DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Peekskill Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City ofPeekskill Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Adopted: City ofPeekskill Common Council, January 26,2004 Approved: NYS Secretary ofState Randy A. Daniels, July 6, 2004 Concurred: u.S. Office ofOcean and Coastal Resource Management, January 14, 2005 This Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) has been adopted and approved in accordance with provisions of the Waterfront Revitalization ofCoastal Areas and InlandWaterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42) and its implementing regulations (6 NYCRR 601). Federal concurrence on the incorporation ofthis Local Waterfront Revitalization Program into the New York State Coastal Management Program as a routine program change has been obtained in accordance with provisions of the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-583), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR 923). The preparation of this program was financially aided by a federal grant from the U.S. Department ofCommerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office ofOcean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. Federal Grant No. NA-82-AA-D-CZ068. The New York State Coastal Management Program and the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are administered by the New York State Department of State, Division ofCoastal Resources, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231. ~ J~JJ STATE 0'- NEW Yo<>. OE"'AI'ITMEHT 0 .. STATE 4' SUHc Sn.Ef:T Al.!l..... ~. NY '22:)1<>00' :>£0""£ E: PAT"., R".OY" 0..,.. C\.S ~,- ""'_,.... 0' $.... II""..-abl~ John G 1',_1, Mayor "I) of Pcehk,1l C,ty 11011. MO Mal" Str.,l 1·<..,~s~,Il, "Iy 11)566 I am I'Ic~d In ,,,fi,rm ~"Ll that 1 ha\~ ~ppn»~d tile ('n)' of l'cdsk,ll Local Walerff()l11 R.'l:ah""'tliln 1',OlU"'" (I.WRP). pUr;u3nl h) lhe Wa[erfront Re"lah>..aooll of CooStal A",a, and Inland \.\ """" or< Act b~I)"". "ho p.l1lctpatcJ In the p<epal1loon "f th .. pr<:>l;J'm " 10 be comrr""JJ(d fOf d"'d"Plng l co<"p,chcn,"e ,nlem'"Ole'i",1 ",.""gem,nl progl1lm lh:ll 1"0mo\"" Ihe bal",,,oo I"C5I:f\'aBon, mhancemcm. and LIlli""",,",,, ,,[,he rown\ \':110.111" 'COOU'CC$ I am nQIJf),,,g slale 311cn~lr, Iha' I ha\'c "lJllhJ\M Y"'" L\\ RP and am ....J>u'ng lllem lhat If""f a,MIl;e' mu,l "" un,lcrtalen ,n a mann...,. conS'II.:n!. to the rna, '"'um ~,l~nl 1""doc,,!>le. "nh Ie.., IJrogrJ"" I look fOrward Ie> "o'kmS ""lh )'uu as )"" ""d~a"" ,,\ ,e' ,fall,e ond prote"' ,"our .....al",ii-unt. Randy A Ihl1ld.. ItAD mu go _M•••...... y. .-... ,.."""""," •.."" ...... UNITED STATES DE~ARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Dcu...c and Atmospheric Adm,nistratloft N~ IION~l OCE~" SHlVlCE OF'ICf (If OCl"' A"O COAS lA, R~SOV~C~ .... ~.'OE..U" S, ••' ".....',.M' "0 JAN 1 4 2005 • DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL PROORAMS \lr, George){ SlaftonJ 'JIJI 2 ' D,rttlor. 01 yo 'i01l "f ('o~'lal Rc'\Ourc{'s "ew Yor~ DeP~1I1mcol of Siaic RECEiVED '11 Siale S!rc<:t Albany. :"iew York 12231 Dear Mr. $taftord: "I hr Office of Ocean and Coasl,,1 Resource Managemcm (OC'RM) concurs "lIh your rc'lUCSI to IIleOl1'or'"te lhe CIt)" of I'cekd::J II tocal Walcrfront RCYllnhznllon l'rog",m (tWRI') IntO th(, I'ocw YOll State Coast~( Managemem Progr;,m (NYSCI\.H') as a ROIIURC Progrom Change IRK). We dId nOl receIVe ao)" comffiCms on )"ourn;que.'1. TIlls approval a>surnc, you ,,,II melle no ftlrther ehal1l!