Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis MASTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis „Legal and Political Aspects of the Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute between The United States of America and Canada“ verfasst von / submitted by Mykhaylo Palahitskyy, BA BA angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2016 / Vienna 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 805 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Globalgeschichte und Global Studies degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Edelmayer, MAS Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor Professor Dr. Friedrich Edelmayer for guiding and supporting me over the years. Special thanks go to my parents, friends and fellow graduate students who constantly encouraged and motivated me. 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 7 2. THE LAW OF THE SEA ................................................................................................ 10 2.1. Division of the Ocean ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2. USA and UNCLOS .......................................................................................................... 16 3. NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE BEAUFORT SEA ............................................... 18 4. HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF THE BEAUFORT MARITIME DISPUTE ...... 22 5. RELEVANT UNRESOLVED DISPUTES IN THE ARCTIC .................................... 30 6. NATIONAL ARCTIC STRATEGIES ........................................................................... 40 6.1. Canada’s Arctic Strategy ................................................................................................ 40 6.2. United States of America’s Arctic Strategy ................................................................... 45 6.3. Policies to resolve the Beaufort Sea boundary dispute ................................................. 49 6.3.1. United States of America‘s current position............................................................... 49 6.3.2. Canada‘s current position ........................................................................................... 51 7. RELEVANT FACTORS IN THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCESS ................ 53 7.1. Role of the indigenous population in the dispute settlement process .......................... 58 7.2. Relevance of Geography .................................................................................................. 63 7.3. Relevance of Climate Change in the Arctic ................................................................... 67 7.4. Intergovernmental cooperation in the Arctic ................................................................ 71 8. FUTURE SCENARIOS ................................................................................................... 77 9. CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 84 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 86 3 Abstract This Master Thesis analyzes the Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute between the United States of America and Canada that has remained unresolved for many years. Canada claims the maritime boundary to be along the 141st meridian west out to a distance of 370 km, following the Alaska-Yukon land border. On the contrary, the position of the United States is that the boundary line is perpendicular to the coast out to a distance of 370 km, following a line of equidistance from the coast. This difference creates a wedge with an area of about 21,000 km2 that is claimed by both nations and contains a great amount of natural resources. The objective of this paper is to examine the legal and political aspects of the dispute, the strategies of both disputing parties and the future scenarios of a possible evolution of the dispute. The guiding research question targets the evolution of the dispute and the efforts of the USA and Canada to resolve it. This master thesis familiarizes the reader with relevant aspects of the law of the sea. Further, the integration of the two neighboring countries into the global legal regime established by the law of the sea will be explored to deepen the understanding of the dispute. Since the Beaufort Sea is a part of the Arctic region, the Arctic engagement of both countries will be analyzed along with other interlinked border disputes between Canada and the USA. Finally, this paper identifies the contributing and complicating factors in the dispute settlement process and evaluates the spheres of possible cooperation in the Beaufort Sea despite the boundary dispute. This thesis contains an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the dispute. This paper is written from a point of view of an uninvolved third-party and remains neutral by taking an unengaged position while exploring the dispute. It is hoped that this unengaged position may reveal new perspectives on the conflict and its eventual resolution. 