ONA RUSSELL SAN MIGUEL 2019 WRITERS’ CONFERENCE [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ONA RUSSELL SAN MIGUEL 2019 WRITERS’ CONFERENCE Onarussell@Gmail.Com

ONA RUSSELL SAN MIGUEL 2019 WRITERS’ CONFERENCE [email protected] www.onarussell.Com The Truth of HistoriCal FiCtion--Overview William Faulkner famously said that “the past is never dead.” Effective historical fiction confirms that statement by revealing eternal truths about the human condition. The settings may be in the past, but the stories resonate in the present. In this workshop, we’ll examine the basics—from research to voice to pacing—in creating such works. We’ll discuss how to write credibly without getting lost in the rabbit hole of detail. And more generally, we’ll explore the narrative relationship between the real and the imaginary. So hop on my time machine and begin your narrative journey! WorKshop Outline 1. Power point 2. Generate list of differences between history and fiction 3. Defining historical fiction—biographical, event, “making the shadow shine” 4. Choosing your subject 5. Perils and pleasures of research 6. How much detail to include, leave out? 7. Credibility 8. Pacing 9. Audience considerations ONA RUSSELL SAN MIGUEL WRITERS’ CONFERENCE The Truth of HistoriCal FiCtion Recommended Reading Novels Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel The General in His Labyrinth, by Gabriel Garcia Marquez The Blue Flower by Penelope Fitzgerald The Underground Railroad by Colin Whitehead Lincoln in the Bardo by George Sanders Sonata Mulattica by Rita Dove Non-Fiction Novel History—Historians and Novelists Confront Americas Past, ed. By Mark C. Carnes On Histories and Stories, by A. S. Byatt Book on writing From Where You Dream by Robert Olen Butler The Writers Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers by Christopher Vogler How Fiction WorKs by James Wood Story, by Robert McKee My titles O’Brien’s DesK The Natural Selection Rule of Capture .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Best According To
Books | The best according to... http://books.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,32972479299819,00.html The best according to... Interviews by Stephen Moss Friday February 23, 2007 Guardian Andrew Motion Poet laureate Choosing the greatest living writer is a harmless parlour game, but it might prove more than that if it provokes people into reading whoever gets the call. What makes a great writer? Philosophical depth, quality of writing, range, ability to move between registers, and the power to influence other writers and the age in which we live. Amis is a wonderful writer and incredibly influential. Whatever people feel about his work, they must surely be impressed by its ambition and concentration. But in terms of calling him a "great" writer, let's look again in 20 years. It would be invidious for me to choose one name, but Harold Pinter, VS Naipaul, Doris Lessing, Michael Longley, John Berger and Tom Stoppard would all be in the frame. AS Byatt Novelist Greatness lies in either (or both) saying something that nobody has said before, or saying it in a way that no one has said it. You need to be able to do something with the English language that no one else does. A great writer tells you something that appears to you to be new, but then you realise that you always knew it. Great writing should make you rethink the world, not reflect current reality. Amis writes wonderful sentences, but he writes too many wonderful sentences one after another. I met a taxi driver the other day who thought that.
[Show full text]
Romanında Yabancılaşma1 Defamiliarization in Penelope Fitzgerald’S Novel “The Bookshop”
SDÜ FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, AĞUSTOS 2020, SAYI: 50, SS. 115-124 SDU FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, AUGUST 2020, No: 50, PP. 115-124 Makale Geliş | Received : 08.05.2020 Makale Kabul | Accepted : 12.08.2020 Penelope Fitzgerald’ın “Sahaf”* Romanında Yabancılaşma1 Defamiliarization in Penelope Fitzgerald’s Novel “The Bookshop” Yeşim Sultan AKBAY Arş. Gör. Yeşim Sultan AKBAY, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Batı Dilleri ve Edebiyatı Bölümü, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı, [email protected]. ORCID Numarası ORCID Numbers: 0000-0001-8170-8219 Beture MEMMEDOVA Doç. Dr. Beture MEMMEDOVA, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Batı Dilleri ve Edebiyatı Bölümü, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı, [email protected]. ORCID Numarası ORCID Numbers: 0000-0002-2992-8035 Abstract The aim of the present paper is to reveal how Penelope Fitzgerald (1916-2000), the well-known English writer, employs defamiliarization device in her second novel The Bookshop (1978). Penelope Fitzgerald is mainly known for her distinctive and elegant style, called by many critics the “quiet genius” of the late twentieth-century English fiction. She can also be called the master of the uncanny, or ostranenie (making it strange), as the Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky defined it. Penelope Fitzgerald brings quite new and original interpretations to the familiar concepts like morality, courage, kindness, help and hope. Through the literary concept of defamiliarization, the reader gains a new awareness of these issues. In her novels, essays, reviews and letters, she surprises the reader by defamiliarizing these well-known notions, loading them with new meaning and surprising the reader with the newly discovered truths which had always been there unnoticed by readers.