~'S to the document m addition to the ones submittctl. After analyzing your RP'C submission. we haw concluded that the submrtted enforcc"blc policin fur lhe City .)f Pe,,~s~ill LWRP. as h'K'tl 1>0;1<",. "1'1: RPCs "rnJ OCRM "pp,..-,"{', Ihem as enforttablc polic'cs of the NYSC\II' The P,·clsltll LWf/ P I'rofHJses t"-o boun..bry ehan!!~.,; to the NYSCMI' ,'lXI,tal bou!l(bry 10 encoml'as, areas that ha"e land and "aler Ibes that collid !la"c "d,rc<:1 and slgmfie"m imP-lei on the coa,tal waters of lhe State 01 l\ew Yor~. The propoScti boundary change' arc mlllor III <;cope and rcprcSCll1 funher detailing (,f the !\"YSCMi' cnru;lal hound"ry "nd are not" subSl"ntlal dl"ngc The follow,"g l'cebl,1l LWRP enfotw"bk polletc' funhcr ,peclfy ;.JYSCMP enforce"ble poltetes: 1.2.5.7.12. 14. 17. 19,20,21.22.24. and H The follo"- Ill!; P~'t:~sl, II LWRI' enforceahle pohcles "re the sa"...' as th" corrCSllonding ",YSCMI' entorceable polici<,s. e\Cept the "1:. \p(;'I1Jll0n of Policy" scctlon for each Pccls~11I LWRP enforceable policy ha~ been tC'hC<.! or funhcr speclfie<.1 6,8. II. 15. 16. 18. 23. 2~. 27 ..~o. 31. .U, 36, 37, 38. 39. .w. ·11. 42. 43, atd.u These rntston.'; fUllher <.1ellllllhc NYSC\II' enforceJble pohtes 10 be spectfte 10 the Pee~s~,11 LWRP and <.10 nOI represenl" sullslantlal chan~ 'i~w Enr"rceahlc 1'"lid~s The follow,":: !'ccksk,1 i LWI{ I' enforceable pollClcs ~re lie", c"fOlcc~blc pohcics lnal ",c,e ""'11"C,iou,l)" '" lhe -":YSCMP 7,\.19-,\, I\IB. )9C. 190. HA.and }-IA The~c neW enforccable I'olicies f'"1he, <Icl~,1 'hc NYSCMP cnfo":cahle pol,c,es '0 cre~lC policies lhal are s[JCC,fic 10 'he Peck~klll LWRP ~nJ llo nOl represem" ~ubslanual chan!o'C. lIncbapc.'1I t;lllffffable I'oliejes The follo....ing Peekskill LWI{ l' enflXccahlc polic'es arc Ihc ~ame a~ lhe NYSC \II' enfmccahlc pohcies under 19 NYCRK l'..n (,()().5: ') 10. and !J Inapl,licahle Enfl!{(tahl~ I'nljdcs The follow,"& NYSCMI' enfo=able poll'·Ie. do nOl apply and arc not a pan of Ih., Peeksk,lI LWRP 3. ~ 26,2'1...nd 12 In a"u>rdance '" 'lh the Federal Cv.a>tal .\'lallugcll){;nl RcgulallOlls. 15 c.1", R. § 9~J8~. 1-<:&:1;<1 Cnnsi.<1ency "",II apply lil the enforceable pollCtc.,; (onta,ocd In lh,· f"",l C"y of Pn'k!,klll LWI!: I' afler you publish notICe of our apprO"~1 oh" I{ "'Tlg D'\'l.\,on Chid RI.sOU!nv,'· VI I II r CV'DION Ctll M.Il, AlltJl' 11,'1; nit, 1.'1 J\ Ut I'HI\Sl\ILL LOC"'L II'A I UU"kUN'J IUClII ... UJ:...TIO.' PkO(;R....\1 II Ur.kr.,-S•• 01 W;l.P, ,,,dud'''t .11 rrop",.~ lox.l, '.~" md mr,,,! ~n lUJ".' 1!. 100 I """ Sop,,"''''' 14, 100: .., 0"1,, tn r«;.,,, ..-.J <"..."1,, «,,,,,",n" ~n II II l:Rr.AS. ~" !)<r<mb'" n. l~jll~< CO~l"1OI1 CO"<I<,I o..!o~'...o ,h. Cjl~' of ,,-ow. Til t:llF.FOIH , HI: I r RrSOt' n., ,.,,, 'no ("orr""". 1,:ounc,1 01 tho Ci'y of P«~lk,lI I>c,.by di~" Table of Contents Page SECTION I WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY A. