DOCSLIB.ORG

Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51798-0 - Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More information Index abortion, 176 Baumrind, Diana, 57 abuse, 176 Belmont Report, 57, 67 adderall, 231 beneficence,57 , 191 Aguirre twins, 207 benevolence, 9 altruism, 9 best interests, 23–35, 39, 60, 127, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), 174, 180, 204, 206, 211, 215, 226, 30, 67, 70, 73, 87, 113, 121, 141, 151, 268–270, 272–274 156, 160, 221, 268, 269 Bijani twins, 205, 207–210 American College of Medical Genetics, birth control, 175, 184 125 brain death, 248 American College of Surgeons, 189, 198 British Medical Association, 74 American Pediatric Surgical Association, Brown v. Board of Education, 45 189 American Society of Human Genetics, Canadian Paediatric Society, 73, 142, 125 256, 270 androgen insensitivity syndrome, 149, cardiopulmonary death, 248, 255 151, 158 Cardoza, Benjamin, 48–49 anencephalic babies, 255–257 Centers for Disease Control and apnea test, 249 Prevention (CDC), 115, 222 artificial hydration,252 , 255 Child Abuse Protection and Treatment Ashley treatment, 182 Act (CAPTA), 28–36, 278–280 Ashley X, 182 child labor law, 43 assent, 11, 59–60, 190 Child Neurology Society, 253 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children as a means, 40–41 (ADHD), 231–240 clinical determination of brain death, Attard twins, 206, 210–215 250 atypical genital development, 149, 156 clitoromegaly, 157 autonomy, 173, 184, 190, 276 cloacal exstrophy, 155 coercion, 67, 177, 265 Baby Doe case, 165 cognitive enhancement, 240 Baby Doe rules, 28–36, 279 competence, 59 Baby Gabriel, 255 confirmatory tests of whole brain death, Baby K, 47 249 Bacon, Francis, 15 compassion, 9, 33, 90 285 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51798-0 - Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More information 286 Index constrained parental autonomy, 127 feminist ethics, 166, 168 contraception, 176 fertility, 149 Council for International Organizations fetus in fetu, 203 of Medical Sciences, 58 fidelity,8 –9 Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of fiduciary obligation, 11–12 the American Medical Association, of parents, 11, 17–18 125 of physicians and parents as Counseling, 265 fiduciaries,18 –20 courage, 8, 90 Food and Drug Administration (FDA), craniopagus, 203, 206, 207, 209 187, 221, 233 creative phosphokinase, 114–115 futility, 264, 271 Cruzan, 275 futility legislation, 265 Danish Council of Ethics, 250 gender, 149, 150 Davis, Dena, 40 gender identity, 150 dead-donor requirement, 248, 255–256 gender role, 150 delivery room resuscitation, 143 Genetic Information Non-discrimination dexamethasone (DEX), 159–160 Act, 135 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental gestational age estimation, 141–142 Disorders, 4th ed (DSM-IX), 231–232 goals, 6–7, 26, 118 dicephalic twins, 203, 206–207 gonadal dysgenesis, 149 doctrine of double effect, 212 gonadal status, 153 do not resuscitate (DNR), 269 gonadectomy, 154 Dworkin, Gerald, 40 Gregory, John, 12, 15–17 Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, 62 electrocerebral silence on electroencephalography, 249 Heiman, Henry, 56 emancipated minor, 64 Hensel twins, 207 Emergency Medical Treatment and herd immunity, 226 Labor Act (EMTALA), 47–48 HIV 75, 76–77 Epicure study, 142 Hobbes, Thomas, 23 equipoise, 193 Holc, Paul, 255 Ethical Guidelines for Innovative Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 47 Surgery, 195 Holten twins ethics committees, 88–90 Hooker, Worthington, 73 case consultation, 96–102 Hopkins baby, 32 chairing, 102–103 hormone replacement therapy, 154, education, 104 158–159 follow-up and evaluation, 103–104 HPV vaccine, 223 membership, 90–96 Human Genome Project, 125 pediatric, 90–96 human subject research, 186, 195 policy development, 105 Hume, David, 15, 271 European Society for Paediatric humility, 9 Endocrinology, 151 Huntington disease, 27, 126, 134 eugenics, 177 hyperkinetic disorder, 232 extremely preterm infant, 141, 143 hysterectomy, 103, 182 familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Illinois appellate court, 183 131 immunization, 219–227 Feinberg, J., 132 immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), 117 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51798-0 - Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More information Index 287 incest, 176 minimally conscious state, 257 infanticide, 170 –171 moderation, 8 informed consent, 178, 179 Money, John, 150 innovations, 188–189, 194, 196 Montalvo v. Borkovec, 30 