DOCSLIB.ORG

Module Cuzl331 Commercial Law 1: Agency and Sales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MODULE CUZL331 COMMERCIAL LAW 1: AGENCY AND SALES Maureen Banda-Mwanza LLB (UNZA), ACIArb ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the formulation of this module, tailored for the exclusive use of Cavendish University, the Author referred to various renown Commercial law books, quotations of which shall be minimized as much as is practicable. The good authors of the renowned works aforementioned are fully acknowledged for the relevance of their various pieces of work in the study of Commercial Law. CONTENTS PAGE TOPIC 1 TOPIC 1 AGENCY AT the end of this unit, students should be able to understand: 1. The requirements in forming an agency contract, formalities and capacity, 2. Authority of an agent 3. The duties of an agent 4. The Agent’s right against the Principal 5. The Principal’s relation with third parties 6. Various types of agency 7. How to terminate an Agency agreement Introduction Agency is one of the essential features of Commercial law. Commercial law is the law governing business contracts, bankruptcy, patents, trade-marks, designs, companies, partnership, export and import of merchandise, affreightment, insurance, banking, mercantile agency and usages. Agency can therefore be defined in the relationship which arises when one person (an agent) acts on behalf of another person (the principal) in a manner that the agent has power to affect the principal’s legal position with regard to a third-party. Common law explains the basic rule of an agency relationship in the Latin maxim “Qui facit per alium, facit per se” the literal English translation of which is he who acts by another acts by himself. This rule goes to highlight just to what extent a principal is bound by an act of his agent done in the principal’s name. The agency relationship forms a triangular set of relationships that are considered pertinent at law, viz; i. The relationship between the principal and the agent ii. The relationship between the principal and a third-party iii. The relationship between the agent and a third-party, which may be created in certain situations. UNIT 1: Formation of Agency; formalities and capacity An agency relationship between an agent and a principal can be created in any one of the following three ways: a. By consent b. By operation of the law c. By the doctrine of apparent authority or agency by estoppels a. Agency by Consent This arises in instances where the principal authorizes the agent to do an act on his behalf and the agent does it. This is called actual authority and it is a consensual legal relationship between the principal and the agent. Such kind of authority can be: • Express or implied as was the case in Garnac Co.Inc. V. H.M.E. Faure and Fairdough Limited (1968) A.C. 1130, 1137; 2All E.R. 353, 358 where Lord Pearson stated that express authority is given by express words such as is evidenced in a power of attorney. Implied authority can be inferred from the conduct of the parties and the circumstances of the case. • Precedent or subsequent. It is precedent if the principal consents to it prior to the carrying out of the Act and it is subsequent if the principal ratifies the Act after it has been carried out. • The doctrine of the apparent authority. A third party is not expected to concern himself with the precise limit of authority of the agent. The third party is only concerned with the apparent authority, which as far as the third party is concerned is the real authority. In other words apparent authority is the authority of an agent as it appears to others. - See per Scutton L.J. in Reckitt vs Barnett Pembroke and Slater, Ltd (1928)2.K.B.244,257. Under this doctrine therefore the principal may be bound to third parties because the agent appeared to have authority when actually there was no such authority between the principal and the agent. ACTIVITY1: Questions for Discussion. 1. What is the definition of Agency? 2. How is an agent by Consent created? 3. Discuss the act of ratification by a Principal. 4. What is understood by apparent authority? Formalities. Robert Lowe in Commercial Law states that no formalities are required for the appointment of an agent. However, there is an exception to the general rule in that in conveyancing matters such as the sale of Land , an agent has to be appointed by a Deed known as the Power of Attorney to execute a Deed that can be held to be valid. Capacity The general rule is that a person has the capacity to appoint an agent or ratify the acts one purporting to be an agent. Minor A minor cannot in certain instances appoint an agent such as in the case of disposal of property. A minor cannot give a valid Power of Attorney, unless such minor is a married woman. Mental Disorder Robert Lowe states that the general rule is that where a party to a contract is of unsound mind, the contract is binding upon him unless he can prove that he was so insane that he did not know what he was doing and this was known to the other party. See Imperial Loan Company v Stone (1892) 1Q.B 599, However, in Young v Toynbee, the agency Contract was held to terminate the agents authority automatically even though the agent was not aware of the principal’s insanity. The general rule therefore appears not to apply to agency contracts, which becomes void if the principal is of unsound mind. See Young v Toynbee (1910) 1K.B. 215 An agent can act for both parties as long as there will be no conflict of interest or breach of duties to the first principal. An agent need not have full contractual capacity, as he is a mere link between two contracting parties, as long as he understands what he is doing-See Co. Litt 54aForeman v. W.Ry (1878) 38LT. 851, (the principal of an illiterate is in the same as he and not the agent had signed a document: Re D. Argibau (1880) 15 Ch.D.228,246 but the agent’s liability to his principal would depend on his contractual capacity. In Zambia the Companies Act 388 of the Laws provides that if a person is an infant, or is under legal disability that person is not eligible to be appointed as a company Director. The partnership Act of England of 1890, which is applicable to Zambia states that a person can only be a partner if he has capacity to contract, thus agents such as Company Directors and partners have to have the contractual capacity, which in Zambia is the age of 1 8. ACTIVITY2: Questions for discussions 1. For what purpose is the Power of Attorney created? 2. Can a minor be an agent? Discuss 3. Principal P. is insane. Is his agent’s action binding on him? Agent’s relationship with third parties Generally when an agent makes a contact on behalf of the principal, the contract is between the principal and the third party. The agent acquires no rights or obligations under the contract. Agents of the state can never be personally liable over the state’s failure to perform a contractual obligation. In the case Stickrose (Pty) Ltd v The Permanent Secretary Ministry of Finance (1999) ZR 155 the appellant obtained judgment against the respondent for the payment of a specified sum in United States Dollars plus interest. The state was prepared to liquidate the debt in monthly installments but the payment was not being paid monthly. The appellant commenced committal proceedings against the respondent. The trail judge refused to grant an order for committal. The Appellant appealed. It was held amongst others that the public officers need protection of the Law; they are not to be harassed by way of civil action as a means of enforcing Judgments against the state. Sakala C.J. noted that a Permanent Secretary is only an agent who executed his duties within the budgetary allocation and if the government had no money, the Permanent Secretary cannot be expected to mint the money. The learned trial judge refused to grant the Order of Committal. The court stated that, under the State proceeding Act, the court was not competent to issue a Committal Order against Mr. James Mtonga ( the permanent secretary) as an individual. The Court then went ahead and dismissed the appeal. Disclosed and Undisclosed Agency Disclosed Agency Where the agent reviews that he is acting as an agent that is disclosed. The agent’s liability to third parties may depend on whether the agency was disclosed or not. Where the principal disclosed, he and not the agent is liable on the contract and may be sued. In Sui yin Kwan v Eastern insurance (1994) 2A.C 199 the ship Osprey was owned by Axelson. Their agent Rishstone was asked to insure the ship which they did in Richstone’s own name. The ship was destroyed by a typhoon and lost many crew. The relatives of two of the crew sued Axelson and were successful, but when it subsequently went into liquidation, they sued the insurance company who claimed they only knew Richstone and not Axelson. It was held that the doctrine of undisclosed Principal appears. The Principal acted within its agent’s actual authority and the undisclosed principal may acquire the rights/ liability of the agent. Thus the relatives could recover from the insurance company. Undisclosed Agency The third party has an elective right to sue either the agent or the principal, where the agent does not disclose the principal.
Recommended publications
  • Frequently Overlooked Risk Management Issues in Contracts of Affreightment and Sale Contracts

