DOCSLIB.ORG

Sebastian Carisio Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sebastian Carisio Th EVALUATING AREAL ERRORS IN NORTHERN CASCADE GLACIER INVENTORIES by Sebastian P. Carisio A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geography Fall 2012 © 2012 Sebastian P. Carisio All Rights Reserved EVALUATING AREAL ERRORS IN NORTHERN CASCADE GLACIER INVENTORIES by Sebastian P. Carisio Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael A. O’Neal, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Tracy L. DeLiberty, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Geography Approved: __________________________________________________________ Nancy M. Targett, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Earth, Ocean, and Environment Approved: __________________________________________________________ Charles G. Riordan, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my extreme gratitude for the education, support, and experience provided by the faculty of the University of Delaware Department of Geography for both my undergraduate and graduate degrees as well as my graduate certificate. I am forever grateful for the array of opportunities, exposure to the application of numerous geospatial technologies in new environments, and the solid foundation of my technical skillset generously bestowed to me by my advisor, Dr. Michael O’Neal. Without his supervision and knowledge, my academic and professional success would be limited. I would also like to thank my other committee members: my co-advisor Dr. Brian Hanson for his judgment and available experience, as well as Dr. Tracy DeLiberty for her academic guidance since 2005. For this thesis in particular, I need to recognize the immense GIS work and previous analyses of Ashley Satinsky, and the operators from the Fall 2010 GEOG 604 class and Phillip Hendrickson for their participation in the manual digitization error assessment and snowpack variability respectively. I would like to express my gratitude for the assistance of Kevin Brinson with calculating real mean aspect. I must acknowledge the impressive work of Tessa Montini for programming a suite of Python-based software to batch calculate the set of glacier hypsometric statistics that were vital to this study. Also crucial were the raw 2005-2007 DEMs produced by Harvey Greenberg at the University of Washington. Lastly, I offer many thanks to Claire O’Neal for her assistance in editing this thesis. iii I have received so much acceptance and feedback from the close-knit community of Geography graduate students especially my Pearson 207 and 208/211 officemates. I must recognize the constant backing of Renato Kane who has accompanied me on the same path from the literal beginning of our education. I am forever thankful for the absolute love, reinforcement, and prayers of my parents, brother, sister-in-law and all members of the CO and PA Carisio and Majeski families. Ultimately, I owe everything to Alison Hayes. It has been with Alison’s total love, her care, her intellect, and her faith that I have been able to accomplish this part of my education and continue to live and work at my full potential with her unwavering support. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 2 BACKGROUND AND METHODS .................................................................. 3 2.1 Study Area ................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Areal Digital Error Assessments ............................................................... 3 2.2.1 Area Error Estimates ..................................................................... 4 2.3 Digital Elevation Models and Hypsometric Statistics Production ............ 5 2.3.1 Foundational Digital Elevation Models ......................................... 6 2.3.2 Glacier Elevation Preprocessing .................................................... 7 2.3.3 Areal and Surficial Statistics ......................................................... 8 2.3.4 Hypsometric Statistics ................................................................... 9 3 RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Areal and Surficial Derivatives ............................................................... 12 3.2 Hypsometric Derivatives ......................................................................... 12 3.3 Errors and Areal Change ......................................................................... 14 4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................... 16 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A COMPOSITE 2006 DEM STATISTICS FOR 742 NORTH CASCADE GLACIER INVENTORY ................................................................................ 38 B PYTHON SCRIPTS FOR HYPSOMETRIC DERIVATIVES ........................ 