The Effectiveness of Neurolytic Block of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Using
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
n e u r o l o g i a i n e u r o c h i r u r g i a p o l s k a 4 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 4 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pjnns Original research article The effectiveness of neurolytic block of sphenopalatine ganglion using zygomatic approach for the management of trigeminal neuropathy Malgorzata Malec-Milewska *, Bartosz Horosz, Dariusz Kosson, Agnieszka Sekowska, Hanna Kucia Pain Clinic: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: This study was performed to present the outcomes of trigeminal neuropathy management Received 10 March 2015 with the application of neurolytic block of sphenopalatine ganglion. This type of procedure is Accepted 31 August 2015 used in cases where pain is not well controlled with medical treatment. Twenty patients Available online 19 September 2015 were treated with sphenopalatine ganglion neurolysis after their response to pharmacolog- ical management was not satisfactory. Significant pain relief was experienced by all but one Keywords: patient and they were able to reduce or stop their pain medication. The time of pain relief was between a few months and 9 years during the study period. Number of procedures Neuropathic pain implemented varied as some of the patients have been under the care of our Pain Clinic for as Trigeminal neuropathy long as 18 years, satisfied with this type of management and willing to have the procedure Sphenopalatine ganglion repeated if necessary. It appears that neurolytic block of sphenopalatine ganglion is effective Neurolytic block enough and may be an option worth further consideration in battling the pain associated with trigeminal neuropathy. # 2015 Polish Neurological Society. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. extreme duration of TN and the destruction of peripheral 1. Introduction rami of the trigeminal nerve related to neurodestructive procedures or tumors and trauma. Due to its complex pathophysiology, the facial pain is a clinical It should not be confused with trigeminal neuralgia, where challenge. One of the most common causes of unilateral facial episodes of shooting pain prevail, with no sensory or motor pain is trigeminal neuralgia (TN). In some rare cases the deficits between them. Although the pain is usually predomi- clinical picture of TN change and progress to trigeminal nant in the clinical picture, its constant character and sensory neuropathy, which is characterized by constant pain accom- deficits that appear as the condition progresses – serve to panied by sensory disturbances, with only episodes of typical, differentiate between the two. It should also be noted that a neuralgiform pain. The cause of neuropathy may be an damage to the rami of trigeminal nerve may be caused by * Corresponding author at: Pain Clinic: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Ul. Czerniakowska 231, 00-416 Warszawa, Poland. Tel.: +48 22 58 41 220; fax: +48 22 58 41 342. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Malec-Milewska). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2015.08.010 0028-3843/# 2015 Polish Neurological Society. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. 390 n e u r o l o g i a i n e u r o c h i r u r g i a p o l s k a 4 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 4 many pathological processes, like malignant lesions [1]. autonomic symptoms (running nose, lacrimation, blood-shot Therefore, a thorough clinical evaluation is mandatory in all eyes) and was eventually named Sluder's neuralgia. Recent cases with facial numbness before symptomatic management research has confirmed the importance of SPG in pathophysi- is employed. ology of many types of facial pain and headaches, as well as As pharmacological management is moderately effective in stroke and cerebral vasospasm [3]. In spite of a 100 years of trigeminal neuropathy, substantial number of patients will not history, there is very limited number of papers reporting the be satisfied with pharmacotherapy or develop some significant long-term outcomes of its neurolytic blocks. side effects. In these cases the invasive procedures are mandated. In our center we use the neurolytic block of 1.1. Sphenopalatine ganglion anatomy sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG). This procedure had been performed in our center since 1990 and neurolytic agent used SPG consists of a large number of neurons that form the is 65% ethanol. There were attempts to replace it with triangular structure of approximately 5 mm. It is located on the radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RT), but