DOCSLIB.ORG

(BGBM) Für Das Jahr 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(BGBM) Für Das Jahr 2002 Willdenowia 33 – 2003 5 WERNER GREUTER & ROBERT VOGT Bericht über den Botanischen Garten und das Botanische Museum Berlin-Dahlem (BGBM) für das Jahr 2002 1. Hauptereignisse Das Jahr 2002 lässt sich aus der Sicht des BGBM schwer charakterisieren. Am ehesten vielleicht mit dem Ausdruck: Stabilität auf hohem Niveau. Wobei allerdings “Stabilität” unter den gegen- wärtigen politischen und ökonomischen Bedingungen des Landes Berlin nicht etwa wohlfundier- tes, gesichertes Wirken, sondern eher den Balanceakt des Artisten auf dem hohen Seil bedeutet; so dass das “hohe Niveau” eben auch nicht die natürliche Konsequenz des zweckmäßigen Einsat- zes ausreichend verfügbarer Mittel ist, sondern unter ständiger Anspannung und Inkaufnahme von Überlast erkämpft werden muss. Dies gilt es also zunächst anerkennend hervorzuheben: Dass die nüchtern aufgezählten Ele- mente dieses Berichtes einen wissenschaftlichen und organisatorischen Erfolg ausweisen, der nichts weniger ist als selbstverständlich; und dass der BGBM seine wiederum bemerkenswerten Erfolge dem begeisterten Einsatz und der hohen Leistungsdichte der gesamten ‘Mannschaft’ ver- dankt, vom Handwerker und der Gärtnerin bis zu den Chefetagen von Wissenschaft und Verwal- tung. Man darf nicht vergessen, dass laufende Maßnahmen zur Umstrukturierung mit dem mittel- fristigen Ziel höherer Effizienz weiterhin namhafte Kapazitäten binden: Genannt seien beispiel- haft die Einführung der Kosten-Leistungs-Rechnung (bei welcher dem BGBM innerhalb der Freien Universität eine Pionierrolle zukommt) sowie die Integration der biologischen Instituts- bibliotheken in die “Bibliothek am BGBM” (siehe 3.3.). Wissenschaftliche Erfolge seien an erster Stelle genannt. Wie üblich kommen sie in zahlrei- chen Veröffentlichungen (siehe 8.3.), Vorträgen und Posterdarstellungen (siehe 8.4.) zum Aus- druck. Hier sind auch die Gastwissenschafter zu erwähnen, welche zum Teil für etliche Monate hier forschen. Besonders erfreulich war 2002 der Besuch von nicht weniger als 6 Kollegen/innen aus Kuba, welche im Rahmen des Gemeinschaftsprojektes “Flora de la República de Cuba” hier betreut werden konnten – zwei von ihnen als Stipendiaten der Alexander-von-Humboldt- Stiftung. Auch dieses Jahr erschien ein Band der Flora, welche das Grundlagenwerk für die ku- banische Pflanzenwelt bildet. Mehrere neue Drittmittel-Forschungsprojekte wurden bewilligt (siehe 7.1.), von welchen das bedeutsamste den Aufbau des Deutschen Botanik-Knotens für die Global Biodiversity Informati- on Facility (GBIF) betrifft. Weitere Anträge wurden vorbereitet und eingereicht. Der For- schungsschwerpunkt Compositen-Systematik erhält zusätzlichen Auftrieb durch die Übernahme der Familienbearbeitung im Rahmen des von arger Zeitnot gepeinigten, von Reading (U.K.) aus organisierten Euro+Med-Projektes. Dafür muss in kurzer Frist ein kritisches Inventar der gesam- ten Familie für den Raum Europas und der Mittelmeerländer erstellt werden. 