SHORT COMMUNICATION

Incidence of Diamonds in the Beach Sands of the Coast,

T. K. RAU Director, Project Dlamond, OP: A.P., Geological Survey of InQa, SR,Hyderabad - 560 068 Email: gsxhyd@hydap nlc in

Abstract: Mxcro- and macro-diamondswere recovered and studled from the heavy mlneral concentrates of beach samples from the southern tlp of Jnd~a.Ranglng In slze from 0.30 mm x 0 30 rnm to 1.50 rnm x 2.05 mm, the diamonds are the rnod~fiedforms of octahedron, dodecahedron and cube and their combinat~ons.Blgger stzes are represented by the broken / cleaved fragments. The dlamonds exhlblt vaned trnts of whlch whlte, plnk and yellow are prominent. lhsIS the second report of dlamonds from the beach sands of Indla and the first of its klnd from the Kanyakumarl coast w~th charnocklte and khondalite suites of rocks exposed tn the hinterland, whlch shows an Important structural gram In the form of the WNW-ESE trendlng Achankovil shear zone passlng close to the present occurrence The possible ultra-hgh pressure metamorph~cand shock ongins of these diamonds In SGT are discussed.

Keywords: Drrtmonds, Beach sands, Kanyakumarl coast, Tarml Nadu

Introduction investigation by wide spaced vibrocor~ngon grid The Marine Wing of Geological Survey of Indra has revealed relatively higher accumulat~onof placer mtnerals extensively investigated the beach and offshore sediments In the near shore area between Inayam (Tarn11 Nadu) and of both the east and west coast of Indla for their mineral Vizhinjam () with an estimated placer mineral reserve potential for the last four decades. In the recent past, National of 4.716 MT In the top 1 m sediments of the seabed over an Instrtute of Oceanography and Geological Survey of area of 52.52 sq. krn with a break up of 3 055 MT of ilrnenrte, have carrred out Intensive offshore placer exploration. The leucoxene and rutile, 0.185 MT of zircon, 0.143 MT of Geological Survey of India discovered s~zeableplacer Monazite, 1.084 MT of sillimanite and 0.249 MT of garnets deposits along both the east and west coasts of Ind~aduring (Nambiar et al. 2002). the late eightles and the nineties. Atornlc Mlnerals In th~sscenario, the first ever report of microdiamond Directorate for Exploration and Research has estimated a (63 - 73 microns) was from the beach piacers of the total reserve of 632 MT of placer mlnerals over a length of Krishna-Godavari delta along the east coast of Andhra 2642 km of beach along the east and west coasts of India, Pradesh (Subrahmanyam et al. 2005). The present report consisting 348 MT of ~lmenite,18 MT of rutile, 21 MT of of micro- and macro-diamonds is from the beach sands zircon, 8 MT of monazite, 107 MT of garnet and 130 MT near Pulrmanikulam, located at about 37 km ENE of of sillimanite (Ali et al. 2001, 1998; Krishnan, 2000; Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, the southern tip of India (Flg. 1). Mukherjee, 2000). The modern beaches of southwest coast of Ind~aattain Recovery of Heavy Minerals significance owing to high concentrations of rlmenlte and Three sand samples, each weighrng 2-3 kg, were other heavy minerals (Mallick, 1974; Mallick et al. 1987). collected across the beach (08'3 1'28": 77"47'47" 58H/16) Amongst these, extensive placer deposits are located along over a distance of about 1 km, covering the wave front, beach the Chavara, Manavalakurichi and Midalam beach placer dunes and termite mounds. These were washed, dned and belts with h~ghconcentrat~ons of ilrnenite, garnet, sillimanlte, jlgged rn hand-operated Garytz's Jig. The jig concentrates monazite, zircon and Ieucoxene in decreasing order of were subjected to heavy liquid separat~onusing bromoforrn abundance (Unn~krishnanet al. 2002). Systematic sea-bed (Sp-gr.1.89). Each of the sample concentrates, weighing mapping by surficial sampling followed by preliminary around 40-60 g, was examined under btnocular microscope.

JOUR GEOL SOC INDIA, VOL 67,JAN 2006 SHORT COMMUNICATION

0' 77" 0' 15' 30 45' 78" 8" 30'

- 15'

I I

INDIAN OCEAN 8" 8" 0' 1 I I 0' 30' 77" 0' 15' 45' 78" 0' Fig.1, Location map of diamondiferous beach placeres near Pulimanikularn, 37 km ENE of Kanyakurnari, Tamil Nadu.

