French Tanks of World War I Free
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Medium Mark a Whippet
MEDIUM MARK A WHIPPET DAVID FLETCHER ILLUSTRATED BY HENRY MORSHEAD © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 207 MEDIUM MARK A WHIPPET DAVID FLETCHER ILLUSTRATED BY HENRY MORESHEAD © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS THE WHIPPET’S FORERUNNER: THE TRITTON CHASER 4 PRODUCTION OF THE WHIPPET 10 DRIVING THE WHIPPET 12 THE WHIPPET IN ACTION 16 WHIPPETS ABROAD 29 MEDIUM B 30 MEDIUM C: THE HORNET 36 MEDIUM D 40 THE STUDEBAKER TANK 46 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MEDIUM MARK A WHIPPET THE WHIPPET’S FORERUNNER: THE TRITTON CHASER According to the engineer William Tritton, credited as one of the inventors of the tank, he was asked to produce a lighter tank when he visited the Somme on 20 September 1916. This was only five days since tanks had been launched onto the battlefield for the very first time. Tritton does not say who requested this, but the implication must be that it was Sir Douglas Haig, Commander-in-Chief of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), either directly or through his staff. No matter who was responsible, it was either remarkably prescient or a very lucky guess. It is valid to ask whether the idea of a faster, lighter machine was considered as an alternative to the slower, heavier tanks, or as an adjunct to them, which we have always assumed, but the fact that Tritton’s design did not have the trench crossing ability of the heavy tanks, and that improved versions of the heavy tank were developed, must support the adjunct theory in retrospect. It is interesting to consider what fellow engineer Walter Wilson, another crucial contributor to the early tank, knew of all this. -
Tanks and Tank Warfare | International Encyclopedia of The
Version 1.0 | Last updated 17 May 2016 Tanks and Tank Warfare By Michael David Kennedy World War I introduced new technologies and doctrine in a quest to overcome the tactical stalemate of the trenches. The first tanks had great potential that would be capitalized upon during the next world war, but early models suffered from design flaws and lack of doctrine for their use on the battlefield. Table of Contents 1 Definition and Background 2 Characteristics 3 Development in Great Britain 4 Battle of the Somme (1 July-18 November 1916) 5 Battle of Cambrai (20-30 November 1917) 6 French Tanks 7 German Tanks 8 Tanks in the American Expeditionary Forces 9 Impact of Tanks on World War I Selected Bibliography Citation Definition and Background Tanks are armored vehicles designed to combine the military factors of fire, maneuver and protection. Although the concept of armored vehicles preceded the Great War, the tank was specifically developed to overcome the stalemate of trench warfare on the Western Front that followed the First Battle of Ypres (19 October-22 November 1914). The marrying of recent technological advances, such as the internal combustion engine with armor plating, enabled the tank’s development during World War I. Characteristics The first tanks introduced in 1916 were generally slow and hard to maneuver, and they performed poorly in rugged terrain. The early models were heavily influenced by commercial tractors. While impervious to barbed wire, small arms, and shrapnel, their primitive armor was still susceptible to heavy machine gun fire and direct hits from high explosive artillery rounds. -
GURPS WWII Classic
World War II raged from the deserts of North Africa to the jungles of the South Pacific, from the mountaintops of the Alps to the beaches of Normandy, across (and under) the high seas, and through the skies above it all. Soldiers in all of these places relied upon the machines of war: bombers, fighters, tanks, jeeps, ships, submarines, landing craft, and much more. GURPS WWII: Motor Pool has a huge variety of historically accurate vehicles from mankind’s greatest conflict. Many of the vehicles were common; others were rare or even unique. From the stodgy General Lee tank to the earliest helicopters and the wildly impractical Maus, Motor Pool has tons of new gear for every GURPS WWII player. Motor Pool also gathers in one place all the refinements to the vehicle design system that have evolved since the original corebook came out, as well as a new system to describe any WWII-era conveyance in a few simple steps. These additions include scores of new weapons to be fitted on your war machines – some historical and some products of the imagination. On top of all that, Motor Pool has advice on S how to integrate vehicles into a roleplaying T E campaign, with details on how vehicle crews V really lived and fought, from the difficulties of E supply to getting their machine moving at all. J A Whether you’re campaigning by land, by sea, or C by air, Motor Pool dramatically expands your K options! S O N . AGAINST HEAVY METAL! FIRST EDITION,FIRST PRINTING G A PUBLISHED APRIL 2004 M ISBN 1-55634-642-5 E 9!BMF@JA:RSUSQQoYjZ]ZiZdZ` S 8 0 1 Printed in 1 SJG02495 8011 the USA World War II raged from the deserts of North Africa to the jungles of the South Pacific, from the mountaintops of the Alps to the beaches of Normandy, across (and under) the high seas, and through the skies above it all. -
