DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY OF NEW YORK: 2011 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT BRONX BROOKLYN MANHATTAN QUEENS STATEN ISLAND NASSAU SUFFOLK WESTCHESTER UJA-Federation of New York Leadership President Special Advisor to the Jewish Community Study of Jerry W. Levin* President New York: 2011 Committee Michael G. Jesselson Chair of the Board Chair Alisa R. Doctoroff* Senior Vice President, Scott A. Shay Financial Resource Executive Vice President & CEO Development Laurie Blitzer John S. Ruskay Mark D. Medin Beth Finger Aileen Gitelson Chair, Caring Commission Senior Vice President, Billie Gold Jeffrey A. Schoenfeld* Strategic Planning and Cindy Golub Organizational Resources Judah Gribetz Chair, Commission on Jewish Alisa Rubin Kurshan John A. Herrmann Identity and Renewal Vivien Hidary Eric S. Goldstein* Senior Vice President, Edward M. Kerschner Agency Relations Meyer Koplow Chair, Commission on the Roberta Marcus Leiner Alisa Rubin Kurshan Jewish People Sara Nathan Alisa F. Levin* Chief Financial Officer Leonard Petlakh Irvin A. Rosenthal Karen Radkowsky Chair, Jewish Communal William E. Rapfogel Network Commission General Counsel, Chief Rabbi Peter Rubinstein Helen Samuels* Compliance Officer & Daniel Septimus Secretary David Silvers General Chair, 2012 Campaign Ellen R. Zimmerman Tara Slone Marcia Riklis* Nicki Tanner Managing Director, Marketing Julia E. Zeuner Campaign Chairs and Communications Karen S.W. Friedman* Leslie K. Lichter Director of Research and Wayne K. Goldstein* Study Director William L. Mack Executive Vice Presidents Jennifer Rosenberg Emeriti Treasurer Ernest W. Michel Executive Director, Educational Roger W. Einiger* Stephen D. Solender Resources and Organizational Development and Study Executive Committee At Large *Executive Committee member Supervisor Lawrence C. Gottlieb* Lyn Light Geller Linda Mirels* Jeffrey M. Stern* Pamela P. Wexler* JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY OF NEW YORK: 2011 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT UJA-Federation of New York Authors Steven M. Cohen, Ph.D. Jacob B. Ukeles, Ph.D. Ron Miller, Ph.D. Jewish Policy & Action Research June 2012 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 2 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York RESEARCH TEAM 3 Jewish Policy & Action Research (JPAR) Research Team Director Steven M. Cohen, Ph.D. Survey Director and Chief Methodologist David Dutwin, Ph.D. Director of Geographic Studies Pearl Beck, Ph.D. Senior Consultant Ron Miller, Ph.D. Director of Client Relations and Senior Consultant Svetlana Shmulyian, Ph.D. Director of Special Studies Jacob B. Ukeles, Ph.D. Mapping Consultant Joshua Comenetz, Ph.D. Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 4 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York LETTER FROM LEADERSHIP 5 We dream about the kind of community we want to create for future generations — a community that is engaging and compassionate, enriched and ennobled by Jewish values. To realize our aspirations and plan more effectively — even to dream more fully — we must understand who we are in this present moment. What is the nature of our community today? Who are we as Jews? What are our needs? How do we give back? What matters to us? Where do we live, and how do we relate to one another? To answer these questions and more, every 10 years we invest in conducting a comprehensive study of our local Jewish community. It is with pride and a sense of accomplishment that we present the findings of the Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011. The Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 is groundbreaking on many levels. With 5,993 interviews, it is the largest such study ever conducted in North America, and has the largest cell phone sample ever called in a Jewish community study. While comparable to the 2002 study in allowing us to understand critical trends, the 2011 study explores new dimensions of such areas as diversity within the Jewish community, economic hardship, and contemporary Jewish expression. Since 1917, UJA-Federation of New York has upheld the highest standard of fiduciary responsibility. This study allows us to understand evolving communal needs so we can allocate precious resources for maximum impact. Through this study, we have learned that we are a growing community that has not been spared the devastation of poverty. The study also explores who we are as Jews, seeking out those New Yorkers who might not otherwise have a platform to share what they think about their Jewish identity and connections. The results of past studies have shaped our communal agenda, catalyzing the creation of new agencies and initiatives and realigning priorities. Our hope is that this data will not only inform our own strategic planning but also prove helpful to agencies, synagogues, day schools, and other Jewish service, funding, and grassroots organizations; regional, national, and international