DOCSLIB.ORG

U*-*" Cn TO, \Ir I WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 Ao Afi H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U*-* I I I I I I RESERVED FOR PROJECT LOGO/HEADING I I I 1 I I v L.. ORIGINAL : English COUNTRYAIOTF: Tanzania Proiect Name: CDTI Tunduru focus Approval vearz 2004 Launchins vear: 2005 Reportins Period: From: l't Januaryr2007 To: 31't December 2007 (Month/Year) ( Month/Year) Proiectyearofthis report: (circleone) I 2 13] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Date submitted: January,2008 NGDO partner: Sightsavers International ANNUAL PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO TECHNICAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (TCC) DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: To APOC Management by 3l Januarv for March TCC meeting To APOC Management by 31 Julv for September TCC meeting AFRTCAN PROGRAMME FOR ONCHOCERCIASTS CONTROL (APOC) HL .L u- r tcce6 rsb' (0P' AfiC: t 1 rF\r lrt0ir Afi) Fo Gluu*-*" cn TO, \iR I WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 Ao Afi H. ANNUAL PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT TO TECHNTCAL CONSULTATTVE COrVrVtrrEE (TCC) ENDORSEMENT Please confirm you have read this report by signing in the appropriate space. OFFICERS to sign the report: Country: Tanzania National Coordinator Name: Dr.Grace Saguti Signature: Date: ... ... Zonal Oncho Coordinator Name: Dr. Daniel wtJtekela sisnature: S[/ RgGloliil. i[3i}1. fiFF]r"j;l ;,, iirrelq 1_h... arz. Date: . ..1.kv.9 ;.. .?g*, I, NGDO Representative Name: Dr. lbrahim Kabore / sion,ture Date b Thrs report has been prepared by Name . Mr. Nurdin tvlalloya Design ation ect Coordi Sign ature Date e?u.9 u)6Y-e 2 WI-lO/APOC. 24 Nor,crnbcr 2(X)-l Table of contents ACRONYMS 5 l.l. GeNBRar INFoRMATIoN ......... 9 t.2. PopurertoN ............ l0 2.2. Aovocecy ............ 11 2.3. MosIttzRtloN, SENSITIZATIoN AND HEALTH EDUCATIoN oF AT RISK coMMUNrrrES ........12 2.4. CourrluN IrY TNVoLVEMENT 13 2.5 Cnpacny BUTLDTNG. 13 2.6. TRrnturNrs.. t6 2.6.5. Trend of treatment achievementfrom CDTI project inception to the current year........ l9 2.7. ORDERTNG, sroRAGE AND DELIVERy oF IvnnurctrN .................20 2.8. ColruurNrry sELF-MoNIToRTNG eNo STRxTHoLDERS MgBrrNc.... 2t 2.9 SupeRvrsroN ....22 2.9.1. Provide aJlow chart of supervision hierarchy. ....22 2.9.2. W'hat were the main issues identified during supervision?.............. 22 2.9.3. l[las a supervision checklist used?......... .......... 22 2.9.4. lV'hat were the outcomes at each level of CDTI implementation supervision?.........22 2.9.5. Was feedback given to the person or groups supervised? ..................... 22 2.9.6. How was the feedback used to improve the overall performance of the project? .... 22 SECTION 3: SUPPORT TO CDTI........ ...........23 3.1. EeurpusNr........ 23 3.2. FrxaNcnr coNTNBUTToNS oF THE pARTNERS AND coMMtrNITrES...... 24 3.4. ExpgNoITuRE PER ACTIVITY... 24 SECTION 4: SUSTAINABILITY OF CDTI 25 4.1. INrnnner; INDErENDENT pARTICTpAToRy MoNTToRING; EvnruRttoN ,.,.25 4.1.1 Was Monitoring/evaluation caruied out during the reporting period? (Tick any of the following which are applicable) ...........,,..,..... 2 5 4.1.2. V[rhat were the recommendations? . ..................... 2 5 4.1.3. How have they been implemented?................. ....,..............,. 26 4.2. SusrerNesrlrry oF rRoJECTS: rLAN AND sET TARGETS (MANDAToRv AT ..................... 26 Ysen 3) ........ ..................... 26 4.2.1 Planning at all relevant levels ..................... 26 4.2.2. Funds. ,....,............... 2 7 4.2.3 Transport (replacement and maintenance).... ....... 27 4.2.4. Other resources ...,.., 27 4.2.5. To what extent has the plan been implemented......... .........27 4.3. INr8cnanoN................ ......27 4.4. OpBnerroNAL RESEARCH.. .......27 4.4.I. Summarize in not more than one half of a page the operational research undertaken in the project area within the reporting period. .............. 