4 Abstrakt Die vorliegende Masterarbeit analysiert den Grenzstreit zwischen den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und Kanada in der Beaufortsee, der seit vielen Jahren ungelöst bleibt. Kanada beansprucht die Seegrenze entlang des 141. westlichen Meridians bis zu einer Entfernung von 370 km nach der Alaska-Yukon Landgrenze. Im Gegensatz dazu ist die Position der Vereinigten Staaten, dass die Grenzlinie bis zu einer Entfernung von 370 km perpendikulär zur Küste nach dem Prinzip der Äquidistanz verläuft. Dieser Unterschied erzeugt einen Keil mit einer Fläche von etwa 21.000 km2, die von beiden Staaten beansprucht wird und eine große Menge von Rohstoffen lagert. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die rechtlichen und politischen Aspekte des Konflikts zu analysieren, die Strategien der beiden streitenden Parteien darzustellen und künftige Szenarien einer möglichen Weiterentwicklung des Grenzstreits zu prüfen. Die Hauptforschungsfrage zielt auf die Entwicklung des Grenzstreits und die Bemühungen der USA und Kanada ihren Streit zu lösen. Diese Masterarbeit versucht die Leserinnen und Leser mit den relevanten Aspekten des Seerechts vertraut zu machen. Um ein tieferes Verständnis über den Grenzstreit zu vermitteln, wird die Integration der beiden Nachbarländer in das globale Rechtssystem analysiert, das auf dem aktuellen Seerecht basiert. Da die Beaufortsee ein Teil der arktischen Region ist, wird die Teilnahme beider Länder an den internationalen Angelegenheiten der Arktis untersucht und die anderen verwandten Grenzstreitigkeiten zwischen Kanada und den USA dargestellt. Schließlich werden die beitragenden und erschwerenden Faktoren im Konfliktlösungsprozess präsentiert und mögliche Bereiche der weiteren Zusammenarbeit in der Beaufortsee trotz des Grenzstreites vorgeschlagen. Diese Masterarbeit verfolgt einen interdisziplinären Ansatz und wurde aus einer unbeteiligten und neutralen Sicht geschrieben. Es wird gehofft, dass die neutrale Position bei der Konfliktforschung neue Perspektiven und auf den Grenzschreit in der Beaufortsee bringen und zur eventuellen Konfliktlösung beitragen wird. 5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6 1. Introduction The Arctic is a region of vast opportunities and challenges for the United States of America, Canada and the whole world. The North of our planet has long been neglected; however, due to the climate change and the melting of the Arctic ice, politics are giving more and more attention to the region. The enormous amount of natural resources, primarily oil and gas, as well as the new transportation routes through the ice-free Arctic in the near future are a reasonable incentive for governments to act. One of the major Arctic issues is the sovereignty. ―Who owns the Arctic?‖ – is a vehemently debated question among Canada, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, Denmark (through Greenland) and Norway. Currently, those countries are actively increasing their capacity to protect and exercise their sovereign rights in the Arctic. At the same time, a number of areas north of the Arctic Circle remain disputed. One of them is a triangle in the Beaufort Sea, which is claimed by both the United States of America and Canada. The Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute is a highly intriguing and challenging case that has remained unresolved for a number of years. Despite strategic and traditionally friendly relations between the USA and Canada, the two neighbouring countries have not come to an agreement as to a suitable boundary line in the Beaufort Sea. Canada claims the maritime boundary to be along the 141st Meridian West out to a distance of 370 km, following a straight line of the Alaska-Yukon land border. On the contrary, the position of the United States is that the boundary line is perpendicular to the coast out to a distance of 370 km, following a line of equidistance from the coast of the Beaufort Sea. This difference creates a wedge with an area of about 21,000 km2 that is claimed by both nations. The area is known for having reach natural resources. Currently, the conflict is well-managed and does not pose any immediate threat to the region or USA-Canada relations. These two countries adhere to diplomacy and principles of peaceful dispute resolution
Recommended publications
  • On Uncertain Ice: the Future of Arctic Shipping and the Northwest Passage
    On Uncertain Ice: The Future of Arctic Shipping and the Northwest Passage by Whitney Lackenbauer and Adam Lajeunesse A POLICYDecember, PAPER 2014 POLICY PAPER On Uncertain Ice: The Future of Arctic Shipping and the Northwest Passage* by Whitney Lackenbauer CDFAI Fellow and Adam Lajeunesse St. Jerome’s University December, 2014 Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 www.cdfai.org ©2013 Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute ISBN: 978-1-927573-18-1 Executive Summary The Arctic sea-ice is in a state of rapid decline. Barriers to navigation that once doomed the likes of Sir John Franklin and closed the shortcut to the Orient now seem to be melting away. The prospect of shorter, transpolar transportation routes linking Asian and Western markets has inspired excitement and fear, and particularly the latter when it comes to Canadian sovereignty. This paper confirms recent studies suggesting that, in spite of the general trend towards reduced ice cover in the Arctic Basin, environmental variability, scarce infrastructure and other navigational aids, and uncertain economics make it unlikely that the Northwest Passage will emerge as a viable trans-shipping route in the foreseeable future. Instead, the region is likely to witness a steady increase in resource, resupply, and tourist destinational shipping. Accordingly, concerns that this increased activity will adversely affect Canadian sovereignty are misplaced. Rather than calling into question Canadian control, foreign vessels engaged in local activities are likely to reinforce Canada’s legal position by demonstrating an international acceptance of Canadian laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Game
