DOCSLIB.ORG

The State of Abortion in Pennsylvania. 2015 Report: Historic Trends, 'House of Horrors' and Record Highs in Spending

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State of Abortion in Pennsylvania. 2015 Report: Historic Trends, 'House of Horrors' and Record Highs in Spending THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA. 2015 REPORT: HISTORIC TRENDS, 'HOUSE OF HORRORS' AND RECORD HIGHS IN SPENDING . f.. ,.... AbortionisPersonal.org A project of the Pennsylvania Family Council "The common and statutory law of Pennsylvania shall be construed so as to extend to the unborn the equal protection of the laws and to further the public policy of this Commonwealth encouraging childbirth over abortion." - PA ABORTION CONTROL ACT P E NNSYLVAN I A Family Council Protect the family. Preserve the future~ 23 North Front St., Harrisburg, PA 17101 www.pafamily.org I (717) 545-0600 For general information: [email protected] For media or speaking requests, contact Dan Bartkowiak: [email protected] Connect with us: f PAFamily TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Report Summary 4 II. How many abortions happen in Pennsylvania? 6 i. Abortion is down in PA - What does that mean? 7 ii. How many PA laws impact abortion? 8 iii. Where do abortions happen in Pennsylvania? 9 Ill. The largest abortion provider in Pennsylvania: Planned Parenthood. 10 i. Ten Realities of Planned Parenthood 11 IV. Conclusion 13 V. Notes 14 VI. Abortion: Quarterly Facilities Report 16 THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA- PAGE 4 REPORT SUMMARY Abortion in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania, more than any other state, has impacted the history of abortion in America. Philadelphia hosted the "Mother's Day Massacre" in 1972, when nine of 15 women were injured in testing a new, barbaric abortion procedure called the "super coil/' which lacerated the unborn with a bundle of razors. Pennsylvania brought the first state challenge to the extreme ruling of Roe v. Wade and paved the way for life-saving legislation across the country. And Pennsylvania was home to the Kermit Gosneii'House of Horrors' abortion clinic-the most horrific abortion facility yet to be exposed that It was Pennsylvania shocked the nation and shed light on the politically­ that brought the motivated decisions regarding lax clinic inspections. first state challenge Abortion in the United States peaked in 1990 and to the extreme ruling has gradually declined ever since. In Pennsylvania, of Roe v. Wade and abortion peaked a decade earlier (65,777 abortions were performed in 1980) and over the paved the way for last six years has steadily decreased-now down improvements across 17% since 2008. the country. This report makes available for the first time online the 2013 data from the '~bortion: Quarterly Facilities Report." This quarterly report is required to be filed with the Department of Health by every facility in which an induced abortion is performed within Pennsylvania. By showing these totals online we aim to bring more transparency to abortion in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania's laws-from the Abortion Control Act to abortion clinic regulations to the most recent "Chloe's Law''-have helped bring better safety measures, protections, and education to pregnant women and their families. These laws have improved the conditions surrounding abortion and have played a role in reducing the number of abortions in Pennsylvania. .. .::_.~.. f l THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA- PAGE 5 Planned Parenthood in Pennsylvania Even with decreasing abortion rates statewide, Planned Parenthood's abortion rate is at an all-time high. Planned Parenthood is Pennsylvania's largest and most lucrative chain of abortion businesses, with 33 locations that bring in some $35 million a year. It is the abortion industry's unquestioned market leader, selling more than half of Pennsylvania's 32,000 abortions in 2013. Planned Parenthood operates under the guise of providing a wide range of women's health services but over 90% of pregnant clients-many seeking prenatal care-end up with abortions. They report Further, a significant no adoption referrals. Further, a significant portion portion of their work of their work is funded by taxpayers-funding which is now at the highest levels ever. is funded by taxpayers­ funding which is now Having pledged to spend an unprecedented $1 at the highest levels ever. million to impact Pennsylvania's 2014 elections, including electing Governor Tom Wolf, Planned Parenthood is now seeking to undermine pro-life, pro-women's health protections in our state, and is seeking even more taxpayer dollars to expand their empire. For Planned Parenthood, abortion is business. For Pennsylvania women and their families, abortion is personal. .. .::_.~.. f l THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA- PAGE 6 HOW MANY ABORTIONS HAPPEN IN PENNSYLVANIA? 