DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: a Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: a Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014 Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: A Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014 Oil Sands Research and Information Network School of Energy and the Environment University of Alberta December 2014 Oil Sands Research and Information Network The Oil Sands Research and Information Network (OSRIN) is a university-based, independent organization that compiles, interprets and analyses available knowledge about managing the environmental impacts to landscapes and water affected by oil sands mining and gets that knowledge into the hands of those who can use it to drive breakthrough improvements in regulations and practices. OSRIN is a project of the University of Alberta’s School of Energy and the Environment (SEE). OSRIN was launched with a start-up grant of $4.5 million from Alberta Environment and a $250,000 grant from the Canada School of Energy and Environment Ltd. OSRIN provides: Governments with the independent, objective, and credible information and analysis required to put appropriate regulatory and policy frameworks in place Media, opinion leaders and the general public with the facts about oil sands development, its environmental and social impacts, and landscape/water reclamation activities – so that public dialogue and policy is informed by solid evidence Industry with ready access to an integrated view of research that will help them make and execute environmental management plans – a view that crosses disciplines and organizational boundaries OSRIN recognizes that much research has been done in these areas by a variety of players over 40 years of oil sands development. OSRIN synthesizes this collective knowledge and presents it in a form that allows others to use it to solve pressing problems. Citation This report may be cited as: OSRIN, 2014. Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: A Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014. Oil Sands Research and Information Network, University of Alberta, School of Energy and the Environment, Edmonton, Alberta. OSRIN Report No. SR-12. 140 pp. Copies of this report may be obtained from OSRIN at [email protected] or through the OSRIN website at http://www.osrin.ualberta.ca/en/OSRINPublications.aspx or directly from the University of Alberta’s Education & Research Archive at http://hdl.handle.net/10402/era.17507. i Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... xvii REPORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................... xviii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... xix 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Structure of this Report ............................................................................................2 1.2 Some Observations on the Content ..........................................................................2 1.3 Links ........................................................................................................................3 2 PIPELINES GENERAL ......................................................................................................3 2.1 2011 News – General ...............................................................................................4 2.1.1 January .........................................................................................................4 2.1.2 March ...........................................................................................................4 2.1.3 August ..........................................................................................................4 2.1.4 September ....................................................................................................4 2.1.5 October .........................................................................................................4 2.1.6 November .....................................................................................................4 2.1.7 December .....................................................................................................5 2.2 2012 News – General ...............................................................................................5 2.2.1 January .........................................................................................................5 2.2.2 February .......................................................................................................6 2.2.3 March ...........................................................................................................6 2.2.4 April .............................................................................................................6 2.2.5 May ..............................................................................................................6 2.2.6 June ..............................................................................................................6 2.2.7 August ..........................................................................................................6 2.2.8 September ....................................................................................................7 2.2.9 October .........................................................................................................7 2.2.10 November ...................................................................................................7 2.2.11 December ...................................................................................................7 ii 2.3 2013 News – General ...............................................................................................7 2.3.1 January .........................................................................................................7 