68 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Growing Glacier Correlation Matrix. Correlation matrix for all areal, hypsometric, and surficial derivatives for the 10 growing glaciers. .................................................................................................... 34 Table 2 Shrinking Glacier Correlations. Correlation matrix for all areal, hypsometric, and surficial derivatives for the 240 shrinking glaciers. .... 35 Table A1 Areal and Surficial Statistics for Composite A.D. 2006 DEM. Table is continued through to page 55. ................................................... 38 Table A2 Hypsometric and Surficial Statistics for Composite A.D. 2006 DEM. Table is continued through to page 67. ........................................ 56 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Study Area with Glacier Extents. A. Reference map representing the State of Washington with study area boundary. B. Shaded relief map of the North Cascades displaying the relative elevation (i.e., light green = high and dark green = low) and extent of the 742 glaciers (in blue) analyzed in this study. .................................................................... 19 Figure 2 Slope Raster Sample. Sample glacier boundaries (black) displaying 15-meter slope raster values atop composite A.D. 2006 shaded relief and 15-meter DEM. ................................................................................. 20 Figure 3 Aspect Raster Sample. Sample glacier boundaries (black) displaying 15-meter aspect raster values atop composite A.D. 2006 shaded relief and 15 meter DEM. ................................................................................. 21 Figure 4 Glacier Centroids in Study Area. Shaded relief map of the North Cascades displaying the relative elevation (i.e., light green = high and dark green = low) and distribution of centroid point locations (in white) for the 742 glaciers analyzed in this study. .................................. 22 Figure 5 Glacier Geometry. Idealized glacial accumulation and ablation profiles in comparison to generalized, geometric slope profiles. Slope profile types (dark grey) are A. straight B. concave, C. convex, D. concave/convex. White form (outlined in blue) represents the profile of a glacier where thicker upslope sections display accumulation and thinner upslope sections display ablation. ............................................... 23 Figure 6 Glacier Area. Histogram displaying the frequency distribution of A.D. 2006 inventory areas in square kilometers for 742 glaciers. .......... 24 Figure 7 Glacier Perimeter. Histogram displaying the frequency distribution of A.D. 2006 inventory perimeters in meters for 742 glaciers. ............... 25 Figure 8 Glacier Length. Histogram displaying the frequency distribution of A.D. 2006 inventory lengths in meters for 742 glaciers. ........................ 26 vii Figure 9 Real Mean Aspect. Rose diagram showing percentage of the real mean aspect for 742 glaciers based on aspect values obtained from the composite A.D. 2006 DEM. Grey frequency wedges are separated in to 15 degree equal interval classes. The gold line plots the overall mean (20.3 degrees) and the blue arc represents the standard deviation. ................................................................................................. 27 Figure 10 ELA Distribution. Shaded relief map with A.D. 2006 composite DEM ELAs displayed by the glacier centroids within the study area. Legend (bottom left) shows ramped colors corresponding to 10, equal interval ELA classes from 1192 to 2733 meters. .................................... 28 Figure 11 Skewness Sensitivity. Deviation of skewness values, from the original glacier boundary (x-axis), for each glacier within each error level (15m shrink, 15m expand, 30m shrink, 30m expand). ................... 29 Figure 12 Kurtosis Sensitivity. Deviation of kurtosis values, from the original glacier boundary (x-axis), for each glacier within each error level (15m shrink, 15m expand,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Article Magma Loading in the Southern Coast Plutonic Complex, British Columbia and Washington
