Newsletter Jul 03

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter Jul 03 03 July 2020 Taiwan, Somaliland to set up representative offices he Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) announced, July 1, that TTaiwan and the Republic of So- maliland will set up respective repre- sentative offices in Hargeisa and Taipei City in the near future. The move comes a matter of months after the signing of a bilateral protocol by MOFA Minister Jaushieh Joseph Wu and Somaliland Foreign and Interna- tional Cooperation Minister Yasin Hagi Mohamoud in February. Taiwan joins the likes of the United King- dom, Denmark, Ethiopia, Turkey, Djibou- ti, Canada, the European Union and the United Nations, all of whom have rep- resentative offices in the self-declared ues of freedom, democracy, justice and ly by both President Tsai Ing-wen and east African nation. the rule of law, before adding that both Somaliland President, Muse Bihi Abdi, Minister Wu described the agreement sides had been enhancing cooperation with President Tsai stating that Taiwan as based on bilateral friendship and a since 2009. looks forward to expanding “mutually shared commitment to the common val- The announcement was greeted warm- beneficial cooperation” with Somaliland. MOFA strongly condemns passage of Hong Kong national security law n an announcement June 30, the Min- Taiwan eases entry regulations istry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) strongly for foreign nationals Icondemned the passage of the Hong ntry restrictions for foreign Kong national security law by the Stand- nationals looking to travel to ing Committee of China’s National Peo- ETaiwan continued to ease, ple’s Congress. June 29. MOFA described the new law as a “com- Individuals planning on visiting Tai- plete negation” of the commitments made The ministry further added that Taiwan wan for reasons other than tourism by the Chinese Communist Party at the will not “stand idly by”, citing the launch or social visits are now permitted to handover of Hong Kong that its way of life of the Hong Kong Humanitarian Aid Proj- apply for a special entry permit at would “remain unchanged for 50 years”. ect, and the opening of the Taiwan-Hong their local R.O.C. overseas mission, Stating that the law will “seriously under- Kong Office for Exchanges and Services. the Ministry of Foreign Affairs an- mine” the high degree of autonomy that MOFA was joined in their condemnation nounced. Those wishing to study the city has previously enjoyed, MOFA by the Presidential Office Spokesperson, Mandarin in Taiwan, however, must urged the Chinese government to respect Xavier Chang, who described the move as comply with the conditions set the freedom and human rights of Hong proof of the inviability of “one country, two forth by the Ministry of Education. Kong citizens. s y s t e m s ”. Nevertheless, all foreign nationals Taiwan releases 3rd national report on UN human rights covenants must, upon entry, present an En- he Executive Yuan published Tai- administration had spared no effort in glish-language certificate of a neg- wan’s third national report on the promoting human and economic rights. ative COVID-19 test taken within Timplementation of the U.N. Inter- In particular, the Premier highlighted the three working days of their flight to national Covenant on Civil and Politi- passage of same-sex marriage legisla- Taiwan, and subsequently undergo cal Rights and the International Cove- tion, the establishment of a National Hu- a 14-day quarantine period once nant on Economic, Social and Cultural man Rights Museum, and the upcoming they arrive in the country. Rights, June 29. formation of a National Human Rights Editorial: Taipei Representative Office in the EU and Belgium During an event marking the launch of Commission later this year. Website: http://www.roc-taiwan.org/be_en/index.html the report, Premier Su Tseng-chang, cel- The report is due to be reviewed by E-mail: [email protected] ebrated the work of all those involved in international scholars and experts in Tel: +32(0)2/287.28.16 or +32(0)2/287.28.11 making Taiwan a better, more advanced March 2021, according to the Ministry of nation, and said that the Tsai Ing-wen Justice..
