Dilemmas in the Jewish Communal Field for Orthodox and Traditional Professionals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DILEMMAS IN THE JEWISH COMMUNAL FIELD FOR ORTHODOX AND TRADITIONAL PROFESSIONALS JEFFREY KORBMAN Development Officer, Jewish Theological Seminary; Formerly Development Executive, UJA- Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York There are a growing number of Orthodox and traditional Jewish communal profession als in the federation field. At times, their personal religious beliefs come into conflict with their professional obligations. This article explores several such dilemmas, citing Jewish sources in support of possible professional responses. n an article entitled "Ethical Dilemmas in ditional field comes a fiindamental religious I;he Jewish Community Center," David dilemma: traditional values at odds with a Dubin (1987) explores challenges faced by frequently nontraditional communal the ethically sensitive Jewish Community agenda. Center. These dilemmas include the par Working with the Young Leadership Di ticipation of intermarried lay leadership, vision of UJA-Federation in New York improperly documented donations, keeping evoked numerous dilemmas that pitted my a "kosher" kitchen, as well as several other religious beliefs and principles against my policy questions. In each case, Dubin sug professional obligations. This article ex gests how a communal center ought to re plores four such dilemmas. The responses spond. offered below are strictly the opinion of this Often, though, dilemmas of Jewish insti author and are not to be taken as those of all tutional policy are grappled with privately Orthodox or traditional Jews. Those facing before being brought forth as an agenda personal challenges of this sort should con item for discussion. For some Jewish com sult their local rabbi for fiirther discussion. munal professionals, ethical dilemmas aris ing in the workplace often challenge their THE FUND-RAISING EVENT AND THE personal beliefs, Jewish values, and Jewish STUMBLING BLOCK practice. This is certainly true for Orthodox Background and traditional Jews working in the field. Commonly referred to as the "Spring Gala," Today, within the federation field, there is a this fiind-raising event generates sizeable growing constituency of Orthodox and tra fiinds for the operating budget of the divi ditional Jewish volunteers and profession sion, thereby enabling us to sponsor over 50 als. Where there once was concern about programs throughout the year for young obtaining a kosher meal at the Council of Jewish adults. These activities include Jew Jewish Federations' annual General Assem ish educational programs ranging from ba bly, today kosher food is assumed at its sic Hebrew reading to text study discussions main fiinctions. At major meetings, tradi on Jewish laws and customs. Yet, the tional Shabbat services now boast a sizeable Spring Gala is, in essence, a party and a Orthodox and traditional participation, and dance. Its main activity is mixed dancing major plenaries are suspended on this day. between non-married men and women. It is also not unusual to see a yarmulke be ing worn around the convention by numer Dilemma ous leaders and speakers. With the growing Orthodox and traditional constituency in a According to traditional Jewish law, men historically and still predominantly nontra- and women are not permitted physical con- 64 Dilemmas for Orthodox and Traditional Professionals / 65 tact outside the context of marriage or fam ticipate in any activity of this transaction, ily {Shulchan Aruch, Evan HaEzer 22:1). such as acting as witnesses or writing the Further, mixed dancing, which often in loan document, because of Lijhey Iver. volves physical contact, is explicitly forbid Thus, Lifney Iver encompasses supportive den {Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 529:4 and ancillary participation as well. and Mishnah Berurah gloss 21). This pro Does mnning a fimd-raising dance then hibition places the staff involved in coordi violate the prohibition of Lifney Iver? Fur nating this dance in the position of violat ther, even if one is not in charge of it, but ing the biblical prohibition of "enabling one simply helps out at the event — collects to commit a sin," or Lijhey Iver Lo Titen money at the door, checks coats, serves the Michshol ("before a blind person you shall food etc. — is this person violating this not put a stumbling block") found in Levi law? ticus 19; 14. Simply put, would I, the staff The answer might lie in an important professional, violate the prohibition of distinction that is made in discussing Lifiiey "Lifney Iver" (enabling the "blind" to sin) Iver; namely, the issue of accessibility. The by organizing a fund-raising dance? Talmud {Avodah Zarah 6B) quotes Rabbi Natan's statement and limits its application Explanation of the