27 4.4.2. How were the results applied in the project? N/A ..............27 SECTION 5: STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES... 28 SECTION 6: UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE PROJECT/OTHER MATTERS....................28 3 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 4 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 I Acronyms APOC African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control ATO Annual Treatment Objective ATrO Annual Training Objective CBO Community-Based Organization CDD Community-Directed Distributor CDTI Community-Directed Treatment with Ivermectin CSM Community Self-Monitoring LGA Local Government Area MOH Ministry of Health NGDO Non-Governmental Development Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organization NOTF National Onchocerciasis Task Force PHC Primary health care REMO Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis SAE Severe adverse event SHM Stakeholders meeting TCC Technical Consultative Committee (APOC scientific advisory group) TOT Trainer of trainers LTNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UTG Ultimate Treatment Goal wHo World Health Organization 5 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 Definitions (D Total population: the total population living in meso/hyper-endemic communities within the project area (based on REMO and census taking). (ii) Elisible population: calculated as 84o/o of the total population in meso/hyper- endemic communities in the project area. (iii) Annual Treatment Objective: (ATO): the estimated number of persons living in meso/hyper-endemic areas that a CDTI project intends to treat with lvermectin in a given year. (iv) Ultimate Treatment Goal (UTG): calculated as the maximum number of people to be treated annually in meso/hyper endemic areas within the project area, ultimately to be reached when the project has reached full geographic coverage (normally the project should be expected to reach the UTG at the end of the 3'd year of the project). (v) Therapeutic coveraqe: number of people treated in a given year over the total population (this should be expressed as a percentage). ("i) Geographical coverase: number of communities treated in a given year over the total number of meso[typer-endemic communities as identified by REMO in the project area (this should be expressed as a percentage). (vii) Integration: delivering additional health interventions (i.e. vitamin A supplements, albendazole for LF, screening for cataract, etc.) through CDTI (using the same systems, training, supervision and personnel) in order to maximise cost- effectiveness and empower communities to solve more of their health problems. This does not include activities or interventions carried out by community distributors outside of CDTI. (viii) Sustainability: CDTI activities in an area are sustainable when they continue to function effectively for the foreseeable future, with high treatment coverage, integrated into the available healthcare service, with strong community ownership, using resources mobilised by the community and the govemment. (ix) Community self-monitorine (CSM): The process by which the community is empowered to oversee and monitor the performance of CDTI (or any community- based health intervention prograrnme), with a view to ensuring that the prograrnme is being executed in the way intended. It encourages the community to take full responsibility of Ivermectin distribution and make appropriate modifications when necessary. 6 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 FOLLOW UP ON TCC RECOMMENDATIONS. Using the table below, fill in the recommendations of the last TCC on the project and describe how they have been addressed. TCC session 25th Number of TCC RECOMMENDATIONS ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE PROJECT FOR Recommen TCC/APOC dstion in MGT ASE the Report ONLY 323 TCC recommends for project improvement a More health stalf be More health staff has been trained and trained and involved in sensitized i.e. CHMT members, Co-opted CDTI members and various department heads of the Council hospital were sensitized and trained on CDTI philosophy in 2O'h November, 2007. a The Project should agree The comnrunities has agreed to distribute ' 'Mectizan' with communities to carry the drug ' in dry season , rn 200'/ out distribution outside the we distributed the d.ug from Hospital farming season, to reduce pharmacy to health facilities in September absenteeism and at Community level in October - November,2007. a Funds should be Funds have been internally mobilized to internally mobilized to cary out repairs of the equipment. carry out repairs on equipment, rather than using NGDOfunds a More mobilizqtion be Community members were mobilized prior carried out to remove to drug distribution hence the misconception on elfect of misconception on effect of Mectizan drug Mectizan@ has been minimized and in this report the therapeutic coverage is higher compared to the last distribution. People are willing to swallow the drug. Therapeutic coverage has raised from 7lo/o lhe previous year up to 77oh rn reporting year. a