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2012 The Arctic Game Sarah E. Nuernberger University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Climate Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Nuernberger, Sarah E., "The Arctic Game" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 894. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/894 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE ARCTIC GAME __________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Sarah E. Nuernberger June 2012 Advisor: Dr. Dale Rothman ©Copyright by Sarah E. Nuernberger 2012 All Rights Reserved Author: Sarah E. Nuernberger Title: THE ARCTIC GAME Advisor: Dr. Dale Rothman Degree Date: June 2012 Abstract Since outsiders first visited the Arctic, they have believed in man’s ability to conquer the region. Today’s Arctic conquest is not one of heroic exploration, but rather one of ownership and exploitation. This paper illustrates contestation in the Arctic through the metaphor of a game, with attendant prizes, players, and rules. It focuses on how to prevent the future destruction of the Arctic given the interactions of the Arctic’s landscape, prizes, players, and current management frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Militarization of the Arctic: Political, Economic and Climate Challenges
    UFRGSMUN | UFRGS Model United Nations Journal UFRGSMUN | UFRGS Model United Nations Journal ISSN: 2318-3195 | v1, 2013| p.11-70 The Militarization of the Arctic: Political, Economic and Climate Challenges Alexandre Piff ero Spohr Jéssica da Silva Höring Luíza Gimenez Cerioli Bruna Lersch Josuá Gihad Alves Soares 1. Historical background 1.1. Th e Arctic Region Th e Arctic is the northernmost area on Earth, covering approximately eight percent of the globe’s surface, and is centered on the North Pole. Th is region is delimited by the Arctic Circle (parallel of latitude 66°33’N) and includes the ice-covered Arctic Ocean and surrounding lands and seas1. Th ese surrounding lands are parts of the eight arctic bordering countries: Canada, Denmark (via Greenland), Finland, Iceland, Norway (via Svalbard archipelago), the Russian Federation, Sweden and the United States (via Alaska). Th e climate in this zone is classifi ed as polar, with cold and long winters, when the temperature can drop below -50°C. According to archaeological studies, the Arctic has been inhabited by humans before the last Ice Age, close to 30,000 years ago (Sale and Potapov 2009, 12), but little is known about the people who inhabited the area in the earliest times. Th e fi rst signifi cant Arctic people of which we are aware of are the Eskimos2, who emigrated from Asia to Alaska, crossing the Bering Strait, about 5,000 years ago. Th e Arctic currently hosts a population of four million indigenous people - descendants of those fi rst Eskimos - which are scattered in small groups within the borders of the Arctic surrounding countries (Sale 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • The Debate Over the Legal Status of the Northwest Passage
    THE DEBATE OVER THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE Explanatory Notes by Dr. Suzanne Lalonde Full Professor, Faculty of Law, Université de Montréal 17 Octobre 2018 1. THE OFFICIAL CANADIAN POSITION . When Joe Clark, then Secretary of State for External affairs, stood in the House of Commons on 10 September 1985 to announce that Canada was drawing baselines’ around the outer edge of the Canadian Arctic archipelago, he took pains to emphasize that “these baselines define the outer limit of Canada’s historic internal waters.” . This was and has remained the official position of the Government of Canada: that all of the waters within the archipelago (enclosed within those lines since 1 January 1986) are Canadian internal waters on the basis of a historic title. Under international law, a State may validly claim a historic title over a marine space if it can show that it has, (1) for a considerable length of time, (2) effectively exercised its exclusive authority over the maritime area in question. In addition, it must show that, during the same period of time, the exercise of authority has been (3) acquiesced in by other countries, especially those directly affected by it. Obviously, the 3rd criterion is a very real obstacle given the United States’ letter of protest* and that of the European Community (via the British High Commission)† in 1985 following the Clark announcement. (* I was recently informed that the American letter may not have constituted a formal, official letter of protest.) († At the time, the member States of the European Community did not have a common foreign policy which raises doubts as to the capacity of the British Government to presume to speak on behalf of the “European Community”.) .