Issue to a case of trei ibrah d 'nahara (literally, The issue of acting as enabler for others to "two sides of the river"). If the potential break traditional Jewish law is a complex sinner (in the above case, the Nazir) is on one side of the river, and the prohibition one. Based on the biblical verse quoted (the wine) is on the other side of the river, above, Rashi, the great talmudic commenta and the person extends his hand over "the tor, wrote that "blind" is not to be taken lit river" to enable the prohibition to take erally, but rather means that the individual place, this violates Lijhey Iver. Conversely, is simply unaware of his transgression. if the Nazir had wine next to him, on "the This definition of "blind" is expanded by same side of the river" — meaning that it the Talmud {Pesachim 22A) as follows; was easily accessible at all times — then even if one extends the wine to him, one R. Natan said, "From where do we know that does not violate Lifney Iver since he could one may not extend a cup of wine to a Nazir have attained the wine on his own. [one who has vowed to abstain from wine] nor a limb from a hve animal to a Noachide Moreover, a later commentator. Rabbi [which is prohibited]? The source is from the Akiva Eiger, states {Yoreh Deah 181:6) verse, "Thou shall not place a stumbhng that, if enabling another to sin (who is go block before a blind person." ing to sin anyway) will reduce the total gravity of sins committed, it is permitted. The Talmud, as cited above, does not differ For example, if one says to another person, entiate between an intentional and uninten- "1 am going to eat pork (a biblical and more Uonal sinner. Therefore, one can infer that severe prohibition) unless you serve me even if the sinner is aware of his actions, it chicken and milk (less rabbinic prohibi is prohibited to assist him. Further, the tion)," it would be permissible to serve the Talmud teaches elsewhere {Bava Metzia person chicken and milk since it reduces the 75B) that even when an individual indi total gravity of the sin. rectly assists the "blind" person, doing so Response would also violate the prohibition of Lifney Iver, enabling. For instance, the Talmud One might argue that staffing a fund-rais states that not only is it forbidden for one ing dance would not be in violation of Jew to charge another Jew interest on a Lifney Iver since (a) trei ibrah d 'nahara money loan but it is also prohibited to par ("two sides of the river") is not in effect FALL 1994 Journal of Jewish Communal Service 66 since tliere are dances all over New York Dilemma City, and those in attendance could simply It States in Levificus 19:17: "Do not hate find another dance if they did not come to your brother in your heart. You must ad our Spring Gala and (b) the Spring Gala monish your neighbor and not bear sin be lends the opportunity for Jews to inter cause of him," This verse obligates all Jews mingle, thereby reducing the possibility of to be concerned with the behavior of and to interacting with the predominantly non- admonish when necessary their co-religion Jewish crowds found at dance clubs open to ists. This Jewish principle rejects the secu the public. The Spring Gala, one could say, is only attracting people who would be go lar notion of "live and let live," ing out dancing anyway and moreover di On this Singles Mission, what obligation minishes the possibilities of interaction with do I have to admonish or point out the vio non-Jews predominant in public clubs or lation of the "three weeks" to a fellow Jew dance halls. However, there are many who violates traditional Jewish law? halachic poskim (Jewish legal decisors) who Explanation of the Issue disagree with this interpretation of Lifhey Iver and would forbid any participation in Maimonides, in commenting on the com an activity that included mixed dancing. mandment of admonishing, writes the fol (Ex, R. Moshe Feinstein, O.H. 4:35), lowing (Hilchot Deot 6:6-9): SUMMER SINGLES MISSION: TO TALK If one has observed his friend sinning or fol OR NOT TO TALK lowing an improper path, it is a mitzvah to restore him to the correct way and to inform Background him that he is sinning against himself, as it is Every summer. National UJA organizes a written, "You must admonish your neigh national singles mission to Israel. In recent bor".,,,One must continue to reprove him un years, the mission has attracted several hun til the sinner actually strikes [the reprover] dred young, single adults from throughout and says, "I refuse to comply," Whoever is the country. Typically, as it takes place able to protest [the behavior of the sinner] during the summer, individuals go on the and does not, will ultimately suffer the conse trip as their summer vacation and look to quences of that sin, since he could have pos have a good time as much as learning and sibly prevented it from occurring.