The Determining Factors in the Establishment of the Museum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Determining Factors in the Establishment of the Museum CHAPTER 4 The Determining Factors in the Establishment of the Museum 1 The Socio-Cultural Environment in Vienna Austriain the late nineteenth century was a land of contrasts. Unlike other European countries in which state and nationality were virtually synony- mous, Austria was a multi-ethnic place in which the only unifying force was the Habsburg dynasty. German was the official language, but on the streets of Vienna, one would hear a mixture of Czech, Hungarian, Yiddish, and Romanian. The contrasts between the various sectors of society were palpable in every realm, be it social, ethical, economic, or behavioral. In those days, Vienna was witnessing a rapid burst of construction and de- velopment. The old city walls were torn down, and in their place a new boule- vard known as the “Ring” (or Ringstrasse) was paved. This boulevard developed into one of the most elegant thorough fares of its kind in all of Europe. It was lined with a number of distinguished institutions—including an opera, a university, a theater, and museums of both art and natural history—as well as with the homes of the some of the city’s wealthiest inhabitants. But these appearances were somewhat deceiving. Despite the modern look, late nine- teenth century Vienna was in fact a very conservative city. The “Ring” was cre- ated by the new bourgeoisie in an effort to present itself as the rightful heir to the past, and as the real force behind the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which, up until then, had been controlled by the aristocracy. The new buildings—espe- cially the public ones—were constructed in historicist or “retro” neo-Gothic or Neoclassical styles. They were architectural throwbacks to a glorious past, and through them the builders were trying to impart a sense of authority and power, firmly rooted in an indomitable tradition. The Neoclassical style was also the dominant force in sculpture in those days, and this, too, was a mani- festation of the conservative zeitgeist.1 With respect to design, the reactionary atmosphere of mid nineteenth century Austria was dominated by the Biedermeier style, which found favor with the bourgeoisie at a time when all forms of liberal expression were sup- pressed. In their attempts to stake a claim to traditional lifestyles, the Austrian 1 Rolf Toman, Vienna, Art and Architecture, Konemann, Cologne, 1999, 160. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���8 | doi ��.��63/9789004353886_006 The Determining Factors in the Establishment of the Museum 101 bourgeoisie and nouveau riches began to hoard collections of furniture, objets d’art, and works of art, all in a random mixture of styles. In the Biedermeier style they found something of a reconciliation, in the political sense, with an aesthetic of hedonism, lacking in sensuality, and uncritical. Another characteristic trait of the Biedermeier culture was an affinity to the past, expressed through the establishment of archives and museums in which various items were collected. Such institutions were meant to nurture and pre- serve the local tradition and provide the focus for a shared sense of identity and pride. With respect to the plastic arts, this affinity was expressed in an eagerness to perpetuate the existence of the family circle in its natural setting. This trend was discernible in landscape paintings, portraits, and depictions of daily life. The bourgeoisie rejected modernist abstract art and adhered to a Realism that could adequately portray their beautiful homes and families. In their desire to imitate the aristocracy, the members of this new social class also became patrons of the arts. Because the Jewish bourgeoisie endeavored to blend as best as possible into Viennese society, they avidly adopted most of these tendencies, and this included the aspiration to document the past. This was indeed one of the main reasons for the establishment of a Jewish museum in Vienna. 2 Enlightenment and Emancipation Jews began living in Austria as early as the tenth century CE. But more than any- thing else, the fate of the Jews was linked inextricably to the Habsburg dynasty, which ruled over Austria from 1273 to 1918 and also over Hungary, Bohemia, and Moravia from 1526 to 1918. Following the partition of Poland and the Habsburg annexation of Galicia in 1772 and Bukovina in 1775, Austria-Hungary could boast the largest Jewish population of any country west of Russia. Austria was swept up in a modernizing wave in the years 1781–89. This was a decade of far-reaching educational and industrial reforms. Nevertheless, full formal, legal emancipation was achieved only with the establishment of the Austro-Hungarian Dual Monarchy in 1867. Emperor Joseph II, who reigned as the sole ruler of the Holy Roman Empire from 1780 to 1790, decided to transform his realm into a centralized state with an industrial economic base. Included among the amendments he intro- duced were measures aimed at improving conditions for the Jews. The Edict of Tolerance issued in the years 1781–89 eliminated the requirement for Jews to bear identifying badges, and rendered the schools and universities acces- sible to them. Joseph II’s main goal was to abolish traditional social privileges, .
