DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 219/Thursday, November 13, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 219/Thursday, November 13, 2014 67356 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations and promptly construct if authorized. Commission amends 47 CFR Part 73 as ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Substituting channel 11 for channel 21 follows: parts 217 and 219 continues to read as will further the Commission’s goal of follows: clearing UHF spectrum for new uses PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR and allow WPXS to provide improved chapter 1. service to viewers, which serves the ■ public interest. 1. The authority citation for part 73 PART 217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING continues to read as follows: DATES: This rule is effective December METHODS 15, 2014. Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, and 339. ■ 2. Revise section 217.207 to read as FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: follows: Joyce Bernstein, Joyce.Bernstein@ § 73.622 [Amended] fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418–1647. ■ 2. Section 73.622(i), the Post- 217.207 Exercise of options. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a Transition Table of DTV Allotments (c) In addition to the requirements at synopsis of the Commission’s Report under Illinois is amended by removing FAR 17.207(c), exercise an option only and Order, MB Docket No. 143–139, channel 21 and adding channel 11 at after determining that the contractor’s adopted October 30, 2014, and released Mount Vernon. record in the System for Award October 31, 2014. The full text of this [FR Doc. 2014–26796 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] Management database is active and the document is available for public BILLING CODE 6712–01–P contractor’s Data Universal Numbering inspection and copying during normal System (DUNS) number, Commercial business hours in the FCC’s Reference and Government Entity (CAGE) code, Information Center at Portals II, CY– DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE name, and physical address are A257, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, accurately reflected in the contract DC, 20554. This document will also be Defense Acquisition Regulations document. See PGI 217.207 for the available via ECFS (http:// System requirement to perform cost or price fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/). This document analysis of spare parts prior to may be purchased from the 48 CFR Parts 217 and 219 exercising any option for firm-fixed- Commission’s duplicating contractor, price contracts containing spare parts. Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Defense Federal Acquisition Street SW., Room CY–B402, Regulation Supplement; Technical PART 219—SMALL BUSINESS Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– Amendments PROGRAMS 800–478–3160 or via the company’s AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com. To 219.201 [Amended] Regulations System, Department of request materials in accessible formats ■ 3. Amend section 219.201 by Defense (DoD). for people with disabilities (braille, redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as ACTION: large print, electronic files, audio Final rule. paragraphs (c) and (d) respectively. format), send an email to [email protected] SUMMARY: DoD is making technical [FR Doc. 2014–26599 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] or call the Consumer & Governmental amendments to the Defense Federal BILLING CODE 5001–06–P Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), Acquisition Regulation Supplement 202–418–0432 (tty). (DFARS) to provide needed editorial This document does not contain changes. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act DATES: Effective November 13, 2014. Fish and Wildlife Service of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. therefore, it does not contain any Manuel Quinones, Defense Acquisition 50 CFR Part 17 information collection burden ‘‘for Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2014–0055; small business concerns with fewer than 4500030113] 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Washington, DC 20301–3060. RIN 1018–BA63 Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. Telephone 571–372–6088; facsimile Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 571–372–6094. and Plants; Adding 20 Coral Species to Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the List of Endangered and Threatened this proceeding. This final rule amends the DFARS as The Commission will send a copy of follows: Wildlife this Report and Order in a report to be 1. Directs contracting officers to AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, sent to Congress and the Government additional procedures and guidance by Interior. adding references at 217.207 to DFARS Accountability Office pursuant to the ACTION: Final rule. Congressional review Act, see 5 U.S.C. PGI 217.207. 801(a)(1)(A). 2. Corrects paragraph designation at SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 219.201. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Wildlife Service (Service), in List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 217 and accordance with the Endangered Television. 