6 Greuter & Vogt: Jahresbericht für 2002 In der Öffentlichkeit ist der BGBM inzwischen ständig präsent, sowohl durch die engen Me- dienkontakte als auch durch eigene Angebote vielfältigster Art. Als wichtiges Novum hat sich die beliebte Verkaufsausstellung “Home and Garden” bei uns etabliert. Zusammen mit weiteren, inzwischen zum eisernen Bestand des Berliner Kulturlebens gehörigen Veranstaltungen entsteht so eine willkommene zusätzliche Einnahmequelle für unsere Institution. Sehr aktiv in Bezug auf Realisationen und Planungen war das Schaumuseum, das dadurch seine Besucherzahl innerhalb von Jahresfrist verdoppeln konnte. Dazu haben sowohl die großen Sonderausstellungen in den Museumsräumen als auch die kleineren, rascher wechselnden auf der oberen Galerie beigetragen (siehe 4.1.1.). Die Modernisierung wichtiger Museumsbereiche aus Mitteln des Potztal-Nachlasses erfordert sorgfältige Vorbereitung, macht aber erkennbar Fortschritte. Am 16. März fand in den Räumen des BGBM ein Treffen der Kustoden des Verbandes Bota- nischer Gärten e.V. statt – der wichtigste diesjährige Anlass dieser Art. Im Mai wurde am BGBM ein Memorandum of Understanding als Rahmen für gemeinsame Forschungsprojekte und Wissenstransfer zwischen dem Central Botanical Garden Pyongyang, DVR Korea, vertreten durch seinen Vize-Direktor Ri Wan-Ik und dem BGBM unterzeichnet. Die folgenden neuen oder erneuerten Mandate wurden Mitarbeitern im Berichtszeitraum über- tragen und folgende Ehrungen wurden ihnen zuteil: W. G. Berendsohn: GBIF (“Global Biodiversity Information Facility”) Deutscher Delegierter, NODES Committee; Mitglied im Science Subcommittee for Data Access and Interoperabi- lity. W. Greuter: International Organization for Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, President (2002-2008); Editorial Committee, Euro+Med Project; Wilhelm-Pfeffer-Stiftung der Deut- schen Botanischen Gesellschaft e.V., Vorstand; World Innovation Foundation, Fellow. R. Jahn: International Society for Diatom Research, Member of Council (2002-2006). H. W. Lack: Magdalen College, Oxford, Visiting Fellow (Michaelmas term 2003). Th. Raus: Gemeinsamer Museumsbeirat der Staatlichen Museen für Naturkunde Karlsruhe und Stuttgart, Mitglied (2002-2005). 2. Wissenschaftliches Personal 2.1. Mitarbeiter auf Planstellen Direktion: Prof. Dr. Werner Greuter, Leitender Direktor Abt. Garten: Leitung: Dr. Albert-Dieter Stevens, Kustos Dr. Christa Beurton, wiss. Angestellte Dr. Beat Leuenberger, wiss. Angestellter Dr. Thomas Raus, Oberkustos Abt. Bibliothek, Archiv und Ausstellungen: Leitung: Prof. Dr. Hans Walter Lack, Direktor Dr. Norbert Kilian, wiss. Angestellter Dr. Birgit Mory, wiss. Angestellte Abt. Biodiversitätsinformatik und Labors: Leitung: Prof. Dr. Walter G. Berendsohn, Direktor Dr. Regine Jahn, Oberkustodin Dr. Heidemarie Nowak-Krawietz, Kustodin, halbtags Dr. Harrie Sipman, wiss. Angestellter Willdenowia 33 – 2003 7 Abt. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und Herbarien: Leitung: Prof. Dr. Brigitte Zimmer, Direktorin Dr. Ewald Gerhardt, wiss. Angestellter, halbtags Dr. Burghard Hein, Oberkustos Dr. Christoph Oberprieler, wiss. Angestellter Dr. Robert Vogt, Kustos 2.2. Doktoranden und Diplomanden (siehe 6.2. und 6.3.) 