DOCSLIB.ORG

No Easy Answers RIGHTS Sex Offender Laws in the US WATCH September 2007 Volume 19, No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No Easy Answers RIGHTS Sex Offender Laws in the US WATCH September 2007 Volume 19, No United States HUMAN No Easy Answers RIGHTS Sex Offender Laws in the US WATCH September 2007 Volume 19, No. 4(G) No Easy Answers Sex Offender Laws in the US Acknowledgements.................................................................................................. 1 I. Summary..............................................................................................................2 Public Safety and Mistaken Premises..................................................................4 Over-breadth of the Registration Requirement.....................................................5 Unrestricted Access to Registry Information........................................................ 6 Residency Restrictions ........................................................................................7 Juvenile Offenders.............................................................................................. 8 Are the Laws Counterproductive? ....................................................................... 9 US Sex Offender Policies: Alone in the World.....................................................10 Rethinking Sex Offender Laws........................................................................... 11 II. Methodology...................................................................................................... 13 III. Recommendations ............................................................................................ 15 Adam Walsh Act................................................................................................ 15 State Sex Offender Registries ............................................................................ 15 Community Notification .................................................................................... 17 Residency Restrictions ......................................................................................19 Treatment, Research, and Education .................................................................20 IV. Sexual Violence in the United States.................................................................21 Sexual Violence ................................................................................................ 21 Danger from Strangers?.....................................................................................24 High Rates of Recidivism? .................................................................................25 Case Study: North Carolina ............................................................................... 31 Treatment .........................................................................................................33 V. Sex Offender Registration Laws .........................................................................35 The Role of Federal Law.....................................................................................35 State Registration Laws.....................................................................................38 How Bad Can Registration Be? Chris F.’s Story ...................................................43 Do Registries Help Law Enforcement?................................................................44 Rethinking Registration.....................................................................................46 VI. Public Access to Information on Sex Offenders..................................................47 Legislative History.............................................................................................48 Community Notification by Law Enforcement.....................................................49 Internet Registries: Expanding Community Notification to the World..................53 State Internet Registries....................................................................................54 Does Community Notification Work?..................................................................58 Is Community Notification Counterproductive? ..................................................62 Rethinking Community Notification: Vermont as a Model ..................................62 A Model Registration and Community Notification Program: Minnesota .............63 VII. Sex Offender Laws and Child Offenders............................................................65 Children as Sex Offenders.................................................................................67 Jim T.’s story ..................................................................................................... 