219 Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), are amending the List of Endangered Federal Communications Commission. Government procurement. Barbara A. Kreisman, and Threatened Wildlife (List) by Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Manuel Quinones, adding 20 species of corals: Boulder star Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations coral (Orbicella franksi), lobed star coral Final Rule System. (Orbicella annularis), mountainous star For the reasons discussed in the Therefore, 48 CFR parts 217 and 219 coral (Orbicella faveolata), pillar coral preamble, the Federal Communications are amended as follows: (Dendrogyra cylindrus), rough cactus VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:19 Nov 12, 2014 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM 13NOR1 rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 67357 coral (Mycetophyllia ferox), Acropora palmata) and staghorn coral (Acropora to the List of Endangered and globiceps, Acropora jacquelineae, cervicornis)) already listed under the Threatened Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11(h). Acropora lokani, Acropora pharaonis, Act. NMFS solicited public comments The public would not be served by Acropora retusa, Acropora rudis, on the proposed rule through March 7, delaying the effective date of this Acropora speciosa, Acropora tenella, 2013. On September 20, 2013, NMFS rulemaking action. Anacropora spinosa, Euphyllia published a notice of 6-month extension Required Determinations paradivisa, Isopora crateriformis, of the deadline for the final coral Montipora australiensis, Pavona species’ determinations because of National Environmental Policy Act substantial disagreement regarding the diffluens, Porites napopora, and We have determined that an sufficiency and accuracy of the data and Seriatopora aculeata. These environmental assessment, as defined analyses relevant to the proposed listing amendments are based on previously under the authority of the National determinations (78 FR 57835). published determinations by the Environmental Policy Act of 1969, need National Marine Fisheries Service On September 10, 2014, NMFS published a final rule (79 FR 53852) to not be prepared in connection with (NMFS) of the National Oceanic and regulations adopted pursuant to section Atmospheric Administration, list 20 of the 66 proposed coral species as threatened species. The listing of the 4(a) of the Act. We outlined our reasons Department of Commerce, which has for this determination in the Federal jurisdiction for these species. 20 species was effective October 10, 2014. In that same rule, NMFS also Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR DATES: This rule is effective November 49244). 13, 2014. Applicability date: The 20 determined that elkhorn coral and coral listings were applicable as of staghorn coral did not warrant List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 October 10, 2014. reclassification from threatened to endangered. However, we revise the Endangered and threatened species, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: elkhorn coral and staghorn coral listings Exports, Imports, Reporting and Douglas Krofta, Chief, Branch of in this rule to make the information in recordkeeping requirements, Endangered Species Listing, U.S. Fish the Historic Range column consistent Transportation. and Wildlife Service, MS–ES, 5275 with the other coral entries; the listing Regulation Promulgation Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– status of threatened remains unchanged 3803; 703–358–2171. for these two species. Accordingly, we amend part 17, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the September 10, 2014, final rule subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth Background (79 FR 53852), NMFS addressed all public comments received in response below: In accordance with the Act (16 U.S.C. to the proposed rule. By publishing this PART 17—[AMENDED] 1531 et seq.) and Reorganization Plan final rule, we are simply taking the No. 4 of 1970 (35 FR 15627; October 6, necessary administrative step to codify ■ 1970), NMFS has jurisdiction over the 1. The authority citation for part 17 these changes in the List in 50 CFR continues to read as follows: marine and anadromous taxa identified 17.11(h). in this rule. Under section 4(a)(2) of the Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– Act, NMFS must decide whether a Administrative Procedure Act 1544; 4201–4245, unless otherwise noted. species under its jurisdiction should be Because NMFS provided a public ■ 2. Amend § 17.11(h) under Corals by: classified as an endangered or comment period on the proposed rules ■ a. Revising the entries for ‘‘Coral, threatened species. NMFS makes these for these taxa, and because this action elkhorn’’ and ‘‘Coral, staghorn’’ to read determinations via its rulemaking of the Service to amend the List in as set forth below; and process. We, the Service, are then accordance with the determination by ■ b. Adding 20 entries in alphabetical responsible for publishing final rules to NMFS is nondiscretionary, the Service order for: ‘‘Coral, [no common name]’’ amend the List in title 50 of the Code finds good cause that the notice and (15 entries); ‘‘Coral, boulder star’’; of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR public comment procedures of 5 U.S.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs (2019)
