Arxiv:1212.5864V2 [Quant-Ph]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vacuum Rabi oscillation induced by virtual photons in the ultrastrong coupling regime C. K. Law Department of Physics and Institute of Theoretical Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China We present an interaction scheme that exhibits a dynamical consequence of virtual photons carried by a vacuum-field dressed two-level atom in the ultrastrong coupling regime. We show that, with the aid of an external driving field, virtual photons provide a transition matrix element that enables the atom to evolve coherently and reversibly to an auxiliary level accompanied by the emission of a real photon. The process corresponds to a type of vacuum Rabi oscillation, and we show that the effective vacuum Rabi frequency is proportional to the amplitude of a single virtual photon in the ground state. Therefore the interaction scheme could serve as a probe of ground state structures in the ultrastrong coupling regime. PACS numbers: 42.50.Pq, 42.50.Ct, 42.50.Lc A single-mode electromagnetic field interacting with a f two-level atom has been a fundamental model in quan- ω tum optics capturing the physics of resonant light-matter p interaction. In particular, the Jaynes-Cummings (JC) model [1, 2], which describes the regime where the inter- e action energy ~λ is much smaller than the energy scale ω c of an atom ~ωA and a photon ~ωc, has tremendous ap- g plications in cavity QED [3, 4] and trapped ion systems [5]. Recently, there has been considerable research inter- FIG. 1: (Color online) Interaction scheme of a Ξ−type three- est in the ultrastrong coupling regime where λ becomes level atom in a cavity. The atomic states |gi and |ei and a comparable to ωc and ωA. Such a regime has been ex- cavity field mode of frequency ωc form a quantum Rabi model plored by experiments in various related systems with described by HR, and an external classical field of frequency artificial atoms and cavity photon resonators, including ωp drives the transition between |ei and |fi. superconducting qubit in coplanar waveguide [6] or LC resonator [7], microcavities embedding doped quantum wells [8, 9], and two-dimensional electron gas coupled oretical aspects of three-level artificial atoms in circuit to metamaterial resonators [10]. In addition, theoreti- QED was discussed in [17], and Ξ−type superconducting cal investigations have also found novel phenomena in atoms have been demonstrated in experiments [18–20]. the ultrastrong coupling regime, such as the asymmetry Recently Carusotto et al. have studied the dynamics of of vacuum Rabi-splitting [11], photon blockade [12], non- a related system in a different driving configuration [21]. classical states generation [13], superradiance transition The Hamiltonian of our system is given by (~ = 1), [14], and collapse and revivals dynamics [15]. A key feature in the ultrastrong coupling regime is the H = HR + ωf |fihf| + Ωcos ωpt (|fihe| + |eihf|) (1) significant number of virtual photons existing around the vacuum-field dressed atom. These virtual photons are where HR is the Hamiltonian of the Rabi model [22], generated by counter-rotating terms in the Hamiltonian, ω0 † † arXiv:1212.5864v2 [quant-ph] 2 Jan 2013 H = (|eihe|−|gihg|)+ω a a+λ(a+a )(|gihe|+|eihg|). and they can have direct physical consequences. For ex- R 2 c ample, by modulating the atom-field coupling strength (2) virtual photons can be released as a form of quantum Here ω0 is the (bare) transition frequency between |ei and vacuum radiation [16]. In this paper we address a dif- |gi, and ωf −ω0/2 is the transition frequency between |fi ferent effect of the vacuum-field dressed atom, namely, a and |ei. The parameter λ denotes the atom-cavity cou- kind of vacuum Rabi oscillations that would not occur if pling strength, and the classical driving field has a fre- virtual photons are absent. quency ωp and an interaction strength Ω. In writing HR, Specifically, we investigate the quantum dynamics of we have kept counter-rotating terms because λ is com- a driven quantum Rabi model. The configuration of our parable to ωc in the ultrastrong coupling regime. Note system is shown in Fig. 1 in which a Ξ-type three-level that the coupling between the cavity mode and the level atom is confined in a single-mode cavity. The atomic lev- |fi is assumed to be weak and so that it is not included els |gi and |ei are coupled to a cavity field of frequency in the Hamiltonian. ωc. These two atomic levels and the cavity field mode Initially