    Frequently Overlooked Risk Management Issues in Contracts of Affreightment and Sale Contracts

    Frequently overlooked risk management issues in contracts of affreightment and sale contracts 2021 AMPLA Queensland Conference Chris Keane MinterEllison 18 June 2021 The focus of today’s presentation - risk associated with two contracts used to facilitate the export of Australian commodities: . the sale contract / offtake agreement / supply agreement (sale contract) . the contract of affreightment / voyage charterparty / bill of lading (sea carriage contract) Specific focus is on risk and risk mitigation options that are frequently overlooked (both at the time of contract formation and also when disputes arise) 2 Risk arising out of seemingly straightforward issues . Duration of the sale contract - overarching issue that impacts on many other considerations; legal and commercial considerations will overlap . Port(s) of loading and port(s) of discharge - relevant considerations include: access to certain berths; special arrangements regarding loading and unloading; port congestion and other factors likely to cause delay; and the desirability of not requiring a CIF buyer to nominate a specific port of unloading (e.g. “one safe port and one safe berth at any main port(s) in China…”) . Selection of vessel - risk will depend on which party to the sale contract is responsible for arranging the vessel; CIF sellers need to guard against the risk of selecting an unsuitable vessel; FOB sellers need to ensure they have a right to reject an unsuitable vessel nominated by the buyer 3 Risk arising out of seemingly straightforward issues . Selection of contractual carrier - needs to be considered as an issue separate from the selection of the vessel; what do you know (and not know) about the carrier?; note the difficulties the contractual carrier caused for both the seller and buyer in relation to the ‘Maryam’ at Port Kembla earlier this year; proper due diligence is critical; consider (among other things) compliance with anti-slavery, anti-bribery and sanctions laws and issues concerning care of seafarers, safety and environment .
  • Norms, Formalities, and the Statute of Frauds: a Comment

