DOCSLIB.ORG

Jewish Community Study of New York 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY OF NEW YORK: 2011 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT BRONX BROOKLYN MANHATTAN QUEENS STATEN ISLAND NASSAU SUFFOLK WESTCHESTER UJA-Federation of New York Leadership President Special Advisor to the Jewish Community Study of Jerry W. Levin* President New York: 2011 Committee Michael G. Jesselson Chair of the Board Chair Alisa R. Doctoroff* Senior Vice President, Scott A. Shay Financial Resource Executive Vice President & CEO Development Laurie Blitzer John S. Ruskay Mark D. Medin Beth Finger Aileen Gitelson Chair, Caring Commission Senior Vice President, Billie Gold Jeffrey A. Schoenfeld* Strategic Planning and Cindy Golub Organizational Resources Judah Gribetz Chair, Commission on Jewish Alisa Rubin Kurshan John A. Herrmann Identity and Renewal Vivien Hidary Eric S. Goldstein* Senior Vice President, Edward M. Kerschner Agency Relations Meyer Koplow Chair, Commission on the Roberta Marcus Leiner Alisa Rubin Kurshan Jewish People Sara Nathan Alisa F. Levin* Chief Financial Officer Leonard Petlakh Irvin A. Rosenthal Karen Radkowsky Chair, Jewish Communal William E. Rapfogel Network Commission General Counsel, Chief Rabbi Peter Rubinstein Helen Samuels* Compliance Officer & Daniel Septimus Secretary David Silvers General Chair, 2012 Campaign Ellen R. Zimmerman Tara Slone Marcia Riklis* Nicki Tanner Managing Director, Marketing Julia E. Zeuner Campaign Chairs and Communications Karen S.W. Friedman* Leslie K. Lichter Director of Research and Wayne K. Goldstein* Study Director William L. Mack Executive Vice Presidents Jennifer Rosenberg Emeriti Treasurer Ernest W. Michel Executive Director, Educational Roger W. Einiger* Stephen D. Solender Resources and Organizational Development and Study Executive Committee At Large *Executive Committee member Supervisor Lawrence C. Gottlieb* Lyn Light Geller Linda Mirels* Jeffrey M. Stern* Pamela P. Wexler* JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY OF NEW YORK: 2011 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT UJA-Federation of New York Authors Steven M. Cohen, Ph.D. Jacob B. Ukeles, Ph.D. Ron Miller, Ph.D. Jewish Policy & Action Research June 2012 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 2 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York RESEARCH TEAM 3 Jewish Policy & Action Research (JPAR) Research Team Director Steven M. Cohen, Ph.D. Survey Director and Chief Methodologist David Dutwin, Ph.D. Director of Geographic Studies Pearl Beck, Ph.D. Senior Consultant Ron Miller, Ph.D. Director of Client Relations and Senior Consultant Svetlana Shmulyian, Ph.D. Director of Special Studies Jacob B. Ukeles, Ph.D. Mapping Consultant Joshua Comenetz, Ph.D. Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 4 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York LETTER FROM LEADERSHIP 5 We dream about the kind of community we want to create for future generations — a community that is engaging and compassionate, enriched and ennobled by Jewish values. To realize our aspirations and plan more effectively — even to dream more fully — we must understand who we are in this present moment. What is the nature of our community today? Who are we as Jews? What are our needs? How do we give back? What matters to us? Where do we live, and how do we relate to one another? To answer these questions and more, every 10 years we invest in conducting a comprehensive study of our local Jewish community. It is with pride and a sense of accomplishment that we present the findings of the Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011. The Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 is groundbreaking on many levels. With 5,993 interviews, it is the largest such study ever conducted in North America, and has the largest cell phone sample ever called in a Jewish community study. While comparable to the 2002 study in allowing us to understand critical trends, the 2011 study explores new dimensions of such areas as diversity within the Jewish community, economic hardship, and contemporary Jewish expression. Since 1917, UJA-Federation of New York has upheld the highest standard of fiduciary responsibility. This study allows us to understand evolving communal needs so we can allocate precious resources for maximum impact. Through this study, we have learned that we are a growing community that has not been spared the devastation of poverty. The study also explores who we are as Jews, seeking out those New Yorkers who might not otherwise have a platform to share what they think about their Jewish identity and connections. The results of past studies have shaped our communal agenda, catalyzing the creation of new agencies and initiatives and realigning priorities. Our hope is that this data will not only inform our own strategic planning but also prove