420 Chapter 10. PINTER: the Lover in the World of Pinter Role Playing And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
420 Chapter 10. PINTER: The Lover In the world of Pinter role playing and games form as intrinsic a part of the basic matrix as do the auras of dread, anxiety and insecurity that have come to be recognized as hallmarks of his work. In an opinion offered in 1969, Samuel Selden named Pirandello as the ultimate master of plays that are "puzzles", "games within games" but Pinter, according to him, is "fast catching up with him".i All Pinter's characters have masks, says Peter Hall.^ Katherine Worth points out that "he uses false voices and phoney performances" to suggest a "terrible sense of non-identit}^ in the way that O'Neill used masks.3 Characters like Richard and Sarah (in The Lover) change their clothes and their behaviour when they take on an alternate identity. Otherwise, language is the ruse frequently used by Pinter's creations to mask their real selves. Wesker's Ronnie may have spoken of words as bridges'* but, in Pinter's world, they are more like "barbs to protect the wired enclosure of the self 5. Talk of "the failure of communication" in the twentieth century has become a cant phrase that Pinter would rather not subscribe to. For him the issue is rather one of "a deliberate evasion of communication",^ a determined masking of real feelings and thoughts. "In my own work, I've always been aware that my characters tend to use words not to ' Samuel Selden, Theatre Double Game (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1969) 77. 2 Peter Hall, "Directing Pinter", Harold Pinter: The Birthday Party". The Caretaker", and The Homecoming" , ed. Michael Scott (London: Macmillan, 1986) 51. 3 Katherine Worth, "Pinter and the Realist Tradition", Harold Pinter: The Birthday Party". The Caretaker" and The Homecoming", ed. Michael Scott 37. "• Arnold Wesker, "Roots", The Wesker Trilogy 2"d. ed. (1960; Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1970) 90. 5 Guido Almansi and Simon Henderson, Harold Pinter (London: Methuen, 1983) 11. 6 Harold Pinter in an interview with Kenneth Tynan in 1960 on BBC radio. Quoted by Michael Billington, The Life and Work of Pinter (London: Faber and Faber, 1996) 124. 421 express what they think or feel but to disguise what they think or feel, to mask their own intentions, so that the words are acting as a masquerade, a veil, a web, or used as weapons to undermine or to terrorize. But these modes of operation are hardly confined to characters in plays..."^ His characters are completely "untrustworthy" since they are even seen to be lying during the course of the action. Their grunts and silences (like those of Davies in The Caretaker) do not primarily imply the inability to find words but the disinclination to communicate honestly. They feel safer behind a veil of misinformation. "I think we communicate only too well, in our silence, in what is unsaid, and that what takes place is continual evasion, desperate rearguard attempts to keep ourselves to ourselves. Communication is too alarming. To enter into someone else's life is too frightening, to disclose to others the poverty within us is too fearsome a possibility."« Even the rare and unusual long speeches (such as Lenny's stories about his dealings with women in the past or Mick's random ramblings and reminiscences to Davies) do not indicate a sincere opening-up. They are just as likely to be full of inventions and untruths, whether spontaneous or pre planned. As Pinter has said himself, "People fall back on anything they can lay their hands on verbally to keep away from the danger of knowing, and of being known." And again, "It isn't necessary to conclude that everything Aston says about his experiences in the mental hospital is true."'' Guido Almansi, in his article "Harold Pinter's Idiom of Lies", is convinced that "Pinter's idiom is essentially human because it is an idiom of lies." His characters are elusive 7 Harold Pinter. Quoted by Michael BiUington, The Life and Work of Harold Pinter 371. 8 Pinter in the Sunday Times (London), 3 March 1962. 9 Harold Pinter in an interview with Lawrence Bensky reproduced in Pinter: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Arthur Ganz (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972) 28. 