Spectral Response of Polycrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells Under Real-Use Conditions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spectral Response of Polycrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells Under Real-Use Conditions energies Article Spectral Response of Polycrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells under Real-Use Conditions Evaldo C. Gouvêa *, Pedro M. Sobrinho and Teófilo M. Souza Renewable Energy Center, School of Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Guaratinguetá, Avenida Ariberto Pereira da Cunha 333, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, São Paulo, Brazil; [email protected] (P.M.S.); teofi[email protected] (T.M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-12-3123-2777 Received: 11 May 2017; Accepted: 2 August 2017; Published: 10 August 2017 Abstract: The standard test conditions for photovoltaic modules are not capable of reproducing the environmental variations to which the modules are subjected under real operating conditions. The objective of this experimental work is to be an initial study on how the electric energy generation of photovoltaic cells varies according to the different wavelength ranges of the solar light spectrum under real operating conditions. Two modules were installed outdoors; color filters, which allow the passage of light at specific wavelengths, were installed on one of them. The amount of energy produced by the module with the filter was compared to the reference module, and the relative efficiency of each filter was defined. As a result, it was found that crystalline silicon modules do not respond uniformly to sunlight, being more sensitive to the red band (relative efficiency of 23.83%) and less sensitive to the green band (19.15%). The infrared contributes to a significant portion of energy production (relative efficiency of 13.56%), overcoming its negative effect of reducing energy generation capacity due to high photovoltaic cell temperature. Keywords: solar energy; photovoltaic cells; crystalline silicon; solar spectrum; energy efficiency 1. Introduction Most of the modern world uses fossil fuels as its primary source of energy. Coal, oil and natural gas accounted for 66.4% of the world consumption by 2014 [1]. They are abundant, easy to carry and have high energy density; however, they cause great impacts on the environment by the emission of chemical compounds capable of accelerating climate change. Widely available almost everywhere on the globe and practically inexhaustible on a human time scale, solar energy is now a promising energy source with great potential to meet some of the human needs. It can be obtained by the use of photovoltaic cells and modules, whose efficiency depends on their manufacturing process and the environmental conditions of the place where they are installed [2]. It is assumed that all of the radiation received by the solar cells is equivalent to the Air Mass 1.5 (AM1.5) standard. There are daily, seasonal, and regional differences in the spectral distribution of solar radiation at the ground level [3] that could make this assumption imprecise. The AM1.5 standard is used to perform the specification of panels in the laboratory. In addition, laboratory tests are not capable of reproducing the variations of the spectrum, solar radiation, and ambient temperature to which the photovoltaic panels are subjected throughout a day in a real installation. Thus, the panel response under real operating conditions may differ from the technical specifications obtained in tests under controlled conditions. A photovoltaic panel or module (PV) is characterized by parameters that are determined by the manufacturers under the Standard Test Conditions (STC): irradiance of 1000 W·m−2, constant temperature of the cells at 25 ◦C, and the AM1.5 standard sunlight spectrum. However, these parameters cannot be used to estimate the energy output of a module under real operating conditions, Energies 2017, 10, 1178; doi:10.3390/en10081178 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Energies 2017, 10, 1178 2 of 13 since the energy production in these conditions differs from STC due to variable environmental factors, the geographical location of the module, and the spectral response of each photovoltaic technology [4–6]. Factors that can modify the capacity of the energy production of photovoltaic modules are: the operating temperature, wind speed, irradiance, and the spectrum of sunlight, which have been studied by several authors. According to Ishii, Otani, and Nakashima [7], the operating temperature contributes between 15% and 20% to the reduction of the efficiency of polycrystalline silicon modules. The contribution of the solar spectrum is lower, about 3%. Similarly, Huld and Amillo [8] studied the effect of several variables on the performance of photovoltaic panels. They concluded that variations in the solar spectrum received by crystalline silicon cells leads to a performance variation between −5% and +2%. The influence of temperature and irradiance lead to a performance variation between −15% and +5%. The assembly type affects the panel temperature: non-ventilated assemblies such as the ones made on rooftops result in an increase in the panel temperature. This increase can be minimized if there is wind incidence, which reduces the temperature difference between the module and the environment, and if the operating regime is the maximum power point tracking [6,9]. In addition, the temperature difference between the panel and the environment depends on efficiency: the higher the efficiency of the module, the lower the losses and working temperature [6]. There are several active and passive cooling methods for