2.3.2 February .......................................................................................................8 2.3.3 March ...........................................................................................................8 2.3.4 April .............................................................................................................8 2.3.5 May ..............................................................................................................8 2.3.6 June ..............................................................................................................9 2.3.7 July ...............................................................................................................9 2.3.8 August ..........................................................................................................9 2.3.9 October .........................................................................................................9 2.3.10 November ...................................................................................................9 2.3.11 December .................................................................................................10 2.4 2014 News – General .............................................................................................10 2.4.1 January .......................................................................................................10 2.4.2 April ...........................................................................................................10 2.4.3 May ............................................................................................................10 2.4.4 June ............................................................................................................10 2.4.5 August ........................................................................................................11 2.4.6 October .......................................................................................................11 2.4.7 November ...................................................................................................11 2.4.8 December ...................................................................................................11 3 ALBERTA PIPELINES.....................................................................................................11 3.1 2011 News – Alberta Pipelines ..............................................................................11 3.1.1 September ..................................................................................................11 3.2 2012 News – Alberta Pipelines ..............................................................................11 3.2.1 January .......................................................................................................11 3.2.2 April ...........................................................................................................12 3.2.3 July .............................................................................................................12 3.2.4 August ........................................................................................................12 3.2.5 September ..................................................................................................12 iii 3.2.6 October .......................................................................................................12 3.2.7 November ...................................................................................................12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vital Rates, Limiting Factors and Monitoring Methods for Moose in Montana
    Vital rates, limiting factors and monitoring methods for moose in Montana Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Grant W-157-R-6 Annual report, September 1, 2018 Nick DeCesare Jesse Newby Research Wildlife Biologist, MFWP Research Technician, MFWP 3201 Spurgin Rd.│Missoula, MT 59804 490 N. Meridian │Kalispell, MT 59901 406-542-5558 │ [email protected] 406-751-4588 │[email protected] State: Montana FUNDING PARTNERS: Agency: Fish, Wildlife & Parks Safari Club International Foundation: Grant: Montana Shiras Moose Study Conservation Grant, FYs 2016–2019 Grant number: W-157-R-6 Time period: 1 July, 2017 – 30 June, 2018 Note: All results should be considered preliminary and subject to change; please contact the authors before citing or referencing these data. 1 | P a g e Background and summary Concern has arisen in recent years over widespread declines of North American moose (Alces alces) populations along the southern extent of their range. Populations in Montana appear to have declined since the 1990’s, as evidenced by aerial survey trends and hunter harvest statistics. While declining populations have clear implications for hunting opportunity, moose management in Montana also suffers from a lack of rigorous data and methods with which to monitor population trends and prescribe actions. In 2013, Montana Fish, Wildlife, & Parks (MFWP) began a 10-year study designed to improve our understanding of: 1) cost-effective means to monitor statewide moose populations, and 2) the current status and trends of moose populations and the relative importance of factors influencing moose vital rates and limiting population growth (including predators, parasites, habitat, and weather). We are using a mechanistic approach to hierarchically assess which factors are drivers of moose vital rates (e.g., adult survival, pregnancy, calf survival), and ultimately which factors are most important to annual growth of moose populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom
    30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom Katrin Horn When the sitcom 30 Rock first aired in 2006 on NBC, the odds were against a renewal for a second season. Not only was it pitched against another new show with the same “behind the scenes”-idea, namely the drama series Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 30 Rock’s often absurd storylines, obscure references, quick- witted dialogues, and fast-paced punch lines furthermore did not make for easy consumption, and thus the show failed to attract a sizeable amount of viewers. While Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip did not become an instant success either, it still did comparatively well in the Nielson ratings and had the additional advantage of being a drama series produced by a household name, Aaron Sorkin1 of The West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006) fame, at a time when high-quality prime-time drama shows were dominating fan and critical debates about TV. Still, in a rather surprising programming decision NBC cancelled the drama series, renewed the comedy instead and later incorporated 30 Rock into its Thursday night line-up2 called “Comedy Night Done Right.”3 Here the show has been aired between other single-camera-comedy shows which, like 30 Rock, 1 | Aaron Sorkin has aEntwurf short cameo in “Plan B” (S5E18), in which he meets Liz Lemon as they both apply for the same writing job: Liz: Do I know you? Aaron: You know my work. Walk with me. I’m Aaron Sorkin. The West Wing, A Few Good Men, The Social Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • Tell Cookie Tree Recipes in Book It's Showdown Time for Cass City And
    SECTION ONE SECTION ONE Pages 1 to 8 Pages 1 to 8 THIS ISSUE THIS ISSUE VOLUME 53, NUMBER 29 • ITY. MICHIGAN THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1959 TWELVE PAGES Available Locally 50 Hear Souder Hospital One-Third Tell Cookie Tree Speak at Lions Ladies' Night Completed-Hudson Recipes in Book Work on the new Cass City JL Community hospital is about a Many area residents will recall An estimated 50 Lions and their third completed, Oran Hudson, when an article telling of the un- wives were entertained Monday hospital administrator, an- From the iisual Christmas cookie tree of 1 night at Bush's Restaurant by nounced this week. Mrs. Louis LaGorce, mother of Paul Souder, vice-president of The mechanical and plumbing Drive-to Start Mrs. H. 0. Paul of Cass City, ap- the Michigan National Bank in work is about 40 per cent com- ditor's Corner peared in the National Geographic S'aginaw. pleted. The general contractor E magazine ... it was this article Mr. Souder, a delegate to Rus- estimates that about 32 per cent Today in County that touched off a wave of in- sia in connection with the foreign of his work is done and the elec- It was a quiet Halloween in terest in the project that has re- Cass City Saturday. Chief Bill exchange banking program spon- trical work is about 17 per cent sulted in a book about the pYoject sored by the government, showed Wood reports not one case of that was to have been released completed. The work of the ar- The annual Christian 'Rural vandalism in the community and this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Guide Essentials
    TM Optik TV Channel Guide Essentials Fort Grande Medicine Vancouver / Kelowna / Prince Dawson Victoria / Campbell Essential Channels Call Sign Edmonton Lloydminster Red Deer Calgary Lethbridge Kamloops Quesnel Cranbrook McMurray Prairie Hat Whistler Vernon George Creek Nanaimo River ABC Seattle KOMODT 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 AMI-audio* AMIPAUDIO 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 AMI-télé* AMITL 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 AMI-tv* AMIW 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 APTN (West)* ATPNP 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 — APTN HD* APTNHD 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 — BC Legislative TV* BCLEG — — — — — — — — 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 CBC Calgary* CBRTDT 100 100 100 CBC Edmonton* CBXTDT 100 100 — 100 100 CBC Lloydminster* CKSADT — — 100 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CBC News Network CBNEWHD 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 CBC Vancouver* CBUTDT 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 CBS Seattle KIRODT 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 CFJC* CFJCDT — — — — — — — — — 115 106 — — — — — — CHAT* CHATDT — — — — — — — 122 — — — — — — — — — CHEK* CHEKDT — — — — — — — — 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 City Calgary* CKALDT 106 106 106 — City Edmonton* CKEMDT 106 106 106 106 106 — City Vancouver* CKVUDT 106 106 — 106 106 106
    [Show full text]
  • EDITORIAL Screenwriters James Schamus, Michael France and John Turman CA 90049 (310) 447-2080 Were Thinking Is Unclear
    screenwritersmonthly.com | Screenwriter’s Monthly Give ‘em some credit! Johnny Depp's performance as Captain Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl is amazing. As film critic after film critic stumbled over Screenwriter’s Monthly can be found themselves to call his performance everything from "original" to at the following fine locations: "eccentric," they forgot one thing: the screenwriters, Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio, who did one heck of a job creating Sparrow on paper first. Sure, some critics mentioned the writers when they declared the film "cliché" and attacked it. Since the previous Walt Disney Los Angeles film based on one of its theme park attractions was the unbear- able The Country Bears, Pirates of the Caribbean is surprisingly Above The Fold 370 N. Fairfax Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90036 entertaining. But let’s face it. This wasn't intended to be serious (323) 935-8525 filmmaking. Not much is anymore in Hollywood. Recently the USA Today ran an article asking, basically, “What’s wrong with Hollywood?” Blockbusters are failing because Above The Fold 1257 3rd St. Promenade Santa Monica, CA attendance is down 3.3% from last year. It’s anyone’s guess why 90401 (310) 393-2690 this is happening, and frankly, it doesn’t matter, because next year the industry will be back in full force with the same schlep of Above The Fold 226 N. Larchmont Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90004 sequels, comic book heroes and mindless action-adventure (323) 464-NEWS extravaganzas. But maybe if we turn our backs to Hollywood’s fast food service, they will serve us something different.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future Of..., 29 J
    Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of..., 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 2016 Article Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of Environmental Governance in Canada Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith a1 Copyright © 2016 by Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.; Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith This paper provides an introduction to sources of Indigenous law and the theoretical underpinnings of Indigenous law-based approaches to contemporary environmental management in Canada. It then explores three case studies of Indigenous peoples that have used approaches grounded in their ancestral legal traditions to confront contemporary threats to their lands and waters. These case studies highlight how the Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs, the Tsleil-Waututh Nation and the Yinka Dene Alliance have effectively drawn on and enforced their own laws in order to address challenges to the integrity of their respective territories from resource development. Finally, the paper comments on the significance of this revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions and their application to contemporary environmental problems in light of federal environmental deregulation. It posits that the current revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions should be of interest to anyone concerned with the question of environmental governance in Canada today. Dans cet article, les auteurs retracent les sources du droit autochtone et les bases théoriques des approches fondées sur le droit autochtone de la gestion environnementale contemporaine au Canada. Ils explorent ensuite trois situations où des peuples autochtones ont eu recours à des approches reposant sur leurs traditions juridiques ancestrales pour confronter des menaces contemporaines à leurs terres et eaux.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 and FY 2018
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting Appropriation Request and Justification FY2016 and FY2018 Submitted to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee February 2, 2015 This document with links to relevant public broadcasting sites is available on our Web site at: www.cpb.org Table of Contents Financial Summary …………………………..........................................................1 Narrative Summary…………………………………………………………………2 Section I – CPB Fiscal Year 2018 Request .....……………………...……………. 4 Section II – Interconnection Fiscal Year 2016 Request.………...…...…..…..… . 24 Section III – CPB Fiscal Year 2016 Request for Ready To Learn ……...…...…..39 FY 2016 Proposed Appropriations Language……………………….. 42 Appendix A – Inspector General Budget………………………..……..…………43 Appendix B – CPB Appropriations History …………………...………………....44 Appendix C – Formula for Allocating CPB’s Federal Appropriation………….....46 Appendix D – CPB Support for Rural Stations …………………………………. 47 Appendix E – Legislative History of CPB’s Advance Appropriation ………..…. 49 Appendix F – Public Broadcasting’s Interconnection Funding History ….…..…. 51 Appendix G – Ready to Learn Research and Evaluation Studies ……………….. 53 Appendix H – Excerpt from the Report on Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations ……………………………………………….…… 58 Appendix I – State Profiles…...………………………………………….….…… 87 Appendix J – The President’s FY 2016 Budget Request...…...…………………131 0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING’S (CPB) BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/2018 FY 2018 CPB Funding The Corporation for Public Broadcasting requests a $445 million advance appropriation for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. This is level funding compared to the amount provided by Congress for both FY 2016 and FY 2017, and is the amount requested by the Administration for FY 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordner, James
    Grassroots Resistance to the Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska By James Patrick Ordner Submitted to the graduate degree program in Sociology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______________________ Chairperson: David Smith ______________________ Robert Antonio ______________________ Eric Hanley ______________________ Kelly Kindscher ______________________ Joane Nagel ______________________ Bill Staples Date Defended: December 7, 2015 The Dissertation Committee for James Ordner certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Grassroots Resistance to the Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska ______________________ Chairperson: David N. Smith Date approved: December 7, 2015 ii Abstract: While the Keystone XL pipeline project became a major cultural and political symbol for the greater environmental movement’s effort to curb carbon dioxide emissions and begin shifting to a renewable energy economy, a vigorous and sustained grassroots movement, led by the social movement organization Bold Nebraska, emerged in rural Nebraska to fight the pipeline at the local level. Using the politics of contention perspective and framing analysis, this dissertation analyzes the Keystone XL debate in rural Nebraska at the structural, cultural and agency levels of analysis. At the structural and cultural levels, I use county demographic data to examine the sociopolitical factors shaping mobilization outcomes in Nebraskan communities. The main body of the analysis focuses on the narratives and discourses used by the various interests involved in the debate in Nebraska. Through the use of in-depth interviews and testimony from four public comment hearings held in Nebraska (N=528), I identify the major framing strategies employed by both pipeline supporters and pipeline opponents.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Institute Report on Activities