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION L...:...J. B. REVISIONS TO THE STATE BOUNDARY L...:...J. SECTION II INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS EXISTING LAND AND WATER USES II - 3 Overview II - 3 Southern Planning Area II - 3 Central Planning Area II - 9 Northern Planning Area II - 9 Annsville Creek Planning Area II - 10 Water-Dependent and Water-Enhanced Uses II - 10 Underutilized, Abandoned or Deteriorated Sites II - 11 Southern Planning Area II - 11 Central Planning Area II - 11 Northern Planning Area II - 11 Annsville Creek Planning Area II - 12 Public Access Areas and Recreational Facilities II - 12 Existing Zoning II - 12 Historic Structures, Sites and Districts II - 17 NATURAL FEATURES II - 18 Scenic Resources and Important Vistas II - 18 Topography II - 21 Soil and Bedrock Formations II - 22 Flood Hazard Areas II - 23 Tidal and Freshwater Wetlands II - 23 Water Quality II - 24 Significant Fish and Wildlife Areas II - 25 INFRASTRUCTURE II - 38 Public Water and Sewer Service II - 38 Transportation II - 39 ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES II - 39 Underutilized and Vacant Land II - 40 Southern Planning Area II - 40 Central Planning Area II - 40 Northern Planning Area II - 41 Public Access, Recreational, Water-Dependent Use Issues II - 41 Access II - 41 Utilities II - 42 Water and Air Resources Issues II - 43 Zoning Issues II - 43 SECTION III POLICIES DEVELOPMENT POLICIES Section III - 3 FISH AND WILDLIFE POLICIES Section III - 12 FLOODING AND EROSION POLICIES. .................... .. Section III - 30 GENERAL POLICY ...................................... .. Section III - 36 PUBLIC ACCESS POLICIES Section III - 37 RECREATION POLICIES Section III - 41 HISTORIC AND SCENIC RESOURCES POLICIES Section III - 44 AGRICULTURAL LANDS POLICY Section III - 50 ENERGY AND ICE MANAGEMENT POLICIES Section III - 50 WATER AND AIR RESOURCES POLICIES ................. .. Section III - 52 SECTION IV PROPOSED LAND AND WATER USES Land Use ....................................................... .. IV - 3 Southern Planning Area ...................................... .. IV - 3 Central Planning Area IV - 4 Northern Planning Area ...................................... .. IV - 9 Annsville Creek Planning Area ................................ .. IV - 9 Proposed Public and Private Projects IV - 10 Southern Planning Area ..................................... .. IV - 10 Central Planning Area IV - 10 Northern Planning Area ..................................... .. IV - 13 Annsville Creek Planning Area ............................... .. IV - 14 Waterfront Trail Development .................................... .. IV - 14 Zoning Actions ................................................. .. IV - 15 SECTION V TECHNIOUES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM A. LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THELWRP V- 3 B. OTHER PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THELWRP V- 12 C. MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THELWRP V- 14 Procedures for Department of State and City of Peekskill Review of Federal Actions for Consistency with the LWRP V- 16 Guidelines for Notification and Review of State Agency Actions where Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs are in effect.
Recommended publications
  • Guidebook: American Revolution