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Imperative
    Arctic Imperative EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES FOR CANADIAN SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface by Canadian Geographic Education 2 Introduction by Dr. Shelagh D. Grant 3 Contributors 4 Lessons 1. Mapping the Arctic: An Introduction to Arctic Issue 5 2. People of the Arctic 15 3. The Northwest Passage and National Identity 35 4. Resource Development and Arctic Sovereignty 43 5. Climate Change and the Arctic 49 6. Contemporary Sovereignty Issues: Arctic Council Simulation 55 Glossary 63 Preface The Canadian Arctic has been an abiding interest of the Royal Canadian Geographical Society since its creation in 1929. The first issue of Canadian Geographical Journal (now Canadian Geographic) featured an article on Canada’s north and the coverage has continued to this day, a result of reader interest and editorial decision-making. For all that we have written about the North, it remains for most Canadians a place of the imagination, a vast, largely unpopulated expanse stretching across the top half of a map of the country. For those who live in the territories it is, of course, home - a vibrant and dynamic region of increasing strategic significance not only to Canada but also to the world. For Dr. Shelagh Grant the Arctic is the focus of her teaching and research over the course of her career. Her landmark work, Polar Imperative: A History of Arctic Sovereignty in North Amer- ica (Douglas & McIntyre, 2010) is a comprehensive and authoritative survey of the region. The book merited the recognition it so justly received such as the Lionel Gelber Prize for best English language book on global affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical and Legal Background of Canada's Arctic Claims
    THE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND OF CANADA’S ARCTIC CLAIMS ii © The estate of Gordon W. Smith, 2016 Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism St. Jerome’s University 290 Westmount Road N. Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G3 www.sju.ca/cfpf All rights reserved. This ebook may not be reproduced without prior written consent of the copyright holder. LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Smith, Gordon W., 1918-2000, author The Historical and Legal Background of Canada’s Arctic Claims ; foreword by P. Whitney Lackenbauer (Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Monograph Series ; no.1) Issued in electronic format. ISBN: 978-0-9684896-2-8 (pdf) 1. Canada, Northern—International status—History. 2. Jurisdiction, Territorial— Canada, Northern—History. 3. Sovereignty—History. 4. Canada, Northern— History. 5. Canada—Foreign relations—1867-1918. 6. Canada—Foreign relations—1918-1945. I. Lackenbauer, P. Whitney, editor II. Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism, issuing body III. Title. IV. Series: Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Monograph Series ; no.1 Page designer and typesetting by P. Whitney Lackenbauer Cover design by Daniel Heidt Distributed by the Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Please consider the environment before printing this e-book THE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND OF CANADA’S ARCTIC CLAIMS Gordon W. Smith Foreword by P. Whitney Lackenbauer Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Monograph Series 2016 iv Dr. Gordon W. Smith (1918-2000) Foreword FOREWORD Dr. Gordon W. Smith (1918-2000) dedicated most of his working life to the study of Arctic sovereignty issues. Born in Alberta in 1918, Gordon excelled in school and became “enthralled” with the history of Arctic exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Canadian Parliamentary Delegation Respecting Its
    Report of the Canadian Parliamentary Delegation respecting its participation at the Meeting of the Standing Committee of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association Washington, D.C., United States of America March 12-13, 2013 Report INTRODUCTION Ryan Leef, M.P., led a Canadian delegation of two to the meeting of the Standing Committee of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region (the Standing Committee) held in Washington, D.C. on 12-13 March 2013. The delegation also included Mr. Dennis Bevington, M.P. Ms. Shauna Troniak from the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament attended as advisor to the delegation. The Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region (the Conference) is a parliamentary body comprising delegations appointed by the national parliaments of the eight Arctic states (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, the United States of America) and the European Parliament. The Conference also includes Permanent Participants representing Indigenous peoples, as well as observers. The Conference meets every two years. The Tenth Conference was held in Akureyri, Iceland, 5-7 September 2012. The Eleventh Conference will be held in Whitehorse, Yukon, 9-11 