Recommended publications
  • From Oppression to Freedom
    FROM OPPRESSION TO FREEDOM John Jay and his Huguenot Heritage The Protestant Reformation changed European history, when it challenged the Roman Catholic Church in the 16th century. John Calvin was a French theologian who led his own branch of the movement. French Protestants were called Huguenots as a derisive Conflict Over the term by Catholics. Protestant Disagreements escalated into a series of religious wars Reformation in seventeenth-century France. Tens of thousands of Huguenots were killed. Finally, the Edict of Nantes was issued in 1598 to end the bloodshed; it established Catholicism as the official religion of France, but granted Protestants the right to worship in their own way. Eighty-seven years later, in 1685, King Louis XIV issued the Edict of Fontainebleau, which reversed the Edict of Nantes, and declared the public practice of Protestantism illegal. Louis regarded religious pluralism as an obstacle to his achieving complete power over the French people. By his order, Huguenot churches were demolished, Huguenot schools were The Revocation of closed, all newborns were required to be baptized as Roman Catholics, and it became illegal for the the Edict of Nantes Protestant laity to emigrate or remove their valuables from France. A View of La Rochelle In La Rochelle, a busy seaport on France’s Atlantic coast, the large population of Huguenot merchants, traders, and artisans there suffered the persecution that followed the edict. Among them was Pierre Jay, an affluent trader, and his family. Pierre’s church was torn down. In order to intimidate him into converting to Catholicism, the government quartered unruly soldiers called dragonnades in his house, to live with him and his family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Middle Class in Vienna in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
    The Jewish Middle Class in Vienna in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Erika Weinzierl Emeritus Professor of History University of Vienna Working Paper 01-1 October 2003 ©2003 by the Center for Austrian Studies (CAS). Permission to reproduce must generally be obtained from CAS. Copying is permitted in accordance with the fair use guidelines of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. CAS permits the following additional educational uses without permission or payment of fees: academic libraries may place copies of CAS Working Papers on reserve (in multiple photocopied or electronically retrievable form) for students enrolled in specific courses; teachers may reproduce or have reproduced multiple copies (in photocopied or electronic form) for students in their courses. Those wishing to reproduce CAS Working Papers for any other purpose (general distribution, advertising or promotion, creating new collective works, resale, etc.) must obtain permission from the Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota, 314 Social Sciences Building, 267 19th Avenue S., Minneapolis MN 55455. Tel: 612-624-9811; fax: 612-626-9004; e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction: The Rise of the Viennese Jewish Middle Class The rapid burgeoning and advancement of the Jewish middle class in Vienna commenced with the achievement of fully equal civil and legal rights in the Fundamental Laws of December 1867 and the inter-confessional Settlement (Ausgleich) of 1868. It was the victory of liberalism and the constitutional state, a victory which had immediate and phenomenal demographic and social consequences. In 1857, Vienna had a total population of 287,824, of which 6,217 (2.16 per cent) were Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Edict 13. Concerning the City of Alexandria and the Egyptian
    Edict 13. Concerning the city of Alexandria and the Egyptian provinces. (De urbe Alexandrinorum et Aegyptiacis provinciis.) _________________________ The same emperor (Justinian) to Johannes, glorious Praetorian Prefect of the Orient. Preface. As we deem even the smallest things worthy of our care, much less do we leave matters that are important and uphold our republic without attention, or permit them to be neglected or in disorder, especially since we are served by Your Excellency who has at heart our welfare, and the increase of the public revenue, and the wellbeing of our subjects. Considering, therefore, that, though in the past the collection of public moneys seemed to be in fair order, in other places it was in such confusion in the diocese of Egypt that it was not even known here what was done in the province, we wondered that the status of this matter had hitherto been left disarranged; but God has permitted this also to be left (to be put in order) in our times and under your ministry. Though they (the officials) sent us grain from there, they would not contribute anything else; the taxpayers all unanimously affirmed that everything was collected from them in full, but the prefects of the country districts (pagarchae), the curials, the collectors of taxes (practores), and especially the officiating (augustal) prefects so managed the matter that no one could know anything about it and so that it was profitable to themselves alone. Since, therefore, we could never correct or properly arrange things, if the management were left in disorder, we have decided to curtail the administration of the man at the head of Eyptian affairs, namely that of the Augustal Prefect.
