DOCSLIB.ORG

For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet. 45 Lencioni M, Falcone A, Allegrini G, Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet. 45 Lencioni M, Falcone A, Allegrini G, Et Al Further reading for A Burrows and others. Systemic treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: two ends of the therapeutic spectrum. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5: 409–18. 1 Olweny CL, Toya T, Katongole-Mbidde E, et al. Treatment of + VM 26 + 5-fluorouracil with mAMSA + VM 26 + 5-fluorouracil. hepatocellular carcinoma with Adriamycin: preliminary Oncology 1987; 44: 207–09. communication. Cancer 1975; 36: 1250–57. 25 Falkson G, Cnaan A, Simson IW, et al. A randomized phase II study 2 Vogel CL, Bayley AC, Brooker RJ, et al. A phase II study of of acivicin and 4’deoxydoxorubicin in patients with hepatocellular adriamycin (NSC 123127) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma carcinoma in an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. from Zambia and the United States. Cancer 1977; 39: 1923–29. Am J Clin Oncol 1990; 13: 510–15. 3 Johnson PJ, Williams R, Thomas H, et al. Induction of remission in 26 Mok TS, Leung TW, Lee SD, et al. A multi-centre randomized phase hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin. Lancet 1978; 1: II study of nolatrexed versus doxorubicin in treatment of Chinese 1006–09. patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother 4 Falkson G, Moertel CG, Lavin P, et al. Chemotherapy studies in Pharmacol 1999; 44: 307–11. primary liver cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. 27 Ishikawa T, Ichida T, Sugitani S, et al. Improved survival with oral Cancer 1978; 42: 2149–56. administration of enteric-coated tegafur/uracil for advanced stage 5 Olweny CL, Katongole-Mbidde E, Bahendeka S, et al. Further IV-A hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16: experience in treating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in 452–59. Uganda. Cancer 1980; 46: 2717–22. 28 Ravry MJ, Omura GA, Bartolucci AA. Phase II evaluation of 6 Williams R, Melia WM. Liver tumours and their management. cisplatin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and Clin Radiol 1980; 31: 1–11. cholangiocarcinoma: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial. 7 Melia WM, Johnson PJ, Williams R. Induction of remission in Cancer Treat Rep 1984; 68: 1517–18. hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of VP 16 with adriamycin. 29 Falkson CI, Falkson G. A phase II evaluation of clofazimine plus Cancer 1983; 51: 206–10. doxorubicin in advanced, unresectable primary hepatocellular 8 Chlebowski RT, Tong M, Weissman J, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 1999; 57: 232–35. carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic features in North American 30 Baker LH, Saiki JH, Jones SE, et al. Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil patients. Cancer 1984; 53: 2701–06. in the treatment of advanced hepatoma: a Southwest Oncology 9 Choi TK, Lee NW, Wong J. Chemotherapy for advanced Group study. Cancer Treat Rep 1977; 61: 1595–97. hepatocellular carcinoma. Adriamycin versus quadruple 31 Al Idrissi HY, Ibrahim EM, Abdel SA, et al. Primary hepatocellular chemotherapy. Cancer 1984; 53: 401–05. carcinoma in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia: treatment with 10 Falkson G, MacIntyre JM, Schutt AJ, et al. Neocarzinostatin versus combination chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin and m-AMSA or doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol mitomycin-C. Hepatogastroenterology 1985; 32: 8–10. 1984; 2: 581–84. 32 Yang TS, Wang CH, Hsieh RK, et al. Gemcitabine and doxorubicin 11 Falkson G, MacIntyre JM, Moertel CG, et al. Primary liver cancer: for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. Cancer 1984; 54: carcinoma: a phase I-II trial. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1771–78. 970–77. 33 Feun LG, O’Brien C, Molina E, et al. Recombinant leukocyte 12 Colombo M, Tommasini MA, Del Ninno E, et al. Hepatocellular interferon, doxorubicin, and 5FUDR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: report of a clinical trial with intravenous carcinoma: a phase II trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2003; 129: doxorubicin. Liver 1985; 5: 336–41. 17–20. 13 Sciarrino E, Simonetti RG, Le Moli S, Pagliaro L. Adriamycin 34 Morstyn G, Ihde DC, Eddy JL, et al. Combination chemotherapy of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: experience with 109 hepatocellular carcinoma with doxorubicin and streptozotocin. patients. Cancer 1985; 56: 2751–55. Am J Clin Oncol 1983; 6: 547–51. 