Hunter Farm Gathering Place Project Moving Towards Late August Build
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thornton Creek Watershed
Thornton Creek Watershed The Thornton Creek Watershed carries stormwater from over 11.6 miles of North Seattle and Shoreline. The creek’s main channels extend more than 15 miles and run through over 700 backyards. The creek has historically been home to five different species of salmon as well as coyotes, river otters, beavers, and birds such as eagles, owls, and herons. The creek also provides habitat for many smaller creatures like amphibians, reptiles, and insects. Olympic Hills Cedar Park Northgate Hazel Wolf John Rogers Olympic View Sacajawea Licton Springs Wedgewood Cascadia Thornton Creek Water Thornton Creek Decatur Quality Channel Issue #: [Date] Dolor Sit Amet Place Histories: ThorntonHistories: Creek Water Quality Channel & Northeast SeattleThe area along Thornton Creek has been stewarded since time immemorial by the Duwamish and other Puget Sound Salish peoples. At one point, the location of the Thornton Creek Water Quality Channel was known as “Bald Head” by the Duwamish Tribe, describing the bowl-shaped marshy swale that once filled the area around Northgate Mall and North Seattle College. Bald Head was a place to collect resources such as highbush cranberries and marsh tea indicating a much different, more effective water drainage system than seen today. As the city grew, residents began to build homes and farms in the Northgate area. Over time much of Thornton Creek and its tributaries were diverted into pipes. Northgate Mall was built in 1950 and the south fork of Thornton Creek was diverted into a 5 foot wide pipe buried 20 feet below a parking lot. In 2003, a group of diverse stakeholders (such as community, environmental, and business advocates) developed a plan to meet the needs of the growing community. -
2020 Q2 Library Levy Report
Q2|2020 The Seattle Public Library LEVY REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Centering equity, expanding virtual services and confronting new financial realities The Library levy measure approved by Seattle voters in August 2019 provided a clear framework for how the public investment would be used to restore, maintain and improve Library services. This report, which covers activities and spending for the second quarter of 2020, continues the series of updates for the Library Board of Trustees and the public established with the 2012 levy to document implementation of levy priorities and accomplishments. Last August, Seattle voters overwhelmingly approved a seven-year, $219.1 million property tax increase to maintain and enhance Library services from 2020 through 2026. Enhancements include: additional Library hours; elimination of overdue fines; improved collections; more investment in technology; safer, cleaner buildings; and additional programming and services for children and high-needs communities. Many of these enhancements came out of priorities identified through a 2018 community survey that assessed public satisfaction with existing Library programs and services and gauged interest in potential new service offerings. More than 26,000 Seattle residents responded to this survey. At the beginning of 2020, we fulfilled two key voter promises: Eliminating overdue fines and adding an hour of Library service at each location on Sunday. By March, however, the Library was forced to make an unprecedented pivot in response to the global pandemic. Working closely with the city to make decisions, we closed all Library facilities on March 13. At the end of the second quarter, the Library’s physical locations remained closed (except for restroom services provided at five locations). -
The Seattle Public Library 2010 Annual Report
Partnerships Summer Reading Program Digital collection Read Text a Librarian Strategic Plan Center for the Book Washington Online catalog Patrons Budget challenges SPL Mobile App Children Library Materials Budget Global Reading Challenge Reduced hours RRServices eporteport toto thethe CommunityCommunity Teens Literacy Capital improvements 20102010 Programs & classes Programs Green initiatives Social networking Hildreth Seattle Reads Books Blueprint for the Library’s future Strategic Plan SPL Mobile Text A Librarian Budget cuts New mission statement Anonymous donor Dear friends, A large focus of 2010 was developing a new Strategic Plan – the blueprint for the Library’s future! Residents were invited to participate through open houses, citywide forums, focus groups and a survey that was completed by nearly 33,000 people! Our new mission statement, “The Seattle Public Library brings people, information and ideas together to enrich lives and build community,” is the inspiration for why we open our doors every day. Budget cuts were a major concern with continued reduced city revenue and competing demands for limited funds. A $1.7 million cut to the Library budget resulted in severe reductions to branch hours and the collection, a week-long shutdown of the entire Library system and the elimination of staff positions. We also increased fnes and fees. An anonymous donor – who read about our budget situation – pledged $500,000 if it could be matched by community contributions. The additional $500,000 was raised by year’s end, thanks to the generosity of the people of Seattle! Despite continued challenges, the Library remains committed to providing exceptional service. We added a Text A Librarian service and developed a mobile app called “SPL Mobile” to better serve patrons on the go. -