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/25279 SHARE A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs (2019) DETAILS 258 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-48535-7 | DOI 10.17226/25279 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Interventions to Increase the Resilience of Coral Reefs; Ocean Studies Board; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25279. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. A Research Review of Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience of Coral Reefs A RESEARCH REVIEW OF INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE THE PERSISTENCE AND RESILIENCE OF CORAL REEFS Committee on Interventions to Increase the Resilience of Coral Reefs Ocean Studies Board Board on Life Sciences Division on Earth and Life Studies A Consensus Study Report of Copyright National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities
    DRAFT Implementation of the Turbidity Criterion for the Protection of Coral Reef and Hardbottom Communities Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection October 2020 Contents Section 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Document .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Information ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Criterion and Rule Language .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations .......................................................................... 5 1.5 Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) Considerations ........................................................................... 5 1.6 Natural Factors Influencing Background Turbidity Levels ................................................................ 7 Section 2. Implementation in Permitting ..................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Permitting Information ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Establishing Baseline (Pre-project) Levels ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St. Kitts Final Report
    ReefFix: An Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Ecosystem Services Valuation and Capacity Building Project for the Caribbean ST. KITTS AND NEVIS FIRST DRAFT REPORT JUNE 2013 PREPARED BY PATRICK I. WILLIAMS CONSULTANT CLEVERLY HILL SANDY POINT ST. KITTS PHONE: 1 (869) 765-3988 E-MAIL: [email protected] 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Table of Contents 3 List of Figures 6 List of Tables 6 Glossary of Terms 7 Acronyms 10 Executive Summary 12 Part 1: Situational analysis 15 1.1 Introduction 15 1.2 Physical attributes 16 1.2.1 Location 16 1.2.2 Area 16 1.2.3 Physical landscape 16 1.2.4 Coastal zone management 17 1.2.5 Vulnerability of coastal transportation system 19 1.2.6 Climate 19 1.3 Socio-economic context 20 1.3.1 Population 20 1.3.2 General economy 20 1.3.3 Poverty 22 1.4 Policy frameworks of relevance to marine resource protection and management in St. Kitts and Nevis 23 1.4.1 National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) 23 1.4.2 National Physical Development Plan (2006) 23 1.4.3 National Environmental Management Strategy (NEMS) 23 1.4.4 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NABSAP) 26 1.4.5 Medium Term Economic Strategy Paper (MTESP) 26 1.5 Legislative instruments of relevance to marine protection and management in St. Kitts and Nevis 27 1.5.1 Development Control and Planning Act (DCPA), 2000 27 1.5.2 National Conservation and Environmental Protection Act (NCEPA), 1987 27 1.5.3 Public Health Act (1969) 28 1.5.4 Solid Waste Management Corporation Act (1996) 29 1.5.5 Water Courses and Water Works Ordinance (Cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENDED COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS of PRESENT and FUTURE USE of INDONESIAN CORAL REEFS an Empirical Approach to Sustainable Management of Tropical Marine Resources
    Aus dem Institut für Agrarökonomie der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel EXTENDED COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF INDONESIAN CORAL REEFS An Empirical Approach to Sustainable Management of Tropical Marine Resources Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Agrar-und Ernährungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Magister of Science Achmad Fahrudin aus Jakarta (Indonesien) Kiel, November 2003 Dekan : Prof. Dr. Friedhelm Taube Erster Berichterstatter : Prof. Dr. Christian Noell Zweiter Berichterstatter : Prof. Dr. Franciscus Colijn Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 06.11.2003 i Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Agrar- und Ernährungswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel ii Zusammenfassung Korallen stellen einen wichtigen Faktor der indonesischen Wirtschaft dar. Im Vergleich zu anderen Ländern weisen die Korallenriffe Indonesiens die höchsten Schädigungen auf. Das zerstörende Fischen ist ein Hauptgrund für die Degradation der Korallenriffe in Indonesien, so dass das Gesamtsystem dieser Fangpraxis analysiert werden muss. Dazu wurden im Rahmen dieser Studie die Standortbedingungen der Korallen erfasst, die Hauptnutzungen mit ihren jeweiligen Auswirkungen und typischen Merkmale der Nutzungen bestimmt sowie die politische Haltung der gegenwärtigen Regierung gegenüber diesem Problemfeld untersucht. Die Feldarbeit wurde in der Zeit von März 2001 bis März 2002 an den Korallenstandorten Seribu Islands (Jakarta), Menjangan Island (Bali) und Gili Islands
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Identification of Precious and Semi-Precious Corals in Commercial Trade