France Historical AFV Register
France Historical AFV Register Armored Fighting Vehicles Preserved in France Updated 24 July 2016 Pierre-Olivier Buan Neil Baumgardner For the AFV Association 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................4 ALSACE.................................................................................................................5 Bas-Rhin / Lower Rhine (67)........................................................5 Haut-Rhin / Upper Rhine (68)......................................................10 AQUITAINE...........................................................................................................12 Dordogne (24) .............................................................................12 Gironde (33) ................................................................................13 Lot-et-Garonne (47).....................................................................14 AUVERGNE............................................................................................................15 Puy-de-Dôme (63)........................................................................15 BASSE-NORMANDIE / LOWER NORMANDY............................................................16 Calvados (14)...............................................................................16 Manche (50).................................................................................19 Orne (61).....................................................................................21 -
The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama
The Secret School of War: The Soviet-German Tank Academy at Kama THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ian Johnson Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Master's Examination Committee: Jennifer Siegel, Advisor Peter Mansoor David Hoffmann Copyright by Ian Ona Johnson 2012 Abstract This paper explores the period of military cooperation between the Weimar Period German Army (the Reichswehr), and the Soviet Union. Between 1922 and 1933, four facilities were built in Russia by the two governments, where a variety of training and technological exercises were conducted. These facilities were particularly focused on advances in chemical and biological weapons, airplanes and tanks. The most influential of the four facilities was the tank testing and training grounds (Panzertruppenschule in the German) built along the Kama River, near Kazan in North- Central Russia. Led by German instructors, the school’s curriculum was based around lectures, war games, and technological testing. Soviet and German students studied and worked side by side; German officers in fact often wore the Soviet uniform while at the school, to show solidarity with their fellow officers. Among the German alumni of the school were many of the most famous practitioners of mobile warfare during the Second World War, such as Guderian, Manstein, Kleist and Model. This system of education proved highly innovative. During seven years of operation, the school produced a number of extremely important technological and tactical innovations. Among the new technologies were a new tank chassis system, superior guns, and - perhaps most importantly- a radio that could function within a tank. -
The Historical Combat Effectiveness of Lighter-Weight Armored Forces
The Dupuy Institute 1497 Chain Bridge Road Suite 100 McLean, VA 22101 Phone: (703) 356-1151 Fax: (703) 356-1152 Website: http://dupuyinstitute.org/ THE HISTORICAL COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS OF LIGHTER-WEIGHT ARMORED FORCES FINAL REPORT Contract Number DASW01-98-D-0058, Task Order 005 6 August 2001 Prepared for: U.S. Department of the Army Center for Army Analysis 6001 Goethals Road Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-5230 I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Definitions .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Plan..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Technology ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Wheeled Tanks ............................................................................................................................................. 3 The Interim Brigade/Division ....................................................................................................................... 4 II. USE OF ARMOR IN CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS........................................................................................ 5 Presence of Armor in SSCOs....................................................................................................................... -