Recommended publications
  • Here Are to Subscribe, Visit Several Factors That Militate Against This Move
    Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 5 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 5. Issue1 5 KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Implications of Coronavirus Outbreak on Taiwan’s Campaign for the World Health Organization By: I-wei Jennifer Chang Reinvigorating Taiwan’s Role as Asia’s NGO Hub By: J. Michael Cole An American Perspective on Australia’s Approach to the Taiwan Strait By: Michael Mazza Potential Downsides to US-China Trade Tensions on Taiwan’s Economy By: Ali Wyne KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes The Global Taiwan Brief is a bi-week- ly publication released every other By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Wednesday and provides insight into Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute and the editor-in-chief the latest news on Taiwan. of the Global Taiwan Brief. Ingrid Bodeen is currently a student at George Washington Editor-in-Chief University and an intern at the Global Taiwan Institute. Russell Hsiao In the first significant temperature taken of the political climate within Taiwan after the Staff Editor Katherine Schultz January 2020 presidential and legislative elections, the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang Copy Editor or KMT) held a special by-election on March 7 to elect the Party’s new chairman. Eligi- Marshall Reid ble party members had to choose between two candidates: former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌, b. 1952) and legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣, b. 1972). The elec- The views and opinions expressed tion—scheduled after the former chairman and members of the Party’s Central Standing in these articles are those of the Committee (CSC) resigned—saw Chiang emerge as the clear victor.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Connections a Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations China-Taiwan Relations: A Year for Consolidation David G. Brown Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies President Ma’s inaugural mentioned no new initiatives, confirming that this would be a year for consolidating relations rather than making breakthroughs in cross-strait relations. While Beijing understands Ma’s domestic position, it continues nudging Ma and Taiwan to move beyond economic issues. The 8th ARATS-SEF meeting in August finally concluded the long-stalled investment agreement – a significant step – but only by finessing key contentious issues. Debates within the DPP over its policy toward Beijing continue. However, initial decisions by new DPP chairman Su Tseng-chang indicate that the party is not yet willing to adjust its policy. President Ma has taken steps to underline the ROC claims to the Diaoyutai Islands. Ma inaugural As soon as Ma Ying-jeou won re-election in January attention shifted to what he would say about cross-strait relations in his second inaugural address on May 20. Four years earlier, he enunciated core aspects of his policy including his “three noes” – no independence, no unification, no use of force – and mentioned that Taipei would also enter consultations on a possible peace agreement. Knowing how important such statements are in setting future agendas, Beijing had quietly been making it known through several channels that it hoped for an indication that relations could move forward in some politically significant way. Progress on economic issues was assumed; Beijing wanted something on the political front. Specifically, Beijing communicated its hope that Ma would drop the “no unification” element of his “three noes.” Ma also got advice from an opposite quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the Representative Taiwan
    MESSAGE FROM THE REPRESENTATIVE The approach of Christmas and the New Year always provides much time for reflection, and I am pleased to say that we have made steady progress in the bilateral ties between the UK and Taiwan since my arrival in London in late August. This progress has encompassed a wide range of fields, from education to renewable energy and gives us much to build upon as we proceed into 2017. December characteristically sees a great amount of activity throughout our diplomatic missions around the world. Our Christmas receptions for our allies in parliament and the diplomatic corps were a great success, functioning as an excellent opportunity to bring together Taiwan’s friends and to express our gratitude for the hard work and support which they have shown consistently throughout the year. We have recently welcomed Taiwan’s Minister Without Portfolio to the UK, where she delivered two excellent speeches here in London, showcasing to a global audience Taiwan’s efforts to promote open government through digital tools. I was also delighted to make a trip to the Kent constituency of South Thanet, where I had the pleasure of advancing UK-Taiwan ties in renewable energy with Mr Craig Mackinlay, the constituency’s MP. The year 2016 has in many respects been a remarkable one, having been characterised by much change. For Taiwan, this year constituted the second peaceful transfer of governmental powers in the country’s history and was another testament to the success of our democracy. While significant changes may bring challenges, they also often bring significant opportunities and I am confident we will be able to utilise these throughout the months and years ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • President Tsai Meets Czech Senate President Miloš Vystrčil
