DOCSLIB.ORG

Evesham 1265

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evesham 1265 English Heritage Battlefield Report: Evesham 1265 Evesham (4 August 1265) Parish: Evesham, Norton and Lenchwick District: Wychavon County: Hereford and Worcester Grid ref: SP039452 Historical Context The Battle of Evesham was part of that period of instability and civil conflict which characterised the years 1258-1267, and which later became known as the Barons' Wars. Simon de Montfort's victory over Henry III and his son Prince Edward at Lewes in May 1264 did not bring lasting peace. Simon's government was threatened by rebellion on the Welsh marches, by the defection of his own followers, and by the escape from captivity of Prince Edward. After his escape from Hereford on 28 May 1265, Edward lost no time in coming to a military arrangement with Gilbert de Clare, de Montfort's erstwhile ally, and with William de Valence and John de Warenne. Assembling a considerable army, Edward and Clare moved against de Montfort at Hereford, seeking to block his passage eastwards across the River Severn. Edward first took Worcester and then advanced on Gloucester, capturing the town, but not at first the castle, in the second week of June. Thus denied his preferred route across the Severn, Simon struck south to Monmouth with the eventual hope of crossing the river at Bristol. Frustrated by the destruction of much of the shipping required for his army to cross the Severn, de Montfort returned to Hereford. There the strategic situation began to swing in his favour for his son, Simon, was advancing west from London with an army which threatened Edward and Clare's freedom of movement on the east bank of the Severn. Although young Simon's progress was hesitant as he moved first to Winchester, then to Oxford and Northampton, he had reached Kenilworth by the end of July. His maneouvres had succeeded in relieving the pressure on his father for Edward had been forced to look to the defence of Worcester. Edward was also now the potential victim of a pincer movement by young Simon advancing on Worcester from Kenilworth, and de Montfort advancing from Hereford. To forestall this possibility Edward feinted towards Shrewsbury with a mounted force, and then fell upon young Simon's army in its tents at Kenilworth at dawn on 2 August. Edward's victory was short and sharp and for the moment the ability of Simon's army to participate in the campaign was disrupted. Simon had part of his army safely within the castle and these troops survived the attack of Edward's lightly equipped force with little difficulty. We do not know, however, how large was Simon's remaining force. Returning in triumph to Worcester, Edward prepared to deal with de Montfort who was now once more on the east bank of the Severn and who, by the morning of 4 August, had reached Evesham. © English Heritage 1995 1 English Heritage Battlefield Report: Evesham 1265 Location and Description of the Battlefield. There is no dispute as to the general location of the Battle of Evesham. While Simon rested his army in Evesham on the morning of 4 August 1265, the Marcher army, by now deployed in three divisions led by Earl Gilbert, Roger de Mortimer, and Edward, was mounting the northern slopes of Green Hill barely a mile to the north of the town. The point at which the Marchers probably climbed the hill was near to a place named 'Siveldeston'. The name was derived from an ancient stone ('Siflæd's stone') located by the eleventh century on the 'salt street' which delineated Evesham's northern boundary or that of the abbey lands. The stone was positioned1 on what is now Blayneys Lane near to the point at which the lane becomes a path as it meets the course of the dismantled railway line close to the banks of the River Avon. The spot was some 800 yards to the east of the crossroads on the crest of Green Hill where, in the words of William Tindal: 'just on the northern edge of the old road leading down to the river, a stone of about six feet in height, and apparently squared by art, is fixed to the ground....The place abd figure of this stone have occasioned many to suppose it a memorial of the battle, and it has even, as I have heard, been described and engraved as such.'2 The stone was removed at some date before Tindal's death in 1804. While Siflæd's stone can be used as a general reference to the location of the Battlefield it does not pinpoint the scene of the clash between Simon's troops and those of Edward. For this many writers have turned to a site known as 'Battle well'. Very soon after the battle a cult of Simon and his dead supporters as miracle