DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Ref. Ares(2013)3009628 - 09/09/2013 WING Watching IST Innovation and Knowledge Framework Contract For Impact Analysis Contract No.30-CE-0029513/00-42 Funded by European Commission Information Society and Media Directorate General Specific Contract No 30-CE-0112232/00-65 Impact Analysis in the Domain of Broadband Technologies (BBT) Final report April 14, 2008 This report has been produced by the WING consortium with contributions from: Gianmarco Panza, Cefriel Valérie Chaillou, IDATE Didier Pouillot, IDATE Bea Mahieu Ballero, Databank Marina Suardi, Databank Franco Morganti, Databank The opinions expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE BROADBAND DOMAIN .................................................................................... 13 1.1 Methodological Framework ..............................................................................................................13 1.2 Structure of the Report........................................................................................................................14 1.3 Broadband Domain Strategic Objectives ......................................................................................15 1.3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 15 1.3.2 High Level Objectives of IST-RTD ................................................................................. 16 1.3.3 High Level Objectives of other EU Policies and Actions ........................................... 16 1.3.4 Specific Objectives of the Domain............................................................................. 17 1.3.5 Key Planned Impacts................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Broadband Domain Activities ...........................................................................................................20 1.4.1 Project portfolio ............................................................................................................ 20 1.4.2 Research sub-domains ................................................................................................ 22 1.4.3 Research characteristics ............................................................................................. 24 1.5 Composition Analysis ..........................................................................................................................26 1.5.1 Large industry players .................................................................................................. 28 1.5.2 SME participation ......................................................................................................... 29 1.6 Overview of Domain Activities against Domain Objectives........................................................30 2 SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................... 31 2.1 State of the Art at Beginning of Period (Start of FP5 - 1998).........................................................31 2.1.1 Optical networks and related network elements ..................................................... 31 2.1.2 Network integration ..................................................................................................... 34 2.1.3 Applications through seamless networks................................................................... 36 2.1.4 Safety, security and comfort of use............................................................................ 37 2.2 State of the Art Today.........................................................................................................................39 2.2.1 Optical networks .......................................................................................................... 39 2.2.2 Network integration ..................................................................................................... 41 2.2.3 Applications through seamless networks................................................................... 46 2.2.4 Safety, security and comfort of use............................................................................ 48 2.3 Likely Key Future Developments .......................................................................................................50 2.3.1 Optical networks .......................................................................................................... 50 2.3.2 Network integration ..................................................................................................... 51 2.3.3 Applications through seamless networks................................................................... 53 2.3.4 Safety, security and comfort of use............................................................................ 55 2.4 Domain Research Activities ...............................................................................................................56 2.4.1 Optical networks .......................................................................................................... 56 2.4.2 Network integration ..................................................................................................... 56 2.4.3 Applications through seamless networks................................................................... 57 2.4.4 Safety, security and comfort of use............................................................................ 58 2.5 Key Research Actors and their Involvement in IST-RTD .................................................................58 2.5.1 Telecom operators and Internet providers................................................................ 59 2.5.2 Vendors of network solutions and systems................................................................. 60 2.5.3 Scientific actors ............................................................................................................ 61 2.5.4 Standardisation bodies................................................................................................ 