U.S.-China Scientific Exchange: a Case Study of State-Sponsored Scientific Internationalism During the Cold War and Beyond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S.-China Scientific Exchange: a Case Study of State-Sponsored Scientific Internationalism During the Cold War and Beyond ZUOYUE WANG* U.S.-China scientific exchange: A case study of state-sponsored scientific internationalism during the Cold War and beyond IN FEBRUARY 1972 President Richard Nixon of theUnited States embarked on his historic journey to Beijing. The dramatic tripnot only opened a new era in U.S.-China relations, but also began an exciting process ofmutual discovery be tween the two peoples. If it is true that, as the China scholar A, Doak Barnett wrote, "never in themodern period have twomajor societies been so isolated from each other for so long in peacetime," the end of the schism also brought forth unprecedented exchanges inmany walks of life, especially in academia.1 The geopolitical move by the two countries to counter Soviet aggression paved the way for interactions in science and other fields. The contacts flourished through the 1970s and expanded even furtherafter the establishment of diplomatic rela tions and the launching of China's economic reformsby the end of the 1970s. This intellectual open door proved to have profound social and political, as well as scientific, impact, especially in China, which had just begun to emerge from the devastating Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976. Despite itsconsiderable significance, scientificexchange has often been treated as a sideline inU.S.-China relations. Several excellent studies examine U.S.-China academic and educational exchanges, but theybarely touch on the scientific com *Department of History, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768. I thank Richard Suttmeier, Lawrence Badash, H. Lyman Miller, Gene Rochlin, Wolfgang Panofsky, Xiaojian Zhao, Fan Dainian, JimWilliams, Peter Westwick, Jessica Wang, and Benjamin Zulueta for reading drafts of the paper and for stimulating discussions and com ments. Translations from Chinese documents are my own. Generally, names of Chinese in mainland China are rendered in piny in with family names first and given names last. For Chinese Americans and Chinese in Taiwan, names are usually spelled in theWade-Giles style, with given names first and family names last: e.g., Chen Ning Yang, with the excep tion of Tu Wei-Ming, who uses Wade-Giles but places his family name first and given name second. 1. A. Doak Barnett, China and the major powers in East Asia (Washington, D.C., 1977), 178, as quoted in Harry Harding, A fragile relationship: The United States and China since 1972 (Washington, D.C., 1992), 33; Leo A. Orleans, Science in China and U.S.-China scientific exchanges: Assessment and prospects (Washington, D.C., 1976), 11, estimated in 1976 thatabout 10,000Americans visitedChina between 1971 and 1976. HSPS, 30:1 (1999) 250 Z. WANG ponents, thus obscuring the part that science and technology played in the devel oping relationship. Most of these studies focus on the impact of academic ex changes in theU.S. and leave the political, social, and cultural impact of such exchanges on Chinese society unexamined.2 This paper examines theU.S.-China scientific reopening as a case study of scientific nationalism and internationalism. Here we are concerned not somuch with specific exchange projects as with the political context and implications of the exchange as a whole. What, for example, did the exchange mean toChinese science and Chinese scientists,many of whom had suffered, along with other in tellectuals, horrible persecution at thehands ofMao Zedong's radical Red Guards during theCultural Revolution? How did American scientists respond to the new opportunities? Above all, what does this storyof scientific exchange tell us about scientific nationalism and internationalism during theCold War? In considering these questions, we will look not only at the two national scien tific communities involved but at also the special subnational group of Chinese American scientistswho were crucial in the forging of this new international sci entific network. They, along with Chinese scientistswho were trained in theU.S. in the 1930s and 1940s, helped to stimulate and sustain the exchange program. In turn,the U.S.-China reopening did much to give them a political voice and helped them form a distinct scientific community. The narrative covers mainly theperiod from 1971, when the firstmoves in the reopening took place, up to 1989, when the Chinese government's crackdown on the pro-democracy demonstration at Tiananmen Square produced a hiatus in the exchange and introduced new dynam ics inU.S.-China relations. But we will also take a brief look at the 1990s, when this community of Chinese American scientists evolved into a transnational scien tificnetwork of theChinese diaspora and when some of these scientistswere ac cused by theU.S. government of spying for China in the areas of nuclear and defense technologies. The present study thus examines interactions of scientific communities at three levels, the subnational, the national, and the international, during theCold War and beyond. 