2.3. Mitarbeiter aus Drittmitteln und Praktikanten Joana Balitzki (Freiwilliges Ökologisches Jahr), bis 31.8. Erika Döhnert (Umweltpädagogin, SAM-Programm, GFA) Markus Döring [wiss. Angestellter, BioCASE (Biological Collection Access Service for Eu- rope) Projekt, EU (Europäische Union)], ab 15.1. Marc Geoffroy [wiss. Angestellter, FE Vorhaben MoreTax, BfN (Bundesamt für Natur- schutz)] Karl Glück (wiss. Angestellter, BIOLOG AlgaTerra-Projekt, BMBF), ab 1.6. Eleonor Gregory-Guider (Praktikantin), bis 30.6. Anton Güntsch [wiss. Angestellter, ENHSIN (European Natural History Specimen Informa- tion Network) und Euro+Med-Projekte, EU] Andrea Hahn [wiss. Angestellte, BIOLOG BoGart- und Bohlmann-Projekte, BMBF (Bun- desministerium für Bildung und Forschung)] Viola Huck (studentische Hilfskraft, BIOLOG Alga Terra-Projekt, BMBF) Simone Kipka [studentische Hilfskraft, BIOTA (Biodiversity Transect Analysis) Je- men-Projekt, BMBF] Agnes Kirchhoff (wiss. Angestellte, BIOLOG BoGart-Projekt, BMBF), bis 31.8. Christine Koch (Grafikerin, SAM-Programm), bis 31.12. Wolf-Henning Kusber (wiss. Angestellter, BIOLOG AlgaTerra-Projekt, BMBF) Jinling Li (wiss. Angestellte, BioCASE Projekt, EU), ab 1.2. Daniela Martinova (Praktikantin), ab 15.10. Dr. Ursula Matthäs (wiss. Angestellte, BIOLOG BoGart-Projekt, BMBF), bis 31.5. Jörg Meister (wiss. Angestellter, BIOTA Jemen-Projekt, BMBF) Blanca Miranda de Behrens (Forum für Arbeit und Projekte), ab 1.9. Katharina Rabe (studentische Hilfskraft, BIOTA Jemen-Projekt, BMBF) Harun Raffael (wiss. Angestellter, SAM-Programm), bis 31.12. Boris Smalla (wiss. Angestellter, BIOLOG Bohlmann-Projekt, BMBF), bis 30.6. Anna Surma (wiss. Angestellte, BIOLOG BoGart-Projekt, BMBF), bis 31.8., ab 15.10. Kerstin Teske (wiss. Angestellte, BIOLOG AlgaTerra-Projekt, BMBF), bis 28.2. Marcel Weingärtner (wiss. Angestellter, eloqu mebabasis, bis 31.8.) Irina Will (wiss. Angestellte, Med-Checklist, Mattfeld-Quadbeck-Stiftung), ab. 1.6. 2.4. Ehrenamtliche Mitarbeiter Dr. Silvia Arroyo-Leuenberger Dr. Dieter Benkert Dr. Friedhelm Butzin Ana Diederich-de Pablo Prof. Dr. Hartmut Ern Peter Erzberger Dr. Madjit I. Hakki Dr. Ralf Hand Marina Heilmeyer 8 Greuter & Vogt: Jahresbericht für 2002 Prof. Dr. Paul Hiepko Gerda Kernd’l Hartmut Krebs Dr. Werner F. Kreisch Eva Lanka Dr. Gerald Parolly Michael Ristow Silke Schaube Gabriele Schiefert Prof. Dr. Hildemar Scholz Dr. Gerrit Stohr Inge Weinert Dr. Norbert Wendt Dr. Eckhard Willing Dr. Bernhard Zepernick 2.5. Gastforscher R. Berazaín Iturralde, La Habana, Kuba, 29.11.-31.12., Herbarstudien (Ochnaceae) [Universi- tätspartnerschaft von Universidad de La Habana und HU Berlin] M. G. Caluff, Santiago de Cuba, Kuba, 8.7.-9.9., Herbarstudien (Cyatheaceae, Selaginellaceae) [Stipendium des Vereins der Freunde des BGBM] A. Everest, Mersin, Türkei, 15.9.-16.10., Herbarstudien (Flora der Türkei) [DAAD-Stipendium] Y. G. Jo, Pyongyang, DVR Korea, 2.5.-3.6., Literatur- und Gartenstudien [DAAD-Stipendium] I. B. Kim, Pyongyang, DVR Korea, 2.5.-3.6., Literatur- und Gartenstudien [DAAD-Stipendium] I. E. Méndez Santos, Camaguey, Kuba, 4.7.-23.9, Herbarstudien (Lamiaceae, Verbenaceae) [Wiederaufnahmestipendium der Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung] N. Nöske, Göttingen, 1.5.-31.12., Herbarstudien (Flechten) [DFG-gefördertes Forschungspro- jekt] M. G. Pimenov, Moskau, Russland, 16.9.-15.11., Herbarstudien (Apiaceae) [Stipendium] R. Rankin Rodríguez, Havanna, Kuba, 5.10.-31.12.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Host Range and Impact of Dichrorampha Aeratana, the First Potential Biological Control Agent for Leucanthemum Vulgare in North America and Australia
