DOCSLIB.ORG

Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2 Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2 Enbridge 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Report ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2 ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL ResPONSIBILITY RePORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ... About Enbridge 34 ... Environmental Performance 35 Goals and Performance 2 ... About the Enbridge 2011 Corporate 35 Environmental Scorecard Social Responsibility Report 36 Environmental Performance Indicators 3 ... Forward-Looking Information 36 EN1 – Materials used by weight or volume. 36 EN2 – Percentage of materials used that are recycled 4 ... Awards and Recognition input materials. 5 ... Strategy and Profile 36 EN3 – Direct energy consumption by primary energy source. 5 Organizational Profile 36 EN4 – Indirect energy consumption by primary source. 6 Report Parameters 39 EN5 – Energy saved due to conservation and 11 ... Governance, Commitments and Engagement efficiency improvements. 11 Governance (Enbridge Inc.) 39 EN6 – Initiatives to provide energy-efficient or renewable 13 Commitments to External Initiatives energy-based products and services, and reductions in 15 Stakeholder Engagement energy requirements as a result of these initiatives. 18 ... Overall Management Approach 41 EN7 – Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and to Corporate Social Responsibility reductions achieved. 19 ... Economic Performance 43 EN8 – Total water withdrawal by source. 20 Goals and Performance 43 EN9 – Water sources significantly affected by withdrawal of water. 20 Economic Scorecard 43 EN10 – Percentage and total volume of water recycled and reused. 26 Economic Performance Indicators 44 EN11 – Location and size of land owned, leased, managed in, 26 EC1 – Direct economic value generated and distributed, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value including revenues, operating costs, employee compensation, outside protected areas. donations and other community investments, retained earnings, and payments to capital providers and governments. 44 EN12 – Description of significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity in protected areas and areas of high 29 EC2 – Financial implications and other risks and opportunities biodiversity value outside protected areas. for the organization’s activities due to climate change. 44 EN13 – Habitats protected or restored. 30 EC3 – Coverage of the organization’s defined benefit plan obligations. 44 EN14 – Strategies, current actions and future plans for managing impacts on biodiversity. 31 EC4 – Significant financial assistance received from government. 44 EN15 – Number of IUCN Red List species and national conservation 32 EC5 – Range of ratios of standard entry-level wages compared list species with habitats in areas affected with local minimum wages at significant locations of operation. by operations, by level of extinction risk. 32 EC6 – Policy, practices and proportion of spending on 46 EN16 – Total direct and indirect GHG emissions by weight. locally-based suppliers at significant locations of operation. 46 EN17 – Other relevant indirect GHG emissions by weight. 32 EC7 – Procedures for local hiring and proportion of senior management hired from the local community at locations of 48 EN18 – Initiatives to reduce GHG emissions and significant operation. reductions achieved. 33 EC8 – Development and impact of infrastructure investments and 50 EN19 – Emissions of ozone-depleting substances by weight. services provided primarily for public benefit through commercial, 51 EN20 – NO, SO and other significant air emissions. in-kind, or pro bono engagement. 52 EN21 – Total water discharge by quality and destination. 33 EC9 – Understanding and describing significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of impacts. 53 EN22 – Total weight of waste by type and disposal method. 53 EN23 – Total number and volume of significant spills. 3 ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL ResPONSIBILITY RePORT 53 EN24 – Weight of transported, imported, exported, or treated 86 LA9 – Health and safety topics covered in formal agreements with waste deemed hazardous under the terms of the Basel Convention trade unions. Annex I, II, III and VIII, and percentage of transported waste 86 LA10 – Average hours of training per year per employee by shipped internationally. employee category. 53 EN25 – Identity, size, protected status and biodiversity value of 87 LA11 – Programs for skills management and lifelong learning that water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by the support the continued employability of employees and assist them reporting organization’s discharges of water and runoff. in managing career endings. 61 EN26 – Initiatives to mitigate environmental impacts of products 87 LA12 – Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and services, and extent of impact mitigation. and career development reviews. 61 EN27 – Percentage of products sold and their packaging materials 88 LA13 – Composition of governance bodies and breakdown of that are reclaimed by category. (Note: Not relevant to Enbridge). employees per category according to gender, age group, minority 68 EN28 – Monetary value of significant fines and total number of group membership and other indicators of diversity. non-monetary sanctions for noncompliance with environmental 90 LA14 – Ratio of basic salary of men to women by laws and regulations. employee category. 