Guide for Small and Medium Enterprises in the Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Product Trade in Central Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guide for Small and Medium Enterprises in the Sustainable Non-Timber Forest Product Trade in Central Africa Guide for small and medium enterprises in the sustainable non-timber forest product trade in Central Africa Abdon Awono Verina Ingram Jolien Schure Patrice Levang Guide for small and medium enterprises in the sustainable non-timber forest product trade in Central Africa Abdon Awono Verina Ingram Jolien Schure Patrice Levang CIFOR produced this guide as the result of a collaboration with the FAO, SNV, ICRAF, the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife in Cameroon, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation, Nature and Tourism in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Central African Forest Commission (COMIFAC) as part of a European Union financed project, GCP/RAF/408/EC Forests for Poverty Reduction: Mobilising Small and Medium Size Forest Enterprises in Central Africa, 2006–2010. www.fao.org/forestry/enterprises/45716/en/ © 2013 Center for International Forestry Research. All rights reserved Awono, A., Ingram, V., Schure, J. and Levang, P. 2013 Guide for small and medium enterprises in the sustainable non-timber forest product trade in Central Africa. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Photos: Ousseynou Ndoye, Verina Ingram, Abdon Awono, Marcus Ewane, Arend van der Goes and Jolien Schure CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org Contents Introduction 1 Why are NTFPs important? 2 Risks and challenges in NTFP trade 4 Exploiting NTFPs – today and tomorrow 6 The rules on NTFP trade 7 Tips for doing good business 12 Improving harvesting techniques 15 Post-harvest technologies 15 Adding value 18 Diversifying 19 Knowing your market 19 Innovations in financing 21 Cultivating and domesticating for long-term security of supply 22 For more information 23 List of figures, boxes, and tables Figures 1. Markets and NTFPs in Cameroon 3 2. Key plant NTFPs in Cameroon, by annual trade value 4 Boxes 1. What are Non-timber forest products? 1 2. Harvesting eru sustainably 6 3. ‘Special forest products’ in Cameroon 10 4. From small trader to major wholesaler: Safou ‘queen’, Esther Foungong in Makenene 14 Table 1. The costs of bribery in NTFP chains in Cameroon and the DRC 11 Introduction The commercialisation of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) (see Box 1) in poor, rural, forested environments can provide important cash income for local populations, as well as traders, processors and retailers in urban areas. Many rural community members harvest and process a variety of products cultivated on farms, in fallows and from the forest, as harvest seasons are mostly short and vary per product. The use of different products diversifies livelihoods and makes the most of the opportunities presented by Box 1. What are Non-timber forest products? Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) are goods of biological origin (plant, fungi and animal) from natural, modified or managed forested landscapes. They include fruits and nuts; vegetables; fish and game; medicinal plants; resins; essences; fuel wood and barks; and fibres such as bamboo, rattans and other palms and grasses. The term ‘non-wood forest products’ is also used, which excludes all woody raw materials, including fuel wood and small woods used for domestic tools and equipment, covered by the term NTFPs. Also excluded are exotic forest products now farmed and found in the wild in the Congo Basin, such as rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and quinine (Chinconia spp.). Fuel wood is classified as an NTFP in the legal framework in Gabon, the Central African Republic and Cameroon. NTFPs are often classified by their use, with the most common uses being food; forage; utensils; tools for construction; medicines; aromatic products and colorants; and objects of ornament, art and of cultural value. All parts of both plants and animals are used and can be classified as NTFPS: fruits, seeds, leaves, stems, barks, resins, roots, flowers and wood; meat, hides, hair, horns, hooves and other animal parts. Often different parts of the same plant or animals are used for multiple purposes. These products may be directly consumed, sold, given as gifts or bartered. High-value NTFPs such as bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis), eru or fumbwa (Gnetum spp.), honey and wax, gum arabic, raffia (Raphia farinifera), cola acuminata, safou (Dacryodes edulis) and pygeum (Prunus africana) provide on average 42% of annual income for harvesters’ households. In the main production areas, the price received by harvesters can be determined by the market, the season, the level of organisation of producers (meeting buyers individually or in group), the abundance of production, consumer demand, the costs of taking the product to market and the perishability of the product. Guide for small and medium enterprises