workers grew up and the scene of the Earl's death on the battlefield, together with his first tomb in the abbey church, became places of pilgrimage. In 1266, according to the monks of Evesham Abbey, a spring was discovered in miraculous circumstances by Piers of Saltmarsh close to the site of Simon's death. Earl Simon's well, as it became known, was soon the haunt of pilgrims seeking a cure from its waters and by 1448 Richard Fox, a monk of the Abbey of St Albans, could write that: 'where the battle and murther (of Simon) was is now a well, and grete elmes stande about the well; there is over the well an hovel of stone, and a crucifix and Mary and John'.3 By 1457 the site had become known, at least locally, as Battle well and it was marked as such on the first Ordnance Survey map of Evesham produced in 1828. The well as marked by the Ordnance Survey still exists to the west of the Evesham-Alcester road (A435) and south of the Worcester road (The Squires), and it is reasonable to accept that it is the same well as that to which Richard Fox referred. Equally there is little reason to doubt that the fifteenth-century well was the same one that was 'discovered' by Piers of Saltmarsh in 1266. By the end of the eighteenth century the continuity of interest in Battle Well had led to the belief that its site marked the centre of the Battlefield and the spot on which Simon de Montfort was killed. This narrow interpretation was espoused by, amongst others, E.J. Rudge who argued that the Battle occurred: 'on the rising ground immediately adjacent'4 to the well. Rudge's father, the owner of Abbey Manor (built 1817), constructed an obelisk to commemorate the Battle in the grounds of his new home in 1821. Neither the obelisk nor the well should, however, be accepted as evidence that the armies fought the main engagement of the Battle of Evesham on the ground immediately to the south of the Worcester road and west of the Evesham road. The Chronicle evidence, so far as it goes, suggests rather that after the Marcher army had deployed in three divisions, Prince Edward's column took up position in the centre close to the brow of Green Hill facing south. Roger de Mortimer's column was behind Edward and to his right, while the troops of Earl Gilbert were on the Prince's left and again to his rear. As Simon marched out of Evesham and ascended Green Hill he did not discover the full extent of the enemy's strength or deployment until he had gained the brow and was almost upon them. As Edward occupied the Barons in front, Gilbert swung his men round the right flank of Simon's force and attacked it from the rear. When Gilbert's men rushed forward they linked with either flank of © English Heritage 1995 2 English Heritage Battlefield Report: Evesham 1265 Edward's column, thus completing the encirclement of the Barons. The Landscape Evolution The town of Evesham and the substantial abbey lay next to the bridge at Bengeworth, the only bridge in the area. Beyond the town the only road running north was probably on the same line as the present A435T leading out of the loop in the River Avon. Documentary evidence refers to 'East and West Fields' here which would indicate medieval arable open fields in this area. No field evidence, such as ridge and furrow, has been identified to support this, but given the era and the town close by, open fields are to be expected. The ridge along which the A435 (T) runs drops down to the Avon to east and west and there was certainly meadowland by the river. The open fields that lay to the north of Evesham had all been enclosed into regular hedged fields, probably by a Parliamentary Act, by 1827. Records show that adjacent open fields at Norton Lenchwick to the north had been enclosed by 1765 and Evesham's were probably enclosed around this time also. By 1885 the majority of the earlier hedged enclosed fields in the battlefield area had become orchards with the only orchard-free areas being around Abbey Manor Farm. Green Hill retains its position of eminence above the town, but Evesham has spread northwards to encroach upon the hill with suburban dwellings. The area around Battle Well is surprisingly rural and quiet, with views south to the Abbey tower and west towards Charlton. The old Salt Street running east to Offenham Ferry from the A435(T) is unfortunately cut by the new by-pass over which walkers must cross, (there is no bridge or traffic lights here) to the quiet oasis around the Offenham Ferry - Dead Mans Ait area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Useful Are Episcopal Ordination Lists As a Source for Medieval English Monastic History?
