DOCSLIB.ORG

Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests –Travel Analysis Report Page 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests –Travel Analysis Report Page 2 Contents I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 3 A. Objectives of Forest-Wide Transportation System Analysis Process (TAP) ...................................... 3 B. Analysis Participants and Process ..................................................................................................... 3 C. Overview of the Francis Marion National Forest Road System ........................................................ 5 D. Key Issues, Benefits, Problems and Risks, and Management Opportunities Identified ................... 5 E. Forest Plans and Roads ..................................................................................................................... 7 F. Comparison of Existing System to Maintained Road System as Proposed by the TAP .................. 10 II. Context ................................................................................................................................................ 10 A. Alignment with National and Regional Objectives ......................................................................... 10 B. Coordination with Forest Plan ........................................................................................................ 11 C. Budget and Political Realities .......................................................................................................... 11 D. 2012 Transportation Bill Effects (MAP-21) ..................................................................................... 11 E. Alignment with Watershed Condition Framework (WCF) .............................................................. 12 III. Overview of the FMS and the supporting Transportation System ................................................. 13 A. General Description of the FMS Land Ownership Patterns, Land Use and Historic Travel Routes 13 Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 20 Appendix A – Map of the Existing Road System. .................................................................................... 21 Appendix B – Map of the Unneeded Roads. ........................................................................................... 21 Appendix C – Motor Vehicle Use Maps. ................................................................................................. 21 Appendix D – Existing Road System Benefits and Risks .......................................................................... 22 Appendix E – Existing Road System and Suggested MRS showing Maintenance Costs ......................... 23 Appendix F – Comparison of Existing and Suggested Minimum Road System Miles by Maintenance Level ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 Appendix G – Chief’s Letter .................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix H – Southern Region’s Expectations ....................................................................................... 34 Appendix I – Other .................................................................................................................................. 41 Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests –Travel Analysis Report Page 2 I. Executive Summary A. Objectives of Forest-Wide Transportation System Analysis Process (TAP) The objectives of Forest-Wide TAP conducted were to: - identify key issues related to the Francis Marion National Forest (Forest) transportation system, in particular affordability and cumulative effects; - identify benefits, problems and risks related to the Forest’s transportation system; - identify management opportunities related to the existing transportation system to suggest for future consideration as National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decisions (examples included items such as road decommissioning within priority watersheds and needed aquatic passage improvement projects); - create a map to inform the identification of the future Minimum Road System (MRS); - indicate the location of unneeded roads and possible new road needs. (Note: Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR 212.5(b) (1) requires the Forest Service to identify the minimum road system needed for safe and efficient travel and for administration, utilization and protection of National Forest System (NFS) lands.) B. Analysis Participants and Process The TAP was conducted by interdisciplinary teams (IDTs) made up of District and Supervisor’s Office resource specialists and the District Ranger for each ranger district. An Access database and interactive system road map was developed for each ranger district. Use of the Access database allowed for consistent evaluation of information and for generating any reports needed. Access databases were developed individually for each district and then compiled into one database with summary information provided in this report. Appendix D describes the risk and benefit categories and scoring system used by the IDT to evaluate each road on all four districts. Risk and benefit criteria were developed based on ongoing interaction with the public with district employees. The IDT rated each road based on the criteria identified in Appendix D. The IDT then met to discuss the rationale used in making individual road risk and benefit determinations. Recommendations on each road were made by the IDT to the appropriate district ranger who was also present at the meetings. Recommendations were determined based on continued implementation of the current Forest Plans. The Access database contains the following information on each road: Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests –Travel Analysis Report Page 3 • Risk/Benefit Rating (refer to appendix D for an explanation of criteria used) • Objective maintenance level • Operational maintenance level • Proposed maintenance level recommendation from IDT and Ranger agreement • Minimum road