The Panzer Divisions Included a Balanced Mix of Tanks, Mechanized Infantry, and Motorized Artillery
DUE033 Cov.qxd:DUE033 Cov 22/11/10 11:21 Page 1 DUEL • 33 This is the account of machines of war pitted against each other and the combatants who operated them. Step onto the battlefield OSPREY and immerse yourself in the experience of real historic combat. PANZERIV CHARB1BIS DUEL Engage the Enemy PANZER IV VS CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 The Battle of France in 1940 involved the first large-scale tank-against-tank battles in history. The massive clashes at Stonne, Hannant, and Gembloux involved hundreds of tanks on both sides, yet have faded from memory due to the enormity of the French defeat. This book examines two of the premier opposing tanks of the Wehrmacht and the French Army, the German PzKpfw IV PANZER IV and the French Char B1 bis. With a complete history of the design, development, and deployment of these armored fighting vehicles, the story of these great battles is once again brought to life. Colorartwork Photographs Unrivaleddetail Cutawayartwork CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 STEVENJ.ZALOGA OSPREY PUBLISHING O SPREY WWW.OSPREYPUBLISHING.COM STEVEN J. ZALOGA DUE033 Text.qxd:DUE033 Text 4/10/10 08:43 Page 1 PANZER IV CHAR B1 BIS France 1940 STEVEN J. ZALOGA DUE033 Text.qxd:DUE033 Text 22/11/10 11:26 Page 2 First published in Great Britain in 2011 by Osprey Publishing, Author’s Note Midland House, West Way, Botley, Oxford, OX2 0PH, UK 44–02 23rd St, Suite 219, Long Island City, NY 11101, USA I would especially like to thank David Lehmann and Dr. -
Soviet Tank Development During the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected]
Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Undergraduate Theses Spring 2019 Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War Jeremy Paugh Concordia University - Portland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses Part of the History Commons CU Commons Citation Paugh, Jeremy, "Steel Monsters: Soviet Tank Development during the Second World War" (2019). Undergraduate Theses. 185. https://commons.cu-portland.edu/theses/185 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HST 493- Steel Monsters: Soviet Armor Development During World War 2 A senior thesis submitted to The Department of History College of Arts & Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in History By: Jeremy Paugh Faculty Supervisor ______________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Joel Davis Date Department Chair _______________________________________________ _____________ Kimberly Knutsen Date Dean, College of Arts & Sciences ________________________________________________ _____________ Dr. Michael Thomas Date Provost _______________________________________________________ _____________ Michelle Cowing Date Concordia University Portland, Oregon May, 2018 1 Abstract: This thesis aims to explore the far-reaching effects of armored warfare and tank -
France Allies
Armies of and france the aLLies Written by: Rick Priestley, Paul Beccarelli, Steven MacLauchlan and Judson MacCaull Edited by: Alessio Cavatore and Rick Priestley Cover artwork: Peter Dennis IInteriornterior ArtArtwork:work: MiMikek Chappell, Richard Chasemore, Peter Dennis, HoHowardward GGerrard,errar Richard Hook, Steve Noon and Mark Stacey MiMiniaturesni painted by: Neil Burt, Jose Bustamante, AAndrésndrés AmiAmiánán Fernández,Fernánd Stephan Huber, Gary Martin, Bruce Murray ThThanksanks ttoo DaDaveve BBodleyodle at Grand Manner for the donation of painted terrain pieces. Sample file OSPREYREY PUBLISHINGP ING ospreypublishing.com warlordgames.com Contents What Is This Book? 5 Laffly S15TOE 27 VEHICLES 48 Amd Laffly 80AM 27 TANKS 48 France 7 Amd Laffly 50AM 28 FT-17/18 48 Amd Panhard 165/175 28 T15 Light Tank 49 Army List 9 TRANSPORTS AND TOWS 30 TANK DESTROYERS 49 REINFORCED PLATOON 10 General Purpose Trucks 30 T13 Tank Hunter 49 ARMY SPECIAL RULES 10 Cars And Light Utility Trucks 30 Vickers Carden-Loyd Mk.VI 47MM FRC Tank Destroyer 49 Communication Breakdown! 10 Berliet Vudb Carrier 30 ARMOURED CARS AND RECCE VEHICLES 50 Forward Artillery Doctrine 10 Laffly S20TL Six-Wheeled Truck 30 ACG-1 50 Hurriedly Conscripted Reserves 11 Lorraine 38 Carrier 30 Minerva Armoured Car 50 TYPES OF UNIT 11 Unic/Citroen-Kegresse Half-Track 30 TRANSPORTS AND TOWS 50 HEADQUARTERS UNITS 11 Laffly S15 And V15 Tractor 31 FN Tricar T3 50 Officer 11 Renault Eu Chenillette 31 Ford Marmon-Herrington Armoured Tractor 50 Medic 11 Lorraine 37 31 Utility B Tractor -
PANZER III SOMUA S 35 Belgium 1940
