FAT and HEART DISEASE - Yes, We CAN Make a Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAT and HEART DISEASE - Yes, We CAN Make a Change Pekka Puska Director General National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) Helsinki, Finland President, World Heart Federation (WHF) FAT AND HEART DISEASE - Yes, we CAN make a change. The case of North Karelia, Finland International Expert Meeting in Health significance of fat quality of the diet Barcelona 1-2.2.2009 World Heart Federation 7 rue des Battoirs, P.O. Box 155 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland www.worldheart.org 22 Global Health Burden Estimated global deaths by cause, all ages, 2005 20000000 Cardiovascular 18000000 diseases 16000000 14000000 12000000 10000000 8000000 Cancer 6000000 Chronic respiratory diseases 4000000 HIV/AIDS Tuberculosis 2000000 Diabetes Malaria 0 Source : WHO 2005: «Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment» 3 GlobalGlobal PublicPublic HealthHealth inin TransitionTransition ChronicChronic diseasesdiseases –– especiallyespecially cardiocardio--vascularvascular diseasesdiseases ¾¾LeadingLeading healthhealth problemproblem inin industrializedindustrialized countriescountries ¾¾MainMain killerskillers andand rapidlyrapidly growinggrowing problemproblem inin developingdeveloping countriescountries 4 LifestyleLifestyle TransitionTransition ¾¾ EmergingEmerging globalglobal epidemicepidemic ofof NCDsNCDs isis toto aa greatgreat extentextent aa consequenceconsequence ofof changeschanges inin thethe diets,diets, ofof decliningdeclining physicalphysical activityactivity andand ofof increaseincrease ofof tobaccotobacco useuse ¾¾ TheThe determinantsdeterminants ofof thesethese changeschanges areare urbanisation,urbanisation, changeschanges inin occupations,occupations, populationpopulation ageingageing andand manymany globalglobal influencesinfluences ¾¾ RisksRisks areare increasinglyincreasingly accumulatingaccumulating inin lowerlower sociosocio--economiceconomic groupsgroups ofof thethe populationpopulation 5 WORLDWORLD DeathsDeaths inin 20002000 AttributableAttributable toto SelectedSelected LeadingLeading RiskRisk FactorsFactors Blood pressure Tobacco Cholesterol Underweight Unsafe sex Fruit and vegetable intake High Body Mass Index Physical inactivity Alcohol Unsafe water, sanitation, and hygiene Indoor smoke from solid fuels Iron deficiency Urban air pollution Zinc deficiency Vitamin A deficiency Unsafe health care injections Occupational risk factors for injury Number of deaths (000s) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Source: WHR 2002 6 SixSix ofof thethe SevenSeven TopTop DeterminantsDeterminants ofof MortalityMortality inin DevelopedDeveloped CountriesCountries RelateRelate toto HowHow WeWe Eat,Eat, DrinkDrink andand MoveMove DietDiet andand physicalphysical activity,activity, togethertogether withwith tobaccotobacco andand alcohol,alcohol, areare keykey determinantsdeterminants ofof contemporarycontemporary publicpublic healthhealth 7 8 8 69 10 10 NorthNorth KareliaKarelia ProjectProject PrinciplesPrinciples forfor DefiningDefining thethe IntermediateIntermediate ObjectivesObjectives •• DueDue toto thethe chronicchronic naturenature ofof CVD,CVD, thethe potentialpotential forfor thethe controlcontrol ofof thethe problemproblem lieslies inin primaryprimary preventionprevention •• TheThe riskrisk factorsfactors werewere chosenchosen onon thethe basisbasis ofof bestbest availableavailable knowledgeknowledge:: -- previousprevious studiesstudies -- collectivecollective internationalinternational recommendationsrecommendations -- epidemiologicalepidemiological situationsituation inin NorthNorth KareliaKarelia •• ChosenChosen riskrisk factorsfactors:: -- smokingsmoking -- elevatedelevated serumserum cholesterolcholesterol (diet)(diet) -- elevatedelevated bloodblood pressurepressure 11 FromFrom KareliaKarelia toto NationalNational ActionAction •• FirstFirst provinceprovince ofof NorthNorth KareliaKarelia asas aa pilotpilot (5(5 years),years), thenthen nationalnational actionaction (1972(1972––77)77) •• ContinuationContinuation isis NorthNorth KareliaKarelia asas nationalnational demonstrationdemonstration (1977(1977––95)95) •• GoodGood scientificscientific evaluationevaluation toto learnlearn ofof thethe experienceexperience •• ComprehensiveComprehensive nationalnational actionaction 12 NorthNorth KareliaKarelia ProjectProject PracticalPractical interventionintervention -- EmphasisEmphasis onon persuasion,persuasion, practicalpractical skills,skills, socialsocial && environmentalenvironmental supportsupport forfor changechange -- ResearchResearch teamteam && locallocal projectproject officeoffice withwith comprehensivecomprehensive communitycommunity involvementinvolvement -- MainMain areas:areas: 1.1. MediaMedia activitiesactivities (materials,(materials, massmass media,media, campaigns)campaigns) 2.2. PreventivePreventive servicesservices (primary(primary healthhealth carecare etc.)etc.) 3.3. TrainingTraining ofof professionalprofessional andand otherother workersworkers 4.4. EnvironmentalEnvironmental changeschanges (smoke(smoke freefree areas,areas, supermarkets,supermarkets, foodfood industryindustry etc.)etc.) 5.5. MonitoringMonitoring andand feedbackfeedback 13 EvaluationEvaluation // MonitoringMonitoring -- NorthNorth KareliaKarelia –– allall FinlandFinland -- MonitoringMonitoring systemssystems •• healthhealth behaviourbehaviour •• riskrisk factorsfactors •• nutritionnutrition •• diseases,diseases, mortalitymortality 14 UseUse ofof ButterButter onon BreadBread (men(men ageage 3030––59)59) % 100 North Karelia Kuopio province 80 Southwest Finland Helsinki area 60 Oulu province Lapland province 40 20 0 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 15 Butter consumption per capita in Finland 20 ) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 Consumption (kg per capita 2 0 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 16 Milk Consumption in Finland in 1970 and 2006 (kg per capita) kg 140 120 Whole milk 100 Low fat milk 80 Whole form milk 60 40 20 Skim milk 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 17 Change in fat content of Finnish cow milk 45 45 Fen: y = -0.16x + 362 44 44 43 g/kg Fen 43 Gen 42 Gen: y = -0.16x + 358 42 41 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year ©Valio Oy 18 Use of Vegetable Oil for Cooking (men age 30– 59) % 70 North Karelia 60 Kuopio province Southwest Finland 50 Helsinki area Oulu province 40 Lapland province 30 20 10 0 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 19 BiscuitBiscuit ExampleExample • Leading Finnish biscuit manufacturer (LU Finland Ltd) has removed some 80.000 kg of SAFA by changing the fats used • All trans fats removed • Major change to rapeceed oil 20 FruitsFruits andand VegetablesVegetables –– SupermarketsSupermarkets 21 Fat Intake as Percentage of Energy in Finland 40 Recommendations 30 Total fat (~ 30 EN%) SFA (~10 EN%) 20 MUFA (10-15%) En% PUFA (5-10%) 10 Sources: Hasunen et al. 1976 Uusitalo et al. 1986 0 Kleemola et al. 1994 1969- 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 Findiet Study Group 1998 Männistö et al. 2003 72 Year 22 SaltSalt IntakeIntake inin FinlandFinland 19771977––20022002 g/day 16 Per capita statistics 12 Dietary surveys, men Dietary surveys, 8 women Sodium excretion, men 4 Sodium excretion, women 0 1 1981 1 1992 1997 2 9 9 0 77 8 0 7 2 Year Sources: Karvonen et al. 1977, Nissinen et al. 1982, Pietinen et al. 1981, Pietinen et al. 1990, Valsta 1992, KTL/Nutrition Report 1995, KTL/ FINDIET 1997 and FINDIET 2002 Studies, KTL/unpublished information 23 The Finnish Heart Symbol www.sydanmerkki.fi 24 SerumSerum CholesterolCholesterol inin MenMen AgedAged 3030––5959 YearsYears mmol/l 7,5 7 North Karelia Kuopio 6,5 Turku/Loimaa Helsinki/Vantaa 6 Oulu Lapland 5,5 5 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 FINRISK Studies 1997 & 2002 25 EstimatesEstimates ofof SS--CholChol changeschanges inin 19821982––2002*2002* Men 0,1 PUFA 0 Dietary cholesterol -0,1 SFA -0,2 Keys mmol/l -0,3 SFA+trans -0,4 Keys (trans) ** -0,5 Measured S-Chol -0,6 1982 1992 2002 * Based on calculated intakes of