62 3 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT............................................................................................. 64 3.1 Definition of Broadband .....................................................................................................................64 3.2 The Economic and Social Environment at the Beginning of FP5 ................................................64 3.2.1 Birth of Broadband commercial offers....................................................................... 64 3.2.2 Regulatory actions in favour of Broadband.............................................................. 69 3.2.3 Usage of Broadband ................................................................................................... 70 3.3 The Economic and Social Environment Today...............................................................................73 3.4 Likely Key Future Developments .......................................................................................................78 3.5 Domain Research Activities and Involvement of Key Players .....................................................79 4 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL IMPACTS........................................................................................ 83 4.1 Effectiveness of the Research ...........................................................................................................85 4.1.1 Results at domain level ................................................................................................ 85 4.1.2 Results at sub-domain level......................................................................................... 87 4.2 Scientific and Technological Achievements..................................................................................88 4.2.1 Results at domain level ................................................................................................ 88 4.2.2 S&T Achievements in the sub-domains ...................................................................... 88 4.3 Research Capacity Impacts on the Participating Organisations.............................................100 4.3.1 Impacts at domain level ........................................................................................... 100 4.3.2 Impacts at sub-domain level .................................................................................... 102 4.3.3 European Added Value ............................................................................................ 103 4.3.4 Follow-on Research.................................................................................................... 104 4.4 Impacts on R&D capabilities in the broader environment ........................................................109 4.4.1 Impacts at domain level ........................................................................................... 109 4.4.2 Impacts at sub-domain level .................................................................................... 110 4.5 Matching Actual to Planned Impacts ...........................................................................................111 4.5.1 Scientific and technological breakthroughs........................................................... 111 4.5.2 Research capacity impacts.....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accelerating Adoption of Ipv6
    Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 LUDVIG AHLINDER and ANDERS ERIKSSON KTH Information and Communication Technology Degree project in Communication Systems First level, 15.0 HEC Stockholm, Sweden Accelerating Adoption of IPv6 Ludvig Ahlinder and Anders Eriksson 2011.05.17 Mentor and Examiner: Prof. Gerald Q. Maguire Jr School of Information and Communications Technology Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden Abstract It has long been known that the number of unique IPv4-addresses would be exhausted because of the rapid expansion of the Internet and because countries such as China and India are becoming more and more connected to the rest of the world. IPv6 is a new version of the Internet Protocol which is supposed to succeed the old version, IPv4, in providing more addresses and new services. The biggest challenge of information and communication technology (ICT) today is to transition from IPv4 to IPv6. The purpose of this thesis is to accelerate the adoption of IPv6 by highlighting the benefits of it compared to IPv4. Although the need for more IP-addresses is the most urgent incentive for the transition to IPv6, other factors also exist. IPv6 offers many improvements to IPv4 which are necessary for the continued expansion of Internet-based applications and services. Some argue that we do not need to transition to IPv6 as the problems with IPv4, mainly the address- shortage, can be solved in other ways. One of the methods of doing this is by extending the use of Network Address Translators (NATs), but the majority of experts and specialists believe that NATs should not be seen as a long-term solution.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT of Ipv6
    INTERNET ADDRESSING: MEASURING DEPLOYMENT OF IPv6 APRIL 2010 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD This report provides an overview of several indicators and data sets for measuring IPv6 deployment. This report was prepared by Ms. Karine Perset of the OECD‟s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) recommended, at its meeting in December 2009, forwarding the document to the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP) for declassification. The ICCP Committee agreed to make the document publicly available in March 2010. Experts from the Internet Technical Advisory Committee to the ICCP Committee (ITAC) and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) have provided comments, suggestions, and contributed significantly to the data in this report. Special thanks are to be given to Geoff Huston from APNIC and Leo Vegoda from ICANN on behalf of ITAC/the NRO, Patrick Grossetete from ArchRock, Martin Levy from Hurricane Electric, Google and the IPv6 Forum for providing data, analysis and comments for this report. This report was originally issued under the code DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)17/FINAL. Issued under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD member countries. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population.