2. David M. Lampton, A relationship restored: Trends in U.S.-China educational exchanges, 1978-1984 (Washington, D.C., 1986); Leo A. Orleans, Chinese students inAmerica: Poli cies, issues, and numbers (Washington, D.C., 1988). See also Kathlin Smith, "The role of scientists in normalizing U.S.-China relations, 1965-1979," and Richard R Suttmeier, "Sci entific cooperation and conflict management in U.S.-China relations, 1978 to the present," unpublished papers, 1998, courtesy of the authors; Denis Fred Simon, "The role of science and technology in Chinese foreign relations," in Samuel S. Kim, ed., China and the world: Chinese foreign policy in the post-Mao era (Boulder and London, 1984), 293-318. There is also little written about U.S.-Taiwan scientific exchange, which should make a fascinating comparison with the U.S.-China case. Although it is beyond the scope of the present paper, I intend to address aspects of that story in the future. U.S.-CHINA SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE 251 State-sponsored scientific internationalism The U.S.-China scientific exchange provides a case of what might be termed state-sponsored scientific internationalismduring theCold War, when nation-states, often for geopolitical reasons, established the framework for communication and collaboration among scientists across national boundaries. This was in contrast to themore traditional, private form of scientific internationalism that relied on per sonal scientific communication beforeWorld War II. Prominent examples of the latter included the travel of scientists to enemy territories in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to conduct scientific research.3 The statewas mostly absent or passive. Nationalism did surge during and immediately followingWorld War I, as Entente scientists launched a boycott against theirGerman colleagues. Max Planck lamented the division as an "unnatural mixture of science and politics."4 Yet, itwas often the national scientific communities, inGermany and elsewhere, rather than the governments, thatmost actively promoted or manipulated the ide ology of scientific nationalism.5 In the interwaryears, "private" internationalism soon revived as physicists fromaround theworld, often financed by theRockefeller Foundation, traveled toGermany, Denmark, and England to study the new quan tummechanics and nuclear physics. Chinese scientists also benefited from and joined in thismovement of people and ideas. Most pioneering Chinese physicists in themodern era, for example, received their graduate training in theU.S. or Europe in the early twentieth century. Chinese biologists exchanged specimens with colleagues in theWest.6 World War II, especially theManhattan Project, started state internationalism in science in earnest, although traditional,personal networks among scientists con tinued to play an importantrole. To make the atomic bomb, theU.S., Britain, and Canada pooled resources and scientists under formal governmental agreements. During the ensuing Cold War, state internationalism flourished when theworld was divided into two hostile camps in the late 1940s and 1950s, and persisted even when realignment and detente in the 1960s and 1970s changed the early pattern of bipolar conflict. Both theNATO andWarsaw-pact alliances sponsored fraternal scientific cooperation. The U.S. and Britain exchanged information, albeit lim ited, on nuclear weapons. Scientists from theEastern bloc worked with each other 3. Lawrence Badash, "British and American views of the German menace inWorld War I," Royal Society of London, Notes and records, 34 (1979), 91-121. 4. J.L. Heilbron, The dilemmas of an upright man: Max Planck as spokesman for German science (Berkeley, 1986), 104. 5. Ibid., 109; Paul Forman, "Scientific internationalism and theWeimar physicists: The ideology and itsmanipulation inGermany afterWorld War I," Isis, 64 (1973), 151-180; Daniel Kevles, "'Into hostile political camps': The reorganization of international science inWorld War I," Isis, 62 (1971), 47-60. 6. Peter Neushul and Zuoyue Wang, "Between the devil and the deep sea: C.K. Tseng, ocean farming, and the politics of science inmodern China," unpublished paper. 252 Z. WANG at theDubna nuclear research center in the Soviet Union.7 Using Dubna's 10-GeV accelerator, Chinese physicists led byWang Ganchang discovered an elementary particle, the anti-sigma negative hyperon, in the late 1950s, widely regarded as the onlymajor achievement in thehistory of thatmachine.8 Until the Sino-Soviet split became public in the early 1960s, thousands of Soviet scientists and engineers also went towork inChina as advisors. China sent students,
Recommended publications
  • Confession, Redemption, and Death: Liu Xiaobo and the Protest Movement of 1989