it was abandoned outside of the cranium, in the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). due to the worse outcomes. In every case of trigeminal Pterygopalatine fossa contains SPG, maxillary artery with neuropathy treated with RT of SPG, the alcohol neurolysis was some of its branches, venous plexus and maxillary nerve. later performed, as improvement achieved with RT was not SPG is of mixed character: sensory, parasympathetic, and satisfactory. sympathetic. Its sensory root is provided by the sphenopala- Trigeminal neuropathy is the most common indication for tine nerves from maxillary nerve. They contain dendrites of neurolytic block of SPG in our center. We also use this the neurons located in trigeminal ganglion (hence the procedure in Horton migraine and tumor-related facial pain in beneficial effect of SPG block in TN). Sympathetic root is the area of trigeminal nerve innervation. It was used with formed by the efferent (postganglionic) fibers provided by deep success in typical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in the past, but petrosal nerve (a target of neurolytic block in trigeminal was replaced by RT of Gasserian ganglion more than 10 years neuropathy). Parasympathetic root is derived from facial nerve ago, as the latter proved to be much more effective in TN. It is a through the greater petrosal nerve. It is formed by dendrites of safe procedure, which – unlike neurolytic blocks of peripheral the neurons located in the upper salivary nucleus (blocking branches of TN – does not carry a risk of sensory deficits. parasympathetic fibers of SPG is indicated in trigeminal Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), or pterygo-palatine gangli- autonomic cephalalgias, like cluster headache) [4]. SPG on (PPG) and termination of its function in pathogenesis and anatomy is presented in Fig. 1. treatment of facial pain has been an issue of interest for more than a 100 years, since in 1908 Sluder described and performed 1.2. SPG blocks its block for the first time [2]. He had been using SPG blocks in patients with unilateral facial pain, located at the bridge of the SPG block is usually performed with the use of local nose, radiating to periorbital area, zygomatic process, mastoid anesthetics (cocaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine) and steroids. process and occipital area. This pain was to be accompanied by Neurolytic block is achieved with either chemical (ethanol or Fig. 1 – Sphenopalatine ganglion anatomy [4]. n e u r o l o g i a i n e u r o c h i r u r g i a p o l s k a 4 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 8 9 – 3 9 4 391 Table 1 – Patient characteristics and symptom description. M – male; F – female. NRS – pain severity expressed in Numeric Rating Scale (description in the text). V1, V2, V3 – first, second and third branch of trigeminal nerve. No. Sex/ Pain Duration of NRS NRS Buccal Previous interventions/ age distribution symptoms before continuous paroxysmal numbness cause of neuropathy SPG neurolysis 1 M/45 V1,V2,V3 7 years 5 8 Yes Microvascular decompression  2; V2 nerve blocks (alcohol) 2 M/56 V1,V2,V3 10 years 8 10 Yes Microvascular decompression 3 F/75 V1,V2, V3 17 years 4 9 Yes V2 nerve alcohol neurolysis 4 F/71 V2, V3 6 years 3 10 Yes None/time (6 years) 5 F/53 V2, V3 3 years 3 7 Yes Dental procedure followed by alcohol neurolysis of V2 6 F/76 V1, V2 17 years 3 8 Yes None/time 7 M/69 V2 4 years 3 7 Yes Alcohol V2 neurolysis 8 F/56 V1, V2, V3 20 years 5 9 No None/time (20 years) 9 M/79 V2, V3 20 years 5 8 No None/time (20 years) 10 M/71 V2, V3 8 years 5 9 Yes Alcohol V2 neurolysis 11 F/52 V1, V2, V3 6 years 4 10 Yes Alcohol V2 neurolysis 12 F/65 V1, V2 13 years 3 8 No None/time (13 years) 13 M/52 V1, V2 10 years 4 8 Yes None/time (10 years) 14 F/72 V1, V2 16 years 3 9 Yes None/time (16 years) 15 M/66 V1, V2 4 years 7 9 Yes Alcohol V2 neurolysis 16 F/59 V1, V2, V3 4 years 4 8 Yes Trauma to temp-mandib joint, alcohol V2 neurolysis 17 F/37 V2, V3 7 years 3 10 Yes Congenital polyneuropathy. Temp-mandib joint dysfunction 18 F/64 V2, V3 7 years 3 8 Yes Temp-mandib joint dysfunction 19 F/69 V2, V3 10 years 3 8 Yes None/time (10 years) 20 F/74 V2, V3 10 years 2 9 No None/time (10 years) phenol) or physical factors (temperature). Block techniques patient's consent were contraindications. The block was differ significantly considering their complexity. The least considered successful if resulted in cessation of constant pain invasive approach is via nasal cavity. It is an easy technique, and reduction or cessation of paroxysmal pain both immedi- used for blocks performed with local anesthetics and rarely for ately after the procedure and at the follow-up visit after 14 neurolytic blocks [5].