in the sustainable non-timber forest product trade nature. In Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), on average, about 39% of harvesters interviewed work together in groups, as small and medium enterprises based on NTFPs. The livelihoods of those involved in NTFP enterprises can be considered sustainable when they can cope with and recover from stresses and shocks, and when living standards and assets can be maintained or even enhanced, both now and in the future, while not undermining the natural resource base that communities depend upon.1 Why are NTFPs important? A business based on sustainable exploitation of NTFPs can have a number of benefits: NTFPs create high economic value and large-scale employment. Lively local, regional and international markets exist despite the fact that these products remain largely unrecorded in national statistics or export figures. In Cameroon, at least 25 major markets trade significant volumes of different NTFPs (see Figure 1). NTFPs can also be found in nearly every market in small quantities for everyday use. At least 570 plants and 110 animal species in Cameroon are used as NTFPs. The estimated market value of the 45 main NTFPs traded in Cameroon, including bushmeat, fish, fuel wood and plant-based products, is worth around US$1.028 billion annually. At least 283,000 people in Cameroon and 70,000 people in the DRC are involved in businesses based on 15 of the major NTFPs, thus the total number for the whole sector is much larger. This represents more than twice of formally recorded employment in the forest sector both in Cameroon and in the DRC. Providing food security. Thirty percent of the NTFPs harvested in Cameroon and the DRC are used for food. This includes bushmeat that provides essential protein, vegetables such as baobab leaves, fruits such as safou, oil-providing seeds such as moabi (Baillonella toxisperma), spices such 1 Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK. 2 Abdon Awono, Verina Ingram, Jolien Schure and Patrice Levang Products NIGERIA Ezezang Palm nut Andok Olum Ikom Kola nut Safou Mamfe Bitter Kola Gnetum Zoameyong CAMEROON Essock Olum fruit Onié bark Eba e Mvonglo Ndong Nding Andok vert Symmetry Calabar Tetrapleura Termites Makenene Fiango Komen Foasse Ikang Ekondo Titi Sa'a Muea Edenau Tiko New-Bell Limbe Mfoundi Abong Mbang Mutengene EQUATORIAL Mbalmayo GUINEA Biwong-Bané Mesok Ebolowa Abang Minko'o Kye-Ossi National Road Region 0 50 100 150 EQUATORIAL GABON ± Km GUINEA CONGO Figure 1. Markets and NTFPs in Cameroon as bush pepper and njansang (Ricinodendron heudelotii) and stimulants such as Cola acuminate and bitter cola (Garcinia kola). For example, in Equator Province in the DRC, fumbwa (Gnetum spp.) comprises 6% of NTFPs eaten in harvesters’ households and in Kinshasa consumers eat it about once a week. The cost of a dish offumbwa in small restaurants (accessible to different classes) in Kinshasa is on average US$0.76. In Cameroon, a dish of eru, in the same type of restaurants, is around US$1, making it an affordable food source. Essential to health. Over 500 plants in Cameroon and the DRC are used locally for medicinal reasons. For rural households, these plants provide an important and low cost source of healthcare. Some of the highest value-per- volume NTFPs are also exported for use by the pharmaceutical industry, such as pygeum (Prunus africana), yohimbe (Pausinystaliayohimbe), moabi (Baillonella toxisperma) and Voacanga (Voacanga africana). This sector is an interesting niche as a substantial local processing is required, which should lead to additional employment and sustainable growth of SMFEs. 3 Guide for small and medium enterprises in the sustainable non-timber forest product trade 0 1,000,000,000 1 0 2 100,000,000 t n 10,000,000 e l i 1,000,000 v i u 100,000 q e 10,000 $ S 1,000 U 100 e u l 10 a V 1 Figure 2. Key plant NTFPs in Cameroon, by annual trade value Source: CIFOR data 2007–2010 Providing tax revenues. NTFPs that are classified as ‘special forest products’2 in Cameroon, and those requiring ‘special’ or ‘ordinary’ permits in the DRC generate tax revenues. However, as most trade of NTFPs is outside of the permit system, tax revenues are still modest. This system could be improved by reforms to NTFP regulation policy, for instance by opening the market officially to small traders under some rules. This would certainly reduce corruption along the chain, and maximise tax revenues and benefit for traders. The easiest way to realise this is to get producers organised through associations or small and medium enterprises. Risks and challenges in NTFP trade Although the trade for many NTFPs, such as cola and raffia is centuries old, small and medium forest enterprises often find it difficult to optimise profits and manage NTFPs sustainably at the same time. They face risks and challenges, which can lead to only short-term returns, rather than sustainable, viable businesses. These risks include: 2 Decision No. 0336/D/MINFoF 6 July 2006, defining the list of special forest products of particular interest to Cameroon.