In re Estate of C.W., 180 moral status, of children and parents, 38 In re E.G., 276 multidisciplinary team, 152–153 In re Estate of K.E.J., 183 Multi-Society Task Force on the In re Gault, 45 Persistent Vegetative State, 252 In re Terwillinger, 178, 179, 181, 183 Institute of Medicine, 113, 121, 222 National Association of Retarded institutional review boards (IRBs), Children (NARC), 113 57–69, 89, 187, 188, 191 National Commission for the Protection International Classification of Diseases, 10th of Subjects of Biochemical and ed (ICD 10), 232 Behavioral Research, 56 intersex, 149 National Society of Genetic Counselors, intolerability, 273 125 irreversible coma, 248 necessity, 191 ischiopagus, 203, 210 neglect, 176 neuro-enablement, 240 Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 225 newborn screening Jenner, Edward, 54–55 consent, 119–121 justice, 8, 32–33, 57, 69, 118, 119, 141, cystic fibrosis, 116–119 144–145, 192, 204, 206 Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 113 juvenile court system, 43 Guthrie cord, 112, 113–114, 119 identification of carriers, 116–117 Kennedy Kriegr Institue (KKI), 62–63 phenylketonuria, 111, 113–114 Klinefelter syndrome, 149 research, 119 sickle cell disease, 116–117 Lakeberg twins, 206 nonmaleficence,191 Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine nontraumatic brain injury, 252, 253 Society, 151 Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 142 legal status of children and parents, Nuremberg Code, 56 43–52 nurture-neuroethics, 208, 210, 214, 235 life-sustaining treatment, 250, 262–281 Linares, Sammy, 280 omphalopagus, 203 live donor liver graft transplantation, 193 orchiectomy, 158 Locke, John, 39–40, 43, 166–168 organ donation, 248, 251 Loma Linda University Medical Center, organ transplantation, 248 256 parasitic twin, 203 Marion’s Case, 281 parens patrial, 44, 49, 178, 179, 271, 275 marriage, 176 Parham v. JR, 39, 50 McCarther twins, 207 Paul, Diane, 114 McCormick, Richard, 56–57 paternalism, 173, 191 Mengele, Josef, 55 Pennsylvania, 178 mens rea, 214 Percival, Thomas, 12, 16–17 mental disability, 174, 176, 177, 178, 181, permanent vegetative state, 252–255 183 in children, 253, 264, 270 methylphenidate, 231 personhood, 165–166, 169 Meyer v. Nebraska, 44 Piaget, Jean, 63–64 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51798-0 - Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More information 288 Index Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 44 Scientology movement, 233 Policy for the Protection of Human self-defense, 213 Research Subjects, 57–58 sexual function, 149 Poling, Hannah, 222 sexuality, 173, 174 poor, 177 sexual orientation, 150 worthy and unworthy, 14–15 Singapore, 208 Porter, Dorothy, 123 Singer, Peter, 165–170 Porter, Roy, 123 singleton assumption, 205 President’s Commission for the Study Society of University Surgeons, 190 of Ethical Problems in Medicine Sophie’s choice, 213 and Biomedical and Behavioral state laws, 182, 184, 225 Research, 87 status epilepticus, 189 Prince v. Massachusetts, 44–45, 49 sterilization, 177–179, 181, 183 professional integrity, 16, 18–19 sudden unexpected death in epilepsy proportionality, 208, 210 (SUDEP), 75–76 pseudohermaphroditism, 149 surgical innovation, 186, 191 pyopagus, 203 sympathy, 15 quality of life, 267 tandem mass spectrometry, 111 terminal illness, 264 Ramsey, Paul, 56–57 thimerosal, 221 rape, 176 thoracopagus, 203 Re A, 211, 215 transhumanism, 240 reasonableness, 25 traumatic brain injury, 252, 253 Re C, 274 trust, 15–16, 254, 263 Red Book, 221 truth telling, 73 reproductive privacy, 174, 175 cultural context, 78–80 research and dying child, 80–82 adolescents, 63–65 tubal ligation, 178, 180, 183 historical perspectives, 54–58 Turner syndrome, 75, 77–78, 149 informing parents and children, Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 56 61–62 minimal risk, 58 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and neonates, 66 Human Rights, 87 payments for participation, 66–70 United Nations Convention on the Rights regulations on, 56–59 of the Child, 50–51, 74 responsibility of investigators and United States Supreme Court, 44, 174, IRBs, 62–63 175, 225, 275 respect, 57, 204, 255 United States Uniform Determination of rights, 132–133 Death Act, 249 Ritalin, 231 utilitarian principle, 168 Roe v. Wade, 175 Royal College of Paediatrics and Child vaccines, 223 Health, 270 value judgment, 267 R v. Dudley, 214, 215 virtue ethics, 3–5 cardinal, 7–9 sacrifice surgery, 204, 206 and medicine, 5–6, 263 Schneider, Carl, 49 in pediatrics, 7 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-51798-0 - Pediatric Bioethics Edited by Geoffrey Miller Index More information Index 289 wakefulness without awareness, Willowbrook State School, 55 252 wisdom, 7–8 ward, 65 World Health Organization, 112 Washington State law, 182 World Medical Association Declaration Washington State’s Protection and of Helsinki, 56 Advocacy System, 182 Wentworth, Arthur, 56 Zucert v. King, 225 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Frailty of Disability Rights