September 2014. The Conference adopts a statement with recommendations to the Arctic Council (the Council) and to the governments of the Arctic states and the European Commission. The Standing Committee closely monitors how governments implement the Conference Statement, and take new initiatives to further Arctic cooperation.1 Between conferences, Arctic parliamentary cooperation is facilitated by the Standing Committee,2 which began its activities in 1994. The Conference and Standing Committee take initiatives to further Arctic cooperation, and act, in particular, as a parliamentary forum for issues relevant to the work of the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on the Arctic: a New Arena of Geostrategic Importance and Great Powers Rivalry
    AFET Committee of the European Parliament: Hearing on the Arctic: a new arena of geostrategic importance and great powers rivalry Testimony concerning: Shipping through the Arctic - Freedom of navigation, new commercial routes and civil security issues in the Arctic Rebecca Pincus, PhD1 Assistant Professor, US Naval War College Arctic Strategy Advisor, US Dept. Of Defense Summary: Arctic warming has drawn attention to emerging shipping routes through the Arctic Ocean. These routes offer potential time and fuel savings on shipping between some northern ports in Asia, Europe, and North America. Of the three major routes—the Northwest Passage, the Transpolar Route, and the Northern Sea Route—only the NSR is currently of commercial interest. However, significant challenges to safe shipping are present around the Arctic basin. These include sea ice hazards, changing weather, lack of infrastructure, distant rescue services, communication problems, and more. Section 1. Shipping Routes in the Arctic Ocean The Northwest Passage The Northwest Passage traverses Canada’s northern coastline. Several different routes may be used to travel between the northern Atlantic and northern Pacific. From the Bering Strait, ships travel east through the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, and then may take the Amundsen Gulf or McClure Strait. Several routes are possible through the islands of the Canadian Arctic archipelago.2 Some of the channels, in particular Simpson Strait, have draft restrictions, others have complex currents. Ice conditions vary and may block travel through these routes. Traveling eastwards, ships will exit the Northwest Passage through either Baffin Bay and the Hudson Strait, or Hudson Strait and the Labrador Sea, ending up in the Atlantic Ocean southeastwards of Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • Problematizing and Addressing the Article-As-Concept
    Problematizing and Addressing the Article-as-Concept Assumption in Wikipedia Yilun Lin Bowen Yu, Andrew Hall Brent Hecht Northwestern University University of Minnesota Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois Minneapolis, Minnesota Evanston, Illinois [email protected] {bowen, hall}@cs.umn.edu [email protected] ABSTRACT semantic web engines (e.g. [2,49,55]) to natural language Wikipedia-based studies and systems frequently assume that understanding systems (e.g. [16,37,52]). no two articles describe the same concept. However, in this paper, we show that this article-as-concept assumption is A key assumption in many Wikipedia-based studies and problematic due to editors’ tendency to split articles into systems is that there is a one-to-one mapping between a parent articles and sub-articles when articles get too long for concept and the Wikipedia article that describes the concept. readers (e.g. “Portland, Oregon” and “History of Portland, This assumption, which we call the article-as-concept Oregon” in the English Wikipedia). In this paper, we present assumption, supposes that the entire description of a given evidence that this issue can have significant impacts on concept in a given Wikipedia language edition can be found Wikipedia-based studies and systems and introduce the sub- in a single Wikipedia article. For example, under the article- article matching problem. The goal of the sub-article as-concept assumption, the entirety of the English matching problem is to automatically connect sub-articles to description of Portland, Oregon should be in the “Portland, parent articles to help Wikipedia-based studies and systems Oregon” article, and that article alone.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Environmental Risks of Arctic Vessel Traffic Acknowledgments
