Ecosystem Services in Australian Statutory Water Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecosystem Services in Australian Statutory Water Planning Ecosystem services in Australian statutory water planning Water allocation plan for part of the Tindall limestone aquifer near Katherine, NT The Plan: Wa t e r Al l o c a t i o n Pl a n - T i n d a l l Li m e s t o n e Aq u i f e r , Ka t h e r i n e Schedule 2 Daly Roper Water Control District ARAFURA SEA VAN DIEMEN GULF Darwin BEAGLE GULF wy em H Jabiru Arnh y w H u d a k a K d R m he rn l A Bulman Pine tra Nauiyu en Creek C Katherine Ngukurr Mataranka D y a w r S w H t u a i i n r r t o t A ic H l w Timber V i c y e Creek S p r i n g s R a i l w a Ca y Daly rpe ntaria Darwin Waters Hwy B uc Katherine hanan Hwy Tennant Creek LEGEND Alice Boundary - Daly Roper Water Springs Control District Boundary - Water Allocation Plan Area, 0 50 100 km Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) 41 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT Water Allocation Plan – Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) December 2008 3. Description of this Water Source and its Dependent Ecosystems 3.1 General The Tindall Limestone Aquifer is the oldest of three geological formations that comprise the Daly Sedimentary Basin and spans beneath the catchments of the Daly and Roper Rivers as shown in Map 1. Water from the Tindall aquifer discharges into many of the river systems within these catchments, including the Katherine, Flora, Douglas and Roper Rivers. Darwin ay ighw em H Jabiru Arnh y a w h g S i tu H rt u d H a ig k hw a ay K d R m he rn A al Bulman Nauiyu tr Pine Creek en C Dallyy RiRivverr Katherine Cattcchmentt Roper y Roper Ngukurr a w h RivRiverr ig H a Catctchmentt ri Mataranka to ic V Timber Creek C arpe ntaria Daly Waters Hig hway S t u a r t H i g h w a y LEGEND Daly Roper Water Control District Daly Sedimentary Basin 050100 km NT Locality Surface Water Catchment Tindall Limestone Aquifer Map 1: Tindall Limestone aquifer with respect to the Daly and Roper River catchments Page 9 The Plan: Wa t e r Al l o c a t i o n Pl a n - T i n d a l l Li m e s t o n e Aq u i f e r , Ka t h e r i n e Schedule 3 The Plan area – Defined by the extent of Tindall Limestone within the Katherine River Catchment Town of Katherine D a ly R iv S er tu art C h Hig ai hw nm a a y n C k r e iv R ne theri r Ka e y iv a R w igh H g a K in ri in K cto g Vi L R im ive e r s S t c o o n t e t C C k k M a th is on C k r e iv R ry D Daly Roper Water Control District 0 50 100 km 0 10 20 km Katherine LEGEND LEGEND Boundary - Water Allocation Plan Area, Water Allocation Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) Plan Area 1km buffer from Tindall aquifer Water Control District Tindall Limestone - Unconfined Tindall Limestone Aquifer Tindall Limestone - Confined 42 Background: Wa t e r A l l o c a t i o n P l a n - Ti n d a l l Li m e s t o n e A q u i f e r , K a t h e r i n e the streams that cut across the basin. In the central part of the Daly groundwater basin where the Tindall Aquifer is at considerable depth, only minor flow is considered to occur. The aquifer is unconfined in places around the basin margin, where it outcrops close to the surface. As described in section 3.1, the Tindall Aquifer is largely confined by younger geologic formations. Recharge is highest in the unconfined areas and negligible where it is confined by the Jinduckin Formation. Recharge can be redu ced in the unconfined area where overlying cretaceous rocks are present. Discharge zones are mainly located along the major rivers and comprise both karstic springs and more diffuse streambed discharge. The sections along the Katherine River where discharge from the Tindall Aquifer is known to occur are shown in Map 4. Donkey Camp S tu Knotts Crossing ar t H ig hw ay Tindall Limestone Aquifer discharge to Katherine River High Level Bridge TOWN OF KATHERINE r Rive ay hw ig Katherine H ria to ic V Galloping Jacks Water Allocation Plan Area, Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) 0 2 4 km Katherine 0 20 km S tua rt H wy y w H LEGEND a ri to ic River location point V Boundary - Water Allocation Plan Area, Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) 1km buffer from Tindall aquifer Tindall Limestone - Unconfined Tindall Limestone - Confined Map 4: Discharge Zones into the Katherine River within the Plan Area 61 BACKGROUND DOCUMENT Water Allocation Plan – Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) December 2008 Committee Member Representing Organisation Ms Anne Shepherd Chairperson Katherine Town Council Ms Jodie Locke Local Government Alderman, Katherine Town Council Mr Rohan Sullivan Pastoral Chairman, NTCA Benefits Mr John Etty Conservation Organic horticultural producer in the Katherine Region and Mr Preston