71 Consensual Teenage Sex...................................................................................72 Case Study: Dan M.’s story................................................................................74 Adjudicated Youth on Public Registries: Sealed Records “Unsealed” by Sex Offender Laws...................................................................................................75 Rethinking Sex Offender Laws for Juvenile Offenders.........................................77 VIII. Consequences of Registration and Community Notification Laws for Registrants and Their Loved Ones.............................................................................................78 Case study: Walter D. ....................................................................................... 80 Privacy............................................................................................................. 80 Employment......................................................................................................81 Vigilante Violence ............................................................................................ 86 Living Peacefully at Home .................................................................................92 Suicide and Despair..........................................................................................97 IX. Residency Restriction Laws.............................................................................100 Iowa ............................................................................................................... 104 Oklahoma.......................................................................................................109 Georgia........................................................................................................... 110 California........................................................................................................ 112 Local Ordinances .............................................................................................114 Do Residency Restrictions Protect Public Safety?..............................................115 Impact on Family Unity.....................................................................................117 Rethinking Residency Restrictions................................................................... 118 Other Countries and Sex Offender Laws........................................................... 118 X. Human Rights and Sex Offender Laws .............................................................. 119 Special Rights of Child Offenders .................................................................... 121 A Human Rights Analysis of US Sex Offender Laws .......................................... 122 Sex Offenders Laws in US Courts..................................................................... 125 XI. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 130 Appendix ............................................................................................................. 132 Acknowledgements Human Rights Watch would like to thank all of the survivors of sexual violence, former offenders and their families, social workers, advocates, law enforcement officials, and attorneys who shared their experiences and perspective with us for this report. We are especially grateful to those who trusted us with very painful and personal stories. Corinne Carey, former researcher for the US Program, undertook the original research for this report. The report was written by Sarah Tofte with the assistance of Jamie Fellner, director of the US Program, who also edited the report. Dr. Patrick Vinck, director of the Berkeley-Tulane Initiative on Vulnerable Populations at the Human Rights Center, University of California-Berkeley, tabulated the data for Human Rights Watch’s study of North Carolina’s online sex offender registry. Ashoka Mukpo, US Program Associate, and US Program interns Anjali Balasingham, Andrea Barrow, Madeline Gressel, and Kari White provided important research assistance. Zama Coursen-Neff, acting deputy director of the Children’s Rights Division and Janet Walsh, acting director of the Women’s Rights Division, reviewed the report. Ian Gorvin, deputy director of the Program Office, and Aisling Reidy, senior legal counsel, edited the report. Ashoka Mukpo, Grace Choi, and Andrea Holley provided invaluable production assistance. We want to acknowledge our special gratitude to Patty Wetterling, Alisa Klein, Jim Rensel, Nancy Daley, Dr. Robert Prentky, and Dr. Levenson for providing guidance and insights in helping us to shape the research and writing of this report. Dr. Richard Tewksbury, Dr. Levenson, and Ms. Wetterling also reviewed the report. Human Rights Watch would also like to thank Peter B. Lewis, the Open Society Institute, and the John Merck Foundation, all of whom generously support the work of the US Program. 1 Human
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Members 110Th Congress
