DOCSLIB.ORG

Flint Hills / Fort Riley JLUS Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flint Hills / Fort Riley JLUS Overview AUGUST 2017 PREPARED FOR: P.O. Box 514 Ogden, KS 66517 www.flinthillsregion.org PREPARED BY: 1441 Maclay Commerce Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32312 www.stantec.com 800 Willamette Street, Suite. 790, Eugene, Oregon 97401 www.urbancollaborative.com This study was prepared under contract with the Flint Hills Regional Council, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment or the Flint Hills Regional Council. AUGUST 2017 Flint Hills / Fort Riley Joint Land Use Study Update Acknowledgements The Joint Land Use Study was completed with the involvement of a number of individuals and agencies in the community. Special thanks should be paid to the Flint Hills Regional Planning Council, which administrated the study, particularly Gary Stith. Two steering committees guided the JLUS process and developed the final report – the Policy Committee and Technical Working Group. The committees are made up of the following members: POLICY COMMITTEE Representative Organization Ben Bennet Geary County Commission Tony Davis Wakefield City Council Mike Dodson City of Manhattan City Commission Honey Grant Grandview Plaza Vice-Mayor Jonny Groves Wakefield City Council Tim Livsey Fort Riley Deputy Garrison Commander Mick McAllister City of Junction City Mayor Dee McKee Pottawatomie County Commission Darci Pottroff City of Riley City Council Eladio Reid City of Ogden City Council Brandy Riggs Wakefield City Council Marvin Rodriguez Riley County Commission Brad Roether City of Milford Mayor Jim Sands City of Junction City Commission Tim Sharp City of Riley Mayor David Thurlow Clay County Commission Perry Wiggins Governor’s Military Council Executive Director TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP Representative Organization Herbert Abel Fort Riley John Adam City of Manhattan Pottawatomie County Economic Development Jack Allston Corporation Trent Armbust Manhattan Area Chamber Acknowledgements Page i Flint Hills / Fort Riley Joint Land Use Study Update Representative Organization Dennis Beson Junction City Area Chamber of Commerce Chad Bunger City of Manhattan Lyle Butler City of Manhattan Eric Cattell City of Manhattan Peter Clark Pottawatomie County Brad Claussen City of Manhattan Steve Crusinberry Fort Riley Karen Davis City of Manhattan Allen Dinkel Junction City Bob Everdeen Fort Riley Mickey Fornard-Dean Junction City Chamber Doris Fritz City of Riley Vernon Hay Morris County Tim Himelick City of Milford Lori Huber Clay County Bob Isaac Riley County Troy Livingston Geary County Jeff Mataruso Fort Riley Troy Mattingly Fort Riley Stephen Metzger Pottawatomie County Clay Nauman Fort Riley John Pagen Manhattan Area Chamber Kelley Paskow Fort Riley William Raymann Fort Riley Angela Schnee City of Ogden Heather Stewart Fort Riley Benjamin VanBecelaere Fort Riley BJ Watson Fort Riley Gregg Webster Pottawatomie County Monty Wedel Riley County Jeff Williamson Fort Riley Dave Yearout Junction City Geary County Acknowledgements Page ii Flint Hills / Fort Riley Joint Land Use Study Update TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Overview and Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 JLUS Overview ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Flint Hills / Fort Riley JLUS Overview............................................................................................. 2 2 Public Involvement................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Committee Collaboration.............................................................................................................. 5 2.2 General Public Outreach ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Stakeholder Outreach ................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Public Information Tools ............................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Survey Results ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.6 InReach Plan ................................................................................................................................ 14 3 Community Profile .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Community Overview ................................................................................................................. 16 3.2 Environmental Features .............................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Growth and Development .......................................................................................................... 30 3.4 Community Features ................................................................................................................... 35 4 Military Profile .................................................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Regional Influence ....................