These are rich in pinkish and reddish brown garnets, ilrnenite, nos.) show a size range of 0.30 mm x 0.35 mm - 1.50 rnrn x leucoxeae, sillimanite, zircon, diamond, monazite and rutile 2.05 mm,falling in the categories of microdiamond (~1.0 in that order of decreasing abundance. The heavy mmsize)aswellasmacrodiarnond(>1.0mrnsize).These concentrates of samples from the surf zone, dunes and grains exhibit high relief due to high R.I. (2.52), strong termite mounds show predominantly garnets, ilrnenite and dispersion, adamantine luster, isotropic nature and both respectively. surface features like, etch marks (Figs.2.E, F, I), striations (Figs-ZE,H), trigons (Figs.2D, F, I) and stepped-growths Recovery of Diamonds (Fig.2H) that are characteristic of diamond. These are A total number of 207 grains resembling diamond in crystallographically modified forms of cube (Figs.2A, B, F, crystal habit, brilliance and surface morphology were G), octahedron (Figs.2A, C, F), dodecahedron (Figs.2A, B, separated from the three samples by picking with a wet brush, D) their combinations (Figs.2A, C, F) and brokenkleaved and kept immersed in HF (40% GR) in a small Teflon beaker fragments (Figs.2H). Some crystals show globular for 48 hours. Subsequently, the grains were kept in a Teflon (modified dodecahedrons) (Fig.2B) and pear (distorted beaker with a 2:5 ratio solution of 1:1 HF and 1:1 HNO, octahedrons) (Figs.2A, C) shapes. The percentages of size and heated to dryness in a water bath, and again heated with vs. crystal forms of diamonds (195 Nos.) are presented in 2: 1HNO, to dryness. The acid treatment must have dissolved Table 1. Around 70% of diamonds, which are mainly silicate heavies (garnet, zircon, sillimanite and kyanite) and modified forms of octahedron and dodecahedron, fall within phosphate heavies (xenotime and monazite), if present the size range of 0.30 rnrn x 0.30 mrn - 0.60 mm x 0.70 mm. amongst these grains. Further, the residual grains were kept Cleaved and broken fragments falling in the size range of immersed in HF (40% GR) for 72 hours. A total of 195 0.75 mm x 1.OO mm - 1.50 rnrn x 2.05 rnm represent around grains sustained the series of acid tests. These did not show 18% of diamond population. The diamonds display a wide even the lslightest kind of acid corrosion on their surfaces. variety of colours like, white (58%) and black (3%) (Fig.2G) In fact, they became more brilliant due to loss of surface and faint tints of pink (23%), yellow (14%), blue (1%) and coatings. brown (1%). They contain isolated tiny jet-black inclusions, which sometimes occur as dusty trains following the Study of Diamonds crystallographic directions. These inclusions could be Weighing 0.335 carats in total, the diamond grains (195 titanian magnetite, ilmenite or graphite. A majority of the

JOUR GEOL.SOC.INDIA, VOL.67, JAN. 2006 SHORT COMMUNICATION

Fig.2. Crystal forms and morphology of diamonds from the beach sands of Kanyakumari. A - Octahedron, dodecahedron and combination forms. B - Modified forms of cube and dodecahedron. C - Combination forms ofoctahedron and dodecahedron. D - Dodecahedron showing etch marks and trigons. E - Dodecahedron showing etch marks. F - Distorted octahedron showing etch marks and trigons. G - Bort - a modified form of cube. H - Cleaved fragment showing stepped octahedral growth. I - Distorted octahedron showing etch marks.

diamonds show brilliant white and bright yellow glow under tertiary source (Quaternary and Recent placers), are not the short-wave UV Lamp, whereas a minor population known in the hinterland of the present study area. So far, remains inert under both the long- and short-wave UV there are no diamond reports either fiom the beaches or the Lamps. offshore regions of the east and west coasts, where Geological Survey of India and National Institute of Discussion Oceanography had conducted extensive marine exploratory The commonly attributed source for diamond, primary activities during the last four decades or in the hinterlands source (kimberlite clan rocks), secondary source in Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The possibility of diamonds (Proterozoic, Eocene and Mio-Pliocene conglomerates) and getting drifted by the long-shore currents from Andhra

JOUR.GEOL.SOC.INDlA, VOL.67, JAN. 2006 SHORT COMMUNICATION

Table I. Percentages of sue vs dtfferent crystal forms of dlamonds

Crystal forms / shapes ges of dlamond gralns

------Octahedro~ds(modlfied forms) Pear-shaped (dls torfed octahedrons) Dodecahedrolds (modlfied forms) Globular forms (rnod~fied dodecahedra1 forms) Cubolds (distorted forms) Cubo-octahedrolds (modlfied forms) Fragments