dietary fatty acids and cholesterol. Standardized to the 2001 Finnish population. Users of cholesterol lowering medication excluded in -92 and -02. ** Trans fatty acids included as SFA (Source: KTL/Valsta, Tapanainen, Laatikainen, Männistö, Vartiainen, in preparation ) 26 EstimatesEstimates ofof SS--CholChol changeschanges inin 19821982–– 2002*2002* Women 0,1 PUFA 0 Dietary cholesterol -0,1 SFA -0,2 Keys mmol/l -0,3 SFA+trans -0,4 Keys (trans) ** -0,5 Measured S-Chol -0,6 198219922002 *Based on calculated intakes of dietary fatty acids and cholesterol. Standardized to the 2001 Finnish population. Users of cholesterol lowering medication excluded in -92 and -02. ** Trans fatty acids included as SFA (Source: KTL/Valsta, Tapanainen, Laatikainen, Männistö, Vartiainen, in preparation ) 27 AgeAge--adjustedadjusted mortalitymortality ratesrates ofof coronarycoronary heartheart diseasedisease inin NorthNorth KareliaKarelia andand thethe wholewhole ofof 700 FinlandFinland amongamong start of the North Karelia Project 600 malesmales agedaged extension of the Project nationally 3535––6464 yearsyears 500 fromfrom 19691969 toto 2006.2006. 400 North Karelia 300 - 85% MortalityMortality perper 200 100100 000000 All Finland populationpopulation 100 - 80% Age-standadized to European population 0 Year 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 2002 2005 28 ObservedObserved andand PredictedPredicted DeclinesDeclines inin CoronaryCoronary MortalityMortality inin EasternEastern Finland,Finland, MenMen % 0 -10 -20 Observed Predicted -30 Cholesterol -40 Blood pressure Smoking -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Year 29 MMororttaalitlityy ChChangesanges iinn FiFinnllanandd ffromrom 19691969–– 7171 toto 20062006 (Men(Men 3535––6464 Years,Years,
Recommended publications
  • Regions of Eastern Finland (Summary)
    Summary of views on the 2nd Cohesion Report Regions of Eastern Finland, 27.8.2001 Regions of South Karelia, South Savo, Kainuu, North Karelia and North Savo Starting point: - The EU regional policy is important for the development of Eastern Finland regions. - During the period 1995-1999 Eastern Finland was covered by the Obj 6, 5b and Interreg II A programmes. Of these the Obj 6 programme area was defined in the Accession Treaty of Finland and Sweden on account of specific circumstances of sparse population. - In the present period until 2006 the South Savo, North Karelia, North Savo and Kainuu regions form an Obj 1 programme area. At the same time East Finland has an A support status according to Article 87.3 of the Treaty, allowing allocation of higher state aid. The region of South Karelia is covered by the Obj 2 programme. In addition there are two Interreg III A programmes implemented in the area. - The Eastern Finland regions consider that the additionality principle has not been followed in the implementation of the regional development programmes. - The Eastern Finland (NUTS II area) GDP has lowered by 2.3 % between 1995-1999 in comparison to the EU average, and by over 5 % in comparison to the national average. It is very likely that the GDP/capita of Eastern Finland will not exceed 75 % of EU15 average without (national) specific measures. Views on the future Cohesion Policy: - The enlargement and increase of territorial inequality means that sufficient structural policy resources are required to guarantee a stable regional development. It seems that the proposed 0.45 % of the GDP will not be enough in the enlarged Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Outokumpu Mining Case Study