    ESSAY THE FRAILTY OF DISABILITY RIGHTS JASMINE E. HARRIS† INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 30 I. THE CASE OF COVID-19 & THE ROLLBACK OF DISABILITY RIGHTS ..................................................................................... 33 A. Access to COVID-19 Related Treatment ........................................... 34 B. Access to a Free Appropriate [and Remote] Public Education .............. 38 II. THE INSTABILITY OF DISABILITY RIGHTS .................................. 45 A. Morality, Medicine, and Bad Differences .......................................... 45 B. Stealth Advocacy and the Absence of Public Contestation .................... 46 C. The Difficulty of Defning Disability ................................................. 49 III. BEYOND COVID-19 ..................................................................... 52 A. Identifying the Next Waves of Disability Discrimination ..................... 53 B. Reimagining Legal & Policy Interventions ........................................ 57 1. Olmstead Enforcement ......................................................... 58 2. Cleburne and Rational Basis Review ..................................... 59 3. Disability as National Security ............................................. 61 CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 63 † Professor of Law, University of California—Davis; J.D., Yale Law School; A.B., Dartmouth College. This Essay has benefitted from thoughtful
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Research – a Journey Toward Diversity
    September Accelerated Cure Project for MS 2017 Accelerating research towards a cure for multiple sclerosis Clinical Research – A Journey Toward Diversity Clinical trials are an essential part of the drug development process. Regulatory agencies such the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) use information gathered from clinical trials to decide if medicines are safe and effective. It is important to have ethnic diversity in clinical trials to better understand diseases, and the full impact of certain drugs. Different ethnicities can have unique responses to the same disease. Studies have shown that MS can be especially active in African Americans. The effectiveness of many drugs can also vary depending on the patient’s ethnicity, lifestyle, culture and genetic makeup. For example, about 50 percent of Asian patients and 75 percent of Pacific Islanders lack the enzymes required to activate Plavix (a blood thinner). Certain classes of hypertension drugs have recently been found to be less effective in African American patients. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), minorities account for fewer than 10 percent of patients enrolled in clinical trials. African American men are twice as likely as Caucasian men to die from prostate cancer, yet they represent just 4 percent of prostate cancer clinical trial participants. Suicide is one of the top three causes of death among Asian American women under 45 years of age, yet they represent just 1 percent of major depressive disorder clinical trial participants. And while the prevalence of diabetes among Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans is more than double that of Caucasians, those groups combined represent just 4 percent of diabetes trial participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Eunice Rivers (Tuskegee Nurse)9,10 of Tuskegee Study