Recommended publications
  • Communities at the Heart of Forest Management: How Can the Law Make a Difference? Sharing Lessons from Nepal, the Philippines and Tanzania
    February 2019 Communities at the heart of forest management: How can the law make a difference? Sharing lessons from Nepal, the Philippines and Tanzania 2 Communities at the heart of forest management: How can the law make a difference? Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Nathalie Faure, Benjamin Ichou and Tanja Venisnik. It was developed in the context of a DFID-funded project in which international and national NGOs collaborate to advance equitable and sustainable community livelihoods in the Congo Basin.1 The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to the contributors to this report. The country analyses of Nepal, the Philippines and Tanzania community forestry laws were conducted by Dil Raj Khanal, Edna Maguigad and Rahima Njaidi respectively, who we thank for their groundwork and useful guidance. They also supported the organisation and conduct of interviews with key stakeholders in-country. Our thanks also to the individuals, communities and organisations we consulted in each country, who provided valuable insights on the implementation of community forestry in practice. We would like to thank in particular the Visayas State University (Philippines), MJUMITA (Tanzania) and FECOFUN (Nepal) for their support in organising the field visits. We would like to thank the experts who, at the earlier stage of our research, shared their experiences of community forestry in different countries, and provided some helpful insights and materials: Driss Ezzine de Blas (CIRAD), Dr David Ganz (RECOFTC), Dr Don Gilmour (University of the Sunshine Coast), Mary Hobley (independent consultant), Peter O’Hara (Participatory Natural Resources Management – PNRM Consultants), Dominique Reeb (formerly of FAO) and Dr Cédric Vermeulen (University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech).
    [Show full text]
  • GEF Prodoc TRI Cameroon 28 02 18
    International Union for the Conservation of Nature Country: Cameroon PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Supporting Landscape Restoration and Sustainable Use of local plant species and tree products (Bambusa ssp, Irvingia spp, etc) for Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Livelihoods and Emissions Reduction in Cameroon BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Republic of Cameroon has a diverse ecological landscape, earning her the title “Africa in Miniature”. The southern portions of Cameroon’s forests are part of the Congo Basin forest ecosystem, the second largest remaining contiguous block of rainforest on Earth, after the Amazon. In addition to extensive Mangrove belts, Cameroon also holds significant portions of the Lower Guinea Forest Ecosystems and zones of endemism extending into densely settled portions of the Western Highlands and Montagne forests. The North of the country comprising the Dry Sudano-Sahelian Savannah Zones is rich in wildlife, and home to dense human and livestock populations. Much of the population residing in these areas lives in extreme poverty. This diversity in biomes makes Cameroon one of the most important and unique hotspots for biodiversity in Africa. However, human population growth, migrations, livelihoods strategies, rudimentary technologies and unsustainable land use for agriculture and small-scale forestry, energy and livestock, are contributing to biodiversity loss and landscape degradation in Cameroon. Despite strong institutional frameworks, forest and environmental policies/legislation, and a human resource capital, Cameroon’s network of biomes that include all types of forests, tree-systems, savannahs, agricultural mosaics, drylands, etc., are progresively confronted by various forms of degradation. Degradation, which is progressive loss of ecosystem functions (food sources, water quality and availability, biodversity, soil fertility, etc), now threatens the livelihoods of millions of Cameroonians, especially vulnerable groups like women, children and indigenous populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Forests