    Norms, Formalities, and the Statute of Frauds: a Comment

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1996 Norms, Formalities, and the Statute of Frauds: A Comment Eric A. Posner Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric Posner, "Norms, Formalities, and the Statute of Frauds: A Comment," 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1971 (1996). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORMS, FORMALITIES, AND THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS: A COMMENT ERIC A. POSNERt INTRODUCTION Jason Johnston's Article makes three contributions to the economics and sociology of contract law.' First, it provides a methodological analysis of the use of case reports to discover business norms. Second, it makes a positive argument about the extent to which businesses use writings in contractual relations. Third, it sets the stage for, and hints at, a normative defense of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) section 2-201. Although the first contribution is probably the most interesting and useful, I focus on the second and third, and comment only in passing on the first. I conclude with some observations about the role of formalities in contract law. I. JOHNSTON'S POSITIVE ANALYSIS A. The Hypothesis Johnston's hypothesis is that "strangers" use writings for the purpose of ensuring legal enforcement. "Repeat players" do not use writings for this purpose because they expect that nonlegal sanctions will deter breach.
  • Electronic Seal Certificates

    Electronic Seal Certificates

    Certification Policy Electronic Seal Certificates Version: 190507 Classification: Public Certification Policy Electronic Seal Certificates Version history Version Section and changes Date of publication 190121 ● New Certification Policy for Electronic Seal 21/01/2019 Certificates that groups together all existing policies regarding this type of certificate. May be consulted at http://firmaprofesional.com/cps ​ 190507 ● Homogenization of the terminology of Public 07/05/2019 Administration Seal. ● Period of validity of Public Administration Seal certificates increased from 3 to 5 years. ● Validation of applicant’s email before issuing the certificate. ● Changed the CA that issues the Public Administration Seal to “AC Firmaprofesional - CUALIFICADOS”. Page 2 of 12 Certification Policy Electronic Seal Certificates Index 1. Introduction 4 1.1. General description 4 1.2. Identification of the Document 5 2. Participating entities 6 2.1. Certification Authorities (CA) 6 2.2. Registration Authority (RA) 6 2.3. Applicant 6 2.4. Subscriber 7 2.5. Third parties trusting in certificates 7 3. Certificate features 7 3.1. Certificate Validity Period 7 3.2. Specific use of certificates 8 3.2.1. Appropriate use of certificates 8 3.2.2. Non authorised use of certificates 8 3.3. Rates 8 4. Operations procedures 9 4.1. Certificate issuance process 9 4.2. Certificate revocation 11 4.3. Certificate renewal 11 5. Certificate profiles 12 Page 3 of 12 Certification Policy Electronic Seal Certificates 1. Introduction 1.1. General description Firmaprofesional issues this Certification Policy for Electronic Seal Certificates, grouping together distinct policies that defines certificates intended to sign, on behalf of the organization or body, electronic documents automatically under the responsibility of the certificate subscriber.
  • Volume Contracts of Affreightment – Some Features and Principles

    Volume Contracts of Affreightment – Some Features and Principles

    Volume Contracts of Affreightment – Some Features and Principles Lars Gorton 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….…. 62 1.1 General Background ……………………………………………………… 62 1.2 Some Contractual Points …………..……………………………………... 62 1.3 Frame Agreements ………………………………………………………... 64 1.4 Some General Points Related to Distributorship Agreements and Volume Contracts ………………………………………. 66 1.5 Some Further Overriding Points ……………………………………….…. 67 2 Contract Forms ………………………………………………………………… 68 3 Law, Contract and Terminology ……………………………………………… 69 4 The SMC Rules on Volume Contracts ……………………………………..…. 70 5 Characteristics of COA’s ……………………………………………………… 71 6 The Generic Nature of the COA ………………………………………………. 72 7 Some of the Parameters of the COA ………………………...……………….. 76 7.1 The Ships Involved Under the Volume Contract ………………………… 76 7.2 Time Elements in Connection with COA’s ………………………………. 76 7.3 Cargo and Cargo Quantity and Planning of Voyages ………………….… 77 8 Breach and Consequences of Breach …………………………………………. 78 8.1 Generally, Best Efforts and Cooperation …………………………………. 78 8.2 Consequences of the Owners’s Breach …………………………………... 78 8.3 Consequences of the Charterer’s Breach …………………………………. 78 9 Some Comparisons with Distributorship Agreements in English Law ….…. 78 10 Some COA Cases Involving “Evenly spread” ……………………………….. 82 10.1 “Evenly spread” …………………………………………………………... 82 10.2 Mitigation of Damages …………………………………………………… 85 11 Freight, Demurrage and Similar ……………………………………………… 88 11.1 General Points ………..…………………………………………………... 88 11.2 Freight Level ……………………………………………………………..
  • Singapore Court of Appeal Clarifies Requirements on Execution of Deeds