helpful to agencies, synagogues, day schools, and other Jewish service, funding, and grassroots organizations; regional, national, and international Jewish organizations; public officials and the media; and scholars, students, and the public at large. We invite you to read these findings carefully and to join us in planning — and dreaming — about the future of the Jewish community and the challenges and opportunities before us. Sincerely, Jerry W. Levin Alisa R. Doctoroff John S. Ruskay President Chair of the Board Executive Vice President & CEO Scott A. Shay Chair Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 Committee Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York 6 Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 We are grateful to the many individuals who gave their time, expertise, and financial support to the Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011. The study was underwritten by generous legacies and bequests left to UJA-Federation of New York. Special thanks are given to the Jean and Albert Nerken Population Study Fund for its continuing support. Additional support came from the Green Charitable Foundation, the Kroll Kids Foundation, Scott and Susan Shay, David and Patricia B. Silvers, and Nicki and Harold Tanner. The members of the Jewish Community Study Committee provided policy oversight to the study with careful deliberation over the past several years. From selecting the research team to considering community input and vetting the development of the survey questions, they sought to ensure that the study would be of the highest quality possible for meeting the information needs of our community. We extend our gratitude particularly to Scott Shay, chair of the committee, who demonstrated both thoughtful and passionate leadership toward obtaining policy-relevant data to inform decision making. We also thank committee member David Silvers for chairing our efforts to raise funds to supplement the core support provided by UJA-Federation. We are grateful for the Jewish Policy & Action Research (JPAR) research team’s dedication, professionalism, and passion for this project, as well as their expertise. This study benefited from the wisdom developed by their extensive experience with Jewish community research both here in New York and around the country. We learned a tremendous amount from one another as we sought to achieve and surpass standards for such studies. In addition to the team listed on page 3, we acknowledge SSRS Research Director Robyn Rapoport for overseeing the fielding of the survey, as well as Mindy Schimmel, Eitan Melchior, and Marcie Yoselevsky for their help as research assistants. Steven M. Cohen led JPAR’s work with great zeal and intensity of focus. We particularly wish to acknowledge the members of our Technical Advisory Group, whose guidance and counsel on questions of methodology and other technical matters that arose over the course of the study were critically important to the success of this study. Sid Groeneman, Ph.D. Ilene Marcus, MPA, MSW Joseph Salvo, Ph.D. Laurence Kotler-Berkowitz, Ph.D. David Marker, Ph.D. Elizabeth Schnur, Ph.D. Gary Langer David Pollock Audrey Weiner, DSW, MPH Thank you also to the more than 300 lay and professional leaders of UJA-Federation, beneficiary agencies, local synagogues, grassroots organizations, and community activists who participated in meetings held during the study’s preparation phase to weigh in on issues that were most pressing for the study to illuminate. Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 | UJA-Federation of New York ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 Carrying out a project of this scope also required collaboration and support from many colleagues throughout UJA-Federation. In Marketing & Communications: Laura Sirowitz, Noel Rubinton, Reisha Goldman, Michael Losardo, Eric Steinmetz, Kelly Waggoner, and Hillary Waxman. In Resource Development: Courtney Weinstein and Jessica Chait. In our Legal Department: Stephanie Guberman. Thank you also to former project coordinator Jessica Ingram for her support. Overseeing and coordinating the entire endeavor, Jennifer Rosenberg and Lyn Light Geller’s dedication, thoughtfulness, and attention to detail kept this complex endeavor on track and of the highest quality. We express deep gratitude to them and to Alisa Rubin Kurshan, whose leadership was invaluable. Finally, the study could not have been completed without the dozens of interviewers and thousands of interviewees who completed the survey. The dedication, perseverance, and professionalism of the interviewers helped secure high cooperation rates and complete this largest-ever study of a North American Jewish community on time and on budget. The cooperative spirit of nearly 6,000 respondents enabled us to collect high-quality
Recommended publications
  • Marketing Jewish Life Contact