system1 • Existing road cost • Proposed road cost (reflecting recommended changes) • Existing route information from INFRA • Comments Appendix I includes a narrative evaluation of each ranger district relative to ecological, social and economic considerations using the publication Roads Analysis: Informing Decisions about Managing the National Forest Transportation System (FS-643). The IDT participants were: Name Position Amy Fore Francis Marion Natural Resource Assistant Beth LeMaster Enoree District Ranger Bill Hammond Assistant Fire Management Officer Bill Hansen Forest Hydrologist Bill Twomey Francis Marion District Silviculturist Danny Carlson Francis Marion Biological Technician Geoffrey Holden Forest GIS Coordinator Glen Kansanback Long Cane Natural Resource Specialist Hector Socias Enoree Forest Planner Jannah Dupre Deputy Director Sewee Visitor Center Jason Jennings Forest Soil Scientist Jay Purnell Forest Silviculturist Jeanne Riley Forest Fisheries Biologist Jeff Magniez Sumter Zone Wildlife Biologist Jim Knibbs Forest Environmental Coordinator, TAP Team Leader John Hodges Enoree Engineering Technician JR Kirkaldie Long Cane District Ranger LaRue Bryant Forest Engineer Marcus Beasley Assistant Fire Management Officer Mark Danaher Francis Marion Wildlife Biologist Mike Crane Andrew Pickens District Ranger Orlando Sutton Francis Marion District Ranger Randall Phillips Long Cane Engineering Technician Robbin Cooper Forest Landscape Architect Robin Mackie Forest Botanist/Ecologist 1 Determination of the minimum road system was based on the determination: Is the road being evaluated needed to implement the current Forest Plan? Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests –Travel Analysis Report Page 4 Name Position Sandra Wilkins Francis Marion Engineering Technician Steve Cobb Enoree Forest Technician Todd Bennett Enoree Forest Technician (Fire) C. Overview of the Francis Marion National Forest Road System The Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests (FMS) road system currently comprises 1,648 miles, providing access to national forest system lands, as well as to interspersed private tracts and nearby local communities. The system currently supports public recreation, resource management and is an integral part of the transportation infrastructure for adjacent communities and private landowners. It is comprised of a combination of old “public” roads and roads constructed to primarily access timber but also provide other resource management benefits. Road types range from double lane paved roads to single lane gravel or native surface roads that are used by passenger cars and some designated as suitable only for high clearance vehicles. Funding for the construction or reconstruction of all types was generally either provided by congressional appropriations, or authorized as a component of a timber sale. Maintenance funding is primarily by congressional appropriations, although timber sales generally funds any maintenance required during the life of a particular sale operation. D. Key Issues, Benefits, Problems and Risks, and Management Opportunities Identified The inter-disciplinary team (IDT) used an analytical approach to evaluate risks and benefits associated with the Forest road system. The analysis was completed in an “Access” database and is integrated with a district road map. Ecological, social and economic considerations relative to the Forest transportation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview
    United States Department of Agriculture Cultural Resources Overview F.orest Service National Forests in Mississippi Jackson, mMississippi CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE NATIONAL FORESTS IN MISSISSIPPI Compiled by Mark F. DeLeon Forest Archaeologist LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING NATIONAL FORESTS IN MISSISSIPPI USDA Forest Service 100 West Capitol Street, Suite 1141 Jackson, Mississippi 39269 September 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures and Tables ............................................... iv Acknowledgements .......................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 Cultural Resources Cultural Resource Values Cultural Resource Management Federal Leadership for the Preservation of Cultural Resources The Development of Historic Preservation in the United States Laws and Regulations Affecting Archaeological Resources GEOGRAPHIC SETTING ................................................ 11 Forest Description and Environment PREHISTORIC OUTLINE ............................................... 17 Paleo Indian Stage Archaic Stage Poverty Point Period Woodland Stage Mississippian Stage HISTORICAL OUTLINE ................................................ 28 FOREST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................. 35 Timber Practices Land Exchange Program Forest Engineering Program Special Uses Recreation KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE FOREST........... 41 Bienville National Forest Delta National Forest DeSoto National Forest ii KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE
    [Show full text]
  • Sumter National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan
    Revised Land and Resource Management Plan United States Department of Agriculture Sumter National Forest Forest Service Southern Region Management Bulletin R8-MB 116A January 2004 Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Sumter National Forest Abbeville, Chester, Edgefield, Fairfield, Greenwood, Laurens, McCormick, Newberry, Oconee, Saluda, and Union Counties Responsible Agency: USDA–Forest Service Responsible Official: Robert Jacobs, Regional Forester USDA–Forest Service Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, GA 33067-9102 For Information Contact: Jerome Thomas, Forest Supervisor 4931 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29212-3530 Telephone: (803) 561-4000 January 2004 The picnic shelter on the cover was originally named the Charles Suber Recreational Unit and was planned in 1936. The lake and picnic area including a shelter were built in 1938-1939. The original shelter was found inadequate and a modified model B-3500 shelter was constructed probably by the CCC from camp F-6 in 1941. The name of the recreation area was changed in 1956 to Molly’s Rock Picnic Area, which was the local unofficial name. The name originates from a sheltered place between and under two huge boulders once inhabited by an African- American woman named Molly. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021