Lee Indigenous - Jawoyn Trainee manager, Jawoyn Association Aboriginal Corporation beneficia Mr Bill Harney Indigenous - Traditional Owner, Katherine Wardaman Region Mr Gary Want Department of Defence Manager Base services, Tindal icares… Mr Warren De With Recreation President, Amateur Fisherman’s Association NT Mr David Higgins Horticulture / Horticulturalist, Katherine Agriculture Region Mr David George Power and Water Natural Systems Engineer, Corporation PWC Mr Mick Peirce Community Irrigator, Katherine Mr Mick Jerram Tourism Owner, Gecko Tours, Katherine Mr Peter Sinnott Industry / Commerce Farm Manager, Manbulloo Mangoes, Katherine The Northern Territory Government advisors, whom have provided continual direction and information to the KWAC, are liste d in the table below: Water Resource Planner Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport Hydrogeologist Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport District Agronomist Department of Regional Development, Primary Industry, Fisheries and Resources Page 7 Result - regulations • Extraction limit of 34,500 ML/yr • No more than 15% of licensed extraction within zone 1 The Plan: Wa t e r Al l o c a t i o n Pl a n - T i n d a l l Li m e s t o n e Aq u i f e r , Ka t h e r i n e Schedule 5 Water Management Zones L NT Por e NT Por NT Por ig h 1061 5626 t 5800 NT Por NT Por Cr e 6771 e 782 k St ua NT Por rt H 4923 ig hw NT Por NT Por ay 5062 6288 NT Por LOT NT Por 4924 NT Por 3010 2887 5415 NT Por NT Por 4446 4391 NT Por TOWN OF NT Por 4001 KATHERINE 2873 River NT Por 6492 y a NT Por hw NT Por ig 2830 H 5819 Katherine ria to ic NT Por V 3362 NT Por 1604 Water Allocation Plan Area, Tindall Limestone Aquifer Katherine (Katherine) 0 20 40 km 0 20 km St uar t Hw LEGEND y y w H Boundary - Water Allocation Plan Area, ria to ic Tindall Limestone Aquifer (Katherine) V Zone 1 (< 1 year) Short term lag between extraction and impact on the Katherine River Zone 2 (> 1 year) Medium to long term lag between extraction and impact on the Katherine River Cadastral property boundaries 44 Annual allocations based on protecting flows spring flows into river Recognising the broader benefits of aquatic systems in water planning: an ecosystem services approach Roel Plant, Clare Taylor, Mark Hamstead and Tim Prior Waterlines Report Series No 87, August 2012 NATIONAL WATER COMMISSION — WATERLINES i • To systematically and transparently identify, describe and communicate the benefits and beneficiaries of aquatic systems, the services and ecosystem processes that underpin these and, importantly, the links between them Table 2.1 Conceptual representation of a generic benefits table (see section 3 for more detail ) Beneficiaries Benefits Services Processes water regime other processes, essentially functions or conditions generates a identify beneficiaries, benefits, services & processes (starting either end) program map… show how changes in water regimes etc affect benefits & b e n e For example: For example: For example: f · all residents of · clean water · water Water regime Other processes that i Basis for planning area · attractive purification characteristics that support the listed c · subset of areas to services support listed services as determined i residents of live/work near water supply services as by scientific studies · a defined by eg: - consultation planning area · income system & r scientific studies · carbon cycling · Indigenous provided by drainage i eg: · nutrient cycling communities use of aquatic · healthy e · low flows and analysis · Australian system floodplain & · sedims ent capture and community · protection from riverside · in-channel release · irrigators water related plants freshes · food webs - Outcomes · commercial hazards · regulation of · floodplain · catchment sediment fishers · water for bank & inundation retentionetc · tourism/recreation industry channel and workers · attractive erosion · walkers areas for · mitigation of · 4WDers recreation algal blooms strategies · recreational · sense of & pollution fishers home, well- · mitigation of · sporting clubs being, joy etc water temperature & - Measuring local climate · flood performance mitigation · frog calls, sun sparkling on water, bird song etc Increasing amount of scientific input Components of the benefits table Beneficiaries Beneficiaries are the people to whom benefits from aquatic ecosystems accrue.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Values and Resource Use in the Limmen Bight
