The Decline of Elkhorn Coral at Buck Island Reef National Monument

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Decline of Elkhorn Coral at Buck Island Reef National Monument Summer 2008 • Volume 25 • Number 1 www.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience National Park Service PARKScience U.S. Department of the Interior Integrating Research and Resource Management in the National Parks THREATENED CORAL AT BUCK ISLAND REEF Monitoring captures the devastating 2005 bleaching event of the barrier reef • Learning center goes virtual • The Park Science interview: Mike Soukup • Remembering Eric York • Adaptive management for national parks 3 Contents 832 42 DEPARTMENTS SCIENCE FEATURES From the Editor 2 The decline of elkhorn coral at Buck Island Reef National Monument: 36 Protecting the fi rst threatened coral species In This Issue 5 Monitoring captures the devastating 2005 bleaching event of the barrier reef that Comments & Corrections 6 surrounds a newly expanded national monument in the Virgin Islands. By Ian Lundgren 20 Years Ago in Park Science 7 Sidebar: Basic ecology of elkhorn coral and threats to its survival. 42 Tribute 8 Eric York Assessing the effects of ungulates on natural resources at Assateague 44 Profi le 10 Island National Seashore Interview with Mike Soukup Research is beginning to suggest a new management approach to what has been a controversial park management issue. Information Crossfi le 14 By Mark Sturm Science Notes 23 Sidebar: Saving the seabeach amaranth. 50 Field Moment 87 CASE STUDIES Collaboration of the Natural Resource and Museum programs: 52 A research tool for information archives at Dinosaur National Monument ON THE COVER Archivist and curator secure, protect, catalog, and ensure access to a wealth of information, resulting in an archival processing and cataloging handbook for many users. Tropical marine habitats of the U.S. By Lynn Marie Mitchell and Ann Elder Virgin Islands host reef communities such as the elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) of Buck Island Reef National Using virtual Research Learning Centers for disseminating science 56 Monument. Elkhorn coral is one of information about national park resources the fi rst coral species to be protected One-stop shopping for science information about natural and cultural park resources. under the Endangered Species Act. By Tomye Folts-Zettner, Tom Olliff, Cheryl McIntyre, and Tom Porter Surveys in 2003–2004 determined the species’ distribution and documented wave damage, predation, disease, and other stressors such as bleaching. Investigators continue monitoring the effects of the severe bleaching event of 2005 (see page 36). NATIONAL PARK SERVICE/HANK TONNEMACHER 36 PARK SCIENCE • VOLUME 25 • NUMBER 1 • SUMMER 2008 Science Feature The decline of elkhorn coral at Buck Island Reef National Monument: Protecting the fi rst threatened coral species By Ian Lundgren UCK ISLAND REEF NATIONAL proclamation describes the monument prescribed in the original park purpose, al- Monument lies just north of the and its “adjoining shoals, rocks, and lowing fi shing in some areas but protecting Bisland of St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin undersea coral reef formations” as “one of others. In 2001 the relatively small na- Islands. When it was established in 1961, the fi nest marine gardens in the Caribbean tional monument was expanded to 19,015 the park encompassed 176-acre (71 ha) Sea,” which are of “great scientifi c interest acres (7,695 ha), and all forms of resource Buck Island and 704 acres (285 ha) of and educational value to students of the extraction were completely prohibited marine habitat surrounding it. The park sea and to the public.” Multiple use was (fi g. 1). Figure 1. Map of Buck Island Reef National Monument; inset: St. Croix. SOUTH FLORIDA/CARIBBEAN NETWORK SCIENCE FEATURE 37 In a tropical marine ecosystem, coral reef the monument boundary. These additional Elkhorn decline communities live in a fragile, interdepen- habitats preserve ecological links that help Elkhorn was the dominant coral species in dent relationship and include essential, sustain the monument and its resources. wave-exposed and high-surge reef zones interconnected habitats. The 2001 expan- Another important part of the boundary throughout the Caribbean Sea before the sion of Buck Island Reef National Monu- expansion was placing a vast reef shelf 1970s (Adey and Burke 1976). Dense stands ment added coral reefs, sea grass beds, and area of elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata), of elkhorn coral formed and dominated sand communities, as well as algal plains, a major reef-building species, under the barrier reef and unique “haystack shelf edge, deep and dimly lit reefs, and management of the National Park Service features” (patch reefs that resemble hay- deep oceanic habitats not originally within (see fi g. 1). stacks) surrounding Buck Island (fi g. 2). However, in the 1970s and 1980s this spe- cies drastically declined primarily because of a bacterial syndrome called white-band disease (see sidebar) (Aronson and Precht In 2006, elkhorn coral 2001). Since then, hurricanes, bleach- was listed as threatened ing events, and outbreaks of predators