    Confession, Redemption, and Death: Liu Xiaobo and the Protest Movement of 1989 Geremie Barmé1 There should be room for my extremism; I certainly don’t demand of others that they be like me... I’m pessimistic about mankind in general, but my pessimism does not allow for escape. Even though I might be faced with nothing but a series of tragedies, I will still struggle, still show my opposition. This is why I like Nietzsche and dislike Schopenhauer. Liu Xiaobo, November 19882 I FROM 1988 to early 1989, it was a common sentiment in Beijing that China was in crisis. Economic reform was faltering due to the lack of a coherent program of change or a unified approach to reforms among Chinese leaders and ambitious plans to free prices resulted in widespread panic over inflation; the question of political succession to Deng Xiaoping had taken alarming precedence once more as it became clear that Zhao Ziyang was under attack; nepotism was rife within the Party and corporate economy; egregious corruption and inflation added to dissatisfaction with educational policies and the feeling of hopelessness among intellectuals and university students who had profited little from the reforms; and the general state of cultural malaise and social ills combined to create a sense of impending doom. On top of this, the government seemed unwilling or incapable of attempting to find any new solutions to these problems. It enlisted once more the aid of propaganda, empty slogans, and rhetoric to stave off the mounting crisis. University students in Beijing appeared to be particularly heavy casualties of the general malaise.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Control and Social Contestation in China's
    Science in Movements This book analyzes and compares the origins, evolutionary patterns and consequences of different science and technology controversies in China, including hydropower resistance, disputes surrounding genetically modified organisms and the nuclear power debate. The examination combines social movement theories, communication studies, and science and technology studies. Taking a multidisciplinary approach, the book provides an insight into the interwoven relationship between social and political controls and knowledge monopoly, and looks into a central issue neglected by previous science communication studies: why have different con- troversies shown divergent patterns despite similar social and political contexts? It is revealed that the media environment, political opportunity structures, knowledge-control regimes and activists’ strategies have jointly triggered, nur- tured and sustained these controversies and led to the development of different patterns. Based on these observations, the author also discusses the significance of science communication studies in promoting China’ssocialtransformation and further explores the feasible approach to a more generic framework to understand science controversies across the world. The book will be of value to academics of science communication, science and technology studies, political science studies and sociology, as well as general readers interested in China’s science controversies and social movements. Hepeng Jia is a professor of communication at Soochow University, Suzhou, China. He has worked as a leading science journalist for 20 years and is also a pioneering researcher in the field of science journalism and communication in China. Chinese Perspectives on Journalism and Communication Series Editor: Wenshan Jia is a professor of communication at Shandong University and Chapman University. With the increasing impact of China on global affairs, Chinese perspectives on journalism and communication are on the growing global demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China Merle David Kellerhals Jr
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Institute for the Humanities Theses Institute for the Humanities Summer 1998 Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China Merle David Kellerhals Jr. Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Kellerhals, Merle D.. "Wei Jingsheng and the Democracy Movement in Post-Mao China" (1998). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, Humanities, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/7pt4-vv58 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Humanities at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for the Humanities Theses by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEI JINGSHENG AND THE DEMOCRACY MOVEMENT IN POST-MAO CHINA by Merle David Kellerhals, Jr B A. May 1995, College of Charleston A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HUMANITIES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 1998 Approved by: Jin Qiu (Director) hen Jie (Member) David Putney (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1391982 Copyright 1999 by Kellerhals/ Merle David, Jr. All rights reserved. UMI Microform 1391982 Copyright 1998, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY CHINA: a BOOK LIST (Winter 1999 — FIRST ON-LINE EDITION, MS Word, L&R Margins 0.9") by Lynn White
