DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution of the Ontario Standing Orders Since 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution of the Ontario Standing Orders Since 1985 Evolution of the Ontario Standing Orders since 1985 by Adam D. McDonald Westminster style government is steeped in a thousand year tradition. Many of the processes originate in historical fights or reactions to external events rather than as conscious decisions. Ontario shares this long parliamentary history but over the last few decades, the province has undergone a number of radical changes. These have, in turn, altered the operation and political culture of the Legislative Assembly. This article will discuss changes in Ontario’s Parliament since 1985 and reactions to those changes. It will also suggest ways to improve the work of the Legislature. fter the American Revolution, United Empire Responsible government also means that Parliament Loyalists fled to the British colony of Canada. has four major functions. AThey brought with them ideas about English • To form a government; representative government and set up a colonial • To fund the government; government similar to that found in London. The • To have a government-in-waiting; government in Upper Canada (now Ontario) consisted • To hold the government to account. of a governor, an appointed Legislative Council, and an elected Legislative Assembly. The Legislative Council It is these tasks – all performed within a parliamentary and the governor (advised by a group known as the setting – that require rules to govern the processes of the Family Compact) had most of the political power. In fact, House. The rules are found mainly in the Standing Or- it was the excesses of the Family Compact that led to the ders. 1837 Rebellion and the introduction of responsible In the last century Ontario had a reputation for “boring government. politics”, mainly because of the 42 year rule of the Tories The establishment of responsible government in the starting in 1943. However the 1985 Liberal/NDP accord 1840s required that the executive (the Prime Minister and brought down this government and set in motion a num- his Cabinet) are responsible to the elected Legislative As- ber of procedural and behavioural changes that have sembly. They must govern from within the House and given the Assembly a reputation for boisterous and rau- with the permission of the House. For Upper Canada, cous behaviour. this was a watershed moment. For the first time, the Leg- The Hung Parliament of 1985 islative Assembly had the legitimate right to hold the government to account and to run the affairs of the col- Elections do not come much closer than Ontario’s in ony effectively. 1985. Frank Miller’s Progressive Conservative govern- ment squeaked by with 52 seats in the then-125 seat Leg- islature. The Liberal Party, led by David Peterson, won Adam D. McDonald was an Ontario Legislative Intern for 48 seats, while the New Democratic Party of Bob Rae 2004-2005. This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Annual earned 25 seats. The Conservatives had just watched Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association on June 4, their most beloved leader – Bill Davis – retire at the 2005. This author is grateful to present and former MPPs as well as to height of his popularity. They had governed the province legislative staff interviewed in the preparation of this paper. AUTUMN 2005 / CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW 33 for more than 42 years and believed as Bob Rae – and In the past, there have been a number of members who many others – said, that government was theirs “by di- have risen on different occasions on what I might call vine right.”1 This minority government was a blow to the fictitious points of order or points of privilege. I hope this party. will relieve that situation. It will be my duty to call those members out of order because, in turn, they will have an The Opposition, however, had not really won the elec- opportunity to make their points during members’ tion. They were in the same spot they were in 1975 and statements. 5 1977; they could bring down the government or they could allow the Conservatives to continue to govern. Un- The other two major reforms to the Standing Orders like the Davis minorities, however, Miller’s government also changed the way in which Members conducted had lost the popular vote and held power by the slimmest House business. The first was “Responses to Ministerial of margins. It is not hard to understand why the two Op- Statements.” This new procedure allowed each Opposi- position parties reached an agreement.2 By the beginning tion party up to five minutes to respond to whatever pol- of July, the parties switched sides in the House. The Lib- icy statement the government made on a given day. It erals with help from the NDP moved to the Government allowed the Opposition parties to respond outside de- benches and the Conservatives became the Official bate to the government’s initiatives. Opposition. The final piece made an important change to parlia- These facts are actually less important than they seem mentary tradition. One of the Speaker’s jobs was to select on the surface. Minority governments are notoriously MPPs to speak. In doing so, the Speaker used his discre- unstable and the Liberal/NDP accord only had a shelf life tion with regard to both order of questions and the num- of two years. More important, however, was the cultural ber of supplementary questions each MPP may ask. shift that the new Parliament underwent in those first Although the Leader of the Opposition traditionally gets two years. Interviews with Norm Sterling, the lon- the first questions, it was the Speaker who ultimately gest-serving Progressive Conservative MPP, indicate made that judgment. that the nature