under the U.S. have further decimated the populations Endangered Species Act. of elkhorn coral (see sidebar) (Bruckner 2002). In 2006, elkhorn coral was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (National Marine Fisheries Service 2006). Managers’ growing concern for elkhorn coral and the impending critical habitat designation under the recovery plan led to coral surveys in 2003–2004 (Mayor et al. 2006). Investigators determined the spatial distribution of the species (fi g. 3) and the presence of disease, predation, and wave damage. The surveys estimated that between 97,232 and 134,371 large elkhorn coral colonies (at least a meter in length or height) were present at Buck Island Reef National Monument at that time. Investigators observed white-band disease on 11–12% of elkhorn colonies of all sizes and called for increased monitoring of this species to better understand the dynamics of other stressors, such as bleaching, pre- dation, and severe storms, which can lead to its further decline (Mayor et al. 2006). Figure 2. Divers enjoy an elkhorn coral hay- stack feature at Buck Island Reef. HANK TONNEMACHER 38 PARK SCIENCE • VOLUME 25 • NUMBER 1 • SUMMER 2008 1991 to the present, explain why this event was so severe (see fi g. 4). Biologists documented changes in elkhorn coral conditions by analyzing repeat photography (fi g. 5). They preferentially photographed colonies from the planar view (i.e., from directly above) and in shallow water from a consistent oblique angle. They analyzed photos from August and November 2005 and January 2006 using the following categorical evalua- tion: live healthy tissue retained its normal brown coloration; bleached or mottled tissue was pale or white; and dead tissue had previously been alive but now was covered with algae. The change in live tissue from August 2005 to January 2006 (when bleaching was no longer evident) is Figure 3. Distribution and density of elkhorn coral colonies at Buck Island Reef National the estimated loss as a result of the bleach- Monument in 2004. PHILIPPE MAYOR ing event. Of the colonies examined, 82% Bleaching event The much higher water temperatures over a much longer period A benefi cial outgrowth of the 2003–2004 in 2005, as compared with historical records from 1991 to the monitoring was the impetus to include elk- present, explain why this [bleaching] event was so severe. horn coral monitoring as part of the vital signs monitoring program being developed at Buck Island Reef National Monument experienced bleaching, with maximum for Buck Island Reef National Monument for more than 12 weeks. Data loggers bleaching for all sites occurring in Novem- by the South Florida/Caribbean Network deployed by the National Park Service on ber 2005. Interestingly, colonies located of the National Park Service. Elkhorn coral both the forereef (33 feet [10 m] deep) and on the backreef (at a medium depth monitoring began in March 2005, just be- backreef (8 feet [2.5 m] deep) zones of the among the three habitats) were impacted fore the onset of a major bleaching event, national monument showed that problem- before colonies on the shallower forereef and focused on colonies in the three major atically high water temperatures seemed to and much deeper reef shelf (fi g. 6). More types of elkhorn habitat: forereef, backreef, be tri-phased during the bleaching event importantly, mortality was twice as high and reef shelf. Investigators monitored (fi g. 4) (Lundgren and Hillis-Starr 2008). on the backreef and forereef as on the reef sites monthly for health parameters: pres- Initially temperatures in both the forereef shelf (see fi g. 6). Mortality on the backreef ence and progression of disease, preda- and backreef habitats fl uctuated above and occurred sooner than on the forereef. The tion, bleaching, storm damage, and overall below the bleaching threshold, exceeding backreef experienced the highest average change in live tissue cover. This monitoring the threshold 61% of the time on the fore- tissue mortality during the event (66%), completely recorded the impact of the reef and 84% of the time on the backreef. followed by the forereef (58%) and the bleaching event in late 2005. By the fi rst week in August, temperatures reef shelf (36%) (fi g. 7). Overall, out of 44 had exceeded the bleaching threshold at colonies monitored, only 2 did not experi- Elkhorn coral has anecdotally been both reef habitats and remained lethal for ence any mortality during the bleaching known to be resistant to bleaching; how- 10 weeks. In the last phase, temperatures event. ever, in 2005, elkhorn reefs experienced again fl uctuated above and below the the widest-scale bleaching ever reported bleaching threshold as they had before Discussion and conclusion in the U.S. Virgin Islands. According to the August. The much higher water tempera- Though shallow elkhorn coral habitat is National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad- tures over a much longer period in 2005, present on the barrier reef and scattered ministration (NOAA), water temperatures as compared with historical records from haystack features surrounding Buck Is- in 2005 exceeded the bleaching threshold land, the majority of elkhorn coral habitat SCIENCE FEATURE 39 Figure 4.