32,108-Total reported induced abortions in Pennsylvania for 2013. Each year the Department of Health reports on abortion statistics from the previous year. The latest numbers show that 32,108 abortions were performed in Pennsylvania in 2013-for the first time less than half of 1980's high point of 65,777. Abortion down 170/a since 2008. Since 2008 there has been a steady decline in abortion in Pennsylvania: 38,807 37,284 36,778 36,280 32,108 34 536 ' 32,108 ABORTIONS IN PAIN 2013 NEARLY 1 IN 5 PREGNANCIES in Pennsylvania result in an abortion.* 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 40,136- Total reported abortions from Gosnell's 'House of Horrors.' In 1993, "the Pennsylvania Department of Health abruptly decided, for political reasons, to stop inspecting abortion clinics." This allowed abortionist Kermit Gosnell to become a millionaire through his Women's Medical Society abortion Facility in Philadelphia. This Facility reported a total of 40,136 abortions From October 1988 to December 2009. On over 40,000 occasions a woman walked into his horriflc clinic for an abortion. Gosnell curren~y sits in jail serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. •source: Dept. of Health (2012)- Total Births= 140,873- Total Abortions= 33,166 .. .::_.~.. f l THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA- PAGE 7 ABORTION IS DOWN IN PA - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? The recent decrease in abortion in Pennsylvania can be attributed to several factors: 1. There are available alternatives to abortion. The Pennsylvania Alternative to Abortion Services Program works with social service agencies, pregnancy resource centers, maternity residences and adoption agencies to offer comprehensive, life-affirming alternatives to abortion. Also, there are 235 pregnancy resource centers across Pennsylvania-4th highest in the country.1 2. There have been signiRcant technological advancements. Ultrasound technology has been used since the 1970s, but over the last 10 years there have been significant improvements in medical imaging.2 This has led to a greater awareness of the development of a baby, and therefore of what an abortion involves. In Pennsylvania, there are 14 schools offering ultrasound degrees-4th highest in the country. And PA has the 5th highest employment rate of ultrasound technicians and diagnostic medical sonographers in the nation. 3. There's less of a stigma surrounding single parenting. The number of single parent families raising children in PA increased by 12% from 2000 to 2010.3 Less than half of U.S. children now live with their married parents and 26% of children are being raised by single parents. 4. Some abortion clinics have closed. The nHouse of Horrors» clinic was closed in 2010. And since 2011, there have been at least five abortion clinic shutdowns in Pennsylvania. 5. There's been a debate surrounding late-term abortions. The violent nature of abortion has been laid bare through medical imagery and public discourse, encouraging many to contemplate the humanity of the unborn. 6. More Pennsylvanians are pro-life. In 1996, Gallup polls showed 33% of Americans identified as pro-life with 56% as pro-choice. In 2013, the figures have shifted to 48% pro-life and 45% pro-choice:" .. .::_.~.. f l THE STATE OF ABORTION IN PENNSYLVANIA- PAGE 8 HOW MANY PA LAWS IMPACT ABORTION? PA Abortion Control Act: On November 18, 1989, Governor Bob Casey signed into law Pennsylvania's Abortion Control Act. This monumental law was the first action by any state to put safety restrictions on abortion since Roe v. Wade. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Pianned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, it upheld most of the law. The following provisions stand to this day: 1. Waiting Period - There must be a 24-hour waiting period between the flrst visit and the performing of an abortion. 2. Parental Consent- A minor must have consent from a parent or guardian before moving forward with an abortion. 3. Informed Consent - Speciflc information must be presented by an abortion clinic so the pregnant woman knows she can learn more about the unborn child and that medical assistance beneRts may be available to help with prenatal, childbirth and neonatal care. 4. Reporting- Clinics must report to the state on their abortion activity. 5. Public Funding- No tax dollars are used to fund abortions, with three exceptions (pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, or which threaten the life of the mother). 6. Sex-selective abortions- No abortion may be performed due to the sex of the child. Z 24-weeks Limit - No abortion may be performed after the 6th month of gestation, with an exception to save the mother from death or uirreversible impairment of a major bodily function." Act 122 It was only after Kermit Gosnell's arrest and his Facility's closure (due to a police raid on suspicion of selling illegal drugs) that Pennsylvania laws were changed to make sure abortion Facilities are inspected regularly. After nearly a year of debate, in December 2011 the legislature passed Senate Bill 732, bringing any abortion Facility up to the same rules and safety regulations as every other ambulatory surgical Facility in the state. This law, Act 122, took effect in June 2012. Other PA Laws: Chloe's Law (Act 130- 2014) Mandates that specific information be presented to Families when their baby is diagnosed with Down Syndrome.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Work of Pre-Abortion Counselors
    Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors A dissertation presented to the faculty of The Patton College of Education of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jennifer M. Conte December 2013 © 2013 Jennifer M. Conte: All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors by JENNIFER M. CONTE has been approved for the Department of Counseling and Higher Education and The Patton College of Education by Yegan Pillay Associate Professor of Counseling and Higher Education Renée A. Middleton Dean, The Patton College of Education 3 Abstract CONTE, JENNIFER M., Ph.D., December 2013, Counselor Education Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors Director of Dissertation: Yegan Pillay This qualitative study examined the experiences of individuals who work in abortion clinics as pre-abortion counselors. Interviewing was the primary method of inquiry. Although information regarding post-abortion distress is documented in the literature, pre-abortion counseling is rarely found in the literature. This study sought to fill a void in the literature by seeking to understand the experience of pre-abortion counselors. The documented experiences shared several themes such as a love for their job, having a non-judgmental attitude, and having a previous interest in reproductive health care. 4 Preface In qualitative methodology, the researcher is the instrument (Patton, 2002). Therefore, it is important to understand the lenses through which I am examining the phenomena of pre-abortion counseling. The vantage point that I offer is influenced by my experiences as a pre-abortion counselor. I have considered myself to be pro-choice ever since I can remember thinking about the topic of abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Abortion in Pennsylvania
    The State of Abortion in Source: Flickr – governortomwolf Pennsylvania The official policy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is to encourage childbirth over abortion. So, why is Planned Parenthood given millions of taxpayer dollars every year? Abortion in Pennsylvania has been on a steady decline; however, top state officials seem to be doing what they can to take our state in the opposition direction. A statistical review of abortion numbers, taxpayer funding of abortion-providing organizations, and campaign contributions to key government officials may explain why. Let’s take a look. Pennsylvania Family Council – pafamily.org 2 Pennsylvania Family Council – pafamily.org Abortion Numbers Declining According to the PA Department of Health, 30,818 babies were aborted in Pennsylvania in 2016, the lowest point ever recorded (even though the total matches the entire population of Williamsport or the entire student body of the University of Pittsburgh). It is a drop of nearly 1,000 from the previous year. Half of those abortions were performed by Planned Parenthood, a self-described political organization that has spent millions in Pennsylvania lobbying and campaigning for elected officials. And in some cases, especially with the help of some of Pennsylvania’s top officials, it appears Planned Parenthood is receiving reciprocal benefits. Consider: Attorney General Josh Shapiro Planned Parenthood was one of Shapiro’s top campaign donors in 2016, with nearly $20,000 directly donated to his campaign.1 His first TV ad touted their endorsement. Leading into the 2016 primary election, Shapiro ran an attack ad against his competitor, Stephen Zappala, alleging his campaign refused to fill out a questionnaire from Planned Parenthood (which he denied as simply a campaign oversight).2 The ad first aired on April 15, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Abortion Demand in Pennsylvania 2000 - 2010 Guido Giuntini
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2014 An Analysis Of Abortion Demand In Pennsylvania 2000 - 2010 Guido Giuntini Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Giuntini, Guido, "An Analysis Of Abortion Demand In Pennsylvania 2000 - 2010" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 1654. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1654 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF ABORTION DEMAND IN PENNSYLVANIA 2000 - 2010 by Guido Giuntini A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Applied Economics Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2014 ii PERMISSION Title An Analysis of Abortion Demand in Pennsylvania, 2000 - 2010 Department Applied Economics Degree Master of Science in Applied Economics In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Circuit's Virtual Abrogation of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 - Outmoded Standards Threaten the Abortion Right