    [Show full text]
  • 230Th Anniversary of the Edict of Toleration-November 1787
    230th anniversary of the Edict of Toleration-November 1787 On November 19, 1787, Louis XVI., attended by the princes and peers of the kingdom of France, came to the court of parliament to present the Edict on the Civic Rights of Protestants, which had been prepared by Baron de Breteuil and Lamoignon de Malesherbes for which General LaFayette had lobbied for on his return to France in 1785. Better known as the Edict of Toleration, it had 33 articles. The first article stated that Roman Catholicism would remain the religion of France, but certain concessions were allowed to the Calvinists or Huguenots but not to Lutherans or Jews. (1) Huguenots were permitted to live in France and to practice trades or industries, without being troubled for the sake of their religion. Certain professions were still excluded including all offices relating to the judiciary whether controlled by the crown or local nobles, and any municipal judicial position. Huguenots were excluded from serving on municipal councils. Protestants were not allowed to teach in public. (2) Huguenots were allowed to celebrate legal marriages with notification of a king’s judge or the Roman Catholic priest of the local parish. (3) The births of Huguenot children must be registered by the royal judges, and therefore were legitimate children when it came to property rights and inheritance. (4) Measures were taken for the burial of those who could not be buried according to the Roman Catholic rite. There were other regulations in the Act that regulated the dress of ministers and pastors in public. Huguenots were denied the ability to assemble and gather together to make collective demands of the King in person or in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine's Effect on Early Christianity
    Constantine’s Effect on Early Christianity Jo Ann Shcall Constantine! When you hear his name, do you think of the power and brutality of the Roman Empire, or do you think of the founding of formalized Christianity? Was Constantine good, bad, a mixture? There’s evidence for each position. Why Consider Constantine? The Orthodox Church regards Constantine as Saint Constantine the Great. He did much for the early Christian church from 306 to 337 while he was the Roman Emperor. Constantine was the first Roman Emperor to claim conversion to Christianity. His declaration of the Edict of Milan in 313 is one of his most important early contributions. This edict declared that Christians (and all other religions) would be tolerated throughout the empire, bringing an end to religious persecution. Constantine called together the first council of Nicaea in 325 with 250 mostly Eastern bishops1 resulting in the Nicene Creed, a statement of faith that attempted to unite disparate Christian communities.2 Constantine built the Church of the Holy Sepulcher at the purported site of Jesus’ tomb, which became the holiest site in Christendom. During his reign, he built many basilicas, repaired churches throughout the empire, relieved clergy of some taxes, supported the Christian church financially3 and saw that Sunday was designated as a day of rest for all citizens. He promoted Christians into political offices. Constantine decided his capitol should be moved to Byzantium. He did extensive building in this city, then renamed it Constantinople. This “new city” was said to be protected by relics of the True Cross, the Rod of Moses, and other holy relics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: History and Philosophy
    3 +LVWRU\DQG3KLORVRSK\ 3.1 This chapter surveys the development of freedom of religion from 200 BC until 1945. This material has not been drawn from the Committee’s inquiry. It is intended to provide a background to the development of the philosophy of religious freedom and the legal protections in place today. Introduction Toleration was attained by the legal guarantee of free belief and the public exercise of that belief. Legal toleration is limited in its scope, somewhat ignoble in some of its sources, but constitutes, none the less, one of the most significant advances that the human race has ever achieved.1 3.2 This Chapter surveys the history and development of the philosophy of freedom of religion. This is not a modern notion, for arguments against intolerance and for religious liberty can be traced back to ancient times. The first known charter of religious toleration was carved in rock over two hundred years before the birth of Christ. Neither have ideas on religious freedom developed in a linear manner: indeed, some countries are further from religious freedom today than they were centuries ago. It is, therefore, necessary to consider the social context in which protagonists of toleration worked in order to understand the significance of their achievements. 3.3 Whilst numerous examples of religious intolerance could be found in each of the periods mentioned below, this chapter concentrates on examples of tolerance and influential individuals and events which contributed in a positive manner to the development of religious freedoms. 1 W K Jordan, The Development of Religious Toleration in England, Vol I, (London, George Allen & Unwin, 1932), p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thirty Years' War: Examining the Origins and Effects of Corpus Christianum's Defining Conflict Justin Mcmurdie George Fox University, [email protected]
