Plan De Gestión

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plan De Gestión JULIO 2017 Plan de Gestión Parque Nacional Laguna Blanca ADMINISTRACIÓN DE PARQUES NACIONALES Plan de Gestión Parque Nacional Laguna Blanca ÍNDICE Equipo de Planificación .............................................................................................................. 5 1. Introducción: 1.1. Alcance geográfico y temporal del plan ........................................................................ 6 1.2. Equipo planificador y resumen metodológico del proceso de elaboración del plan .. .7 1.3. Información general del área: 1.3.1. Ubicación geográfica, superficie, límites y eco-región ....................................... 8 1.3.2. Historia de creación del área protegida y marco legal ..................................... 10 1.3.3. Objetivos de creación, categoría de manejo y designaciones internacionales 13 1.3.4. Objetivos de conservación ................................................................................ 14 1.4. Contexto nacional y regional .......................................................................................... 15 2. Caracterización: 2.1 Descripción recursos físicos, naturales, culturales y socio económicos A. Recursos Físico-Naturales 2.1.1. Geología, geomorfología .................................................................................. 17 2.1.2. Suelos ............................................................................................................... 22 2.1.3. Hidrología ......................................................................................................... 23 2.1.4. Clima ................................................................................................................. 28 2.1.5. Flora -Clasificación de ambientes – ................................................................. 28 2.1.6. Fauna ................................................................................................................ 41 B. Recursos Culturales y Socioeconómicos 2.1.7. Caracterización histórica de ocupación humana: información arqueológica. 46 2.1.8. Reseña de la historia de la ocupación del territorio desde finales del siglo XIX.51 2.1.9. Caracterización poblacional y socio-productiva 2.1.9.1. Pobladores rurales del Parque Nacional Laguna Blanca ......................... 52 2.1.9.2. Caracterización socio-demográfica y condiciones de vida ....................... 54 2.1.10. Caracterización de los usos 2.1.10.1. Uso ganadero actual ............................................................................... 59 2.1.10.1.1 Uso ganadero por parte de productores que habitan el Parque Nacional Laguna Blanca .... 61 2.1.10.1.2 Uso ganadero por parte de productores ocupantes de tierras fiscales en áreas circundantes al Parque Nacional Laguna Blanca ..................... 63 2.1.10.1.3. Uso ganadero por parte de productores Trashumantes .................. 64 2.1.10.1.4. Caracterización situación de ocupación y uso no reconocido por la APN 2.1.10.2. Caracterización del uso público .............................................................. 68 1 PLAN DE GESTIÓN – PARQUE NACIONAL LAGUNA BLANCA JULIO 2017 2.2 Valores de conservación: (Identificación de valores de conservación -naturales y culturales-, priorización y breve caracterización). .................................................... 73 2.3 Aspectos institucionales: (Recursos humanos, infraestructura y equipamiento, investigaciones en el área). 2.3.1. Evaluación del cumplimiento del Plan 1993 .................................................... 76 2.3.2. Recursos actuales para la gestión del área protegida ...................................... 79 3. Diagnóstico general de valores, recursos (Valores de conservación, Usos, Problemas y Amenazas) y problemática de gestión 3.1. Diagnóstico de valores de conservación 3.1.1. Humedales y sus cuencas ................................................................................. 86 3.1.2. Comunidades vegetales ................................................................................... 90 3.1.3. Diagnóstico general de fauna ........................................................................... 94 3.1.4. Diagnóstico del patrimonio cultural ................................................................. 98 3.2. Diagnóstico de usos y recursos a gestionar .............................................................. 101 3.3. Diagnóstico de la problemática de gestión del área protegida ............................... 108 3.4. Síntesis de problemáticas de conservación uso y gestión del área protegida ......... 109 4. Zonificación interna del Área / Propuesta de ZAM 4.1. Zonificación (según Plan de Manejo 93) .................................................................. 110 4.2. Zonificación interna del Área ................................................................................... 110 4.3. Propuesta de ZAM .................................................................................................... 114 5. Objetivos y Estrategias del Plan de Gestión 5.1. Objetivos ................................................................................................................... 115 5.2. Estrategias ................................................................................................................ 117 6. Programas, proyectos y actividades 6.1. Programa de operaciones ........................................................................................ 119 6.1.1. Subprograma de administración .................................................................... 122 6.1.2. Subprograma de obras y mantenimiento ...................................................... 127 6.1.3. Subprograma de control, fiscalización y emergencias ................................... 129 6.2. Programa de uso público 6.2.1. Subprograma de recreación y turismo ........................................................... 132 6.2.2. Subprograma de interpretación, educación ambiental y difusión ................ 