November 2016, at the Showground, Winthorpe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021
Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek -
Nottingham City Council
Greater Nottingham and Ashfield Outline Water Cycle Study Final Report February 2010 Creating the environment for business Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Entec (© Entec UK Limited 2010) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Entec under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Entec. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third-party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Entec at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third-party who is able to access it by any means. Entec excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability. -
River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector. -
Fiskerton Cum Morton Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033 Consultation
Fiskerton cum Morton Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033 Consultation Statement Part 2: List of Regulation 14 Comments, Responses and Changes April 2019 Table of Content 1. Regulation 14 Pre-submission Consultation 3 2. Statutory Consultees’ Comments 5 3. Responses and Changes to Statutory Consultees’ Comment 11 4. Non-Statutory Consultees’ Comments 26 5. Responses and Changes to Non-Statutory Consultees’ Comments 62 Fiskerton cum Morton Neighbourhood Plan – Consultation Statement 2 1. Regulation 14 Pre-submission Consultation 1.1. Consultation with the community and Statutory Consultees on the Draft Fiskerton cum Morton Neighbourhood Plan began on January 20th, 2019 to March 3rd, 2019. The drop-in consultation events have been held at the Arthur Radford Sport Ground Centre on the 27th January 2019 between 10:00 am and 4:00pm and the Morton Village Hall on the 18th February 6:45pm- 7:30pm. 1.2. The Fiskerton cum Morton Neighbourhood Plan, Neighbourhood Profile Report, Local Green Space Assessment and, Views and Vista Assessment were available online and in hard copies. The Consultation exercise included an online and hard copy questionnaire (available in Consultation Statement: Appendix 1), these were distributed at the Drop-in event and also additional copies of the questionnaire were left in the two villages during the Regulation 14 consultation. Questions were asked to express Support or Objection to each section of the Neighbourhood Plan and supplementary documents, and in particular to the Vision, Objectives, Policies, Community Aspirations, Neighbourhood Profile Report, Local Green Space Assessment and, Views and Vista Assessment. 1.3. All consultees were given the opportunity to leave a comment to each section of the Neighbourhood Plan and to each supplementary document. -
Flooding Survey June 1990 River Avon Catchment
Flooding Survey June 1990 River Avon Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS ? Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3- Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame @ E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec W»st. Almondsbury. National Rivers Authority Bristol BS32 4UD * ‘ Severn-Trent Re&idn i c-yi * . FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 24(5) W ater Act 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER AVON CATCHMENT AND WARWICKSHIRE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099804 FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT m ivironment Agency NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY information Centre SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD Class N o ......................... SOLIHULL W MIDLANDS B91 1QT Accession No.................... COHTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References Glossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category -
National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT
National Rivers Authority Severn Trent Region TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT 'O-'ZrR'l. o VERSION PURPOSE PREPARED BY /CHECKED BY REVIEWED BY K1051/060/0/Q19 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 089502 TRENT LICENSING POLICY REVIEW DRAFT FINAL REPORT CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION 3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE CATCHMENT 5. USES OF THE RIVER TRENT 5.1 Water Abstraction 5.1.1 The Power Generation Industry 5.1.2 Public Water Supply 5.1.3 Industry 5.1.4 Agriculture 5.2 Fisheries 5.3 Recreation and Conservation 5.4 Navigation 5.5 Effluent Disposal 5.6 Flood Defence 5.7 Other Uses 6. EXISTING STATE OF THE CATCHMENT 6.1 River Flows 6.2 Water Quality 6.3 Conclusions 7. PROPOSALS FOR WATER ABSTRACTION 8 . POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSALS 9. OPTIONS FOR LICENSING POLICY 9.1 Key Points 9.2 Licensing Strategy 9.3 Prescribed Flow Conditions 9.4 Other Considerations 9.5 Conclusions APPENDICES A. MINUTES OF MEETINGS B. ACTUAL ABSTRACTION FIGURES C. POTENTIAL CHANGES IN IRRIGATION DEMAND WITHIN THE RIVER TRENT CATCHMENT 1ST OF FIGURES igure 4.1 The Trent Catchment igure 5.1 Power Stations and in the Trent Basin igure 5.2 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Rugeley igure 5.3 - Mean-Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation — Drakelow igure 5.4 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Millington igure 5.5 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Castle Donnington igure 5.6 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Ratcliffe- on-Soar igure 5.7 Mean Monthly Abstraction and Evaporation - Staythorpe igure 5.8 Mean Monthly -
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 28Ra APRIL 1978 5015
