DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Gsp Forest Monitoring Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 Gsp Forest Monitoring Team 2011 GSP FOREST MONITORING TEAM END-OF-SEASON REPORT Malia Caracoglia GSP Forest Monitoring Team Program Coordinator November 2011 Contents 2011 GSP Forest Monitoring Program Summary of Accomplishments and Recommendations ................................................ 2 Recruitment ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Training ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Public Relations ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Communications .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Field Work ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Equipment ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Volunteer Management ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Data Management ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Monitoring Protocol .......................................................................................................................................................................10 Contractor Training ........................................................................................................................................................................11 Recommendations .........................................................................................................................................................................12 Appendix A ......................................................................................................................................................................................19 Appendix B .....................................................................................................................................................................................20 Appendix C .....................................................................................................................................................................................23 Appendix D .....................................................................................................................................................................................24 Appendix E ......................................................................................................................................................................................26 Appendix F ......................................................................................................................................................................................30 Appendix G .....................................................................................................................................................................................35 Appendix H .....................................................................................................................................................................................36 Appendix I .......................................................................................................................................................................................37 Appendix J ......................................................................................................................................................................................42 Appendix K .....................................................................................................................................................................................43 Appendix L ......................................................................................................................................................................................45 Appendix M.....................................................................................................................................................................................46 Appendix N .....................................................................................................................................................................................48 Appendix O .....................................................................................................................................................................................53 Appendix P......................................................................................................................................................................................54 Appendix Q .....................................................................................................................................................................................57 1 2011 GSP Forest Monitoring Program Summary of Accomplishments and Recommendations Accomplishments: Ten introductory trainings educated 133 individuals in the protocols of forest monitoring 41 volunteers installed an average of four plots each Plots completed by volunteers:62 new plots installed and 26 (out of 32)plots monitored