DOCSLIB.ORG

Claim of Pottawatomies of Indiana and Michigan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claim of Pottawatomies of Indiana and Michigan University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-3-1888 Report : Claim of Pottawatomies of Indiana and Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Rep. No. 1194, 50th Cong., 1st Sess. (1888) This Senate Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. .50TH CONGRESS, ~ SENATE. REPOR'.r lsi Session. \ { No.1194. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. MAY 3, 1888.-0rderecl to be printed. Mr. DANIEL, from the Committee on Indian Affairs, submitted the fol­ lowing REPORT: [To accompany bill S. 2li6.] The Committee on Indian Affairs bas had under consideration Senate :bill 217u, eutitled "A bill :fnr the ascertainment of the amount due the Pottawatomie Iudiaus of Michigan a]J(l indiana," and respectfully re­ port that tbey have exa,mined the same aud recon:nnend that it be .amended by iuserting after the words ~' Pottawatomie Indians," in line 12, ,the following, "nor by the receipt iu full given by said Pottawato­ mies under the provisions of said resolution;" and that the }Jill so .amended do pass. · The bill reads as follows, with the vroposed amendment in italics, to wit: A BILL for the ascertainment of the amount due the Pottawatomie Indians of Michigan and Indiana. Whereas the "Bt1siness Committee" of tbe Pottawatomie Iudians of Michigan and Indiana., for thomsel ves, and in uellalf of all ot!Jer Pottawutotuie Indians of saicl .States, make ch1im against. the Uuited St.ates on acconut of various treat.y provisious which, it is alleged, have not l:een complied with: 'l'!Jerefore, Be 'it enctet .., cl by tlte Senate and House of Re1n:esentatives of the United States of Arnerioa in Cong?·e~:~s assembled, That the• Court of Claims is hereby authorizfld to take jurisdic­ tion of ~~1Hl try a.ll questions of rlitference arising ont of treaty stipulations wit.h the ·sai<l Pottawa.tomie Lndians of Michigan and Indiana, ancl to render judgment thereon; power is herel.Jy grauted the said court to review the entire question of difference de novo, an<l it shall not be e!'ltopp<,d by the joint resolution of Congress, approved twenty-eighth Jnly, eighteen huudred and sixty-six, entitled "Joint resolution for tlle reli1~f of cert aiu Chippewa, Ot.tawa,, and Potta.watomie Indiaus ;" nor by the ?'e­ ·ceipt in full given b.IJ said Pottawatomies und('r the p1·ovis·ions of said resolut·ion, and the At.torut·y-Generu.l is hereby directed to appear in behalf of t!Je Government, and if the said conrt shall decide against the Unite<l States the Attorney-General may, wit.hiu thirty days from t.be rendit.ion of the judgment, appeal the cause to the Supreme Court of the United States; and from any jndgmeut t!Jat may be rendered the said J>ottawH.tomic Iucliaus may also appeal to sa.icl Supreme Court: P1·ovided, That the .l:Lppeal of said Pottawatomie Indians shall ue taken within sixty days after the rendi­ tion of said jndgruent, and the said court shall give such cause precedence. Stw. 2. TIJ<tt Raid actiou shall be commenced by a petit.ion stating the facts on which said Pottawatomie Iudians claim to recover, and the amount of their claims, and said pet.ition nw,y be verified by any Jllemuer of said "Business Committee," or their anthorized at.t.orney, as to tbe exi:stflnce of s~ch facts, and no other statements '!leecl Le contained in said petiti0n or verification. The committee is of opinion that the court should not be estopped by the joint re~olution of Congress approved 28th July, 1866, for the rea­ ~ons set forth in the memorial of the Indians contained in House Mis. Doc. No.8, Forty fifth Congress, second session, and in the report of 2 POTTAW AT01-IIE INDIANS. the Commissioner of Indian .Affairs of April 6, 1886, written in response to Senate resolution of the Forty-ninth Congress, first sessiou. In brief, it appears from these documents, and from the appentled cor~ respondence, that estoppel by the resolution of 28th of July, 1866, woul<.l: work absolute injustice, aud thus could. not be designetl or knowingly permitted by the United States. ' The resolution of July 28, 1866, is to be found in the United States Statutes at Large, vol. 14, p. 370, anti is as follows: JOINT RESOLUTION for the relief of certain Chippewa, Ottawa, and Pottawatomie Indians·. Be it 1·esolt·ed by the Senate and House of Representatives tlj the United States of Lhnt?·ica in Cong 'res.~ assembled, That the Secretary of the Interior be, and be is hereby, anthor­ ized and directed to pay to the Cb.ippewa, Ottawa, anJ Pottawatomie.Imliaus, of Michigan, in pursuance of au agreement and corupromis1~ made witb. the ~ottawato­ mi.l3 nation of Indians so named and designated by the treaty of eighteen h nndred aucl forty-six with t.he United States, the snm of thirty-nine thousand dollars in full of all claims in favor of said Michigan Iuuians either against the United States or said na­ tion of India.ns, past, present, or fnture, arising 011t of auy treaty made with them or auy "!.