69 EN29 – Significant environmental impacts of transporting ... products and other goods and materials used for the 90 Human Rights 91 Performance Indicators organization’s operations and transporting members of 91 HR1 – Percentage and total number of significant investment the workforce. agreements that include human rights clauses or that have 69 EN30 – Total environmental protection expenditures and undergone human rights screening. investments by type. 91 HR2 – Percentage of significant suppliers and contractors that 72 ... Social Performance have undergone screening on human rights and actions taken. 73 Goals and Performance 91 HR3 – Total hours of employee training on policies and procedures 73 Social Scorecard concerning aspects of human rights that are relevant to 82 ... Labour Practices and Decent Work operations, including the percentage of employees trained. 82 Performance Indicators 92 HR4 – Total number of incidents of discrimination and 82 LA1 – Total workforce by employment type, employment contract actions taken. and region. 92 HR5 – Operations identified in which the right to exercise freedom 82 LA2 – Total number and rate of employee turnover by age group, of association and collective bargaining may be at significant risk gender and region. and actions taken to support these rights. 83 LA3 – Benefits provided to full-time employees that are 92 HR6 – Operations identified as having significant risk for incidents not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by of child labour and measures taken to contribute to the elimination major operations. of child labour. 84 LA4 – Percentage of employees covered by collective 92 HR7 – Operations identified as having significant risk for incidents bargaining agreements. of forced or compulsory labour and measures to contribute to the elimination of forced or compulsory labour. 84 LA5 – Minimum notice period(s) regarding operational changes, including whether they are specified in collective agreements. 92 HR8 – Percentage of security personnel trained in the organization’s policies or procedures concerning aspects of 84 LA6 – Percentage of total workforce represented in formal joint human rights that are relevant to operations. management-worker health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs. 93 HR9 – Total number of incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous people and actions taken. 85 LA7 – Rates of injury, occupational diseases, lost days and absenteeism, and number of work-related fatalities by region. 85 LA8 – Education, training, counseling, prevention and risk-control programs in place to assist workforce members, their families or community members regarding serious diseases. 4 ENBRIDGE 2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL ResPONSIBILITY RePORT 93 ... Society 139 ... Product Responsibility 95 Performance Indicators 140 Performance Indicators 95 SO1 – Nature, scope and effectiveness of any programs and 140 PR1 – Life cycle stages in which health and safety impacts practices that assess and manage the impacts of operations on of products and services are assessed for improvement, and communities, including entering, operating and exiting. percentage of significant products and services categories subject to such procedures. 95 Community Relations 100 Aboriginal & Native American Relations 140 PR2 – Total number of incidents of non-compliance with 110 Community Partnerships and Investments regulations and voluntary codes concerning health and safety impacts of products and services during their life cycle, 138 SO2 – Percentage and total number of business segments by type of outcomes. analyzed for risks related to corruption. 141 PR3 – Type of product and service information required by 138 SO3 – Percentage of employees trained in organization’s procedures, and percentage of significant products and services anti-corruption policies and procedures. subject to such information requirements. 138 S04 – Actions taken in response to incidents of corruption. 142 PR4 – Total number of incidents of non-compliance with 138 SO5 – Public policy positions and participation in public policy regulations and voluntary codes concerning product and service development and lobbying. information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: a Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014
    Media Coverage of Oil Sands Pipelines: A Chronological Record of Headlines from 2010 to 2014 Oil Sands Research and Information Network School of Energy and the Environment University of Alberta December 2014 Oil Sands Research and Information Network The Oil Sands Research and Information Network (OSRIN) is a university-based, independent organization that compiles, interprets and analyses available knowledge about managing the environmental impacts to landscapes and water affected by oil sands mining and gets that knowledge into the hands of those who can use it to drive breakthrough improvements in regulations and practices. OSRIN is a project of the University of Alberta’s School of Energy and the Environment (SEE). OSRIN was launched with a start-up grant of $4.5 million from Alberta Environment and a $250,000 grant from the Canada School of Energy and Environment Ltd. OSRIN provides: Governments with the independent, objective, and credible information and analysis required to put appropriate regulatory and policy frameworks in place Media, opinion leaders and the general public with the facts about oil sands development, its environmental and social impacts, and landscape/water reclamation activities – so that public dialogue and policy is informed by solid evidence Industry with ready access to an integrated view of research that will help them make and execute environmental management plans – a view that crosses disciplines and organizational boundaries OSRIN recognizes that much research has been done in these areas by a variety of players over 40 years of oil sands development. OSRIN synthesizes this collective knowledge and presents it in a form that allows others to use it to solve pressing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future Of..., 29 J
    Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of..., 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 29 J. Env. L. & Prac. 227 Journal of Environmental Law and Practice 2016 Article Indigenous Legal Traditions and the Future of Environmental Governance in Canada Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith a1 Copyright © 2016 by Thomson Reuters Canada Limited.; Jessica Clogg, Hannah Askew, Eugene Kung, Gavin Smith This paper provides an introduction to sources of Indigenous law and the theoretical underpinnings of Indigenous law-based approaches to contemporary environmental management in Canada. It then explores three case studies of Indigenous peoples that have used approaches grounded in their ancestral legal traditions to confront contemporary threats to their lands and waters. These case studies highlight how the Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs, the Tsleil-Waututh Nation and the Yinka Dene Alliance have effectively drawn on and enforced their own laws in order to address challenges to the integrity of their respective territories from resource development. Finally, the paper comments on the significance of this revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions and their application to contemporary environmental problems in light of federal environmental deregulation. It posits that the current revitalization of Indigenous legal traditions should be of interest to anyone concerned with the question of environmental governance in Canada today. Dans cet article, les auteurs retracent les sources du droit autochtone et les bases théoriques des approches fondées sur le droit autochtone de la gestion environnementale contemporaine au Canada. Ils explorent ensuite trois situations où des peuples autochtones ont eu recours à des approches reposant sur leurs traditions juridiques ancestrales pour confronter des menaces contemporaines à leurs terres et eaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Updated April 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43787 Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Summary TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for further delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day. Because it would cross the Canadian-U.S. border, Keystone XL requires a Presidential Permit from the State Department based on a determination that the pipeline would “serve the national interest.” To make its national interest determination (NID), the department considers potential effects on energy security; environmental and cultural resources; the economy; foreign policy, and other factors. Effects on environmental and cultural resources are determined by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NID process also provides for public comment and requires the State Department to consult with specific federal agencies. TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. Since then various issues have affected the completion of both the NEPA and NID processes for the project. In particular, during the NID process for the 2008 application, concerns over environmental impacts in the Sand Hills of Nebraska led the state to enact new requirements that would change the pipeline route. Facing a 60-day decision deadline imposed by Congress, the State Department denied the 2008 permit application on the grounds that it lacked information about the new Nebraska route.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Song: Indigenous Women and Water - the Solutions Journal 2018-04-12, 1036 AM
    Water Song: Indigenous Women and Water - The Solutions Journal 2018-04-12, 1036 AM Search Query # Become a Member (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/membership) Login (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/) Home (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/) / Water Song: Indigenous Women and Water Topics: Indigenous communities (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/topic/indigenous-communities) | Water (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/topic/water) | Women " Export Citation THIS ARTICLE IS PART OF: Water Song: Indigenous Women and Water Volume 7 | Issue 6 | November 2016 Volume 7 | Issue 6 | Page 64-73 | November 2016 By Kate Cave (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/author/kate-cave/), Shianne McKay (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/author/shianne-mckay/) Purchase PDF (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/article/water-song-indigenous-women-water/purchase/) (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/issue/volume- 7-issue-6-securing-water-women-changing- world/) (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/issue/volume-View Now ○ 7-issue-6-securing-water-women-changing- world/) (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/article/water-song-indigenous-women-water/) Lake Winnipeg Water Walk Katherine Morrisseau-Sinclair, an Indigenous woman who, inspired by Grandmother Josephine Mandamin, started the Lake Winnipeg Water Walk. In Brief Water is life and needs to be respected. For the Indigenous people in Canada, there is a reciprocal and (https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/membership) unique relationship with water. In particular, Indigenous women share a sacred connection to the spirit of water through their role as child bearers, and have particular responsibilities to protect and nurture water. The forces of colonization and the lack of services to sustain reserves (space), residential schools (relationships), and federally imposed Elected Council systems (governance) have led to a disconnect in the intergenerational transfer of knowledge surrounding water.