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Fort Riley ..................................................................................................................................... 42 5 Compatibility Tools ............................................................................................................................. 51 5.1 Federal Programs and Plans ........................................................................................................ 51 5.2 State and Regional Programs and Plans ..................................................................................... 54 5.3 Local Programs and Plans ........................................................................................................... 62 6 Compatibility and Encroachment Analysis ......................................................................................... 76 6.1 Implementation Committee ....................................................................................................... 79 6.2 Land Use ...................................................................................................................................... 80 6.3 Growth Area ................................................................................................................................ 83 Table of Contents Page iii Flint Hills / Fort Riley Joint Land Use Study Update 6.4 Safety Zones ................................................................................................................................ 85 6.5 Vertical Obstructions .................................................................................................................. 88 6.6 Unmanned Air Systems ............................................................................................................... 93 6.7 Frequency Interference .............................................................................................................. 96 6.8 Noise ........................................................................................................................................... 98 6.9 Regional GIS Database .............................................................................................................. 110 6.10 Air Space ................................................................................................................................... 111 6.11 Habitat ...................................................................................................................................... 114 6.12 Prescribed Burning .................................................................................................................... 120 6.13 Alternative Energy Sources (Solar)............................................................................................ 123 6.14 Alternative Energy Sources (Wind) ........................................................................................... 125 6.15 Formalized Communication ...................................................................................................... 128 6.16 Post Access ................................................................................................................................ 130 6.17 Floodplain Management ........................................................................................................... 132 6.18 Water Resources ....................................................................................................................... 134 6.19 Housing ..................................................................................................................................... 136 6.20 Fenceline / Boundary Protection .............................................................................................. 138 6.21 Light and Glare .......................................................................................................................... 139 7 Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 2015
    RUN FOR THE WALL Quarterly Newsletter “We Ride For Those Who Can’t” October 2015 NOTE: Run For The Wall and RFTW are trademarks of Run For The Wall, Inc. The use of Run For The Wall and RFTW is strictly prohibited without the expressed written permission of the Board of Directors of Run For The Wall, Inc. In This Issue: The Editor’s Notes Post-9/11 GI Bill President’s Message New Agent Orange Study 2016 Central Route Coordinator Full Honors for MOH Veteran After 94 Years 2016 Combat Hero Bike Build Angel Fire Reunion Grand Lake Fundraiser for RFTW Kerrville Reunion The Army’s Spectacular Hidden Treasure Pending Legislation Room Bringing Them Home The Story of the Vietnam Wall Sick Call Life in the Navy Taps Mind-Body Treatment for PTSD Closing Thoughts Camp Lejeune Study Released ________________________________________________________________________________________ THE EDITOR’S NOTES About a year ago I talked about the new Veterans Court that had been started up in Lake Havasu City. Veterans Courts were at that time very new, and few people were even aware that such a thing existed. Our Veterans Court has been running for almost two years now, and I am well-entrenched in the Veterans Resource Team that helps find resources for veterans going through Veterans Court system. Representatives from all of our local veterans organizations are on the team, as well as several dozen service agencies, including our local Interagency, the VA, the Vet Center, the Veterans Resource Center, and many more agencies that are instrumental in providing the help that veterans need so that they can once again become good members of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911