14 Melia WM, Johnson PJ, Williams R. Controlled clinical trial of 35 Leung TW, Patt YZ, Lau WY, et al. Complete pathological remission doxorubicin and tamoxifen versus doxorubicin alone in is possible with systemic combination chemotherapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep 1987; 71: 1213–16. hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1676–81. 15 Lai CL, Wu PC, Chan GC, et al. Doxorubicin versus no antitumor 36 Leung TW, Tang AM, Zee B, et al. Factors predicting response and therapy in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective survival in 149 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma randomized trial. Cancer 1988; 62: 479–83. treated by combination cisplatin, interferon-alpha, doxorubicin and 16 Johnson PJ, Dobbs N, Kalayci C, et al. Clinical efficacy and toxicity 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Cancer 2002; 94: 421–27. of standard dose adriamycin in hyperbilirubinaemic patients with 37 Kajanti MJ, Pyrhonen SO. Phase II intravenous study of epirubicin hepatocellular carcinoma: relation to liver tests and with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced hepatocellular pharmacokinetic parameters. Br J Cancer 1992; 65: 751–55. carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 1620–22. 17 Halm U, Etzrodt G, Schiefke I, et al. A phase II study of pegylated 38 Boucher E, Corbinais S, Brissot P, Boudjema K, Raoul JL. liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of advanced hepatocellular Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with systemic carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 113–14. chemotherapy combining epirubicin, cisplatinum and infusional 18 Hong RL, Tseng YL. A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of 5-fluorouracil (ECF regimen). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2002; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced 50: 305–08. hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2003; 51: 39 Bobbio-Pallavicini E, Porta C, et al. Epirubicin and etoposide 433–38. combination chemotherapy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma 19 Cheng AL, Yeh KH, Fine RL, et al. Biochemical modulation of patients: a phase II study. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 1784–88. doxorubicin by high-dose tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced 40 Gebbia V, Maiello E, Serravezza G, et al. 5-Fluorouracil plus high hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea for the treatment of 1955–60. primary hepatocellular carcinomas: results of a phase II multicenter 20 Kardinal CG, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, et al. Combined study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (G.O.I.M.). Anticancer doxorubicin and alpha-interferon therapy of advanced Res 1999; 19: 1407–10. hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 1993; 71: 2187–90. 41 Joishy SK, Bennett JM, Balasegaram M, et al. Clinical and 21 Lotz JP, Grange JD, Hannoun L, et al. Treatment of unresectable chemotherapeutic study of hepatocellular carcinoma in Malaysia: a hepatocellular carcinoma with a combination of human comparison with African and American patients. Cancer 1982; 50: recombinant alpha-2b interferon and doxorubicin: results of a pilot 1065–69. study. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 1319–25. 42 Taieb J, Bonyhay L, Golli L, et al. Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for 22 Feun LG, Savaraj N, Hung S, et al. A phase II trial of recombinant patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using two different leukocyte interferon plus doxorubicin in patients with schedules. Cancer 2003; 98: 2664–70. hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1994; 17: 393–95. 43 Ravry MJ, Omura GA, Bartolucci AA, et al. Phase II evaluation of 23 Falkson G, Ryan LM, Johnson LA, et al. A random phase II study of cisplatin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and mitoxantrone and cisplatin in patients with hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial. carcinoma: an ECOG study. Cancer 1987; 60: 2141–45. Cancer Treat Rep 1986; 70: 311–12. 24 Bezwoda WR, Weaving A, Kew M, Derman DP. Combination 44 Okada S, Okazaki N, Nose H, et al. A phase 2 study of cisplatin in chemotherapy of hepatocellular cancer: comparison of adriamycin patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 1993; 50: 22–26. Oncology Vol 5 July 2004 http://image.thelancet.com/extras/03oncl1007webfr.pdf 1 For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet. 45 Lencioni M, Falcone A, Allegrini G, et al. Oral doxifluridine in in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2002; advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II study. Oncology 2000; 94: 3186–91. 