    GeoScienceWorld Lithosphere Volume 2020, Article ID 8856566, 17 pages https://doi.org/10.2113/2020/8856566 Review Article Magma Loading in the Southern Coast Plutonic Complex, British Columbia and Washington E. H. Brown Department of Geology, Western Washington University, USA Correspondence should be addressed to E. H. Brown; [email protected] Received 2 May 2020; Accepted 22 September 2020; Published 10 November 2020 Academic Editor: Tamer S. Abu-Alam Copyright © 2020 E. H. Brown. Exclusive Licensee GeoScienceWorld. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The southen end of the 1800 km long Coast Plutonic Complex (CPC), exposed in the Harrison Lake area of British Columbia and in the North Cascades of Washington, bears a record of great crustal thickening -20 to 40 km in localized zones during Late Cretaceous times. During this period, the CPC was positioned at the continental margin during collision/subduction of the Farallon plate. Arc magmatism and regional orogenic contraction were both active as potential crustal thickening processes. Magmatism is favored in this report as the dominant factor based on the delineation of four spatially and temporally separate loading events, the close association of the loaded areas with emplacement of large plutons, and a paucity of evidence of deep regional tectonic contraction. The timing and spatial location of crustal loading events are documented by the following: zircon ages in plutons; an early event of low pressure in pluton aureoles evidenced by andalusite, now pseudomorphed by high- pressure minerals; high pressures in country rock in pluton aureoles measured by mineral compositions in the assemblages garnet-biotite-muscovite-plagioclase and garnet-aluminum silicate-plagioclase; high pressures recorded in plutons by Al-in- hornblende barometry; and uplift ages of plutons derived from K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages of micas and hornblende in plutons.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol
    Wednesday, August 13, 2008 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for the Northern Spotted Owl; Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:05 Aug 12, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13AUR2.SGM 13AUR2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_2 47326 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Background habitat designation in the westside It is our intent to discuss only those provinces. The landscape management Fish and Wildlife Service topics directly relevant to the revised approach for the eastside provinces, designation of critical habitat in this identified in the 2008 final recovery 50 CFR Part 17 rule. For more information on the plan (USFWS 2008) and by the northern spotted owl and critical Sustainable Ecosystems Institute (SEI) [FWS-R1-ES-2008–0051; 92210-1117-0000- Scientific Panel (SEI 2008) as the most FY08-B4] habitat, please refer to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on effective approach for managing RIN 1018-AU37 June 12, 2007 (72 FR 32450). northern spotted owl habitat in dry Prior and subsequent to the listing of forests, was not incorporated into this Endangered and Threatened Wildlife the northern spotted owl in 1990 (55 FR rule because it cannot be translated into and Plants; Revised Designation of 26114), many committees, task forces, critical habitat at this time, until the Critical Habitat for the Northern and work groups were formed to new approach called for by the recovery Spotted Owl develop conservation strategies for the plan is further defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Summits
    EVERETT MOUNTAINEERS Recommended Winter Summits Snow and weather conditions greatly influence the difficulty of winter scrambles. Because conditions change very quickly, things like road access, avalanche hazard, strenuousness, and summit success can vary a tremendous amount. So these ratings are only a rough comparison of the peaks. Winter scrambling can be a dangerous activity. Be a smart scrambler -- be willing to turn back if conditions are unsafe. Even a slight deviation from the surveyed routes may affect exposure and avalanche hazard considerably. The fact that a peak is listed here does not represent that it will be safe. Exposure Rating Avalanche Rating A: Falling will only get snow on your face. B: Falling may require self arrest, but usually good A: Usually safe in high, considerable, moderate, and low run-out. avalanche conditions. C: Falling requires self arrest, unchecked falls could B: Often safe in moderate and low conditions. be serious. C: Only recommended in low conditions. Note that B-rated slopes could become C-rated when icy. Table of contents by region (peaks within each region listed from West to East): Highway 542 (Mt Baker Highway): Church, Excelsior, Barometer, Herman, Table Highway 20 (North Cascades Highway): Goat, Welker, Sauk, Lookout, Hidden Lake, Oakes, Damnation, Trappers, Sourdough, Ruby Highway 530 (Darrington area): Higgins, Round, Prairie Mountain Loop Highway: Pilchuck, Gordon (Anaconda), Long, Marble, Dickerman Highway 2 (west & east of Stevens Pass): Stickney, Persis, Philadelphia, Frog, Mineral Butte, Iron, Conglomerate Point, Baring, Palmer, Cleveland, Eagle Rock, Evergreen, Captain Point, Windy, Tunnel Vision, Big Chief, Cowboy, McCausland, Union, Jove, Lichtenberg, Jim Hill, Rock, Arrowhead, Natapoc, Tumwater I-90 (west & east of Snoqualmie