the system is prepared in the ground state of constitute a Rabi model. In addition, there is an ex- HR, which is the lowest-energy state of the system in the ternal classical field driving the transition between |ei absence of the driving field. Our task is to determine the and the third atomic level |fi. We note that some the- dynamics after the driving field is turned on. To analyze 2 the problem, we apply a unitary transformation to sim- where Ω′ = η1/4Ω is a renormalized driving field strength, plify the Hamiltonian. It is known that for low energy and the last term indicates a new coupling between |gi states of the Rabi model, HR can be transformed to into and |fi through the cavity field mode. a form of Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian approximately A further simplification can be made by exploiting res- −S by a unitary operator e [23]. Here the operator S and onance when ωp is tuned to a certain resonance frequency its parameters are defined by: defined by the undriven system. In this paper we con- sider the resonance at λξ † S = (|gihe| + |eihg|)(a − a), (3) 2 ′ ωc λ ξ ω0 ω ωp = ωf + ωc − (ξ − 2) − , (11) ξ = c , (4) ωc 2 ωc + ηω0 2 2 which corresponds to the transition between |g, 0i to 2λ ξ |f, 1i, since the square bracket term is the approxi- η = exp(− 2 ). (5) ωc mate ground state energy of HR by the transformation ′ S −S method. By the condition (11), |g, 0i and |f, 1i are res- Then it can be shown that HR = e HRe is approxi- mately given by [23–26] onantly coupled, but |f, 1i and |e, 1i is far away from resonance (the corresponding detuning is of order ωc). ω′ Therefore if Ω′ is not too strong, the system is confined H′ ≈ 0 (|eihe| − |gihg|)+ ω a†a + λ′(a|eihg| + a†|gihe|) R 2 c to the two resonantly coupled states, i.e., all off-resonant λ2ξ transitions may be ignored. In this way H′ in the inter- + (ξ − 2)(|eihe| + |gihg|) action picture is reduced to ωc ≡ HJC (6) λξ H′ ≈ − Ω′ (|g, 0ihf, 1| + |f, 1ihg, 0|) . (12) I 2ω where HJC describes a JC model in which the atomic fre- c quency and cavity-atom interaction strength are renor- Eq. (12) indicates that the system would execute a form ′ ′ malized as ω0 = ηω0 and λ =2ηω0ξλ/ωc, respectively. of vacuum Rabi oscillations, in which |g, 0i behaves as an ′ Note that HJC in Eq. (6) is an approximation to HR, excited atom in the vacuum field, and |f, 1i behaves as ′ and the difference HR −HJC describes multi-photon pro- an ground atom with a single photon. In cavity QED, cesses that correspond to higher order corrections [23– such oscillations lead to vacuum Rabi splitting [27–29]. −S 26]. Since |g, 0i is the ground state of HJC , e |g, 0i is an Note that the effective vacuum Rabi frequency here is ′ approximated ground state of HR in the original frame. λξΩ /ωc, which is significant in the ultrastrong coupling The accuracy of such an approximation has been tested regime where λ is comparable to ωc. in Ref. [23]. Specifically, if λ is comparable but smaller It is useful to go back to the original frame in which than ωc, the ground state energy of HJC has a good the Rabi oscillations occur between the states e−S|f, 1i agreement with that of HR obtained by exact numerical and e−S|g, 0i. Since e−S|f, 1i = |f, 1i, an initial ground calculations over a range of parameters. For example in state will evolve to |f, 1i after half of a Rabi period. If the case ωc = ω0 = 2λ, the approximated ground state we switch off the external field at this moment, the single energy obtained by HJC has the percentage error about photon described by |f, 1i will be free to escape the cavity 0.65%. because the atom in the state |fi does not couple to Now we perform the transformation for our system the cavity field when Ω = 0, i.e., the photon cannot be Hamiltonian H, which becomes, reabsorbed by the atom. In this way, a π pulse of the H′ = eSHe−S driving field can generate a real photon deterministically while the atom is excited to the |fi state. ≈ HJC + ωf |fihf| To gain a better insight of the physical process without S −S +Ωcos ωpt(e |eihf| + |fihe|e ). (7) relying on the approximation made in Eqs. (6) and (10), we express the Hamiltonian by the eigenbasis of HR. Let Since eS|ei = cosh[ λξ (a† −a)]|ei+sinh[ λξ (a† −a)]|gi, we ωc ωc |ψni be an eigenvector of HR with the eigenvalue λn, i.e., expand the hyperbolic sine and cosine operator functions HR|ψni = λn|ψni (the ground state is denoted by |ψ0i), in normal order up to first order in λξ/ω0, and consider the expansion |e,ni = m cnm|ψmi with λξ the coefficients cnm = hψm|e,ni.