    [Show full text]
  • IDLE NO MORE: a Protest for Aboriginal Rights
    News in Review – March 2013 – Teacher Resource Guide IDLE NO MORE: A Protest for Aboriginal Rights MINDS‐ON ACTIVITY: Considering Personal Bias Your teacher will write the six statements below on the board. After each statement is read aloud, you will be asked to indicate your reaction to each statement by showing: • Thumbs up (I think this is a true statement) • Thumbs down (I think this is a false statement) • Thumbs sideways (I'm not sure) Idle No More is an environmental movement to protect Canada's water and natural resources 1 from exploitation. 2 Idle No More is a group of angry Native people engaged in disruptive protests. Idle No More represents diverse groups of Aboriginal people coming together for greater 3 justice and self-determination. 4 Idle No More began as an online protest movement created by four Aboriginal women. 5 The Idle No More movement is gathering strength and support. The Idle No More movement is making unreasonable demands on the Canadian 6 government and Prime Minister Harper. After you have indicated your initial beliefs — don’t worry, there are no right or wrong responses — consider the following questions. Use these questions to examine your own personal bias/perspective and the origins of that bias/perspective. (Your teacher may also model answers to the questions.) 1. Do you feel well informed about the Idle No More movement? Why or why not? 2. What has been the source of your information on this topic (friends, family, social media, direct involvement, school, the media)? 3. Do you think these sources are biased? Do they represent multiple perspectives on the issue? Where do you think you need to go for more information? 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Alternatives
    3.0 ALTERNATIVES Alternatives to the Alberta Clipper Project were analyzed to determine whether they would be reasonable and environmentally preferable to the proposed action. Identification and evaluation of alternatives to the proposed Project considered public comments and input received from federal, state, tribal and local agency representatives and the public. Enbridge held a variety of public open houses and agency and stakeholder meetings while developing the proposed route. In addition, DOS held 13 scoping meetings during development of the proposed Project to identify and evaluate alternatives that could avoid or minimize potential impacts. In the initial stages of route selection studies for the Alberta Clipper Project, Enbridge based its evaluations on two primary routing assumptions. First, since the new pipeline would have the same origination and destination points as the existing Enbridge pipelines in this area (i.e., originating at the U.S./Canada border near Neche, North Dakota and extending to the existing Superior Terminal), installing it adjacent to the existing pipelines would be preferable to constructing a new route through undisturbed areas. A route along the existing Enbridge pipeline corridor would also result in more efficient and effective management of operation and maintenance of the new pipeline compared to a route that would not be adjacent to the existing pipelines. The second assumption was that when building a new pipeline adjacent to an existing pipeline, the best location is on the side of the existing right-of-way that was used as the working side for the most recent pipeline construction. This would reduce the extent of environmental impacts by using areas disturbed during previous pipeline construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Profile
    Out on the Tar Sands Mainline Mapping Enbridge’s Web of Pipelines A Corporate Profile of Pipeline Company Enbridge By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute Research Coordinator with Contributions from Tanya Roberts Davis Out on the Tar Sands Mainline: Mapping Enbridge’s Dirty Web of Pipelines May 2010 (partially updated, March 2012). The Polaris Institute The Polaris Institute is a public interest research and advocacy organization based in Canada. Since 1999 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies for civic action on major public policy issues, including energy security, water rights and free trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalf Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone : 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org For more information on the Polaris Institute’s energy campaign please visit www.tarsandswatch.org Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 1. Organizational Profile ...................................................................................................5 1.1 Enbridge’s Business Structure ....................................................................................5 1.1.1 Liquids
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 1 3 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 1 4 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 13 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 14 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]