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST (Winter 1999 — FIRST ON-LINE EDITION, MS Word, L&R margins 0.9") by Lynn White This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of the seminars WWS 576a/Pol. 536 on "Chinese Development" and Pol. 535 on "Chinese Politics," as well as the undergraduate lecture course, Pol. 362; --to provide graduate students with a list that can help their study for comprehensive exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not too much should be made of this, because some such books may be too old for students' purposes or the subjects may not be central to present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan. Students with specific research topics should definitely meet Laird Klingler, who is WWS Librarian and the world's most constructive wizard. This list cannot cover articles, but computer databases can. Rosemary Little and Mary George at Firestone are also enormously helpful. Especially for materials in Chinese, so is Martin Heijdra in Gest Library (Palmer Hall; enter up the staircase near the "hyphen" with Jones Hall). Other local resources are at institutes run by Chen Yizi and Liu Binyan (for current numbers, ask at EAS, 8-4276). Professional bibliographers are the most neglected major academic resource at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinitic Language and Script in East Asia: Past and Present
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 264 December, 2016 Sinitic Language and Script in East Asia: Past and Present edited by Victor H. Mair Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino- Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out to be refereed, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • US-China Relations
    U.S.-China Relations: An Overview of Policy Issues Susan V. Lawrence Specialist in Asian Affairs August 1, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41108 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-China Relations: An Overview of Policy Issues Summary The United States relationship with China touches on an exceptionally broad range of issues, from security, trade, and broader economic issues, to the environment and human rights. Congress faces important questions about what sort of relationship the United States should have with China and how the United States should respond to China’s “rise.” After more than 30 years of fast-paced economic growth, China’s economy is now the second-largest in the world after that of the United States. With economic success, China has developed significant global strategic clout. It is also engaged in an ambitious military modernization drive, including development of extended-range power projection capabilities. At home, it continues to suppress all perceived challenges to the Communist Party’s monopoly on power. In previous eras, the rise of new powers has often produced conflict. China’s new leader Xi Jinping has pressed hard for a U.S. commitment to a “new model of major country relationship” with the United States that seeks to avoid such an outcome. The Obama Administration has repeatedly assured Beijing that the United States “welcomes a strong, prosperous and successful China that plays a greater role in world affairs,” and that the United States does not seek to prevent China’s re-emergence as a great power.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Vita Peter J. Stang Personal Data
    VITA PETER J. STANG PERSONAL DATA: BORN: November 17, 1941, Nurnberg, Germany CITIZENSHIP: U.S.A. (Naturalized, June, 1962) MARRIED: 1969, Christine M.E. Schirmer CHILDREN: Antonia (b. 1973); B.S. Brown Univ. 1995; M.D. and MBA McGill Univ. 2001 Alexandra (b. 1977); Honors B.S. Univ. of Utah 2000 ADDRESS: 1406 S Chancellor Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108 Chemistry Department, 315 S 1400 E, Rm. 2020, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 PHONE: Office – (801) 581-8329; Home – (801) 581-9749; FAX: Office – (801) 581-8433 EDUCATION B.S. Chemistry, 1963, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois (Magna Cum Laude) Ph.D., Chemistry, 1966, University of California, Berkeley (NIH Fellow, with A. Streitwieser) Postdoctoral, 1966-68, Princeton University (NIH Fellow, with P.v.R. Schleyer) ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE David P. Gardner Chair of Chemistry, 2014-present Distinguished Professor of Chemistry, University of Utah, 1992-present Dean, College of Science, University of Utah, 1997-2007 Chairperson, Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, 1989-1995 Professor, University of Utah, 1979-1992 Honorary Professor of Chemistry, CAS Institute of Chemistry, Beijing, China Honorary Professor, Zhejiang Univ., East China Normal Univ. and East China Univ. of Science and Technology, Soochow University, Nanjing Normal University, University of Science & Technology of China Senior Fellow, Loker Hydrocarbon Research Inst., U. of Southern Calif. 1991-Present Visiting Scientist, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1978 Associate Professor, University of Utah, 1975-79 Assistant Professor, University of Utah, 1969-75 Instructor, Princeton University, 1968-69 RESEARCH INTERESTS Molecular Architecture via Coordination: Formation of discrete supramolecular species with well defined geometries and shapes via self-assembly (molecular triangles, squares, rectangles, pentagons, hexagons, 3D assemblies).