Pradesh coast, where rnlcrodlarnonds are known to occur metarnorphlc event (Dobrzh~netskayaet a1 , 1994), and (Subrahrnanyam et a1 2005), to the study area appears to (111) dlamonds of mantle ongln (KOL), whlch were deposited be remote in sediments that were metamorphosed (Marakushev In fact, the hinterland for the study area forms a part of et a1 1995) M~crodlamondsenclosed In garnet, kyanlte the Southern Granulite Terrain (SGT), which comprises and zlrcon were detected in quartzofeldspathlc rocks rna~nlycharnocklte and khondahte sultes of rocks emplaced (Gnel ss-Eclogl te Unl t) from the central Saxonlan w~thgranlte and alkah syenite plutons and ultrarnafic and Erzgeblrge, Germany (Massonne, 1998) A slgn~ficantburial carbonatrte plugs wlth associated major shears, vlz of the diamondlferous gneisses to earth depths of at Dharmapuri shear, Moyar-B havani shear, Palghat shear and least 130 km sultable for d~arnondformation occurred (op Achankovtl shear Alkaline - Carbonatite Complexes crt) It IS ~nterest~ngto record that the dlamonds of (ACCs) of Tam11 Nadu, dated around 770 - 800 Ma, are melamorphlc rocks are dominated by cubo~dsand cubo- known to contaln ultramafic associations, vrz dunlte, octahedral crystals, whereas those of k~mberlltesand pendotite, pyroxenlte and carbonatite at Elagirr, Koratti, Iamproltes by the rounded slngle-crystals (Shatsky et a1 Samalpattl, Pakkanadu and Salem (Mazumdar et al 2000) 1998) Nevertheless, nelther diamonds nor kimberl~teclan rocks The occurrences of macrodlamonds In UHPM rocks In (KCRs) are reported anywhere In SGT till now It IS not Kazakhstan and In the quartzofeldspathlc rocks In central known whether the ACCs contain any prlmary source Saxonian Erzgeblrge, Germany encourage the Ind~an rocks However, ACCs (770 - 800 Ma) are much younger Investigators to look for slrnllar occurrences In the granulites to the known KCRs (I. 100 - 1350 Ma) of Andhra Pradesh, of SGT Not to be Ignored and equally Important 1s the shock Orlssa and Madhya Pradesh Though the younger KCRs (zmpact) orlgln propounded for the d~slrnondsof the Canyon are not yet known In Indla, the posstbility of discovering Dlablo meteorrte (Nlnlnger, 1956) Discovery of Impact them In ACCs cannot be ruled out, as occurrences of diamonds In the rocks of a terrestrial meteorit~ccrater at even Tertlary KCRs are known elsewhere In the world Poplga~astrobleme In Russia enhanced the scope further The interest of researchers In mrcrodiamonds from (Masa~trset a1 1972) Now, several slmrlar occurrences of kimberli tes, larnproites, metarnorphac rocks and alluvtum Impact dlarnonds, such as the Rles crater, Germany (Rost et deposits has recently been Increased (Shatsky et a1 1998) a1 1978), Kara and Puchezh-Katunskl Impact structures of Microd~amondswere discovered zn sltu In ultra-hrgh Russld (Ezersky, 1982, Marakushev et a1 1993), the Obolon, pressure metarnorphlc (UHPM) rocks (garnet cllno- Il'ntsy, Terny and Zapadny craters of the Ukraine (Gurov et pyroxenites) from the Kokchetav massif, northern al 1995, Val'ter et a1 1992, Val'ter and Er'omenko, 1996) Kazakhstan (Sobolev and Shatsky, 1990) These were and the Lappajarvl astrobleme In Flnland (Masalts et a1 thought to be (1) d~arnondsgrew stably under UHPM 1999), have come to light Besrdes, redeposited lmpact condltlons wlth~nthe equxlibrrum stablllty field during a dlarnonds are known to occur in unconsol~datedCenozo~c metarnorphlc event (Sobolev and Shatsky, 1990), sedlments, whlch were disseminated to form strewn f~elds (11) dlamonds of metamorph~corigin thdt grew metastably around the Pop~galcrater (Vishnevsky et a1 1997) The below the dlamond equslibrzum pressure durlng a diamonds In beach placers in the present study area rnlght