    'l'llA FFIC YvALE ,.._,..---...- guide to the identification of precious and semi-precious corals in commercial trade Ernest W.T. Cooper, Susan J. Torntore, Angela S.M. Leung, Tanya Shadbolt and Carolyn Dawe September 2011 © 2011 World Wildlife Fund and TRAFFIC. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-9693730-3-2 Reproduction and distribution for resale by any means photographic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping or information storage and retrieval systems of any parts of this book, illustrations or texts is prohibited without prior written consent from World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Reproduction for CITES enforcement or educational and other non-commercial purposes by CITES Authorities and the CITES Secretariat is authorized without prior written permission, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit WWF and TRAFFIC North America. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF, or the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF, TRAFFIC, or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Cooper, E.W.T., Torntore, S.J., Leung, A.S.M, Shadbolt, T. and Dawe, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure of Pleistocene Coral Reefs of Curacë Ao, Netherlands Antilles
    Ecological Monographs, 71(1), 2001, pp. 49±67 q 2001 by the Ecological Society of America COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF PLEISTOCENE CORAL REEFS OF CURACË AO, NETHERLANDS ANTILLES JOHN M. PANDOLFI1 AND JEREMY B. C. JACKSON2 Center for Tropical Paleoecology and Archeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama Abstract. The Quaternary fossil record of living coral reefs is fundamental for un- derstanding modern ecological patterns. Living reefs generally accumulate in place, so fossil reefs record a history of their former biological inhabitants and physical environments. Reef corals record their ecological history especially well because they form large, resistant skeletons, which can be identi®ed to species. Thus, presence±absence and relative abun- dance data can be obtained with a high degree of con®dence. Moreover, potential effects of humans on reef ecology were absent or insigni®cant on most reefs until the last few hundred years, so that it is possible to analyze ``natural'' distribution patterns before intense human disturbance began. We characterized Pleistocene reef coral assemblages from CuracËao, Netherlands Antil- les, Caribbean Sea, focusing on predictability in species abundance patterns from different reef environments over broad spatial scales. Our data set is composed of .2 km of surveyed Quaternary reef. Taxonomic composition showed consistent differences between environ- ments and along secondary environmental gradients within environments. Within environ- ments, taxonomic composition of communities was markedly similar, indicating nonrandom species associations and communities composed of species occurring in characteristic abun- dances. This community similarity was maintained with little change over a 40-km distance. The nonrandom patterns in species abundances were similar to those found in the Caribbean before the effects of extensive anthropogenic degradation of reefs in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Two Intervention Methods for Stony Coral
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Assessing the efectiveness of two intervention methods for stony coral tissue loss disease on Montastraea cavernosa Erin N. Shilling 1*, Ian R. Combs 1,2 & Joshua D. Voss 1* Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) was frst observed in Florida in 2014 and has since spread to multiple coral reefs across the wider Caribbean. The northern section of Florida’s Coral Reef has been heavily impacted by this outbreak, with some reefs experiencing as much as a 60% loss of living coral tissue area. We experimentally assessed the efectiveness of two intervention treatments on SCTLD-afected Montastraea cavernosa colonies in situ. Colonies were tagged and divided into three treatment groups: (1) chlorinated epoxy, (2) amoxicillin combined with CoreRx/Ocean Alchemists Base 2B, and (3) untreated controls. The experimental colonies were monitored periodically over 11 months to assess treatment efectiveness by tracking lesion development and overall disease status. The Base 2B plus amoxicillin treatment had a 95% success rate at healing individual disease lesions but did not necessarily prevent treated colonies from developing new lesions over time. Chlorinated epoxy treatments were not signifcantly diferent from untreated control colonies, suggesting that chlorinated epoxy treatments are an inefective intervention technique for SCTLD. The results of this experiment expand management options during coral disease outbreaks and contribute to overall knowledge regarding coral health and disease. Coral reefs face many threats, including, but not limited to, warming ocean temperatures, overfshing, increased nutrient and plastic pollution, hurricanes, ocean acidifcation, and disease outbreaks 1–6. Coral diseases are com- plex, involving both pathogenic agents and coral immune responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhorn Coral: Science of Recovery