from 2010 in 34 different Seattle Parks (note: six 2010 plots were not monitored in 2011 because no change occurred) Plots completed by contractors: 16 new plots installed in 14 different parks Total new plots for 2011:79 Total GSP forest monitoring plots:110;Total parks with plots: 40 Approximately 952 volunteers hours were dedicated to training and installing monitoring plots Online database was a successful means of data entry for volunteers and program coordinator. Trained additional groups and contractors to perform monitoring such as the Nature Consortium, SCA, Seattle Conservation Corps, Washington Conservation Corps, Forterra , Green Cities Staff from Tacoma and Kent and Seattle Parks Staff. Recommendations: Recruit and promote the program earlier, utilizing the Marketing Plan developed in 2012 and the knowledge of EarthCorps staff. Design a more comprehensive website with access to documents, ability to sign up for trainings, and a more comprehensive explanation of the program and its accomplishments. Include in budget for 2012: additional complete set of equipment, develop an incentive program for volunteers with GSP FMT branding, additional educational opportunities in the form of speakers or plant walks, time for program coordinator and EarthCorps staff to publicize program. Three or four introductory trainings recommended in 2012 with the intent of recruiting 40+ volunteers. Provide trainings to returning volunteers to refresh their skills and re-engage in the program. Space trainings throughout the monitoring season (i.e. May, July, September), this can help ensure a “fresh” pool of volunteers to ensure active involvement in plot installations throughout the monitoring season (May-October). Purchase at least one more set of equipment to meet the growing needs of the program. Create a list of parks and plot locations to be monitored early in the season, ideally before trainings begin (March/April). The monitoring protocol should be in a more user-friendly format: booklet, color-coded or tabbed sections. Meet with SPR at beginning of season to help determine training needs, plot locations 2 and reporting requests. It is advised that the program coordinator be present for initial plot instillation of the season for contractors as they may not be up-to-date on the protocol. More coordination with contractors and the natural areas and trails crews would be desirable to help install plots in areas that are appropriate for volunteers. If the contractor or natural areas crew notified the GSP Forest Monitoring Team coordinator of their schedule and work locations, the program can arrange for volunteers to sample the area before work begins. This would be particularly desirable for the natural areas and trails crews and other park staff who do restoration work throughout Seattle but are not currently coordinating with the program. 3 2011 Forest Monitoring Team Program Recruitment A flyer was developed that briefly described the program, its goals, training dates and contact information (Appendix A ). The flyer was emailed to contacts and then forwarded on or posted in a public location. This was used to recruit to the following groups/people (See complete recruitment list in Appendix B): Green Seattle Partnership current and past Forest Stewards Washington Native Plant Society members and stewards Community Centers in South Seattle Nature Consortium Mountaineers Club Center for Urban Horticulture UWREN Seattle Audubon Society Edmonds Community College,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parks and Recreation
    PARKS AND RECREATION Parks and Recreation Overview of Facilities and Programs The Department of Parks and Recreation manages 400 parks and open areas in its approximately 6,200 acres of property throughout the City, works with the public to be good stewards of the park system, and provides safe and welcoming opportunities for the public to play, learn, contemplate, and build community. The park system comprises about 10% of the City’s land area; it includes 485 buildings, 224 parks, 185 athletic fields, 122 children's play areas, 24 community centers, 151 outdoor tennis courts, 22 miles of boulevards, an indoor tennis center, two outdoor and eight indoor swimming pools, four golf courses, studios, boat ramps, moorage, fishing piers, trails, camps, viewpoints and open spaces, a rock climbing site, a conservatory, a classical Japanese garden, and a waterfront aquarium. The development of this system is guided by the Seattle Parks & Recreation Plan 2000, the 38 neighborhood plans, the Joint Athletic Facilities Development Program with the Seattle School District, the 1999 Seattle Center and Community Centers Levy, the 2000 Parks Levy, and DPR’s annual update to the Major Maintenance Plan. 2000 Parks Levy In November 2000, Seattle voters approved a $198.2 million levy lid lift for Parks and Recreation. The levy closely follows the plan forged by the Pro Parks 2000 Citizens Planning Committee. The levy is designed to fund more than 100 projects to improve maintenance and enhance programming of existing parks, including the Woodland Park Zoo; acquire, develop and maintain new neighborhood parks, green spaces, playfields, trails and boulevards; and add out-of-school and senior activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Design Commission