    1101 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005-3586 (202) 289-3903 FAX: (202) 371-0197 wpllc.net New Members of Congress Listed below are the newly elected members of Congress. Where available, we’ve included information on their backgrounds and from their campaign platforms that indicates an interest in education issues. Members are grouped by state, which are listed alphabetically. Senate Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) Defeated: current Maryland Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele (R) Stance on Education Issues: Cardin believes “that educating our children must be a priority at every level of government.” Cardin opposes school vouchers and pledges to work “towards making college more affordable, repairing our schools, standing up for our teachers’ needs, and the federal government fulfills its promises to fund important educational programs for our children.” His campaign web site emphasizes quality teachers in every classroom, the affordability of college, safe and healthy schools and adequate funding for NCLB, Head Start, and special education. Education Connection: Cardin’s wife, Myrna, was an educator, teaching fourth grade, later tutoring a student with dyslexia as a volunteer member of the Board the Dyslexia Tutoring Program, and then served for eight years as the Executive Director of the Maryland Association of Non-Public Special Education Facilities. More information can be found at: http://www.bencardin.com/issues?id=0004 Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Defeated: Rep. Mark Kennedy to replace retiring Sen. Mark Dayton (D) Stance on Education Issues: Klobuchar believes in fully funding NCLB and will fight to improve early childhood education. Her campaign web site also asserts her commitment to adequate access to grants and loans for higher education, citing in the skyrocketing costs of college tuition.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Missing Child Guide for Law Enforcement
    Long-term missing child guide for law enforcement: Strategies for finding long-term missing children Long-term missing child guide for law enforcement: Strategies for finding long-term missing children 2016 Edited by Robert G. Lowery, Jr., and Robert Hoever National Center for Missing & Exploited Children® www.missingkids.org 1-800-THE-LOST® or 1-800-843-5678 ORI VA007019W Copyright © 2016 National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. All rights reserved. This project was supported by Grant No. 2015-MC-CX-K001 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. This document is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or professional opinion about specific facts. Information provided in this document may not remain current or accurate, so recipients should use this document only as a starting point for their own independent research and analysis. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. CyberTipline®, National Center for Missing & Exploited Children®, 1-800-THE-LOST® and Project ALERT® are registered trademarks of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. LONG-TERM MISSING CHILD GUIDE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT - 2 Contents Acknowledgments.....10 Letter from John Walsh.....15 Foreword by Patty Wetterling.....16 Chapter 1: Introduction by Robert G. Lowery, Jr......18 Quick reference.....18 We are finding more long-term missing children now.....19 Are we doing enough?.....21 Chapter 2: Overview of missing children cases by Robert G.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob Found September 4, 2016 Almost 27 Years After the Abduction
    Authorities confirm: Jacob found September 4, 2016 Almost 27 years after the abduction of Jacob Wetterling just outside St. Joseph, a long trail of investigation appears to be near its end. The Stearns County Sheriff's Office confirmed Saturday evening that Wetterling's remains have been found. The Ramsey County Medical Examiner and a forensic dentist identified Wetterling's remains earlier in the day. nvestigators and prosecutors are "reviewing and evaluating new evidence" in the investigation and more detailed information is expected to be provided early next week, according to the sheriff's office. Danny Heinrich, a person of interest in the case, cooperated in the investigation, according to reports that first came from KSTP-TV. Jacob's mother, Patty Wetterling, said Saturday morning that her son's remains have been found. ?All I can confirm is that Jacob has been found and our hearts are broken. I am not responding to any media yet as I have no words,? she said in a message to KARE-TV. Authorities recovered unidentified remains this week after Danny Heinrich, who is a person of interest in the disappearance of Jacob Wetterling, agreed to cooperate and provide information, according to authorities. In a message to the St. Cloud Times, she said "we will have words at some point." Stearns County Chief Deputy Bruce Bechtold and County Attorney Janelle Kendall declined to comment Saturday. Bechtold is the lead investigator in the Wetterling case. Several messages left for Sheriff John Sanner were not immediately returned. The FBI is not in the position to confirm any details regarding the matter, said Kyle Loven, chief division counsel at the Minneapolis office.
    [Show full text]
  • Be They Fish Or Not Fish: the Fishy Registration of Nonsexual Offenders Ofer Raban