Prompt retirement of The project had managed to retire all allocated funds be canied allocated funds in time and in 2007 we oul to avoid late didn't experience any delay of funds from disburcement offunds by APOC Trust Fund. APOC a CSM and SHM should be Community self monitoring and SHM has introduced as soon as beerr conducted in December,200l in 531 possible communities. Up to now the project had received minutes of the meeting fronr 66 sub village. Still waiting from other sub village. a Operational research National Institute for Medical Research topics be identiJied and [NIMR] has been approached to assist in proposals written for same identifying topics and proposal writing as it is them who are dealing with vector control. 7 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report covers a period of 12 months starting from l't January, 2007 to 3lttDecember, 2007.Year 3 of the project saw many activities being implemented by the district council using funds from APOC, Council and Sight Saver's International all being directed at creating sustainability of the program by involving leaders at district level who are the policy makers and warrant holders. We held several sensitization meetings from the grass root of the community leadership up to District level i.e. Sub village leaders, village leaders, ward leaders, divisional leaders as well as Council [District] leaders. Independent Participatory Monitoring is one of the activities conducted in Tunduru CDTI in the year 2007.The activity was conducted with team from various institutions which was supported by APOC. The activity commenced on2 - l4 August 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cae Studies on Vk#Ce Hlllg -The
    25218 Volume 2 Taxzng' -Mig 'Hydropower Developmentu Cae( Studies on Tile Malgaracrsd Mmmwes'i and Kiueitwa 1l'veirs: Vk#Ce Hlllg-The Mikziwesg, River 44~~~~~~~~ Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~Aprill2002 [Paprs n th FSAL an~d [EZSEG Technicall Seires acre discussRon documents, not qonag p[rqct reports. They are sub;ject t o the same cop~ya'Oghts as otheir ESH&P pubOcatOons. JOINT UNDP / WORLD BANK ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME (ESMAP) PURPOSE The Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) is a special global technical assistance partnership sponsored by the UNDP, the World Bank and bi-lateral official donors. Established with the support of UNDP and bilateral official donors in 1983, ESMAP is managed by the World Bank. ESMAP's mission is to promote the role of energy in poverty reduction and economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner. Its work applies to low-income, emerging, and transition economies and contributes to the achievement of internationally agreed development goals. ESMAP interventions are knowledge products including free technical assistance, specific studies, advisory services, pilot projects, knowledge generation and dissemination, trainings, workshops and seminars, conferences and roundtables, and publications. ESMAP work is focused on three priority areas: access to modern energy for the poorest, the development of sustainable energy markets, and the promotion of environmentally sustainable energy practices. GOVERNANCE AND OPERATIONS ESMAP is governed by a Consultative Group (the ESMAP CG) composed of representatives of the UNDP and World Bank, other donors, and development experts from regions which benefit from ESMAP's assistance. The ESMAP CG is chaired by a World Bank Vice President, and advised by a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) of independent energy experts that reviews the Programme's strategic agenda, its work plan, and its achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Songea Municipal Profile 2010
    WI WJ NJ N WNJ WNM WNWWMNI WN NWNNNI MUNUCIPAL DIRECTOR SONGEA MU NICIPAL COUNCIL P.0, BOX 14 SONGEA. PHONE: + 225252602970 FAX: + 255252602474 Map No. 1: Songea Municip alitY S ONGTA TO'i{N TDMIMSTX.