    Seattle Design APPROVED Commission MINUTES OF THE MEETING 6 March 2003 Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Donald Royse Chair Projects Reviewed Convened: 8:30am Gasworks Park Site Plan Laura Ballock South Lake Union Park Kubota Gardens Ralph Cipriani Joint Meeting with Planning Commission Seattle Monorail Project Jack Mackie Cary Moon Adjourned: 5:00pm Iain M. Robertson Nic Rossouw David Spiker Commissioners Present Staff Present Donald Royse, Chair John Rahaim Sharon E. Sutton Laura Ballock Layne Cubell Ralph Cipriani Brad Gassman Tory Laughlin Taylor Cary Moon Anna O’Connell Nic Rossouw John Rahaim, David Spiker Executive Director Sharon E. Sutton Tory Laughlin Taylor Layne Cubell, Commission Coordinator Department of Design, Construction & Land Use 700 5th Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-5070 phone 206/233-7911 fax 206/386-4039 printed on recycled paper Page 2 of 24 6 Mar 2003 Project: Gasworks Park Site Plan Phase: Conceptual Design Update Previous Reviews: 6 Feb 2003 (Conceptual Design) Presenters: Jeff Girvin, Berger Partnership Guy Michaelson, Berger Partnership Attendees: Alley Rutzel Jerry Malmo Chris Mapes Michael Shiosaki, Parks and Recreation Tim Motzer, Parks and Recreation Susanne Friedman, Parks and Recreation Time: 1 hour (SDC Ref. # 169 | DC00297) Action: The Commission thanks the team for coming and giving them the opportunity to see the project before the next stage of development and would like to make the following comments and recommendations. The Design Commission applauds what the team has done with comments from the
    [Show full text]
  • The Artists' View of Seattle
    WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of the Garden's Development
    Kubota Garden Foundation B. History 1. HISTORICAL CONTEXT The “Alien Land Law,” passed in 1921 by the Washington State Legislature, prohibited people who were not eligible for citizenship from owning land. At that time, Japanese immigrants were not eligible to become citizens. Mr. Kubota worked around this discrimination by purchasing the property in the name of a friend. He purchased more property over time for a total of 20 acres. Eventually, the property title for the first five acres was transferred to Fujitaro’s eldest son, Tak Kubota, who was over 21 years old, born in the U.S., and therefore a citizen. Fujitaro planted nursery stock and created demonstrations of his garden building skill. He was well known for successful transplant and transport of large planting material. The land was chosen for many reasons, including the interesting topography and year- round natural running water. When purchased, the land was recently logged and swampy. There are less than a dozen trees in the garden that were here in 1927. The oldest is the Grand Fir which is over 200 years old and 139-feet tall. This is an American Japanese Garden; Japanese garden elements are blended with plants available in the Pacific Northwest. Traditional Japanese gardens have only shades of green in their plantings. Fujitaro Kubota included trees with more colors – blues and yellows. He helped to create this fusion gardening. Notable Kubota Gardening Company installations include Seattle University, Bloedel Reserve and many private residences. The Kubotas used their aesthetic and artistic vision to build the gardens, painting with trees, stone and water.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Park
    LINCOLN PARK 8011 Fauntleroy Way S. S Seattle, WA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Draft December 2002 Prepared by: Urban Forestry Program Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation Eliza Davidson, Urban Forester David Bergendorf Ann Hirschi GIS Support: Joel Calhoun Mary Mekkers 2000-2001 Vegetation Plat Surveys: Metta Hanson Stewart Wechsler DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS LINCOLN PARK VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. Overview 1.1 Lincoln Park Site Plan 1 1.2 Plan Summary: 2 Introduction Site Description History VMP Goals Public Process Management Area Recommendations 1.3 How to Use This Plan 3 2. Goals and Objectives 2.1 Overall Park Goals 1 2.2 Urban Forestry Program Objectives 1 2.3 Lincoln ParkVegetation Management Plan Goals and Objectives 1 3. Plan Context 3.1 Lincoln Park History 1 3.2 Previous Plans and Policies 2 3.3 Summary of Citizen Concerns 3 3.4 Vegetation-related Uses 3 4. Assessment of Existing Resource 4.1 Soils of Lincoln Park 1 4.2 Slope Stability and Erosion 1 4.3 Vegetation Plot Inventory Methods 1 4.4 Vegetation Inventory Analysis 2 4.5 Existing Vegetation Zones 3 Zone A – Beach Vegetation 3 Zone B – Bigleaf Maple/ Red Alder/ Douglas Fir Forest 3 Zone C – North Mixed Native/ Non-native Landscape 4 Zone D – Grand Fir/ Western Red Cedar Forest 4 Zone E – Turf and Ballfields 5 Zone F – Central Greensward 5 Zone G – Bigleaf Maple/ Red Alder Forest 5 Zone H – Douglas Fir/ Red Alder Forest 6 Zone I – Pacific Madrone/ Red Alder/ Douglas Fir Forest 6 Zone J – Pacific Madrone/ Douglas Fir Forest 7 Zone K – Forest Clearing 7 Zone L – Lawson Cypress/ Western Red Cedar Forest 8 Zone M – South Greensward 8 4.6 Wildlife Habitat 9 4.7 Encroachments 10 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Go for a Hike (In the City) Healthy Environment Stories