    Volume 30 Issue 3 Article 7 1985 The Third Circuit's Virtual Abrogation of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 - Outmoded Standards Threaten the Abortion Right Randall J. Zakreski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Randall J. Zakreski, The Third Circuit's Virtual Abrogation of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 - Outmoded Standards Threaten the Abortion Right, 30 Vill. L. Rev. 840 (1985). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol30/iss3/7 This Issues in the Third Circuit is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Zakreski: The Third Circuit's Virtual Abrogation of the Pennsylvania Aborti 1985 Note THE THIRD CIRCUIT'S VIRTUAL ABROGATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ABORTION CONTROL ACT OF 1982-OUTMODED STANDARDS THREATEN THE ABORTION RIGHT American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh (1984) On June 11, 1982, in an effort to provide comprehensive abortion regulation in Pennsylvania, I Governor Richard Thornburgh signed Sen- ate Bill 439,2 creating the Abortion Control Act of 1982 (Act).3 The Act regulates where4 and under what circumstances physicians can perform abortions, 5 and requires physicians to file reports disclosing the basis 1. See American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh, 737 F.2d 283, 288-89 (3d Cir. 1984),jur.postponed, 105 S.Ct.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Planned Parenthood V. Casey
    Preserving the Core of Roe. Reflections on Planned Parenthoodv. Casey Linda J. Wharton,t Susan Frietsche,tt and Kathryn Kolbertttt ABSTRACT. In Planned Parenthoodof Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Supreme Court backed away from affording women the highest level of constitutional protection for the abortion choice, but nonetheless promised to preserve Roe v. Wade's core objectives by instituting the undue burden standard for measuring the constitutionality of restrictions on abortion. In the years following the Casey decision, states and the federal government have added more and more restrictions on women's access to abortion. This Article asks whether Casey's undue burden standard has meaningfully protected a woman's right to an abortion. The Article begins by describing the undue burden standard's development and application, from pre-Casey decisions to the Casey joint opinion. Part III describes the Supreme Court's clarification and application of the standard in its subsequent abortion decisions. Part IV reviews the ways in which lower courts have implemented the undue burden standard, concluding that, if correctly and fairly applied, the Casey standard can provide meaningful t Associate Professor of Political Science, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey; Lecturer in Law, University of Pennsylvania School of Law (1996-2003); J.D., Rutgers University School of Law- Camden. As the Managing Attorney of the Women's Law Project, a non-profit public interest law firm in Philadelphia, Wharton represented the plaintiff-reproductive health care providers in all stages of the litigation in PlannedParenthood v. Casey, including the proceedings that took place before the United States Supreme Court, where she served as co-lead counsel with Kathryn Kolbert.
    [Show full text]
  • 75-554 ) Ann Dos Et Al
    HHtflHY Supreme court, u. s. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20543 In the Supreme Court of tfje llntteb States ) Frank S„ Beal, Et Cetera, Et A) Petitioners ) ) v. ) No.75-554 ) Ann Dos Et Al. ) ) Washington, D„ c„ January 11, 1977 Pages 1 thru 51 Duplication or copying of this transcript by photographic, electrostatic or other facsimile means is prohibited under the order form agreement. HOOVER REPORTING COMPANY, INC. Official Reporters Washington, D. C. 546-6666 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -x FRANK S. BEAL, ET CETERA, ET AL, Petitioners v. No. 75-554 ANN DOE ET AL x Washington, D. C. Tuesday, January 11, 1977 The above-entitled matter came on for argument at 10:35 o'clock a.m. BEFORE: WARREN E. BURGER, Chief Justice of the United States WILLIAM Jo BRENNAN, JR., Associate Justice POTTER STEWART, Associate Justice BYRON R. WHITE, Associate Justice THURGOOD MARSHALL, Associate Justice HARRY A. BLACKMON, Associate Justice LEWIS F. POWELL, JR., Associate Justice WILLIAM H. REKNQUIST, Associate Justice JOHN PAUL STEVENS, Associate Justice APPEARANCES: NORMAN J. WATKINS, ESQ., Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Capitol Annex, Harrisburg, Pa. 17120 For Petitioners JUDD F. CROSBY, ESO., 310 Plaza Building, 535 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 For Respondents 2 CONTENTS ORAL ARGUMENT OF: PAGE: NORMAN J„ WATKINS, ESQ« For the Petitioners 3 JUDD F. CROSBY, ESQ. For the Respondents 24 REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF; NORMAN J. WATKINS, ESQ. 4? 3 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER: We will hear arguments next, in Number 75-554, Frank h. Heal against Ann Doe et al. Mr. Watkins, vou may proceed whenever you are ready.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Reform, Class, and the Politics of Reproduction