    Guidebook: American Revolution

    Guidebook: American Revolution UPPER HUDSON Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site http://nysparks.state.ny.us/sites/info.asp?siteId=3 5181 Route 67 Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 Hours: May-Labor Day, daily 10 AM-7 PM Labor Day-Veterans Day weekends only, 10 AM-7 PM Memorial Day- Columbus Day, 1-4 p.m on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Phone: (518) 279-1155 (Special Collections of Bailey/Howe Library at Uni Historical Description: Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site is the location of a Revolutionary War battle between the British forces of Colonel Friedrich Baum and Lieutenant Colonel Henrick von Breymann—800 Brunswickers, Canadians, Tories, British regulars, and Native Americans--against American militiamen from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire under Brigadier General John Stark (1,500 men) and Colonel Seth Warner (330 men). This battle was fought on August 16, 1777, in a British effort to capture American storehouses in Bennington to restock their depleting provisions. Baum had entrenched his men at the bridge across the Walloomsac River, Dragoon Redoubt, and Tory Fort, which Stark successfully attacked. Colonel Warner's Vermont militia arrived in time to assist Stark's reconstituted force in repelling Breymann's relief column of some 600 men. The British forces had underestimated the strength of their enemy and failed to get the supplies they had sought, weakening General John Burgoyne's army at Saratoga. Baum and over 200 men died and 700 men surrendered. The Americans lost 30 killed and forty wounded The Site: Hessian Hill offers picturesque views and interpretative signs about the battle. Directions: Take Route 7 east to Route 22, then take Route 22 north to Route 67.
  • Ce National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    Ce National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Caldwell Residential Historic District_________________________________________ other names/site number Dorman. Washington Heights, and Steunenberg's Acreage Additions_____________________ 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by Cleveland Blvd.. Everett St.. S. Twelfth Ave. and S. Twentieth Ave. N/A not for publication city or town Caldwell__________________________ N/A vicinity state Idaho code ID county Canyon____________ code 027 zip code 83605 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria.
  • This Article Was Originally Published in a Journal Published by Elsevier

    This Article Was Originally Published in a Journal Published by Elsevier

    This article was originally published in a journal published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues that you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 71 (2007) 259e277 www.elsevier.com/locate/ecss Regional patterns and local variations of sediment distribution in the Hudson River Estuary F.O. Nitsche a,*, W.B.F. Ryan a, S.M. Carbotte a, R.E. Bell a, A. Slagle a, C. Bertinado a, R. Flood c, T. Kenna a, C. McHugh a,b a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia Univeristy, Palisades, NY 10964, USA b Queens College, City University New York, Flushing, NY, USA c Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA Received 3 November 2005; accepted 27 July 2006 Available online 2 October 2006 Abstract The Hudson River Benthic Mapping Project, funded by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, resulted in a com- prehensive data set consisting of high-resolution multibeam bathymetry, sidescan sonar, and sub-bottom data, as well as over 400 sediment cores and 600 grab samples.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form

    Forrs No. 10-300 (Rav. 10-74) -"UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS _________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_____ NAME AnacostiaHISTORIC Historic District - e ANO/OR COMMON Anacostia Historic District LOCATION STREET & NUMBER ge«erai vicinity of Union town and the V7ZM.awaj.uGriswald SubdivisionU.WL^J.VJ.OJ.WIX in^ 0VUsoutheast..U , —— - Washington.., — »——0 ---. —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Washington - ' _ • vici'NiTYOF Walter E. Faunttoy, Congressman o ~ STATE /: CODE CODE 001 District of Columbia 11 District or Columbia BCLASSIFI CATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE 3L.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE ^.MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED ^.COMMERCIAL ^.PARK —STRUCTURE . X.BOTH XWORK IN PROGRESS X-EDUCATIONAL JLPRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION .ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT X.REUGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS 2EYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC" —BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO _ MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple public and private ownership. See attached list. STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. STREET & NUMBER 6th & D Streets, N.W. CITY. TOWN STATE Washington D.C. REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites DATE February 3, 1978 ^.FEDERAL £.STATE _*COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS DC/NCPC Historic Preservation Office CITY, TOWN Washington IfDESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE J?EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED ^-UNALTERED J50RIGINALSITE J5GOOD _RUINS —ALTERED —MOVED DATE. —UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Anacostia Historic District is an area of approximately twenty squares in southeast Washington, generally encompassing Uniontown, the Griswold Subdivision, and immediately adjacent areas.
  • Precambrian and Paleozoic Geology of the Hudson Highlands