    04 September 2020 President Tsai meets Czech Senate President Miloš Vystrčil resident Tsai Ing-wen met with Czech Republic Senate President PMiloš Vystrčil, September 3, as she posthumously conferred the Order of Pro- pitious Clouds with Special Grand Cordon on the late Czech Senate President Jaro- slav Kubera. The meeting came as the Czech leader rounded out his momentous six-day visit to Taiwan, in which he has led an 89-member delegation, met with various Taiwanese of- ficials, oversaw the signing of three Memo- randums of Understanding, and delivered a landmark speech to the Legislative Yuan. In remarks delivered after meeting the Senate President, President Tsai thanked provide mutual support. In addition to President Tsai, Vystrčil also Vystrčil and the delegation members for Likewise, in his remarks, Senate President met with Vice President Lai Ching-te, Pre- their support, adding that she believes their Vystrčil thanked President Tsai for the mier Su Tseng-chang and Minister of For- visit will spark a new wave, encouraging warm reception and care that the delega- eign Affairs Jaushieh Joseph Wu during his others to engage in reciprocal visits, and tion had received in Taiwan. visit. Czech Republic senate president delivers landmark Legislative Yuan address zech Senate President Miloš Vystrčil port those who are committed to freedom makes Vystrčil the first figure to deliver delivered a landmark speech to the and democracy, he explained, saying that such remarks while not representing a for- CLegislative Yuan, September 1, in is why he was honored to visit Taiwan as mal diplomatic ally. which he reiterated his staunch support for a representative of the Czech Republic’s Vystrčil powerfully ended his speech echo- Taiwan and for global democratic values.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Taiwan's February 28
    The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Yen-Kuang Kuo, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee The History and Politics of Taiwan’s February 28 Incident, 1947- 2008 by Yen-Kuang Kuo BA, National Taiwan Univeristy, Taiwan, 1991 BA, University of Victoria, 2007 MA, University of Victoria, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Zhongping Chen, Supervisor Department of History Dr. Gregory Blue, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. John Price, Departmental Member Department of History Dr. Andrew Marton, Outside Member Department of Pacific and Asian Studies iii Abstract Taiwan’s February 28 Incident happened in 1947 as a set of popular protests against the postwar policies of the Nationalist Party, and it then sparked militant actions and political struggles of Taiwanese but ended with military suppression and political persecution by the Nanjing government. The Nationalist Party first defined the Incident as a rebellion by pro-Japanese forces and communist saboteurs. As the enemy of the Nationalist Party in China’s Civil War (1946-1949), the Chinese Communist Party initially interpreted the Incident as a Taiwanese fight for political autonomy in the party’s wartime propaganda, and then reinterpreted the event as an anti-Nationalist uprising under its own leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Cbms in Cross-Strait Relations
    The Role of CBMs in Cross-Strait Relations Policy Report from the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Workshop Uppsala Sweden, December 15, 2005 Niklas L.P. Swanström Sofia K. Ledberg The Role of CBMs in Cross-Strait Relations Policy Report following the Silk Road Studies Program Workshop Uppsala, Sweden, December 15, 2005 Niklas L.P. Swanström Sofia K. Ledberg © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Uppsala University, Box 514, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “The Role of CBMs in Cross-Strait Relations” is published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic, independent and externally funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Uppsala and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University and the Department of Eurasian Studies at Uppsala University. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America and is today firmly established as a leading center for research and policy worldwide, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region; and to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion of the region through applied research, publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Newsletter
    President Tsai delivers a speech at the Ketagalan Forum: 2019 Asia-Pacific Security Dialogue IN THE NEWSLETTER Key events featured in this issue include President Tsai’s opening the Ketagalan Forum: 2019 Asia-Pacific Security Dialogue and comments on clashes in Hong Kong and rejecting China’s accusations of interference, Foreign Minister Joseph Wu’s calls for building an inclusive UN with Taiwan on board, Minister of Transportation and Communications urging support for Taiwan’s participation in ICAO, Representative Lin’s interview with Monocle, a delegation of experts from UK think tanks visiting Taiwan, Representative Lin visiting Bath, the success of Taiwan-UK pork trade cited in a UK government report, Taiwan Changhua County Magistrate leading a delegation to visit the UK, Taiwan and UK universities signing an MoU to boost collaboration in offshore wind energy, the TRO hosting forums across the UK promoting recruitment of young talent and scientific collaboration, Taiwanese groups performing at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Taiwan’s “Oh Bear” balloon at the Bristol International Balloon Fiesta and a Taiwanese illustrator’s participation in the International Book Festival. President Tsai Ing-wen opens the Ketagalan Forum: 2019 Asia-Pacific Security Dialogue On 20 August, the president opened the Ketagalan Forum: 2019 Asia-Pacific Security Dialogue, a day-long forum hosted by the Prospect Foundation on behalf of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs which aims to advance cooperation with like-minded partners in the fields of regional peace, prosperity and stability. The forum focused on four main topics: cross-strait stability, the Indo-Pacific strategy as well as China’s behaviour in the South China Sea and power projection in the Pacific, featuring speeches from President Tsai, Taiwan Deputy Foreign Minister Szu-chien Hsu, former Australian Defence Minister Christopher Payne, Center for the National Interest (CFTNI) Lieutenant General Wallace C.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren History and Agency