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 16 | Issue 2 Article 5 Be They fish or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration of Nonsexual Offenders Ofer Raban Repository Citation Ofer Raban, Be They fish or Not Fish: The Fishy Registration of Nonsexual Offenders, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 497 (2007), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol16/iss2/5 Copyright c 2007 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj BE THEY FISH OR NOT FISH: THE FISHY REGISTRATION OF NONSEXUAL OFFENDERS Ofer Raban* A "Fish" means any creature of the sea, be it fish or not fish.' A "Sex crime" means . Kidnapping in the first degree if the victim was under 18 years of age.2 INTRODUCTION In 1989, Wing Dong Moi, an eighteen-year-old member of a Manhattan China- town gang, pled guilty to kidnapping in the second degree in a case involving the murder of two rival gang members.3 The two victims, ages fifteen and sixteen, were taken off an ice-skating rink, pushed into a car, driven to Westchester County (which adjoins New York City) and, a few hours later, were shot dead-apparently at the orders of the gang leader.4 Moi claimed that he only helped put the victims in the car, that he was not involved in any of the subsequent events, and that he was not aware that the victims would be killed.5 The prosecution agreed to a kidnapping plea (a plea consistent with Moi's claims), and Moi was sentenced to two to six-and-a- half years in prison.6 He was released from prison in 1991.7 In 1996, Moi was notified that he was required to register as a "level three" (highest risk) sex offender for life under New York's newly enacted Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA).8 The Act defined the kidnapping of a victim less than seventeen years of age as a sex offense.9 Moi became a registered sex offender.'° * Visiting Professor, University of Utah S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Firehouse Referendum Judgement
    A.J':; OFFICE btJ'j4t;{·,j~JLl Vt:J~llr·iur- t"-IUI'f "-,UUr;.1 Dec 21 2010 1~::5G P,02 PREPARED BY TH:E COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY JOHN STEVEN WOERNER, ANNE LAW DIVISION PA.t~COAST and MAUREEN P. ATLANTIC COUNTY DOlJGHERTY, Plaintiffs, Docket No. ATL~L-6154-10 v. Civil Action THOMA.'S D. HILTN£R, io his capacity FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING as the CLERK of the City of Margate SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO City, the CITY of MARGATE CITY and DEF'ENDANTS AND DENYING COMMISSIONERS of tbe CITY of PLAINTIFFS' CROSS~MOTION MARGATE CITY, FOR Slll\1MARY JlJDGMENT Defendants. n·ns ivlATfER, having bt'en opened to the; Court by Mary C, Siracusa, Esquire, attorney for Defendants, Thomas D, liiltner, in bis capacity D.;; Clerk for the City of Margate, the City of Margate and the Commissioners of the City of Mllrgate, by way of a Motion for SurnJllllry Judgment seeking an Order declaring that N.J,S.A 40:74-5 is the law controlling in this matter; that OrdinilJ>.ce No. 20] 0-27 shall beoome effective immediately; that PiE.intiff s Petition to submit Ordinance No, 2010-27 to referendum is Insufficient alld defective and of flO force and effect; that the City Cl~rk acted properly and lawfully in celtifying that Plaintitrs Petition WIIS insufficient nnd defecTive; and dismissing P\ajntiffs complaint with pr~judice; and Plaintiffs hti.ving filed opposition to tile motiQn by their ;'lttcmw),s Moure-en DDugherty, Esquire and Christian M. Scheuennan, Esquir~ (The Benan L,1:W Finn, r.c.), 3J1d the Court having reviewed aU pleadings tiled herein and having heard oral argument on December 17,2010, and for The reason:> !let forth in a v,Titten Memorandum of Decision dated Dec~mber 21 , 20 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Political Ethics and Public Style in the Early Career of Jersey City’s Frank Hague Matthew Taylor Raffety1 Abstract This essay charts the political rise of Frank Hague, Jersey City's infamous mayor from 1917-1947. Although most historical attention focuses on his long tenure as mayor, Hague's pre-mayoral career provides an instructive example of how urban politicians used public spectacle, the media, ethnic identity, and middle class mores to redefine American urban politics. Before becoming mayor, Hague crafted a public persona that appealed to both middle-class and working-class ethnic voters by reinventing himself as a Progressive while still retaining the showmanship and personal appeals of machine politics. Hague straddled two distinct political traditions, presenting himself simultaneously as a "pol," rooted in the historical mores of the ―Horseshoe,‖ his home neighborhood, as well as a good government advocate, appealing to Jersey City's native-born middle class—focusing on clean water, public safety, and personal responsibility. In doing so, Hague provided a template for ethnic reform mayors who followed, from Fiorello LaGuardia and Richard Daley to Rudolph Giuliani and Ed Rendell. ―For better or worse, he knew how to run a show.‖2 Of all the political bosses who ruled the cities of the American East and Midwest at the beginning of the twentieth century, perhaps none was as feared, demonized, and beloved as Frank Hague of Jersey City, New Jersey (Figure 1). Curiously, however, the man who commanded the attention of contemporaries has received scant attention since his machine was ―buried‖ with a symbolic funeral in May of 1949.3 Contemporaries and historians describe Hague (1876-1956) as the archetypal American political boss.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Session –Monday, 12/17/12