>and or confederation thereof, and t.he annnity now paid to them is to be restoretl and paid to said nation in the ftJture. Said sum of t.hirty-niue thousand dollars is to be paid out of funds of said Indians, by the United States now held in t1·nst for said nation, drawing interest at the rate of five per centum, which amount is hereby ap­ propriated; said payment to be made per capita direct to heads of families, adults .. and guardians of minors, as is now required by Jaw in reference to annuities, by the· proper agent of the Goverument. ' It is not disputed that the sum provided for was duly paid. Are­ ceipt in full was given therefor, and without the asseut of Congress. there the matter ends. But notwithstanding said payment and said re­ ceipt the very fact is that a large sum is really still due the Pottawat­ omies, and the evirlence of the fact is too plain and unmistakable to be disregarded. In his lrtter of .April 6, 1886, Ron. J. D. 0 . .Atkins, Oomrnis:Sioner of' Indian .Affairs, say8 : I have caused an examination to be made of said claims as set forth in the memo­ rial contained in House Mis. Doc. No.8, of the Forty-tifth Congress, second session, and find that the said claims are well founded; also, tha.t said claiws have been re­ ported favorably to the honorable Secretary of the Interior for reference to Congress. at sundry times, namely, June 3, 1872, February 3, 1877, January 14, 1881, March 29, 11:582, and January 26, 11:584. • Supperadde<l to these fa,-orable reports is that wherein thPy are quoted and those which are here exb1bited in letters appended hereto, from the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissioner of Indian Af­ fairs. Under such a showing the reque~t to submit the matter to the­ adjudication of the Oonrt of Claims seems to your committee to be just and reasonable, and in the opinion of your committee should be granted .. Secretary Teller's letter to Ron. \V. B . .Allison, of February 27, 1883~ a cop~- of which is also appended, is an aduitional confirmation of the· righteousness of this claim . .lVlis. Doc. No.8, Forty-fifth Congress, secontl session, is hereto ap­ pended to be printed as a 'part of this report, there being no copy on :file in the office of the Uommissioner of Indiau .Affairs, and there being· need of it for reference. The explanation of the receipt by the Indians "in full" on payment of the $39,000 is found tllereon, .and may be briefly summed up as follows: Under the foregoing resolution of July 28, 1R86, as is explained by the Pottawatomies, an agent of the Government was dispatched with $39,000 to pay the Indians in full. The Indians were poor, and greatly distressed by mortgages and. debts incurred in expectation of receiving what the Government .had POTTAWATOMIE INDIA:N~. 3 acknowledged to be due. They had commenced churches and school­ houses; and their farms and improvements would be lost witllout helP' from the money due them. When the agent offered $39,000, in full of a debt, they were greatly surprise<l and alarmed. On both sides ruin seemed inevitable. The agent of the Government refused to confer with the Indians. He had but one duty to perform-pay the money anti take their receipts. The Indians were then advised by friends and counsel, and a Mr. Johnson, minister of tl1e Gospel, who was under­ stood to i)e present to aid Mr. Smith, the agent, by appointment 9f the Government, that their acceptance of the money could not have the .effect to prevent the payment of alt just balances due them, as they only accepted it upon the express condition of their protest; that this advice of_ friends, counsel, and Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michigan Genealogy Research
    Michigan Genealogy Research Michigan is comprised of an Upper Peninsula and Lower Peninsula, with shoreline longer than every other state except Alaska. The peninsulas are surrounded by the Great Lakes: Lake Michigan, Lake Superior, Lake Erie, Lake Huron and Lake Ontario, the largest freshwater lakes in the world. Early Native American Inhabitants The name Michigan is derived from a Chippewan Indian word "Michigana" meaning "great or large lake". These tribes and bands of American Indians have lived in Michigan: Chippewa Delaware Fox Huron - see Wyandot Kickapoo Menominee Miami Neutrals Noquet Ojibwe Ottawa Potawatomi Sauk Winnebago Wyandot Links to State Recognized Native American Tribes, sorted by state: • http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Links/state-recognized-tribes-in- usa-by-state.html • http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/michigan/index.htm • http://www.nmu.edu/sites/DrupalUpperPeninsulaStudies/files/UserFiles/Files/Pre- Drupal/SiteSections/UPHistory/HeritageHistory/NativeAmericanAndFrenchSettlementPatterns.pdf Find information about current Michigan Tribal Government at http://www.michigan.gov/som/0,4669,7-192- 29701_41909---,00.html. Early European Settlement 1668: Sault Ste. Marie, the oldest community in Michigan, was founded by the French. 1701: Detroit was founded. 1763: The British took possession of the area but discouraged settlers. 1763: (June 4,) A game of Lacrosse was played by two large teams of Indians outside Fort Michilimackinac at what is now Mackinaw City, Michigan. When English troops manning the fort gathered to watch the game, Indians retrieved their concealed weapons and attacked, slaughtering all occupants and burning the fort. 1787: Michigan became part of the U.S. Northwest Territory, but the British still controlled Detroit and Mackinac.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1818 Saint Marys Treaties A
    INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY PRESS The 1818 Saint Marys Treaties A. ANDREW OLSON III The 1818 Saint Marys Treaties A. ANDREW OLSON III Indiana Historical Society Press | Indianapolis 2020 © 2020 Indiana Historical Society Press. All rights reserved. Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org 317-232-1882 Copies of the four issues of THG: Connections in which the article series first appeared may be purchased from: IHS Basile History Market Telephone orders: 1-800-447-1830 Fax orders: 1-317-234-0562 Online orders @ http://shop.indianahistory.org Originally published as a four-part series in the following issues of The Hoosier Genealogist: Connections Volume 57, Fall/Winter 2017 Volume 58, Spring/Summer 2018 Volume 58, Fall/Winter 2018 Volume 59, Spring/Summer 2019 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Contents Part 1: Tribal and Euro-American Historical 1 Backdrop through 1817 Part 2: Brothertown and Stockbridge Indians 11 and Treaty Preparations Part 3: Concluding the Treaties: The Brothertowns’ 23 and Stockbridges’ Sagas Part 4: In the Aftermath of the Treaties: Removal 37 and Settlement Part 1: Tribal and Euro-American Historical Backdrop through 1817 The years 2017 and 2018 marked disinterment of remains at the site in the Initially the Saint Marys treaties were the two-hundredth year since six pivotal first half of the twentieth century. Upon tangential to my original object, but treaties were concluded at Saint Marys, assuming ownership of this parcel, my when I also discovered a historical error Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY with the POTAWATOMI September 20, 1828
    TREATY WITH THE POTAWATOMI September 20, 1828 Articles of a treaty made and concluded at the Missionary Establishments upon the St. Joseph, of Lake Michigan, in the Territory of Michigan, this 20h day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight, between Lewis Cass and Pierre Menard, Commissioners, on the part of the United States, and the Potowatami tribe of Indians. ARTICLE 1st. The Potowatami tribe of Indians cede to the United States the tract of land included within the following boundaries: 1st. Beginning at the mouth of the St. Joseph, of Lake Michigan, and thence running up the said river to a point on the same river, half way between La-vache-qui-pisse and Macousin village: thence in a direct line, to the 19th mile tree, on the northern boundary line of the State Indiana; thence, with the same, west, to Lake Michigan; and thence, with the shore of the said Lake, to the place of beginning. 2. Beginning at a point on the line run in 1817, due east from the southern extreme of Lake Michigan, which point is due south from the head of the most easterly branch of the Kankekee river, and from that point running south ten miles; thence, in a direct line, to the northeast corner of Flatbelly’s reservation; thence, to the northwest corner of the reservation at Seek’s village; thence, with the lines of the said reservation, and of former cessions, to the line between the States of Indiana and Ohio; thence, with the same to the former described line, running due east from the southern extreme of Lake Michigan; and thence, with the said line, to the place of beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT 2D Session HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES 103-620
    103D CONGRESS I REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 103-620 RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SERVICES TO THE POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS JULY 25, 1994.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. MILLER of California, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following REPORT together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany S.1066] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the Act (S. 1066) to restore Federal services to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, having considered the same, report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the Act do pass. PURPOSE The purpose of S. 1066 is to reaffirm the federal relationship be- tween the United States and the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi In- dians of Michigan, to acknowledge the existence of the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians of Michigan as a distinct federally rec- ognized tribe, to reaffirm the jurisdiction and other rights of the tribe, to establish a land base for the tribe, to authorize the organi- zation of the tribe, and for other purposes. BACKGROUND The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians consist of approxi- mately 1500 members who continue to reside close to their ances- tral homeland in the St. Joseph River valley of southwestern Michigan and northern Indiana. This area has been their home since at least the time of the first European contact in 1634. 79-006 Early treaty relationships The Pokagon Bank of Potawatomi Indians are the descendants of, and political successors to, the Potawatomi bands that were sig- natories to at least eleven treaties negotiated between representa- tives of the United States and Indian tribal governments: the Trea- ty of Greenville (1795), the Treaty of Grouseland (1806), the Treaty of Spring Wells (1815), The Treaty of the Rapids of the Miami of Lake Erie (1817), the Treaty of St.