photovoltaic panels, in order to increase efficiency: heat exchangers with aluminum or copper pipes run by refrigerant fluid; heatsinks with fin coolers, with natural or artificial ventilation; continuous spraying of water on the surface of the panels; and direct liquid circulation in the rear of modules with solar concentration [10–12]. The maximum power that a photovoltaic panel can reach varies according to the variations of the solar spectrum received by the component and the angle incidence of light, which change throughout the day and year [4,8]. However, the STC do not consider these variations when determining the nominal power of the modules, but other authors have recently addressed this topic in their studies. Cañete, Carretero, and Sidrach-de-Cardona [4] compared the efficiency of four photovoltaic panel technologies under real climatic conditions in southern Spain and concluded that thin-film cells show greater variation in energy production according to the seasons, being consistent with [8]. In addition, they reported that the daily efficiency of polycrystalline silicon cells was shown to be 7.6% lower under real operating conditions than in the standard test conditions due to the working high temperature. The energy production of photovoltaic systems can be estimated by the atmospheric conditions of the installation site. Different combinations of irradiance and temperature are considered in several works [13–15], but variations of the spectrum are generally disregarded. The influence of spectral variations on the PV performance depends on the spectral response of each photovoltaic cell technology [5]. In addition, the effective spectral irradiance—that is, the one that actually contributes to the current generation in the panel—is different from the standard AM1.5 spectrum used in laboratory tests of cells and modules, which covers a wide range of wavelengths. In general, solar panels do not respond to the full AM1.5 spectrum [5,16–18]. The impact of the spectral distribution on energy production varies for each month of the year and decreases as the latitude of the installation site of the photovoltaic modules decreases [19]. In addition, the spectral impact can be reduced by using a wavelength range between 350 nm and 1050 nm for analysis [20]. In the same way that cooling methods were projected to reduce the impact of temperature and increase the efficiency of photovoltaic systems, several research works have been carried out to find ways to increase energy production by modifying the light spectrum received by the panel. Some of these methods include: optical traps [21], antireflective layers [22–25], luminescent down-shifting layers [26–29] and color filters [30,31]. Landrock et al. [31] developed a solar simulator with tungsten lamps and color correction using low-cost filters. The light source was evaluated according to three parameters: spectral response, spatial uniformity, and temporal stability. The spectrum of the lamps Energies 2017, 10, 1178 3 of 13 was verified with a high-precision spectrometer and was corrected with the installation of four color filters. In the aforementioned works, photovoltaic cells were always exposed to the complete sunlight spectrum, in both controlled laboratory and real-use conditions. The influence of the spectrum is obtained through the use of spectrometers and sophisticated mathematical methods (i.e., by indirect methods). In this work, photovoltaic cells are exposed to just a specific wavelength range of the solar spectrum at a time through the use of color filters. In this way, it is possible to directly verify the effect of each wavelength range of sunlight on the capacity of the energy production of photovoltaic modules, without using complex mathematical methods or expensive measurement equipment like a spectrometer. Furthermore, PV cells are exposed to real variations of environmental temperature, solar spectrum, and the angle of incidence of light—aspects that solar simulators cannot reproduce in the laboratory. The objective of this experimental work is to be an initial study on how the electric energy generation of polycrystalline silicon photovoltaic
Recommended publications
  • Research Into Fabrication and Popularization of Organic Thin Film Solar Cells, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 55, 25-30 DOI:10.3303/CET1655005 26
    25 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 55, 2016 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Tichun Wang, Hongyang Zhang, Lei Tian Copyright © 2016, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-46-4; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1655005 Research into Fabrication and Popularization of Organic Thin Film Solar Cells Bin Zhang*a, Yan Lia, Shanlin Qiaob, Le Lic, Zhanwen Wanga a Hebei Chemical & Pharmaceutical College, No. 88 Fangxing Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China; b Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 189 Songling Road, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China c Shijiazhuang Naienph Chemical Technology Co., Ltd, No. 12 Shifang Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. [email protected] An analysis was conducted herein on the research status of several popular solar cells at the present stage, including silicon solar cell, thin film photovoltaic cell, and dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). In doing so, we concluded that the current situations provide a favorable objective environment for the popularization of organic thin film solar cells. Finally, we reviewed the merits and demerits of the organic thin film solar cell together with the major research focus on and progress of it, and summarized obstacles to and development trails of the popularization of organic thin film solar cells. 1. Introduction As the energy crisis further deepens in the 21st century, the existing development level for solar cells has already failed to satisfy increasing social demands for energy. This phenomenon is mainly reflected in the costly high-purity silicon solar panels, in the defects at new amorphous silicon (a-Si) during energy conversion, and in the limited theoretical energy conversion efficiency (around 25%) of silicon solar panels as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystalline-Silicon Solar Cells for the 21St Century