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2012 The “Other” Within: Health Care Reform, Class, and the Politics of Reproduction Janet L. Dolgin Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Katherine R. Dieterich Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janet L. Dolgin and Katherine R. Dieterich, The “Other” Within: Health Care Reform, Class, and the Politics of Reproduction, 35 SEATTLE U. L. REV 377 (2012) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/1279 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The “Other” Within: Health Care Reform, Class, and the Politics of Reproduction Janet L. Dolgin* and Katherine R. Dieterich** I. INTRODUCTION Americans have long been reluctant to develop a system of univer- sal health care,1 and they remain reluctant about implementing the Af- fordable Care Act, promulgated in 2010.2 The United States spends more on health care per capita than any other nation,3 yet the results of that expenditure are wanting.4 Various explanations for the gap between spending and results refer to economic factors,5 special interests,6 politi- cal commitments,7 and dedication to finding private solutions for public * Jack and Freda Dicker Distinguished Professor of Law, Hofstra Law School; Professor of Science Education, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the NEW YORK TIMES on Anti-Abortion Legislation in New York, 1865-1873 Sahand K
    Penn History Review Volume 23 Issue 1 Spring 2016 Article 6 May 2016 "The Evil of the Age": The Influence of The New orkY Times on Anti-Abortion Legislation in New York, 1865-1873 Sahand K. Rahbar Princeton University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Rahbar, Sahand K. (2016) ""The Evil of the Age": The Influence of The New orkY Times on Anti-Abortion Legislation in New York, 1865-1873," Penn History Review: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss1/6 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss1/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Te Evil of the Age “The Evil of the Age”: The Influence of THE NEW YORK TIMES on Anti-Abortion Legislation in New York, 1865-1873 Sahand K. Rahbar Princeton University INTRODUCTION But could even a portion of the facts that have been detected in frightful profusion, by the agents of the TIMES, be revealed in print, in their hideous truth, the reader would shrink from the appalling picture. – August St. Clair, Excerpt from “The Evil of the Age” in The New York Times (August 23, 1871) When Augustus St. Clair elected to make a second visit to the Fifth Avenue private home of Dr. Jacob Rosenzweig in July of 1871, he could scarcely have expected his life to be in great danger. Much to his own astonishment, however, he soon found himself pointing a revolver at Dr. Rosenzweig before making a quick exit into the street.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 23, Issue 1 Spring 2016
    Penn History Review Volume 23 Issue 1 Spring 2016 Article 1 May 2016 Volume 23, Issue 1 Spring 2016 Spring 2016 Penn History Review University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr Recommended Citation Penn History Review, Spring 2016 (2016) "Volume 23, Issue 1 Spring 2016," Penn History Review: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss1/1 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol23/iss1/1 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Penn History Review Journal of Undergraduate Historians Volume 23, Issue 1 Spring 2016 Carly S. Mayer Aaron R. Senior on African Americans and Military on the Reaction of American National Intelligence During the Civil War Newspapers to the French Revolution Varun K. Menon Sahand K. Rahbar on the Statecraft of the United States on the Influence of the New York Times Congress in the Age of Democratic on Antiabortion Legislation in Revolutions New York Penn History Review Journal of Undergraduate Historians Volume 23, Issue 1 Spring 2016 Editor-in-Chief Aaron C. Mandelbaum 2017, American History Editorial Board Kate Campbell 2016, Intellectual History Leila Ehsan 2016, Diplomatic History Emma Leibowitz 2017, American History Andrés De Los Ríos 2017, European History Gregory Olberding 2017, Economic History Daniel Thompson 2017, European History Michael Torcello 2018, American History Alex Weissfisch 2018, Diplomatic History Editor-in-Chief Emeritus Taylor Evensen 2016, Diplomatic History ABOUT THE REVIEW Founded in 1991, the Penn History Review is a journal for undergraduate historical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Medical Assistance Pays for Abortions for Rape Survivors