PANZER III SOMUA S 35 Belgium 1940 STEVEN J. ZALOGA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com PANZER III SOMUA S 35 Belgium 1940 STEVEN J. ZALOGA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Introduction 4 Chronology 8 Design and Development 10 Technical Specifications 22 The Combatants 27 The Strategic Situation 46 Combat 50 Statistics and Analysis 71 Conclusion 76 Further Reading 78 Index 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION This book examines the confrontation between two of the best battle tanks of the 1940 campaign, the French Somua S 35 and the German PzKpfw III. The duel forming the centrepiece of this book is history’s first great tank-versus-tank battle, the fighting at Hannut-Merdorp in Belgium on 12–13 May 1940. It is difficult today to recall the perspective of European tank designers of the late 1930s. Tank-versus-tank combat in World War II was so commonplace that it leads to the presumption that the tanks developed before 1939 had this type of combat as a primary technical requirement. In fact, this was not the case, especially with respect to the tanks built at the start of the arms race in the mid-1930s. While tanks were used in large numbers in the final year of fighting during World War I, there was only one known instance of tank-versus-tank combat. The primary function of tanks since World War I was to provide fire support to the infantry in overcoming enemy defensive positions, especially enemy machine-gun nests and trenches. As a result, tanks were armed with weapons appropriate to this mission, usually machine guns or low-velocity guns firing HE (high-explosive) projectiles. -
General Sir Rupert Smith, a British Army Paratrooper Who Commanded
LESSONS TO BE Maj Gen Jagatbir Singh, VSM (Retd) LEARNT FROM is an alumini of Doon School and St Stephens College. He retired in Feb 2018 UK’s DECISION and has been writing articles on Defence DILEMMA ON related issues for the Tribune and various journals. TANKS General Sir Rupert Smith, a British Army paratrooper who commanded the 1st Armoured Division in his book ‘Utility of Force’ wrote that; “Armies do not prepare for the last war, they frequently prepare for the wrong one- if for no other reason the governments will usually fund only the anticipated primary threat as opposed to the risk and the opponent will usually play to his opponents weakness (the risk) rather than the strength (the primary threat).” The debate in the UK, resulting in the decision to do away with their heavy tanks may well be traced to the comments of Gen Rupert Smith. Having delayed modernization of its main battle tank fleet, and now faced with the prospect of an expensive replacement, or costly upgrades, the UK is in a decision dilemma regarding the options available. In essence a tank is essentially a mobile weapon platform, with protection for its crew to enable it to move in an unhindered manner on the battlefield. The essential elements of a tank remain firepower or lethality; mobility or 2 maneuverability; and protection or survivability; along with their various sub systems which include communications and sensors. The design of the tank is essentially a careful blend of these factors. It is this balance of its three essential components that makes the critical difference in its effectiveness. -
What You Will Find Inside Great War
What you will find inside Great war THE GERMANS THE FRENCH Confident Veteran and Confident TrainedNew Reluctant Veteran Metropolitan Rifle Company. Infanteriekompanie. New Fearless Veteran Colonial Rifle Company. New Fearless Veteran Stosskompanie (Assault Company), With options for: the ultimate attacking company. • Flame-throwers With options for: • Machine-guns • Flame-throwers • Trench Mortars • Machine-guns • 37mm mle 1916 infantry guns – ROF 3 and AT 4 • 7.6cm Minenwerfers (mine-throwers or mortars) – ROF 2 and FP 2+ And supported by: • 75mm mle 1897 guns – ROF 2, AT 8 and 24” range The Infanteriekompanie can also field: • FT-17 tanks – with machine-gun or 37mm gun • 3.7cm TaK anti-tank guns – ROF 2 and AT 5 • Schneider CA.1 tanks – 2 MGs and an AT 5, ROF 2 gun • Granatenwerfers (Grenade throwers) – ROF 2 and FP 3+ • Char Saint Chamond tanks – 4 MGs and a 75mm mle 1897 And supported by: gun • 7.62cm infantry guns – ROF 2 and AT 5 • As well as options to field British tanks • 7.7cm artillery – ROF 2, AT 8and 24” range • A7V tanks – six MGs and ROF 2, AT 6 57.cm gun THE AMERICANS • Captured British tanks! New Confident Veteran 1st US Infantry Division (Big Red One) Rifle Company THE BRITISH New Confident Trained 42nd Infantry Division Rifle Confident Trained Line Division Rifle Company Company Confident Veteran Elite Division Rifle Company With options for: With options for: • Flame-throwers • Machine-guns • Machine-guns • Trench Mortars • Trench Mortars • 37mm mle 1916 infantry guns – ROF 3 and AT 4 And supported by: • Mark A Whippet