    [Show full text]
  • Lrp-101U-Kit Lrp-101U-Kit
    LRP-101U-KIT LRP-101U-KIT Long Reach PoE over UTP Extender Kit PoE over Long UTP • Eliminates power cabling with PoE over UTP • Supports Power over Ethernet PSE (PoE Injector) • Power and Ethernet data transmission of 500m over UTP cabling • Complies with IEEE 802.3af / IEEE 802.3at Power over Ethernet PD on RJ45 port • Supports Long Reach PoE power up to 30.8 watts (depending on power source and cable distance) • Supports PoE Power up to 25 watts (depending on power source and cable distance) PLANET Long Reach PoE solution is designed to extend IP Ethernet transmission and • Auto detects remote powered device (PD) inject power simultaneously into a remote 802.3af/at PoE compliant powered device • Plug and Play; no PC required (PD) beyond the 100 meters distance limit of Ethernet. Industrial Case and Installation Convenient PoE over UTP Extender in Harsh Environment • Supports extensive LED indicators for network diagnostics The LRP-101U-KIT, a PLANET Long Reach PoE solution, is a Single-port PoE over • Metal case protection UTP Extender Kit featuring long range data and power transmission for distance up to • Compact size, DIN-rail and wall-mount design 500m (1,640ft.) over UTP cable, and another 100m over Ethernet cable to remote PoE • Supports EFT surge protection of 2kV DC for power line IP camera, PoE wireless AP or access control systems complied with 802.3af/at PoE. • Supports Ethernet ESD protection of 4kV DC The LRP-101U-KIT provides point to point application for easy plug-n-play operation • -20 to 70 degrees C operating temperature and deployment in climatically demanding environments with wide temperature range from -20 to 70 degrees C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016
    IPv6 in Mobile Networks APRICOT 2016 – February 2016 Telstra Unrestricted Introduction Sunny Yeung - Senior Technology Specialist, Telstra Wireless Network Engineering Technical Lead for Wireless IPv6 deployment Wireless Mobile IP Edge/Core Architect Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 2 Agenda 1. Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? 2. IPv6 – it’s here. Really. 3. Wireless Network Architectures 4. 464XLAT – Saviour? Or the devil in disguise? 5. Solution Testing and Results 6. Conclusion 7. Q&A Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 3 Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? Why IPv6 in Mobile Networks? • Exponential Growth in mobile data traffic and user equipment • Network readiness for Internet-of-Things • IPv4 public address depletion • IPv4 private address depletion • Offload the NAT44 architecture • VoLTE/IMS Remember – IPv6 should be invisible to the end-user Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 5 IPv6 It’s Here. Really. IPv6 Global Traffic The world according to Google Source - https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 7 Carrier Examples SP1 SP2 / SP3 SP4 Dual-Stack SS+NAT64+DNS64+CLAT SS/DS+NAT64+DNS-HD +CLAT 1. Every carrier will have a unique set of circumstances that dictates which transition method they will use. There is no standard way of doing this. 2. You must determine which is the best method for your network. In any method, remember to ensure you have a long-term strategy for the eventual deployment of native Single Stack IPv6! Telstra Unrestricted | IPv6 in Mobile Networks | Sunny Yeung | 02/2016 | 8 IPv4 reality – from a business perspective 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Mobile Networks and Ipv6
    Evolution of Mobile Networks and IPv6 Miwa Fujii <[email protected]> APNIC, Senior Advisor Internet Development 25th April 2014 APEC TEL49 Yangzhou, China Issue Date: [25/04/2014] Revision: [3] Overview • Growth path of the Internet – Asia Pacific region • Evolution of mobile networks • IPv6 deployment in mobile networks: Case study • IPv6 deployment status update • IPv6 in mobile networks: way forward 2 Growth path of the Internet The next wave of Internet growth • The Internet has experienced phenomenal growth in the last 20 years – 16 million users in 1995 and 2.8 billion users in 2013 • And the Internet is still growing: Research indicates that by 2017, there will be about 3.6 billion Internet users – Over 40% of the world’s projected population (7.6 billion) • The next wave of Internet growth will have a much larger impact on the fundamental nature of the Internet – It is coming from mobile networks http://www.allaboutmarketresearch.com/internet.htm 4 Internet development in AP region: Internet users 100.00 Internet Users (per 100 inhabitants) New Zealand, 89.51 90.00 Canada, 86.77 Korea, 84.10 Australia, 82.35 80.00 United States, 81.03 Japan, 79.05 Chinese Taipei, 75.99 Singapore, 74.18 70.00 Hong Kong, China, 72.80 Malaysia, 65.80 Chile, 61.42 60.00 Brunei Darussalam, 60.27 Russia, 53.27 50.00 China, 42.30 Viet Nam, 39.49 40.00 Mexico, 38.42 Peru, 38.20 The Philippines, 36.24 30.00 Thailand, 26.50 20.00 Indonesia, 15.36 10.00 Papua New Guinea, 2.30 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 http://statistics.apec.org/ 5 Internet