    What if I have to travel Where can I call to get help? If you to get an abortion? CHOICE 215-985-3300 Medical Assistance is required to pay toll-free: 800-848-3367 have been a patient’s transportation expenses to en español: 215-985-3350 any medical service that is being paid Call for help with doctors, clinics, or Medicaid HMOs. for by Medical Assistance. raped… Greater Philadelphia Women’s Medical Fund Each county has a Medical Assistance 215-772-0602 Transportation Program. In Philadelphia, Call for no-interest loans for abortions call WHEELS 215-563-2000. in southeastern Pennsylvania. In other counties, call your Managed Pennsylvania Care Organization or County National Abortion Federation Hotline 1-800-772-9100 Medical Assistance Assistance Office. Call for no-interest loans for abortions For legal help in getting Medical outside of southeastern Pennsylvania. pays for abortions Assistance from DPW or for help in Women’s Law Project getting Medical Assistance to pay for 215-928-9801 / 412-227-0301 for rape survivors. transportation to medical care, call Call for legal assistance with abortion. Welfare Law Line 215-227-6485 Community Legal Services 215-227-2400 CHOICE Greater Philadelphia Women’s Medical Fund Women’s Law Project With assistance from the Institute for Reproductive Health Access of the NARAL-NY Foundation November 2002 When does Medical Assistance* pay for abortion in Pennsylvania? • When you are pregnant from rape or incest • When you need an abortion to save your life What is rape? How long does it take to get a What if I don’t know the name Medical Assistance abortion? of the rapist or the exact date Rape is when someone has sex with you: it happened? • by force (hitting, kicking, using a You should start the process as soon weapon on you) as you know you are pregnant and are You don’t need to know his name sure of your decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Undue Burden Analysis in Constitutional Doctrine Alan Brownstein
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 45 | Issue 4 Article 7 1-1994 How Rights Are Infringed: The Role of Undue Burden Analysis in Constitutional Doctrine Alan Brownstein Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Alan Brownstein, How Rights Are Infringed: The Role of Undue Burden Analysis in Constitutional Doctrine, 45 Hastings L.J. 867 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol45/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Rights Are Infringed: The Role of Undue Burden Analysis in Constitutional Doctrine by ALAN BROWNSTEIN* Introduction The conventional understanding of fundamental rights in consti- tutional law recognizes three distinct conceptual issues. First, there is the question of whether a right exists. Second, it must be determined whether the right has been infringed. Third, there is the problem of whether any infringement can be justified. Typically, each of these issues has its own frame of reference that requires an independent inquiry. In identifying a right and defining its scope, the inquiry is directed at the nature of (and, perhaps, the mo- tive behind) the actions of the individual that constitute the exercise of the right. Thus, we ask whether a person has the right to distribute leaflets on a street corner' or to ingest peyote during a religious cere- mony.2 Resolving the question of whether particular behavior in- volves the exercise of a right is a complex undertaking involving historical, political, and philosophical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 State of Abortion in Pennsylvania
    PFI Briefing - 2020 State of Abortion in Pennsylvania PFI BRIEFING 2020 State of Abortion in Pennsylvania It is outrageous that Governor Tom Wolf has made abortion and Key Points Planned Parenthood his priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1. 30,000 babies are aborted in Despite the need for all available medical resources to be used for Pennsylvania every year, with essential medical procedures, Wolf allowed Planned Parenthood Planned Parenthood positioned – the state’s largest abortion business – to use medical supplies to profit millions from 15,000+ of those abortions annually. for elective abortions. Women were unable to get mammogram Estimates show they performed screenings. Cancer surgeries were postponed. But abortions – they over 1,700 abortions during a never stopped. six-week government shutdown of all elective surgeries due to COVID-19. 2. Pennsylvania’s largest abortion- by-volume facilities in PA are failing state health inspections, including failure to report child sex abuse and failure to obtain parental consent. Sixty percent (60%) of Planned Parenthood abortion facilities in PA failed a health inspection in 2019. 3. Taxpayers should not be forced to fund an organization that directly profits from the increased sale of abortions and spends millions to lobby for pro-abortion politics. Now, Governor Wolf wants to give an additional $3 million of your tax dollars to Planned Parenthood. Not on our watch. For additional information: pafamily.org/stateofabortion PFI Briefing - 2020 State of Abortion in Pennsylvania Sadly, 2020 has been a significant growth year for “Abortion, Inc.” in Pennsylvania. Although Planned Parenthood closed 16 clinics statewide over the previous 10 years, it has now expanded its Wilkes-Barre facility to perform abortions on-site.
    [Show full text]