    Teaching Ethics through Role-Play: Comparing Public Health Research Conducted at the Willowbrook State School with the Infamous Tuskegee Study Maya C. Rose, Jessica E. Brodsky, Elizabeth S. Che, Dvora Zomberg, & Patricia J. Brooks College of Staten Island and The Graduate Center, CUNY Background Why Revisit Willowbrook and Tuskegee Group Differences in Awareness Role-play • In their introduction to research ethics, college students often learn about the in Introductory Psychology Classes? Awareness of Tuskegee Awareness of Willowbrook • Promotes discussion of research ethics infamous Tuskegee study, where physicians left syphilis untreated in Black Pre Post Pre Post men from 1932 to 1972 in order to study the progression of the disease.1 • Encourages students to confront racism and ableism in American society • The hepatitis studies that took place at the Willowbrook State School from • Allows students to draw connections to textbook coverage of Tuskegee Yes (n = 130) 31 (23.8%) 129 (99.2%) 46 (35.4%) 128 (98.5%) 1956 to 1970 are less often discussed. At Willowbrook, intellectually disabled 4 No (n = 73) 12 (16.4%) 59 (80.8%) 27 (40.0%) 59 (80.8%) children were deliberately infected with hepatitis via food laced with fecal Student Role-Play (Part 3 of Homework) material for purposes of biomedical research. Total (N = 203) 43 (21.2%) 188 (92.6%) 73 (36.0%) 187 (92.1%) Tuskegee Study Participants (Last 87 and Ernest Hendon8) • Both studies exemplify the gross violations of human rights that were once "In 1932, I was poor 24-year-old sharecropper that had some “bad blood”. I had never been to the doctor and me like The majority of students (64%) reported that they took part in the role-play.
    [Show full text]
  • B.R.I.D.G.E.S. Forecast
    B.R.I.D.G.E.S. Building Relationships Intentionally to Develop Growth and Exemplary Services {August 2021} FORECAST WELCOME! AUGUST August 18 is “Never Give Up Day”. This day is about a mindset of determination to help us get through even the hardest of challenges. It is about motivating others and inspiring ourselves. Of course, we should try to keep this mindset all year round, but this day can help us get us back in the game and refresh us to keep going. To quote Thomas Edison, “I have not failed, I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work”. To help us to never give up there are a few points to try and keep us going. 1. Adopt a “I won’t quit” mindset. 2. Remember and repeat your Why. 3. Find a different how and try a new technique or strategy. 4. Use failure as a lesson August Monthly observances: • National Black Business Month • National Back to School Month • American Adventures Month • American Artist Appreciation Month • Happiness Happens Month Please review the latest DODD health and welfare alerts at https://dodd.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/dodd/health-and-welfare There is some wonderful helpful information regarding summer safety. Here are some other summer safety tip ideas. Hydrate, Hydrate, Hydrate If you feel thirsty, you are already dehydrated Carry water with you and drink frequently, use a reusable water bottle Wear sunscreen when outside and reapply frequently Wear Sunglasses and hats Upcoming Rule Changes: July 1, 2021 Rule: 5123-10-05 (Early Intervention Program - Developmental Specialist Certification) September 1, 2021 Rules: 5123-2-08 (Provider Certification - Agency Providers) 5123-2-09 (Provider Certification - Independent Providers) https://dodd.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/dodd/forms-and-rules/rules-under- development/effective+dates+for+new+rules KUDOS The KUDOS for this month is going to be a little different.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid by Catherine N
    A Guide to the Assemblywomen Elizabeth A. Connelly Papers, 1974-2002 Archives & Special Collections College of Staten Island Library, CUNY 2800 Victory Blvd., 1L-216 Staten Island, NY 10314 © 2003 The College of Staten Island, CUNY Finding Aid by Catherine N. Carson, Mary Hedge & Jeffrey Kroessler Overview of the Collection Collection No. : PM-2 Title: Elizabeth A. Connelly Papers Creator: Elizabeth A. Connelly Dates: 1974-2002 Extent: 36 Linear Feet Abstract: Assemblywoman Elizabeth A. Connelly was elected to the New York State Assembly in 1973 as the first woman from Staten Island elected to public office. Connelly was appointed Chairwoman of the Committee on Mental Health, Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities and Alcoholism and Substance Abuse in 1977, becoming the first woman Democrat ever to chair a standing Assembly Committee. Connelly was also interested in environmental issues and her activities in closing the Fresh Kills Landfill and in protecting the Staten Island environment. Connelly was appointed to chair the Committee on Standing Committees in 1993 and was appointed Speaker Pro Tempore in 1995, the highest leadership position ever held by a woman in the New York State Assembly. Connelly retired in 2000 as the longest serving woman in the history of the New York State Legislature. The collection contains correspondence, newsletters, Finding Aid for the Assemblywoman Elizabeth A. Connelly Papers reports, press releases, news clippings, public hearing testimony, photographs and awards. Administrative Information Preferred Citation The Assemblywoman Elizabeth A. Connelly Papers, Archives & Special Collections, Department of the Library, College of Staten Island, CUNY, Staten Island, New York. Acquisition Assemblywoman Elizabeth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Timeline - Advocacy