    OUTOKUMPU MINING CASE STUDY Preliminary reflections 7 March 2019 1. Regional strengths of Outokumpu 2. Challenges for sustained growth 3. Policy options 4. Data appendix 2 1. Geographic location – proximity to Joensuu - 50 kilometres distance to Joensuu (average travel time of 40 minutes) and 40km to Joensuu airport (travel time 35 minutes) - 90 kilometres distance to Kuopio (average travel time of 75 minutes) - Less than 120 kilometres distance to the Russian border Population trend (1990 = 100) 120 Joensuu Outokumpu 115 110 Outokumpu is part of the largest labour 105 Regional population growth is concentrating market in North 100 in Joensuu Karelia (Joensuu). 95 90 85 80 75 2. A strong industrial sector and a high share of tradable activities Share of employed population by economic sector (2016) Finland Local labour Outokumpu market Agriculture, forestry and fishing (A) (T) 3% 8% 4% Public administration and defence, compulsory social security, 29% 32% 30% education and human health (O,P,Q) (NT) Construction (F) (NT) 7% 7% 6% Real estate (L) (NT) 1% 1% 1% Other services (R,S,T,U) (T) 5% 5% 5% Mining and quarrying, electricity and 1% 2% 4% water supply (B,D,E) (T) Manufacturing (C) (T) 13% 16% 24% Whole sale and retail trade, transportation, accommodation and food 21% 17% 14% services (G, H, I) (NT) Information and communication (J) (T) 4% 1% 1% Professional, scientific, technical and 13% 8% 10% administrative activities (M, N) (NT) Financial and insurance activities (K) (T) 2% 1% 1% • Outokumpu’s industry plays an instrumental role in the smart specialization strategy of North Karelia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU and NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND
    Policy Highlights OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study: OUTOKUMPU AND NORTH KARELIA, FINLAND About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. About CFE The Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities helps local, regional and national governments unleash the potential of entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized enterprises, promote inclusive and sustainable regions and cities, boost local job creation and implement sound tourism policies. About this booklet This document summarizes the key findings of OECD (2019), OECD Mining case study: Outokumpu and North Karelia, OECD Publishing, Paris. The full publication will be available at http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/mining-regions-project.htm This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: ©Getyyimages, @Outokumpu Mining Museum For more information: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/ │ 1 Introduction This policy highlight provides a summary of the first OECD Mining Regions and Cities Case Study. The Case Study focuses on the region of North Karelia and the municipality of Outokumpu in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Second World War As a Trigger for Transcultural Changes Among Sámi People in Finland
    Acta Borealia A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies ISSN: 0800-3831 (Print) 1503-111X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sabo20 Second world war as a trigger for transcultural changes among Sámi people in Finland Veli-Pekka Lehtola To cite this article: Veli-Pekka Lehtola (2015) Second world war as a trigger for transcultural changes among Sámi people in Finland, Acta Borealia, 32:2, 125-147, DOI: 10.1080/08003831.2015.1089673 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089673 Published online: 07 Oct 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 22 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=sabo20 Download by: [Oulu University Library] Date: 23 November 2015, At: 04:24 ACTA BOREALIA, 2015 VOL. 32, NO. 2, 125–147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1089673 Second world war as a trigger for transcultural changes among Sámi people in Finland Veli-Pekka Lehtola Giellagas Institute, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The article analyses the consequences of the Lapland War (1944– Received 28 October 2014 45) and the reconstruction period (1945–52) for the Sámi society Revised 25 February 2015 in Finnish Lapland, and provides some comparisons to the Accepted 24 July 2015 situation in Norway. Reconstructing the devastated Lapland KEYWORDS meant powerful and rapid changes that ranged from novelties Sámi history; Finnish Lapland; of material culture to increasing Finnish ideals, from a Lapland War; reconstruction transition in the way of life to an assimilation process.