Jewish organizations; public officials and the media; and scholars, students, and the public at large. We invite you to read these findings carefully and to join us in planning — and dreaming — about the future of the Jewish community and the challenges and opportunities before us. Sincerely, Jerry W. Levin Alisa R. Doctoroff John S. Ruskay President Chair of the Board Executive Vice President & CEO Scott A. Shay Chair Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 Committee Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 6 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 We are grateful to the many individuals who gave their time, expertise, and financial support to the Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011. The study was underwritten by generous legacies and bequests left to UJA-Federation of New York. Special thanks are given to the Jean and Albert Nerken Population Study Fund for its continuing support. Additional support came from the Green Charitable Foundation, the Kroll Kids Foundation, Scott and Susan Shay, David and Patricia B. Silvers, and Nicki and Harold Tanner. The members of the Jewish Community Study Committee provided policy oversight to the study with careful deliberation over the past several years. From selecting the research team to considering community input and vetting the development of the survey questions, they sought to ensure that the study would be of the highest quality possible for meeting the information needs of our community. We extend our gratitude particularly to Scott Shay, chair of the committee, who demonstrated both thoughtful and passionate leadership toward obtaining policy-relevant data to inform decision making. We also thank committee member David Silvers for chairing our efforts to raise funds to supplement the core support provided by UJA-Federation. We are grateful for the Jewish Policy & Action Research (JPAR) research team’s dedication, professionalism, and passion for this project, as well as their expertise. This study benefited from the wisdom developed by their extensive experience with Jewish community research both here in New York and around the country. We learned a tremendous amount from one another as we sought to achieve and surpass standards for such studies. In addition to the team listed on page 3, we acknowledge SSRS Research Director Robyn Rapoport for overseeing the fielding of the survey, as well as Mindy Schimmel, Eitan Melchior, and Marcie Yoselevsky for their help as research assistants. Steven M. Cohen led JPAR’s work with great zeal and intensity of focus. We particularly wish to acknowledge the members of our Technical Advisory Group, whose guidance and counsel on questions of methodology and other technical matters that arose over the course of the study were critically important to the success of this study. Sid Groeneman, Ph.D. Ilene Marcus, MPA, MSW Joseph Salvo, Ph.D. Laurence Kotler-Berkowitz, Ph.D. David Marker, Ph.D. Elizabeth Schnur, Ph.D. Gary Langer David Pollock Audrey Weiner, DSW, MPH Thank you also to the more than 300 lay and professional leaders of UJA-Federation, beneficiary agencies, local synagogues, grassroots organizations, and community activists who participated in meetings held during the study’s preparation phase to weigh in on issues that were most pressing for the study to illuminate. Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 Carrying out a project of this scope also required collaboration and support from many colleagues throughout UJA-Federation. In Marketing & Communications: Laura Sirowitz, Noel Rubinton, Reisha Goldman, Michael Losardo, Eric Steinmetz, Kelly Waggoner, and Hillary Waxman. In Resource Development: Courtney Weinstein and Jessica Chait. In our Legal Department: Stephanie Guberman. Thank you also to former project coordinator Jessica Ingram for her support. Overseeing and coordinating the entire endeavor, Jennifer Rosenberg and Lyn Light Geller’s dedication, thoughtfulness, and attention to detail kept this complex endeavor on track and of the highest quality. We express deep gratitude to them and to Alisa Rubin Kurshan, whose leadership was invaluable. Finally, the study could not have been completed without the dozens of interviewers and thousands of interviewees who completed the survey. The dedication, perseverance, and professionalism of the interviewers helped secure high cooperation rates and complete this largest-ever study of a North American Jewish community on time and on budget. The cooperative spirit of nearly 6,000 respondents enabled us to collect high-quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Languages of the Jews: a Sociolinguistic History Bernard Spolsky Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-05544-5 - The Languages of the Jews: A Sociolinguistic History Bernard Spolsky Index More information Index Abu El-Haj, Nadia, 178 Alliance Israélite Universelle, 128, 195, 197, Afrikaans, 15, 243 238, 239, 242, 256 learned by