    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press 2013 – Fort Riley, Kansas (Bonnie Lynn-Sherow, Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal Editor) Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911 James E. Sherow Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sfh This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Sherow, James E. (2013). "Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911," Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal. https://newprairiepress.org/sfh/2013/folioII/5 To order hard copies of the Field Journals, go to shop.symphonyintheflinthills.org. The Field Journals are made possible in part with funding from the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911 The lure of the Army’s newest post for Indian peoples was irresistible as the following three stories illustrate. In the first instance, a party of well-armed Indians spied a rural farmstead located not far from Fort Riley, and they advanced toward BUFFALO HUNT, CHASE George Catlin the cabin alarming the occupants. Linda Hall Library, Kansas City, Missouri On another day a larger party made its breaks formulaic depictions. way to the fort itself. They rode with an Consider the way in which the three air of confidence, armed and painted previous episodes concluded.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Infantry Division Post Template
    1A HOME OF THE BIG RED ONE THE 1ST INFANTRY DIVISION POST 1DivPost.com FRIDAY, MAY 1, 2015 Vol. 7, No. 18 FORT RILEY, KAN. Discussion Training Staff Sgt. Jerry Griffis | 1ST INF. DIV. Soldiers of 1st Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade change their unit patches to the “Big Red One” patch April 22 at Cav- alry Parade Field on Fort Riley, Kansas. The changing of the patches was part of an inactivation/activation ceremony and the 1st Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade also uncased new colors for the ceremony. ‘Durable’ Soldiers join Corey Schaadt | 1ST INF. DIV. Gen. David G. Perkins, commander of the United States Army Training and Doctrine Command, leads a training discussion with platoon leaders and platoon sergeants April 20 at Fort Riley. The subject of the lecture was the development of the Army division in wearing Operating Concept. General explains Army Operating ‘Big Red One’ patch By J. Parker Roberts the McCormick Foundation, whose 1ST INF. DIV. PUBLIC AFFAIRS role in part is to sustain the legacy of Concept to ‘Big Red One’ leaders the Big Red One “and that patch you It was a sound like no other as hun- just put on your shoulders,” Wesley dreds of “Durable” Soldiers removed told the Durable Soldiers in forma- By J. Parker Roberts their left arm patches in unison, re- tion on the field. 1ST INF. DIV. PUBLIC AFFAIRS placing them with the “Big Red One” The 1st Sust. Bde. was originally patch worn by their fellow Soldiers formed as Division Trains in 1917 On post to tour Fort Riley across the 1st Infantry Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Early History of Junction City, Kansas : the First Generation
    AN EARLY HISTORY OF JUNCTION CITY, KANSAS! THE FIRST GENERATION JOHN B. JEFFRIES B. A., Oklahoma State University, 1950 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History, Political Science and Philosophy KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1963 i-V iu,i 7i j[,j TABLE OF CONTENTS C 2- Chapter Page Table of Contents ii Introduction _-----_----_-__-____ i I. Garden of Eden — — 7 II. The Founding of Junction City _ _ _ _ _ 20 III. Transportation — --- — . _ 39 IV. Communications ------------------- 77 Mail Service 77 Newspapers -------------------- 81 Telegraph __________ — — __ — _ 89 V. Government ---------------______ 90 County ---------------_______ 90 Census ---------------------- 97 U. S. Land Office 100 Politics 102 City 104 Streets and sidewalks -- _______ 107 Licensing of Saloons --------------- 108 Stray Livestock - _____ ___ _. 109 Law and Order _---------_------_ no Fire Protection 117 Finances ___ __ _ 121 City Additions _ 123 Home Guard and Militia --_ 123 U. S. Military Forces 125 ili VI. Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture - _-_ - 129 Commerce ---------------------- 130 Industry ------- — — ----- 142 Agriculture ____ — — 151 VII. Cultural and Social Growth 166 Religious Organizations --------------- 166 Episcopal Church 167 Union Church ------------------- 166 Methodist Church 169 Baptist Church 170 Presbyterian Church ---------------- 170 Catholic Church 172 Cemetery -------- — _________ — _ 172 Fraternal Organizations _-_-------_-_-- 173 Social Organizations — - — -- — -- — 176 Cultural Organizations -___ ig_ Education ---------------------- 182 Conclusion -----------------_____ 192 Bibliography - — 199 Appendix A, Firms advertising in 1860 - -- 211 Appendix B, Firms Advertising in 1870 213 Appendix C, Firms Advertising in 1880 215 INTRODUCTION The history of Junction City, Kansas, is more than merely that of an Army town, although the Junction City-Fort Riley connection has existed from the days of the first settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Riley Parent Handbook
    2020 Fort Riley Parent Handbook CONTACT INFORMATION Parent Central Services Warren CDC (closed for renovation) (Registration for all programs) Bldg. 6950 Building 6620 Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm Mon-Fri: 8:00 am – 5:00 pm 785-239-9929 785-239-9885 https://webtrac.mwr.army.mil Warren East CDC Facebook: Bldg. 6981 www.facebook.com/RileyCYS Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm 785-240-0822/0823 CYS Nurse Bldg. 6620 Whitside CDC Mon-Fri: 7:30 am – 4:30 pm Bldg. 676 785-239-9632/240-3700 Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm 785-239-4978 School Liaison Officer Bldg. 6620 Whitside North CDC (Hourly Program) Mon-Fri: 7:30 am – 4:30 pm Bldg. 678 785-240-3261 Mon-Fri: 8:00 am – 4:00 pm 785-240-6739 Instructional Programs (formerly SKIES) Bldg. 6620 Custer Hill SAC Mon-Fri: 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Bldg. 5810 785-240-2822 Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm 785-239-9220 Family Child Care Bldg. 6620 Forsyth East SAC Mon-Fri: 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Bldg. 2420 785-239-9892 Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm 785-240-5820/5822 Youth Sports & Fitness Bldg. 6620 Custer Hill Youth Center Mon- Fri: 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Bldg. 5800 785-239-9223/9200 Mon-Thu: 5:45 am – 8:00 pm Fri: 5:45 am – 10:00 pm First Division CDC Sat: 2:00 – 9:00 pm Bldg. 4012 785-239-9222 Mon-Fri: 5:45 am – 6:00 pm 785-239-9011 Forsyth CDC Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Print Version (PDF)
    K2 Team Tank: Objective Camel Armor in Support of Special Operations by Robert W. Jones, Jr. A������� Army Special North).2 A�er taking three days to arrive, Operations Forces (ARSOF) are not usu- however, the armor force was not able ally associated with armored units, they to effectively leave the airfield perimeter have been known to work together when to provide an immediate impact on the the situation has warranted heavy sup- combat situation in northern Iraq. In fact, port. During World War II, the legendary three days a�er TF 1-63’s arrival, the major Colonel William O. Darby formed the Iraqi elements in the north surrendered, Captain Celeen’s provisional “Cannon Company” of four and Kurdish Peshmerga and Task Force M1A1 Abrams tank M-3 half-tracks mounted with 75mm guns Viking (10th Special Forces Group) seized accidentally drove to give additional firepower to the Rang- Kirkuk and Mosul. TF 1-63 only entered into a large hole as it ers during the Italian campaign.1 However, operations in the north as an occupying traveled at high speed not until Operation IRAQI FREEDOM force in the cities controlled by TF Viking.3 with no illumination (OIF) did ARSOF again work with armor With such a tenuous association in the during the assault on Objective Camel. forces to any appreciable degree, and north, it again fell to the Rangers to prove Because the tank even then, the association was weak. the worth of armor in special operations. entered the deep well Early in operations, armored Task Force In a situation reminiscent of that faced from the wrong end, (TF) 1-63 was airli�ed into Bashur Airfield by Darby and the Rangers in World War it flipped over and in support of Combined Joint Special II, the 75th Ranger Regiment found itself landed with its turret Operations Task Force-North (CJSOTF- in need of armor support in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S., World War I, and Spreading Influenza in 1918