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. , No. , July . © Cambridge University Press doi:./S How Useful are Episcopal Ordination Lists as a Source for Medieval English Monastic History? by DAVID E. THORNTON Bilkent University, Ankara E-mail: [email protected] This article evaluates ordination lists preserved in bishops’ registers from late medieval England as evidence for the monastic orders, with special reference to religious houses in the diocese of Worcester, from to . By comparing almost , ordination records collected from registers from Worcester and neighbouring dioceses with ‘conven- tual’ lists, it is concluded that over per cent of monks and canons are not named in the extant ordination lists. Over half of these omissions are arguably due to structural gaps in the surviving ordination lists, but other, non-structural factors may also have contributed. ith the dispersal and destruction of the archives of religious houses following their dissolution in the late s, many docu- W ments that would otherwise facilitate the prosopographical study of the monastic orders in late medieval England and Wales have been irre- trievably lost. Surviving sources such as the profession and obituary lists from Christ Church Canterbury and the records of admissions in the BL = British Library, London; Bodl. Lib. = Bodleian Library, Oxford; BRUO = A. B. Emden, A biographical register of the University of Oxford to A.D. , Oxford –; CAP = Collectanea Anglo-Premonstratensia, London ; DKR = Annual report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, London –; FOR = Faculty Office Register, –, ed. D. S. Chambers, Oxford ; GCL = Gloucester Cathedral Library; LP = J. S. Brewer and others, Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII, London –; LPL = Lambeth Palace Library, London; MA = W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cymmrodorion Vol 25.Indd
    8 THE FAMILY OF L’ESTRANGE AND THE CONQUEST OF WALES1 The Rt Hon The Lord Crickhowell PC Abstract The L’Estrange family were important Marcher lords of Wales from the twelfth century to the Acts of Union in the sixteenth century. Originating in Brittany, the family made their home on the Welsh borders and were key landowners in Shropshire where they owned a number of castles including Knockin. This lecture looks at the service of several generations of the family to the English Crown in the thirteenth century, leading up to the death of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd in 1282. With its practice of intermarriage with noble Welsh families, the dynasty of L’Estrange exemplifies the hybrid nature of Marcher society in the Middle Ages. Two points by way of introduction: the first to explain that what follows is taken from my book, The Rivers Join.2 This was a family history written for the family. It describes how two rivers joined when Ann and I married. Among the earliest tributaries traced are those of my Prichard and Thomas ancestors in Wales at about the time of the Norman Conquest; and on my wife’s side the river representing the L’Estranges, rising in Brittany, flowing first through Norfolk and then roaring through the Marches to Wales with destructive force. My second point is to make clear that I will not repeat all the acknowledgements made in the book, except to say that I owe a huge debt of gratitude to the late Winston Guthrie Jones QC, the author of the paper which provided much of the material for this lecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna-Carta-Timeline.Pdf
    Date Event 6 February King John sails for La Rochelle to begin a military campaign against the French. 1214 Many of his barons refuse to accompany him, or send knights to serve in his army. June-July 1214 John’s barons from Poitou (France) desert his army. With his path blocked by the French Prince Louis, John is unable to join his allies in Flanders, and is forced to retreat to La Rochelle. 27 July 1214 King John’s allies, the Flemings, Germans and an English contingent led by the earl of Salisbury, are defeated by the French at the Battle of Bouvines (Northern France). October 1214 John returns to England following the failure of his military campaign in France that he had spent years planning. 4 March 1215 Facing baronial revolt, John declares his intention to go on crusade to the Holy Land. It is hoped that this will secure support from the Pope against his rebellious barons. 5 May 1215 The barons renounce their fealty (allegiance) to John, and name Robert fitz Walter as their leader. 17 May 1215 The city of London welcomes the rebel barons, dashing John’s hopes for a quick victory and end to the civil war. 10 June 1215 John meets the rebel leaders at Runnymede meadow by the River Thames near Staines. 15 June 1215 King John sets his seal to a draft of Magna Carta, thereby accepting its terms. 19 June 1215 The rebel barons formally make peace with King John, and renew their allegiance. 7 July 1215 The pope excommunicates the barons who have rebelled against their king.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pershore Flores Historiarum: an Unrecognised Chronicle from the Period of Reform and Rebellion in England, 1258–65*
    English Historical Review Vol. CXXVII No. 529 doi:10.1093/ehr/ces311 © The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. The Pershore Flores Historiarum: An Unrecognised Chronicle from the Period of Reform and Rebellion in England, 1258–65* Historians of the period of reform and rebellion in England between 1258 and 1265 make extensive use of a chronicle called the Flores Historiarum.1 This is not surprising, because the Flores covers the revolution of 1258, the baronial regime of 1258–60, the king’s recovery of power in 1261, the civil war of 1263, the battle of Lewes in 1264, and the rule of Simon de Montfort down to his defeat and death at the battle of Evesham in 1265. In the earliest surviving text of the Flores, Downloaded from which belongs to Chetham’s Library in Manchester, the account of these revolutionary years is part of a longer section of the chronicle which begins in the year 1249. From that point, until the battle of Evesham in 1265, the text is unified, and distinguished from what comes before and after, by the way in which capital letters at the beginning of sections are http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ decorated and, in particular, by the decoration given to the letter ‘A’ in the ‘Anno’ at the beginning of each year.2 The text is also unified, and set apart, by being written, save for a short section at the start, in the same thirteenth-century hand and having very much the appearance of a fair copy.3 Historians who have studied the chronicle have nearly all assumed that this part of the Flores was copied at St Albans Abbey from 4 the work of Matthew Paris and his continuator.