Recommended publications
  • A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs (2019)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/25279 SHARE A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs (2019) DETAILS 258 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-48535-7 | DOI 10.17226/25279 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Interventions to Increase the Resilience of Coral Reefs; Ocean Studies Board; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25279. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs A RESEARCH REVIEW OF INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE THE PERSISTENCE AND RESILIENCE OF CORAL REEFS Committee on Interventions to Increase the Resilience of Coral Reefs Ocean Studies Board Board on Life Sciences Division on Earth and Life Studies A Consensus Study Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Kitts Final Report
    ReefFix: An Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Ecosystem Services Valuation and Capacity Building Project for the Caribbean ST. KITTS AND NEVIS FIRST DRAFT REPORT JUNE 2013 PREPARED BY PATRICK I. WILLIAMS CONSULTANT CLEVERLY HILL SANDY POINT ST. KITTS PHONE: 1 (869) 765-3988 E-MAIL: [email protected] 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Table of Contents 3 List of Figures 6 List of Tables 6 Glossary of Terms 7 Acronyms 10 Executive Summary 12 Part 1: Situational analysis 15 1.1 Introduction 15 1.2 Physical attributes 16 1.2.1 Location 16 1.2.2 Area 16 1.2.3 Physical landscape 16 1.2.4 Coastal zone management 17 1.2.5 Vulnerability of coastal transportation system 19 1.2.6 Climate 19 1.3 Socio-economic context 20 1.3.1 Population 20 1.3.2 General economy 20 1.3.3 Poverty 22 1.4 Policy frameworks of relevance to marine resource protection and management in St. Kitts and Nevis 23 1.4.1 National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) 23 1.4.2 National Physical Development Plan (2006) 23 1.4.3 National Environmental Management Strategy (NEMS) 23 1.4.4 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NABSAP) 26 1.4.5 Medium Term Economic Strategy Paper (MTESP) 26 1.5 Legislative instruments of relevance to marine protection and management in St. Kitts and Nevis 27 1.5.1 Development Control and Planning Act (DCPA), 2000 27 1.5.2 National Conservation and Environmental Protection Act (NCEPA), 1987 27 1.5.3 Public Health Act (1969) 28 1.5.4 Solid Waste Management Corporation Act (1996) 29 1.5.5 Water Courses and Water Works Ordinance (Cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure of Pleistocene Coral Reefs of Curacë Ao, Netherlands Antilles
    Ecological Monographs, 71(1), 2001, pp. 49±67 q 2001 by the Ecological Society of America COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF PLEISTOCENE CORAL REEFS OF CURACË AO, NETHERLANDS ANTILLES JOHN M. PANDOLFI1 AND JEREMY B. C. JACKSON2 Center for Tropical Paleoecology and Archeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama Abstract. The Quaternary fossil record of living coral reefs is fundamental for un- derstanding modern ecological patterns. Living reefs generally accumulate in place, so fossil reefs record a history of their former biological inhabitants and physical environments. Reef corals record their ecological history especially well because they form large, resistant skeletons, which can be identi®ed to species. Thus, presence±absence and relative abun- dance data can be obtained with a high degree of con®dence. Moreover, potential effects of humans on reef ecology were absent or insigni®cant on most reefs until the last few hundred years, so that it is possible to analyze ``natural'' distribution patterns before intense human disturbance began. We characterized Pleistocene reef coral assemblages from CuracËao, Netherlands Antil- les, Caribbean Sea, focusing on predictability in species abundance patterns from different reef environments over broad spatial scales. Our data set is composed of .2 km of surveyed Quaternary reef. Taxonomic composition showed consistent differences between environ- ments and along secondary environmental gradients within environments. Within environ- ments, taxonomic composition of communities was markedly similar, indicating nonrandom species associations and communities composed of species occurring in characteristic abun- dances. This community similarity was maintained with little change over a 40-km distance. The nonrandom patterns in species abundances were similar to those found in the Caribbean before the effects of extensive anthropogenic degradation of reefs in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhorn Coral: Science of Recovery