    Marketing Jewish Life Contact

    CONTACT WINTER 2004/SHEVAT 5764 VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF JEWISH LIFE NETWORK/STEINHARDT FOUNDATION Marketing Jewish Life contact WINTER 2004/SHEVAT 5764 VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2 Marketing Jewish Life Eli Valley Editor or the past dozen years, many American Jewish institutions have tai- Erica Coleman Copy Editor lored programming towards that elusive yet abundant breed: the unaf- Janet Mann filiated Jew. Millions have been spent on new programs that promise to Administration F reach Jews who lie outside the community’s orbit. Unfortunately, we Yakov Wisniewski have often neglected perhaps the most crucial area of focus: innovative mar- Design Director keting of programs and offerings. Instead, many of us have relied on perfunc- tory marketing plans that place the message of outreach and engagement in JEWISH LIFE NETWORK STEINHARDT FOUNDATION the media of the already-affiliated. Michael H. Steinhardt Chairman Such logic is counter-intuitive. If our target is the unengaged, then by defini- Rabbi Irving Greenberg tion they exist outside the range of Jewish media. The competition for their President attention is fierce. Like everyone else, Jews in the open society are subject to Rabbi David Gedzelman seemingly limitless avenues of identity exploration and a whirlwind of infor- Executive Director mation. The deluge of messages and options is equivalent to spam – unless it Jonathan J. Greenberg z”l Founding Director is found to be immediately compelling, it will be deleted. In such an atmos- phere, strategic message creation and placement is crucial for the success and CONTACT is produced and distributed by Jewish Life Network/ vitality of Jewish programs.
  • 1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos

    1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos

    Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos: Some Tentative Thoughts David Berger The deep and systemic tension between contemporary egalitarianism and many authoritative Jewish texts about gentiles takes varying forms. Most Orthodox Jews remain untroubled by some aspects of this tension, understanding that Judaism’s affirmation of chosenness and hierarchy can inspire and ennoble without denigrating others. In other instances, affirmations of metaphysical differences between Jews and gentiles can take a form that makes many of us uncomfortable, but we have the legitimate option of regarding them as non-authoritative. Finally and most disturbing, there are positions affirmed by standard halakhic sources from the Talmud to the Shulhan Arukh that apparently stand in stark contrast to values taken for granted in the modern West and taught in other sections of the Torah itself. Let me begin with a few brief observations about the first two categories and proceed to somewhat more extended ruminations about the third. Critics ranging from medieval Christians to Mordecai Kaplan have directed withering fire at the doctrine of the chosenness of Israel. Nonetheless, if we examine an overarching pattern in the earliest chapters of the Torah, we discover, I believe, that this choice emerges in a universalist context. The famous statement in the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 4:5) that Adam was created singly so that no one would be able to say, “My father is greater than yours” underscores the universality of the original divine intent. While we can never know the purpose of creation, one plausible objective in light of the narrative in Genesis is the opportunity to actualize the values of justice and lovingkindness through the behavior of creatures who subordinate themselves to the will 1 of God.
  • A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism

    A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism

    eSharp Issue 20: New Horizons A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism Eva van Loenen (University of Southampton) Introduction In this article, I shall examine the history of Hasidic Judaism, a mystical,1 ultra-orthodox2 branch of Judaism, which values joyfully worshipping God’s presence in nature as highly as the strict observance of the laws of Torah3 and Talmud.4 In spite of being understudied, the history of Hasidic Judaism has divided historians until today. Indeed, Hasidic Jewish history is not one monolithic, clear-cut, straightforward chronicle. Rather, each scholar has created his own narrative and each one is as different as its author. While a brief introduction such as this cannot enter into all the myriad divergences and similarities between these stories, what I will attempt to do here is to incorporate and compare an array of different views in order to summarise the history of Hasidism and provide a more objective analysis, which has not yet been undertaken. Furthermore, my historical introduction in Hasidic Judaism will exemplify how mystical branches of mainstream religions might develop and shed light on an under-researched division of Judaism. The main focus of 1 Mystical movements strive for a personal experience of God or of his presence and values intuitive, spiritual insight or revelationary knowledge. The knowledge gained is generally ‘esoteric’ (‘within’ or hidden), leading to the term ‘esotericism’ as opposed to exoteric, based on the external reality which can be attested by anyone. 2 Ultra-orthodox Jews adhere most strictly to Jewish law as the holy word of God, delivered perfectly and completely to Moses on Mount Sinai.
  • Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report

    Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report

    Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report: January 2019 to Present November 15, 2020 (Updated 02/22/2021) Prepared By: Rob Goldberg, Senior Director, Legislative Affairs [email protected] The following is a compilation of recent threat incidents, at home or abroad, targeting Jews and Jewish institutions (and other faith-based organization) that have been reported in the public record. When completing the Threat section of the IJ (Part III. Risk): ▪ First Choice: Describe specific terror (or violent homegrown extremist) incidents, threats, hate crimes, and/or related vandalism, trespass, intimidation, or destruction of property that have targeted its property, membership, or personnel. This may also include a specific event or circumstance that impacted an affiliate or member of the organization’s system or network. ▪ Second Choice: Report on known incidents/threats that have occurred in the community and/or State where the organization is located. ▪ Third Choice: Reference the public record regarding incidents/threats against similar or like institutions at home or abroad. Since there is limited working space in the IJ, the sub-applicant should be selective in choosing appropriate examples to incorporate into the response: events that are most recent, geographically proximate, and closely related to their type or circumstance of their organization or are of such magnitude or breadth that they create a significant existential threat to the Jewish community at large. I. Overview of Recent Federal Risk Assessments of National Significance Summary The following assessments underscore the persistent threat of lethal violence and hate crimes against the Jewish community and other faith- and community-based institutions in the United States.
  • Noahidism Or B'nai Noah—Sons of Noah—Refers To, Arguably, a Family

    Noahidism Or B'nai Noah—Sons of Noah—Refers To, Arguably, a Family

    Noahidism or B’nai Noah—sons of Noah—refers to, arguably, a family of watered–down versions of Orthodox Judaism. A majority of Orthodox Jews, and most members of the broad spectrum of Jewish movements overall, do not proselytize or, borrowing Christian terminology, “evangelize” or “witness.” In the U.S., an even larger number of Jews, as with this writer’s own family of orientation or origin, never affiliated with any Jewish movement. Noahidism may have given some groups of Orthodox Jews a method, arguably an excuse, to bypass the custom of nonconversion. Those Orthodox Jews are, in any event, simply breaking with convention, not with a scriptural ordinance. Although Noahidism is based ,MP3], Tạləmūḏ]תַּלְמּוד ,upon the Talmud (Hebrew “instruction”), not the Bible, the text itself does not explicitly call for a Noahidism per se. Numerous commandments supposedly mandated for the sons of Noah or heathen are considered within the context of a rabbinical conversation. Two only partially overlapping enumerations of seven “precepts” are provided. Furthermore, additional precepts, not incorporated into either list, are mentioned. The frequently referenced “seven laws of the sons of Noah” are, therefore, misleading and, indeed, arithmetically incorrect. By my count, precisely a dozen are specified. Although I, honestly, fail to understand why individuals would self–identify with a faith which labels them as “heathen,” that is their business, not mine. The translations will follow a series of quotations pertinent to this monotheistic and ,MP3], tạləmūḏiy]תַּלְמּודִ י ,talmudic (Hebrew “instructive”) new religious movement (NRM). Indeed, the first passage quoted below was excerpted from the translated source text for Noahidism: Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.
  • 2010-2011 Newsletter

    2010-2011 Newsletter

    Newsletter WILLIAMS G RADUATE PROGRAM IN THE HISTORY OF A RT OFFERED IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CLARK ACADEMIC YEAR 2010–11 Newsletter ••••• 1 1 CLASS OF 1955 MEMORIAL PROFESSOR OF ART MARC GOTLIEB Letter from the Director Greetings from Williamstown! Our New features of the program this past year include an alumni now number well over 400 internship for a Williams graduate student at the High Mu- going back nearly 40 years, and we seum of Art. Many thanks to Michael Shapiro, Philip Verre, hope this newsletter both brings and all the High staff for partnering with us in what promises back memories and informs you to serve as a key plank in our effort to expand opportuni- of our recent efforts to keep the ties for our graduate students in the years to come. We had a thrilling study-trip to Greece last January with the kind program academically healthy and participation of Elizabeth McGowan; coming up we will be indeed second to none. To our substantial community of alumni heading to Paris, Rome, and Naples. An ambitious trajectory we must add the astonishingly rich constellation of art histori- to be sure, and in Rome and Naples in particular we will be ans, conservators, and professionals in related fields that, for a exploring 16th- and 17th-century art—and perhaps some brief period, a summer, or on a permanent basis, make William- sense of Rome from a 19th-century point of view, if I am al- stown and its vicinity their home. The atmosphere we cultivate is lowed to have my way.
  • Millennium, Jubilee and Human History Under God for Jews in the Middle Ages Rabbi Asher Finkel, Ph.D., Seton Hall University

    Millennium, Jubilee and Human History Under God for Jews in the Middle Ages Rabbi Asher Finkel, Ph.D., Seton Hall University