    Work Session –Monday, 12/17/12 Present: Commissioners Frias, Vargas, Wiley and Mayor Roque Absent: Commissioner Rodriguez Also Present: Town Attorney Gil Garcia, Town Clerk Carmela Riccie, Deputy Town Clerk Yesenia Del Rio, Town Engineer Robert Russo (CME Associates), CFO Margaret Cherone and Town Administrator Joseph DeMarco The meeting commenced at 6:07 p.m. Town Clerk Carmela Riccie made the following announcement: As presiding officer of this regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Commissioners of the Town of West New York, held on December 17, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. (6:00 p.m. Work Session in the Mayor's Conference Room), I do hereby publicly announce, and I direct that this announcement shall be placed in the minutes of this meeting, and that the Notice requirements provided for in the “Open Public Meetings Act” have been satisfied. Notice of this meeting was properly given by the Board of Commissioners in the Resolution dated and adopted on December 20, 2011. Said Resolution was transmitted by the Town Clerk to the Jersey Journal and the Bergen Record and publicly posted on the Municipal Bulletin Board, Town Hall, and filed with the Town Clerk. Copies are available to the public in accordance with the law. Item No. 1: Approval of Minutes: Regular Meetings: 10/17/12 & 11/19/12 (Regular and Work Sessions): Comm. Wiley stated that his folder did not include the Work Session Minutes for November. Town Clerk Riccie advised that there are four sets of Minutes in each Commissioner’s folder. He commented that he didn’t have sufficient time to review his folder as he received it shortly before meeting commenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook for New Jersey Assessors
    Handbook For New Jersey Assessors PHIL MURPHY, Governor ELIZABETH MAHER MUOIO, State Treasurer Issued by Property Administration – Local Property Division of Taxation – Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Trenton, New Jersey Revised April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 April 2021 New Jersey Property Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights P.L. 2017, c.128 N.J.S.A. 54:1-2.1 Overview The Property Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights ensures that: 1. All property taxpayers are accorded the basic rights of fair and equitable treatment under the State Constitution and laws of New Jersey; 2. All property taxpayers receive the information and assistance they need to understand and meet their property tax responsibilities. Services to Property Taxpayers As a property taxpayer, you have the right to obtain information explained in simple, nontechnical terms about: Your responsibilities and rights as a property owner and property taxpayer; Your real property assessment and how it is determined and calculated; Your right to appeal and how to appeal an assessment you believe is incorrect as to your property or as to another property in the same county and the time limits involved; Your right, in the context of a property tax appeal, to view the property record card of other real property in the municipality. Responsiveness You have the right to expect questions will be responded to within a reasonable amount of time. Statements and Notices You have the right to expect all notices you receive will clearly identify the purpose of the communication and the proper procedure when responding. For More Information Many Local Property Tax forms and publications are available on the Division of Taxation’s website at: www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor - Council
    NEW JE:RSEY VOTERS MAYOR - COUNCIL ‘, I’ ..“.7”i ‘i / ,~:;“>.-p~“~..\ I ,.~” ,4 ) : i’., c-‘Cll--II.--- INC’II. - MANAGER.._._. ..___ -... / ‘+..1;, _t. yx .< ! ,,~_^- . “. _ __-___..*..,>~: ,,‘. “AXE _I- i.- MUNICIPAI, SEHVICES RECENTREPORTS OF THESTATE COMMISSION ON COUNTY AND MUNICIPALGOVERNMENT * Modem Forms of Municipal Government, May 1992 * The Delivery of Human ServicesWithin New Jersey,June 1990 * State and Local Government Codes: Strategiesfor Local Enforcement, May 1990 * Corrections Policy for the ‘9Os,May 1989 * Services for the Elderly: Current and Future Needs, October 1988 * Solid Waste Management in New Jersey,November 1987 * Optional Municipal Charter Law, October 1987 * Judicial Unification, July 1987 Local Redevelopmentin New Jersey: Structuring a New Partnership, January 1987 * The Structure of County Government: Current Status and Needs, July 1986 Local Govemment Liability Insurance: A Crisis, May 1986 Functional Fragmentation and the Traditional Forms of Municipal Government in New Jersey,January 1986 The Changing Structure of New Jersey Municipal Government, March 1985 (In cooperation with the Bureau of Government Research,Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) * County Mandates: The State Judicial System and Human Services,October 1984 New Jersey’s Local Infrastructure: An Assessmentof Needs, September 1984 * New Jersey Water Supply Handbook, December 1983 Green Acres in the ‘80s: Meeting New Jersey’sNeeds for @en Space and Recreation, June 1983 Optional Municipal Charter Law (Faulkner Act), as Amended,