137 2 PLAN DE GESTIÓN – PARQUE NACIONAL LAGUNA BLANCA JULIO 2017 6.3. Programa de conservación y uso sustentable del patrimonio natural y cultural 6.3.1. Subprograma de investigación y monitoreo .................................................. 138 6.3.2. Subprograma de protección y recuperación .................................................. 151 6.3.3. Subprograma de uso sustentable................................................................... 167 6.3.4. Subprograma de asentamientos humanos .................................................... 171 7. Implementación, seguimiento y evaluación 7.1. Implementación y seguimiento ................................................................................ 174 7.2. Evaluación ................................................................................................................. 175 8. Bibliografía citada y consultada ..................................................................................... 177 9. Anexos Anexo I: Cartografía ......................................................................................................... 185 Mapa Nº 1: Ubicación General ........................................................................................ 186 Mapa Nº 2: Cartografía base del área protegida ............................................................ 187 Mapa Nº 3: Reservas Naturales Estricta y Silvestre ........................................................ 188 Mapa Nº 4: Unidades ambientales ................................................................................. 189 Mapa Nº 5: Unidades fisonómico-florísticas ................................................................... 190 Mapa Nº 6: Ubicación de asentamientos de pobladores ............................................... 191 Mapa Nº 7: Áreas de uso de los pobladores .................................................................. 192 Mapa Nº 8: Zonificación del Plan de Manejo 1993 ......................................................... 193 Mapa Nº 9: Zonificación del Plan de Gestión 2016 ......................................................... 194 Mapa Nº 10: Zona de amortiguamiento ......................................................................... 195 Anexo II: Listas de especies ............................................................................................. 196 Listado de especies de flora del PNLB ............................................................................ 197 Listado de especies de fauna PNLB, incluyendo estado de conservación ...................... 206 Listado de especies de flora endémica y amenazada del PNLB ...................................... 211 Listado de Especies de Valor Especial de fauna .............................................................. 214 Anexo III. Tablas Tabla: Resumen de Caracterización de Unidades fisonómico-florísticas PNLB .............. 216 10. Apéndices ........................................................................................................................ 221 Apéndice I. Proceso de participación Apéndice II. Priorización de valores de conservación Apéndice III. Informe Zona de Amortiguamiento Apéndice IV. Informe de Evaluación de programas del Plan de Manejo 1993 3 PLAN DE GESTIÓN – PARQUE NACIONAL LAGUNA BLANCA JULIO 2017 Apéndice V. Planes temáticos Plan de Uso Ganadero Plan de Uso Público Programa de Conservación y Manejo del patrimonio Cultural del PNLB Plan de Recuperación Ecológica del Sistema de la Laguna Blanca 4 PLAN DE GESTIÓN – PARQUE NACIONAL LAGUNA
Recommended publications
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXONOMY Plant Family Species Scientific Name Coldenia Nuttallii
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Tiquilia nuttallii ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/TINU2.pdf TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Boraginaceae Common Name Borage family Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Tiquilia nuttallii (Hook.) A.T. Richardson Varieties None Sub-species None Cultivar None Common Synonym(s) Coldenia nuttallii (Hook.) Common Name(s) Nuttall’s crinklemat, Rosette tiquilia, Nuttall’s tiquilia Species Code (as per TINU2 USDA Plants database) All images (that aren’t maps) from 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, and a distinct population in Missouri 1,2,5,11 Maps from right to left 10,11 Ecological Desert sands, sandy loam/sandy plains, washes, slopes/hillsides, saline flats 2,6 distribution Climate and Climate Tolerances: 33-41ºC elevation range Elevation Range: ~0-2500m 1,5,8 Local habitat and Most common in desert-like habitats, common associations include plants abundance from the genera of Artemisia, Atriplex, Chrysothamnus, Juniperus, Larrea, and Pinus. 2,5,6 Plant strategy type / Tolerant of dry, desert environments. Is generally an early successional plant successional stage commonly found in disturbed habitats such as roadsides and building developments 3 Plant characteristics Herbaceous annual forb/herb with shrub-like characteristics. Dichotomously branched, slender stems woody when older, strigose. Leaves are green, ridged, have hairs, and are ovate. Flowers
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Evidence for the Age, Origin, and Evolutionary History of the American Desert Plant Genus Tiquilia (Boraginaceae)
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39 (2006) 668–687 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular evidence for the age, origin, and evolutionary history of the American desert plant genus Tiquilia (Boraginaceae) Michael J. Moore ¤, Robert K. Jansen Section of Integrative Biology and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A6700, Austin, TX 78712, USA Received 30 August 2005; revised 11 January 2006; accepted 12 January 2006 Available online 21 February 2006 Abstract Although the deserts of North America are of very recent origin, their characteristic arid-adapted endemic plant lineages have been sug- gested to be much older. Earlier researchers have hypothesized that the ancestors of many of these modern desert lineages Wrst adapted to aridity in highly localized arid or semi-arid sites as early as the late Cretaceous or early Tertiary, and that these lineages subsequently spread and diversiWed as global climate became increasingly arid during the Cenozoic. No study has explicitly examined these hypotheses for any North American arid-adapted plant group. The current paper tests these hypotheses using the genus Tiquilia (Boraginaceae), a diverse North American desert plant group. A strongly supported phylogeny of the genus is estimated using combined sequence data from three chloroplast markers (matK, ndhF, and rps16) and two nuclear markers (ITS and waxy). Ages of divergence events within the genus are estimated using penalized likelihood and a molecular clock approach on the ndhF tree for Tiquilia and representative outgroups, including most of the major lineages of Boraginales. The dating analysis suggests that the stem lineage of Tiquilia split from its nearest extant relative in the Paleocene or Eocene (»59–48 Ma).