    Navigating the North An Assessment of the Environmental Risks of Arctic Vessel Traffic Acknowledgments This paper is funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Ocean Conservancy would like to thank the Foundation for their generous support of this research. We would also like to thank DNV-GL, Vard Marine, Nuka Research, Leslie Pearson and Sian Prior for their review and/or contributions to this report, as well as countless others who offered their expertise and insight in this effort. Cover photo credit: © Coast Guard News / Flickr © Coast Guard photo credit: Cover | Suggested citation: Ocean Conservancy. (2017). Navigating the North: An Assessment Navigating the North | 3 © Wollwerth Imagery / Fotolia Imagery© Wollwerth / Fotolia of the Environmental Risks of Arctic Vessel Traffic. Anchorage, AK. Contents 3 Introduction 5 Overview of Arctic vessel traffic governance 3.1 United Nations Convention 1 on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 32 Background and context 3.2 International Maritime Organization (IMO) 33 1.2 Human dimensions 10 3.2.1 International Convention for the 1.3 Biodiversity of the Arctic Safety of Life At Sea (SOLAS) 33 marine ecosystem 10 3.2.2 International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution 1.4 Climate change impacts on from Ships (MARPOL) 33 the Arctic marine ecosystem 12 3.2.3 The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code) 34 2 3.2.4 Other IMO instruments 36 The past, present and future 3.3 Arctic-specific national regulations 36 of vessel traffic in the Arctic 3.4 Arctic Council 37 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Mitigating New Risks in Location-Aware Technologies
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Understanding and Mitigating New Risks in Location-Aware Technologies A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of Computer Science By Allen Yilun Lin EVANSTON, ILLINOIS June 2021 2 c Copyright by Allen Yilun Lin 2021 All Rights Reserved 3 ABSTRACT Understanding and Mitigating New Risks in Location-Aware Technologies Allen Yilun Lin Location-aware technologies, such as personal navigation applications, location-based AR games, and artificial intelligence systems that learn from data about places, increas- ingly mediate our understanding of and interactions with the world. However, a number of risks associated with location-aware technologies have emerged, jeopardizing the welfare of its users. This dissertation seeks to understand and mitigate two such emerging risks associated with location-aware technologies - safety and geographic biases. The first part of this dissertation focuses on understanding and mitigating the safety issues in one of the most popular location-aware technologies - personal navigation systems. We analyzed catastrophic incidents that involved the use of personal navigation applications, identified technological causes that contributed to these incidents, and designed solutions to mitigate the most prominent technological causes. The second part of this dissertation focuses on mitigating the geographic biases in two types of location-aware technologies that leverage data-driven artificial intelligence - location-aware technologies based on computer vision and location-aware technologies based on knowledge base. 4 Acknowledgements I owe appreciations to many people who helped me tremendously throughout this journey. First, I wanted to thank my advisor Dr. Brent Hecht. I have always told my friends that, as a PhD student I could not have imagined a better advisor than you.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Geopolitics: a Conflict in the Arctic
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND GEOPOLITICS: A CONFLICT IN THE ARCTIC LISA COVINO i SAINT PAUL UNIVERSITY Climate change and Geopolitics: A Conflict in the Arctic Written by LISA COVINO Under the supervision of Dr. Heather Eaton Thesis presented at the faculty of superior studies of Saint Paul University In the Graduate Program of Conflict Studies For the Master’s Degree of Arts Conflict Studies Faculty of Human Sciences May 2018 © Lisa Covino, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 Abstract This thesis is focused on the redefinition of the Canadian domestic and foreign Arctic policies based on a model of sustainability and sustainable development customized for the Arctic region. More specifically, since the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Arctic has become a pivotal region in terms of energy resources and economic opportunities due to the influence of the effects of climate change on the region. In fact, climate change is considered the prime trigger of ecological phenomena such as raising of the average seasonal temperatures, thawing of the sea ice and dysfunctional patterns of precipitations. As a result, fundamental ecological mechanisms determining the equilibrium and survival of the ecosystem, such as the albedo effect, are affected, producing alterations in the ecosystem’s biodiversity and physical composition. Therefore, this thesis will focus on the causal relationship that links climate change with both ecological changes and geopolitical and economic opportunities. First, I will analyze this region from an ecological perspective, thus I will define the Arctic as an ecosystem, which means a systemic unit in the planetary environmental system of ecological mechanisms. Through the theory of tipping points, I will demonstrate the crucial role played by the stability of this region in the determination of planetary wind and oceanic currencies.
    [Show full text]