of the hung Parliament made sure that the The new Standing Order read: government could not just “forge ahead” with its plans. In exercising his discretion pursuant to standing order In fact, Peterson’s minority government had to negotiate 27(d) to permit supplementary questions, the House rec- with the Opposition parties to make changes to the ommends that the Speaker permit supplementary ques- Standing Orders.3 tions as follows: Many of the changes were “housekeeping” in nature, • Official opposition — one question and two but there were some significant reforms to the way the supplementary questions; House does its business such as: • Official opposition — one question and two supplementary questions; • Ending evening sittings; • Third party — one question and two supplementary • Dedicated time for Private Members’ Business on questions; Thursday morning; • Third party — one question and two supplementary • Responses to Ministerial Statements; questions; • Member’s Statements; • All other questions — one question and one • 4 Order of Oral Questions supplementary question.6 These changes came about as a result of give and take Although the Speaker retained his right to determine between the parties but benefited the Opposition more the order of speakers and the number of supplementary than the Government. All of a sudden, private members questions, the House expressed its desire to have a cer- had time specifically allocated to deal with Private Mem- tain amount of order in its proceedings with this addition ber’s Bills. They were also able to take ninety seconds to to the Standing Orders. address any issue they liked in a ten-minute period called “Member’s Statements.” As the Speaker said on The Hot, Magical Summer of 1987 the first day of use: When David Peterson signed the accord with Bob Rae, Members’ statements give a private member, other than he knew he had two years to show Ontarians what he a party leader or a minister, an opportunity to make a statement of up to 90 seconds with a total time for such could do and what kind of Premier he would be. When statements of 10 minutes. These times will be strictly the accord expired in 1987, Peterson called an election enforced so that all members have an opportunity to and won 95 out of a possible 130 seats. Arguably, this is participate ... when rule changes in the House became more important. The 1987 election started a process whereby the parlia- 34 CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW / AUTUMN 2005 mentarians of the Tory years left the Legislature to be re- House leader — the Conservative Party did; my party placed by rookie MPPs. The 1987 election elected a did — and we said, ‘We’ll accept the entire package from the Legislative Assembly committee,’ which included massive majority for Peterson, many of whom were new reforms for all the rules. The government House leader’s to the process; the 1990 election decimated the Liberals, representative, the chief government whip, negotiated bringing to power the NDP, which had never formed a that with my whip, the member for Oshawa (Mr government; in 1995, the Harris Tories swept to power Breaugh), our representative, and the member for with its own contingent of brand new members. In each Carleton. We had a package. case many members had no sense of the traditions of a They took it to their caucus and their caucus rejected that stable parliament and little understanding of how Parlia- package. They said as a majority at that time: ‘To hell 7 ment is designed to work. with the opposition. We’ll get at the rules by imposing. Although the 1987 election did not start the series of Sean Conway, the Government House Leader, re- rule changes, it was the first Parliament in which massive sponded to Opposition comments on his rule changes by numbers of new members replaced so many long-serv- saying that the Government would get its business done ing ones. With a majority government, the Peterson Lib- and would do so without continuous obstruction from erals had a greater leeway to act in whatever way they the Opposition: chose.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turn Left Virez À Gauche Winter/ Voice of the NDP Socialist Caucus / Voix Du Caucus Socialiste NPD $2 Hiver 2018
    Turn Left Virez à gauche Winter/ Voice of the NDP Socialist Caucus / Voix du caucus socialiste NPD $2 hiver 2018 Make housing a right for everyone in Canada. Now. BY COREY DAVID Average working people, including But this is the direction the NDP must travel the precariously and under-employed, have to more fairly distribute the profits of business nvestment is designed to foster growth in a no financial ability to challenge the deep and investment. The NDP should also company or asset to increase the value of pockets of investors. The problem is not address the issue of speculation and market the investment. In theory, the mobilization fundamentally a shortage; it is the reduction manipulation in order to lead the fight for a of capital could develop key sectors to of a home to the wretched status of a just and equitable society. Istrengthen and diversify our economy. Sadly, commodity, subject to the cold-blooded goal Working people should not be opportunistic individuals play games to of profit maximization. Instead of tolerating robbed of the value they create and should increase their fortune by inflating or grossly this horror show, cities should be the biggest not be extorted for seeking decent housing in devaluing commodities. player in the housing market -- with a mandate the place they call home. To that end, public Short sellers follow short term to meet human needs for decent shelter, set ownership of resources, of land development, trends, buying at the bottom to foster benchmark rates and create new jobs in the the construction industry and basic services is demand.