    Disability Timeline - Advocacy 1841 Dorothea Dix begins to advocate for people with disabilities held in prisons and ACT INST Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the poorhouses. PSY USA Disability Rights Movement. WOM 1854 New England Gallaudet Association of the Deaf founded Montpelier, Vermont. ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the ORG USA Disability Rights Movement. 1878 Modified Braille demonstrated by Joel W. Smith to American Association of ACT BLI Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the Instructors of the Blind. Rejecting it, association instead continues to support New EDU ORG Disability Rights Movement. York Point, even though blind readers complain it is more difficult to read and write. USA "War of the Dots" ensues, with blind advocates mostly favoring Modified Braille, while sighted teachers and administrators, who control transcription funds, back New York Point. 1880 National Convention of Deaf Mutes in Cincinnati, Ohio. Gathering ultimately leads ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the to founding of National Association of the Deaf (NAD), which will resist oralism ORG USA Disability Rights Movement. and suppression of American Sign Language. 1901 National Fraternal Society of the Deaf founded by graduates of Michigan School ACT DF Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the for the Deaf. As only fraternal life insurance company run by Deaf people, advocates L&P ORG Disability Rights Movement. during first half of 20th century for Deaf people's rights to buy insurance and get USA driver's licenses. 1908 Clifford Beers, A Mind That Found Itself, exposes abusive conditions in public and ACT INST Pelka, ABC-Clio Companion to the private mental hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    Preface Welcome to the remarkable world of child and adolescent development. Many of you are read- ing this book because you plan to be teachers, counselors, speech therapists, recreational leaders, or medical practitioners. Some of you will be (or already are) parents. All of you are citizens who influence the lives of children through your knowledge, votes, and participation in communities. The material in this text should be of interest to everyone who is concerned about children and adolescents, from the library volunteer to the principal of a school for children facing the challenges of learning in a new language. No background in human or developmental psychology is necessary to understand this mate- rial. We have avoided jargon and technical language whenever possible and focused on writing a clear, relevant, and interesting book on an exciting topic. We also have written this book with three features ever in mind: • A chronological framework for discussing child development • A commitment to clear explanations of theory coupled always with applications to practice • A complete and thorough integration of diversity CHRONOLOGICAL FRAME As you glance at the table of contents for this book, you will notice that we examine three different areas of child development—physical, cognitive, and social emotional—during the specific time pe- riods of infancy and toddlerhood, early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence. Of course, these are not exact categories. Children develop continuously, not only across time periods, but also across areas—physical development is not separated from cognitive development, and emotional development does not proceed independently from social or physical development.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy for an Everyday Life Disclaimer