    insects Article Host Range and Impact of Dichrorampha aeratana, the First Potential Biological Control Agent for Leucanthemum vulgare in North America and Australia Sonja Stutz 1,* , Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate 2 , Hariet L. Hinz 1, Alec McClay 3 , Andrew J. McConnachie 4 and Urs Schaffner 1 1 CABI, Rue des Grillons 1, CH-2800 Delémont, Switzerland; [email protected] (H.L.H.); [email protected] (U.S.) 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, 5403—1 Ave. S., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada; rosemarie.declerck-fl[email protected] 3 12 Roseglen Private, Ottawa, ON K1H 1B6, Canada; [email protected] 4 Weed Research Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Biosecurity and Food Safety, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Oxeye daisy, a Eurasian member of the daisy family, has become invasive in several parts of the world, including North America and Australia. We investigated whether a root-feeding moth found closely associated with oxeye daisy in Europe could be used as a biological control agent for the plant when weedy. We found that the moth could develop on 11 out of 74 plant species that we tested in laboratory conditions when it was given no choice of plants. When the Citation: Stutz, S.; De Clerck-Floate, moths were given a choice of food plants outdoors, we found its larvae only on the ornamentals R.; Hinz, H.L.; McClay, A.; Shasta daisy and creeping daisy. Larval feeding had no impact on the weight and number of flowers McConnachie, A.J.; Schaffner, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow White and Rose Red: Studies on the Contrasting Evolutionary Trajectories of the Genera Leucanthemum Mill
    Snow White and Rose Red: Studies on the contrasting evolutionary trajectories of the genera Leucanthemum Mill. and Rhodanthemum B.H.Wilcox & al. (Compositae, Anthemideae) DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DES DOKTORGRADES DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (DR. RER. NAT.) DER FAKULTÄT FÜR BIOLOGIE UND VORKLINISCHE MEDIZIN DER UNIVERSITÄT REGENSBURG vorgelegt von Florian Wagner aus Burgstall (Mitwitz) Juli 2019 Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 12.07.2019 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Christoph Oberprieler Unterschrift: ……………………………....... Florian Wagner iv Abstract Plant systematics, the study of taxonomy, phylogeny and evolutionary processes in plants has undergone considerable progress in the last decades. The application of modern molecular approaches and DNA-sequencing techniques in the field has led to an improved inventory of biodiversity and a better understanding of evolutionary processes shaping the biological diversity on our planet. The increased availability of molecular and genomic data has particularly facilitated the investigation of shallowly diverged and taxonomically complex taxon-groups, which is challenging due to minor morphological differences, low genetic differentiation and/or hybridization among taxa. The present thesis investigates species delimitation, hybridization and polyploidization in the recently diverged genera Leucanthemum Mill. and Rhodanthemum B.H. Wilcox & al. of the subtribe Leucantheminae K.Bremer & Humphries (Compositae, Anthemideae) by applying Sanger-, 454-pyro-, and restriction site associated