[Show full text]
"The Problem of Predicting What Will Last"
Allan Massie, "The Problem of Predicting What Will Last" Booksonline, with Amazon.co.uk (An Electronic Telegraph Publication) 4 January 2000 As our Book of the Century series concludes, Allan Massie compares the list with one published by The Daily Telegraph 100 years ago EACH WEEK for the past two years The Daily Telegraph’s literary editor has asked a contributor to name and describe his or her "Book of the Century", and today the series concludes with Arthur C. Clarke’s choice. The full selection invites comparison with a list drawn up by The Telegraph a century ago; we print both here. The comparison cannot, however, be exact. All the books chosen in 1899 were fiction - the paper offered its readers the "100 Best Novels in the World", selected by the editor "with the assistance of Sir Edwin Arnold, K. C. I. E, H. D. Traill, D. C. L, and W. L. Courtney, LL. D.". The modern list includes poetry, plays, history, diaries, philosophy, economics, memoirs, biography and travel writing. It is certainly eclectic, ranging from Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, selected by David Sylvester, to The Wind in the Willows, chosen by John Bayley, and Down with Skool, Wendy Cope’s Book of the Century. The 1899 list, on offer at the time in a cloth-bound edition at nine guineas the lot (easy terms available), is homogeneous, as the modern one is not, not only because it consists entirely of works of fiction but also because the selection was made by a small group. And since they were picking the 100 Best Novels, they were able to include books that nobody might name as a single "Book of the Century" but which many might put in their top 20 or so.
[Show full text]
Addition to Summer Letter
May 2020 Dear Student, You are enrolled in Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition for the coming school year. Bowling Green High School has offered this course since 1983. I thought that I would tell you a little bit about the course and what will be expected of you. Please share this letter with your parents or guardians. A.P. Literature and Composition is a year-long class that is taught on a college freshman level. This means that we will read college level texts—often from college anthologies—and we will deal with other materials generally taught in college. You should be advised that some of these texts are sophisticated and contain mature themes and/or advanced levels of difficulty. In this class we will concentrate on refining reading, writing, and critical analysis skills, as well as personal reactions to literature. A.P. Literature is not a survey course or a history of literature course so instead of studying English and world literature chronologically, we will be studying a mix of classic and contemporary pieces of fiction from all eras and from diverse cultures. This gives us an opportunity to develop more than a superficial understanding of literary works and their ideas. Writing is at the heart of this A.P. course, so you will write often in journals, in both personal and researched essays, and in creative responses. You will need to revise your writing. I have found that even good students—like you—need to refine, mature, and improve their writing skills. You will have to work diligently at revising major essays.
[Show full text]
Golden Man Booker Prize Shortlist Celebrating Five Decades of the Finest Fiction
Press release Under embargo until 6.30pm, Saturday 26 May 2018 Golden Man Booker Prize shortlist Celebrating five decades of the finest fiction www.themanbookerprize.com| #ManBooker50 The shortlist for the Golden Man Booker Prize was announced today (Saturday 26 May) during a reception at the Hay Festival. This special one-off award for Man Booker Prize’s 50th anniversary celebrations will crown the best work of fiction from the last five decades of the prize. All 51 previous winners were considered by a panel of five specially appointed judges, each of whom was asked to read the winning novels from one decade of the prize’s history. We can now reveal that that the ‘Golden Five’ – the books thought to have best stood the test of time – are: In a Free State by V. S. Naipaul; Moon Tiger by Penelope Lively; The English Patient by Michael Ondaatje; Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel; and Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders. Judge Year Title Author Country Publisher of win Robert 1971 In a Free V. S. Naipaul UK Picador McCrum State Lemn Sissay 1987 Moon Penelope Lively UK Penguin Tiger Kamila 1992 The Michael Canada Bloomsbury Shamsie English Ondaatje Patient Simon Mayo 2009 Wolf Hall Hilary Mantel UK Fourth Estate Hollie 2017 Lincoln George USA Bloomsbury McNish in the Saunders Bardo Key dates 26 May to 25 June Readers are now invited to have their say on which book is their favourite from this shortlist. The month-long public vote on the Man Booker Prize website will close on 25 June.