JOUR GEOL SOC INDIA, VOL 67, JAN 2006 SHORT COMMUNICATION 15

have been contributed from such terrains, whlch were never rndicates the amazlng figures of 33 50 caratsftonne or 3350 thought to be dlarnondiferous Thought spreads over a w~de carats1100 tonnes arena, but more concerted efforts wrth a rnultld~scrpl~nary conceptual approach is needed to unearth the source rocks AcknowEedg~ments The assrstance rendered by Shn V Slruvas for the dlamond In the study area, besrdes explorrng it further Choudary and Shri S Raw, officers of Project Dlamond, in for rts d~amondpotentlal~ty from the economic po~ntof vlew laboratory stud~esincluding photom~crographyand literature In vlew of so many d~arnondgrarns (we~gh~ng0 335 carats consultat~onIS thankfully acknowledged The Director General, Geolog~calSurvey of Indla 1s thanked for permission to publ~sh In total) flashing out of so little a quantity of samples the present work Dr S K Bhushan, Deputy Dlrector General, (el0 kg), the beach deserves a detailed probe Though Southern Reg~onand Shn K T Vtdyadharan, Deputy Dlrector premature at the present stage of ~nvestigation,one cannot General, OP Andhra Pradesh, Geolog~calSurvey of Indra are resrst estirnatlng the dlamond potentla1 of the beach sands sincerely thanked for provldlng all the facllltles and unst~nted of Pultmanikulam based on the ava~labledata, whlch encouragement dunng the course of present work

References

ALI,M A , VISWANATHAN,G and KRISHNAN,S (1998) Beach and The d~amondstn the rmpactttes of the Pop~ga~meteontic crater xnland sand placer depostts of India - Influence of geology, Zapskt Vsesouzuogo Mlneralog~cheskogoObstchestva, v 101, geomorphology and late Quaternary Sea level osc~llatlonsin pp 208-113 thelr formation The National Symposlum on late Quaternary MASA~IS,V 1 , SHAFRANOVSKY,G I , FEDONOVA, 1 G , KOIVISTO,hd geology and sea level changes and the Annual Convention of and KORHONEN,J V (1998) Lappajarvi Astrobleme The first the Geological Soc~etyof Ind~a,held at Cochln University of find of ~mpactd~amonds on the Fennoscandian Shield Science and Technology, Cochln, India, Abstract Volume, Lunar and Planetary Sclence Conference, 29 Abstract PP 53 No 1171 DOBRZHINETSKAYA,L F, BRAUN, T V and SHESHKEL,G G and MASSONNE,H J (1998) A new occurrence of mcrod~amondsIn PODKUIKO,YA (1994) Geology and structure of dlamond- Quartzofeldspathic rocks of the Saxonian Erzgeb~rge, bearing rocks of the Kokchetav mass~f(Kazakhstan) Germany, and thelr metamorphic evolution VII IKC, Tectonophysics, v 233, pp 293-3 !3 Unzvers~tyOf Cape Town, South Afnca, V 11, P (Nlxon Ed ), EZERSKY,V A (1 982) The shock metamorphosed carbon matter In pp 533-539 rmpactites Meteont~ka,v 41, pp 134- 140 (m Russlan) MAZUMDAR,S K , KAMESWARARAO, T and NATHAN,N P (2000) GIOVANN[PRATES[, ALESSANDRO LO GIUDICE, SERGEI VISHNEVSKY, Alkaline complexes of southern and eastern Indla - An over CLAYDIOMANFREDOTTI and CURZJOCIPR~ANI (2003) vlew Geol Surv Indla, Spl Pub No 55, pp 101-134 Cathodolurn~nescenceinvestigations on the Popigai, R~es,and MUKHERJEE,T K (2000) Inaugural Address - Exploitat~onof heavy Lappaj arv~~rnpact diamonds Amerlcan Mineralogist, v 88, mineral resources In Ind~aIn G V Rajamanickam (Ed ), Hand pp 1778-1787 Book of Placer M~neralDepos~ts, New Academ~cPubllshers, GUROV,E P, GUROVA,E P and RAKITSKAYA,R B (1995) Impact Delhi, pp 9-26 d~arnondsrn the craters of the Ukralnlan Sh~eldMeteontlcs, NAMBIAR,A R ,ABDULLA, N M , DINESH,A C ,GANGADHARAN, A V, ~31,pp 515-516 JAYAKUMAR,R , JAYAPRAKASH, C, KANNAN, S , RAO,M K, ~ISHNAN,S (2000) Pres~dentraladdress In G V Rajamanlckam CHARLU,T K , KUMARAN,K , RAMACHANDRAN, K V , PAI, P R , (Ed ), Hand Book of Placer Mlneral Deposits, New Academc RAHOTHAMAN,VK , ADIGA,K S ,UNNIKRISWNAN, E , NAIR, E V, Publlshers, Delhi, pp 27-30 VENKATARAMANA,P and ZAHEER, B (2002) Prospecting for MALLICK,T K (1974) Heavy mlneral placers In the beaches and offshore placer depos~tsIn the area between lnayam (Tam1 offshore areas - Their nature, ongin, econom~cpotential and Nadu) and Vizhlnjam (Kerala) in southwest coast of Ind~a exploration Indian Minerals, v 28(3 I), pp 39-46 Four Decades of Marine Sc~encesin Tnd~a- A Retrospect, MALLICK,T K , VASUDEVAN,V, ABY VERGHESSE, P and TERRY Natlonal Semnar Organized In connect~onwlth 150thYear MACHADO(1987) The black sand placer deposits of Kerala Celebrations of Geological Survey of India, March, 2001, beach, southwest Ind~aManne Geology, v 77, pp 129-150 pp 146-155 MARAKUSHEV,A A , PERTSEV, N N , ZOTOV,I A ,PANCYAKCH, N A NINLNGER,H H (1956) Arizona's meteonte crater Its past, present and CHERENKOVA,A P (1995) Some petrological aspects of and future, 232p World Press Inc , Denver, Colorado dlamond genesis Geology of Ore Depos~tsv 37, pp 105- 121 ROST,R , DOLGOV,Yu, A and VISHNEVSKY,S A (1978) Gas MARAKUSHEV,A A , BOGATYREV, 0 S , FENOGENOV, A D ,PANEYAKH, ~nclusionsand hlgh pressure polymorphs of carbon in the N A and FEDOSOVA,S P (1993) Impactogenesis and volcan~sm Impact glasses of the Reiss crater Doklady Akademi Nauk Petrology, v I, pp 571-595 (in Russran) SSSR, v 241, pp 695-698 (ln Russlan) MASAITIS,V 1 , FUTERGENDLER,S I and GNEVYSHEV,M A (1972) SHATSKY,V S , ZEDGENIZOV,D A , YEFIMOVA,E S , RYLOV,G M ,