59: 204–09. 63 Lin J, Shiu W, Leung WT, et al. Phase II study of high-dose 46 Pazdur R, Moore DF, Bready B, et al. Phase II trial of edatrexate in ifosfamide in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 1994; Pharmacol 1993; 31: 338–39. 5: 646–48. 64 O’Reilly EM, Stuart KE, Sanz-Altamira PM, et al. A phase II study 47 Hochster HS, Green MD, Speyer J, et al. 4' Epidoxorubicin of irinotecan in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. (epirubicin): activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1985; Cancer 2001; 91: 101–05. 3: 1535–40. 65 Falkson G, Coetzer B, Klaassen DJ. A phase II study of m-AMSA in 48 Pohl J, Zuna I, Stremmel W, Rudi J. Systemic chemotherapy with patients with primary liver cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol epirubicin for treatment of advanced or multifocal hepatocellular 1981; 6: 127–29. carcinoma. Chemotherapy 2001; 47: 359–65. 66 Bukowski RM, Legha S, Saiki J, et al. Phase II trial of m-AMSA in 49 Shiu W, Mok SD, Leung N, et al. Phase 2 study of high dose hepatocellular carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. etoposide (VP16-213) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol Cancer Treat Rep 1982; 66: 1651–52. 1987; 17: 113–15. 67 Cheng E, Lightdale C, Young C, et al. Phase II trial of (m-AMSA) 50 Yoshino M, Okazaki N, Yoshida T, et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Capecitabine As a First-Line Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
    British Journal of Cancer (2008) 98, 316 – 322 & 2008 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/08 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com A phase II study of paclitaxel and capecitabine as a first-line combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer Clinical Studies HJ Kang1, HM Chang1, TW Kim1, M-H Ryu1, H-J Sohn1, JH Yook2,STOh2, BS Kim2, J-S Lee1 and Y-K Kang*,1 1 2 Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Paclitaxel and capecitabine, which have distinct mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, have each shown high activity as single agents in gastric cancer. Synergistic interaction between these two drugs was suggested by taxane-induced upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase. We, therefore, evaluated the antitumour activity and toxicities of paclitaxel and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic AGC were treated À2 À2 with capecitabine 825 mg m p.o. twice daily on days 1–14 and paclitaxel 175 mg m i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Between June 2002 and May 2004, 45 patients, of median age 57 years (range ¼ 38–73 years), were treated with the combination of capecitabine and paclitaxel. After a median 6 cycles (range ¼ 1–9 cycles) of chemotherapy, 43 were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 2 patients showed complete response and 20 showed partial response making the overall response rate 48.9% (95% CI ¼ 30.3–63.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison Between Triplet and Doublet Chemotherapy in Improving
    Guo et al. BMC Cancer (2019) 19:1125 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6294-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A comparison between triplet and doublet chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xinjian Guo1, Fuxing Zhao1, Xinfu Ma1, Guoshuang Shen1, Dengfeng Ren1, Fangchao Zheng1,2,3, Feng Du4, Ziyi Wang1, Raees Ahmad1, Xinyue Yuan1, Junhui Zhao1* and Jiuda Zhao1* Abstract Background: Chemotherapy can improve the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, whether triplet chemotherapy can further improve the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with doublet chemotherapy remains controversial. This study reviewed and updated all published and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy, prognosis, and toxicity of triplet chemotherapy with doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: RCTs on first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and all abstracts from the annual meetings of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences up to October 2018 were searched. The primary outcome was overall survival, while the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time to progress (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Results: Our analysis included 23 RCTs involving 4540 patients and 8 types of triplet and doublet chemotherapy regimens, and systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that triplet chemotherapy was superior compared with doublet chemotherapy in terms of improving median OS (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86–0.98; P = 0.02) and PFS (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.97; P = 0.02) and TTP (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86–0.98; P = 0.02) and ORR (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12–1.31; P < 0.0001) among overall populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Recommendations of the Ndac (Oncology and Hematology) Held on 10.12.2011