    Advocacy for an Everyday Life Presented by: KEPRO SW PA Health Care Quality Unit (KEPRO HCQU) December 2017 eh Disclaimer Information or education provided by the HCQU is not intended to replace medical advice from the individual’s personal care physician, existing facility policy, or federal, state, and local regulations/codes within the agency jurisdiction. The information provided is not all inclusive of the topic presented. Certificates for training hours will only be awarded to those attending the training in its entirety. Attendees are responsible for submitting paperwork to their respective agencies. 2 1 Objectives • Discuss the importance of promoting equal treatment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) • State ways for caregivers to practice advocacy for persons with I/DD in all interactions • Recall ways that caregivers can help an individual to make choices and enjoy an “Everyday Life” 3 What is Advocacy? The act or process of supporting a cause; pleading in favor of something (American Heritage Dictionary, 2011) 4 2 The Need for Advocacy for People with I/DD • Historical treatment of people with I/DD • Stigma associated with having a disability • Disparities between people without disabilities and those with a disability 5 Results of Advocacy • Protection of the individual’s civil and constitutional rights • Improved services to meet individual preferences and desires 6 3 Results of Advocacy – continued • Full access to and participation in community life • Recognition of people with I/DD as valued and contributing members of society 7 Tools to Promote Advocacy • Self‐Determination • Positive Approaches • Everyday Lives • Laws • People First Language • Education 8 4 Self‐Determination • Freedom • Authority • Responsibility • Support (Self‐Advocacy Association of NY State, n.d.) 9 Everyday Lives • Choice • Freedom • Control • Success • Quality • Contributing to the Community • Stability • Accountability • Safety • Mentoring • Individuality • Collaboration • Relationships (PA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Willowbrook Mile Collaboration
    The Willowbrook Mile Collaboration The Willowbrook Mile Collaboration Executive Summary The Willowbrook Mile project is a collaboration among the Staten Island Developmental Disabilities Council, the primary advocacy consortium for families and service providers for people with developmental disabilities on Staten Island; the College of Staten Island; the Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities; and the Elizabeth Connelly Resource Center/Office for People with Developmental Disabilities. Prior to the initiation of this project, the Council had developed the concept of creating a walking trail commemorating the Willowbrook State School and the College created a fitness trail with landmarks based on the Willowbrook State School. With the unification of these projects, the concept was formulated for a walking trail through the three distinct campuses that were created from the original 383 pastoral acres that were once the Willowbrook State School. The shared vision for the former Willowbrook State School property is to create a pathway for everyone to share the history of the property that would be accomplished in an inclusive, productive, progressive, and creative manner within a community partnership. The Willowbrook Mile project aims to preserve the site’s history and create a visionary presence that acknowledges the deinstitutionalization movement to empty large ineffective institutions, as well as the crucial initiation of sustained rights for people with disabilities. In the early 1970s, Willowbrook burst onto the national scene following a series of articles published by the Staten Island Advance detailing the deplorable conditions that Sen. Robert Kennedy compared to a “snake pit” following his 1965 visit to the institution. Following the Geraldo Rivera, Eyewitness News exposé, residents and their families joined civil libertarians and mental health advocates in a lawsuit against the state “to prevent further deterioration and to establish that residents had a constitutional right to treatment,” according to The New York Times.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability History Timeline
    National Consortium on Leadership and Disability for Youth Disability History Timeline DISABILITY HISTORY TIMELINE: Resource and Discussion Guide This disability history timeline is designed to help you learn about the rich history of people with disabilities. If you have a disability, this is about your history, but it may not be the history you know. Increasing your knowledge of disability history will help you inspire and lead others by telling the diverse stories of the many who have gone before. Starting Yoshiko Dart shortly after the United States was founded, the disabilities timeline features examples of the remarkable diversity, creativity, and leadership that has shaped the disability community up through today. N C L D Youth NAME: Note: Although designed for youth and emerging leaders with disabilities, the Disability History Timeline and related activities can be used to educate a broader audience. For example, the materials may be useful for training service providers on the importance of educating youth with disabilities about their history or as an orientation for program staff before working with youth with disabilities. 