{TIIT AXIAS 2005 ill't tu 024 kilometers -r--l BONOEA WARDS I BOMBAhIBTLI I ltzraot'tr n lulAJENoo ! ri'nranlwr ! MATOGORo I MFARANYAKI ! lulsuFtNl N hILETELE I MSHANGANO ! Ruttnr,ttto ! RUVr..l[4A ! soNoEA_rulJtNl ! suBrRA sMe IilM Srtl@flE delolM Dtp{llsa @Ini*y of furir uri liw Srtiesrtr Delq@rd) Il{,{PNo.2 Source: Songeo Municipol Plonning Deporlment. STRUCTURE AND THE POLITICAL ORGANIZATION FULL COUNCIL Finance and Economic Affairs. Urban Planning, HIV/AID Administration Health and Education and Works Committee committee committee committee Ward Development Committee Mitaa Committee Adm inistrative O rga nization Stru ctu re VISION 'Aspires to have a community that enjoys sustainable high qaality standard of living' MISSION: 'Through collaboration with the internul und external stakeholders, intends to offer high quality and sustainable service to its community through the proper use of resources und through adherence to the priority set by involving its community in a transpurent und democratic manner which will eventually improve their standard of living by year 2020. Legalframework Songea is a Municipality within the Region of Ruvuma. The Songea Municipal appointed to be Municipality the year 2006. Lo c utio n and Top o grap hy Songea is one of the five Districts that make up Ruvuma Region. lt is the Regional Headquarter. lt lies between Longitude 35030'100 35'.The Municipality is bordered by the lringa Region to the Northern part, Songea District Council Southern part, Tunduru District Council Eastern part, and Mbinga District Council Western part, The Municipality is well linked by roads and other communication networks to the rest of the Region and other parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated History of the Selous Niassa Wildlife Corridor Based on Personal Communications with Rudi Hahn (Feb 10, 2008), Comments by Ludwig Siege and Rolf D
    Annotated History of the Selous Niassa Wildlife Corridor Based on personal communications with Rudi Hahn (Feb 10, 2008), comments by Ludwig Siege and Rolf D. Baldus (February 23, 2008) and archival material accessed at the Selous Niassa Wildlife Corridor office February 2008. 1987 Peak poaching period in Tanzania; elephant populations in the Selous Game Reserve are reported to have been reduced from more than 100,000 in the 1970s down to less than approximately 30,000 in the late 1980s. 1987-1988 At the request of the Tanzanian government (which was experiencing a widespread poaching problem), the Selous Conservation Program (SCP) is initiated as a joint program between the Wildlife Division of the Tanzanian Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) on behalf of the German Government. The SCP program pioneered the community based conservation approach within Tanzania. The goals of the SCP are to strengthen and rehabilitate the management of the Selous Game Reserve, secure sustainable funding for the reserve, and to significantly reduce conflicts between SGR and the local population by promoting sustainable wildlife utilization as a vehicle for rural development in local communities. Starting, the SCP work inside and outside (bufferzones) the reserve. Original staff includes Rolf Baldus (Programme Coordinator), Gerald Bigurube (SGR Project Manager), David Kaggi (Rural Development Officer and Hubert Krischke 1989 (Community Advisor). 1989 Operation Uhai 1989 The African elephant is placed on CITES Appendix 1. 1989 Tanzania Wildlife Monitoring Project undertakes an aerial wildlife census in the Selous ecosystem which included southern Tanzania and the Ruvuma river.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon A. H. Milledge Ised K. Gelvas Antje Ahrends Tanzania
    FORESTRY,GOVERNANCE AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A LOGGING BOOM IN SOUTHERN TANZANIA Simon A. H. Milledge Ised K. Gelvas Antje Ahrends DPG Tanzania Development United Republic of Tanzania Partners Group MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND TOURISM Published by TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa © 2007 TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa / Tanzania Development Partners Group / Ministry of Natural Resources of Tourism as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, IUCN – The World Conservation Union, the members of the Tanzania Development Partners Group or the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Milledge, S.A.H., Gelvas, I. K. and Ahrends, A. (2007). Forestry, Governance and National Development: Lessons Learned from a Logging Boom in Southern Tanzania. TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa / Tanzania Development Partners Group / Ministry of Natural Resources of Tourism, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 252pp. Key words: Hardwood, timber, exports, forestry, governance, livelihoods, Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Mtwara Region Investment Guide