    [Show full text]
  • Government and the Scientific Community. Before His Death in 1998 Due to an Illness, He Was Especially Delighted to See the Buil
    ndsbv7_Z 9/27/07 3:28 PM Page 402 Zhu Zhu government and the scientific community. Before his March 1890; d. Beijing, China, 7 February 1974), mete- death in 1998 due to an illness, he was especially delighted orology, climatology, geography, education, science policy. to see the building and successful operation of the Beijing Zhu was a founder of modern meteorology and geog- Electron-Positron Collider in the IHEP in the 1980s and raphy in China who made significant contributions to the 1990s, the result of a collaboration between the United studies of typhoons, rainfall patterns, phenology, geo- States and China in high-energy physics. graphic regions, and, especially, historical climate change of China. He also played a prominent role in science pol- BIBLIOGRAPHY icy, higher education, natural resources surveys, the his- There is no known depository of Zhao’s correspondence or tory of science, and popularization of science in China in unpublished papers but presumably some of them are contained the twentieth century. in the archives at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and its Institute of High Energy Physics in Beijing. A fairly complete list Early Years and Education. Zhu’s father, Zhu Jiaxian, was of his scientific publications are included in Zhao Zhongyao a rice merchant in Shaoxing and his mother Gu Jinniang, lunwen xuanji (Selected papers of Zhao Zhongyao), 1992. a devout Buddhist, ran a busy household with six chil- dren. Kezhen was the youngest in the family. Like many WORKS BY ZHAO of the prominent figures in Chinese history who origi- “The Problem of the Ionized Hydrogen Molecule.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of nated in the region, Zhu was reared in an environment America 15, no.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Strategic Modernization: Implications for the United States
    CHINA’S STRATEGIC MODERNIZATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES Mark A. Stokes September 1999 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications and Production Office by calling commercial (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or via the Internet at [email protected] ***** Selected 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://carlisle-www.army. mil/usassi/welcome.htm ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-004-4 ii CONTENTS Foreword .......................................v 1. Introduction ...................................1 2. Foundations of Strategic Modernization ............5 3. China’s Quest for Information Dominance ......... 25 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Rocket and Satellite Sectors$ Andrew S
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy Acta Astronautica 103 (2014) 142–167 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro China's space development history: A comparison of the rocket and satellite sectors$ Andrew S. Erickson a,b,n,1 a U.S. Naval War College, United States b John King Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies, Harvard University, United States article info abstract Article history: China is the most recent great power to emerge in aerospace. It has become the first Received 3 March 2014 developing nation to achieve some measure of aerospace production capability across Received in revised form the board. Outside the developed aerospace powers, only China has demonstrated 16 May 2014 competence concerning all aspects of a world-class aerospace industry: production of Accepted 16 June 2014 advanced rockets, satellites, and aircraft and of their supporting engineering, materials, Available online 26 June 2014 and systems. As an emerging great power during the Cold War, China was still limited in Keywords: resources, technology access, and capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • ZHENG Zhemin Honored with State Supreme S&T Award CAS