    Online Office Hours We’ll get started at 2 ET Library of Congress Online Office Hours Welcome. We’re glad you’re here! Use the chat box to introduce yourselves. Let us know: Your first name Where you’re joining us from Why you’re here THE U.S., WORLD WAR I, AND SPREADING INFLUENZA IN 1918 Ryan Reft, historian of modern America in the Manuscript Division at the Library of Congress Using LoC collections to research influenza pandemic 1918-1919 Woodrow Wilson, draft Fourteen Three main takeaways Points, 1918 • Demonstrate the way World War I facilitated the spread of the virus through mobilization • How the pandemic was fought domestically and its effects • Influenza’s possible impact on world events via Woodrow Wilson and the Treaty of Versailles U.S. in January 1918 Mobilization Military Map of the [USA], 1917 • Creating a military • Selective Service Act passed in May 1917 • First truly conscripted military in U.S. history • Creates military of four million; two million go overseas • Military camps set up across nation • Home front oriented to wartime production of goods • January 1918 Woodrow Wilson outlines his 14 points Straight Outta Kansas Camp Funston Camp Funston, Fort Riley, 1918 • First reported case of influenza in Haskell County, KS, February 1918 • Camp Funston (Fort Riley), second largest cantonment • 56,000 troops • Virus erupts there in March • Cold conditions, overcrowded tents, poorly heated, inadequate clothing The first of three waves • First wave, February – May, 1918 • Even if there was war … • “high morbidity, but low mortality” – Anthony Fauci, 2018 the war was removed • Americans carry over to Europe where it changes from us you know … on • Second wave, August – December the other side … This • Most lethal, high mortality esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial De Caballería Número 79. Junio 2015
    MemorialdeCaballería Núm. 79 • Junio 2015 • 2.ª Época MEMORIAL DE CABALLERÍA MemorialdeCaballería Núm. 79 - 2.ª Época Junio 2015 DIRECTOR Coronel director de la ACAB DON JOSÉ MARÍA CASTAÑO FERNÁNDEZ SUBDIRECTOR Teniente Coronel jefe interino Núm. 79 • Junio 2015 • 2.ª Época de la Secretaría Institucional del Arma DON JOSÉ RAMON NÚÑEZ YÁÑEZ NIPO: 083-15-204-3 (Edición en línea) NIPO: 083-15-203-8 (Impresión bajo demanda) ISSN: 2444-5045 (Edición en línea) CONSEJO DE REDACCIÓN Vocales: Por la ACAB: TCol. D. José Luis Ruiz Silverio Cte. D. Andrés González Fresnillo SbMy. D. Manuel Rodríguez Pérez Por la BRC II: Cte. D. José Antonio Calvo Hernández Secretario de Redacción: STte. D. José Alfonso Luis Figueruelo Edición gráfica y maquetación: Centro Geográfico del Ejército Los números editados se pueden consultar en formato electrónico en: http://publicaciones.defensa.gob.es/inicio/revistas App Revistas Defensa: disponible en tienda Google Play http://play.google.com/store para dispositivos Android y en App Store para iPhones y iPads, http://store.apple.com/es PUBLICIDAD: EDITORIAL MIC C/ Artesiano, s/n (Pol. Ind. Trobajo del Camino) 24010 - LEÓN Tel.: 902 271 902 / Fax: 902 371 902 direcció[email protected] / [email protected] Sumario SUMARIO Editorial ....................................................................... 5 ACTIVIDADES DE LAS UNIDADES DEL ARMA • El Regimiento Alcántara inaugura su nueva sala histórica ................................ 6 • VI carrera cívico-militar Lusitania 8................................................. 7 • Colaboración bilateral con el ejército Argelino......................................... 8 • Regreso al pasado. El Regimiento Montesa recupera parte de su historia..................... 9 • La IX carrera del Ebro, con el río como gran protagonista ................................ 11 • Visita del JEME a la Brigada de Caballería Castillejos II................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas North Montana Dakota
    Kansas North Montana Dakota South Dakota Wyoming Nebraska Utah Colorado Kansas Kansas Partners Program Conservation Focus Areas Introduction and Overview visible on global satellite images. “Natural Kansas” edited by Joseph It is within this prairie landscape, T Collins, University Press of Kansas is known as the “Prairie where PFW program is needed. Kansas. State.” Often, people will drive With 97% of the state in private through and have the perception ownership (Kansas Department Focus Area Selection of miles and miles of nothing, not of Wildlife and Parks 2008), there even a tree. The lack of trees, are ample opportunities for the Through continued communication cities, and crop fields, or rather, the PFW program to assist ranchers with our conservation partners we presence of vast intact grasslands and farmers with voluntary fish established four focus areas for the is exactly what makes Kansas and wildlife habitat restoration KS PFW program. The Southwest unique. This feature provides an projects. Over time, invasive Kansas Prairies and Playas, North extraordinary view of the past and species, fragmentation, and poor Central Prairies, Flint Hills, and what the landscape can continue land management have led to Central Wetlands and Prairies to look like in the future. The fact degradation and loss of prairie prioritize our conservation efforts. that someone can drive and see only habitats, contributing to the decline Using Geographic Information miles and miles of unaltered terrain of numerous Federal trust species. Systems (GIS) technologies, we is beautiful to many. A landscape Through educational efforts and incorporated datasets created void of trees, forms the unique the application of appropriate by conservation partners that character of the prairie and hosts a land management strategies, the included; species habitat models, vast amount of native wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • From Easement to Stewardship Attorneys at Law Focuses on Oil Flint Hills Ranches Get a Conservation Boost and Gas, Energy, Environmental and Real Estate Law