Jews, 229 Almohads, 115 Afrikaaners forced conversions, 115 attitude to Jews, 229 Granada, 139 Afro-Asiatic persecution, 115, 135, 138 language family, 23 alphabet Agudath Israel, 252 Hebrew, 30 Yiddish, 209 Alsace, 144 Ahaz, 26, 27 became French, 196 Akkadian, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 36, 37, expulsion, 125 39, 52 Alsace and Lorraine borrowings, 60 Jews from East, 196 Aksum, 91 al-Yahūdiyya, 85 al-Andalus, 105, 132, 133 Amarna, 19 emigration, 135 American English Jews a minority, 133 Yiddish influence, 225 Jews’ languages, 133 Amharic, 5, 8, 9, 90, 92 languages, 136 Amoraim, 60 Aleppo, 102 Amsterdam emigration, 225 Jewish publishing, 169 Jewish Diasporas, 243 Jewish settlement, 198 Jewish settlement, 243 multilingualism, 31 Alexander the Great, 46 Anglo-Israelite beliefs, 93 Alexandria, 47, 59, 103 anti-language, 44 Hebrew continuity, 48 Antiochus, 47, 56 Jews, 103 Antipas, 119 Alfonso X, 137 Antwerp Algeria, 115 Anusim, 199 consistories, 236 multilingualism, 199 emigration, 197, 236, 237 Yiddish maintained, 199 French rule, 234 Antwerpian Brabantic, 18 French schools, 236 Anusim, 132, 139, 232 Jews acquire French, 236 Algeria, 115 Vichy policy, 236 Belgium, 199 342 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-05544-5 -
    [Show full text]
  • Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report
    Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report: January 2019 to Present November 15, 2020 (Updated 02/22/2021) Prepared By: Rob Goldberg, Senior Director, Legislative Affairs [email protected] The following is a compilation of recent threat incidents, at home or abroad, targeting Jews and Jewish institutions (and other faith-based organization) that have been reported in the public record. When completing the Threat section of the IJ (Part III. Risk): ▪ First Choice: Describe specific terror (or violent homegrown extremist) incidents, threats, hate crimes, and/or related vandalism, trespass, intimidation, or destruction of property that have targeted its property, membership, or personnel. This may also include a specific event or circumstance that impacted an affiliate or member of the organization’s system or network. ▪ Second Choice: Report on known incidents/threats that have occurred in the community and/or State where the organization is located. ▪ Third Choice: Reference the public record regarding incidents/threats against similar or like institutions at home or abroad. Since there is limited working space in the IJ, the sub-applicant should be selective in choosing appropriate examples to incorporate into the response: events that are most recent, geographically proximate, and closely related to their type or circumstance of their organization or are of such magnitude or breadth that they create a significant existential threat to the Jewish community at large. I. Overview of Recent Federal Risk Assessments of National Significance Summary The following assessments underscore the persistent threat of lethal violence and hate crimes against the Jewish community and other faith- and community-based institutions in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 Newsletter
    Newsletter WILLIAMS G RADUATE PROGRAM IN THE HISTORY OF A RT OFFERED IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CLARK ACADEMIC YEAR 2010–11 Newsletter ••••• 1 1 CLASS OF 1955 MEMORIAL PROFESSOR OF ART MARC GOTLIEB Letter from the Director Greetings from Williamstown! Our New features of the program this past year include an alumni now number well over 400 internship for a Williams graduate student at the High Mu- going back nearly 40 years, and we seum of Art. Many thanks to Michael Shapiro, Philip Verre, hope this newsletter both brings and all the High staff for partnering with us in what promises back memories and informs you to serve as a key plank in our effort to expand opportuni- of our recent efforts to keep the ties for our graduate students in the years to come. We had a thrilling study-trip to Greece last January with the kind program academically healthy and participation of Elizabeth McGowan; coming up we will be indeed second to none. To our substantial community of alumni heading to Paris, Rome, and Naples. An ambitious trajectory we must add the astonishingly rich constellation of art histori- to be sure, and in Rome and Naples in particular we will be ans, conservators, and professionals in related fields that, for a exploring 16th- and 17th-century art—and perhaps some brief period, a summer, or on a permanent basis, make William- sense of Rome from a 19th-century point of view, if I am al- stown and its vicinity their home. The atmosphere we cultivate is lowed to have my way.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation
    Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Rachel Steindel Burdin ∼6 6 Graduate Program in Linguistics The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Professor Brian D. Joseph, Advisor Professor Cynthia G. Clopper Professor Donald Winford c Rachel Steindel Burdin, 2016 Abstract Intonation has long been noted as a salient feature of American Jewish English speech (Weinreich, 1956); however, there has not been much systematic study of how, exactly Jewish English intonation is distinct, and to what extent Yiddish has played a role in this distinctness. This dissertation examines the impact of Yiddish on Jewish English intonation in the Jewish community of Dayton, Ohio, and how features of Yiddish intonation are used in Jewish English. 20 participants were interviewed for a production study. The participants were balanced for gender, age, religion (Jewish or not), and language background (whether or not they spoke Yiddish in addition to English). In addition, recordings were made of a local Yiddish club. The production study revealed differences in both the form and function in Jewish English, and that Yiddish was the likely source for that difference. The Yiddish-speaking participants were found to both have distinctive productions of rise-falls, including higher peaks, and a wider pitch range, in their Yiddish, as well as in their English produced during the Yiddish club meetings. The younger Jewish English participants also showed a wider pitch range in some situations during the interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Distinctiveness and Ethnic Identity Among 1.5 and Second- Generation Russian-Speaking Jewish Immigrants in Germany and the U.S
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 Group Distinctiveness and Ethnic Identity Among 1.5 and Second- generation Russian-speaking Jewish Immigrants in Germany and the U.S. Jay (Koby) Oppenheim The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3256 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] GROUP DISTINCTIVENESS AND ETHNIC IDENTITY AMONG 1.5 AND SECOND-GENERATION RUSSIAN-SPEAKING JEWISH IMMIGRANTS IN GERMANY AND THE U.S. by JAY JOSHUA OPPENHEIM A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 1 © 2019 JAY JOSHUA OPPENHEIM All Rights Reserved ii Group Distinctiveness and Ethnic Identity among 1.5 and Second-generation Russian- speaking Jewish Immigrants in Germany and the U.S. by Jay Joshua Oppenheim This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Richard Alba Chair of Examining Committee Date Lynn Chancer Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Richard Alba Nancy Foner Philip Kasinitz THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Group Distinctiveness and Ethnic Identity among 1.5 and Second-generation Russian- speaking Jewish Immigrants in Germany and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communal Life of the Sephardic Jews in New York City.Pdf
    LOUIS M. HACKER SEPHARDIC JEWS IN NEW YORK CITY not having the slightest desire in the amend the federal acts would be to tween Sephardim and Ashkenazim Aegean. It must be apparent, then, world of becoming acquainted with have everything relating to the pre­ are more or less familiar; their beai-- that language difficulties stand as the police powers of either state or vention of conception stricken out of ing upon the separatism typical of insuperable obstacles in the path of a federal governments, the average the obscenity laws; another way * the life of the Oriental Jew will at common understanding between Se­ doctor and druggist are quite wary would be by permissive statute ex­ once be grasped. It is common phardim and Ashkenazim—at least, of the whole subject. The federal empting from their provisions the knowledge that the Sephardim speak of the first immigrant generations. laws, however, apply not only to the medical and public health professions Hebrew with a slightly different ac­ The habits of the life of the Se­ article or agent used in the prevent­ in the discharge of their duties. If cent, employ synagogue chants which phardim and their general psychology ion of conception, but also to all in­ the former method were adopted it may be described as Oriental in tone present other reasons for the exist­ formation on the subject. Such being would in effect throw the mails and rather than Germanic or Slavic, and ence of a real separatism. Coming the case, it is not possible for a doctor common carriers in interstate com­ have incorporated into their prayer- from the Levant as they have, the Se­ to obtain books dealing with the sci­ merce wide open to the advertisement bocks many liturgical poems unfamil­ phardim have brought a mode of life entific side of Birth Control, nor can and sale of spurious contraceptive in­ iar to the Ashkenazic ritual.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of US Jews 2013, Background and Codebook