    Seton Hall University From the SelectedWorks of Rabbi Asher Finkel, Ph.D. 2003 Millennium, Jubilee and Human History under God for Jews in the Middle Ages Rabbi Asher Finkel, Ph.D., Seton Hall University This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY-NC-ND International License. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/asher_finkel/24/ Millennium, Jubilee and Human History under God for Jews in the Middle Ages Asher Finkel Jewish-Christian Studies Graduate Program Department of Religion Seton Hall University South Orange, NJ This article was published in Ich bin ein Hebraer: Gedenken an Otto Michel (1903 - 1993), edited by Helgo Lindner, 312-326. Tübingen: Mohr, 2003. MILLENNIUM, JUBILEE AND HUMAN HISTORY UNDER GOD FOR JEWS IN THE MIDDLE AGES Asher Finkel, Ph.D. The year 1240 is the beginning of the sixth millenium in the Jewish calendar. This year witnessed the Mongol invasion from the East, defeating the Germans and Poles, as well as the year that saw the new ascendancy of the Islamic power. The turn of events was perceived by Nachmanides as the appearance of the "fearsome and terrible beast" in Daniel's vision (Chapter 7) that preceded the coming of the Son of Man, the messianic figure in Jewish apocalypticism. Nachmanides1 portrays the Islamic empire as a "powerful kingdom that is closer to the truth than the former ones," referring to the other theriomorphic empires in Daniel's prophecy. Islam was perceived by Spanish Jewry to be a monotheistic faith, with emphasis on God's unity. Jews faced both Muslims and Christians on the Iberian peninsula, and they were also aware of the distinction between them.
  • Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation

    Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation

    Variation in Form and Function in Jewish English Intonation Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Rachel Steindel Burdin ∼6 6 Graduate Program in Linguistics The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Professor Brian D. Joseph, Advisor Professor Cynthia G. Clopper Professor Donald Winford c Rachel Steindel Burdin, 2016 Abstract Intonation has long been noted as a salient feature of American Jewish English speech (Weinreich, 1956); however, there has not been much systematic study of how, exactly Jewish English intonation is distinct, and to what extent Yiddish has played a role in this distinctness. This dissertation examines the impact of Yiddish on Jewish English intonation in the Jewish community of Dayton, Ohio, and how features of Yiddish intonation are used in Jewish English. 20 participants were interviewed for a production study. The participants were balanced for gender, age, religion (Jewish or not), and language background (whether or not they spoke Yiddish in addition to English). In addition, recordings were made of a local Yiddish club. The production study revealed differences in both the form and function in Jewish English, and that Yiddish was the likely source for that difference. The Yiddish-speaking participants were found to both have distinctive productions of rise-falls, including higher peaks, and a wider pitch range, in their Yiddish, as well as in their English produced during the Yiddish club meetings. The younger Jewish English participants also showed a wider pitch range in some situations during the interviews.
  • Jewish Subcultures Online: Outreach, Dating, and Marginalized Communities ______

    Jewish Subcultures Online: Outreach, Dating, and Marginalized Communities ______

    JEWISH SUBCULTURES ONLINE: OUTREACH, DATING, AND MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton ____________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in American Studies ____________________________________ By Rachel Sara Schiff Thesis Committee Approval: Professor Leila Zenderland, Chair Professor Terri Snyder, Department of American Studies Professor Carrie Lane, Department of American Studies Spring, 2016 ABSTRACT This thesis explores how Jewish individuals use and create communities online to enrich their Jewish identity. The Internet provides Jews who do not fit within their brick and mortar communities an outlet that gives them voice, power, and sometimes anonymity. They use these websites to balance their Jewish identities and other personal identities that may or may not fit within their local Jewish community. This research was conducted through analyzing a broad range of websites. The first chapter, the introduction, describes the Jewish American population as a whole as well as the history of the Internet. The second chapter, entitled “The Black Hats of the Internet,” discusses how the Orthodox community has used the Internet to create a modern approach to outreach. It focuses in particular on the extensive web materials created by Chabad and Aish Hatorah, which offer surprisingly modern twists on traditional texts. The third chapter is about Jewish online dating. It uses JDate and other secular websites to analyze how Jewish singles are using the Internet. This chapter also suggests that the use of the Internet may have an impact on reducing interfaith marriage. The fourth chapter examines marginalized communities, focusing on the following: Jewrotica; the Jewish LGBT community including those who are “OLGBT” (Orthodox LGBT); Punk Jews; and feminist Jews.
  • Reference Books on Jewish Names