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of Ipv4 Address Exhaustion
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN FAKULTÄT FÜR ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIK LEHRSTUHL FÜR INTELLIGENTE NETZE UND MANAGEMENT VERTEILTER SYSTEME Empirical Analysis of the Effects and the Mitigation of IPv4 Address Exhaustion vorgelegt von M.Sc. Philipp Richter geboren in Berlin von der Fakultät IV – Elektrotechnik und Informatik der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOKTOR DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN -DR. RER. NAT.- genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Möller, Technische Universität Berlin Gutachterin: Prof. Anja Feldmann, Ph.D., Technische Universität Berlin Gutachter: Prof. Vern Paxson, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley Gutachter: Prof. Steve Uhlig, Ph.D., Queen Mary University of London Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 2. August 2017 Berlin 2017 Abstract IP addresses are essential resources for communication over the Internet. In IP version 4, an address is represented by 32 bits in the IPv4 header; hence there is a finite pool of roughly 4B addresses available. The Internet now faces a fundamental resource scarcity problem: The exhaustion of the available IPv4 address space. In 2011, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) depleted its pool of available IPv4 addresses. IPv4 scarcity is now reality. In the subsequent years, IPv4 address scarcity has started to put substantial economic pressure on the networks that form the Internet. The pools of available IPv4 addresses are mostly depleted and today network operators have to find new ways to satisfy their ongoing demand for IPv4 addresses. Mitigating IPv4 scarcity is not optional, but mandatory: Networks facing address shortage have to take action in order to be able to accommodate additional subscribers and customers. Thus, if not confronted, IPv4 scarcity has the potential to hinder further growth of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Soluzioni LRE (Long Reach Ethernet)
    Data Sheet Soluzione Cisco Systems Long Reach Ethernet La soluzione di networking Cisco Inoltre, Cisco LRE supporta modalità Systems Long Reach Ethernet (LRE) compatibili con ADSL (Asymmetric offre un accesso a banda larga, redditi- Digital Subscriber Line) e consente ai zio e ad alte prestazioni, ad edifici di service provider di portare la soluzione tipologia diversificata (alberghi, residen- LRE negli edifici in cui sono già disponi- ce [MDU, multidwelling unit], centri bili i servizi a banda larga. direzionali [MTU, multitenant unit]) e ad ambienti di campus enterprise La soluzione Cisco LRE comprende gli come le strutture produttive, formative switch Cisco Catalyst® 2900 LRE XL, e sanitarie. i dispositivi Cisco 575 LRE e Cisco 585 La tecnologia Cisco LRE estende marca- LRE CPE (Customer Premise tamente Ethernet, sui cablaggi esistenti Equipment) ed il Cisco POTS Splitter di Categoria 1/2/3, con velocità da 5 a LRE 48. 15 Mbps (full duplex), fino a distanze di La soluzione Cisco Long Reach Ethernet 1,5 chilometri (le velocità di trasmissio- offre tutto quanto è necessario per una ne dei dati effettivamente raggiungibili rapida implementazione di una rete basa- dipendono dalla qualità del cavo, dalle ta su Ethernet con prestazioni adatte per interferenze e dall’ambiente telefonico la fornitura di un accesso a Internet ad parallelo). La tecnologia Cisco LRE alta velocità a distanze ancora maggiori offre il servizio a banda larga sulle linee e di servizi come la telefonia IP e lo utilizzate dal POTS (Plain Old streaming audio/video. Telephone Service), dalla telefonia digi- La tecnologia permette a numerosi clienti tale e dal traffico ISDN.
    [Show full text]
  • IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on Ipv6 'Understanding the Commercial And
    Fall 08 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Editor Wim Degezelle January 2017 IGF 2016 Best Practice Forum on IPv6 ‘Understanding the commercial and economic incentives behind a successful IPv6 deployment’ Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of Terms ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction & Background ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. About the IGF & BPFs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Scope and Goal of the 2016 BPF ................................................................................................................. 7 2. Why deploy IPv6? ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. The Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Why Adopt IPv6?
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6 Deployment – Ipv4 Lifetime Exhaustion Sooner Than Expected?