    [Show full text]
  • King Edward I and Edward II, Battle and Eastern Sussex 1272-1327
    King Edward I and Edward II, Battle and Eastern Sussex 1272-1327 Edward I, 1272–1307 by Unknown artist oil on panel, 1597-1618 22 7/8 in. x 17 3/4 in. (580 mm x 450 mm) uneven Purchased, 1974 NPG 4980(6) © National Portrait Gallery, London Edward I cannot have had particularly fond memories of eastern Sussex after his visit with his father during the 2nd Barons War before the Battle of Lewes (14 May 1264) and its aftermath (the 1st Barons War vs King John was 1215-7). They had entered Sussex from Kent on 2 May and their first experience was an affray on the Kent-Sussex border, after which a severe reprisal took place. Carpenter says, '315 archers were beheaded in the Weald in the parish of St Mary, Ticehurst, in the place called Flimwell in the presence of the king … ' After this Henry III and Prince Edward moved on to the Cistercian Robertsbridge Abbey, where they were ‘entertained’, but they demanded 500 marks (1 mark = 2/3 of one pound or 13s 4d [67p). Converted to a 2016 value one mark might be equal to £650 today) to be paid to Edward to spare the monks’ lives. The next day Abbot Reginald of Brecon and the brothers of the Benedictine Battle Abbey went out in procession to meet the king and give him a loyal welcome, but Henry was still angry and demanded 100 marks from the abbey as he said that some of its tenants had been at Ticehurst. Prince Edward demanded another 40 marks.
    [Show full text]
  • English Monks Suppression of the Monasteries
    ENGLISH MONKS and the SUPPRESSION OF THE MONASTERIES ENGLISH MONKS and the SUPPRESSION OF THE MONASTERIES by GEOFFREY BAS KER VILLE M.A. (I) JONA THAN CAPE THIRTY BEDFORD SQUARE LONDON FIRST PUBLISHED I937 JONATHAN CAPE LTD. JO BEDFORD SQUARE, LONDON AND 91 WELLINGTON STREET WEST, TORONTO PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN IN THE CITY OF OXFORD AT THE ALDEN PRESS PAPER MADE BY JOHN DICKINSON & CO. LTD. BOUND BY A. W. BAIN & CO. LTD. CONTENTS PREFACE 7 INTRODUCTION 9 I MONASTIC DUTIES AND ACTIVITIES I 9 II LAY INTERFERENCE IN MONASTIC AFFAIRS 45 III ECCLESIASTICAL INTERFERENCE IN MONASTIC AFFAIRS 72 IV PRECEDENTS FOR SUPPRESSION I 308- I 534 96 V THE ROYAL VISITATION OF THE MONASTERIES 1535 120 VI SUPPRESSION OF THE SMALLER MONASTERIES AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE 1536-1537 144 VII FROM THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE TO THE FINAL SUPPRESSION 153 7- I 540 169 VIII NUNS 205 IX THE FRIARS 2 2 7 X THE FATE OF THE DISPOSSESSED RELIGIOUS 246 EPILOGUE 273 APPENDIX 293 INDEX 301 5 PREFACE THE four hundredth anniversary of the suppression of the English monasteries would seem a fit occasion on which to attempt a summary of the latest views on a thorny subject. This book cannot be expected to please everybody, and it makes no attempt to conciliate those who prefer sentiment to truth, or who allow their reading of historical events to be distorted by present-day controversies, whether ecclesiastical or political. In that respect it tries to live up to the dictum of Samuel Butler that 'he excels most who hits the golden mean most exactly in the middle'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Edge
    The power of the edge Thomas Krijger The power of the edge The influence of the lords of the Welsh Marches on the political changes in England from 1258-1330 Thomas Krijger Master thesis – MA History 2 Contents Introduction 4 Chapter one: The meaning of the March 7 - The origins of the March 7 - Marcher Lords 8 - Parliament 11 Chapter two: Parliamentary revolution 13 - The Provisions of Oxford and the second barons’ war 14 - The role of the Marcher lords 18 - The disinherited 19 Chapter three: The King’s justice 23 - Edward, Llywelyn and the March 23 - The first war in Wales 25 - The war of conquest 26 - Quo warranto? 30 - Rights of the March 32 Chapter four: The tyranny of King Edward II 35 - Piers Gaveston 35 - Scotland and Bannockburn 37 - The rise of new favourites 38 - Hugh Despenser rules 41 - Isabella and Mortimer victorious 44 Conclusion 47 Bibliography 50 Appendix 55 Map of the March of Wales in the thirteenth century 59 3 Introduction The medieval border region of England and Wales was not a clearly defined one. It was unclear were England ended and Wales began, or as historian R. R. Davies put it: ‘Instead of a boundary, there was a March.’1 The March was home to a group of semi-autonomous lordships. These lordships were theoretically held by a lord in a feudal structure, and these lords had to do homage to the King of England for these lands. But the legal structures were different, as the Statutes of the realm proclaim: ‘In the marches, where the King’s writ does not run.’2 It is also mentioned in clause 56 of Magna Carta: ‘If we have deprived or dispossessed any Welshmen of lands, liberties, or anything else in England or in Wales, without the lawful judgement of their equals, these are at once to be returned to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Kenilworth Castle, 1125–1660