    PEW RESEARCH CENTER’S RELIGION & PUBLIC LIFE PROJECT 2013 SURVEY OF U.S. JEWS BACKGROUND AND CODEBOOK VERSION 1.1 OCTOBER 1, 2014 This document provides important information for those wishing to analyze the datasets from the Pew Research Center’s 2013 survey of U.S. Jews. The survey was the most comprehensive national survey of the Jewish population since the 2000-2001 National Jewish Population Survey. It was designed to explore the identity, experiences, religious beliefs and practices, social and political values, and demographic characteristics of Jews living in the United States. Interviews were conducted by telephone (landlines and cellphones) between Feb. 20 and June 13, 2013, by the research firm Abt SRBI. Interviews were conducted in English and Russian. The survey results were published in the Pew Research Center report, “A Portrait of Jewish Americans.” There are two datasets analysts may use, a respondent dataset (where there is one row per respondent) and a household dataset (where there is one row per person in the sampled households). The former dataset includes all of the information collected as part of the survey. The latter is a re-shaped version of the respondent dataset that includes a limited number of variables describing the demographic characteristics and Jewish status of all of the people in the surveyed households. The respondent dataset was used to estimate the prevalence of attitudes, beliefs, practices, and experiences of Jews in the United States. The respondent dataset consists of 35,929 cases, reflecting the 35,929 unique respondents who were interviewed as part of the survey and who were either eligible for the long survey administered to self-identified Jews and people who were raised Jewish or had a Jewish parent, or who were deemed ineligible for the long interview but received a short series of demographic questions to facilitate weighting the data.
    [Show full text]
  • “Brothers and Sisters of Work and Need”: the Bundist Newspaper Unzer Tsayt and Its Role in New York City, 1941-1944
    “Brothers and Sisters of Work and Need”: The Bundist Newspaper Unzer Tsayt and its Role in New York City, 1941-1944 Saul Hankin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN April 3, 2013 Advised by Professor Scott Spector TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... ii Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One: Convergent Histories: Jewish Socialism in New York City and in Eastern Europe, 1881-1941 ................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two: The Bundist Past and Present: Historiography and Holocaust in Unzer Tsayt .......................................................................................................... 29 Chapter Three: Solving the “Jewish Question”: Anti-Zionism in Unzer Tsayt ....... 49 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 72 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 77 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My sincere thanks go to the following people and institutions that made this thesis possible: Professor Scott Spector, my thesis advisor, in particular for always encouraging me to engage more with primary
    [Show full text]
  • The Sephardim of the United States: an Exploratory Study
    The Sephardim of the United States: An Exploratory Study by MARC D. ANGEL WESTERN AND LEVANTINE SEPHARDIM • EARLY AMERICAN SETTLEMENT • DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN COMMUNITY • IMMIGRATION FROM LEVANT • JUDEO-SPANISH COMMUNITY • JUDEO-GREEK COMMUNITY • JUDEO-ARABIC COMMUNITY • SURVEY OF AMERICAN SEPHARDIM • BIRTHRATE • ECO- NOMIC STATUS • SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS EDUCATION • HISPANIC CHARACTER • SEPHARDI-ASHKENAZI INTERMARRIAGE • COMPARISON OF FOUR COMMUNITIES INTRODUCTION IN ITS MOST LITERAL SENSE the term Sephardi refers to Jews of Iberian origin. Sepharad is the Hebrew word for Spain. However, the term has generally come to include almost any Jew who is not Ashkenazi, who does not have a German- or Yiddish-language background.1 Although there are wide cultural divergences within the Note: It was necessary to consult many unpublished sources for this pioneering study. I am especially grateful to the Trustees of Congregation Shearith Israel, the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue in New York City, for permitting me to use minutes of meetings, letters, and other unpublished materials. I am also indebted to the Synagogue's Sisterhood for making available its minutes. I wish to express my profound appreciation to Professor Nathan Goldberg of Yeshiva University for his guidance throughout every phase of this study. My special thanks go also to Messrs. Edgar J. Nathan 3rd, Joseph Papo, and Victor Tarry for reading the historical part of this essay and offering valuable suggestions and corrections, and to my wife for her excellent cooperation and assistance. Cecil Roth, "On Sephardi Jewry," Kol Sepharad, September-October 1966, pp. 2-6; Solomon Sassoon, "The Spiritual Heritage of the Sephardim," in Richard Barnett, ed., The Sephardi Heritage (New York, 1971), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JEWISH POPULATION of the UNITED STATES 33 Mates, No Matter How Expert, Could Not Be Safely Relied Upon