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory Annotated Catalog of Vascular Plants
    Flora of the Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory Annotated Catalog of Vascular Plants Updated June 2013 Ann M. Howald This updated catalog for the flora of the Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory (SNARL) includes all vascular plants identified during field studies conducted from 1978 through spring 2013. Taxonomic nomenclature is mainly consistent with The Jepson Manual, Second Edition (Baldwin et al. 2012). The families, genera, and species are arranged alphabetically. The scientific name of each species is followed by a common name of popular usage. No attempt was made to determine all common names that might apply to a given species. Scientific names of native species are in bold type; those of introduced species are in plain type. Annotations for all taxa include: 1) life form (e.g., annual herb, perennial herb, etc.); 2) flower color; and 3) the general abundance and distribution at SNARL. For flowering plants, the approximate flowering period in the eastern Sierra is given. Locations of most landscape features mentioned in the text (e.g., headquarters building, stream control structure 3, etc.) and numbering of the stream control structures, are as shown on current maps of SNARL. The most recent previously applied scientific name is given in brackets. A voucher specimen deposited at a herbarium participating in the Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH) is cited for most taxa. A set of duplicate herbarium specimens is housed at SNARL. DIVISION SPHENOPHYTA Equisetaceae. Horsetail Family Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun. Smooth Scouring Rush. Rhizomatous perennial herb. Occasional in moist areas near Convict Creek, near the laboratory and other buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants of Utah
    DESERT PLANTS OF UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen Revised May 1996 HG 505 FOREWORD The original Desert Plants of Utah by Berniece A. Andersen has been a remarkably popular book, serving as a tribute to both her botanical knowledge of the region and to her enthusiastic manner. For these reasons, we have tried to retain as much of the original work, in both content and style, as possible. Some modifications were necessary. We have updated scientific names in accordance with changes that have occurred since the time of the first publication and we have also incorporated new geographic distributional data that have accrued with additional years of botanical exploration. The most obvious difference pertains to the organization of species. In the original version, species were organized phylogenetically, reflecting the predominant concepts of evolutionary relationships among plant families at that time. In an effort to make this version more user-friendly for the beginner, we have chosen to arrange the plants primarily by flower color. We hope that these changes will not diminish the enjoyment gained by anyone familiar with the original. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor TABLE OF CONTENTS The Nature of Deserts ........................................................1 Utah’s Deserts ........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants and Species Checklist Of
    Vascular Plant Species Checklist of Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, Montana and Wyoming Prepared for the National Park Service - Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area and the Greater Yellowstone Network By Bonnie Heidel and Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming PO Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 January 2002 . Table of Contents Page # Abstract . 4 Acknowledgments . 4 Introduction . 5 Study Area . 5 Methods . 8 Results . 9 Summary of Plant Inventory Work at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 9 Flora of Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 11 Noxious Weed Documentation . 12 Additional Rare Plant Records in Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 12 Discussion . .. 14 Literature Cited . 16 Cover caption: Additions to the Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area flora include Castilleja exilis (Big Horn County, WY), Dodecatheon conjugens (Big Horn and Carbon cos., MT), Oxytropis besseyi var. ventosa (Carbon County, Montana), and Rosa arkansana (Big Horn County, Montana; starting upper left, moving clockwise.) 2 Figures, Tables, and Appendices Page # Figure 1. Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 7 Figure 2. Increase in Number of Plant Taxa Recorded at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, 1924-2001 . 15 Table 1. Chronology of Major Plant Collecting Efforts at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 10 Table 2. Summary of the Flora of Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 12 Table 3. Summary of the Flora of Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area by County Subunits . 12 Table 4. State Noxious Weeds Confirmed or Reported from Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area . 13 Table 5. Increase in Number of Plant Taxa Recorded at Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area, 1924-2001 .