    Precambrian and Paleozoic Geology of the Hudson Highlands

    41 PRE-CAMBRIAN AND PALEOZOIC GEOLOGY OF THE HUDSON HIGHLANDS Kurt E. Lowe The City College Trip D Introduction The route of Trip D crosses the Hudson Highlands northwestward (perpen­ dicular to the structural trend) affording opportunities of studying the petrology, structure and geomorphology of the Pre-Cambrian crystallines. It then turns northeastward to reach the northern gateway of the Hudson gorge at Cornwall-on­ Hudson by following the belt of early Paleozoic sediments along the northwest border of the Highlands. These sediments and their structural relations to the Highlands crystallines are briefly examined in the field. The return leg of the trip again eros !!Ie s the Highlands (this time oblique to the structure) along the west side of the Hudson gorge to Bear Mt., where it crosses the Ri~er to Peekskill. The reader is referred to Lowe (1949, 1950) from which much of the following information has been extracted. The Hudson Highlands The Highlands are a chain of low, but rugged, mountain ranges extending about 140 miles from Reading, Pa. northeastward through northern New Jersey and southeastern New York into western. Connecticut. They are mostly Pre­ Cambrian crystallines, representing an ancient orogenic belt of Grenville (? ) sediments which were folded, faulted, metamorphosed and invaded by several igneous phases (Plate 1). The Hudson Highlands, a rather loose geographical term, refers to that portion of the mountain chain which lie s athwart the Hudson River in New York State. Geomorphology Geomorphically the Highlands are known as the Reading Prong of the New England Upland. In view of the long, continued exposure of the Highlands to subaerial erosion (perhaps since early Mesozoic times) present topographic features exhibit the effects of structural and lithologic control to a high degree.
  • Final Bayview Hunters Point Context Statement

    Final Bayview Hunters Point Context Statement

    BAYVIEW-HUNTERS POINT AREA B SURVEY TOWN CENTER ACTIVITY NODE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FINAL PREPARED BY KELLEY & VERPLANCK FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY February 11, 2010 KELLEY & VERPLANCK HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTING 2912 DIAMOND STREET #330, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 415.337.5824 // WWW.KVPCONSULTING.COM Historic Context Statement Bayview-Hunters Point: Area B Survey San Francisco, California TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 A. PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................... 3 B. DEFINITION OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA ................................................................................... 4 C. IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS AND PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANCE................................... 6 II. METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................... 11 III. IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING HISTORIC STATUS .................................................... 14 A. HERE TODAY .................................................................................................................. 14 B. 1976 CITYWIDE ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY ........................................................................... 14 C. SAN FRANCISCO ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE ....................................................................... 15 D. ARTICLE 10 OF THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CODE
  • New York State History Book

    New York State History Book

    GLENCOE New York State History•Geography•Government \ Thomas E. Gray Susan P. Owens Social Studies Teacher Social Studies Teacher DeRuyter, New York East Greenbush, New York About the Authors Thomas E. Gray is a middle school social studies teacher in the Susan P. Owens teaches seventh and eighth grade social studies DeRuyter schools located in central New York state. He has served at the Howard L. Goff Middle School in East Greenbush, New York, as consultant for the National Archives in the development of edu- just east of Albany. She has presented numerous workshops on the cational materials and document kits using primary sources. He use of historical records in the classroom for the New York State has written many grants and conducted numerous workshops Archives, New York State Historical Association, other historical funded by the Local Government Records Management and agencies, as well as for school districts. In 1992 she was the recip- Improvement Fund on the benefits and methods of teaching with ient of the Capital District Council for the Social Studies local government records. In 1990 he was presented with the Neiderberger Award for outstanding service to social studies edu- Educator of the Year Award from the central New York Council for cation. Sue was also awarded the 1995 “Archives Advocacy Award” the Social Studies. He went on to receive the New York State by the New York State Archives and Records Administration. She Council’s Distinguished Social Studies Educator Award in 1994. presently serves as the K–12 Social Studies Department Chair in Tom served for three years as the Chair of the New York State East Greenbush.
  • The Westchester Historian Index, 1990 – 2019