    [Show full text]
  • It Pays to Persevere
    The best $75 you’ll ever spend in employee recruiting. ovjobs.ca Get your position in front of The Region’s Business Media. More than 3,400 Subscribers. people who are looking for work. www.ovbusiness.com | [email protected] [email protected] | 613-732-7774 Issue No. 233 Published by: Forward Thinking July 3, 2018 It Pays To Persevere Yakabuski’s road to becoming Minister of Transportation By: Jennifer Layman South, and in 1963 he defeated [email protected] Liberal Leonard Quilty by 889 votes. He would hold his seat for For the first time in almost 24 years. In 1987, he chose not three decades, the provincial rid- to seek re-election. He died on ing of Renfrew-Nipissing-Pem- the day of his retirement. broke has a minister in the pro- Second Cousins vincial cabinet. John Yakabuski Just down the road in the rid- kicked off his 15th year as the ing of Renfrew North, a cousin region’s MPP by being appointed of Paul Yakabuski had entered as Minister of Transportation for politics, but as a Liberal candi- Ontario. The last time the region date. Sean Conway started his had a member in cabinet was in political career in 1975, earning 1990 when Sean Conway was a seat away from the Conserva- the Minister of Education and tives who had held it for nearly Colleges and Universities. 20 years. Conway would go The demands on Yakabuski every portfolio, earning him the ki was never a cabinet minister. on to have a 28-year career in will be huge on this file as spe- respect throughout Queen’s Park, John claimed that honour in politics, which would include cial interest groups are already and making sure his riding didn’t the first year his Conservatives cabinet positions as Minister of wanting to get light rails, bicycle feel abandoned by the govern- formed government, after 14 Education in 1985, Minister of lanes and more onto his desk for ment in power, as so often is the years of opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Park Notes
    Queen’s Park notes FOLLOW US @Mobilepk For the week of March 30–April 3, 2015 LIBERALS AND TORIES SPAR OVER DIRECTION OF PROVINCIAL DEFICIT Finance Minister Charles Sousa (Mississauga South) announced the province’s deficit for 2014-15 is $10.9 billion, $1.6 billion below its target of $12.5 billion. Sousa added that these figures confirm that the Liberals are on track to balance the budget by 2017-18. In contrast, Progressive Conservative Finance critic, Vic Fedeli (Nipissing), said that since Kathleen Wynne became Premier two years ago, Ontario’s deficit has increased from $9.2 billion to $10.9 billion. Fedeli disputed Sousa’s claim that Ontario would balance its budget by 2017-18. Fedeli added, “Expert after expert, from the Ontario Chamber of Commerce to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, to the Moody’s and Fitch credit rating agencies to the Auditor have all told the Liberals they must change course. So far, we have no evidence they’re willing to do that.” Meantime, Sousa has yet to announce the date for the Ontario budget. With the announcement that the Federal government’s budget will be presented on April 21, it is expected that the Ontario budget will be announced shortly afterwards. 2014 PUBLIC SECTOR SALARY DISCLOSURE LIST RELEASED For the first time in recent memory, the release of the Public Sector Salary Disclosure (2014) list (Sunshine List) did not dominate the Legislature. In fact, not one question was asked by the opposition parties on the number of public sector employees on the 2014 disclosure list.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Professionalization of the Political Trade in the Ontario Legislature
    From Part-Time Worker to Full-Time Professional: Examining the Professionalization of the Political Trade in the Ontario Legislature Andrea Ernesaks 2012-2013 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP) 1303A Whitney Block Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario, M7A 1A2 [email protected] www.olipinterns.ca Draft version: Please do not cite without the author’s permission Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association 6 June 2013, Victoria, British Columbia Ernesaks 1 Introduction There is an old adage suggesting that one should never openly discuss politics or religion in polite company. The reason for this is simple: two controversial topics of conversation, it has been said, can make for one very awkward social engagement. There is, however, an unfortunate consequence that can occur as a result of being so risk averse: the emergence of a public that knows nothing about its own elected officials. In current day Ontario, few individuals fully understand the real pressures and responsibilities innate to political office. MPPs are tasked with representing their constituencies, completing their legislative duties, confronting the media and towing the party line, all whilst trying to maintain some semblance of a personal life. The majority of an MPP’s political life is spent at Queen’s Park, not in their own home ridings, and maintaining their persona as “the politician” is an almost 24/7 endeavour. On top of all of these responsibilities, MPPs are endlessly scrutinized by the public and the media, who always believe their actions to be suspect and their motives self-serving. This, however, has not always been the case.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of Premier of Ontario 1945-2010: Who Really Advises?
