Copenhagen, a 19th-century steamer that sank in 1900.
    [Show full text]