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the Lower San Francisco Volcanic Field, Coconino County, Arizona Author(S): Kyle Christie Source: Madroño, 55(1):1-14
    Vascular Flora of the Lower San Francisco Volcanic Field, Coconino County, Arizona Author(s): Kyle Christie Source: Madroño, 55(1):1-14. Published By: California Botanical Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637(2008)55[1:VFOTLS]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/ full/10.3120/0024-9637%282008%2955%5B1%3AVFOTLS%5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. MADRON˜ O, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE LOWER SAN FRANCISCO VOLCANIC FIELD, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA KYLE CHRISTIE Deaver Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640 [email protected] ABSTRACT The San Francisco Volcanic Field lies near the southern edge of the Colorado Plateau in north- central Arizona, and is dominated by an extensive Pinyon-Juniper woodland.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with an Emphasis on Perdita (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2018 Foraging Behavior, Taxonomy, and Morphology of Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with an Emphasis on Perdita (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Zachary M. Portman Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Portman, Zachary M., "Foraging Behavior, Taxonomy, and Morphology of Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with an Emphasis on Perdita (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae)" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7040. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7040 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORAGING BEHAVIOR, TAXONOMY, AND MORPHOLOGY OF BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APOIDEA), WITH AN EMPHASIS ON PERDITA (HYMENOPTERA: ANDRENIDAE) by Zachary M. Portman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Ecology Approved: _________________________ _________________________ Carol von Dohlen, Ph.D. Terry Griswold, Ph.D. Major Professor Project Advisor _________________________ _________________________ Nancy Huntly, Ph.D. Karen Kapheim, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member _________________________ _________________________ Luis Gordillo, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Zachary M. Portman 2018 All Rights Reserved1 1 Several studies have been published previously and others remain to be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. As such, a disclaimer is necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Vascular Plants at Mojave National Preserve & Manzanar Historic Site
    Inventory of Vascular Plants at Mojave National Preserve & Manzanar Historic Site For U.S. National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Camissonia boothii ssp. boothii Prepared by James M. André University of California Riverside, Granite Mountains Desert Research Center November 15, 2006 Contract Number: P2128020178 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 National Inventory and Monitoring Program and Mojave Network 1 1.2 Program Overview 1 1.3 Regional Context and Significance 2 1.3.1 Mojave National Preserve 2 1.3.2 Manzanar Historic Site 4 1.4 Objectives 5 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Herbarium Surveys 7 2.1.1 Database and Bibliographic Query 7 2.2 Field Surveys 7 2.2.1 Mojave National Preserve 7 2.2.2 Manzanar Historic Site 8 2.3 Voucher Specimens 8 2.4 Survey Timing 9 2.5 Field Investigators 9 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Level of Effort 10 3.2 Summary of Findings - Manzanar Historic Site 10 3.3 Summary of Findings - Mojave National Preserve 14 3.3.1 Field Surveys 14 3.3.2 New Vascular Plant Taxa for MOJA 14 3.3.3 Special-Status Plants 33 3.3.4 Non-Native Alien Plants 40 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Summary 41 4.2 Recommendations 41 Acknowledgements 43 5.0 REFERENCES 44 i List of Maps, Tables and Appendices Map 1. Distribution of all Area Searches in Priority Locations, Targeted Surveys, and Opportunistic Surveys conducted in the Mojave National Preserve, 2002 – 2005. 15 Table 1. Checklist of vascular plant taxa known to occur in the Manzanar Historic Site.
    [Show full text]