    [Show full text]
  • People of the Three Fires: the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan.[Workbook and Teacher's Guide]
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 321 956 RC 017 685 AUTHOR Clifton, James A.; And Other., TITLE People of the Three Fires: The Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway of Michigan. Workbook and Teacher's Guide . INSTITUTION Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council, MI. SPONS AGENCY Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; Dyer-Ives Foundation, Grand Rapids, MI.; Michigan Council for the Humanities, East Lansing.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-9617707-0-8 PUB DATE 86 NOTE 225p.; Some photographs may not reproduce ;4011. AVAILABLE FROMMichigan Indian Press, 45 Lexington N. W., Grand Rapids, MI 49504. PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Guides '.For Teachers) (052) -- Guides - Classroom Use- Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MFU1 /PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indian Culture; *American Indian History; American Indians; *American Indian Studies; Environmental Influences; Federal Indian Relationship; Political Influences; Secondary Education; *Sociix- Change; Sociocultural Patterns; Socioeconomic Influences IDENTIFIERS Chippewa (Tribe); *Michigan; Ojibway (Tribe); Ottawa (Tribe); Potawatomi (Tribe) ABSTRACT This book accompanied by a student workbook and teacher's guide, was written to help secondary school students to explore the history, culture, and dynamics of Michigan's indigenous peoples, the American Indians. Three chapters on the Ottawa, Potawatomi, and Ojibway (or Chippewa) peoples follow an introduction on the prehistoric roots of Michigan Indians. Each chapter reflects the integration
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY with the OTTAWA, ETC., March 28, 1836
    TREATY WITH THE OTTAWA, ETC., March 28, 1836 Articles of a treaty made and concluded at the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, between Henry R. Schoolcraft, commissioner on the part of the United States, and the Ottawa and Chippewa nations of Indians, by their chiefs and delegates. Article First. The Ottawa and Chippewa nations of Indians cede to the United States all the tract of country within the following boundaries: Beginning at the mouth of Grand river of Lake Michigan on the north bank thereof, and following up the same to the line called for, in the first article of the treaty of Chicago of the 29th of August 1821, thence, in a direct line to the head of Thunder-bay river, thence with line established by the treaty of Saginaw of the 24th of September 1819, to the mouth of said river, thence northeast to the boundary line in Lake Huron between the United States and the British province of Upper Canada, thence northwestwardly, following the said line, as established by the commissioners acting under the treaty of Ghent, through the straits, and river St. Mary’s, to a point in Lake Superior north of the mouth of Gitchy Seebring, or Chocolate river, thence south to the mouth of said river and up its channel to the source thereof, thence, in a direct line to the head of the Skonawba river of Green bay, thence down the south bank of said river to its mouth, thence, in a direct line, through the ship channel into Green bay, to the outer part thereof, thence south to a point in Lake Michigan west of the north cape, or entrance of Grand river, and thence east to the place of beginning, at the cape aforesaid, comprehending all the lands and islands, within these limits, not hereinafter reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Resources the Wolverine State
    Family History Sources in Michigan Resources the Wolverine State Michigan History Michigan's rich bounty of natural resources has attracted people for thousands of years. Native Americans, the French, and the British were drawn to Michigan for its rich soil, mineral resources, timber, wildlife, as well as its strategic position in controlling the Great Lakes. Several Native American tribes have called Michigan "home." These include the Delaware, Fox, Menominee, Miami, Odawa (Ottawa), Ojibwe (Chippewa), Potawatomi, and Wyandot (Huron). The French were the first Europeans to explore Michigan, beginning around 1620. In 1668 Jesuit missionary Père Jacques Marquette founded Sault Ste. Marie, the first permanent European settlement in Michigan. In 1671, Marquette also founded St. Ignace. The Jesuits used Sault Ste. Marie and St. Ignace as bases for their missionary work with local Native Americans. Michigan's position on the Great Lakes