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey News Facts a Absecon Allentown Andover Asbury
    New Jersey News Facts A Absecon Allentown Andover Asbury Park Atlantic City Atlantic Highlands Avalon Av enel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B Barnegat Basking Ridge Bayonne Bayville Beach Haven Bedminster Belle Mead Bellev ille Bellmawr Belmar Belvidere Bergenfield Berkeley Heights Berlin Bernardsville Blackwood Blairstown Bloomfield Boonton Bordentown Bound Brook Branchville Bric k Bridgeton Bridgewater Brigantine Budd Lake Burlington Butler -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C Caldwell Califon Camden Cape May Cape May Court House Carlstadt Carteret Cedar G rove Chatham Cherry Hill Chester Clark Clementon Cliffside Park Clifton Clinton Closter Collingswood Colonia Colts Neck Cranbury Cranford -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D Deal Denville Dover Dumont Dunellen -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E East Brunswick East Hanover East Orange East Rutherford Eatontown Edgewater Edis on Egg Harbor City Egg Harbor Township Elizabeth Elmer Elmwood Park Emerson Engl ewood Englewood Cliffs Englishtown -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- F Fair Lawn Fairfield Fairview Fanwood Farmingdale Flanders Flemington Florham Par k Forked River Fort Lee Franklin Franklin Lakes Franklin Park Franklinville Free hold Frenchtown -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- G Garfield Glassboro
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Forms of Municipal Government
    Chapter 1 Forms of Municipal Government 1-1 AUTHORITY OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT In the State of New Jersey, the authority of municipal government flows from the state. Any exercise of municipal power must be authorized by state law, primarily statute.1 Certain powers are granted by the state to all municipalities, and such authorizations may be termed “general law” because they apply generally to every municipality in New Jersey. Other powers, however, are extended only to certain forms of government. Accordingly, a municipality’s powers are determined in large part by its form of government. Ten forms of municipal government are currently authorized by statute, six of which pre-date the 1947 New Jersey State Constitution. The six pre-1947 forms of government are City, Town, Borough, Township, Village, and Commission.2 Four forms of government are authorized by the 1950 Optional Municipal Charter Law, namely the Mayor-Council Plan, the Council- Manager Plan, the Small Municipality Plan, and the Mayor- Council-Administrator Plan.3 Additionally, certain municipalities operate outside any of the statutory forms under special charters granted by the state.4 1. Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of Paterson, 83 N.J. 212, 225 (1980); Eastern Planned Cmty. at Lincroft, Inc. v. Middletown Twp., 235 N.J. Super. 467, 470 (Law Div. 1989). 2. See § 1-3 through § 1-8. 3. N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1 et seq.; see § 1-9. 4. See § 1-9:2. NEW JERSEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT DESKBOOK 2020 1 NJLJLocGov01Hed.indd 1 9/13/2019 4:49:33 PM Chapter 1 Forms of Municipal Government 1-2 CITY
    [Show full text]
  • Perth Amboy Evening News (Perth Amboy, N.J
    First Photos of Ruin Wrought by Forest Fires [NEW BOOKS in Michigan and Canada Costing About 250 Lives ST LIBRARY MONMOUTH COUNTY NEWS _ Non-Fiction and Fiction Rf- SAY NEW POINT COMFORT ctntly in Circulation. IN ARGUMENT BEACH NOT DANGEROUS SECURE BOAT The following are among the new books now In circulation at the Li- Special to the EVENING NEWS, brary: AT KEANSBURG Keansburg, July 15:—-The New FOR NEW LINE Non-Fiction. Point Comfort Beach officers when Collier—West In the East. '"This seen yesterday by an EVENING and volume of travels In India, China Clcs? fip* S representative denied that "Nassau" Will Run Fram Japan is quite out of the ordinary Association Would *eir beach was unsafe and not pro- because the author has had a chance tected In accordance with the laws, on to N. Y to see more of the real East than Things Up Sunday. and that the drowning accidents of Key port most Westerners who go there, and July 4 did not occur in deep water, because he knows how to make what Special to the EVENING NEWS. as was printed in a Newark paper a Special to the EVENING NEWS. he sees intelligible to the reader." Keansburg, July 15—Lengthy ar- j few days ago. W. A. Golhaus, presi- Keyport, July 15:—Final ar- Calcula- the would not are V .» Colvln—Machine Shop for and tne closing dent of company, dlsj- rangements said to have been <■:^^ ^ ^ gumentB against tions. "Simple mathematics applied of business places and the shutting cuss the matter at length but may mads with Mr.
    [Show full text]