    NATURAL VALUES AND RESOURCE USE IN THE LIMMEN BIGHT REGION © Australian Marine Conservation Society, January 2019 Australian Marine Conservation Society Phone: +61 (07) 3846 6777 Freecall: 1800 066 299 Email: [email protected] PO Box 5815 West End QLD 4101 Keep Top End Coasts Healthy Alliance Keep Top End Coasts Healthy is an alliance of environment groups including the Australian Marine Conservation Society, the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Environment Centre of the Northern Territory. Authors: Chris Smyth and Joel Turner, Centre for Conservation Geography Printing: Printed on 100% recycled paper by IMAGE OFFSET, Darwin. Maps: Centre for Conservation Geography This report is an independent research paper prepared by the Centre for Conservation Geography commissioned by, and for the exclusive use of, the Keep Top End Coasts Healthy (KTECH) alliance. The report must only be used by KTECH, or with the explicit permission of KTECH. The matters covered in the report are those agreed to between KTECH and the authors. The report does not purport to consider exhaustively all values of the Limmen Bight region. The authors do not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation, compensatory, direct, indirect, or consequential damages and claims of third parties that may be caused directly or indirectly through the use of, reliance upon or interpretation of the contents of the report. Cover photos: Main - Limmen River. Photo: David Hancock Inset (L-R): Green Turtle, Recreational fishing is an important leisure activity in
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of the Mataranka Area 4
    THE BIG PICTURE SPRINGS OF THE MATARANKA AREA 4. THE SWAMP Timor Sea A cavernous limestone aquifer extends The large swampy area located on the south side of across a large part of the Northern Territory the Roper River also owes it’s existence to a and into Queensland. The springs at The Mataranka area is notable for its many springs. geological structure that has caused the aquifer to DARWIN Mataranka are one of several outlet points for become shallower and to thin out towards the Roper the aquifer. Other big springs are found on 295000mE This map shows the location of the main springs and other groundwater discharge features. River (see the cross-section). This has resulted in a the Flora, Katherine and Daly Rivers and in broad area underlain by a shallow watertable and Queensland on the Lawn Hill Creek and It explains why the springs are there and describes some of their characteristics. zones of seepage. Extensive tufa deposits formed there because a ridge of bedrock located downstream Daly River Springs KATHERINE Gulf Gregory River. At Mataranka the water of originates from areas to the southeast as far of the seepage zone, ponded the water in a similar Flora River Springs MATARANKA Carpentaria away as the Barkly Tablelands and from the manner to the rock bars in streams as described in 300000mE northwest as far as the King River. Qa1 the note on tufa formation. The ridge formed a base for tufa to accumulate. Tufa dams merged and grew - Waterhouse Cmt over older ones, eventually forming a continuous sheet of limestone.
    [Show full text]
  • Testudines: Chelidae) of Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002, 134, 401–421. With 7 figures Electrophoretic delineation of species boundaries within the genus Chelodina (Testudines: Chelidae) of Australia, New Guinea and Indonesia ARTHUR GEORGES1*, MARK ADAMS2 and WILLIAM McCORD3 1Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 2Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia 3East Fishkill Animal Hospital, 285 Rt 82, Hopewell Junction NY 12533, USA Received February 2001; revised and accepted for publication June 2001 A total of 281 specimens of long-necked chelid turtles (Chelodina) were obtained from drainages of Australia, Papua New Guinea and the island of Roti in Indonesia. Ten diagnosable taxa were identified using allozyme profiles at 45 presumptive loci. Chelodina expansa, C. parkeri, C. rugosa and C. burrungandjii are in a Group A clade, C. longi- collis, C. novaeguineae, C. steindachneri, C. pritchardi and C. mccordi are in a Group B clade, and C. oblonga is in a monotypic Group C clade, with each clade thought to represent a distinct subgenus. Chelodina siebenrocki is syn- onymised with C. rugosa. An eleventh taxon, C. reimanni, could not be distinguished from C. novaeguineae on the basis of allozyme profiles, but it is morphologically distinct. Its status is therefore worthy of further investigation. Three instances of natural hybridization were detected. Chelodina rugosa and C. novaeguineae hybridize in the Gulf country of Queensland, with evidence of backcrossing to C. novaeguineae. Chelodina longicollis and C. novaeguineae hybridize in central coastal Queensland, and C. rugosa and C. burrungandjii hybridize along their zone of contact in the plateau escarpment streams and pools.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No