    CANADA INSTITUTE REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OCTOBER 1, 2008 – MARCH 30, 2010 / 1 / WOODROW WILSON CENTER Mission Statement The Woodrow Wilson Center is the living, national memorial to President Wilson, established by Congress in 1968 and headquar- tered in Washington, D.C. The Center is a nonpartisan institution, supported by public and private funds, engaged in the study of national and world affairs. The Center establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. The Center’s mission is to com- memorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the world of ideas and the world of policy and by fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spec- trum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. In addition to the more than 700 meetings and lectures it holds each year, the Wilson Center maintains an active campaign of outreach through books, newsletters, the award-winning Wilson Quarterly magazine, and the globally syndicated dialogue radio and television programs. CANADA INSTITUTE Mission Statement The Canada Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center works to increase awareness and knowledge about Canada and Canada-U.S. issues among U.S. policymakers and opinion leaders. Knowledge in the public service / 2 / CANADA INSTITUTE REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OCTOBER 1, 2008 – MARCH 30, 2010 Canada’s profile among Americans important issues of the day, the Canada remains more limited than it should Institute’s programs and publica- in spite of the enormous trading and tions—both in the United States and cultural relationship between the in Canada—seek to increase aware- two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Updated April 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43787 Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Summary TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for further delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day. Because it would cross the Canadian-U.S. border, Keystone XL requires a Presidential Permit from the State Department based on a determination that the pipeline would “serve the national interest.” To make its national interest determination (NID), the department considers potential effects on energy security; environmental and cultural resources; the economy; foreign policy, and other factors. Effects on environmental and cultural resources are determined by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NID process also provides for public comment and requires the State Department to consult with specific federal agencies. TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. Since then various issues have affected the completion of both the NEPA and NID processes for the project. In particular, during the NID process for the 2008 application, concerns over environmental impacts in the Sand Hills of Nebraska led the state to enact new requirements that would change the pipeline route. Facing a 60-day decision deadline imposed by Congress, the State Department denied the 2008 permit application on the grounds that it lacked information about the new Nebraska route.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2 Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report
    ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2 ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL ResPONSIBILITY RePORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ... About Enbridge 34 ... Environmental Performance 35 Goals and Performance 2 ... About the Enbridge 2011 Corporate 35 Environmental Scorecard Social Responsibility Report 36 Environmental Performance Indicators 3 ... Forward-Looking Information 36 EN1 – Materials used by weight or volume. 36 EN2 – Percentage of materials used that are recycled 4 ... Awards and Recognition input materials. 5 ... Strategy and Profile 36 EN3 – Direct energy consumption by primary energy source. 5 Organizational Profile 36 EN4 – Indirect energy consumption by primary source. 6 Report Parameters 39 EN5 – Energy saved due to conservation and 11 ... Governance, Commitments and Engagement efficiency improvements. 11 Governance (Enbridge Inc.) 39 EN6 – Initiatives to provide energy-efficient or renewable 13 Commitments to External Initiatives energy-based products and services, and reductions in 15 Stakeholder Engagement energy requirements as a result of these initiatives. 18 ... Overall Management Approach 41 EN7 – Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and to Corporate Social Responsibility reductions achieved. 19 ... Economic Performance 43 EN8 – Total water withdrawal by source. 20 Goals and Performance 43 EN9 – Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water. 20 Economic Scorecard 43 EN10 – Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused. 26 Economic Performance Indicators 44 EN11 – Location and size of land owned, leased, managed in, 26 EC1 – Direct economic value generated and distributed, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value including revenues, operating costs, employee compensation, outside protected areas. donations and other community investments, retained earnings, and payments to capital providers and governments.
    [Show full text]