    Reference Books on Jewish Names

    Courtesy of the Ackman & Ziff Family Genealogy Institute June 2007 Reference Books On Jewish Names Ames, Winthrop. What Shall We Name the Baby? New York: Simon & Schuster, 1935. REF YIVO CS 2367 .A4 1935 Bahlow, Hans. Dictionary of German Names: Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute for German­ American Studies, 2002. REF LBI CS 2541 B34 D53 Beider, Alexander. A Dictionary of Ashkenazic Given Names: Their Origins, Structure, Pronunciation, and Migrations. Bergenfield, NJ: Avotaynu, 2001, 682 pp. Identifies more than 15,000 given names derived from 735 root names. Includes a 300­page thesis on the origins, structure, pronunciation, and migrations of Ashkenazic given names. Genealogy Institute CS 3010 .B18 Beider, Alexander. A Dictionary of Jewish Surnames from Galicia . Avotaynu, 2004. Covers 25,000 different surnames used by Jews in Galicia., describing the districts within Galicia where the surname appeared, the origin of the meaning of the name, and the variants found. Genealogy Institute . CS 3010 .Z9 G353 2004 Beider, Alexander. A Dictionary of Jewish Surnames from the Kingdom of Poland. Teaneck, NJ: Avotaynu, Inc., 1996, 608 pp. More than 32,000 Jewish surnames with origins in that part of the Russian Empire known as the Kingdom of Poland or Congress Poland. Genealogy Institute CS 3010 .B419 Beider, Alexander. A Dictionary of Jewish Surnames from the Russian Empire. Teaneck, NJ: Avotaynu, Inc., 1993, 784 pp. A compilation of 50,000 Jewish surnames from the Russian Pale of Settlement describing their geographic distribution within the Russian Empire at the start of the 20th century, an explanation of the meaning of the name, and spelling variants.
  • DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500S Elizabeth C

    DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500S Elizabeth C

    International Social Science Review Volume 95 | Issue 2 Article 2 DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s Elizabeth C. Hirschman James A. Vance Jesse D. Harris Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr Part of the Anthropology Commons, Communication Commons, Genealogy Commons, Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hirschman, Elizabeth C.; Vance, James A.; and Harris, Jesse D. () "DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s," International Social Science Review: Vol. 95 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol95/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Social Science Review by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. DNA Evidence of a Croatian and Sephardic Jewish Settlement on the North Carolina Coast Dating from the Mid to Late 1500s Cover Page Footnote Elizabeth C. Hirschman is the Hill Richmond Gott rP ofessor of Business at The nivU ersity of Virginia's College at Wise. James A. Vance is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at The nivU ersity of Virginia's College at Wise. Jesse D. Harris is a student studying Computer Science
  • Honi the Circle Drawer: “A Member of the Household” Or “A Son Who Implores His Father”?

    Honi the Circle Drawer: “A Member of the Household” Or “A Son Who Implores His Father”?

    Journal for the Study of Judaism 48 (2017) 1-13 Journal for the Study of Judaism brill.com/jsj Honi the Circle Drawer: “A Member of the Household” or “A Son Who Implores His Father”? Isaiah Ben-Pazi Hemdat Hadarom, Netivot, Israel [email protected] Abstract This article analyzes the meaning of two short metaphors used in the legend of Honi the Circle Drawer that define Honi’s relationship with God: Honi referred to himself as a “ben bayit” and Shimon son of Shatah called him “a son who implores his father” (m. Taʿan. 3:8). Explaining these metaphors contains the key to understanding the con- flict between Honi and Simeon son of Shatah who criticized him harshly. Most of the explanations for this exchange suggested previously involve imposing philosophical issues that are not suggested by the text. This article examines the use of the key term “ben bayit” and shows that it indicates a position of a slave who has decision-making powers in God’s “house.” This is what Honi presumed to be, and Shimon rejected. Keywords Honi the Circle Drawer – rainmaking – Hasid – rabbinic 1 Background and State of the Research The Mishnah describes a miracle ascribed to Honi the Circle Drawer (here- after: Honi), and the sharp response he received from Simeon son of Shatah (hereafter: SBS). The text of the Mishnah describes a situation that it was in the middle of the winter, and still it had not rained. The Mishnah says:1 1 m. Taʿan. 3:8 and parallel sources that are primarily b. Taʿan.