    The Office of Premier of Ontario 1945-2010: Who Really Advises? Patrice Dutil and Peter P. Constantinou This article focuses on the composition of the Ontario Premier’s office and uses an institutionalist approach to put the influence of advisors in context. It looks at expenditures attributed in the Public Accounts to the Premier’s Office and staffing. It assumes that the number of advisors and their placement in the decision-making hierarchy should have a material impact on the quantity and quality of the advice being received by the Premier. Among other things the articles 2013 CanLIIDocs 388 shows that the classic policy/administration divide was not clearly defined in Ontario. Instead it exhibits a back-and-forth habit of experimentation that depended on the personality of the prime minister, the capacities of political and bureaucratic advisors, and the stages of the governmental cycle. There have been discernible cycles in the hiring of political staff and in the growth of expenditures that would indicate the Premier’s Office was more concerned with campaign preparations and externalities than it was in rivaling bureaucratic influence. Compared to Ottawa, where the structures of the Prime Minister’s Office and the Privy Council Office have been far more distinct in this similar time frame, the Ontario experience reveals itself as one of constant experimentation. or almost two generations, observers of all sorts In her study for the Gomery Commission, Liane have almost unanimously lamented the growth in Benoit noted that political staff (or “exempt staff”) Finfluence of prime ministerial advisors. Members played a valuable role in advising Prime Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Germania Club’S 20Th Anniversary
    ) _ Mitchell Sharp, seated at piano above, acting Prime Minister while Prime Minister Trudeau was in Munich, Germany, was guest speaker at the Germania Club’s 20th anniversary. Standing from left: club president Fred Krause, Gus McFarlane, MP for Hamilton Mountain; Lois Hopkins, Erna Krause, MP Len Hopkins, club vice-president Manfred Kirschling, and Eva Kirschling. Mr. Sharp played several German folk selections and everyone joined in for a sing-song. At left, the club’s first president, Martin Bauernschmitt, shows off an elaborate gingerbread house. Mr. Bauernschmitt, a baker by trade, is believed to have created the house. At right, for the club’s 20th anniversary, these distinguished people gathered. From left: MPP Sean Conway, unknown, MP Len Hopkins, club president Fred Krause, unknown, and Pembroke Mayor Henry Brown. ) Page 2 _ Germania Club, Pembroke Presidents: 1955-2005 A half-century of honouring German culture and heritage in the Ottawa Valley, and of service to the wider community Martin Bauernschmitt Werner Schutt Fred Krause Hans Ebrecht 1955 – 1959 1959 – 1960 1960 – 1962 1962 – 1966 1966 – 1982 1982 – 1984 1984 – 1986 1986 – 1988 1988 – 1989 1988 – 1991 Albert Jansen Karl Jaeger Erwin Beck Albert Dermann Heidemarie Galazka 1991 – 1992 1992 – 1993 1993 – 1995 1995 – 1999 2004 – 2005 1999 – 2004 ) Page 3 _ Program 50th Anniversary Gala Germania Hall 15 Bennett Street, Pembroke 6:00 p.m. ................................................ Reception for Dignitaries 6:30 p.m. ................................................ Media Interviews 7:00 p.m. ................................................ Alphorn Introduction of Dignitaries National Anthems of Canada and the Federal Republic of Germany 7:10 p.m. ................................................ Introduction of Dignitaries – Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Turncoats, Opportunists, and Political Whores': Floor Crossers in Ontario
    “‘Turncoats, Opportunists, and Political Whores’: Floor Crossers in Ontario Political History” By Patrick DeRochie 2011-12 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP) 1303A Whitney Block Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 Phone: 416-325-0040 [email protected] www.olipinterns.ca www.facebook.com/olipinterns www.twitter.com/olipinterns Paper presented at the 2012 Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Edmonton, Alberta Friday, June 15th, 2012. Draft: DO NOT CITE 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their support, advice and openness in helping me complete this research paper: Gilles Bisson Sean Conway Steve Gilchrist Henry Jacek Sylvia Jones Rosario Marchese Lynn Morrison Graham Murray David Ramsay Greg Sorbara Lise St-Denis David Warner Graham White 3 INTRODUCTION When the October 2011 Ontario general election