    IPv6 Deployment – IPv4 lifetime Exhaustion sooner than expected? Tony Hain Cisco Systems - Technical Leader IPv6 Forum Fellow [email protected] Session Number Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Distribution of IPv4 addresses by /8 Central 93 ARIN 23 RIPE NCC 19 APNIC 16 LACNIC 4 AfriNIC 1 Defined 4 Multicast 16 Experimental 16 IANA - Pool 25% remaining 64 0 102030405060708090100 IANA allocated 22 /8’s between Jan. 1, 2004 and Jul. 1, 2005 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 222 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 7 6 5 IANA Allocations to RIR's 4 Raw /8 allocations per month 3 2 1 Presentation_ID 0 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 333 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA IANA Allocations to RIR's Sliding-window 6 month geo-mean scale normalized to current 1 per month 2.50000 2.00000 1.50000 1.00000 0.50000 0.00000 Sep-95 Sep-96 Sep-97 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-00 Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Presentation_ID © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 444 Allocation of IPv4 /8 blocks per month by IANA 2.75 3 2.5 2.25 IANA Allocations to RIR's 1.75 2 Sliding-window 12 month average 1.5 1.25 0.75 1 0.5 0.25 0 Presentation_ID Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 © 2003 Cisco Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipv6-Only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks Ipv4 As-A-Service
    IPv6-only Deployment in Broadband and Cellular Networks IPv4 as-a-Service LACNIC31 May, 2019 Punta Cana, DO @JordiPalet ([email protected]) - 1 Transition / Co-Existence Techniques • IPv6 has been designed for easing the transition and coexistence with IPv4 • Several strategies have been designed and implemented for coexisting with IPv4 hosts, grouped in three categories: – Dual stack: Simultaneous support for both IPv4 and IPv6 stacks – Tunnels: IPv6 packets encapsulated in IPv4 ones • This has been the commonest choice • Today expect IPv4 packets in IPv6 ones! – Translation: Communication of IPv4-only and IPv6- only. Initially discouraged and only “last resort” (imperfect). Today no other choice! • Expect to use them in combination! - 2 Dual-Stack Approach • When adding IPv6 to a system, do not delete IPv4 – This multi-protocol approach is familiar and well-understood (e.g., for AppleTalk, IPX, etc.) – In the majority of the cases, IPv6 is be bundled with all the OS release, not an extra-cost add-on • Applications (or libraries) choose IP version to use – when initiating, based on DNS response: • if (dest has AAAA record) use IPv6, else use IPv4 – when responding, based on version of initiating packet • This allows indefinite co-existence of IPv4 and IPv6, and gradual app-by-app upgrades to IPv6 usage • A6 record is experimental - 3 Dual-Stack Approach IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 Application Application Application Application TCP/UDP TCP/UDP TCP/UDP IPv6 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 IPv6-only stack Dual-stack (IPv4 & IPv6) IPv4-only stack IPv6
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of Ipv6
    Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks NIST Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 December 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Dr. Patrick D. Gallagher, Director GUIDELINES FOR THE SECURE DEPLOYMENT OF IPV6 Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-119 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-119, 188 pages (Dec. 2010) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Ipv4 Markets on Ipv6 Deployment
    Andrew Dul [email protected] The money underlies much of what we do When we push against the economics we are pushing up hill…which is hard Since “the beginning of the Internet” allocations have been based on need Over time this process was formalized into RFCs and later into RIR policies The RIRs saw the need to for allowing transfers of IPv4 addresses after exhaustion Transfer policies were created to allow economics to effect transfers Pros ◦ Allows economic factors to bring IPv4 addresses to the right place in the market place ◦ Increases the economic cost of IPv4 potentially forcing users to consider IPv6 Cons ◦ Potentially delays (or maybe deters) the adoption of IPv6 ◦ Deaggregation creates more routing table entries from larger blocks being “chopped up” to sell or lease Large known transaction from Nortel Bankruptcy to Microsoft in 2011 ◦ 667k IPv4 addresses for $7.5 million USD $11.25 USD per IPv4 address Other small transactions have occurred Address brokers are forming ◦ http://tradeipv4.com/ ◦ http://ipv4ex.com/ ◦ ARIN has a listing service 300,000 RIR Allocations to organizations Thousands 250,000 200,000 LACNIC RIPENCC 150,000 ARIN APNIC 100,000 AfriNIC 50,000 /32 IPv4AddressRIR Assignments and Allocations 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Current demand exceeds 250 million addresses per year $70,000 Billions $60,000 IPv4 Allocations vs. World GDP y = 180693x + 2E+13 $50,000 R² = 0.925 $40,000 y = 0.0007x2 - 6289x + 3E+13 $30,000 R² = 0.9432 $20,000 WorldGDP(CurrentUSD)
    [Show full text]