    Go for a Hike (in the City) Healthy Environment Stories Are you looking for a place to connect with nature or just relax but can’t make a trip to the mountains? Try a trail right in the city! Seattle parks are home to some 96 miles of “soft” trails in forested, beach, bluff, and meadow areas where you can walk, hike, run, and in some cases ride trail bikes. The U.S. Forest Service has recognized trails for their recreational value since the 1930s, and for their contributions to our health and well-being since the 1960s. The popularity of trails continues to increase. They provide access to environmentally sensitive areas while protecting those areas themselves by encouraging people to stay on their groomed surfaces. At Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR), Chukundi “Trails Guy” Salisbury has tended, created, and overseen our trails for the last 17 years. Asked what he thinks are the main reasons people use and love their trails, Salisbury says without hesitation, “to get out into the forests and green spaces of the city, to walk or otherwise exercise, and because they’re free and accessible – there are trails in parks in every corner of the city.” In 2011, Salisbury brought his brain child to life by creating the Youth Green Corps, a nine-month annual program that recruits youth between the ages of 18 and 24, trains them in trail construction and maintenance, and provides them with a stipend. Many of the youth are homeless, disengaged or from underserved communities, and the program provides them with direction, education, life skills, a love of the outdoors, and a path to a green career.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teacher's Guide to Kubota Garden
    A Teacher’s Guide to Kubota Garden Elementary School Kubota Garden Foundation Written and produced by: Kubota Garden Foundation Published • September 1993 • Revised January 2005 • Revised August 2016 • Revised October 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. All images © 2016 Kubota Garden Foundation or used by permission of the photographer. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter @kubotagarden and Instagram. Garden Location: 9817 55th Ave S | Seattle, WA 98118 Kubota Garden Foundation 10915 – 51st Avenue South | Seattle, WA 98178-2160 | 206-725-5060 [email protected] | www.kubotagarden.org Revised August 2016 Page 2 Kubota Garden Foundation Revised August 2016 Page 3 Kubota Garden Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE To Teachers .......................................................... 6 Objectives ............................................................. 8 Kubota Garden Manners ..................................... 10 What is Kubota Garden like? ............................... 12 History ................................................................ 14 Touring the Garden ............................................. 18 Sample Lesson .................................................... 28 Some Suggested Activities ................................... 32 Evaluation ........................................................... 38 Addendum 1: Resources ...................................... 40 Addendum 2: The Jewel of Rainier Beach ............ 42
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Committee
    2019-21 CAPITAL BUDGET BALANCE SHEET & PROJECT LISTS Ways & Means Committee Senate Committee SENATE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE APRIL 2019 http://www.leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/WM/Pages/default.aspx 2019-21 Biennial and 2019 Supplemental Capital Budget Senate Committee (SSB 5134) Includes Alternative Finacing/Certificates of Participation (Dollars in Thousands) Debt Limit Other Bond Other Funds Total Funds Bonds Authority6,7 2017-19 Capital Budget with Proposed 2019 Supplemental Bond Authorization1 $2,930,230 $20,000 Appropriations 2017-192 and 1st Supplemental Capital Budget3 $2,919,383 $47,117 $1,645,784 $4,612,284 2017-19 2nd Supplemental Capital Budget5 ($39,832) $0 $5,350 ($34,482) Total 2017-19 with Proposed 2nd Supplemental $2,879,551 $47,117 $1,651,134 $4,577,802 2017-19 Remaining Bond Authority $50,679 2019-21 Capital Budget (New) Bond Authorization4 Tax Exempt Bonds $2,881,529 $52,000 State Taxable Building Construction Account $179,020 Bond Authorization4 $3,060,549 $52,000 Appropriations5 Tax Exempt Bonds $2,899,355 $52,000 $1,959,191 $4,910,546 Bond Capacity Adjustment8 ($83,576) $0 State Taxable Building Construction Account $179,020 $0 $0 $179,020 Total 2019-21 Proposal $2,994,799 $52,000 $1,959,191 $5,089,566 2019-21 Remaining Bond Authority $116,429 1. Chapter 3, Laws of 2018 2. Chapter 2, Laws of 2018 3. Chapter 298, Laws of 2018 4. Bond Bill SSB 5133 5. Capital Budget Bill SSB 5134 6. Chapter 1, Laws of 2018 7. SSB 5537 (behavioral health facilities) 8. Reflects swapping SB 5993 MTCA cash for bond proceeds on MTCA project reappropriations Senate Ways & Means 1 2019-21 Capital Budget Senate Committee (SSB 5134) * Includes Projects Funded through Alternative Financing (Dollars In Thousands) New Appropriations State Bonds Total Governmental Operations Office of the Secretary of State 1.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX G Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area