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT MTWARA REGION INVESTMENT GUIDE The preparation of this guide was supported by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) 182 Mzinga way/Msasani Road Oyesterbay P.O. Box 9182, Dar es Salaam Tel: (+255-22) 2195000 - 4 978 - 9987 - 664 - 11 - 5 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.esrftz.or.tz Website: www.tz.undp.org MTWARA REGION INVESTMENT GUIDE | i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................................v ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................vi FOREWORD ..............................................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................xii DISCLAIMER ..........................................................................................................................................xiv PART ONE: ...............................................................................................1 REASONS FOR INVESTING IN MTWARA
    [Show full text]
  • Mtwara-Lindi Water Master Plan
    •EPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME I MAIN REPORT April 1986 FINNWATER HELSINKI, FINLAN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME I MAIN REPORT LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL Rr-F CuNTtfE FOR COMMUNITY WA i ER SUPPLY AND SAf STATION (IRC) P.O. Bo;: ::,!90, 2509 AD The Hagu» Tel. (070) 814911 ext 141/142 RN: ^0 •'•'•' L0: ?u^ TZrnJ3(, April 1986 FINNWATER CONSULTING ENGINEEHS HELSINKI , FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1986 - 2001 VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 3 SUMMARY 4 4 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION 7 5 WATER MASTER PLAN 1977 11 6 WATER SUPPLY SITUATION IN 1975 14 7 WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT 1976-1984 16 7.1 Construction of Water Supplies 16 7.2 Mtwara-Lindi Rural Water Supply 17 Project 8 PRESENT SITUATION 19 8.1 Investigations 19 8.2 Water Supply Situation in 1984 20 8.3 Comparison between 1975 and 1984 22 8.4 Water Supply Management 22 8.41 Organization 22 8.42 Staff 25 8.43 Facilities and Equipment 26 8.5 Financing 26 8.6 Problems 28 9 WATER RESOURCES REVIEW 29 9.1 Surface Water 29 9.2 Groundwater 31 10 WATER DEMAND 34 10.1 Population 34 10.2 Livestock 41 10.3 Institutions and Industries 43 10.4 Unit Water Demand 46 10.5 Water Demand 48 Page 11 PLANNING CRITERIA 50 11.1 General 50 11.2 Planning Horizon 50 11.3 Service Standards 50 11.4 Water Quality 51 11.5 Technology 52 11.6 Institutional Aspects 52 11.7 Financial Aspects 53 11.8 Priority Ranking 54 12 WATER SUPPLY METHODS 55 12.1 Piped Water Supplies -.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Community Perception and Adoption of Improved Sanitation in Tunduru District, Tanzania
    Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 12(2): 19-28, 2020 DOI:10.19026/rjees.12.6048 ISSN: 2041-0484; e-ISSN: 2041-0492 © 2020 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: February 27, 2020 Accepted: April 30, 2020 Published: August 25, 2020 Research Article Community Perception and Adoption of Improved Sanitation in Tunduru District, Tanzania 1John G. Safari, 2Fauza I. Issa and 1Zacharia S. Masanyiwa 1Institute of Rural Development Planning, P.O. Box 138, Dodoma, Tanzania 2Kilwa District Council, P.O. Box 160, Lindi, Tanzania Abstract: This study was conducted in Tunduru District, Tanzania to assess the perception and determinants for the adoption of improved sanitation. The specific objectives were twofold: (i) to examine community perception on improved sanitation and (ii) to determine the factors influencing the adoption of improved sanitation. A total of 248 householders were enrolled in the study. Data were collected through a household survey, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were subjected to t-test, Principal Component Analysis, and Chi- square test analysis. The findings showed that households with improved sanitation constituted 69.4% of the peri- urban sample compared with 18.9% for rural households. The corresponding figures for handwashing facilities were 3.1 and 5.8%. The perceived benefits of improved sanitation were clustered into four dimensions reflecting comfort, convenience, status symbol, and disease prevention. The main factors explaining the adoption of improved sanitation were younger age of household heads, secondary or higher education, employment or engaging in small business, higher household economic status, and living in peri-urban areas. Overall, these factors relate to the behavioral, normative, and control beliefs, which guide individual’s behavior and decisions to adopt and use improved toilet facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunduru - Who/Apoc/Cdti Project