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of POLYPLOIDY on GENETIC STRUCTURE and REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION in the GENUS LEUCANTHEMUM Mill. (COMPOSITAE, ANTHEMIDEAE)
    THE IMPACT OF POLYPLOIDY ON GENETIC STRUCTURE AND REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN THE GENUS LEUCANTHEMUM Mill. (COMPOSITAE, ANTHEMIDEAE) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Fakultät für Biologie und vorklinische Medizin der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Roland Greiner aus Regensburg im Dezember 2011 Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: Prof. Dr. Christoph Oberprieler Unterschrift: Evolution is a change from an indefinite, incoherent, homogeneity to a definite, coherent, heterogeneity, through continuous differentiations and integrations. Herbert Spencer Evolution is a change from a no-howish, untalkaboutable, all-alikeness by continous sticktogetheration and somethingelsification. William James Table of Contents Table of Contents..........................................................................................................I List of Tables...............................................................................................................III Table of Figures...........................................................................................................V Abstract.......................................................................................................................1 General Introduction...................................................................................................2 Types of Polyploidy..................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E
    Chapter38 Anthemideae Christoph Oberprieler, Sven Himmelreich, Mari Källersjö, Joan Vallès, Linda E. Watson and Robert Vogt HISTORICAL OVERVIEW The circumscription of Anthemideae remained relatively unchanged since the early artifi cial classifi cation systems According to the most recent generic conspectus of Com- of Lessing (1832), Hoff mann (1890–1894), and Bentham pos itae tribe Anthemideae (Oberprieler et al. 2007a), the (1873), and also in more recent ones (e.g., Reitbrecht 1974; tribe consists of 111 genera and ca. 1800 species. The Heywood and Humphries 1977; Bremer and Humphries main concentrations of members of Anthemideae are in 1993), with Cotula and Ursinia being included in the tribe Central Asia, the Mediterranean region, and southern despite extensive debate (Bentham 1873; Robinson and Africa. Members of the tribe are well known as aromatic Brettell 1973; Heywood and Humphries 1977; Jeff rey plants, and some are utilized for their pharmaceutical 1978; Gadek et al. 1989; Bruhl and Quinn 1990, 1991; and/or pesticidal value (Fig. 38.1). Bremer and Humphries 1993; Kim and Jansen 1995). The tribe Anthemideae was fi rst described by Cassini Subtribal classifi cation, however, has created considerable (1819: 192) as his eleventh tribe of Compositae. In a diffi culties throughout the taxonomic history of the tribe. later publication (Cassini 1823) he divided the tribe into Owing to the artifi ciality of a subtribal classifi cation based two major groups: “Anthémidées-Chrysanthémées” and on the presence vs. absence of paleae, numerous attempts “An thé midées-Prototypes”, based on the absence vs. have been made to develop a more satisfactory taxonomy presence of paleae (receptacular scales).