    APPENDIX G Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area June 2014 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement This appendix lists and illustrates the parks and recreation facilities in the Plan area based on available geographic information systems (GIS) data. GIS data sources were as follows: • Snohomish County • King County • Pierce County • City of Everett • City of Mountlake Terrace • City of Lake Forest Park This information was not verified in the field and parks and recreation facility representatives were not contacted to determine ownership or the recreational uses associated with these resources. Over 1,300 parks and recreation facilities were listed in the available GIS database including a wide variety of open space areas, sports fields, trails, and water- oriented facilities. The park or recreation facility ID numbers in Table G-1 correspond to those ID numbers in Figure G-1 and Figure G-2. Table G-1. Parks and recreation facilities in the Plan area, by county Facility ID Facility ID number Facility name number Facility name Snohomish County 104 Unnamed park or recreation facility 3 Unnamed park or recreation facility 105 Unnamed park or recreation facility 5 Unnamed park or recreation facility 106 Unnamed park or recreation facility 6 Unnamed park or recreation facility 107 Unnamed park or recreation facility 7 Unnamed park or recreation facility 108 Unnamed park or recreation facility 9 Unnamed park or recreation facility 109 Unnamed park or recreation facility 19 Unnamed park or recreation facility 110 Unnamed
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Master Plan Update
    2019 KUBOTA GARDEN MASTER PLAN UPDATE KUBOTA GARDEN 2019 MASTER PLAN UPDATE for Seattle Department of Parks & Recreation A and the Kubota Garden Foundation B C D by Jones & Jones Architects + Landscape Architects + Planners 105 South Main Street, Suite 300 E F G Seattle, Washington 98104 Cover Photo Credits: Hoshide Wanzer A. KGF Photo #339 (1976) B. Jones & Jones (2018) C. Jones & Jones (2018) D. KGF Photo #19 (1959) E. KGF Photo #259 (1962) Architects 206 624 5702 F. Jones & Jones (2018) G. Jones & Jones (2018) www.jonesandjones.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 4 I. INTRODUCTION. .. .6 VI. PREFERRED CONCEPT . .. .. .. .. ..40 SUPPORT FOR THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE . .5 Need for a Master Plan Update Guiding Principles Garden Mission History: Fujitaro Kubota's Life, Inspiration, and Garden Style History: Setting the Period of Significance II. PLANNING PROCESS . .10 Necklace of Ponds Kyōryoku - Collective Effort Japanese Garden Seeking Input The Mountainside Opportunities & Issues Visitor Experience III. HISTORY OF KUBOTA GARDEN. .12 Visitor Amenities Kubota Family Wayfinding and Visitor Circulation Hierarchy Kubota Gardening Company Visitor Center Post World War II Garden Improvements Transitioning from Garden to Park IV. SITE ANALYSIS. 16 VII. IMPLEMENTATION . 65 Neighborhood Context Phasing & Implementation Visitation Staffing Mapes Creek & Natural Areas Garden Arrival APPENDIX (Separate Document) The Garden Garden History Resources Events & Programming Workshops Summary Maintenance Area Open House(s) Summary V. GARDEN NEED . .36
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Village Maps
    West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village Existing Public Transit School Landmark Residential Lines Urban Village Grocery Store Park Future Light Rail Line Proposed Draft Urban Village Community P-Patch Frequent Transit Center T Node Expansion 37 21 57 773 21X 116X 37 118X C 55 119X 56X 50 128 55 21X C 50 55 50 21X 57 128 West Seattle Golf Course C 37 C 50 T 50 773 22 128 10 Minute Walk * Camp Long 116X 118X 21 119X 21X 10 Minute Walk * C Fairmount Park Miles 0 1/8 1/4 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Rainier Beach Residential Urban Village Existing Public Transit School Landmark Residential Lines Urban Village Grocery Store Park Sound Transit Light Rail Line Proposed Draft Urban Village Community P-Patch Frequent Transit Center T Node Expansion 7 Pritchard 9X Island 10 Minute Walk * 50 8 Rainier Beach Playeld East Duwamish Greenbelt 9X Beer Sheva Park 10 Minute Walk * T 8 9X 8 50 7 8 107 106 107 8 7 107 7 106 10 Minute Walk * 107 Hutchinson Playground Kubota Garden 106 Miles 0 1/8 1/4 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Othello Residential Urban Village Existing Public Transit School Landmark Residential Lines Urban Village Grocery Store Park Sound Transit Light Rail Line Proposed Draft Urban Village Community P-Patch Frequent Transit Center T Node Expansion S FINDLAY ST 37TH AVE
    [Show full text]