    Elkhorn Coral: Science of Recovery Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Once Abundant Coral Listed as Threatened Species Elkhorn coral, Acropora palmata, was once the most abundant stony coral on shallow reef crests and fore-reefs of the Caribbean and Florida reef tract. In the Florida Keys, this fast-growing coral with its thick antler-like branches formed extensive habitat for fish and marine invertebrates. By the early 1990s, elkhorn coral had experienced widespread losses throughout its range. A similar trend was seen in a close relative, staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis. Multiple factors are thought to have contributed to coral declines, including impacts from hurricanes, coral disease, mass coral bleaching, climate change, coastal pollution, overfishing, and damage from boaters and divers. In 2006, the two species were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The recovery strategy, developed by NOAA Fisheries, included designating critical habitats in Florida, Puerto Rico Coral-eating snails covered in algae feed on elkhorn coral tissue. Photo: NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Virgin Islands and called for further investigations into the factors that prevent natural recovery of the species. NOAA Scientists Investigate Causes of Coral Declines In 2004, scientists from NOAA’s Southeast Fisheries Science Center (Miami) began a long- In response to population term monitoring program in Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to determine the current declines, the Center for population status of elkhorn coral and to better understand the primary threats and stressors Biological Diversity affecting its recovery. Understanding basic population statistics (coral recruitment and petitioned NOAA mortality) and the nature of stressors is critical to the species recovery plan and management Fisheries to list elkhorn of elkhorn coral within the sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Mucus Secretion in Reef Corals
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 296: 291–309, 2005 Published July 12 Mar Ecol Prog Ser REVIEW Perspectives on mucus secretion in reef corals B. E. Brown*, J. C. Bythell School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK ABSTRACT: The coral surface mucus layer provides a vital interface between the coral epithelium and the seawater environment and mucus acts in defence against a wide range of environmental stresses, in ciliary-mucus feeding and in sediment cleansing, amongst other roles. However, we know surpris- ingly little about the in situ physical and chemical properties of the layer, or its dynamics of formation. We review the nature of coral mucus and its derivation and outline the wide array of roles that are pro- posed for mucus secretion in corals. Finally, we review models of the surface mucus layer formation. We argue that at any one time, different types of mucus secretions may be produced at different sites within the coral colony and that mucus layers secreted by the coral may not be single homogeneous layers but consist of separate layers with different properties. This requires a much more dynamic view of mucus than has been considered before and has important implications, not least for bacterial colonisation. Understanding the formation and dynamics of the surface mucus layer under different environmental conditions is critical to understanding a wide range of associated ecological processes. KEY WORDS: Mucin · Mucopolysaccharide · Coral surface microlayer · CSM · Surface mucopolysaccharide layer · SML Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION production has been a problem for many working with coral tissues in recent years, and the offending sub- The study of mucus secretion by corals has fascinated stance has to be removed before histological, biochem- scientists for almost a century, from the work of Duer- ical or physiological processing can begin.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Corals Supplemental Information Report
    Supplemental Information Report on Status Review Report And Draft Management Report For 82 Coral Candidate Species November 2012 Southeast and Pacific Islands Regional Offices National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................................................... 3 SRR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Background on Corals and Coral Reefs .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Taxonomy & Distribution .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Host Range and Large-Scale Spatial Variability in Black Band Disease Prevalence on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 69: 41–51, 2006 Published March 23 Dis Aquat Org Distribution, host range and large-scale spatial variability in black band disease prevalence on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia Cathie Page*, Bette Willis School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia ABSTRACT: The prevalence and host range of black band disease (BBD) was determined from sur- veys of 19 reefs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia. Prevalence of BBD was com- pared among reefs distributed across large-scale cross-shelf and long-shelf gradients of terrestrial or anthropogenic influence. We found that BBD was widespread throughout the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and was present on 73.7% of the 19 reefs surveyed in 3 latitudinal sectors and 3 cross-shelf positions in the summer of 2004. Although BBD occurred on all mid-shelf reefs and all but one outer- shelf reefs, overall prevalence was low, infecting on average 0.09% of sessile cnidarians and 0.1% of scleractinian corals surveyed. BBD affected ~7% of scleractinian taxa (25 of approximately 350 GBR hard coral species) and 1 soft coral family, although most cases of BBD were recorded on branching Acropora species. Prevalence of BBD did not correlate with distance from terrestrial influences, being highest on mid-shelf reefs and lowest on inshore reefs (absent from 66%, n = 6, of these reefs). BBD prevalence was consistently higher in all shelf positions in the northern (Cooktown/Lizard Island) sector, which is adjacent to relatively pristine catchments compared to the central (Townsville) sec- tor, which is adjacent to a more developed catchment.
    [Show full text]