    May 1999 • NREL/CP-590-26513 Crystalline-Silicon Solar Cells for the 21st Century Y.S. Tsuo, T.H. Wang, and T.F. Ciszek Presented at the Electrochemical Society Annual Meeting Seattle, Washington May 3, 1999 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-98-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from: Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Prices available by calling 423-576-8401 Available to the public from: National Technical Information Service (NTIS) U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 703-605-6000 or 800-553-6847 or DOE Information Bridge http://www.doe.gov/bridge/home.html Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste CRYSTALLINE-SILICON SOLAR CELLS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Y.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Management of Concentrated Multi-Junction Solar Cells with Graphene-Enhanced Thermal Interface Materials
    applied sciences Article Thermal Management of Concentrated Multi-Junction Solar Cells with Graphene-Enhanced Thermal Interface Materials Mohammed Saadah 1,2, Edward Hernandez 2,3 and Alexander A. Balandin 1,2,3,* 1 Nano-Device Laboratory (NDL), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; [email protected] 2 Phonon Optimized Engineered Materials (POEM) Center, Bourns College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; [email protected] 3 Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-951-827-2351 Academic Editor: Philippe Lambin Received: 20 May 2017; Accepted: 3 June 2017; Published: 7 June 2017 Abstract: We report results of experimental investigation of temperature rise in concentrated multi-junction photovoltaic solar cells with graphene-enhanced thermal interface materials. Graphene and few-layer graphene fillers, produced by a scalable environmentally-friendly liquid-phase exfoliation technique, were incorporated into conventional thermal interface materials. Graphene-enhanced thermal interface materials have been applied between a solar cell and heat sink to improve heat dissipation. The performance of the multi-junction solar cells has been tested using an industry-standard solar simulator under a light concentration of up to 2000 suns. It was found that the application of graphene-enhanced thermal interface materials allows one to reduce the solar cell temperature and increase the open-circuit voltage. We demonstrated that the use of graphene helps in recovering a significant amount of the power loss due to solar cell overheating. The obtained results are important for the development of new technologies for thermal management of concentrated photovoltaic solar cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing
    Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Costs and Sustainable Pricing: 1H 2018 Benchmark and Cost Reduction Road Map Michael Woodhouse, Brittany Smith, Ashwin Ramdas, and Robert Margolis National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-72134 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Revised February 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Costs and Sustainable Pricing: 1H 2018 Benchmark and Cost Reduction Road Map Michael Woodhouse, Brittany Smith, Ashwin Ramdas, and Robert Margolis National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Woodhouse, Michael. Brittany Smith, Ashwin Ramdas, and Robert Margolis. 2019. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Costs and Sustainable Pricing: 1H 2018 Benchmark and Cost Reduction Roadmap. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/72134.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-72134 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Revised February 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cast Polycrystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Manufacturing Technology Improvements"
    January 1997 • NREL/SR-520-22503 Cast Polycrysta Silicon Photovoltaic Mod Manufacturing Technology Impr ments Semiannual Tee Report 1 January 1996 June 1996 J. Wohlgemuth Solarex, A Business Unit of Amoco/Enron Solar Frederick, Maryland National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Managed by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC36-83CH10093 NREL/SR-520-22503 • UC Category: 1280 • DE97000208 Cast Polycrys ..-. e Silicon Photovoltaic M e Manufacturing Technology Imp ements Semiannual Tee al Report 1 January 199 0 June 1996 ,, i i J. Wohlgemuth Solarex, A Business Unit ofAmoco/Enron Solar Frederick, Maryland J NREL technical monitor: R. Mitchell · .n.l,=•-- National...... Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy I Managed by Midwest Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy J under Contract No. DE-AC36-83CH10093 Prepared under Subcontract No. ZAI-2-11294-1 January 1997 fl I i This publication was reproduced from the best available camera-ready copy submitted by the subcontractor and received no editorial review at NREL. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any gency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any l warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, d or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Thin-Film Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells
    Thin-filmThin-film crystallinecrystalline siliconsilicon solarsolar cellscells Kenji YAMAMOTO A photoelectric conversion efficiency of over 10% has been achieved in thin-film 750 polycrystalline silicon solar cells which consists 700 of a 2 µm thick layer of polycrystalline silicon with a very small grain size (microcrystalline 650 (mV) Astropower Mitsubishi silicon) formed by low-temperature plasma oc V 600 CVD. This has shown that if the recombina- ASE/ISFH ISE tion velocity at grain boundaries can be made 550 Kaneka Sanyo Ti Daido very small, then it is not necessarily important Neuchatel 500 3 10 4 to increase the size of the crystal grains, and 10 ETL 105 that an adequate current can be extracted 450 106 S=107cm/s even from a thin film due to the light trap- BP Tonen open circuit voltage 400 ping effect of silicon with a low absorption coefficient. As a result, this technology may 350 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 eventually lead to the development of low- grain size � ( µ m) cost solar cells. Also, an initial efficiency as high as 12% has been achieved with a tan- Fig. 1: The relationship between grain size and open circuit voltage (V ) in solar cells. dem solar cell module of microcrystalline sili- oc Voc is correlated to the carrier lifetime (diffusion length). In the figure, S indicates the con and amorphous silicon, which has now recombination velocity at the grain boundaries. In this paper, microcrystalline silicon cells correspond to a grain size of 0.1 µm or less. In the figure, Ti, BP, ASE and ISE are abbre- started to be produced commercially.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Benign Silicon Solar Cell Manufacturing
    July 1998 ! NREL/CP-590-23902 Environmentally Benign Silicon Solar Cell Manufacturing Y.S. Tsuo, J.M. Gee, P. Menna, D.S. Strebkov, A. Pinov, and V. Zadde Presented at the 2nd World Conference and Exhibition on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion; 6-10 July 1998; Vienna, Austria National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Managed by the Midwest Research Institute For the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC36-83CH10093 ENVIRONMENTALLY BENIGN SILICON SOLAR CELL MANUFACTURING Y.S. Tsuo National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA Phone: 303-384-6433, Fax: 303-384-6531, E-mail: [email protected] J.M. Gee Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA Phone: 505-844-7812, Fax: 505-844-6541, E-mail: [email protected] P. Menna National Agency for New Technologies Energy & Environment, I-80055 Portici, Italy Phone: 39-81-772-3205, Fax: 772-3299, E-mail: [email protected] D.S. Strebkov, A. Pinov, and V. Zadde Intersolarcenter, Moscow 109456, Russia Phone: 7-095-171-1920, Fax: 7-095-170-5101, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The manufacturing of silicon devices - from polysilicon production, crystal growth, ingot slicing, wafer cleaning, device processing, to encapsulation - requires many steps that are energy intensive and use large amounts of water and toxic chemicals. In the past two years, the silicon integrated-circuit (IC) industry has initiated several programs to promote environmentally benign manufacturing, i.e., manufacturing practices that recover, recycle, and reuse materials resources with a minimal consumption of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Fabrication and Performance Analysis of Solar Electric Tricycle
    © 2019 JETIR March 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) DESIGN, FABRICATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF SOLAR ELECTRIC TRICYCLE 1Mr Jyothilal Nayak Bharothu, 2G.Naga Gopala Krishna, 3M.Om Sai Prasad,4G.Bhanu Madhav, 5M.Balayya, 6J.Yuktheswar Venkat Sai 1Associate Professor, 2,3,4,5,6UG Students 1Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering 1Sri Vasavi Institute of Engineering and Technology (SVIET), Machilipatnam, India Abstract : Solar energy is being a renewable and non-conventional source of energy which is also a environmental friendly and free of cost. We came to implement an idea to make journey easier to handicapped people by using solar energy to move tri-cycle. This project is about building a tricycle that is motorised and is powered by solar energy, the overall layout of this tri-cycle is economical to fabricate and this type of tricycle may prove mile stone in development of technology for physically challenged people. The main content of the tri-cycle is Solar PV panel, DC motor, Controller, Throttle, battery. In this project it is discussed that how solar tri-cycle will help to reduce the effort of handicapped person. I INTRODUCTION The depleting reserves of fossil fuels made the engineers and scientists to look for renewable energy sources. In addition, the environmental decay due to the combustion of fuel is alarming and justifies the design of eco-friendly system. India is spending large amount of foreign exchange to import crude oil even though we have abundant resource of solar energy. If we utilize solar power for local conveyance, a large amount of currency can be saved and we can also ensure pollution free environment and contribute to nation’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Polycrystalline Silicon Nanowires Synthesis Compatible with CMOS