    Project of Independent Observation in Support of Forest Law Enforcement in Cameroon Approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Forests Report No. 027 En Joint Mission: Central Control Unit – Independent Observer ------------------------------- Title: None Location: Central Province Mission date: September 20-21, 2002 Company: GCI Nyanzom, IBC Independent Observer (Global Witness): Mr. Stuart Wilson, Project Director Mr. Owada Jean Cyrille, Technical Assistant Mr. Tangyie Ché Célestine, Driver TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 2. RESOURCES USED ............................................................................................. 2 3. COMPOSITION OF THE MISSION................................................................ 2 4. CONSTRAINTS ..................................................................................................... 2 5. RESULTS OF THE MISSION............................................................................ 2 5.1. Summary of the case ............................................................................................. 2 5.2. Meetings with IBC representatives and various external services representatives 2 5.3. Official hearing of the Ombessa forest law enforcement official ......................... 3 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................... 4 Appendix .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Forestry Laws
    GEORGIA FORESTRY LAWS 1 GEORGIA FORESTRY LAWS – 2021 This material is provided as a courtesy, for general information only. Legal information can, and often does, change rapidly. The Georgia Forestry Commission is not liable for the distribution of out-of-date material. This document is not legal advice and cannot replace legal advice. Current Georgia Statutes and Bills are maintained by the Georgia General Assembly, and can be accessed through their website. 2 CONTENTS TITLE 12 - CHAPTER 6 - ARTICLE 1 FOREST RESOURCES PART 1 STATE FORESTRY COMMISSION 12-6-1. Definitions 12-6-2. Creation of State Forestry Commission; members; terms office; ineligibility of Governor for membership; vacancies; effect of appointment when Senate not in session. 12-6-3. Chairman; reimbursement of members for expenses; meetings 12-6-4. Dismissal of members for failure to attend meetings 12-6-5. Powers and duties of commission generally; volunteer services 12-6-5.1. Legislative findings; reforestation incentives program authorized; powers of commission 12-6-6. Management, conservation, and protection of forest lands; sale of forest products from land managed by commission; production and sale of seedlings 12-6-7. Federal financial aid -- Participation in rural fire prevention and control program; contributions by counties and fire departments 12-6-8. Federal financial aid -- Expenditure of funds for forest farming and marketing of forest products 12-6-9. Acquisition of land; gifts of land for use as lookout tower sites; abandoned tower sites; improvements on land subject to reversionary clause 12-6-10. Reports to General Assembly 12-6-11. Director -- Appointment; qualifications; salary; reimbursement for expenses; term 12-6-12.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Outbreak
    Emergency appeal final report Cameroon: Cholera outbreak Emergency appeal n° MDRCM011 GLIDE n° EP-2011-000034-CMR 31 October 2012 Period covered by this Final Report: 04 April 2011 to 30 June 2012 Appeal target (current): CHF 1,361,331. Appeal coverage: 21%; <click here to go directly to the final financial report, or here to view the contact details> Appeal history: This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 04 April 2011 for CHF 1,249,847 for 12 months to assist 87,500 beneficiaries. CHF 150,000 was initially allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the national society in responding by delivering assistance. Operations update No 1 was issued on 30 May 2011 to revise the objectives and budget of the operation. Operations update No 2 was issued on 31st May 2011 to provide financial statement against revised budget. Operations update No 3 was issued on 12 October 2011 to summarize the achievements 6 months into the operation. Operations update No 4 was issued on 29 February 2012 to extend the timeframe of the operation from 31st March to 30 June 2012 to cover the funding agreement with the American Embassy in Cameroon. PBR No M1111087 was submitted as final report of this operation to the American Embassy in Cameroon on 03 August 2012. Throughout the operation, Cameroon Red Cross volunteers sensitized the populations on PBR No M1111127 was submitted as final report of this how to avoid cholera. Photo/IFRC operation to the British Red Cross on 14 August 2012. Summary: A serious cholera epidemic affected Cameroon since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasts and Dekadal Climate Alerts for the Period 11Th to 20Th July 2021
    REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN REPUBLIC OF CAMEROON Paix-Travail-Patrie Peace-Work-Fatherland ----------- ----------- OBSERVATOIRE NATIONAL SUR NATIONAL OBSERVATORY LES CHANGEMENTS CLIMATIQUES ON CLIMATE CHANGE ----------------- ----------------- DIRECTION GENERALE DIRECTORATE GENERAL ----------------- ----------------- ONACC www.onacc.cm; [email protected]; Tel : (+237) 693 370 504 / 654 392 529 BULLETIN N° 86 Forecasts and Dekadal Climate Alerts for the Period 11th to 20th July 2021 th 11 July 2021 © NOCC July 2021, all rights reserved Supervision Prof. Dr. Eng. AMOUGOU Joseph Armathe, Director General, National Observatory on Climate Change (NOCC) and Lecturer in the Department of Geography at the University of Yaounde I, Cameroon. Eng. FORGHAB Patrick MBOMBA, Deputy Director General, National Observatory on Climate Change (NOCC). Production Team (NOCC) Prof. Dr. Eng. AMOUGOU Joseph Armathe, Director General, National Observatory on Climate Change (NOCC) and Lecturer in the Department of Geography at the University of Yaounde I, Cameroon. Eng. FORGHAB Patrick MBOMBA, Deputy Director General, National Observatory on Climate Change (NOCC). BATHA Romain Armand Soleil, PhD student and Technical staff, NOCC. ZOUH TEM Isabella, M.Sc. in GIS-Environment and Technical staff, NOCC. NDJELA MBEIH Gaston Evarice, M.Sc. in Economics and Environmental Management. MEYONG Rene Ramses, M.Sc. in Physical Geography (Climatology/Biogeography). ANYE Victorine Ambo, Administrative staff, NOCC. MEKA ZE Philemon Raissa, Administrative staff, NOCC. ELONG Julien Aymar,
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Centre Region of Cameroon
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 18 February 2020 Land Use and Land Cover changes in the Centre Region of Cameroon Tchindjang Mesmin; Saha Frédéric, Voundi Eric, Mbevo Fendoung Philippes, Ngo Makak Rose, Issan Ismaël and Tchoumbou Frédéric Sédric * Correspondence: Tchindjang Mesmin, Lecturer, University of Yaoundé 1 and scientific Coordinator of Global Mapping and Environmental Monitoring [email protected] Saha Frédéric, PhD student of the University of Yaoundé 1 and project manager of Global Mapping and Environmental Monitoring [email protected] Voundi Eric, PhD student of the University of Yaoundé 1 and technical manager of Global Mapping and Environmental Monitoring [email protected] Mbevo Fendoung Philippes PhD student of the University of Yaoundé 1 and internship at University of Liège Belgium; [email protected] Ngo Makak Rose, MSC, GIS and remote sensing specialist at Global Mapping and Environmental Monitoring; [email protected] Issan Ismaël, MSC and GIS specialist, [email protected] Tchoumbou Kemeni Frédéric Sédric MSC, database specialist, [email protected] Abstract: Cameroon territory is experiencing significant land use and land cover (LULC) changes since its independence in 1960. But the main relevant impacts are recorded since 1990 due to intensification of agricultural activities and urbanization. LULC effects and dynamics vary from one region to another according to the type of vegetation cover and activities. Using remote sensing, GIS and subsidiary data, this paper attempted to model the land use and land cover (LULC) change in the Centre Region of Cameroon that host Yaoundé metropolis. The rapid expansion of the city of Yaoundé drives to the land conversion with farmland intensification and forest depletion accelerating the rate at which land use and land cover (LULC) transformations take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Forest Law Enforcement in Peninsular Malaysia