    THE JEWISH POPULATION OP THE UNITED STATES BY SAMSON D. OPPENHEIM, J. D. DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF JEWISH STATISTICS AND RESEARCH When the American Jewish Year Book for 5678 went to press in August, 1917, the returns for the enumeration of Jews in the United States, which the Bureau of Statistics and Eesearch of the American Jewish Committee had been engaged in making, were by no means complete. As a matter of fact the work continued to extend well into the current year. This article must consequently be regarded both as a sequel and, in some measure, as a revised edition of that portion of the divi- sion of statistics treating of the number of the Jews of the United States, which appeared in the Year Book for 1917-1918. All statistics regarding the number of Jews in the United States have, of course, been estimates. The earliest approxi- mation seems to have been made in 1818, by Mordecai M. Noah, who put the number at 3,000. Other noteworthy esti- mates have been the following: Year Jewish Population Authority 1824 6,000 Solomon Etting 1840 15,000 American Almanac 1848 50,000 M. A. Berk 1880 230,000 • William B. Hackenburg 1888 400,000 Isaac Markens 1897 937,800 David Sulzberger 1905 1,508,435 Jewish Encyclopedia 1907 1,777,185 Henrietta Szold 1914 2,933,374 Joseph Jacobs. The 1917 inquiry into the number of Jews in this country naturally divided itself into two parts: the one covering New 2 32 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK York City, and the other concerning the cities and towns out- side of the metropolis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conference Booklet
    Contents Welcome and acknowledgements ............................................................................... 2 Keynote speaker information ....................................................................................... 5 Conference programme .............................................................................................. 8 Sunday 9th July ........................................................................................................ 8 Monday 10th July ..................................................................................................... 9 Tuesday 11th July .................................................................................................. 14 Wednesday 12th July .............................................................................................. 19 Abstracts ................................................................................................................... 23 The conference is generously supported by • The School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh • The British Association for Jewish Studies • The European Association for Jewish Studies • The Astaire Seminar Series in Jewish Studies, University of Edinburgh Other sponsors • Berghahn • Brill Publishers • Eurospan • Littman Library of Jewish Civilization / Liverpool University Press • Oxbow Books • Peter Lang • University of Wales Press • Vernon Press Connecting to WiFi during the conference Follow the instructions provided in your conference pack or use eduroam. Tweet about the conference #BAJS2017
    [Show full text]
  • The Dawn of Yiddish Radio in New York City
    Ir Kenen Heren Mikh?: The Dawn of Yiddish Radio in New York City By: Alexis Aaeng This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors from the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder. April 2016 Thesis Advisor: Liora Halperin | History Committee Members: Mithi Mukherjee | History Sasha Senderovich | German and Slavic Languages and Literatures 1 ABSTRACT Yiddish Radio is often overlooked by Jewish historians because of its obscurity. The availability of primary and secondary sources that examine this phenomenon is incredibly limited, making it difficult to fully understand its overall importance. Radio was one of the cornerstones of American identity formation in the 1930s because of its ability to transcend the boundaries previously set by other forms of mass media. With the passing of the 1927 Radio Act, radio transformed into a commercial enterprise with unlimited possibilities. This thesis examines WEVD, one of the most prominent Yiddish radio stations in New York City during this period. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the 1927 Radio Act was successful in its original mission of promoting public interest and welfare through radio by using WEVD as a case study. While it is difficult to judge the success of such a significant piece of legislation on such a small community, the Jews in New York were something of a special case because of their unique ethnic character. The original intention behind the 1927 Radio Act was to create a standard to which radio should be held, and it accomplished this goal, while simultaneously reinforcing the tradition of multiculturalism within the United States of America.
    [Show full text]