    TUNDURU - WHO/APOC/CDTI PROJECT REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PARTICIPATORY MONITORING OF CDTI ACTIVITIES IN THE TUNDURU CDTI PROJECT, TUNDURU DISTRICT TANZANIA 2-14 AUGUST 2007 Community Members and CDTI Monitors in Ligoma Village, Tunduru District, Tanzania SUBMITTED TO THE DIRECTOR AFRICAN PROGRAMME ON ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL (APOC) AUGUST 2007 Independent Participatory Monitoring of Tunduru Focus CDTI Project ii Tanzania, 2-14 August 2007 TEAM COMPOSITION PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR William KISOKA Social Scientist National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania [email protected] +255 755 096080 (cell) INVESTIGATORS Dr. Deborah KABUDI - Project Coordinator, Morogoro Rural CDTI Project, Tanzania P.O. Box 110, Morogoro Email: [email protected] Tel: +255 784 351 200 (cell) Harriet HAMISI – Project officer, Helen Keller International, Tanga Region P.O. Box 5547, Tanga Email: [email protected]; Tel: +255 27 264621; +255 784 381521(cell) Oscar KAITABA - National Onchocerciasis Control Programme, Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, P.O. Box 9083, Dar es Salaam Email: [email protected]; + 255 22 213009; +255 754 889 390 (cell) Sebastian MHAGAMA - Mbinga District Onchocerciasis Coordinator, Tanzania P.O. Box 42, Mbinga, Tel: +784 8273 86 Dr. Wade A. KABUKA - Project Coordinator, Ruvuma Focus CDTI Project, Tanzania P.O. Box 5, Songea, Email: [email protected]; Tel: +255 25 2602048, +255 754 899941 (cell) FACILITATOR Joseph Chukwudi OKEIBUNOR Department of Sociology/Anthropology University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu District, Nigeria [email protected] +234 806 329 0671 (cell) Independent Participatory Monitoring of Tunduru Focus CDTI Project iii Tanzania, 2-14 August 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The team would like to extend its sincere gratitude to all those that assisted it during this mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Water Supply and Sanitation Lindi and Mtwara
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Letter of Transmittal Location Map of Study Area Village Location Map Acronyms and Abbreviations Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction..............................................................................1-1 1.1 General ............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Outline of the Study..........................................................................................1-2 1.2.1 Background of the Study .......................................................................1-2 1.2.2 Objectives of the Study .........................................................................1-3 1.2.3 Study Area ............................................................................................1-3 1.2.4 Scope of Work.......................................................................................1-3 1.2.5 Study Components and Sequence........................................................1-3 1.2.6 Reports .................................................................................................1-4 Chapter 2 Review of Master Plan and Establishment of Master Plan Framework.......................................................................2-1 2.1 Review of Master Plan......................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Water Master Plan 1977-1991...............................................................2-1 2.1.2 Mtwara-Lindi Rural Water Supply Project of 1977-1984 ........................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Terminal Evaluation Final Report
    THE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SELOUS – NIASSA WILDLIFE CORRIDOR Project Number: 00038545 PIMS Number 1135 TERMINAL EVALUATION FINAL REPORT Report Prepared by Oliver Chapeyama And Deo-Gratias Gamassa July 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 16 1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation 16 1.2 Valuation Methodology 18 1.3 Structure of the Report 19 2.0 Project Concept and Design 20 2.1 Background 20 2.2 Project and its Development Context 22 2.3 Project Design 24 2.4 Project Revision 25 2.5 Project Budget and Financial Planning 26 3.0 Findings and Conclusions 27 3.1 Findings 27 4.0 Results to Date 34 5.0 Project Impact and Sustainability 58 5.1 Project Impact 58 5.2 Project Effectiveness 59 5.3 Project Relevance 59 5.4 Project Efficiency 59 5.5 Project Sustainability 60 5.6 Contribution to skills Upgrading 63 6.0 Lessons learnt 63 