    [Show full text]
  • Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem
    Willdenowia Annals of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem JOACHIM W. KADEREIT1*, DIRK C. ALBACH2, FRIEDRICH EHRENDORFER3, MERCÈ GALBANY-CASALS4, NÚRIA GARCIA-JACAS5, BERIT GEHRKE1, GUDRUN KADEREIT6,1, NORBERT KILIAN7, JOHANNES T. KLEIN1, MARCUS A. KOCH8, MATTHIAS KROPF9, CHRISTOPH OBERPRIELER10, MICHAEL D. PIRIE1,11, CHRISTIANE M. RITZ12, MARTIN RÖSER13, KRZYSZTOF SPALIK14, ALFONSO SUSANNA5, MAXIMILIAN WEIGEND15, ERIK WELK16, KARSTEN WESCHE12,17, LI-BING ZHANG18 & MARKUS S. DILLENBERGER1 Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? Version of record irst published online on 24 March 2016 ahead of inclusion in April 2016 issue. Abstract: The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating well- founded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classiications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in ge- neric assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identiied c. 140 where data quality is suiciently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet suicient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still iercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be trans- lated into a classiication, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German lora and the loras of neighbouring countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species First Recognised As Naturalised Or Naturalising for New South Wales in 2004 and 2005
    Plant species first recognised as naturalised or naturalising for New South Wales in 2004 and 2005 John R. Hosking1, Barry J. Conn2, Brendan J. Lepschi3 and Clive H. Barker4 1Industry & Investment New South Wales, 4 Marsden Park Road, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia; [email protected] 2National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia; [email protected] 3Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; [email protected] 428 Wallis Street, Lawson, NSW 2783, Australia: [email protected] Abstract: Information is provided on the taxonomy and distribution of 62 taxa of naturalised or naturalising plants newly recorded for the state of New South Wales during the period 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2005 and 1 species treated in the 2002 revised Flora of New South Wales Volume 2 but overlooked in an earlier paper of this series. Of these taxa, 17 are new records for Australia (prefaced with a †). The 62 taxa are: Acer palmatum, †Acer saccharinum, Achillea filipendulina, Acokanthera oblongifolia, †Anemone hupehensis var. japonica, Berberis aquifolium, †Bidens aurea, †Brugmansia suaveolens, Brugmansia x candida, Buddleja dysophylla, †Convolvulus farinosus, Cordyline australis, Coriandrum sativum, Corymbia citriodora (Australian species naturalised outside its native range), Crassula ericoides subsp. ericoides, Crotalaria retusa (Australian species naturalised outside its native range), Cyperus prolifer, Echinochloa
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/092376 Al 16 June 2016 (16.06.2016) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/092376 Al 16 June 2016 (16.06.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, A61K 36/18 (2006.01) A61K 31/465 (2006.01) KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, A23L 33/105 (2016.01) A61K 36/81 (2006.01) MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, A61K 31/05 (2006.01) BO 11/02 (2006.01) PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, A61K 31/352 (2006.01) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (21) International Application Number: PCT/IB20 15/002491 (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (22) International Filing Date: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, 14 December 2015 (14. 12.2015) TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (25) Filing Language: English TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (26) Publication Language: English LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, (30) Priority Data: SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, 62/09 1,452 12 December 201 4 ( 12.12.20 14) US GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Subtribal Classification of the Tribe Anthemideae (Compositae)