    OVERVIEW OF FOREST LAW ENFORCEMENT IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA Prepared by Rusli Mohd Amat Ramsa Yaman March 2001 Highlights of this report were presented at a workshop on Illegal Logging in East Asia, Sponsored by World Bank - WWF Alliance* in Jakarta, Indonesia, August 27-28, 2000 WWF MALAYSIA Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank to the Director General of Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia and his staffs for their support and comments to this report. Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………. ii Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………... iii Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………....iV PART 1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………......1 Background …………………………………………………………………...................... 1 Constitutional Setting …………………………………………………………...................1 Forestry Administration ...……………………………………………………....................1 Timber Harvesting Rights ...………………………………………………….................... 2 Forests and Wood-based Industries in Peninsular Malaysia ………………..................2 Status of Forested Area and Log Flow in Peninsular Malaysia ……..............................2 Constribution of the Wood-based Industry to the Economy ..………............................ 3 PART 2 PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………....5 PART 3 PREVENTION STRATEGIES ……………………………………………………….... 6 Legal Strategies ………………………………………………………………................... 6 Forest Policy and Long Term Plan …………………………………………….................6 Forest Management Plan ………………………………………………………................7 Forest Manual
    [Show full text]
  • TABANIDÆ DU CAMEROUN FRANÇAIS Par Jean RAGEAU, Paul GRENIER Et Jean-Paul ADAM
    TABANIDÆ DU CAMEROUN FRANÇAIS Par Jean RAGEAU, Paul GRENIER et Jean-Paul ADAM L’importance que présente l’étude des Tabanidæ en relation avec la transmission mécanique des trypanosomes pathogènes a été sou­ lignée par la Conférence Inter africaine sur la Tsé-tsé et la Trypano­ somiase, tenue à Brazzaville (A.E.F.), en février 1948. A la suite d’une suggestion du Professeur P.-A. Buxton, le British Muséum (Natural History) a chargé H. Oldroyd de réaliser une monographie des Tabanidæ de la Région éthiopienne, dont le premier volume (Hæmatopota et Hippocentrum) a paru en 1952 et le deuxième (Ta­ banus s. l. et Thaumastocera) en 1954. Il en est résulté un renouveau d’intérêt pour ces Diptères dont l’étude, relativement poussée dans la décade qui précéda la première guerre mondiale, avait été négligée depuis au profit d’autres grou­ pes : Glossines, Moustiques, etc.. Dès 1948, nous avons entrepris l’observation et la récolte systé­ matique des Tabanidæ du Cameroun français et nous avons adressé nos collections à H. Oldroyd qui nous les a très obligeamment déter­ minées. Cependant, Harant et Brygoo (1949), puis Brygoo (1950) publiaient une liste d’une vingtaine d’espèces provenant presque toutes d’Ayos, dans la région du Haut-Nyong. Bien auparavant, Gravot [in Martin, Lebœuf et Roubaud (1909)] avait cité dix espèces dans le Sud-Cameroun, et Ziemann (1911) avait mentionné l’existence de vingt et une espèces d’après les déter­ minations de Grünberg. Entre la première guerre mondiale et 1949, aucun travail ne semble avoir été publié sur les Tabanidæ du Ca­ meroun, bien que quelques espèces aient été incidemment citées par Rousseau (1920), Jojot (1921) et Guibert (1937), à l’occasion d’étu­ des sur la maladie du sommeil et les filarioses.
    [Show full text]
  • Ales' Contribution to Case Managment of Buruli Ulcer
    ALES' CONTRIBUTION TO CASE MANAGMENT OF BURULI ULCER IN AFRICA Dr Alphonse Um Boock CONTENTS •INTRODUCTION • BURULI ULCER IN THE TARGET COUNTRIES • ALES' SUPPORT •IMPACT •CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION • ALES, which was set up in 1959, is a founding member of ILEP. • It is an NGO with a deep commitment to controlling the most neglected diseases and those who are left aside. • Leprosy , tuberculosis and more recently Buruli ulcer to cite but a few, are mainly responsible for the suffering we seek to relieve. INTRODUCTION • A half century of unstinting effort to control leprosy in several countries in the world, including Cameroon and the Central African Republic in Africa. • For almost six years now, ALES has been concerning itself with the suffering of Buruli ulcer patients in Cameroon , the Central African Republic and soon, Gabon. THE BURULI ULCER SITUATION IN THE TARGET COUNTRIES 1. CAMEROON 2. GABON 3. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC CAMEROON • A central African country • Between Lat. 2 and 13 N • Between Long. 9 and 16 E • Some 16 000 000 inhbts. • Area: 475.650 Km² • Three climate zones: • Equatorial, Sudanese tropical, Sahelian tropical. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL HISTORY OF BU • 1975 : Ravisse and collaborators • 1977 : Boisvert and collaborators • 2000 1st epidemiological survey in the Nyong river basin: Juergen Noeske and collaborators •2004 1st national survey : Um Boock and collaborators DISTRIBUTION IN THE COUNTRY 76 51 25 AD CE ES EN 229 SU 342 SU-O SELECTED DATA 800 705 700 600 500 438 400 300 265 225 200 120 100 0 0 Année 200 Année 2001 Année 2002 Année 2003 Année 204 Année 2005 RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEM AND STRATEGIES • Development of a national programme • The health district at the heart of the control effort • Redefinition of the minimum package in endemic areas, with the inclusion of rehabilitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Environmental Service Payments for Forest Retention and Recruitment in a Costa Rican Biological Corridor