    1. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NDAC (ONCOLOGY AND HEMATOLOGY) HELD ON 10.12.2011:- The NDAC (Oncology and Hematology) deliberated the proposals on 10.12.2011 and recommended the following:- AGENDA NAME OF DRUG RECOMMENDATIONS NO. Global Clinical Trials Recommended for giving permission for clinical trial subject to condition that trasuzumab naive patient arm should be excluded from the study, as patients cannot be left untreated of trastuzumab therapy / or 1 Afatinib treated with only investigational drug. Patients aged 18 to 65 years should be included in the study. Recommended for giving permission for clinical trial subject to the following conditions:- ICD is very extensive and too technical for the 2 Netupitant/ patient to understand. It should be simplified. Palonosetron Definite statistical tests for the comparison of primary and secondary endpoints should be incorporated in the protocol. Recommended for giving permission for clinical trial subject to the following conditions:- Periodic ophthalmic examination should be performed at every visit as the drug is reported to have ophthalmological side effects in 53 % cases in 3 Crizotinib phase 2 study. Patients aged 18 to 65 years should be included in the protocol. Method for causality assessment by the investigator should be included in the protocol. New Drugs Approved with the condition that structured post marketing trial (Phase 4) should be conducted in 4. Indian population. Report of post marketing trials Crizotinib ongoing in other countries when completed should be submitted. 5. Abiraterone Approved with condition of conducting Post Acetate Marketing trial (Phase IV) in Indian population to monitor the adverse effects. Report of post marketing trials ongoing in other countries when completed should be submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0216288 A1 Chang (43) Pub
    US 20060216288A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0216288 A1 Chang (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 28, 2006 (54) COMBINATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF Publication Classification CANCER (51) Int. Cl. (75) Inventor: David Chang, Calabasas, CA (US) A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) A6II 3/55 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6II 3 L/4545 (2006.01) SESS is 2-C A61K 31/4439 (2006.01) ONE AMGEN CENTERY DRIVE A6II 3/44 (2006.O1 ) THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320-1799 (US) (52) U.S. Cl. ................... 424/143.1: 514/352: 514/210.2: (73) Assignee: Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 514/318: 514/340; 514/217.04 (21) Appl. No.: 11/386,271 (22) Filed: Mar. 21, 2006 (57) ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data This invention is in the field of pharmaceutical agents and (60) Provisional application No. 60/664,381, filed on Mar. specifically relates to compounds, compositions, uses and 22, 2005. methods for treating cancer. Patent Application Publication Sep. 28, 2006 Sheet 1 of 5 US 2006/0216288A1 Figure 1 -- Vehicle X Compound B, 10 mpk 1800 -- Antibody A, 20 ug 1600 Compound B, 10 mpk+ 1400 Antibody A, 20 ug 1200 1000 800 600 p = 0.0003 1/10 1110 1/10 p < 0.0001 v v v v v v V 174. 22 27 32 37 42 47 Time (days) V Antibody A injection Patent Application Publication Sep. 28, 2006 Sheet 2 of 5 US 2006/0216288A1 Figure 2 -- Vehicle 1800 X Compound B, 75 mpk 1600 th- Antibody A, 500 u 1400 dy 9 1200 Compound B, 75 mpk+ Antibody A, 500 ug 1000 800 600 V Antibodyy A, ipp injectionin 400 200 p < 0.0001 st 0.9515 V.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Table 1. Drug Classification Category Name Generic Name