Student Mandatory Forms / Required Documents
PRINT CHILD’S NAME ROOM # 2015–2016 Student Mandatory Forms / Required Documents PLEASE NOTE: This is an STUDENT FORMS: interactive PDF that you can fill out on your computer using THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED FORMS THAT MUST BE COMPLETED FOR Adobe Reader. Duplicate fields EACH STUDENT AND RETURNED WITHIN THE FIRST WEEK OF SCHOOL: will fill in automatically to save you time. Please PRINT and SIGN each page. No forms will o Student Information Verification/Data Sheet be accepted via e-mail. We still This TWO-SIDED data sheet from the school district is stapled to the front of the need paper forms, with a legal manila first day packet envelope. Please review both front and back. Cross out signature, for filing in the office. any incorrect information and write in current information. Medical information is not collected here so this does not need to be added. (Also stapled to the Important: Please print these envelope is your student’s Source Registration letter; keep this for reference forms single-sided, unless the since you may need this to log in to the Source for your student’s info.) form is two-sided. If unable to print forms, please email Cindy o FERPA Release Form at [email protected]. Seattle Schools requires that this is the only form that can be used to opt your A hard copy will be sent home. child out for directory release information. By law, this includes yearbook. o Emergency Information and Student Release Form o Student Health Information Form PLEASE NOTE: You can print this form double-sided. -
Matthews Beach Restoration Project Proposal
Matthews Beach Restoration Project Proposal Compiled by Rebecca Deehr, Derek Beauchemin, Liz Thorsenson, J. Katie Barndt, Jennifer Habetler, Doug Schmitt, Nathan Sakes, Lena Jones, and Suzy Karl EHUF 480, Landscape Plant Selection and Management University of Washington Autumn 2001 Page 1 INTRODUCTION A successful restoration project requires balancing the needs of the group responsible for the restoration with those of the general public. At the Matthews Beach restoration site, the public is composed of several different groups including homeowners in the surrounding area and other visitors who may come from farther away to access the park. To address the concerns of all parties, we determined the following goals: · Provide or improve wildlife habitat and use native plants per the Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation’s Urban Wildlife and Habitat Management Plan · Preserve the basic functionality of the restoration site (i.e., keep the overall design, with its previous goals intact) · Increase the functionality of the stream as a salmon nursery · Provide access to the waterfront for the public · Take the restoration project to “the next level” by dealing with problems that have arisen, and providing a long-term maintenance plan · Provide education about restoration, native plants, fish & wildlife habitat and ecosystem health · Preserve views where possible To achieve these goals we concentrated on six areas. Our focus for this project has been primarily on the areas west of the small creek and main pond. The remainder of the site has more mature vegetation, and the only recommendation we are making at this time is the removal of invasive plants. -
An Analysis of Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing Incentives in Seattle’S Chinatown - International District
An Analysis of Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing Incentives in Seattle’s Chinatown - International District Brian P. Kalthoff A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning University of Washington 2012 Committee: Daniel Abramson George Rolfe Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Urban Planning University of Washington Abstract An Analysis of Historic Preservation and Affordable Housing Incentives in Seattle’s Chinatown - International District Brian Kalthoff 2012 Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Daniel Abramson Department of Urban Planning This thesis investigates the financial, social and the objectives of the current owners. Attention is given to political impacts of the historic preservation and affordable the ownership structure of the subject buildings, with a housing incentives that are available to historically significant particular focus on Chinese family associations. buildings in the Chinatown - International District of Seattle. This paper includes a detailed account of the The research aims to provide insight as to the effectiveness neighborhood’s complex social and political history, as of these incentives in achieving the goal of rehabilitating well as a study of the evolution of its built form, as these buildings and providing affordable housing, while meeting continue to influence the neighborhood today. The research was informed by a review of primary and secondary source material and by a series of confidential interviews with neighborhood property owners, city of Seattle employees, housing developers and a variety of community stakeholders. One significant finding is that many incentives are undesirable to individual property owners, Chinese family associations and other forms of collective ownership entities. -