    Elkhorn Coral: Science of Recovery Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Once Abundant Coral Listed as Threatened Species Elkhorn coral, Acropora palmata, was once the most abundant stony coral on shallow reef crests and fore-reefs of the Caribbean and Florida reef tract. In the Florida Keys, this fast-growing coral with its thick antler-like branches formed extensive habitat for fish and marine invertebrates. By the early 1990s, elkhorn coral had experienced widespread losses throughout its range. A similar trend was seen in a close relative, staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis. Multiple factors are thought to have contributed to coral declines, including impacts from hurricanes, coral disease, mass coral bleaching, climate change, coastal pollution, overfishing, and damage from boaters and divers. In 2006, the two species were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The recovery strategy, developed by NOAA Fisheries, included designating critical habitats in Florida, Puerto Rico Coral-eating snails covered in algae feed on elkhorn coral tissue. Photo: NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Virgin Islands and called for further investigations into the factors that prevent natural recovery of the species. NOAA Scientists Investigate Causes of Coral Declines In 2004, scientists from NOAA’s Southeast Fisheries Science Center (Miami) began a long- In response to population term monitoring program in Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to determine the current declines, the Center for population status of elkhorn coral and to better understand the primary threats and stressors Biological Diversity affecting its recovery. Understanding basic population statistics (coral recruitment and petitioned NOAA mortality) and the nature of stressors is critical to the species recovery plan and management Fisheries to list elkhorn of elkhorn coral within the sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Mucus Secretion in Reef Corals
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 296: 291–309, 2005 Published July 12 Mar Ecol Prog Ser REVIEW Perspectives on mucus secretion in reef corals B. E. Brown*, J. C. Bythell School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK ABSTRACT: The coral surface mucus layer provides a vital interface between the coral epithelium and the seawater environment and mucus acts in defence against a wide range of environmental stresses, in ciliary-mucus feeding and in sediment cleansing, amongst other roles. However, we know surpris- ingly little about the in situ physical and chemical properties of the layer, or its dynamics of formation. We review the nature of coral mucus and its derivation and outline the wide array of roles that are pro- posed for mucus secretion in corals. Finally, we review models of the surface mucus layer formation. We argue that at any one time, different types of mucus secretions may be produced at different sites within the coral colony and that mucus layers secreted by the coral may not be single homogeneous layers but consist of separate layers with different properties. This requires a much more dynamic view of mucus than has been considered before and has important implications, not least for bacterial colonisation. Understanding the formation and dynamics of the surface mucus layer under different environmental conditions is critical to understanding a wide range of associated ecological processes. KEY WORDS: Mucin · Mucopolysaccharide · Coral surface microlayer · CSM · Surface mucopolysaccharide layer · SML Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION production has been a problem for many working with coral tissues in recent years, and the offending sub- The study of mucus secretion by corals has fascinated stance has to be removed before histological, biochem- scientists for almost a century, from the work of Duer- ical or physiological processing can begin.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Corals Supplemental Information Report
    Supplemental Information Report on Status Review Report And Draft Management Report For 82 Coral Candidate Species November 2012 Southeast and Pacific Islands Regional Offices National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................................................... 3 SRR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Background on Corals and Coral Reefs .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Taxonomy & Distribution .