64551_IEL_1_24_acg.indd 1 3/16/09 1:01:09 PM 64551_IEL_1_24_acg.indd 2 3/16/09 1:01:10 PM 1770 1776 Founding Father Serves Despite Disability Stephen Hopkins, a man with cerebral palsy, is one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. Hopkins is known for saying “my hands may tremble, my heart does not.” 1780 Wikipedia 1782 Improved Amputation Techniques Edward Alanson, an English surgeon, suggests a change in the way limbs are amputated, resulting in faster healing and less infection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science and Ethics of Humans in Research
    The Science and Ethics of Humans in Research Grades 7-12 | First Edition The Science and Ethics of Humans in Research This curriculum is available on the NWABR website, http://www.nwabr.org Permission granted for educational use ©2013 Northwest Association for Biomedical Research All Rights Reserved Credits AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS EXPERT REVIEWERS Renee Agatsuma, MSEd Gail B. Broder, MHS Former Faculty, Garfield High School, Seattle, WA HIV Vaccine Trials Network Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Myra Arnone, MAT Seattle, WA Faculty, Redmond High School, Redmond, WA Kelly Edwards, PhD Dawn Brown, MEd Faculty, Department of Bioethics and Humanities Science Teacher, Truman Career Academy, University of Washington School of Medicine Federal Way, WA Seattle, WA Jeanne Ting Chowning, MS Barbara Waxman, PhD Northwest Association for Biomedical Research, Paragon Education Network Seattle, WA Seattle, WA Elise Cooksley, MS Chris Witwer, CIP Faculty, Two Rivers High School, North Bend, WA Compliance Manager Paula Fraser, MLS Institute for Systems Biology Bellevue, WA Seattle, WA Joan Griswold, MIT PROJECT MANAGEMENT, EDITING, Northwest Association for Biomedical Research, Seattle, WA AND CURRICULUM PRODUCTION Kristen Clapper Bergsman, MEd, and Kathryn True Lindsey Own Laughing Crow Curriculum LLC Faculty, The Evergreen School, Shoreline, WA Rosetta Eun Ryong Lee Faculty, Seattle Girls School, Seattle, WA Jodie Spitze Faculty, Kent-Meridian High School, Kent, WA Dianne Thompson Faculty, Kent-Meridian High School, Kent, WA COVER DESIGN Cover produced by Laughing Crow Curriculum LLC Designed by Clayton DeFrate Design GRAPHIC DESIGN Clayton DeFrate Design COPYEDITING Polly Freeman, MA PROOFING Joanna Prasertong, Laughing Crow Curriculum LLC © Northwest Association for Biomedical Research HUMANS IN RESEARCH | 1 FUNDING SOURCE CURE ADVISORY BOARD This curriculum was made possible by “Collaborations Bill Cameron, PhD to Understand Research and Ethics” (CURE), supported Associate Professor, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending-Life Decisions: Some Disability Perspectives Mary Crossley University of Pittsburgh School of Law
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 33 Article 2 Issue 4 Summer 2017 7-13-2017 Ending-Life Decisions: Some Disability Perspectives Mary Crossley University of Pittsburgh School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Recommended Citation Mary Crossley, Ending-Life Decisions: Some Disability Perspectives, 33 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 893 (2017). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol33/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Crossley: Ending-Life Decisions: Some Disability Perspectives ENDING-LIFE DECISIONS: SOME DISABILITY PERSPECTIVES Mary Crossley* INTRODUCTION My contribution to this symposium on “Quinlan at 40: Exploring the Right to Die in the U.S.” considers the challenges to end-of-life decision-making that disability poses. I am perhaps an odd choice to offer the disability perspective on this or any topic, as I am able bodied and of sound mind, at least for the moment. For the past thirty years, however, I have puzzled over how people with disabilities experience the health care system in this country and how the health care system experiences people with disabilities.1 Either I am not very good at puzzles of this sort, or it is a really tough puzzle, or perhaps both. In any event, I am still struggling with it. The topic continues to engage me, because, to my mind, understanding what it means to be disabled is an inextricable part of understanding what it means to be human.
    [Show full text]