    Flood Watch Areas Arnhem Coastal Rivers Northern Territory River Basin No. Blyth River 15 Buckingham River 17 East Alligator River 12 Goomadeer River 13 A r a f u r a S e a Goyder River 16 North West Coastal Rivers Liverpool River 14 T i m o r S e a River Basin No. Adelaide River 4 below Adelaide River Town Arnhem Croker Coastal Daly River above Douglas River 10 Melville Island Rivers Finniss River 2 Island Marchinbar Katherine River 11 Milikapiti ! Island Lower Daly River 9 1 Elcho ! Carpentaria Coastal Rivers Mary River 5 1 Island Bathurst Nguiu Maningrida Galiwinku River Basin No. Island 12 ! ! Moyle River 8 ! Nhulunbuy 13 Milingimbi ! Yirrkala ! Calvert River 31 South Alligator River 7 DARWIN ! ! Howard " Oenpelli Ramingining Groote Eylandt 23 Tiwi Islands 1 2 Island 17 North West 6 ! 14 Koolatong River 21 Jabiru Upper Adelaide River 3 Coastal 15 Batchelor 4 Limmen Bight River 27 Wildman River 6 Rivers ! 16 7 21 McArthur River 29 3 5 ! Bickerton Robinson River 30 Island Daly River ! Groote Roper River 25 ! ! Bonaparte Coastal Rivers Bonaparte 22 Alyangula Eylandt Rosie River 28 Pine 11 ! 9 Creek Angurugu River Basin No. Coastal 8 Towns River 26 ! ! Kalumburu Rivers Numbulwar Fitzmaurice River 18 ! Walker River 22 Katherine 25 Upper Victoria River 20 24 Ngukurr 23 Waterhouse River 24 18 ! Victoria River below Kalkarindji 19 10 Carpentaria G u l f 26 Coastal Rivers ! o f ! Wyndham Vanderlin C a r p e n t a r i a ! 28 Kununurra West Island Island 27 ! Borroloola 41 Mount 19 Barnett Mornington ! ! Dunmarra Island Warmun 30 (Turkey 32 Creek) ! 29 Bentinck 39 Island Kalkarindji 31 ! Elliott ! ! Karumba ! 20 ! Normanton Doomadgee Burketown Fitzroy ! Crossing Renner ! Halls Creek ! Springs ! ! Lajamanu 41 Larrawa ! Warrego Barkly ! 40 33 Homestead QLD ! Roadhouse Tennant ! Balgo Creek WA ! Hill Camooweal ! 34 Mount Isa Cloncurry ! ! ! Flood Watch Area No.
    [Show full text]
  • In Ngukurr: a Remote Australian Aboriginal Community
    Understanding ‘Work’ in Ngukurr: A Remote Australian Aboriginal Community Eva McRae-Williams (BA, BBH, MA) September 2008 Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for: Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) Charles Darwin University Statement of Authorship Except where referenced in the text of the research project, this dissertation contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or part from a thesis or report by me for another degree or diploma. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the dissertation. The dissertation has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. Eva McRae-Williams Date: ……………… ii Abstract This thesis is an ethnographic study of the ‘work’ ideologies inherent in a remote Australian Aboriginal community; Ngukurr in South East Arnhem Land of the Northern Territory. Formerly known as the Roper River Mission and established in 1908, it is today home to approximately 1000 Aboriginal inhabitants. Fieldwork for this project was conducted in three phases between 2006 and 2007 totalling seven months. The aim of this research was to gain an insight into the meaning and value of ‘work’ for Aboriginal people in Ngukurr. First, this involved acknowledging the centrality of paid employment to mainstream western ‘work’ ideology and its influence on my own, and other non-Aboriginal peoples, understandings and ways of being in the world. Through this recognition the historical and contemporary relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in the northern part of Australia, specifically the Roper River region, was found to be fundamentally shaped by labour relations and dominant western ‘work’ ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Water Study Roper River Region
    Gulf Water Study Roper River Region Front cover: Painting of the Rainbow Serpent by Rex Wilfred. (see Appendix A for the story of the painting) Satellite image of the Roper River. Yawurrwarda Lagoon. GULF WATER STUDY Early morning at Roper Bar, Roper River WATER RESOURCES OF THE ROPER RIVER REGION REPORT 16/2009D U. ZAAR DARWIN NT © Northern Territory of Australia, 2009 ISBN 978-1-921519-64-2 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was co -funded through the Australian Government Water Smart Australia Program and the Northern Territory Government Department of Natural Resources, Environment the Arts and Sport. I would like to thank my colleagues who provided help on this project: Peter Jolly (now retired) who instigated this project; Des Yin Foo for his generous support as our team manager; Anthony Knapton, my co-worker on this project who provided technical and field assistance; Steve Tickell, Danuta Karp and Jon Sumner for their technical advice; Lynton Fritz for his outstanding cartographic skills in drawing up the maps; Renee Ramsay for the production of the GIS and collation of the DVD and our experienced technical team – Rodney Metcalfe, Steve Hester, Roger Farrow and Rob Chaffer for all their efficient fieldwork. A special thanks also to Phil O’Brien who not only provided enthusiastic field assistance but wise advice. I take pleasure in also thanking members of our technical working group; Max Gorringe - the manager of Elsey Station, Frank Shadforth – the manager of Seven Emu Station and Glenn Wightman – ethnobiologist who all kindly took the time to provide advice at our meetings. All were always ready to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Survey Report For