    The Westchester Historian Index, 1990 – 2019

    Westchester Historian Index v. 66-95, 1990 – 2019 Authors ARIANO, Terry Beasts and ballyhoo: the menagerie men of Somers. Summer 2008, 84(3):100-111, illus. BANDON, Alexandra If these walls could talk. Spring 2001, 77(2):52-57, illus. BAROLINI, Helen Aaron Copland lived in Ossining, too. Spring 1999, 75(2):47-49, illus. American 19th-century feminists at Sing Sing. Winter, 2002, 78(1):4-14, illus. Garibaldi in Hastings. Fall 2005, 81(4):105-108, 110, 112-113, illus. BASS, Andy Martin Luther King, Jr.: Visits to Westchester, 1956-1967. Spring 2018, 94(2):36-69, illus. BARRETT, Paul M. Estates of the country place era in Tarrytown. Summer 2014, 90(3):72-93, illus. “Morning” shines again: a lost Westchester treasure is found. Winter 2014, 90(1):4-11, illus. BEDINI, Silvio A. Clock on a wheelbarrow: the advent of the county atlas. Fall 2000, 76(4):100-103, illus. BELL, Blake A. The Hindenburg thrilled Westchester County before its fiery crash. Spring 2005, 81(2):50, illus. John McGraw of Pelham Manor: baseball hall of famer. Spring 2010, 86(2):36-47, illus. Pelham and the Toonerville Trolley. Fall 2006, 82(4):96-111, illus. The Pelhamville train wreck of 1885: “One of the most novel in the records of railroad disasters.” Spring 2004, 80(2):36-47, illus. The sea serpent of the sound: Westchester’s own sea monster. Summer 2016, 92(3):82-93. Thomas Pell’s treaty oak. Summer 2002, 78(3):73-81, illus. The War of 1812 reaches Westchester County.
  • Architectural and Historical Survey of the Fair Oaks Neighborhood, Muscatine, Iowa

    Architectural and Historical Survey of the Fair Oaks Neighborhood, Muscatine, Iowa

    Architectural and Historical Survey of the Fair Oaks Neighborhood, Muscatine, Iowa April 25, 2013 Prepared for: Muscatine Historic Preservation Commission Submitted by: Rebecca Lawin McCarley SPARK Consulting Davenport, Iowa www.octaspark.com Architectural and Historical Survey of the Fair Oaks neighborhood, Muscatine, Iowa April 25, 2013 Rebecca Lawin McCarley SPARK Consulting 17 Oak Lane Davenport, IA 52803 563-324-9767 www.octaspark.com Acknowledgements: City of Muscatine: DeWayne Hopkins, Mayor; Gregg Mandsager, City Administrator Project Coordinator: Jim Rudisill, Community Development Muscatine Historic Preservation Commission: Jane Reischauer (chair), Devin Pettit (vice chair), Anna Mack, Jim Schmidt, Julie Wolf Funding for this project has been graciously provided by: Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine HNI Corporation Friends of Muscatine Historic Preservation Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 II. Project Description and Methodology ......................................................................... 2 Background and previous work in Muscatine ............................................................................ 5 Description of project area ........................................................................................................ 8 Methodology for survey and identification .............................................................................. 17 III.
  • Page 1 L O N G I S L a N D M O U N T a I N E E R NEWSLETTER of THE

    Page 1 L O N G I S L a N D M O U N T a I N E E R NEWSLETTER of THE

    LONG ISLAND MOUNTAINEER NEWSLETTER OF THE ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB LONG ISLAND CHAPTER SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 1993 1994 Slate of Officers room 103. From Rt. 110 Wolf Hill Road (aka Schwab Road) is 1 mile north of Your nominating committee reports on the Northern Parkway or 1 mile south of Jericho. slate of officers and board members to be Go east on Schwab/Wolf Hill to the center presented at the September meeting. located on the north side once you pass three Additional nominations , as prescribed in the traffic lights. constitution and bylaws will be accepted at this meeting. The election will be held at the annual meeting in October at the Milleridge The Highpointers Challenge Inn. A History Making Event Please contact Bruce Marshall and his son Lance (13 President Jack Gebel Highpoints each) if you would be willing to be a State Vice President Larry Braun Coordinator for putting a team of 4 or more people on top of Secretary Delia Costello your state high point on the 29th of June 1994. This coordinated effort to summit all 50 highpoints will be Treasurer Lester Wahrenburg sponsored by a major American corporation in celebration of Governor Mike Brooks their 100th Anniversary (29 June 1894). Please make sure you have submitted your highpoint or will have done so this Board Member Ada Busso year. Finally, to get more media coverage and national Board Member Jeanne Gray involvement our vision is that the nuclear 4 person team(s) will consist of the following: Board Member Nancy Hodson (1) Highpointer Club member - coordinator? (2) An Eagle Scout - getting Boy Scout Support & Logistics The nominating committee, Herb Coles, across the country.
  • City of Peekskill Section II. Inventory and Analysis