[Show full text]
Iris Murdoch: Days Without Writing1
Iris Murdoch: days without writing1 Peter Garrard1, John R. Hodges2, Vijeya Ganesan3 and Karalyn Patterson4 1) Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St George’s, University of London Cranmer Terrace London SW17 0RE United Kingdom 2) Brain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney Level 1 M02F 94 Mallett St Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia 3) UCL-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Guilford Street London WC1N 3JH 4) Dept of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge Herchel Smith Building, Robinson Way Cambridge CB2 0SZ 1 In honour of her friend, A.N. Wilson’s moving tribute to Iris’s dedication as a writer: “Her patient, humble working life was an example to any writer. Nulla dies sine linea, as Erasmus decreed – not a day should pass without writing something. She was entirely without fuss in her approach to work. When JOB broke his ankle, she sat at the end of his hospital bed with a large pad, writing her novel. If she had an hour to kill waiting for a train, out would come the pad once more. There was no nonsense about need to write in a special place or with special nibs. She was humbly the servant of her craft….” (Wilson, 2004, p. 263) In 2005, you published a report examining changes in the writing of the author Iris Murdoch from the start of her career, the peak of her career and finally the end of her career when she was considered to be in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. This case may be relevant to our understanding of memory processes and deficits in Alzheimer’s disease.
[Show full text]
The History of British Women's Writing General Editors: Jennie Batchelor
The History of British Women’s Writing General Editors: Jennie Batchelor and Cora Kaplan Advisory Board: Isobel Armstrong, Rachel Bowlby, Helen Carr, Carolyn Dinshaw, Margaret Ezell, Margaret Ferguson, Isobel Grundy, and Felicity Nussbaum The History of British Women’s Writing is an innovative and ambitious monograph series that seeks both to synthesise the work of several generations of feminist schol- ars, and to advance new directions for the study of women’s writing. Volume editors and contributors are leading scholars whose work collectively refl ects the global excellence in this expanding fi eld of study. It is envisaged that this series will be a key resource for specialist and non- specialist scholars and students alike. Titles include: Liz Herbert McAvoy and Diane Watt (editors) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 700– 1500 Volume One Caroline Bicks and Jennifer Summit (editors) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 1500– 1610 Volume Two Mihoko Suzuki (editor) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 1610– 1690 Volume Three Ros Ballaster (editor) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 1690– 1750 Volume Four Jacqueline M. Labbe (editor) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 1750– 1830 Volume Five Mary Joannou (editor) THE HISTORY OF BRITISH WOMEN’S WRITING, 1920– 1945 Volume Eight The History of British Women’s Writing Series Standing Order ISBN 978– 0– 230– 20079– 1 hardback (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of diffi culty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and the ISBN quoted above.
[Show full text]
SAVU, LAURA E., Ph.D. Postmortem Postmodernists: Authorship and Cultural Revisionism in Late Twentieth-Century Narrative. (2006) Directed by Dr
SAVU, LAURA E., Ph.D. Postmortem Postmodernists: Authorship and Cultural Revisionism in Late Twentieth-Century Narrative. (2006) Directed by Dr. Keith Cushman. 331 pp The past three decades have witnessed an explosion of narratives in which the literary greats are brought back to life, reanimated and bodied forth in new textual bodies. In the works herein examined—Penelope Fitzgerald’s The Blue Flower, Peter Ackroyd’s The Last Testament of Oscar Wilde and Chatterton, Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs, Michael Cunningham’s The Hours, Colm Toíbín’s The Master, and Geoff Dyer’s Out of Sheer Rage: Wrestling with D.H. Lawrence—the obsession with biography spills over into fiction, the past blends with the present, history with imagination. Thus they articulate, reflect on, and can be read through postmodern concerns about language and representation, authorship and creativity, narrative and history, rewriting and the posthumous. As I argue, late twentieth-century fiction “postmodernizes” romantic and modern authors not only to understand them better, but also to understand itself in relation to a past (literary tradition, aesthetic paradigms, cultural formations, etc.) that has not really passed. More specifically, these works project a postmodern understanding of the author as a historically and culturally contingent subjectivity constructed along the lines of gender, sexual orientation, class, and nationality. The immediate implications of my argument are twofold, and they emerge as the common threads linking the chapters that make up this study. First, to make a case for the return of the author into the contemporary literary space is to acknowledge that the postmodern, its antihumanist bias notwithstanding, does not discount the human.
[Show full text]
Penelope Fitzgerald Adlington, Hugh
University of Birmingham Penelope Fitzgerald Adlington, Hugh License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Adlington, H 2018, Penelope Fitzgerald. Writers and their Work, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Published by Liverpool University Press on 30/07/2018. © Liverpool University Press General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate.