    Polycrystalline silicon nanowires synthesis compatible with CMOS technology for integrated gas sensing applications Régis Rogel, Emmanuel Jacques, Laurent Pichon, Anne-Claire Salaün To cite this version: Régis Rogel, Emmanuel Jacques, Laurent Pichon, Anne-Claire Salaün. Polycrystalline silicon nanowires synthesis compatible with CMOS technology for integrated gas sensing applications. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2014, 61 (2), pp.598. 10.1109/TED.2013.2295511. hal-00956209 HAL Id: hal-00956209 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00956209 Submitted on 10 Mar 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < 1 Polycrystalline silicon nanowires synthesis compatible with CMOS technology for integrated gas sensing applications R. Rogel, E. Jacques, L. Pichon, and A.C. Salaun current when, after surface functionalization, the analytical Abstract—Polysilicon nanowires are synthesized following a (charged) molecules bind to specific recognition molecule at classical top-down approach using conventional UV lithography the SiNWs surface. In this way, many studies reported on technique fully compatible with the existing silicon CMOS biological sensors for DNA hybridation [4], chemical [6] and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystalline and Polycrystalline Silicon PV Technology
    Crystalline and Polycrystalline Silicon PV Technology • Crystalline silicon PV cells are used in the largest quantity of all types of panels on the market, representing about 90% of the world total PV cell production in 2008. • The highest energy conversion efficiency reported so far for research crystalline silicon PV cells is 25%. • Standard industrial cells are limited to 15–18% with the exception of certain high‐ efficiency cells capable of efficiencies greater than 20%. • High‐efficiency research PV cells have advantages in performance but are often unsuitable for low‐cost production due to their complex structures and the lengthy manufacturing processes required for fabrication. • World annual production of PV cells reached more than 7.9 GWp in 2008 (10.6 GWp in 2009), and the average annual growth rate in PV cell production over the last decade has been more than 40%. • Yet the electrical power generated by all PV systems around the world is less than 0.1% of the total world electricity generation T. Saga, NPG Asia Mater. 2(3) 96–102 (2010) Typical mono‐ and polycrystalline silicon solar cells (upper), and simplified cross‐ section of a commercial monocrystalline silicon solar cell (lower) (© 2010 Sharp). T. Saga, NPG Asia Mater. 2(3) 96–102 (2010) Production of “Standard” Silicon PV Cells Standard cells are produced using one monocrystalline and polycrystalline boron‐doped p‐type silicon substrates. Cells are typically 125 mm (5 inches) or 156 mm (6 inches) square, respectively. Monocrystalline solar cells are produced from pseudo‐square silicon wafer substrates cut from column ingots grown by the Czochralski (CZ) process.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale PV Module Manufacturing Using Ultra-Thin Silicon Solar Cells"
    A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future Subcontract Report Large-Scale PV Module NREL/SR-520-40191 July 2006 Manufacturing Using Ultra-Thin Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cells Final Subcontract Report 1 April 2002 — 28 February 2006 J. Wohlgemuth and M. Narayanan BP Solar Frederick, Maryland NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Subcontract Report Large-Scale PV Module NREL/SR-520-40191 Manufacturing Using Ultra-Thin July 2006 Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cells Final Subcontract Report 1 April 2002 — 28 February 2006 J. Wohlgemuth and M. Narayanan BP Solar Frederick, Maryland NREL Technical Monitor: R.L. Mitchell Prepared under Subcontract No. ZDO-2-30628-03 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 This publication was reproduced from the best available copy submitted by the subcontractor and received no editorial review at NREL. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D Modelling of Polycrystalline Silicon Thin Film Solar Cells
    EPJ Photovoltaics 4, 45104 (2013) www.epj-pv.org EPJ PhotovoltaicsPhotovoltaics DOI: 10.1051/epjpv/2013017 Open Access 2D modelling of polycrystalline silicon thin film solar cells Ana-Maria Teodoreanu1,a, Felice Friedrich1, Rainer Leihkauf1, Christian Boit1, Caspar Leendertz2, and Lars Korte2 1 Technische Universit¨at Berlin, Semiconductor Devices Division, PVcomB, Einsteinufer 19, Sekr. E2, 10587 Berlin, Germany 2 Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Institute for Silicon Photovoltaics, Kekul´estrasse 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany Received: 17 September 2012 / Received in final form: 19 March 2013 / Accepted: 5 April 2013 Published online: 8 July 2013 c Teodoreanu et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2013 Abstract The influence of grain boundary (GB) properties on device parameters of polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) thin film solar cells is investigated by two-dimensional device simulation. A realistic poly-Si thin film model cell composed of antireflection layer, (n+)-type emitter, 1.5 μmthickp-type absorber, and (p+)-type back surface field was created. The absorber consists of a low-defect crystalline Si grain with an adjacent highly defective grain boundary layer. The performances of a reference cell without GB, one with n-type and one with p-type GB, respectively, are compared. The doping concentration and defect density at the GB are varied. It is shown that the impact of the grain boundary on the poly-Si cell is twofold: a local potential barrier is created at the GB, and a part of the photogenerated current flows within the GB. Regarding the cell performance, a highly doped n-type GB is less critical in terms of the cell’s short circuit current than a highly doped p-type GB, but more detrimental in terms of the cell’s open circuit voltage and fill factor.
    [Show full text]