422 creatures with shifting strategies who "move forward like knights on a chess board", "crab-like", or "dribble" with "oblique" progression to their goals. "The Pinterian hero lies as he breathes: consistently and uncompromisingly. Not to lie is as inconceivable to him as to 'eat a crocodile' or make love to a spider. Goldberg, Mick, Edward, Lenny, Spooner, are not just occasionally unreliable: they are untrustworthy by definition, since their words only bear witness to their capacity for speech, not to their past or present experience. Pinter's opus, like Pirandello's, is a long disquisition on the masks of the liar." 10 In The Dwarfs. Len, in the famous climactic speech, poses the question, "Who are you?"ii, just as Pirandello's Father had asked in Six Characters. Many a time the audience is left guessing to the very end. The characters can spout "words" 12 but these are as likely to be screens to hide behind as facsimiles of the truth. Bill Naismith concedes a certain "psychologic" in the way Pinter's characters speak and behave but it is often not immediately obvious. 13 Elizabeth Sakellaridou reports Pinter's confession (in 1980) of his fascination with "entering into another man's mind". She goes so far as to call this the "pivotal centre" of his enterprise, i'* The question of individual identity and the various roles taken by a person often gains the stature of an important focus of enquiry in his plays. The social intercourse the characters are involved in is invariably presented as a game. Simon Trussler even defines the characters of The Collection as a "collection" or "a set of pieces in the game that is 1° Guido Almansi, 'Harold Pinter's Idiom of Lies", Contemporary English Drama, ed. C.W.E. Bigsby (London: Edward Arnold, 1981) 79, 80, 82-83. 11 Harold Pinter, The Dwarfs", Plavs: Two (London: Eyre Methuen, 1977) 111. 12 Luigi F*irandello, Six Characters in Search of an Author, trans. Mark Musa (London: Penguin, 1995) 19. '•3 Bill Naismith, Harold Pinter (London: Faber & Faber, 2000) 8. I'' Elizabeth Sakellaridou, Pinter's Female Portraits: A Study of Female Characters in the Plavs of Harold Pinter (London: Macmillan, 1988) 4. 423 to be enacted".!^ Thus the game is synonymous with the action of the play. Time and again his characters also engage in power play. All positions and status are perceived as temporary and relative. Often an important part of the development in the action of a play is the change in the power positions of the characters. This is amply illustrated by the action in The Homecoming. Pinter is typically reticent in his description of his dramatis personae. All he gives his actors/audience/director is the bare indication of age and gender. In The Homecoming, for instance, Teddy is "a man in his middle thirties" and Ruth is "a woman in her early thirties". We are not even told that they are married (to each other) nor their relationship to the rest of the characters, all of whom actually belong to one family. In his first play. The Room, the female protagonist is Rose but, oddly, she is called Sal by an unexplained character called Riley. She does not appear to recognize him but he brings a message asking her to "come home". She begs him not to call her Sal - "Don't call me that." - but does not disown the name.i*^ In The Lover only the names of the three characters are listed. The opening conversation of the play is one that pointedly calls into question the marital status of Sarah and Richard, the two characters, yet it is only after more than half the action of the play is over that we learn that they have been married for ten years. When Richard cites "the children" as a valid reason for ending their affair, Sarah's response is "What children?", thus leaving it unresolved whether the two do actually have children or whether they are merely Richard's invention for the sake of argument during their little play within the larger play.'^ On the other hand, the milkman, who pops in briefly to J3 Simon Trussler, The Plays of Harold Pinter: An Assessment (London: Victor Gollancz, 1973) 106. "5 Harold Pinter, The Room and The Dumb Waiter (1960; London: Eyre Methuen, 1973) 30. 1^ Harold Pinter, "The Lover", The Collection and The Lover (1963; rpt. London: Methuen, 1968) 71. All subsequent references to this text are to this edition. Further references are indicated by page numbers given in parentheses. 424 deliver the daily pint, is blandly listed as John. Any other playwright would have described him as "the milkman" since he has no significant role in the action. Pinter is invariably enigmatic, even inscrutable, in his presentation of characters and situation. It is typical of his style to keep a degree of uncertainty regarding the identity of his characters and also their relationships with each other. Answering his critics who seek "the truth", Pinter has said. The desire for verification is understandable but cannot always be satisfied. There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, nor between what is true and what is false: it can be both true and false. The assumption that to verify what has happened and what is happening presents few problems 1 take to be inaccurate.