Thornton Creek Restoration: Baseline Project Effectiveness Monitoring, 2012-2013
Thornton Creek Restoration: Baseline Project Effectiveness Monitoring, 2012-2013 Sarah A. Morley, Jason E. Hall, Josh Chamberlin, and Karrie M. Hanson Technical report by Watershed Program, Fish Ecology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle WA 98112 for Seattle Public Utilities Department City of Seattle 700 5th Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle WA 98104 Agreement No. DA2012-23 June 2013 ii Executive Summary Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) is preparing to construct two urban floodplain reconnection projects in the Thornton Creek watershed of northeast Seattle in 2014. To evaluate project performance, the utility contracted with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to collect pre-project physical and biological baseline data from 2005 to 2009. In 2012, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was brought in by SPU to collect additional biological baseline data and to develop a post-project monitoring plan that includes evaluation of new hyporheic design elements. Data collection by NOAA has been identical to previous USFWS monitoring for periphyton, benthic invertebrates, and fish density. Sampling in 2012 differed from earlier years by focusing less on physical habitat, expanding upon fish-movement surveys, and adding collection of invertebrate drift and fish diet samples. This report summarizes data collected by NOAA during 2012-2013 and provides updates on existing pre-project monitoring results collected by USFWS from 2006 to 2009. The overall biological health of Thornton Creek is poor: scores for the benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) range from poor to very poor and diatom assemblages are composed of a relatively high proportion of species tolerant of nutrient enrichment. -
An Investigation of the Potential for Side Sewer Infiltration to Local Freshwater Systems
An Investigation of the Potential for Side Sewer Infiltration to Local Freshwater Systems Thornton Creek, Seattle WA: A Case Study Angelique B. Hockett A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Urban Planning University of Washington 2016 Committee: Marina Alberti Jan Whittington Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Urban Design and Planning © Copyright 2016 Angelique B. Hockett ii University of Washington Abstract An Investigation of the Potential for Side Sewer Infiltration to Local Freshwater Systems Thornton Creek, Seattle WA: A Case Study Angelique B. Hockett Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Marina Alberti As the wastewater infrastructure throughout our urbanized land continues to age, pipe failures leading to sanitary backups and contamination of the surrounding areas will become more frequent. Most private side sewers throughout the United States have life expectancies of less than 100 years and are swiftly reaching the end of their design life. It is necessary for municipalities to understand the scope of potential private side sewer failure that may be occurring now or in the near future within their jurisdiction in order to properly plan prevention and mitigation. This research explores Thornton Creek, a stream system located in the northeastern corner of Seattle, Washington that has been impacted by fecal contamination. The City of Seattle has yet to identify the primary source of this pollution, but it is hypothesized that it may be partially caused by failing side sewer systems throughout the watershed. In Seattle side sewers are privately owned, hindering the city’s ability to collect adequate information about their conditions. -
On Norway's Roads Less Traveled
(Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Taste of Norway Arts Food with a « Alt nytt begynner med kaos. » Power and sense of place – Mosse Jørgensen The Wave Read more on page 8 Read more on page 15 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 127 No. 14 April 15, 2016 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $2.00 per copy On Norway’s roads less traveled NAW’s new travel series asks the experts—Norway’s diplomats—for recommendations on their home country’s little- known marvels Photos: (above) Kristin Folsland Olsen / Visitnorway.com, (right) Ambassador Kåre Aas Above: Dogsledding is a good way to get out into the stunning Arctic scenery on display in Svalbard—but sometimes the dogs need to stop and play. Right: Spitsbergen is far from everywhere, even the rest of Norway! Located halfway between the Norwegian mainland and the North Pole, the largest island of the Svalbard archipelago is home to a few thousand researchers and other inhabitants who live and work in a laid-back community. Story on page 9 What’s inside? News 2-3 Journalistic legend Søyland to get book Business 4 Sports 5 VICTORIA HOFMO ing on a book that will fill in the facts and give did so for close to four decades. In 1940 he be- Opinion 6-7 Brooklyn, N.Y. flesh to this important Norwegian American. came the paper’s editor-in-chief and remained First, a little about the man. He was born in that position for more than 20 years. -