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Thorax e-Table 1. Drug classification Category Name Generic Name Antiplatelets clopidogrel, cilostazol, ticlopidine2, beraprost, beraprost–long acting, complavin Anticoagulants 2,3 dabigatran Statins1,2,3 atorvastatin2, simvastatin, pitavastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, amlodipine/atorvastatin Sodium channel blockers4,5† mexiletine, aprindine, cibenzoline Beta blocker acebutolol2 Class III antiarrhythmic drugs amiodarone1–6 Calcium channel blockers bepridil1, amlodipine/atorvastatin, telmisartan/amlodipine, valsartan/amlodipine, valsartan/cilnidipine, candesartan/amlodipine Angiotensin/converting enzyme enalapril inhibitor2‡ Thiazides trichlormethiazide, hydrochlorothiazide3,5, benzylhydrochlorothiazide/reserpine/carbazochrome, mefruside, telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide, valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide, candesartan/trichlormethiazide, losartan/hydrochlorothiazide NSAIDs diclofenac2, celecoxib, loxoprofen, etodolac, nabumetone, pranoprofen Anti-rheumatics actarit, iguratimod, tofacitinib, penicillamine2–5, leflunomide1,3, sodium aurothiomalate2–6#, bucillamine Leukotriene receptor antagonist2* pranlukast 5-ASA mesalazine, salazosulfapyridine5 Tricyclic antidepressant Imipramine5, cromipramine, maprotiline Antiepileptics valproate, phenytoin2,3,5, ethotoin, carbamazepine2–5, zonisamide Interferon1,2,3
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Factors Influencing Pyrimidine- Antagonist Chemotherapy
    The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2005) 5, 226–243 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1470-269X/05 $30.00 www.nature.com/tpj REVIEW Genetic factors influencing Pyrimidine- antagonist chemotherapy JG Maring1 ABSTRACT 2 Pyrimidine antagonists, for example, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cytarabine (ara-C) HJM Groen and gemcitabine (dFdC), are widely used in chemotherapy regimes for 2 FM Wachters colorectal, breast, head and neck, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic DRA Uges3 cancer and leukaemias. Extensive metabolism is a prerequisite for conversion EGE de Vries4 of these pyrimidine prodrugs into active compounds. Interindividual variation in the activity of metabolising enzymes can affect the extent of 1Department of Pharmacy, Diaconessen Hospital prodrug activation and, as a result, act on the efficacy of chemotherapy Meppel & Bethesda Hospital Hoogeveen, Meppel, treatment. Genetic factors at least partly explain interindividual variation in 2 The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary antitumour efficacy and toxicity of pyrimidine antagonists. In this review, Diseases, University of Groningen & University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The proteins relevant for the efficacy and toxicity of pyrimidine antagonists will Netherlands; 3Department of Pharmacy, be summarised. In addition, the role of germline polymorphisms, tumour- University of Groningen & University Medical specific somatic mutations and protein expression levels in the metabolic Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; pathways and clinical pharmacology
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Concentrations in Cell Culture Compartments (C5) – Free Concentrations
    Kisitu et al.: Chemical Concentrations in Cell Culture Compartments (C5) – Free Concentrations Supplementary Data1 Table of contents Box S1: Concentrations then and now………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Derivation of the “extracellular biokinetics” formula…………………………………………………………………... 2 Box S2: Example use of Equation S13 with an acidic and basic drug……………………………………………… 7 Table S1: Cell composition data essential for biokinetics calculations…………………………………………….. 7 Table S2: Measured and predicted human plasma fu values………………………………………………………. 8 References………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Box S1: Concentrations then and now Dose: The concept of dose has been defined extensively before (Kisitu et al., 2019). It describes an absolute amount per experimental system (e.g., per mouse or per human patient). When the concept is applied to NAM, it describes the amount of chemical per cell culture well. Example, if a chemical concentration in the medium is 1 mM and the well contains 1 mL of medium, then the dose is 1 µmole; if the same well contains 2 mL medium, then the concentration is the same, but the dose doubles. Weight-normalized doses: Already in Paracelsus’ time it must have been clear that a dose tolerated by a tall and heavy adult may be lethal to a small child. This made clear that normalization to overall weight or volume is an important concept. Often normalized doses are expressed in dose per kg body weight (see Kisitu et al., 2019). Nominal concentration: If a dose in an in vitro system is normalized to the volume of the system, then a nominal concentration is obtained. This measure indicates what the drug/toxicant concentration would be if all chemical was freely dissolved and no losses/distribution occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • HHS Public Access Author Manuscript