    1 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 Alabama Tuskegee, National Forests in Alabama, dates 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Darrius Truss, [email protected] 404-550-5114 Double Springs, National Forests in Alabama, 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Shane Hoskins, [email protected] 334-314- 4522 Alaska Juneau, Tongass National Forest / Admiralty Island National Monument, 6/14/2021--8/13/2021 Project Contact: Don MacDougall, [email protected] 907-789-6280 Arizona Douglas, Coronado National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contacts: Doug Ruppel and Brian Stultz, [email protected] and [email protected] 520-388-8438 Prescott, Prescott National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Nina Hubbard, [email protected] 928- 232-0726 Phoenix, Tonto National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Brooke Wheelock, [email protected] 602-225-5257 Arkansas Glenwood, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501-701-3570 Mena, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501- 701-3570 California Mount Shasta, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 6/28/2021--8/6/2021, Project Contact: Marcus Nova, [email protected] 530-926-9606 Etna, Klamath National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/31/2021, Project Contact: Jeffrey Novak, [email protected] 530-841- 4467 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 2 Colorado Grand Junction, Grand Mesa Uncomphagre and Gunnison National Forests, 6/7/2021--8/14/2021 Project Contact: Lacie Jurado, [email protected] 970-817-4053, 2 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Profile: Quercus Oglethorpensis
    Conservation Gap Analysis of Native U.S. Oaks Species profile: Quercus oglethorpensis Emily Beckman, Matt Lobdell, Abby Meyer, Murphy Westwood SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHWESTERN U.S. SOUTHEASTERN U.S. Channel Island endemics: Texas limited-range endemics State endemics: Quercus pacifica, Quercus tomentella Quercus carmenensis, Quercus acerifolia, Quercus boyntonii Quercus graciliformis, Quercus hinckleyi, Southern region: Quercus robusta, Quercus tardifolia Concentrated in Florida: Quercus cedrosensis, Quercus dumosa, Quercus chapmanii, Quercus inopina, Quercus engelmannii Concentrated in Arizona: Quercus pumila Quercus ajoensis, Quercus palmeri, Northern region and / Quercus toumeyi Broad distribution: or broad distribution: Quercus arkansana, Quercus austrina, Quercus lobata, Quercus parvula, Broad distribution: Quercus georgiana, Quercus sadleriana Quercus havardii, Quercus laceyi Quercus oglethorpensis, Quercus similis Quercus oglethorpensis W.H.Duncan Synonyms: N/A Common Names: Oglethorpe oak Species profile co-author: Matt Lobdell, The Morton Arboretum Suggested citation: Beckman, E., Lobdell, M., Meyer, A., & Westwood, M. (2019). Quercus oglethorpensis W.H.Duncan. In Beckman, E., Meyer, A., Man, G., Pivorunas, D., Denvir, A., Gill, D., Shaw, K., & Westwood, M. Conservation Gap Analysis of Native U.S. Oaks (pp. 152-157). Lisle, IL: The Morton Arboretum. Retrieved from https://www.mortonarb.org/files/species-profile-quercus-oglethorpensis.pdf Figure 1. County-level distribution map for Quercus oglethorpensis. Source: Biota of North America Program (BONAP).4 Matt Lobdell DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY Quercus oglethorpensis, or Oglethorpe oak, has a disjointed distribution across the southern U.S. Smaller clusters of localities exist in northeastern Louisiana, southeastern Mississippi, and southwestern Alabama, and a more extensive and well-known distribution extends from northeastern Georgia across the border into South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Forests Endangered Freedoms America’S 10 Endangered National Forests Foreword Dr
    Endangered Forests Endangered Freedoms America’s 10 Endangered National Forests Foreword Dr. Edward O. Wilson The past two years have witnessed a renewed clash of two opposing views on the best use of America’s national forests. The Bush administration, seeing the forests as a resource for economic growth, has proposed a dramatic increase in resource extraction. Operating on the premise that logging is important to the national economy and to jobs in the national forests, it evidently feels justified in muting or outright overriding the provision of the 1976 National Forest Management Act (NFMA) that explains forest plans "provide for diversity of plant and animal communities." In contrast, and in defense of NFMA, environmental scientists continue to argue that America’s national forests are a priceless reservoir of biological diversity and an aesthetic and historic treasure. In this view, they represent a public trust too valuable to be managed as tree farms for the production of pulp, paper and lumber. Scientists have reached a deeper understanding of the value of the National Forest System that needs to be kept front and center. Each forest is a unique combination of thousands of kinds of plants, animals and microorganisms locked together in seemingly endless webs and competitive and cooperative relationships. It is this biological diversity that creates a healthy ecosystem, a self-assembled powerhouse that generates clean water and fresh air without human intervention and free of charge. Each species of a forest, or any other natural ecosystem, is a masterpiece of evolution, exquisitely well adapted to the environment it inhabits.