    City of Peekskill Section II. Inventory and Analysis

    SECTION II INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS A. EXISTING LAND AND WATER USES 1. Overview The CityofPeekskill is a denselypopulatedurban areaas is apparentbyexisting land and water use patterns. The 2000 Census indicated that the total city population is 22,441. Large areas of industrial use, private institutional uses, and public open space generally characterize the waterfront area. Scattered throughout the area are small pockets of general commercial, low density residential, warehouse and distribution uses, municipal uses and vacant land. A substantial amount of underutilized industrial land and several deteriorated properties exist throughout the waterfront planning area. The Peekskill Waterfront Revitalization Area canbe divided into two land use areas: 1) the waterfront areas along the HudsonRiver andAnnsville Creek and2) the inland areas that have a direct and significant impact but are not directly located on the coastal waters. Because existing uses influence the future use and development of the area, it is important to have an understanding ofthe existing land use patterns within the area. For the purpose ofthis study, the waterfront area may be divided into four planning areas: 1) Southern, 2) Central, 3) Northern and 4) Annsville Creek. By dividing the waterfront area, the City is able to develop more specific planning strategies and policies specific to the conditions and needs within each area. Existing land use patterns are presented on the attached maps. a. Southern Plannin2 Area - The Southern Planning Area begins on the west side ofLower South Street paralleling the Metro North railroad tracks at the City limits. The properties on the western side ofLower South Street and to the east ofthe railroad tracks are characterized by a concentration ofheavy industrial uses including utilities, manufacturing and outdoor storage (scrap metal, automobile and used machinery parts and contractors' materials and construction materials).
  • Nys Storm Surge Zones.Pdf

    Nys Storm Surge Zones.Pdf

    O R O B l l i L L k l A l R N a O A I W T A M Wappingers Poughquag N Ulstervill e Pine Bush Syl van Falls East Lake D U Wappinger A LS Marlboro N T Lake t E Wallkill r u B O R e o R g r U A in p PAWLING N p S R G p E a Y W Quaker Wappingers DE POT HILL L k I e STORMV ILLE e Hill T A r STATE M ULTIP LE C R Falls US E AREA N Woodinville STEWA RT A MMUNITION Hughsonville U CRAWFORD O H C T Pawling STORAGE ANNEX NEWBURGH R O L C SHA- WA N-GA Thompson Ridge WAPPINGER A Stormville (US ARMY) N I VALLE Y IN R Chadwick Middle O M E R R T Lake T Whaley Lake Whaley FIRST US ARM Y V E E ill I T k Lake Orange Hope R M h ] s C COMMUNICATIONS VERPLANCK-STONY K ILL i T Walden F Lake D FACILITY STATE E NV IRONM ENTA L T [ E Bullville EDUCATION CENTER 16 E Orange Lake R M H I T N N MONTGOMERY Balmville Brockway Brinckerhoff 15 A R 12 L O Fishkill N Holmes N Coldenham Gardnertown 13 CRANB ERRY MOUNTA IN 6 10 STATE WILDLIFE EAST FISHKILL O 11 Black Patterson MANAGEMENT AREA Montgomery 7 8 Glenham Pond WHITE P OND S TATE O C r MULTIP LE USE AREA Circleville 5 k 17 R e Y e re FISHKILL T v 17 i R C Ludingtonvill e U E R Morrison White B ll ANIMAL IMPORT CENTER N ki M ORANGE Heights A ish Pond (FE DE RA L) Newburgh D F Beacon COUNTY HESS WALLKILL US ARM Y WAS HINGTONS HE ADQUA RTE RS UTC STEWA RT INTERNATIONAL STATE HIS TORIC SITE D 119 HIGHLAND LA KES M RESE RVATIOLaNke A L BIG BUCK MOUNTA IN N I (NYS DOT) Washington SOUTH B EACON PUT STATE M ULTIP LE STATE PA RK A MOUNTAIN R (Undev) T US E AREA l (1610') Towners il Silver 18 lk STATE F IRE TOWER KENT Putnam