    [Show full text]
  • North Karelia As a Mining Region Eira Varis Development Director North Karelia in a Nutshell
    North Karelia as a mining region Eira Varis Development director North Karelia in a nutshell Population 162 087 (2019) 13 municipalities, of which 5 towns Regional centre Joensuu Distance to Helsinki 450 km, one hour flight Distance to St Petersburg 407 km by train 89 % of land area covered by forests East and west meet 300 km frontier with Russia Over 1.2 million border crossings per year in Niirala Inland waterway connection through Saimaa canal to Russia and the Baltic Sea World-class knowledge hub Unique collaboration and expertise European Forest Institute – EFI HQ Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE) Finnish Forest Centre Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Business development: Business Joensuu, regional Business Development Organisations Educational institutions Educational institutions University of Eastern Finland – UEF Karelia University of Applied Sciences Riveria Vocational Education & Training Over 20 000 students in the region High-quality R&D and business • 6 000 companies, 33 000 employers, 5,7 billion € turnover • Top business areas: metal products, machinery, forest industry and technology, bioeconomy, plastics, mining, trade and services Mineral deposits of North Karelia 13.6.2019 Strenghts and weaknesses of North Karelia +++ --- Significant natural resources Ageing population structure World-class high level expertise High unemployment but also lack of (forest bioeconomy) skilled labour force Strong cooperation between Decline of infrastructure (roads) different actors Geographical handicaps: long Russia as
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in Political Economy
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Essays in Political Economy A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Imil Nurutdinov 2019 © Copyright by Imil Nurutdinov 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Essays in Political Economy by Imil Nurutdinov Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Leslie Nicole Johns, Co­Chair Professor Ronald L. Rogowski, Co­Chair This dissertation studies the determinants of political institutions and their impact on economic development in various historical contexts. The first chapter focuses on the Catholic Church, which for centuries determined the political, economic, and cultural development of Europe and was the greatest and most enduring rival to the nation­state. Why did the Church’s power decline earlier in Northwestern Europe than in the East and South? I argue that to a large extent the differential political influence of the Church can be explained by differential demand for collective security in the face of the possible invasion by the militarily superior “infidels.” Catholic states had to cooperate to achieve military success. To mitigate the interstate collective action problem, Catholic states voluntarily delegated legal and fiscal authorities to a common non­territorial jurisdiction, which was the Church. States in Northwestern Europe had lower demand for protection against the “infidels,” therefore, commitment to the Church was weaker. To measure the Church’s political power across time and space at the subnational (diocesan) level, I have assembled a novel dataset on appointments of bishops between 1198 and 1517, the beginning of the Protestant Reformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Between North Karelia, Finland, and Kaunas, Lithuania, from 1971 to 1987
    516 Br Heart J 1992;68:516-23 EPIDEMIOLOGY Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.68.11.516 on 1 November 1992. Downloaded from Comparison of trends in ischaemic heart disease between North Karelia, Finland, and Kaunas, Lithuania, from 1971 to 1987 Daiva Rastenyte, Veikko Salomaa, Harri Mustaniemi, Dalia Rasteniene, Regina Grazuleviciene, Zygimantas Cepaitis, Jari Kankaanpaa, Kari Kuulasmaa, Jorma Torppa, Juozas Bluzhas, Jaakko Tuomilehto Abstract Conclusions-Despite the remarkable Objective-To compare the long-term decline in the occurrence of ischaemic trends in mortality and attack rate of heart disease, it still remains the most ischaemic heart disease in North Karelia, important cause of premature mortality Finland, and in Kaunas, Lithuania, from in North Karelia. In Kaunas ischaemic 1971 to 1987. heart disease mortality and attack rate Design-Data on routine mortality increased in men. Experiences from suc- statistics were obtained from the Central cessful cardiovascular disease prevention Statistical Office of Finland and from the programmes in western countries, such Central City Archives of Kaunas. In ad- as the North Karelia Project, should be dition, data from the community based exploited to prevent an increasing myocardial infarction registers were epidemic of ischaemic heart disease in used. The registers used similar diagnos- eastern Europe. tic criteria and had operated in both areas during the entire study period. (Br Heart J 1992;68:516-23) Setting-The province ofNorth Karelia in Finland and the city of Kaunas in During the late 1950s and the early 1960s Lithuania. several western countries, including Finland, http://heart.bmj.com/ Subjects-The target populations were experienced a considerable increase in mor- the people of North Karelia and Kaunas tality and morbidity from ischaemic heart dis- aged 35-64 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Karelia Project in Finland