JOUR GEOL SOC INDIA, VOL 67, JAN 2006 16 SHORT COMMUNICATION

DE CORTB,K and SOBOLEV,N V (1998) A cornpanson of of Manne Sclences In India - A Retrospect, Nat~onalSeminar morphology and physlcal properties of microdramonds from organized in connection with f 50'h Year Celebrat~onsof the mantle and crustal environments In Nixon (Ed ), VII IKC, Geolog~calSurvey of Indla, March 2001, Geol Surv India, University of Cape Town, South Afrlca, v 11, P, pp 757- SpI Pub No 74, pp I 65- 17 1 763 VAL'TER,A A and ER'OMENKO,G K (1996) Carbon minerals In Soeo~ov,N V and SHATSKY,VS (1990) Diamond ~nclusionsin rocks of astroblemes, Meteont~csand Planetary Sclence 3 1, garnets from rnetamorph~crocks a new environment for Supplement, p A 144 diamond forrnat~onNature, v 343, pp 742-746 VAL'TER,A A ER'ME~,G K , KVASNITSA,VN and POLKANOV, SUBRAHMANYAM,A V , ANIL KUMAR, V , DESAPATI,T , DESHMUKH, YU A (1992) The shock metamorph~cm~nerals of carbon, R D and VISWNATHAN,G (2005) Discovery of mlcro-diamonds 172p Naukova Durnka Press, Klev (mRusstan) in beach placers of the east coast, Andhra Pradesh, lndra Curr VISHNEVSKY,S A , AFANAS'EV,V P, ARGUMOV,K P and PAL'CHIK, SCI, v 88, No 8, pp 1227-1228 N A (1 997) Jmpacr diamonds thelr features, orlgln and UNNIKRTSHNAN,E , NAMBIAR, A R and VIDHYADHARAN,K T (2002) slgn~ficanceTransactmons of the UIGGM SO RAN, issue No Textural and m~neralog~calvanatron across a heavy mlneral 385, Novos~b~rskStberlan Branch of Russian Academy of rlch beach at Midalam, southwest coast of Ind~aFour Decades Sciences Press, 1997, l l Op (in Russzan & Eaglrslz)

(Recetved 19 September 200.5, Revlsedform accepted I5 October 2005)

JOUR GEOL SOC INDIA, VOL 67, JAN 2006