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Host Range and Large-Scale Spatial Variability in Black Band Disease Prevalence on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 69: 41–51, 2006 Published March 23 Dis Aquat Org Distribution, host range and large-scale spatial variability in black band disease prevalence on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Cathie Page*, Bette Willis School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia ABSTRACT: The prevalence and host range of black band disease (BBD) was determined from sur- veys of 19 reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia. Prevalence of BBD was com- pared among reefs distributed across large-scale cross-shelf and long-shelf gradients of terrestrial or anthropogenic influence. We found that BBD was widespread throughout the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and was present on 73.7% of the 19 reefs surveyed in 3 latitudinal sectors and 3 cross-shelf positions in the summer of 2004. Although BBD occurred on all mid-shelf reefs and all but one outer- shelf reefs, overall prevalence was low, infecting on average 0.09% of sessile cnidarians and 0.1% of scleractinian corals surveyed. BBD affected ~7% of scleractinian taxa (25 of approximately 350 GBR hard coral species) and 1 soft coral family, although most cases of BBD were recorded on branching Acropora species. Prevalence of BBD did not correlate with distance from terrestrial influences, being highest on mid-shelf reefs and lowest on inshore reefs (absent from 66%, n = 6, of these reefs). BBD prevalence was consistently higher in all shelf positions in the northern (Cooktown/Lizard Island) sector, which is adjacent to relatively pristine catchments compared to the central (Townsville) sec- tor, which is adjacent to a more developed catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Spawning Predictions for the Southern Caribbean
    Coral Spawning Predictions for the 2020 Southern Caribbean DAYS AFM 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 13 April, May, & June Corals CALENDAR DATE 17-Apr 18-Apr 19-Apr 20-Apr 17-May 18-May 19-May 20-May 15-Jun 16-Jun 17-Jun 18-Jun SUNSET TIME 18:48 18:48 18:48 18:48 18:53 18:53 18:53 18:54 19:01 19:01 19:01 19:02 Latin name Common Name Spawning Window Diploria labyrinthiformis* Grooved Brain Coral 70 min BS-10 min AS 17:40-19:00 17:45-19:05 17:50-19:10 *Monthly "DLAB" spawning has been observed from April to October in Curaçao, Bonaire, the Dominican Republic, and Mexico. We don't yet know if this occurs accross the entire region. New observations are highly encouraged! DAYS AFM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 July Corals CALENDAR DATE 4-Jul 5-Jul 6-Jul 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul 12-Jul 13-Jul 14-Jul 15-Jul 16-Jul 17-Jul SUNSET TIME 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 19:04 Latin name Common Name Spawning Window Diploria labyrinthiformis* Grooved Brain Coral 70 min BS-10 min AS 17:55-19:15 Montastraea cavernosa Great Star Coral 15-165 min AS 19:20-21:50 Colpophyllia natans Boulder Brain Coral 35-110 min AS 19:40-20:55 Pseudodiplora strigosa (Early group) Symmetrical Brain Coral 40-60 min AS 19:45-20:05 Dendrogyra cylindrus Pillar Coral 90-155 min AS 20:35-21:40 Pseudodiplora strigosa (Late group) Symmetrical Brain Coral 220-270 min AS 22:45-23:35 DAYS AFM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 August Corals CALENDAR DATE 3-Aug 4-Aug 5-Aug 6-Aug 7-Aug 8-Aug 9-Aug 10-Aug 11-Aug 12-Aug 13-Aug 14-Aug 15-Aug
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Demonstration of Assisted Gene Flow in the Threatened Coral Acropora Palmata Across Genetically-Isolated Caribbean Populations Using Cryopreserved Sperm
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/492447; this version posted December 10, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. SUCCESSFUL DEMONSTRATION OF ASSISTED GENE FLOW IN THE THREATENED CORAL ACROPORA PALMATA ACROSS GENETICALLY-ISOLATED CARIBBEAN POPULATIONS USING CRYOPRESERVED SPERM Short Title: Cryopreservation-Assisted Gene Flow in Elkhorn Coral Authors: Mary Hagedorn1,2, Christopher A. Page3, Keri O’Neil4, Daisy M. Flores5,6, Lucas Tichy5,7, Valérie F. Chamberland5,8,9, Claire Lager1,2, Nikolas Zuchowicz1,2, Kathryn Lohr10, Harvey Blackburn11, Tali Vardi12, Jennifer Moore13, Tom Moore13, Mark J. A. Vermeij5,9, and Kristen L. Marhaver5 Author Affiliations: 1 Center for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA 2 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Kaneohe, Hawaii, USA 3 Coral Restoration, Mote Marine Laboratory, Summerland Key, FL, USA 4 Conservation, The Florida Aquarium Center for Conservation, Apollo Beach, FL, USA 5 CARMABI Foundation Research Station, Piscaderabaai z/n, Willemstad, Curaçao 6 Department of Biology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 7 Department of Microbiology, Raboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 8 SECORE International, Hilliard, OH, USA 9 Freshwater and Marine Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 10 Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL, USA 11 USDA, National Animal Germplasm Program, Ft. Collins, CO, USA 12 ECS for NOAA Fisheries, Office of Science and Technology, Silver Spring, MD, USA 13 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002
    Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002 Edited by Clive Wilkinson PDF compression, OCR, web optimization using a watermarked evaluation copy of CVISION PDFCompressor Dedication This book is dedicated to all those people who are working to conserve the coral reefs of the world – we thank them for their efforts. It is also dedicated to the International Coral Reef Initiative and partners, one of which is the Government of the United States of America operating through the US Coral Reef Task Force. Of particular mention is the support to the GCRMN from the US Department of State and the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. I wish to make a special dedication to Robert (Bob) E. Johannes (1936-2002) who has spent over 40 years working on coral reefs, especially linking the scientists who research and monitor reefs with the millions of people who live on and beside these resources and often depend for their lives from them. Bob had a rare gift of understanding both sides and advocated a partnership of traditional and modern management for reef conservation. We will miss you Bob! Front cover: Vanuatu - burning of branching Acropora corals in a coral rock oven to make lime for chewing betel nut (photo by Terry Done, AIMS, see page 190). Back cover: Great Barrier Reef - diver measuring large crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci) and freshly eaten Acropora corals (photo by Peter Moran, AIMS). This report has been produced for the sole use of the party who requested it. The application or use of this report and of any data or information (including results of experiments, conclusions, and recommendations) contained within it shall be at the sole risk and responsibility of that party.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Farming and Reef Rehabilitation in Puerto Rico: Recent Progress and Major Needs
    Coral farming and reef rehabilitation in Puerto Rico: Recent progress and major needs Edwin A. Hernández-Delgado1,2,3 1UPR, Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation 2UPR, Dept. Biology, 3Sociedad Ambiente Marino [email protected] U.S. Coral Reefs Task Force Meeting Fajardo, Puerto Rico October 29, 2015 Puerto Rico National Coral Farming and Reef Rehabilitation Alliance MOA-Coop. Contract Research LOA-Coral Farming Objectives • Efforts by: – DNER – NOAA-RC and Sea Ventures – HJR ReefScaping – VIDAS – Sociedad Ambiente Marino and CATEC/UPR • Recommendations for improving coral farming and reef rehabilitation 35,000 corals were outplanted during 2014/15 from nurseries in Florida, Puerto Rico and the USVI to assist in the recovery of ESA listed coral populations and restore degraded reefs (n=14 farms PR; n=5 USVI) 35,000 corals were outplanted during 2014/15 from nurseries in Florida, Puerto Rico and the USVI to assist in the recovery of ESA listed coral populations and restore degraded reefs (n=24 PR; n=16 USVI) Cabo Rojo, Outplanting and Restoration Sites • Coordination of all coral farming and reef rehabilitation efforts in Puerto Rico Marine Protected area Belvedere • Signed 3-year LOA with coral farmers (October 14, 2014) – Operation of coral farms Legend– Establish uniform methods Belv INN Belv INN– Emergency restoration (i.e., groundings, major storm Belv Mid swells, hurricanes)Marine Protected area Belv OUT Pta. Guaniquilla Guani MID– Support DNER/NOAA operations Guani INN • Unsuccessful seeking NOAA programatic funds to support and coordinate coral farming efforts Time lapse series of stabilized Acropora palmata fragment in Vega Baja (10cm to over 1m in 6 years) 1 Year 2 Years 6 Years 3 Months Storm generated fragments of A.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Management Plan for Acropora Population Enhancement
    NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATON Management Plan for Caribbean Acropora Population Enhancement National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office December 2016 Abbreviations List µmol m-2 s-1 micromoles per square meters per second C Celsius cm2 square centimeters ESA Endangered Species Act FWS Fish and Wildlife Service GPS global positioning system km kilometers m meters mEqL-1 milliequivalent per liter mgL-1 milligrams per liter mi miles ms-1 meters per second mV millivolts NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service PAR photosynthetically active radiation ppt parts per thousand PVC polyvinyl chloride i Table of Contents Abbreviations List ........................................................................................................................................... i Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acropora Recovery Plan ............................................................................................................................ 1 Policy Regarding Controlled Propagation of Species ................................................................................ 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]