Pass): Teneriffe, Green, Mailbox, Washington, Web, Kent, Bandera, Defiance, Pratt, Granite, Humpback, Silver, Snoqualmie, Kendall, Guye, Catherine, Margaret, Baldy, Thomas, Amabalis, Hex, Jolly, Yellow Hill, Teanaway Butte Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary Geologic Map of the Mount Baker 30- by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington by R.W. Tabor1 , R.A. Haugerud2, D.B. Booth3, and E.H. Brown4 Prepared in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Olympia, Washington, 98504 OPEN FILE REPORT 94-403 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iu.S.G.S., Menlo Park, California 94025 2U.S.G.S., University of Washington, AJ-20, Seattle, Washington 98195 3SWMD, King County Department of Public Works, Seattle, Washington, 98104 ^Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 INTRODUCTION The Mount Baker 30- by 60-minute quadrangle encompasses rocks and structures that represent the essence of North Cascade geology. The quadrangle is mostly rugged and remote and includes much of the North Cascade National Park and several dedicated Wilderness areas managed by the U.S. Forest Service. Geologic exploration has been slow and difficult. In 1858 George Gibbs (1874) ascended the Skagit River part way to begin the geographic and geologic exploration of the North Cascades. In 1901, Reginald Daly (1912) surveyed the 49th parallel along the Canadian side of the border, and George Smith and Frank Calkins (1904) surveyed the United States' side. Daly's exhaustive report was the first attempt to synthesize what has become an extremely complicated geologic story.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the North Cascade Range, Washington by Ralph A
    Prepared in cooperation with Washington State Division of Geology and Earth Resources, U.S. National Park Service, and U.S. Forest Service Geologic Map of the North Cascade Range, Washington By Ralph A. Haugerud and Rowland W. Tabor Nontechnical pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2940 Looking south from the North Klawatti Glacier [Mbse]. In the right foreground, the glacier breaks into a heavily crevassed icefall where it descends steeply. Rock in the foreground knob is Eldorado Orthogneiss (unit TKgo), a 90 million-year-old stitching pluton, which here includes numerous dikes of light- colored pegmatite. Mount Buckner on the left skyline and Mount Forbidden hidden in clouds are also eroded from the Eldorado Orthogneiss (photographed in 1987). 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Using this report ....................................................................................................................................1 Map preparation ...................................................................................................................................1 Major sources of new data .................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 Mountaineer Outings
    The Mountaineer The Mountaineer 1969 Cover Photo: Mount Shuksan, near north boundary North Cascades National Park-Lee Mann Entered as second-class matter, April 8, 1922, at Post Office, Seattle, Wash., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Published monthly and semi-monthly during June by The Mountaineers, P.O. Box 122, Seattle, Washington 98111. Clubroom is at 7191h Pike Street, Seattle. Subscription price monthly Bulletin and Annual, $5.00 per year. EDITORIAL STAFF: Alice Thorn, editor; Loretta Slat­ er, Betty Manning. Material and photographs should be submitted to The Mountaineers, at above address, before Novem­ ber 1, 1969, for consideration. Photographs should be black and white glossy prints, 5x7, with caption and photographer's name on back. Manuscripts should be typed double-spaced and include writer's name, address and phone number. foreword Since the North Cascades National Park was indubi­ tably the event of this past year, this issue of The Mountaineer attempts to record aspects of that event. Many other magazines and groups have celebrated by now, of course, but hopefully we have managed to avoid total redundancy. Probably there will be few outward signs of the new management in the park this summer. A great deal of thinking and planning is in progress as the Park Serv­ ice shapes its policies and plans developments. The North Cross-State highway, while accessible by four­ wheel vehicle, is by no means fully open to the public yet. So, visitors and hikers are unlikely to "see" the changeover to park status right away. But the first articles in this annual reveal both the thinking and work which led to the park, and the think­ ing which must now be done about how the park is to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Trip Planner