    China Perspectives 2010/3 | 2010 Taiwan: The Consolidation of a Democratic and Distinct Society Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren History and Agency Dominic Meng-Hsuan et Mau-Kuei Chang Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5310 DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5310 ISSN : 1996-4617 Éditeur Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Édition imprimée Date de publication : 15 septembre 2010 ISSN : 2070-3449 Référence électronique Dominic Meng-Hsuan et Mau-Kuei Chang, « Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren », China Perspectives [En ligne], 2010/3 | 2010, mis en ligne le 01 septembre 2013, consulté le 28 octobre 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/5310 ; DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.5310 © All rights reserved Special Feature s e v Understanding the Nuances i a t c n i e of Waishengren h p s c r History and Agency e p DOMINIC MENG-HSUAN YANG AND MAU-KUEI CHANG In the late 1940s and early 50s, the world witnessed a massive wave of political migrants out of Mainland China as a result of the Chinese civil war. Those who sought refuge in Taiwan with the KMT came to be known as the “mainlanders” or “ waishengren .” This paper will provide an overview of the research on waishengren in the past few decades, outlining various approaches and highlighting specific political and social context that gave rise to these approaches. Finally, it will propose a new research agenda based on a perspective of migration studies and historical/sociological analysis. The new approach argues for the importance of both history and agency in the study of waishengren in Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • SA-Taiwan Enews March 2020.Pub
    Taipei Liaison Office in the RSA SA---TAIWAN-TAIWAN eNews MARCH 26TH 2020 PUBLPUBLISHER:ISHER: MATTHEW CHOU ISSUE 3 I, and the South African Government, have enormous appreciation for the contribution that the Government of the Republic of China (Taiwan) has made to the commitment of the Govern- ment sector in the economic development in Africa. The ROC (Taiwan) further, made a gener- ous and much appreciated contribution to South Africa's transition to democracy . Statement by President Nelson Mandela —27 November 1996 Taipei Liaison Office Public Notice The South African Government email to [email protected] by sending an email to tlorsav- has officially announced a national [email protected] or a text message lockdown starting from the 26 th of For ROC (Taiwan) nationals who to 082-906-1413. March 2020 at Midnight to the seek emergency assistance in an 16 th of April 2020 in response to event of “severe injuries” or We will try our best to assist the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) “threats to personal safety” and promptly. Expect a delay in re- epidemic. other probable emergencies, sponding to your queries should please call our emergency assis- we receive a lot of enquiries. As a result, the Taipei Liaison Of- tance line at (+27) 082-802-9380. Please be assured that your re- fice in the Republic of South Africa Kindly note that this hotline DOES quests and enquiries will be at- will be closed during this time in NOT provide consular services. tended to and responded to in due compliance with the lockdown course.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue in China-Europe Relations” Shanghai, China September 21-22, 2015
    12th Annual Conference on “The Taiwan Issue in China-Europe Relations” Shanghai, China September 21-22, 2015 A workshop jointly organised by the German Institute for International and Security Affairs / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS), Shanghai. With friendly support of the Friedrich-Ebert- Stiftung (Shanghai Office). Discussion Paper Do not cite or quote without author’s permission New Characteristics of Future Cross-Straits Relations and New Challenges Hu Lingwei Shanghai East Asia Institute New Characteristics of Future Cross-Straits Relations and New Challenges Hu Lingwei In recent years, as seen from the course of observing the Taiwan Straits’ situation, on the one hand, social activities in Taiwan were very active, and many people, especially the young generation, expressed opinions on some topics, and actively participated in social and political life, not only impacting Taiwan’s political situation, but also exerting profound influence on cross-Straits relations; on the other hand, under the joint influence of the mainland, Taiwan and international factors, the cross-Straits relations and Taiwan Straits’ situation maintained a steady trend of development. Through analyzing and studying the current and future cross-Straits relations, we can see that though cross-Straits relations have encountered some new complicated situations emerging in Taiwan’s society, overall cross-Straits relations have maintained the momentum of steady development and shown new characteristics. In view of the new characteristics manifested by cross-Straits relations, actively and properly handling new problems facing future cross-Straits relations is conducive to promoting and maintaining the trend of steady development of cross-Straits relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and the Housing “Questions” in Taiwan
    Gender and the Housing “Questions” in Taiwan Yi-Ling Chen Associate Professor Global and Area Studies/ Geography University of Wyoming [email protected] Abstract This paper argues that the housing system is not only capitalist but also patriarchal by analyzing how the interrelations of the state, housing market, and the family reproduce gender divisions. In contrast to the housing condition of the working class in pre-welfare state Europe, as originally described by Friedrich Engels, Taiwan’s housing system was constructed by an authoritarian developmental state that repressed labor movements and emphasized economic development over social welfare. However, since the late 1980s, pro-market housing policies have greatly enhanced the commodification of housing, resulting in a unique combination of high homeownership rates, high vacancy rates, and high housing prices. This paper examines the formation of housing questions in Taiwan and its impact on women. In doing so it reveals how a social housing movement emerged in the context of a recent housing boom – on that that has occurred despite a global economic downturn – and which could provide an opportunity for feminist intervention within the housing system to transform gender relations. Published with Creative Commons licence: Attribution–Noncommercial–No Derivatives Gender and the Housing “Questions” in Taiwan 640 Introduction Housing prices in Taiwan have nearly doubled since the most recent housing boom, which began in 2005. This escalation has led to a strong social housing movement for renters, beginning in Taiwan in 2010. Social rental housing itself is a new idea, because most of the government-constructed housing has been sold to the buyers at subsidized prices, so the number of available social rental properties remains extremely small: with only about 0.08 percent of the housing stock qualifying as social rental housing.
    [Show full text]