    KANSAS Fall 2020 • nature.org/kansas Photos courtesy Jeff Kennedy and John Mize Jeff Kennedy and John Mize Join Board of Trustees The Nature Conservancy’s Kansas Board of Trustees is pleased to announce two attorneys, Jeff Kennedy (Wichita) and John Mize Cattle drive in the Flint Hills, Chase county, Kansas © Ryan Donnell (Salina), have joined their ranks. Jeff’s practice at Martin Pringle, From Easement to Stewardship Attorneys at Law focuses on oil Flint Hills ranches get a conservation boost and gas, energy, environmental and real estate law. He served Conservation easements have long been of Kansas and Oklahoma. Stewardship on the Kansas Energy Council an important tool to protect farms, assistance may be in the form of help with and was a member of the Kansas ranches and working forests across the prescribed burning, equipment loans, Energy & Environmental Policy United States. They have been especially mapping of invasive species or cost- Advisory Group. effective in the Flint Hills, where nearly all share dollars. Emphasis will be placed on the land is privately owned and more than enhancing biodiversity of the property, John recently retired from Clark, 110,000 acres have been permanently and ongoing monitoring of plant and Mize and Linville, Chartered protected with conservation easements. animal communities will measure success. after a long career practicing While easements are an effective strategy health care and non-profit to curb the threat of development of “Layering this additional conservation law. He has served on the native grasslands, other conservation on top of easements advances our goal of Kansas Commission on Judicial challenges remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation of the Fort Riley Military Reservation Kansas
    VVEGETATION OF THE FFORT RRILEY MMILITARY RRESERVATION,, KKANSAS Craig C. Freeman1 and Jennifer M. Delisle2 1R. L. McGregor Herbarium & Kansas Biological Survey University of Kansas, 2045 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047-3729 [email protected] 2Kansas Biological Survey University of Kansas, 2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047-3759 [email protected] VEGETATION OF THE FORT RILEY MILITARY RESERVATION, KANSAS Cover Photo: Gray Copper (Lycaena dione) on Sullivant’s milkweed (Asclepias sullivantii); Fort Riley Military Reservation, Geary County, Kansas. Photo by Craig C. Freeman, 2003. Report submitted February 27, 2004 Citation: Freeman, C. C. and J. M. Delisle. 2004. Vegetation of the Fort Riley Military Reservation, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 119. Kansas Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. 110 pp. Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................................................................III ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................................................IV ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting in Kansas Can Be
    Kansas Hunting Guide Hunting In Kansas unting in Kansas can be described with one word: Hvariety. From east to west, REGION 1 REGION 2 north to south, Kansas has a rich and diverse array of habitat and game species. The hunting heritage runs deep in Kansas, and hunting is important to the quality of life and REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 rural economies. Unique hunting opportunities wait on the eastern and western borders, and the cen- tral region provides a blend. The physiographic regions of the state, distinguished by climatic, topographic and vegetative differ- ences, allow such variety. Generally, Kansas’ climate is wetter In the northcentral part of the state, The far northeastern corner of the in the east than the west. In fact, the the Smoky Hills follow the Smoky state is the Glaciated Region. This southeast region may receive 40 Hill River to the east. The Smoky Hills region features gently rolling plains inches of rain per year, whereas the region is characterized by vast areas with broad stream valleys. It is char- southwest region may receive less of rolling grassland and some dra- acterized by heavily timbered, rocky than 15. Being familiar with the matic topography. The land is farmed hillsides and small irregular crop- physiographic regions can help a along the river bottoms, and this com- lands. This region provides excellent hunter select an area of the state to bination of permanent native cover deer and turkey hunting, as well as correspond with the preferred type and agriculture provides pheasant, bobwhite quail, rabbit, and squirrel of game, as well as the style of quail, prairie chicken, turkey, and opportunities.
    [Show full text]