saw Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals win a “major minority”, there was speculation at Queen’s Park that a Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) from the Progressive Conservative (PC) Party or New Democratic Party (NDP) would be induced to cross the floor. The Liberals had captured fifty-three of 107 seats; the PCs and NDP, thirty-seven and seventeen, respectively. A Member of one of the opposition parties defecting to join the Liberals would have definitively changed the balance of power in the Legislature. Even with the Speaker coming from the Liberals’ ranks, a floor crossing would give the Liberals a de facto majority and sufficient seats to drive forward their legislative agenda without having to rely on at least one of the opposition parties. A January article in the Toronto Star revealed that the Liberals had quietly made overtures to at least four PC and NDP MPPs since the October election, 1 meaning that a floor crossing was a very real possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Quiz
    Niagara Quiz Try our Niagara Quiz & see how well you know Niagara. Answers and ratings appear at the bottom. 1. Released by Twentieth Century-Fox, Niagara was a 1953 thriller-film noir that introduced Marilyn Monroe in her first major film appearance. Who was her male co-star? A) Joseph Cotten B) Alan Ladd C) Spencer Tracy D) Gene Kelly 2. As a part of the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Welland Canal enables ships to ascend and descend the Niagara Escarpment and to bypass Niagara Falls. How long is the canal? A) 42 km B) 62 km C) 72 km D) 82 km 3. The Regional Municipality of Niagara, also known as the Niagara Region, or colloquially "Regional Niagara", is a regional municipality comprising twelve municipalities of Southern Ontario. Which municipality is not part of Niagara Region? A) Wainfleet B) West Lincoln C) Grimsby D) Pelham 4. Who has not served either as an MP or MPP in Niagara? A) Girve Fretz B) Peter Kormos C) Dean Allison D) Doug Martin 5. Which of the following is not a winery in Niagara? A) Coyote’s Run B) Spotted Cow C) Hillebrand D) Chateau des Charmes 6. How long does it take a ship on average to traverse the entire length of the Welland Canal? A) 2.5 hours B) 5 hours C) 8 hours D) 11 hours 7. The Welland Canal connects Port Weller on Lake Ontario to what other port on Lake Erie? A) Port Arthur B) Port Burwell C) Port Colborne D) Port Hope 8. The Niagara Escarpment’s easternmost point is near A) Watertown, New York B) Buffalo New York C) Rochester, New York D) Medina, New York 9.
    [Show full text]
  • NDP / Bill 40 PC / Bill 7 LIBERAL
    CFLR | CLI RESEARCH Ontario Labour Law Review Processes 1990 to 2017 JUNE 2018 1993 Bill 40 NDP / 1995 PC / Bill 7 2017 LIBERAL/ Bill 148 CFLR | CLI RESEARCH LABOUR LAW REVIEW PROCESSES IN ONTARIO 1990 TO 2017 Contents • Introduction 2 Labour Law 2 Neoliberalism 3 Fighting Back Against Neoliberalism 6 • The NDP Government and Bill 40 8 1990 Election 8 The NDP’s Response to the Economic Crisis 8 Labour Law Reform: Bill 40 9 Responses to the Bill 12 Conclusion 15 • The Progressive Conservative Government and Bill 7 17 1995 Election 17 Anti-Worker Legislation 18 Labour Law Regression: Bill 7 19 Responses to the Bill 22 Conclusion 23 • The Liberal Government and Bill 148 24 2003 Election 24 The Great Recession 24 Resistance to Neoliberalism 25 Labour Law Review 26 Labour Law Reform: Bill 148 32 Responses to the Bill 36 Conclusion 41 • Summary and Next Steps 42 Labour Law Review Processes in Ontario 42 Next Steps 45 1. Strengthen the relationship between trade unions and the FF$15 campaign 45 2. Election and Post-Election Strategy 46 • Bibliography 47 1 CFLR | CLI RESEARCH LABOUR LAW REVIEW PROCESSES IN ONTARIO 1990 TO 2017 Introduction Labour Law Developing and modifying labour laws is contentious, as it pits working people against the business community. Workers want higher wages and improved standards, while business owners do not want governments regulating their power in the workplace. With that in mind, this paper examines labour law review processes in Ontario since 1990. More specifically, this paper will examine: 1. the New Democratic Party’s (NDP) Bill 40 which came into law in 1993; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions Fiscal and Political Federalism in an Era of Change