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 63 7.1 Conclusions 63 7.2 Recommendations 66 8.0 Annexes 70 2 List of Tables Table 1: Project Budget Table 2: Project Achievements against Objectives Table 3: Project Progress against Outcomes Table 4: Overall Project Assessment Table 5: Assessment of Sustainability of Project Outcomes Annexes Annex 1: Terms of Reference Annex 2: List of People Interviewed Annex 3: Schedule of Visits Annex 4: References 3 Acronyms and Terms AA Authorised Association CBC Community-based Conservation CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CIC International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation CO UNDP Country Office FCS Financial Consulting Services GEF Global Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Ruvuma Private Forestry Investment Opportunities Site Profiles
    PRIVATE FORESTRY PROGRAMME RUVUMA PRIVATE FORESTRY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES SITE PROFILES United Republic of Tanzania MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND TOURISM Forestry and Beekeeping Ruvuma Private Forestry Investment Opportunities Site Profiles _________________________________________________________________________________ 19 October 2016 Ruvuma Private Forestry Investment Opportunities Site Profiles Report authors: Gerald Mango Team Leader, Land, Environment, Community Initiatives and Development Danielson Kisanga PGIS Project Coordinator, Land, Environment, Community Initiatives and Development Africanus Chale Regional Forest Officer, Ruvuma Michael Hawkes Team Leader, Private Forestry Programme Sangito Sumari National Private Forestry Advisor, Private Forestry Programme Faraja Mbuduka FIS/MIS Manager, Private Forestry Programme Andrew Ferdinands Land Use Planning, GIS & IT Expert, Private Forestry Programme Recommended citation: PFP (2016). Ruvuma private forestry investment opportunities – site profiles. Private Forestry Programme. Iringa, Tanzania. Private Forestry Programme – Panda Miti Kibiashara Plot no.21, Block 1, Zone 1A Gangilonga P.O. Box 2244, Iringa. www.privateforestry.or.tz Cover photo: A potential site for forest plantation establishment is being inspected by LECIDE/PFP team in Lihumbe Mountain, Mbinga District. DISCLAIMER: Private Forestry Programme made its best effort to provide accurate and complete information while executing the assignment behind this document, but assumes no liability or responsibility for any outcome of this document. No socioeconomic mapping or ecological risk assessment were conducted during the assignment. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF RUVUMA REGION 5 2.1 Location 5 2.2 Area and administrative units 5 2.1 Population distribution 5 2.2 Climate 6 2.2.1 Temperature 6 2.2.2 Rainfall 6 2.2.3 Humidity 6 2.3 Land cover 6 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Access to Essential Medicines in Tanzania
    Improving Access to Essential Medicines in Tanzania IMPROVING ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL MEDICINES IN TANZANIA Role of the ADDO Program Role of the ADDO Program 1 Improving Access to Essential Medicines in Tanzania 2 Role of the ADDO Program Improving Access to Essential Medicines in Tanzania The Context It is at the beginning of the third millennium. Tanzania emerges from decades of struggle against poverty, illiteracy and disease, with a powerful vision of quality livelihood, good governance and a strong competitive economy – the key pillars of the National Vision 2025. However, poverty remains high. About 36% of the population lives below basic needs poverty line. Over 70% of the population resides in rural areas, the majority of which depends on less than 1 US dollar a day. In a population of 34.5 million in 2002, 10 million cases of malaria are reported each year, many of which result in hospital admission and death. About 8% of the adult population is HIV positive and 107 in every 1,000 young children die before their first birthday. Access to healthcare services is constrained by long distances to health facilities especially in rural areas and widespread shortage of essential medicines in public health facilities. Fourteen percent (14%) of the population walks for more than 10km to a public facility; 6% for more than 10km to a private drug retailer. About 76% of all pharmacies in the country are located in three major urban areas (Dar es Salaam, Arusha and Mwanza). The rural populations mainly depend on Duka la Dawa Baridi (DLDB) to access medicines and the much needed pharmaceutical services.
    [Show full text]