    Threatened species ‘likelihood of occurrence’ assessment This ‘likelihood of occurrence’ assessment identifies which threatened species have potential to occur within the project footprint. The following procedure was used to determine the likelihood of occurrence of threatened species: 1) Identify potential habitat features within the project footprint using available desktop information (i.e. land unit mapping, existing vegetation mapping, aerial imagery, fire history etc.). 2) Identify: a. Matters of National Environmental Significance obtained using the Protected Matters Search Tool (undertaken January 2017). b. Bioregional threatened species records extracted from the NT flora and fauna atlases maintained by DENR. 3) Collate the following details for each of those species – conservation status (NT and Federal), habitat requirements, distribution and number of records within the bioregions. 4) Analyse the likelihood that each species will occur in the project footprint by applying the following likelihood classifications: a. HIGH – it is expected that this species will be within the project footprint because of the presence of core suitable habitat, and/or there are recent proximate records (i.e. post-2000). b. MEDIUM – this species may occur within the project footprint; however, there is evidence that lowers its likelihood of occurrence (i.e. lack of core habitat, no recent records with the search area, habitat degradation etc.). c. LOW – it is not expected that this species is supported within the project footprint, as there is no suitable habitat for the species and/or current threats in the region are known to have significantly impacted upon the species. d. NONE – there is strong evidence that this species will not occur within the project footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • (Genus Myuchelys), with Special Reference to the Endangered M. Bellii
    Vol. 17: 63–71, 2012 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online April 12 doi: 10.3354/esr00417 Endang Species Res Mitochondrial variation among Australian freshwater turtles (genus Myuchelys), with special reference to the Endangered M. bellii Darren Fielder1,*, Karl Vernes1, Erika Alacs2, Arthur Georges2 1Ecosystem Management, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia 2Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia ABSTRACT: Identifying species and the relationships among them remains important for assess- ing biodiversity trends and is a critical focus for reversing global biodiversity loss. The saw-shelled turtles of Australia, in the genus Myuchelys, show cryptic diversity and include species that range from Endangered (M. bellii), through those that are locally abundant but extremely limited in dis- tribution (M. georgesi and M. purvisi) to those that are common and widespread (M. latisternum). The Endangered M. bellii is restricted to 3 small isolated populations in the headwaters of the Murray-Darling basin, in the Border, Gwydir and Namoi tributaries. There is no evidence of strong differentiation among these 3 populations based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diver- gences; rather there is only a shallow genetic structure ranging from 0.1 to 0.3% divergence. The 3 restricted and small populations of the Endangered M. bellii face a number of threatening pro- cesses and require conservation management across state boundaries as a single biological spe- cies. The mtDNA phylogeny supports previous phylogenetic findings of a deep phylogenetic divergence between M. purvisi and M. georgesi (13.5% mtDNA) and the sister taxa relationship of M. latisternum and M.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVANNAH WAY SUGGESTED Stock up the Four-Wheel Drive with Camping and Fishing Gear, and Hit the Savannah Way