[Show full text]
The Booker: Prized in Public Libraries?
The Booker: Prized in Public Libraries? An investigation into the attitudes of public librarians towards the Man Booker Prize for Fiction. A study submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Librarianship at The University of Sheffield by Karl Hemsley September 2003 1 Acknowledgements I owe thanks, first of all, to the fifteen librarians who so kindly gave of their time to be interviewed for this work. They all paid me the compliment of taking my questions seriously and providing thoughtful replies. I would also like to thank Lord Baker of Dorking, Mariella Frostrup, Simon Jenkins and Russell Celyn Jones, four former judges of the Booker Prize, who replied to emails that I sent rather late in the day. It was very kind of them to take the trouble to do this. I am very grateful to my supervisor, Professor Bob Usherwood, for his encouragement and advice, which have helped to make doing this piece of work an enjoyable experience, and much less daunting than it would otherwise have been. Finally, thanks to Bess for the loan of the digital recorder and helping this Luddite by putting the interviews onto disk. I still haven’t worked out where the cassettes go. 2 Abstract This report examines the attitude of a selection of public librarians towards the Man Booker Prize for Fiction. Fifteen librarians, from five library authorities in the north of England, were interviewed, in order to ascertain their opinions regarding the Booker and its place in public libraries. The report also considers the views of commentators on the Booker and literature concerning fiction provision in public libraries.
[Show full text]
Reader's Guide for the Blue Flower and the Bookshop Published By
MARINER BOOKS THE BLUE FLOWER HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY “A masterpiece. How does she do it?”—A. S. Byatt Friedrich Leopold, Baron von Hardenberg (1772–1801), was born in Oberwiederstadt, Germany, studied law, philosophy, and history, worked A Reader’s Guide as a government auditor at Weissenfels, and — under the pseudonym Novalis—became known as the “prophet of Romanticism.” Best known for his Sacred Songs (1799) and Hymns to the Night (1800), Novalis left unfinished two prose narratives, the more important of which, Heinrich PENELOPE FITZGERALD von Ofterdingen, centers on a mystical young poet in search of a myste- rious blue flower. Penelope Fitzgerald has taken the facts of Novalis’s short life and fashioned a remarkable, poetic novel of irrational love, passionate thought, and the transfiguration of the commonplace. The Blue Flower, chosen nineteen times in England as the 1995 “Book of the Year,” also “No writer is more presents an uncannily convincing view of landscape and life in late-eigh- engaging than teenth-century Saxony — its small towns, universities, estates, and Penelope Fitzgerald.” people, from humble to noble. — Anita Brookner, In her inimitably magical way, Fitzgerald reconstructs Fritz von The Spectator Hardenberg’s formative years, from his childhood in a large family through the death in 1797 of his beloved Sophie von Kühn, as well as the society that he sought to transform and transcend. It is Fritz’s inexplica- ble, impetuous love for the plain, twelve-year-old Sophie, however, that is both focus and fulcrum for this “quite astonishing. masterpiece.” (New York Times Book Review) THE BOOKSHOP “A beautiful book, a perfect little gem.”—BBC “Kaleidoscope” Penelope Fitzgerald’s second novel, her first to be short-listed for England’s prestigious Booker Prize, is set in the small East Anglian town of Hardborough in 1959.
[Show full text]
View That Saw Women As Property Lay at the Core of Annabella‘S Problem and Served As a Catalyst for Her Narrative Creation
TRESPASSING WOMEN: REPRESENTATIONS OF PROPERTY AND IDENTITY IN BRITISH WOMEN‘S WRITING 1925 - 2005 by JAMIE LYNN MCDANIEL Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Kurt Koenigsberger Department of English CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of ________Jamie Lynn McDaniel___________________________ candidate for the __English PhD_______________degree *. (signed)_____Kurt Koenigsberger_______________________ (chair of the committee) ___________Mary Grimm_________________________ ___________Gary Stonum__________________ ___________Joseph Fagan_______________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) ___July 9, 2010________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Dedication To Ann Cobb, Teresa Noell, and Sonja Adams, who cultivated my early love of literature, To my grandparents, who instilled in me a sense of fairness, And to my parents, Jackie and Jane McDaniel, whose hard work and dedication have made me who I am today. iii Table of Contents Introduction Narratives of Identity, the Gender Propriety of Property, and Tactics of Trespassing …………………..………………………...8 Chapter One ―Her house was no longer hers entirely‖: Legal Classification, Biographical Narratives, and the Law of Intestacy in Virginia Woolf‘s Orlando
[Show full text]