made it a prime spot of contention between England and France, each of which sought to control the region. Around 1715 the French constructed Fort Michilimackinac at present-day Mackinaw City. It was originally a base to organize the trade and trapping networks, but its position on the Straits of Mackinac proved valuable from a military standpoint. Though the British technically ceded Michigan at the close of the American Revolution in 1783, in actuality, England maintained control until 1796. The copper and iron ore mines in the Upper Peninsula attracted Cornish miners beginning in the 1840s. Scandinavians and Italians miners joined them later. German and Dutch immigrants began arriving in Michigan the late 1840s, due in part to the efforts of Michigan's Office of Foreign Emigration encouraging their settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Population on the Indian Reservation of Wisconsin: Past, Present, and Future
    No. 42 NORTH AMERICA SERIES September 2000 Land and Population on the Indian Reservation of Wisconsin: Past, Present, and Future Gary Sandefur, Miguel Ceballos, Susan Mannon LAND AND POPULATION ON THE INDIAN RESERVATIONS OF WISCONSIN: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE by Gary Sandefur, Miguel Ceballos, Susan Mannon WORKING PAPER, NO. 42 NORTH AMERICA SERIES Land Tenure Center University of Wisconsin–Madison September 2000 ii Gary Sandefur, Miguel Ceballos, Susan Mannon University of Wisconsin-Madison [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] All views, interpretations, recommendations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting or cooperating institutions. Copyright © 2000 by the authors. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for noncommercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. ii iii Contents Page Wisconsin Indians during the early contact period 1 Wisconsin statehood and the reservation period 4 Federal Indian policy and Wisconsin Indian reservations 8 Current land use and reservation population growth 13 Conclusion 15 References 17 Maps, tables, and figures Map: Wisconsin’s Indians 5 Table 1: Indian land loss and land tenure after allotment 9 Table 2: American Indian migration to Wisconsin’s reservations 10 Table 3: Population on Wisconsin reservations, 1960-1990 11 Figure 1: Wisconsin Indian migration to reservations 12 Table 4: Wisconsin tribal enrollment and reservation Indian population, 1995 14 Figure 2: Wisconsin Native American population projections (without Oneida Reservation) 15 iii LAND AND POPULATION ON THE INDIAN RESERVATIONS OF WISCONSIN: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE1 by Gary Sandefur, Miguel Ceballos, Susan Mannon The historical relationship between land use and population change among Wisconsin’s Indian groups has been strikingly emblematic of the larger American Indian population.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicagoâ•Žs Last Unclaimed Indian Territory: a Possible Native
    UIC Law Review Volume 50 Issue 1 Article 4 Fall 2016 Chicago’s Last Unclaimed Indian Territory: A Possible Native American Claim Upon Billy Caldwell’s Land, 50 J. Marshall L. Rev. 91 (2016) Scott Priz Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Scott Priz, Chicago’s Last Unclaimed Indian Territory: A Possible Native American Claim Upon Billy Caldwell’s Land, 50 J. Marshall L. Rev. 91 (2016) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol50/iss1/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO’S LAST UNCLAIMED INDIAN TERRITORY: A POSSIBLE NATIVE AMERICAN CLAIM UPON BILLY CALDWELL’S LAND SCOTT PRIZ* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 92 II. A BRIEF HISTORY OF BILLY CALDWELL AND HIS LAND ............. 94 A. Billy Caldwell and the Land Granted to Him by Treaty .................................................................................. 94 B. The Land that Was Conveyed and Not Conveyed by Caldwell .............................................................................. 98 C. An Unexpected Son .......................................................... 103 D. Possession of the Land by Robb Robinson
    [Show full text]
  • The Indians and the Michigan Road