    DO THE NORTHERN TERRITORY DO SAVANNAH WAY SUGGESTED Stock up the four-wheel drive with camping and fishing gear, and hit the Savannah Way. This journey of a lifetime will take you from Cairns in QueenslandSAVANNAH through the Savannah lands of Northern Territory WAYand on to Broome in the West. The route20 is mainly DAY sealed highway although thereNORTHERN are some long stretches TERRITORY of gravel road and several DRIVE challenging ROUTEfour-wheel drive routes to tackle.ITINERARY Pine Creek NITMILUK (KATHERINE GORGE) Peppimenarti NATIONAL PARK Manyallaluk KATHERINE Barunga Roper Bar CUTTA CUTTA CAVES ELSEY NATURE PARK NATIONAL PARK GULF OF GREGORY Mataranka Roper Hwy Nathan River Rd CARPENTARIA NATIONAL PARK STUART Timber Creek Larrimah KEEP RIVER Victoria Buntine Hwy NATIONAL PARK River Borroloola Victoria Hwy Daly Waters Hi-Way Inn GREGORY NATIONAL PARK Top Springs Carpentaria Hwy Cape Dunmarra Crawford Buchanan Hwy Newcastle Kalkarindji Waters Wollogorang Elliott Buntine Hwy Pack up the four-wheel drive with camping and fishing gear, andBarkly hit Stock the Route Savannah Way.Calvert This Rd journey of a lifetime will take you from Cairns in Queensland through the savannah landscapes of the Northern Territory and on to Broome in the West. The route follows a mostly sealedRenner Springs highway although there are some long DOstretches BORROLOOLALajamanu of gravel road and four-wheel drive trails1 to take. DO MATARANKA 5 Next to the MacArthur River, Borroloola is Mataranka, a small community located only a Must Do along Savannah Way. This fishing 100km south of Katherine, is more than just a enthusiastsDO BORROLOOLA paradise has excellent estuary DO VICTORIA RIVER stopover on the Explorers Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Place in the Cosmopolitan World of Indo-West Pacific
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43 (2007) 645–659 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev An island in the stream: Australia’s place in the cosmopolitan world of Indo-West Pacific freshwater shrimp (Decapoda: Atyidae: Caridina) Timothy J. Page a,*, Kristina von Rintelen b, Jane M. Hughes a a Australian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Qld., 4111, Australia b Museum of Natural History, Humboldt-University Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115, Berlin, Germany Received 3 May 2006; revised 5 August 2006; accepted 8 August 2006 Available online 18 August 2006 Abstract Mitochondrial DNA sequences were used to investigate phylogenetic and biogeographic relationships among Australian freshwater shrimp from the genus Caridina H. Milne Edwards, 1837 (Atyidae) and congeners from potential source populations throughout the Indo-West Pacific region. Numerous Australian taxa have close evolutionary relationships with non-Australian taxa from locations throughout the region, indicating a diverse origin of the Australian freshwater fauna. This implies many colonisations to or from Aus- tralia over a long period, and thus highlights the surprising adeptness of freshwater shrimp in dispersal across ocean barriers and the unity of much of the region’s freshwater biota. Interestingly, a study on Australia’s other main genus of atyid shrimp, Paratya Miers, 1882, inferred only a single colonisation. A number of potential species radiations within Australia were also identified. This agrees with patterns detected for a large number of Australian freshwater taxa, and so implies a vicariant explanation due to the development of colder, dryer climates during the late Miocene/early Pliocene. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Australian Tropical Rivers to Predict Climate Change Impacts
    Classification of Australian Tropical Rivers to Predict Climate Change Impacts Wayne ErskineA,C,M.J. Saynor B and J LowryB ACentre for the Sustainable Use of Coasts and Catchments, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia. BEnvironmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia CCorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract. The preliminary typology of Australian tropical rivers proposed by Erskine et al. (2005) was applied to the complete channel network (named and major rivers) shown on the 1:250,000 topographic maps for three large drainage basins in northern Australia (Daly River, NT; Fitzroy River, WA; Flinders River, Qld) using remotely sensed data, topographic and geologic maps and relevant published literature. This work is part of the Tropical Rivers Inventory and Assessment Project funded by Land and Water Australia. Significantly this is the first time that the whole channel network of all three rivers has been classified into homogeneous river reaches based on geomorphic criteria. Previous river classification exercises on these rivers have only investigated a minor component of the total channel network. The nine river types of Erskine et al. (2005) were revised by additions, amalgamations and deletions to 12 to accommodate the full range of river types present. The 12 river types mapped as homogeneous river reaches were: (1) bedrock rivers; (2) confined and constrained rivers; (3) low sinuosity rivers; (4) meandering rivers; (5) wandering rivers; (6) anabranching rivers; (7) chain of ponds; (8) gullies; (9) floodouts; (10) lakes, swamps or billabongs; (11) non-channelised valley floors; and (12) estuarine rivers.
    [Show full text]