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMed Res Author Manuscript Rev. Author manuscript; Author Manuscript available in PMC 2017 January 01. Published in final edited form as: Med Res Rev. 2016 January ; 36(1): 32–91. doi:10.1002/med.21377. Strategies for the Optimization of Natural Leads to Anticancer Drugs or Drug Candidates Zhiyan Xiao1,2,*, Susan L. Morris-Natschke3, and Kuo-Hsiung Lee3,4,* 1Beijing Key Laboratory of Active Substance Discovery and Druggability Evaluation, Institute of Materia Medica, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100050, China 2State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functions of Natural Medicines, Institute of Materia Medica, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100050, China 3Natural Products Research Laboratories, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7568, USA 4Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan Abstract Natural products have made significant contribution to cancer chemotherapy over the past decades and remain an indispensable source of molecular and mechanistic diversity for anticancer drug discovery. More often than not, natural products may serve as leads for further drug development rather than as effective anticancer drugs by themselves. Generally, optimization of natural leads into anticancer drugs or drug candidates should not only address drug efficacy, but also improve ADMET profiles and chemical accessibility associated with the natural leads. Optimization strategies involve direct chemical manipulation of functional groups, structure-activity relationship-directed optimization and pharmacophore-oriented molecular design based on the natural templates.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0092583 A1 Shanahan-Prendergast (43) Pub
    US 20040092583A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0092583 A1 Shanahan-Prendergast (43) Pub. Date: May 13, 2004 (54) TREATMENT FOR INHIBITING (30) Foreign Application Priority Data NEOPLASTICLESIONS Jan. 2, 2001 (IE)........................................ S2001/0002 (76) Inventor: Elizabeth Shanahan-Prendergast, O O O O County Kildare (IE) Publication Classification Correspondence Address: (51) Int. Cl.7 ..................... A61K 31/343; A.k'S HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP 6900 JERICHO TURNPIKE (52) U.S. Cl. ........................... 514/469; 514/475; 514/762 SYOSSET, NY 11791 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 10/250,535 The invention discloses the use of incensole and/or furan ogermacrens, derivatives metabolites and precursors thereof in the treatment of neoplasia, particularly resistant neoplasia (22) PCT Filed: Jan. 2, 2002 and immunodysregulatory disorders. These compounds can be administered alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic, anti-rival, anti-parasite agents, radiation (86) PCT No.: PCT/IE02/00001 and/or Surgery. US 2004/0092583 A1 May 13, 2004 TREATMENT FOR INHIBITING NEOPLASTIC 0007 Chemotherapy uses poison drugs that take advan LESIONS tage of cancer cells rapid growth and consumption of large amounts of nutrients. Chemotherapy side effects include 0001. The present invention relates to a method for the nausea and temporary full or partial hair loss. Antimetabo Selective inhibition of neoplastic cells, for example for the lites, one group of these drugs, work by mimicking the treatment, inhibition or prevention of precancerous lesions, nutrients the body's cells consume. Physicians inject these tumours, cancer growth or other neoplasias in mammals. drugs into the bloodstream, where they travel throughout the This invention also relates to the use of the compounds of body, consumed by every cell.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of Specific Inhibitors for Human Carboxylesterases Or Arylacetamide