    Canada: The State of the Federation 2006/07 Transitions Fiscal and Political Federalism in an Era of Change Edited by John R. Allan Thomas J. Courchene Christian Leuprecht Conference organizers: Sean Conway Peter M. Leslie Christian Leuprecht Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University McGill-Queen’s University Press Montreal & Kingston • London • Ithaca SOTF2006/07Prelims 1 9/17/08, 2:32 PM The Institute of Intergovernmental Relations The Institute is the only academic organization in Canada whose mandate is solely to promote research and communication on the challenges facing the federal system. Current research interests include fiscal federalism, health policy, the reform of federal po- litical institutions and the machinery of federal-provincial relations, Canadian federalism and the global economy, and comparative federalism. The Institute pursues these objectives through research conducted by its own staff and other scholars, through its publication program, and through seminars and conferences. The Institute links academics and practitioners of federalism in federal and provincial govern- ments and the private sector. The Institute of Intergovernmental Relations receives ongoing financial support from the J.A. Corry Memorial Endowment Fund, the Royal Bank of Canada Endowment Fund, the Government of Canada, and the governments of Manitoba and Ontario. We are grateful for this support, which enables the Institute to sustain its extensive program of research, publication, and related activities. L’Institut des relations intergouvernementales L’Institut est le seul organisme universitaire canadien à se consacrer exclusivement à la recherche et aux échanges sur les questions du fédéralisme. Les priorités de recherche de l’Institut portent présentement sur le fédéralisme fiscal, la santé, la modification éventuelle des institutions politiques fédérales, les mécanismes de relations fédérales-provinciales, le fédéralisme canadien au regard de l’économie mondiale et le fédéralisme comparatif.
    [Show full text]
  • The Informer
    Winter 2019 Table of Contents Welcome, Former Parliamentarians! We hope you’ve been staying warm. Below is a list of what you’ll find in the latest issue of The InFormer. Our annual holiday social/ 2 In conversation with John O’Toole/ 9 In conversation with Cindy Forster/ 11 In conversation with Sandra Pupatello/ 13 In conversation with Nokomis O’Brien/ 15 In conversation with Catherine Hsu/ 16 The artists who created the art in Queen’s Park/ 19 Political mentors/ 20 Unveiling Speaker Levac’s portrait/ 23 Spotlight on history/ 25 Behind the scenes/ 26 In loving memory of John Roxborough Smith/ 29 At the back of this newsletter, please find attached the 2019 OAFP membership renewal form. 1 Social Our Annual Holiday Social This joyous occasion was held in our newly renovated board room. The fes- tive atmosphere was enhanced with delicious food, refreshing beverages and sparkling conversation. As always, Joe Spina brought some fabulous Italian pastries. It was a great turnout of current and former Members. The gathering of about 60 people included Professors Fanelli and Olinski, two very strong supporters of our Campus Program, former Premier Kathleen Wynne, several newly elected MPPs, Legislative staffs, numerous former Members and our two Interns, Victoria Shariati and Zena Salem. A Special guest was Speaker Arnott.We took the occasion to present Speaker Arnott with the scroll proclaiming him an Honorary Member of O. A. F. P. The warmth of the occasion was wonderful, as you can tell with the photos we have included. All photos by Zena Salem. 2 Social David Warner and Jean-Marc Lalonde OAFP Scroll for Speaker Arnott 3 Social The many food options.
    [Show full text]
  • Tue 3 May 2011 / Mar 3 Mai 2011
    No. 114 No 114 ISSN 1180-2987 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario Second Session, 39th Parliament Deuxième session, 39e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Tuesday 3 May 2011 Mardi 3 mai 2011 Speaker Président Honourable Steve Peters L’honorable Steve Peters Clerk Greffière Deborah Deller Deborah Deller Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Hansard Reporting and Interpretation Services Service du Journal des débats et d’interprétation Room 500, West Wing, Legislative Building Salle 500, aile ouest, Édifice du Parlement 111 Wellesley Street West, Queen’s Park 111, rue Wellesley ouest, Queen’s Park Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Telephone 416-325-7400; fax 416-325-7430 Téléphone, 416-325-7400; télécopieur, 416-325-7430 Published by the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Publié par l’Assemblée législative de l’Ontario 5621 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE OF ONTARIO DE L’ONTARIO Tuesday 3 May 2011 Mardi 3 mai 2011 The House met at 0900.
    [Show full text]