    STUDY OF AN HISTORIC SITE: KENILWORTH CASTLE The development of Kenilworth Castle, 1125–1660 “The finest surviving example of a semi-royal palace of the later middle ages, significant for its scale, form and quality of workmanship.” Kenilworth Castle as described by architectural historian Anthony Emery Timeline c.1120 Geoffrey de Clinton builds a motte and bailey on land granted by Henry I 1173–74 Henry II acquires the castle from the grandson of Geoffrey de Clinton 1180–82 A Great Keep is constructed 1210–15 King John oversees the building of outer walls and the creation of the Great Mere 1244 Simon de Montfort is appointed governor of the castle by Henry III and oversees the creation of the Brays 1266 A great siege is held and the castle reverts to the crown 1361 The castle passes by marriage to John of Gaunt and is rebuilt on a huge scale 1399 John of Gaunt’s son becomes Henry IV and the castle reverts to the crown 1414–17 Henry V constructs the pleasure or banqueting hall 1553 Edward VI grants the castle to John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland who is later executed by Mary I and the castle reverts to the crown 1563 Elizabeth I grants the castle to Dudley’s son Robert, Earl of Leicester 1564 Leicester makes extensive alterations to the castle and to the gardens 1570 Leicester’s gatehouse is built 1571–75 Refurbishments are made for the visits of Elizabeth I, including a private dance chamber 1588 On Leicester’s death, the castle is inherited by his brother Ambrose, Earl of Warwick 1611 The castle is recovered by James I 1642 Charles
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder of St. Wistan Pp.30-41
    THE MURDER OF ST. WIST AN by D. J. Bott I There is more than one ghost story connected with the quiet hamlet of Wistow, which lies off the London road about seven miles south from Leicester. As a resuln of the enclosure and depopulation which appear to have taken place in the early seventeenth century/ Wistow today is little more than the solitary church and the Elizabethan Hall, with its memories of the flight from Naseby, by their lake among the trees. On a summer's day one feels that, if the spot indeed be haunted, it must be by a gentle and tranquil spirit in spite of the scenes of violence said to have been enacted there. It is in keeping with this that Wistow Hall is now a Centre for International Christian Friendship and Service. The suffix -stow usually indicates a holy place, and Wistow in 1086 was known as Wistanestov, and in 1254 as Wystanstowe, 2 the holy place of Wistan. Behind that name lies a story of murder over one thousand years ago. It also gives rise to a problem of identification, and an attempt is made to establish an answer below. Before dealing with the story of Wistan, it is necessary to outline the background.3 The ninth century saw the decline of Mercia and the rise of Wessex. The last king of the Mercian line would appear to have been Ceolwulf I, and he was deposed in 823. The three succeeding kings, Beornwulf, Ludeca,4 and Wiglaf, who reigned in rapid succession, had been ealdormen of minor importance until they obtained power, and the Mercian defeat at Ellendun in 825 had left them rulers of a greatly reduced area.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenilworth Castle
