US-77 and K-18 Function As a City-Type Arterial Roadway with Numerous Areas Between Adjacent Developments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PREPARED FOR: US 77/K-18 CORRIDOR US 77/K-18 Partnership: Junction City MANAGEMENT PLAN Milford Geary County Kansas Department of Transportation PREPARED BY: IN ASSOCIATION WITH: Development Strategies, Inc., Stinson Morrison Hecker, LLC, ETC Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Preparation of this Plan required the input and efforts of many team members from the US 77/K-18 Partnership as well as community officials and the public. This report acknowledges and expresses our appreciation for everyone’s efforts. US 77/K-18 TechnicaL COMMITTEE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HNTB Corporation Mike Guinn - Junction City David Greiser Brian Comer Christina Cook - Junction City Kristina Pyle Greg Weatherd Tom Neal - Junction City Don Drickey Sean Gellhaus Dennis Cox - Geary County Dale Hershberger Betty Burry Harvey Brink - Milford Michael Moriarty Lindsey Bergman David Gurss Sean Thompson Randy West DEVELOPMENT Strategies Robert Lewis Andy Pfister Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP Steve Chinn ETC Institute Karen Falk i TA BLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.....................................................................................1 TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................25 Plan Purpose ..........................................................................................................................................1 Corridor Preservation Plan .......................................................................................................................................25 Study Goals ........................................................................................................................................1 Corridor-Wide Access Management Tools ................................................................................................25 Study Corridors ............................................................................................................................................1 Local Access Guidelines .............................................................................................................................26 Corridor Characteristics ............................................................................................................................1 Corridor Preservation Tools ......................................................................................................................26 Public Workshops .......................................................................................................................................2 Local Street Network improvements .....................................................................................................27 Public Survey Summary .............................................................................................................2 Mainline and Intersection Recommendations .....................................................................................27 Technical Analysis ......................................................................................................................................4 Segment 1: US 77 (Lyons Creek Road to I-70) .....................................................................27 Alternatives and Final Recommendation ..........................................................................................4 Segment 2: US 77 (I-70 to Old Highway 77/Old Milford Road) .......................................28 Segment 3: US 77 (Old Highway 77 to 12th Street Milford) ............................................29 MARKET ANALYSIS....................................................................................................6 K-18 Mainline and Intersection Recommendations............................................................................29 Recent Trends and Key Facts .........................................................................................................................6 Assumptions ........................................................................................................................................7 IMPLEMENTATION......................................................................................32 Retail Market ...............................................................................................................................................8 US 77/K-18 Partnership Committee ........................................................................................................32 Future Retail Gap ........................................................................................................................12 Tool Box of Implementation Strategies ...............................................................................................32 Office Market ..............................................................................................................................................13 I. Corridor Preservation Strategies ..........................................................................................33 Industrial Market........................................................................................................................................14 II. Access Management Strategies ..........................................................................................38 Demand for Schools ..................................................................................................................................14 III. Financing Strategies ..............................................................................................................40 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................15 EXhibits LAND USE PLAN...............................................................................................................17 Exhibit 1 - Study Corridors Map ........................................................................................................5 Plan Use .........................................................................................................................17 Exhibit 2 - US 77 and K18 Land Use Map ...........................................................................................20 Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan ...............................................................................17 Exhibit 3 - Accident Summary Map ......................................................................................................23 Access Guidelines .....................................................................................................................................17 Plan Review .................................................................................................................................................17 APPENDIX A: PLAN PLate Maps Land Use Categories ................................................................................................................................17 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC SURVey resuLts Traffic ANALysis..........................................................................................................21 Introduction .......................................................................................................................21 National, Regional and Local Context .............................................................................................21 Transportation Land Use Cycle ............................................................................................................21 Mobility verses Accessibility .................................................................................................................21 Traffic Analysis .........................................................................................................................................22 Intersection Improvements ...................................................................................................................22 ii INTRODUCTINTRODUCTI ON A NDI ONAPPRO A CH PLAN Purpose CORRIDOR Characteristics The purpose of the US 77/K-18 Corridor Management Plan (“Plan”) is to outline a long-term The Study Corridor is approximately 22 miles in length (16.5 miles along US 77 and 5.3 miles along comprehensive land use, transportation, and access management strategy for US 77 and K-18. K-18). Throughout these corridors, the physical characteristics of each roadway changes, as well as The primary issues driving the need for the Plan include: the surrounding natural and built environment. As shown in Exhibit 1, portions of the Study Corridor • Development pressures associated with future population and employment resulting from Fort are more suburban (areas through and adjacent to Junction City), while other areas are more rural Riley growth. (areas north and south of Junction City along US 77 and west of the Middle School along K-18). North of Junction City, along US 77, Milford Lake and the surrounding US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) • Impacts of the Junction City Middle School located on K-18. property border much of the Study Corridor to the west, while Fort Riley property covers much of the • Increasing congestion along US 77 through Junction City. area to the east. Along with the presence of Milford Lake and Fort Riley, significant topography north • Safety concerns at a number of key intersections. of Junction City has limited development.