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 28ra APRIL 1978 5015 in pursuance of section 9 (6) of the Land Drainage Act to the confluence with the River Trent, within the parish of 1976, hereby gives notice of his intention to vary the said! Ruddington, Rushcliffe Borough and! Nottingham City, Not- main river map in accordance with the proposals described tinghamshire. below. (19) New diversion channels of Twyford Brook and The effect of the proposals will be to confer on the Queniborough Brook, within the parish of Queniborough, Severn-Trent Water Authority alone the power to exercise Charnwood Borough, Leicestershire. certain land drainage and flood prevention functions (in- (20) Moat Brook, from the confluence 200 metres above cluding maintenance) in relation to the added watercourses Wood Road, Codsall to the confluence with the River Penk, and to release the Authority from such functions in relation within the parishes of Brewood, Codsall, and Wrottesley to the deleted watercourses. (Det), South Staffordshire District, Staffordshire. (21) Wyrley Brook, from Cherrington Drive to existing Additions main river at the confluence with the Golly Brook, within (1) Messingham Catchwater Drain, from the confluence the parishes of Cheslyn Hay and Great Wyrley, South with Eminsons Dyke to the confluence with the Bottesford Staffordshire District, and near Bridgtown, Cannock Chase Beck, within the parish of Messingham, Glanford Borough, District, Staffordshire. Humberside. (22) Witherley Brook, from the upstream face of the road- (2) River Derwent, from the outfall structure at Lady- bridge at Atterton Lane to the confluence with the River bower reservoir to the existing head of main river at York- Anker, within the parish of Witherley, Hinckley and Bos- shire Bridge, within the parishes of Bamford and Thomhill, worth Borough, Leicestershire. -
Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update
Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Update Final Report July 2015 47071849 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 January Draft report for client Ed Byers Jo Somerton Andrew Woodliffe 2015 comment Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant Penelope Pickerin Flood Risk Consultant 2 July Final Report Ed Byers Jo Somerton Carl Pelling 2015 Flood Risk Consultant Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Consultant URS Infrastructure and Environment Ltd Royal Court, Basil Close, Chesterfield, S41 7SL, United Kingdom. Phone: +44 (1246) 209221 Fax: +44 (1246) 209229 FINAL REPORT 47071849 July 2015 i Nottinghamshire Level 1 Minerals SFRA Limitations AECOM and URS have now joined together as one company, and will be known as AECOM moving forward. Whilst the brand is AECOM and operate as one company, contracting entities (all of which are now wholly owned by AECOM) and lines of communication currently remain the same unless specifically agreed or communicated otherwise. URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Nottinghamshire County Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (Proposal Number: 47065807, dated 21st August 2014). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. -
Flooding Survey June 1990 Lower Trent Catchment
Flooding Survey June 1990 Lower Trent Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS E n v i r o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House. Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD W1SLSH NRA C ard iff WESSEX • NRA B ristol r* Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 24(5) W ater A ct 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) LOWER TRENT CATCHMENT AND NOTTINGHAMSHIRE FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT bv'v-u’onment Agency NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION information Centre SAPPHIRE EAST Head Office 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOUHULL Class N o W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Accession No 099803 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References Glossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Oiscount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 -
Local Environment Agency Plan
local environment agency plan LOWER TRENT AND EREWASH CONSULTATION DRAFT FEBRUARY 1999 SCUNTHORPE ) GAINSBOROUGH K-ON-TRENT Key Details Area: 2045km2 Flood Defence Population: 800,000 (approx) Length of "Main" river (km) 393.3 Length of defended river (km) 240 Major settlements P opulatio n Number of urban flood alleviation schemes 13 Beeston 21,440 Monitored Water Quality Bingham 7,590 Bottesford 3,183 Length of river in GQA Grade (km) 1998 Castle Donington 6,000 C otgrave 7,520 Quality Grade Length (km) D erby * 57,165 Eastwood 11,825 Good A 24.1 Gainsborough 20,000 B 220.6 H ucknall 29,535 Fair C 368.3 Ilkeston 12,680 D. 111.1 Keyworth 7,465 Poor E 108.3 Long Eaton 5,580 Bad F 5.1 Newark-on-Trent 24,775 N ottingham 284,000 Consented discharges: Radcliffe-on-T rent 7,510 Ruddington 6,425 Private sewage treatment plants 54 S andiacre 8,390 Major Industrial discharges 10 Scunthorpe 62,400 Southw ell 6,610 Waste Management Stapleford 17,265 West Bridgford 36,185 Landfill sites 33 * Part of district lies outside of boundary Transfer Stations 38 Licensed scrap yards 37 Water Resources Civic Amenity Sites 17 Incinerators 2 Average annual rainfall 612mm Sewage Treatment Works 77 Total licensed abstraction - 8 016 Ml/d - 1 406 361 Ml/a Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) Number of surface abstractions 407 Number of groundwater abstractions 423 IPC Authorised Processes 47 Number of licensed impoundment’s 27 Radioactive substances (RAS) Conservation Sites with Authorisations for Sites of Special Scientific Interest 65 accumulation and disposal -
Flooding Survey June 1990 Upper Severn Catchment
---*--- - RA Severn-Trent 15 Flooding Survey June 1990 Upper Severn Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive. Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD r Severn-Trent Region Boundary ■ M a n • Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame National Rivers Authority Sevem-TrerT ~ FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1980 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 24(5) W ater A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) UPPER SEVERN CATCHMENT SHROPSHIRE AND POWYS Environ me n i .a .o e ocy FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT i nrorrnation .Centre NATIONAL RIVERS ALTTHORrTY Head Ovrice. SEVERN-TRENT REGION SAPPHIRE EAST lass No.. 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL xssiorvNo W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099807 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References Glossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors CHAPTER -
Notts Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final Draft for Consultation December 2015 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager Cover Photographs Top Left Cropwell Butler 2013 Top Right Surcharging of Drains in East Stoke Bottom Left Flooding; Oxton Road Southwell 2013 Bottom Right Pleasley Vale Mansfield 2013 Final Draft for Consultation December 2015 i Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Final Draft for Consultation December 2015 i Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................