    [Show full text]
  • State Line Burn
    State Line Burn: Collaboration Across the Border of FLN North and South Carolina Fire Learning Network Southern Blue Ridge Escarpment FLN Notes from the Field January 26, 2018 An Interview with Brian Browning by Cynthia Fowler and Kaycia Best Brian Browning is the fire management officer for the Nantahala Ranger District of the Nantahala National Forest. Cynthia Fowler is a professor of anthropology and the chair of the Sociology and Anthropology Department at Wofford College in Spartanburg, South Carolina. Kaycia Best is a student at Wofford College, double majoring in sociology-anthropology and biology. Conducting a controlled burn across national forest boundaries and state lines requires cooperation and a well-oiled team of fire managers. The multiagency team that conducted the State Line Burn had the esprit de corps to successfully implement a prescribed fire in the mountainous terrain of the Nantahala Ranger District in North Carolina’s Nantahala National Forest and the Andrew Pickens Ranger District in South Carolina’s feet Sumter National Forest. The 1,762-acre burn included 956 0 1100 2200 acres in North Carolina and 806 acres in South Carolina. We spoke with burn boss Brian Browning about what made it work. What stands out about the State Line Burn? What is unique about this burn is that it crossed boundaries. Our team in the Nantahala district in North Carolina and our friends in the Andrew Pickens in South Carolina were looking for opportunities where we logistically could do a prescribed the botanist about this as a good area, we asked, Do you burn. Between our districts, we found a piece of property feel comfortable with fire being in this area? You have those where there is a state line but no break in national forest lands.
    [Show full text]
  • USFS Land Acquisition Strategy South Carolina
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Land Ownership Adjustment Strategy Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests June 2005 South Carolina The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Recommended by: __________________________ Orlando Sutton, District Ranger Francis Marion National Forest ____________________________ Richard Rosemier, District Ranger Enoree District, Sumter National Forest __________________________ Mike Crane, District Ranger Andrew Pickens District, Sumter National Forest _____________________________ Elizabeth LeMaster, District Ranger Long Cane District, Sumter National Forest ______________________________ Stephen Wells, FLM Staff Officer Supervisor’s Office Approved by: ____________________________ Jerome Thomas, Forest Supervisor Francis Marion and Sumter National
    [Show full text]
  • Sumter National Forest Andrew Pickens Ranger District Camping
    Andrew Pickens Ranger Sumter National Forest District Camping Guide U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region January 2012 The Andrew Pickens Ranger District has a wide Whetstone Horse Camp range of camping opportunities from developed Whetstone Horse Camp has 18 sites. Fees are $12/ campgrounds to primitive and backcountry sites. night for single sites, and $24/night for double sites . Nine sites are first come, first served; the other nine sites are available only by reservation. Reservations may be made online at www.recreation.gov Developed Campsites or by calling 877-444-6777.Water, tables and grills are available. This campground accommodates horses Cherry Hill Recreation Area but is available to all campers. Information on the Cherry Hill Recreation Area has 29 sites, some of horse trail is available at the ranger station. which are suitable for recreational vehicles. This campground has restrooms with flush toilets, hot showers and a trailer dump station. The fee for Primitive Campsites camping is $10/night. Twelve sites are first come, first These small campsites have few, if any, facilities. served, the other seventeen sites are available only Saddle, pack and draft animals are not permitted at be reservation. Reservations may be made online at any primitive campsite except Riley Moore Ford and www.recreation.gov or by calling 877-444-6777. Tamassee camps. King Creek: Beginning at Highway 107, travel west Burrell’s Ford on the Burrell’s Ford road about .5 mile. Turn right Burrell’s Ford is open year round with no charge. (north) on a dirt road and travel about 100 yards to A pit toilet, picnic tables, fire rings, and lantern the campsite next to King’s Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 Thru FY2016
    Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 thru FY2016 Benson Teresa FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Briscoe Caren FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Carlson Ann FS Lassen National Forest FY14 Christiansen Donn FS Cleveland National Forest FY14 Donald Michael FS Plumas National Forest FY14 Ewing Rebecca FS Mark Twain National Forest FY14 Gosse Michael FS Ocala National Forest FY14 Herrera Macario FS Allegheny National Forest FY14 Hutchins Michael FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Jackson William FS Green Mountain National Forest FY14 Kelley Keith FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Maercklein Mary FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 McCombs Matthew FS Pisgah National Forest FY14 McCoy Jim FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 Morgan Leslie FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Morris JaSal FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Moynihan Megan FS Ouachita National Forest FY14 Napper Carolyn FS Shasta-Trinity National Forest FY14 Nedlo Jason FS Daniel Boone National Forest FY14 Pentecost Mark FS Superior National Forest FY14 Petersen Brittany FWS Bon Secour NWR FY14 Russell Scott FS Coconino National Forest FY14 Schroyer Karen FS Dixie National Forest FY14 Shinn Jeffrey FS Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests FY14 Skustad Carl FS Superior National Forest FY14 Steele Kurtis FS Superior National Forest FY14 Stresser Susan FS Shoshone National Forest FY14 Walker Erick FS Idaho Panhandle National Forest FY14 Watson Alfred FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Yoshina Dean FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Alfred Roderick FS Inyo National
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina's Statewide Forest Resource Assessment and Strategy
    South Carolina’s Statewide Forest Resource Assessment and Strategy Conditions, Trends, Threats, Benefits, and Issues June 2010 Funding source Funding for this project was provided through a grant from the USDA Forest Service. USDA Nondiscrimination Statement “The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.” A Message from the State Forester South Carolina is blessed with a rich diversity of forest resources. Comprising approximately 13 million acres, these forests range from hardwood coves in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains to maritime forests along the Atlantic Coast. Along with this diversity comes a myriad of benefits that these forests provide as well as a range of challenges that threaten their very existence. One of the most tangible benefits is the economic impact of forestry, contributing over $17.4 billion to the state’s economy and providing nearly 45,000 jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County
    Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage Alabama 1st Escambia Conecuh National Forest 29,179 1st Totals 29,179 2nd Coffee Pea River Land Utilization Project 40 Covington Conecuh National Forest 54,881 2nd Totals 54,921 3rd Calhoun Rose Purchase Unit 161 Talladega National Forest 21,412 Cherokee Talladega National Forest 2,229 Clay Talladega National Forest 66,763 Cleburne Talladega National Forest 98,750 Macon Tuskegee National Forest 11,348 Talladega Talladega National Forest 46,272 3rd Totals 246,935 4th Franklin William B. Bankhead National Forest 1,277 Lawrence William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,681 Winston William B. Bankhead National Forest 90,030 4th Totals 181,988 6th Bibb Talladega National Forest 60,867 Chilton Talladega National Forest 22,986 6th Totals 83,853 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 6 - NFS Acreage by State, Congressional District and County State Congressional District County Unit NFS Acreage 7th Dallas Talladega National Forest 2,167 Hale Talladega National Forest 28,051 Perry Talladega National Forest 32,796 Tuscaloosa Talladega National Forest 10,998 7th Totals 74,012 Alabama Totals 670,888 Alaska At Large Anchorage Municipality Chugach National Forest 248,417 Haines Borough Tongass National Forest 767,952 Hoonah-Angoon Census Area Tongass National Forest 1,974,292 Juneau City and Borough Tongass National Forest 1,672,846 Kenai Peninsula Borough Chugach National Forest 1,261,067 Ketchikan Gateway Borough Tongass
    [Show full text]