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Seminary Masters Theses Seminary 5-1-2014 The Thirty Years' War: Examining the Origins and Effects of Corpus Christianum's Defining Conflict Justin McMurdie George Fox University, [email protected] This research is a product of the Master of Arts in Theological Studies (MATS) program at George Fox University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation McMurdie, Justin, "The Thirty Years' War: Examining the Origins and Effects of Corpus Christianum's Defining Conflict" (2014). Seminary Masters Theses. Paper 16. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/seminary_masters/16 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Seminary at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seminary Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. A MASTER’S THESIS SUBMITTED TO GEORGE FOX EVANGELICAL SEMINARY FOR CHTH – 571-572: THESIS RESEARCH AND WRITING DR. DAN BRUNNER (PRIMARY ADVISOR) SPRING 2014 BY JUSTIN MCMURDIE THE THIRTY YEARS’ WAR: EXAMINING THE ORIGINS AND EFFECTS OF CORPUS CHRISTIANUM’S DEFINING CONFLICT APRIL 4, 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Justin M. McMurdie All rights reserved CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PART 1: THE RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL BACKGROUND OF THE THIRTY YEARS’ WAR 6 Corpus Christianum: The Religious, Social, and Political Framework of the West from Constantine to the Reformation 6 The Protestant Reformation, Catholic Counter-Reformation, and Intractable Problems for the “Holy Roman Empire of the
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practice
    STUDY OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE MATTER OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS AND PRACTICES by Arcot Krishnaswami Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities UNITED NATIONS STUDY OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE MATTER OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS AND PRACTICES by Arcot Krishnaswami Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities UNITED NATIONS New York, 1960 Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. E/CN.4/Sub.2/200/Rev. 1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Catalogue No.: 60. XIV. 2 Price: $U.S. 1.00; 7/- stg.; Sw. fr. 4.- (or equivalent in other currencies) NOTE The Study of Discrimination in the Matter of Religious Rights and Practices is the second of a series of studies undertaken by the Sub- Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities with the authorization of the Commission on Human Rights and the Economic and Social Council. A Study of Discrimination in Education, the first of the series, was published in 1957 (Catalogue No. : 57.XIV.3). The Sub-Commission is now preparing studies on discrimination in the matter of political rights, and on discrimination in respect of the right of everyone to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. The views expressed in this study are those of the author. m / \V FOREWORD World-wide interest in ensuring the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion stems from the realization that this right is of primary importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine, the Edict of Milan (313
    Constantine, The Edict of Milan (313 CE)1 without molestation…When you see that this has been granted to them Constantine was the son of the Roman Emperor Constantius; he by us, your Worship will know that we have also conceded to other claimed the throne in 306 CE but had to fight several rivals until 324, at religions the right of open and free observance of their worship for the which point he became the supreme Roman Emperor (though he still had co-emperors). According to his biographer Eusebius, Constantine had a sake of the peace of our times, that each one may have the free dream the night before a major battle in which he saw a Christian opportunity to worship as he pleases; this regulation is made we that we symbol and the inscription “conquer by this.” He took it as his battle standard and was victorious. Constantine embraced Christianity in the may not seem to detract from any dignity or any religion. early 300s, and issued this official edict (with his co-emperor Licinius) in Moreover, in the case of the Christians especially we esteemed it 313 CE. When I, Constantine Augustus, as well as I, Licinius Augustus, best to order that if it happems anyone heretofore has bought from our fortunately met near Mediolanurn (Milan), and were considering treasury from anyone whatsoever, those places where they were everything that pertained to the public welfare and security, we thought, previously accustomed to assemble, concerning which a certain decree among other things which we saw would be for the good of many, those had been made
    [Show full text]
  • On the Sacred Edict in Canto 98 & 99