    National Park Service North Cascades National Park Service Complex U.S. Department of the Interior Stephen Mather Wilderness An Enduring Legacy of Wilderness “[I]t is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness.” — Wilderness Act, 1964 The North Cascades National Park Complex includes 684,000 acres in three units: North Cascades National Park, Lake Chelan National Recre- ation Area, and Ross Lake National Recreation Area. Congress has designated 94% of the Complex as the Stephen Mather Wilderness. Today, as in the past, wilderness is an important part of every American’s story. People seek out wilderness for a variety of reasons: physical or mental challenge; solitude, renewal, or a respite from modern life; or as a place to find inspiration and to explore our heritage. What draws you to visit wilderness? The Stephen Mather Wilderness is at the heart of over two million acres of some of the wildest lands remaining, a place “where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man….” Untrammeled (meaning“free of restraint,” “unconfined”) captures the essence of wilderness: a place where the natural processes of the land prevail, and the developments of modern technological society are substantially unnoticeable. Here, we are visitors, but we also come home—to our natural heritage. It is a place to experience our past, and a place to find future respite. This is the enduring legacy of wilderness. To Hope, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Itinerary © 2011 American Alpine Institute, Ltd
    www.aai.cc www.guideschoice.com [email protected] Administrative Office: 360-671-1505 The Spirit of Alpinism Equipment Shop: 360-671-1570 Alpine Mountaineering and Technical Leadership Part 1 Sample Course Itinerary © 2011 American Alpine Institute, Ltd. Following is an example course itinerary. In most cases a great deal more will be covered during the day than what is listed here. It is important to understand that given conditions certain topics will receive more coverage than others. For example, early in the season more time will be given to snow stability whereas later in the season more time will be spent on ice technique. This is because early in the season there is more snow, whereas late in the season there is often more exposed ice. It is extremely important for those who participate in this course to understand that this itinerary is not set in stone. Changes may take place at any time due to weather or summit strategies. If you do not understand why an itinerary change occurred, please ask your guide. Day One • Meet at AAI and do a thorough gear check. • Drive to the South Side of Mount Baker. The trailhead may be found at 3,200 feet. On extremely early or extremely late season courses, some teams will go to the North Side of the Mountain. • Hike into Base Camp. Camp options include a semi-sheltered camp at the last trees at 5,600 feet, Sandy Camp at the end of the Railroad Grade at 6,000 feet or west of the moraines slightly higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Geology, V, 21, No. 1, March 1993
    WASHINGTON GEOLOGY Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources Vol. 21, No. 1, March 1993 The Cannon mine surface plant at the edge of the city of Wenatchee. Ore is hoisted to the surface from the shaft (center of photo) and is processed in the mill (lower right). The mine has been the largest gold producer in Washington for the past few years, as well as one of the largest underground gold mines in the United States. Production decreased in 1992 due to dwindling ore reserves. If no new reserves are identified, the mine is expected to close in about 2 years. In This Issue: Proposed seismic zone changes in western Washington, p. 2; Washington's mineral industry-1992, p. 3; Coal activity in Washington-1992, p. 31; Strong motion system installed in Natural Resources Building, p. 32; Addendum to oil and gas exploration activity in Washington, 1991 and 1992, p. 33; Fossil mayflies from Republic, Washington, p. 35; National Natural Landmarks Program in the Pacific Northwest region, p. 38; Tacoma Smelter stack demolished, p. 41. Proposed Seismic Zone WASHINGTON Changes in Western Washington by Timothy J. Walsh GEOLOGY In December 1991, Washington's Seismic Safety Advisory Committee presented its report on earthquake prepared­ Washington Geolo11Y (ISSN 1058-2134) Is published four times a year ness to the legislature. Although the bill to implement its by the Washington DE,partment of Natural Resources, Division of Geology recommendations died in the senate, some recommenda­ and Earth Resources. This publication Is free upon request. The Division also publishes bulletins, Information circulars, reports of Investigations, tions can be implemented with existing authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate-Climbs-Guide-1.Pdf