    ISSUE 5 · MARCH 2013 In this issue The North Karelia Project in Finland: A portrait of the North Karelia Project, the A societal shift favouring healthy lifestyles basis for community programs in chronic 2 disease prevention. In the early 1970s, the coronary heart disease mortality rate in Finland was the highest in the world, and North Karelia was the most affected. In every family in the region, physically active men in their prime were dying And answers to the following prematurely. questions The goal of the North Karelia Project was to reverse the situation by changing the population’s lifestyles. The goal was successfully attained: in 35 years, • What were the project’s goals? death by coronary heart disease in the North Karelia population dropped • What actions were taken in this context, and 85%. To this day, the project still serves as a model in promoting healthy what results were obtained? lifestyles.(1) • What were the details surrounding the community mobilization that contributed to the project’s success? • Is the success of the North Karelia Project transferable? What is TOPO? The TOPO collection is produced by the multidisciplinary team on nutrition, physical activity, and weight-related problems prevention (Nutrition, activité physique et prévention des problèmes reliés au poids or NAPP)1 at the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). The collection disseminates knowledge to inform the choices of practitioners and decision makers in the prevention North Karelia is a region of Finland with a population of 166 000 spread over an area of 21 585 km2. Traditionally of weight-related problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Riitta Helevä Sculptor
    Riitta Helevä Sculptor Pikisaarentie 7 B1 90100 Oulu, Finland +358 40 721 2887 [email protected] www.kuvataiteilijamatrikkeli.fi/fi/taiteilijat/349 Studies 1976-1981 Helsinki University of Art and Design, Department of Product and Environment Design / Ceramic Art 1975-1976 Helsinki University of Art and Design / Adult Training Center Solo exhibitions 2012 ”Under the Same Heaven” Aine Art Museum, Tornio ”Just like in Dreams” Nelimarkka Museum, Alajärvi 2011 ”Earth remembers” K.H. Renlund Museum, Kokkola 2009 Galleria Harmaja, Oulu Galleria G, Helsinki 2002 Galleria Tyko, Nurmes Galleria G, Helsinki 2000 Galleria Harmaja, Oulu 1996 TM-galleria, Helsinki 1992 Galleria Sculptor, Helsinki 1991 Galleria Okra, Vantaa 1990 ”Seven Silent Guards” sculptures on the seashore, Pikisaari, Oulu 1985 Town Hall, Kuusamo Galleria Sculptor, Helsinki 1983 Oulu Art Museum Selected group exhibitions 2014 ”The Cloudholder´s Heirs” P. Nukari and T. Junno &Helevä, Kaulanen, Meskanen-Barman, Nieminen, Tiisala Art and Museum Centre Sinkka, Kerava 2012 ”The Snowball Effect” - The North Finland Biennial, Oulu Art Museum ”Päivät kohoavat” - Riitta Helevä – Petri Yrjölä, Kemi Art Museum 2010 ”Arctic Heat” - Helevä, Kiuru, Miettunen, Pernu, Södö Galerie Wedding, Berlin 2005 ”Contemporary Birch Bark” Galleria 5, Oulu 2003 VIII Mänttä Art Festival 2001 ”Hokkarikukkia” - The Wihuri Art Foundation, Helsingin Taidehalli and Oulu Art Museum 1998 Annual Exihibition of the Union of Finnish Art Associations, Savonlinna Art Museum 1997 ”Maila Talvio-Salon”, Hartola 1992
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Origins of Finns Revealed by Y Chromosome Haplotype Variation Rick A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62:1171–1179, 1998 Dual Origins of Finns Revealed by Y Chromosome Haplotype Variation Rick A. Kittles,1 Markus Perola,4 Leena Peltonen,4 Andrew W. Bergen,2 Richard A. Aragon,2 Matti Virkkunen,5 Markku Linnoila,3 David Goldman,2 and Jeffrey C. Long1 1Section on Population Genetics and Linkage, 2Laboratory of Neurogenetics, and 3Laboratory of Clinical Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; 4Department of Human Molecular Genetics, National Public Health Institute, and 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki Summary studies on genetic disorders, has increased rapidly. At present, there are 133 rare genetic diseases that are more The Finnish population has often been viewed as an prevalent in Finland than in other populations (de la isolate founded 2,000 years ago via a route across the Chapelle 1993). The high prevalence of these rare dis- Gulf of Finland. The founding event has been charac- eases has been attributed to founder effects resulting terized as involving a limited number of homogeneous from Finland’s unique population history. This unique- founders, isolation, and subsequent rapid population ness is conspicuously reflected by the fact that, unlike growth. Despite the purported isolation of the popula- most other Europeans, Finns do not speak an Indo-Eur- tion, levels of gene diversity for the Finns at autosomal opean language. Finnish is a member dialect of the Uralic and mitochondrial DNA loci are indistinguishable from language family, whose only other speakers within Eu- those of other Europeans.