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo Cambridge Journal of China Studies 63 “The King’s Job, Vast as Swan-Flight”: More on The Sacred Edict in Canto 98 & 99 Rong OU Hangzhou Normal University 142, Foreign Languages School, HNU, 58, Haishu Road, Hangzhou P R China, 310007 Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Ezra Pound maintained his commitment to Confucianism and Chinese culture throughout his life and made abundant use of Chinese materials in The Cantos. He drew a lot of inspiration from The Sacred Edict 圣谕广训 of Qing Dynasty of China and rewrote it in Canto 98 & 99. The paper unfolds the complicated expansion and transmission of The Sacred Edict from the literary Chinese version to the colloquial Chinese version, from the East to the West, and clarifies a few errors in some Pound studies. Pound borrowed The Sacred Edict into Canto 98 & 99 to create a gleaming “throne” on a Confucian design, an earthly paradise built on “Sagetrieb”, with Pound as one more transmitter of “Sagetrieb” whose job is, “vast as swan-flight”. Key words: Thrones, The Sacred Edict, Wang Youpu, Baller Volume 9, No. 2 64 Ezra Pound maintained his commitment to Confucianism and Chinese culture throughout his life and made abundant use of Chinese materials in The Cantos. Yet, only a few Chinese figures enjoy the privilege of being written into his cantos recurrently. Most of them are either Confucian sages like Confucius (as Kung) 孔子, Mencius 孟子 and Zengzi (as Tseng) 曾子, or legendary sage-emperors like Yao 尧, Shun (as Chun) 舜, Yu 禹, or strong rulers like Kangxi 康熙 (as K’ang-hsi or Kang Hi), Yongzheng 雍正 (as IongChing, Iong Cheng or Yong Tching), Qianlong 乾隆 (as Ch’ien-lung or Kien Long).1 However, one Qing official appears implicitly and explicitly five times in Canto 98.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abdication, 1912
    Chapter 30 The Abdication, 1912 Eleven days after the outbreak of the Wuchang uprising on October 10, 1911, the National Assembly convened for its second session. The appointed members of the pro-Republican Assembly forced Zaifeng, Prince-Regent and father of the infant Xuantong Emperor, to permit the immediate promulgation of the so-called Nineteen Articles of Constitution, which removed the emperor’s ability to act by edict.1 In recognition of this momentous event, the assembly- men obliged Zaifeng to announce as much at the Imperial Ancestral Temple of the Great Qing. By early November, military pressure on Beijing and ongoing political pro- tests at the lack of a “responsible Cabinet” compelled Zaifeng to recall Yuan Shikai from his forced retirement and appoint him prime minister. Over the next few months, Yuan skillfully maneuvered to increase his power. On November 22, he persuaded the Court to allow him complete authority to make decisions on all government matters, except those relating to the impe- rial household. All memorials would henceforth be addressed to the Cabinet rather than the emperor. On December 6, Yuan orchestrated Zaifeng’s resigna- tion and the conduct of court affairs fell to the more pliant Empress Dowager Longyu. Throughout December, Yuan held the imperial armies back while using the revolutionary threat to intimidate Empress Dowager Longyu. She eventu- ally agreed to an armistice and the opening of a North-South Conference in Shanghai where the Imperialists and Republicans could negotiate the nature of the future polity. Both sets of negotiators favored a republican form of gov- ernment, and fourteen provinces had already declared their independence, but they decided to ask the Court to convene a parliament to decide wheth- er the new government would be a constitutional republic or constitutional monarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Catholic Church and Religious Freedom Carlos V. Reyes
    The Catholic Church and Religious Freedom Carlos V. Reyes Introduction The Catholic Church is a living organism that is both spiritual and physical. And while it has a transcendent nature, the Church exists in the world and Christians interact with their fellow citizens and society in general. Our Lord Jesus Christ mandated her to be the salt of the earth, the light of the world, and a city set on a hill. The Church takes on human flesh through adherence to the Faith of generations of men and women. It follows therefore that the Church’s theology, liturgies and methodologies do not exist in a vacuum as they are influenced by the categories of the societies and civilizations where the Church exists. Like Jesus, the Church is an incarnate being. And rather than saying that the Church is ‘inculturated’ we may probably say that a culture or civilization is ‘christified’ or ‘ecclesialized’ if such terminologies even exist. The Church is influenced by the environment where she lives in but the Church likewise christifies that environment. This applies to the Church and religious freedom. Religious Freedom during the time of Jesus Christ During the time of Christ, the Roman Empire was cosmopolitan. Rome allowed various peoples to retain their own cult as long as they recognize Rome’s hegemony. The State recognizes the contribution of religion to the well being of the State. The priests and the Emperor, who is pontifex maximus, have the duty to invoke the benevolence of the gods. A refusal of cult was considered as treason. Separation of Religion and State was unthinkable.
    [Show full text]