    Vol.27 No.2 2013 InBrief ZHENG Zhemin Honored with State Supreme S&T Award For his pioneering and lasting contributions to explosive mechanics in China, Prof. ZHENG Zhemin from the Institute InBrief of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences received the State Supreme S&T Award, which is the highest honor for science workers in China, from President HU Jintao on January 18, 2013 at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. Prof. ZHENG has been engaged in the study of explosive mechanics for over six decades. Born in 1924 in Shandong Province as the son of a successful businessman, ZHENG suffered from the Second World War and was determined to do something for his nation as a boy. During his senior year at Tsinghua University, he was inspired by his teacher QIAN Weichang, China’s late “father of mechanics” and became very interested in mechanics. In 1952 he earned his PhD from the California Institute of Technology under the supervision of Prof. QIAN Xuesen, who later became ZHENG (R) receives the award from Chinese President HU Jintao (L). the founding father of China’s space and missile programs. ZHENG returned to China in 1955, joined the Chinese Mechanics and founding director of the State Key Laboratory Academy of Sciences and soon started his investigations into for Nonlinear Mechanics. He is a laureate of the Tan Kah Kee the mechanism of explosions. He proposed the basic theories Science Award in 1993. and technologies for explosive modeling, and his research “I didn’t expect such a supreme award. I’m very was applied to the manufacturing of key components of the delighted.
    [Show full text]
  • 党和国家领导人重视民间外交工作 Party and State Leaders Attach Importance to People-To-People Diplomacy
    fmfd-c5.indd 1 11-3-29 上午8:46 党和国家领导人重视民间外交工作 Party and State Leaders Attach Importance to People-to-people Diplomacy 寄希望于人民。 如果只有两国政府的合作 用民间外交的办法,不管 发展民间外交,有利于增 Hopes are placed on the people. 而没有民间交往,两国关系是 从历史上看,还是从现在看, 进各国人民的友谊,有利于促 不可能有扎实基础的。 都有非常重要的作用。 进各国经济、文化的交流和合 State relations would lack a solid China’s people-to-people diplomacy, 作,有利于为国家关系的发展 foundation if there were only governmental whether viewed from a historical cooperation but no people-to-people perspective or from the present, has 奠定广泛的社会群众基础。 contacts. played a very important role. To develop people-to-people diplomacy helps enhance friendship between the peoples, promote economic and cultural exchanges and cooperation among the countries and lay a broad social mass foundation for the development of state relations. 2-p1-11-s5.indd 1 11-3-29 上午8:47 前 言 中国人民对外友好协会成立于 1954 年 5 月,它是中华人民共和国 从事民间外交事业的全国性人民团体,以增进人民友谊、推动国际合 作、维护世界和平、促进共同发展为工作宗旨。它代表中国人民同各国 对华友好的团体和各界人士进行友好交往,在世界舞台上为中国人民的 正义事业争取国际同情,努力为国家总体外交、祖国建设与和平统一、 世界和谐服务。目前,我会与全国 300 多个地方友协密切合作,与世界 上 157 个国家的近 500 个民间团体和机构建立了友好合作关系,是沟通 中国人民和世界人民友谊的桥梁。 Foreword The Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries was established in May 1954. It is a national people’s organization engaged in people-to-people diplomacy of the People’s Republic of China. The aims of the Association are to enhance people-to-people friendship, further international cooperation, safeguard world peace, and promote common development. On behalf of the Chinese people, it makes friendly contacts with China-friendly organizations and personages of various circles in other countries, strives to gain international support for the just cause of the Chinese people on the world arena, and works in the interests of China’s total diplomacy, national construction and peaceful reunification and world harmony.
    [Show full text]