    Screening of Specific Inhibitors for Human Carboxylesterases or Arylacetamide Deacetylase Mai Shimizu, Tatsuki Fukami, Miki Nakajima, and Tsuyoshi Yokoi Drug Metab Dispos Supplemental Table 1. Chemicals used in this study. Alfa Aesar (Tokyo, Japan) 3-(4-Fluorobenzoyl) propiponic Acid, 3-Methylflavone-8-carboxylic acid BD Gentest (Woburn, MA) a25-Hydroxycholesterol, b4'-Hydroxydiclofenac, b5-Hydroxydiclofenac Biomol international (Plymouth Meeting, PA) Pizotifen malate Merk (Darmstadt, Germany) Mevastatin, Resveratrol Carbosynthe (Berkshire, UK) N-Acetyl-l-cysteine, Adefovir, 5,6-Dichlorobenzimidazole 1-β-d-Riboburanoside, Indiplon, Milnacipran hydrochloride, Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-arachidonoyl amide, JW480 Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan) N-Cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid, 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, Ethylene glycol-bis (β-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid Enzo Life Science (Farmingdale, NY) Castanospermine, Pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrate Fujicco (Kobe, Japan) Daidzein Funakoshi (Tokyo, Japan) Blasticidin S hydrochloride, Chloroquine, Coumarin, Diethyldithiocarbamate, 7-Ethoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl) coumarin, Furafylline, G-418 sulfate, Ketoconazole, MelQ, l-α-Phosphatidyl choline dilauroyl, Potassium ferricyanide, SKF-525A, Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate, WST-1 Life Technologies (Catlsbad, CA) Cadmium Chloride LKT Laboratories (St. Paul, MN) Bestatin hydrochloride, Capecitabine, Clotrimazole, Doxifluridine, Enalaprilat, Ezetimibe, Ftorafur, Indole-3-carbinol,
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil Versus Oral Doxifluridine As Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trials
    Jpn J Clin Oncol 2001;31(1)25–29 Intravenous 5-Fluorouracil Versus Oral Doxifluridine as Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trials Nam Kyu Kim1, Jin Sik Min1,JeaKunPark1,SeongHyunYun1,JinSilSung2,HyunChulJung3 and Jae Kyung Roh3 Departments of 1Surgery, 2Radiation Oncology and 3Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Received August 14, 2000; accepted November 6, 2000 Background: Preoperative radiation treatment with concomitant intravenous infusion of 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) is known to be effective in shrinking and downstaging of tumors. However, chemotherapy has often been limited by its toxicity and poor patient compliance. Oral 5-FU is known to have several advantages over conventional intravenous 5-FU infusion such as lower toxicity and higher quality of life without compromising the efficacy of the treatment. The aim of this study was to compare intravenous 5-FU with oral doxifluridine with respect to tumor response, toxicity and quality of life. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with rectal cancer, staged as over T3N1 or T4 by transrectal ultrasonography between July 1997 and December 1998, were included in this study. Intravenous 5-FU (450 mg/m2) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2) were given for five consecutive days during the first and fifth weeks of radiation therapy (50.4 Gy) (n = 14). Oral doxifluridine (700 mg/m2/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2) were given daily during radiation treatment (n = 14). Quality of life was scored according to 22 activity items (good, >77; fair, >58; poor, <57). Surgical resection was performed 4 weeks after completion of concurrent chemoradiation treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No .: US 10,945,990 B2 Matsui Et Al
    USO10945990B2 ( 12 ) United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No .: US 10,945,990 B2 Matsui et al . ( 45 ) Date of Patent : Mar. 16 , 2021 ( 54 ) COMBINATION OF A PD - 1 ANTAGONIST 7,521,051 B2 4/2009 Collins et al . AND ERIBULIN FOR TREATING CANCER 7,982,060 B2 7/2011 Austad et al . 8,008,449 B2 8/2011 Korman et al . 8,093,410 B2 1/2012 Chase et al . ( 71 ) Applicants :MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP ., 8,168,757 B2 5/2012 Finnefrock et al . Rahway, NJ ( US ); Eisai R & D 8,350,067 B2 1/2013 Endo et al . Management Co. , Ltd. , Tokyo ( JP ) 8,354,509 B2 1/2013 Carven et al . 8,383,796 B2 2/2013 Korman et al . ( 72 ) Inventors : Junji Matsui , Tsukuba ( JP ) ; Gursel 2011/0271358 Al 11/2011 Freeman et al . Aktan , North Wales, PA ( US ) ; Vassiliki 2015/0246033 A1 * 9/2015 Flynn A61K 31/4709 Karantza , Rahway, NJ (US ) ; RuiRong 424 / 133.1 Yuan , Fort Lee , NJ (US ); Yasuhiro FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Funahashi , Tsukuba ( JP ) ; Erhan Berrak , River Vale , NJ (US ) CN 103562406 A 2/2014 JP 2002-518384 A 6/2002 JP 2006-340714 A 12/2006 ( 73 ) Assignees : EISAI R & D MANAGEMENT CO . , WO WO - 2004 / 004771 A1 1/2004 LTD ., Tokyo ( JP ) ; MERCK SHARP & WO WO - 2004 / 056875 A1 7/2004 DOHME CORP ., Rahway , NJ ( US ) WO WO - 2004 / 072286 A1 8/2004 WO WO - 2007 / 061874 A2 5/2007 ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer , the term of this WO WO - 2008 / 156712 A1 12/2008 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO - 2010 / 027827 A2 3/2010 WO WO - 2010 / 077634 Al 7/2010 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]