City of Shoreline Stream and Wetland Inventory and Assessment Appendices
City of Shoreline Stream and Wetland Inventory and Assessment Appendices May 2004 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-1027 Stream and Wetland Inventory and Assessment Appendices May 2004 Prepared for: City of Shoreline Shoreline, WA Prepared by: Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1027 (206) 443-5300 Project #3320005 Stream and Wetland Inventory and Assessment Appendices TABLE OF CONTENTS Title . Appendices A. Stream Inventory and Assessment B. Wetland Inventory and Classification C. Fish Utilization in City of Shoreline Streams D. Public Involvement E. Birds of Shoreview Park F. Hydraulic Project Approval – Stormwater Maintenance G. ESA Species List Confirmation H. Restoration Standard Details I. Washington State Species of Concern J. Washington State Priority Habitats and Species i APPENDIX A. STREAM INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT City of Shoreline Stream Inventory and Assessment May 2004 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-1027 City of Shoreline Stream Inventory and Assessment May 2004 Prepared for: City of Shoreline Shoreline, WA Prepared by: Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1917 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1027 (206) 443-5300 Project #2090051 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents..........................................................................i List of Tables ..............................................................................iii List of Figures.............................................................................iii 1. Introduction .........................................................................1 -
Housing Choice Voucher Program
Housing Choice Voucher Program Seattle Neighborhood Guide 190 Queen Anne Ave N Seattle, WA 98109 206.239.1728 1.800.833.6388 (TDD) www.seattlehousing.org Table of Contents Introduction Introduction ..……………………………………………………. 1 Seattle is made up of many neighborhoods that offer a variety Icon Key & Walk, Bike and Transit Score Key .……. 1 of features and characteristics. The Housing Choice Voucher Crime Rating ……………………………………………………… 1 Program’s goal is to offer you and your family the choice to Seattle Map ………………………………………………………. 2 move into a neighborhood that will provide opportunities for Broadview/Bitter Lake/Northgate/Lake City …….. 3 stability and self-sufficiency. This voucher can open the door Ballard/Greenwood ………………………………………….. 5 for you to move into a neighborhood that you may not have Fremont/Wallingford/Green Lake …………………….. 6 been able to afford before. Ravenna/University District ………………………………. 7 Magnolia/Interbay/Queen Anne ………………………. 9 The Seattle Neighborhood Guide provides information and South Lake Union/Eastlake/Montlake …………….… 10 guidance to families that are interested in moving to a Capitol Hill/First Hill ………………………………………….. 11 neighborhood that may offer a broader selection of schools Central District/Yesler Terrace/Int’l District ………. 12 and more opportunities for employment. Within the Madison Valley/Madrona/Leschi ……………………... 13 Neighborhood Guide, you will find information about schools, Belltown/Downtown/Pioneer Square ………………. 14 parks, libraries, transportation and community services. Mount Baker/Columbia City/Seward Park ………… 15 While the guide provides great information, it is not Industrial District/Georgetown/Beacon Hill ……… 16 exhaustive. Learn more about your potential neighborhood Rainier Beach/Rainier Valley …………………………….. 17 by visiting the area and researching online. Delridge/South Park/West Seattle .…………………… 19 Community Resources ……………….……………………. -
Public Art Roadmap
Seattle’s Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs - 4 - Public Art Roadmap Step-by-Step This section lists common steps on the road to creating a visual public artwork for your neighborhood. The steps are listed in orderhowever your group may need to create additional steps or change their order, depending on the characteristics of your particular project. There is no single formula for developing public art projects. Step 1 - Form a working group (Page 5) Forming a group to work on your project. Step 2 - Define and plan the project (Page 7) Creating a project idea, work plan, timeline and budget. Step 3 – Get legal status and insurance (Page 14) An overview of the legal status and commercial general liability coverage required for public art projects. Step 4 – Raise money (Page 17) Descriptions of ways to raise money through grants and/or fundraising in the neighborhood. Step 5 – Find an artist (Page 20) Creating a Call for Artists and running an artist selection process. Step 6 – Working with the artist (Page 25) Writing a contract and working with the artist through the installation of the artwork. Step 7 – Permits and agency reviews (Page 29) Permits and reviews required by the City of Seattle for public art projects. Step 8 – Develop a maintenance plan (Page 36) An overview on developing a long-term plan for maintaining the artwork. Step 9 – Build the project (Page 38) Basic issues to consider in the fabrication and installation phases of the artwork. Step 10 – Celebrate (Page 39) Celebrate the completion of the artwork by holding a ceremony.