    Willdenowia 37 – 2007 89 CHRISTOPH OBERPRIELER, SVEN HIMMELREICH & ROBERT VOGT A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae) Abstract Oberprieler, C., Himmelreich, S. & Vogt, R.: A new subtribal classification of the tribe Anthemideae (Compositae). – Willdenowia 37: 89-114. – ISSN 0511-9618; © 2007 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem. doi:10.3372/wi.37.37104 (available via http://dx.doi.org/) A new subtribal classification of the Compositae-Anthemideae is presented based on phylogenetic re- constructions for sequence information of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ri- bosomal DNA (nrDNA) for 103 of the 111 accepted genera of the tribe. Results of the present analyses are compared with results from phylogenetic analyses based on cpDNA ndhF sequence variation and discussed in conjunction with morphological, anatomical, cytological, embryological and phytoche- mical evidence. As a result, 14 subtribes are circumscribed and described in detail, with information provided concerning the generic members and the geographical distribution of these entities. Four subtribes (i.e. Osmitopsidinae, Phymasperminae, Pentziinae and Leucanthemopsidinae) are described as new to science, for a further subtribe a new name (Glebionidinae, replacing the illegitimate Chry- santheminae) is validated. Key words: Asteraceae, nrDNA ITS, phylogeny, taxonomy. Introduction According to the most recent generic conspectus of Compositae tribe Anthemideae (Oberprieler & al. 2006), that tribe consists of 111 genera and c. 1800 species. Main
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Changes
    Plant Names Database: Quarterly changes 31 August 2015 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2015 This copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand license. Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Landcare Research" http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7931/P1301R CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Plant names database: quarterly changes [electronic resource]. – [Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand] : Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua, 2014- . Online resource Quarterly November 2014- ISSN 2382-2341 I.Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. II. Allan Herbarium. Citation and Authorship Wilton, A.D.; Schönberger, I.; Gibb, E.S.; Boardman, K.F.; Breitwieser, I.; Cochrane, M.; Dawson, M.I.; de Pauw, B.; Fife, A.J.; Ford, K.A.; Glenny, D.S.; Heenan, P.B.; Korver, M.A.; Novis, P.M.; Redmond, D.N.; Smissen, R.D. Tawiri, K. (2015) Plant Names Database: Quarterly changes. August 2015. Lincoln, Manaaki Whenua Press. This report is generated using an automated system and is therefore authored by the staff at the Allan Herbarium who currently contribute directly to the development and maintenance of the Plant Names Database. Authors are listed alphabetically after the third author. Authors have contributed as follows: Leadership: Wilton, Heenan, Breitwieser Database editors: Wilton, Schönberger, Gibb Taxonomic and nomenclature research and review: Schönberger, Gibb, Wilton, Breitwieser, Dawson, Ford, Fife, Glenny, Heenan, Novis, Redmond, Smissen Information System development: Wilton, De Pauw, Cochrane Technical support: Boardman, Korver, Redmond, Tawiri Disclaimer The Plant Names Database is being updated every working day. We welcome suggestions for improvements, concerns, or any data errors you may find.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauranthemum, a New Name for Leucoglossum B. H. Wilcox & Al
    TAXON 44 - AUGUST 1995 377 Mauranthemum, a new name for Leucoglossum B. H. Wilcox & al. non S. Imai (Compositae, Anthemideae) Robert Vogt & Christoph Oberprieler1 Summary Vogt, R. & Oberprieler,C.: Mauranthemum,a new name for LeucoglossumB. H. Wilcox & al. non S. Imai (Compositae,Anthemideae). - Taxon 44: 377-378. 1995. - ISSN 0040-0262. Mauranthemumis publishedas an avowed substitutefor LeucoglossumB. H. Wilcox & al. 1993, which is an illegitimatelater homonymof LeucoglossumS. Imai 1942. New combinationsfor four species and one subspeciesare proposed. The genus Leucoglossum B. H. Wilcox & al. was recenty established in Bremer & Humphries (1993: 142) to include the annual species formerly placed in Leucanthe- mum sect. Eunuchoglossum DC. (Vogt, 1991). Unfortunately it is an illegitimate later homonym of Leucoglossum S. Imai (1942: 524), a name that is currently in use for a genus of the ascomycete family Geoglossaceae (Greuter & al., 1993; Eriksson & Hawksworth, 1993). We are currently revising the genus. The following new generic name and new combinations are presented here to prevent spreading use of the illegitimate name. Mauranthemum Vogt & Oberprieler,nom. nov. = Leucoglossum B. H. Wilcox & al. in Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus., Ser. Bot. 23: 142. 1993 (non S. Imai in Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 56: 524. 1942. - Type: Mauranthemumpaludosum (Poir.) Vogt & Ober- prieler (Chrysanthemumpaludosum Poir.). Mauranthemum paludosum (Poir.) Vogt & Oberprieler,comb. nov. _ Chrysanthe- mum paludosum Poir., Voy. Barbarie 2: 241. 1789 - Leucoglossum paludosum (Poir.) B. H. Wilcox & al. in Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus., Ser. Bot. 23: 142. 1993. Mauranthemum paludosum subsp. ebusitanum (Vogt) Vogt & Oberprieler,comb. nov. - Leucanthemumpaludosum (Poir.) Pomel subsp. ebusitanum Vogt in Ruizia 10:223. 1991. Mauranthemum decipiens (Pomel) Vogt & Oberprieler, comb.
    [Show full text]