    Student Booklet Kenilworth Castle 1 Introduction and Overview We hope you have been lucky enough to visit this historic site but even if you have not, we hope this guide will help you to really understand the castle and how it developed over time. Where is Kenilworth Castle? The castle and landscape: Aerial view of the castle, mere and surrounding landscape. 2 What is the layout of Kenilworth Castle? Castle Plan 3 Key Phases 1100s Kenilworth under the De Clintons 1120-1174 Kenilworth as a royal fortress 1174-1244 1200s Kenilworth under Simon de Montfort 1244-65 Kenilworth under the House of Lancaster 1266-136 1300s Kenilworth under John of Gaunt 1361-99 1400s Kenilworth under the Lancastrians and the Tudors 1399-1547 1500s Kenilworth under the Dudley family 1547-88 1600s Kenilworth under the Stuarts 1612-65 1700s Kenilworth under the Hydes 1665-1700s Activity 1. Make your own copy of this timeline on a sheet of A4 paper. Just mark in the seven main phases. As you read through this guide add in details of the development of the castle. This timeline will probably become a bit messy but don’t worry! Keep it safe and at the end of the guide we will give you some ideas on how to summarise what you have learned. 2. There are seven periods of the castle's history listed in the timeline. Some of the English Heritage experts came up with titles for five of the periods of the castle's history: • An extraordinary palace • A stunning place of entertainment • A castle fit for kings • A formidable fortress • A royal stronghold 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book Collection at St Guthlac's Priory, Hereford, Before 1200
    The Book Collection at St Guthlac’s Priory, Hereford, Before 1200: Acquisition, Adaptation and Use Christopher Ian Tuckley Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds Institute for Medieval Studies June 2009 The candidate confirms that the work is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been particularly fortunate in having had the benefit of sponsorship throughout my research: the first three years of study were funded by the White Rose Consortium of universities, which also paid a stipend. A generous grant from the Lynne Grundy Trust allowed me to present a paper on the priory book collection at the International Congress on Medieval Studies at Kalamazoo, Michigan, in May 2008. Thanks are due to a number of individuals within the academic community for their assistance and advice in the completion of this thesis. Debby Banham, Orietta Da Rold, Sarah Foot, William Flynn, Richard Gameson, Monica Green, Thom Gobbit, Michael Gullick, Juliet Hewish, Geoffrey Humble, Takako Kato, Bella Millet, Alan Murray, Katie Neville, Clare Pilsworth, Richard Sharpe, Rodney Thomson, Elaine Trehame, Karen Watts, and the staff of the Bodleian, Jesus College, Hereford Cathedral and York Minster libraries have all given guidance at one point or another. I also gratefully acknowledge the help of the Dean and Chapter of Hereford Cathedral. Julia Barrow’s advice has been especially valuable in making sense of a number of medieval charters relating to St Guthlac’s Priory, and I owe her a great debt of gratitude in this respect.
    [Show full text]
  • 70 Lords, Knights and Gentry the 13Th Century Sees the Start of Changes
    70 Lords, Knights and Gentry The 13th Century sees the start of changes that will come to full fruit in the 14th Century - the development of the role of the knight in the shires, the appearance of the 'Gentleman', Bastard Feudalism. Fountains Abbey Cistercians at work in a detail from the Life of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, illustrated by Jörg Breu the Elder (1500) St. Bernard de Clairveau ? Arms of Fitz Elys Land use A Glossary of Terms FEUDAL/Feudalism/Feudalize governing system of nobility in medieval Europe, relating to a fief FEUD abbreviation for Feudal FEUDAL CHARGES/Aids vassal payment to lord for his going on Crusade, son's knighting FEUDALITY regime or feudal system FEUDAL LEVY army obligation a lord needs to field a number of knights and men-at-arms for 40 days service in the kings army in exchange for land. A liegeman would go to the royal castle with necessary warhorse, armament and attendants specified by contract. FEUDAL PYRAMID king over sub-tenants FEUDAL REGIME holding to a feudal system FEUDAL SERVICE vassal holding land from a lord in exchange for military service FEUDAL SYSTEM from lord to vassal, homage and fealty, and enfeoffment FEUDAL DEMESNE ANCIENT DEMESNE land held by the king at the time of the Domesday Book. CUSTOMAL written collection of a manor’s customs DEMESNE manor land held by free or villein tenants but directly cultivated for the lord by an agent MESSUAGE portion of land occupied as a site for a swelling or house and all appurtenances FEUDAL LORD AVOWRY lord of the manor LIEGE feudal lord over a vassal
    [Show full text]