    The Indians and the Michigan Road Juanita Hunter* The United States Confederation Congress adopted on May 20, 1785, an ordinance that established the method by which the fed- eral government would transfer its vast, newly acquired national domain to private ownership. According to the Land Ordinance of 1785 the first step in this transferral process was purchase by the government of all Indian claims. In the state of Indiana by 1821 a series of treaties had cleared Indian title from most land south of the Wabash River. Territory north of the river remained in the hands of the Miami and Potawatomi tribes, who retained posses- sion of at least portions of the area until their removals from the state during the late 1830s and early 1840s.’ After a brief hiatus following 1821, attempts to secure addi- tional cessions of land from the Indians in Indiana resumed in 1826. In the fall of that year three commissioners of the United States government-General John Tipton, Indian agent at Fort Wayne; Lewis Cass, governor of Michigan Territory; and James Brown Ray, governor of Indiana-met with leading chiefs and warriors of the Potawatomi and Miami tribes authorized in part “to propose an exchange of land. acre for acre West, of the Mississippi . .’’z The final treaty, signed October 26, 1826, contained no provision for complete Indian removal from the state. The Potawatomis agreed, however, to three important land cessions and received cer- tain benefits that included payment of debts and claims held against * Juanita Hunter is a graduate of Indiana State Teachers College, Terre Haute, and was a social studies teacher at Logansport High School, Logansport, Indiana, at the time of her retirement.
    [Show full text]
  • 108 STAT. 2152 PUBLIC LAW 103-323—SEPT. 21, 1994 Public Law 103-323 103D Congress an Act Sept
    108 STAT. 2152 PUBLIC LAW 103-323—SEPT. 21, 1994 Public Law 103-323 103d Congress An Act Sept. 21, 1994 To restore Federal services to the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians. [S. 1066] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Michigan. (fig United States of America in Congress assembled, 25 use 1300J. SECTION 1. FINDINGS. The Congress finds the following: (1) The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians is the descendant of, and political successor to, the signatories of the Treaty of Greenville 1795 (7 Stat. 49); the Treaty of Grouseland 1805 (7 Stat. 91); the Treaty of Spring Wells 1815 (7 Stat. 131); the Treaty of the Rapids of the Miami of Lake Erie 1817 (7 Stat. 160); the Treaty of St. Mary's 1818 (7 Stat. 185); the Treaty of Chicago 1821 (7 Stat. 218); the Treaty of the Mississinewa on the Wabash 1826 (7 Stat. 295); the Treaty of St. Joseph 1827 (7 Stat. 305); the Treaty of St. Joseph 1828 (7 Stat. 317); the Treaty of Tippecanoe River 1832 (7 Stat. 399); and the Treaty of Chicago 1833 (7 Stat. 431). (2) In the Treaty of Chicago 1833, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians was the only band that negotiated a right to remain in Michigan. The other Potawatomi bands relin­ quished all lands in Michigan and were required to move to Kansas or Iowa. (3) Two of the Potawatomi bands later returned to the Great Lakes area, the Forest County Potawatomi of Wisconsin and the Hannahville Indian Community of Michigan. (4) The Hannahville Indian Community of Michigan, the Forest County Potawatomi Commimity of Wisconsin, the Prai­ rie Band of Potawatomi Indians of Kansas, and the Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, whose members are also descendants of the signatories to one or more of the aforementioned treaties, have been recognized by the Federal Government as Indian tribes eligible to receive services from the Secretary of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Settlement Patterns in Michigan, 1763-1837
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 8-2007 Land Use and Settlement Patterns in Michigan, 1763-1837 Ray De Bruler Jr. Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Bruler, Ray De Jr., "Land Use and Settlement Patterns in Michigan, 1763-1837" (2007). Dissertations. 838. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/838 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAND USE AND SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN MICHIGAN, 1763-1837 by Ray De Bruler, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Dr. Jose A. Brandao, Advisor Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LAND USE AND SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN MICHIGAN, 1763-1837 Ray De Bruler, Jr., Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2007 This dissertation examines various types of land use practices and settlement patterns from the end of the French era through statehood at Detroit, the Straits of Mackinac and the St. Joseph River Valley. In addition, this work describes a series of land ordinances, treaties, land office practices and acts and demonstrates how they shaped, or tried to shape, the ways people viewed the land and what they did with it.
    [Show full text]