    Copyright © 2009 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Morse, W. C., J. L. Schedlbauer, S. E. Sesnie, B. Finegan, C. A. Harvey, S. J. Hollenhorst, K. L. Kavanagh, D. Stoian, and J. D. Wulfhorst. 2009. Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a Costa Rican biological corridor. Ecology and Society 14(1): 23. [online] URL: http:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art23/ Research Consequences of Environmental Service Payments for Forest Retention and Recruitment in a Costa Rican Biological Corridor Wayde C. Morse 1,2, Jessica L. Schedlbauer 1,2, Steven E. Sesnie 1,2, Bryan Finegan 1, Celia A. Harvey 1,3, Steven J. Hollenhorst 2, Kathleen L. Kavanagh 2, Dietmar Stoian 1, and J. D. Wulfhorst 2 ABSTRACT. Compensation to landowners for forest-derived environmental services has gained international recognition as a mechanism to combat forest loss and fragmentation. This approach is widely promoted, although there is little evidence demonstrating that environmental service payments encourage forest stewardship and conservation. Costa Rica provides a unique case study in which a 1996 Forestry Law initiated environmental service payments and prohibited forest conversion to other land uses. We examined these novel policies to determine their influence on landowner decisions that affect forest change, carbon services, and connectivity in a 2425 km² biological corridor. We used Landsat images to compare land-cover changes before and after 1996, and linked these data to landowner surveys investigating land-use decisions. Carbon stocks and storage in secondary forests were also examined. Forest change observations were corroborated by landowner survey data, indicating that the 1996 Forestry Law and environmental service payments contributed positively to forest retention and recruitment.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Fires: a Country-By- IUCN Country Analysis of Forest and Land the World Conservation Union Fires in the ASEAN Nations
    Framing Fires: A country-by- IUCN country analysis of forest and land The World Conservation Union fires in the ASEAN nations Prepared by European Union Dr. David Ganz Project FireFight South East Asia P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB Jakarta, Indonesia Tel: +62 251 622 622 Fax: +62 251 622 100 www.pffsea.org IUCN The World Conservation Union IUCN - World Headquaters Rue Mauverney 28 CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 999 0001 Fax: +41 22 999 0002 ASEAN nations in the and land fires A country-by-country analysis of forest Framing Fires: www.iucn.org WWF International Avenue du Mont-Blanc CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 364 9019 Fax: +41 22 364 064 www.panda.org/forests4life Panda Symbol © 1986 WWF ® WWF Registered Trademark Framing Fires: A country-by- country analysis of forest and land fires in the ASEAN nations Prepared by Dr. David Ganz Cover photos: Background picture: Eucalyptus plantation in Congo by Dr. Takeshi Toma, CIFOR Four small cover pictures from left to right: Efforts to extinguish fires East Kalimantan in 1998; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Indonesia Forest fires in Kinabatangan, Sabah in 1998; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Malaysia Haze from 1998 fires in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Malaysia Forest fire in Costa Rica by Stephen Homer, ACDI-CIDA Large cover picture: Kahayan River Under Smoke (d) © WWF/ Alain Compost Project FireFight South East Asia is a Global Initiative of IUCN – The World Conservation Union and WWF – The World Wide Fund for Nature funded by the European Union and supported by the US Forest Service This publication was prepared by staff and consultants of Project FireFight South East Asia.
    [Show full text]