    Table of Conte TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface.......................................................................1 Triumph NE Ridge.....................................47 Privately Organized Intermediate Climbs ...................2 Vayu NW Ridge.........................................48 Intermediate Climbs List.............................................3 Vesper N Face..............................................49 Rock Climbs ..........................................................3 Wedge Mtn NW Rib ...................................50 Ice Climbs..............................................................4 Whitechuck SW Face.................................51 Mountaineering Climbs..........................................5 Intermediate Mountaineering Climbs........................52 Water Ice Climbs...................................................6 Brothers Brothers Traverse........................53 Intermediate Climbs Selected Season Windows........6 Dome Peak Dome Traverse.......................54 Guidelines for Low Impact Climbing...........................8 Glacier Peak Scimitar Gl..............................55 Intermediate Rock Climbs ..........................................9 Goode SW Couloir.......................................56 Argonaut NW Arete.....................................10 Kaleetan N Ridge .......................................57 Athelstan Moonraker Arete................11 Rainier Fuhrer Finger....................................58 Blackcomb Pk DOA Buttress.....................11 Rainier Gibralter Ledge.................................59
    [Show full text]
  • Equipment List
    www.alpineinstitute.com [email protected] Equipment Shop: 360-671-1570 The Spirit of Alpinism Administrative Office: 360-671-1505 1515 12th st Bellingham, WA 98225 ALPINE MOUNTAINEERING AND TECHNICAL LEADERSHIP PART 2 Bellingham, WA EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST The primary goal of any alpine climber should always be to carry as little as possible. What is left out of a backpack is often just as important as what is placed inside. Conditions in the mountains vary dramatically from season-to-season and sometimes even throughout the same day. This can make the process of preparing equipment for an alpine climb difficult. On the one hand, a climber wants to be light. But on the other, a climber wants to have everything he or she needs if there is a storm. This list was designed for the “worst case scenario” trip with significant inclement weather. In serious conditions it’s not uncommon for a climber to need every piece of clothing and equipment on this list. However, if a program does not encounter significant weather, there may be items here that are not used. As you prepare for your trip, it’s important to plan for the worst and hope for the best. On the first day of your program, an AAI guide will work with you to refine your mountain kit to ensure that you bring exactly what’s needed given the forecast. It is acceptable to bring too much clothing or equipment to your initial meeting. And it is acceptable to bring things that you have questions about. Extra equipment can always be left behind at the AAI shop.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES This is why a Forest Service "recreation area" is not adequate protection for the scenery, and why a North Cascades National Park is urgently needed. Glacier Peak from White Chuck River by Dick Brooks The Wild Cascades 2 SUNRISE ON A TIDAL WAVE When the North Cascades National Park is dedicated — and it will be, the only questions being which year and with how much acreage — many of those present at the ceremonies will breathe a prayer of thanks for the June 1965 issue of Sunset Magazine. For recent immigrants to the West who may not know, Sunset has a circulation numbered in the hundreds of thousands, and a readership in the millions. It's an influential magazine. People build houses, cook meals, and plan vacations from Sunset. So, what was on the cover of the June Sunset ? A photograph of a couple of kids poking around the shores of Lyman Lake, with Bonanza and clouds beyond. And a question: "DOES WASHINGTON GET THE NEXT NATIONAL PARK?" What was inside the June Sunset ? A full 14 pages on "Our Wil­ derness Alps. " A two-page color-spread of Glacier Peak from Image Lake, a full-page map of our proposed park and recreation area, three large photos by Tom Miller of peaks and meadows, and three more by Bob and Ira Spring and the editors. And many thousands of words about the geography and places to go — and about the need for protection. Very much about the need for protection. We park protagonists have done some publishing about our pro­ posal, and are going to do some more soon, but when the score is added up, the June 1965 Sunset will be counted one of the decisive blows.
    [Show full text]