    [Show full text]
  • POKAT 2021: North Karelia's Regional Strategic Programme For
    POKAT 2021 North Karelia’s Regional Strategic Programme for 2018–2021 Contents Foreword The regional strategic programme is a statutory regional devel- Sustainable Foreword 3 AIKO opment programme that must be taken into consideration by European growth and jobs Regonal Current state of North Karelia 6 the authorities. It states the regional development objectives, Territorial 2014-2020, innovations and which are based on the characteristics and opportunities spe- Cooperation structural fund experiments Focus areas of the Regional Strategic Programme 8 cific to the region in question. The programme is drawn up for a Programmes programme (Interreg) ”Small” 1. Vitality from regional networking – Good accessibility and operating environment 8 four-year period. The POKAT 2021 North Karelia Regional Stra- tegic Programme is for the period 2018–2021. regional policy Accessibility, transport routes and connections 8 National and international networks 8 The regional strategic programme describes and consolidates CBC programmes EU, national, supraregional and regional level strategies as well (external border) 2. Growth from renewal – A diverse, sustainable and job-friendly economic structure 10 as the municipal and local level strategies. Despite the multi- Europe 2020 Strategy, Forest bioeconomy 10 sectoral overall approach, the aim is for the programme to have White Paper on the Future ”Large” specific focus areas. Concrete measures are described in the ac- of Europe 2025, 7th cohesion regional policy Technology industries 10 tion plan of the strategic programme and in individual sectoral report, EU Strategy for National objectives for Stone processing and mining 10 strategies and action plans. Separate EU the Baltic Sea Region, regional development Tourism 11 POKAT 2021 is the North Karelia Regional Strategic Programme programmes for the 2018–2021 period.
    [Show full text]
  • North Karelia Project
    Pekka Puska Director General National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) Helsinki, Finland Past President, World Health Federation (WHF) The North Karelia project Europrevent Geneva 15.4.2011 5/6/2011 Greetings from Finland 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General History in Finland • Hardships of war and postwar years • Increase in standard of living Great increase in CVD • Attention to extremely high CVD mortality • Previous studies: East-West study (part of Seven Countries Study) 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General 69 10 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General North Karelia Project Principles • Due to the chronic nature of CVD, the potential for the control of the problem lies in primary prevention • The risk factors were chosen on the basis of best available knowledge: - previous studies - collective international recommendations - epidemiological situation in North Karelia • Chosen risk factors: - smoking - elevated serum cholesterol (diet) - elevated blood pressure (diet & treatment • Community based approach to change lifestyles 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General Theory + hard work • Theory: Medical Behavioural, social • Hard work: practical and flexible work with the community 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General From Karelia to National Action • First province of North Karelia as a pilot (5 years), then national action (1972–77) • Continuation is North Karelia as national demonstration (1977–97) • Good scientific evaluation to learn of the experience • Comprehensive national action 5/6/2011 Pekka Puska, Director General
    [Show full text]