    Singapore Court of Appeal Clarifies Requirements on Execution of Deeds

    CASEWATCH MARCH 2021 Singapore Court of Appeal Clarifies Requirements on Execution of Deeds The Singapore Court of Appeal has affirmed that sealing remains a key requisite for the execution of a deed, which is valid by being “signed, sealed and delivered”: Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin and another matter [2020] SGCA 89 (“Lim Zhipeng”). Our Comments Lim Zhipeng is significant as the Court of Appeal has clarified that sealing remains a crucial requirement for construing that a deed has been validly executed, and notwithstanding developments in the common law that have expanded the scenarios under which a document has been proved to be executed under seal, the court will look beyond the words of the document referring to it as having been sealed. While a seal may not need to take the form of wax (as was historically used) or the circular wafer seal commonly used nowadays, the Court of Appeal has held that there must be evidence of a party’s intention in sealing the document beyond using in the document the words “executed as a deed” and the parties’ signing next to the words “signed, sealed and delivered”. In Lim Zhipeng, the Court of Appeal explored cases where the requirement of sealing was satisfied by green ribbon attached to a document evidencing where a physical seal should have been together with certificates certifying the document was a deed and a printed circle with the letters ‘L.S.’ within it countersigned by the executing party, which evidenced parties’ intention to seal the document they were signing. In the modern day, a physical manifestation of a seal could be represented by an electronic red seal similar to the circular wafer seal commonly stuck onto documents to meet the requirements of sealing.
  • Law Reform Commission of British Columbia Report on Deeds and Seals

    Law Reform Commission of British Columbia Report on Deeds and Seals

    LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT ON DEEDS AND SEALS LRC 96 JUNE, 1988 The Law Reform Commission of British Columbia was established by the Law Reform Commis- sion Act in 1969 and began functioning in 1970. The Commissioners are: ARTHUR L. CLOSE, Chairman HON. RONALD I. CHEFFINS, Q.C., Vice-Chairman MARY V. NEWBURY LYMAN R. ROBINSON, Q.C. PETER T. BURNS, Q.C. Thomas G. Anderson is Counsel to the Commission. J. Bruce McKinnon, Deborah M. Cumberford and Monika Gehlen are Legal Research Officers to the Commission. Sharon St. Michael is Secretary to the Commission Text processing and technical copy preparation by Linda Grant. The Commission offices are located at Suite 601, Chancery Place, 865 Hornby St., Vancouver, BC V6Z 2H4. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Law Reform Commission of British Columbia Report on deeds and seals “LRC 96" Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-7718-8679-9 1. Deeds - British Columbia. 2. Seals (Law) - British Columbia. I. Title DEB231.A72L37 1988 346.711'02 C88-092150-1 Table of Contents I. DEEDS AND SEALS 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Background to the Report 2 C. A Note on Terminology 2 D. Overview of the Report 2 E. The Working Paper 2 II. HISTORICAL NOTE 3 A. Introduction 3 B. Execution of Documents and Literacy 3 C. Actions of Covenant 4 D. Assumpsit and the Decline of Covenant 5 E. Covenant Today 5 III. THE MAKING OF A DEED 7 A. Introduction 7 B. Form and Material Substance 7 1. Introduction 7 2. The Need for an Attachment, Mark or Impression 7 3.
  • Shipbroking and Chartering Practice

    Shipbroking and Chartering Practice

    CONTENTS PAGE Preface v Introduction vii List of Figures xix Bibliography xxi CHAPTER 1. THE FREIGHT MARKET 1 The dry cargo market 2 The bulk and 'tweendecker market 2 The container market 4 The ro/ro market 5 The liner market 6 The small ship market 6 Special markets 7 Heavy-lift carriers 7 Barges and pontoons 7 Tugs 8 The tanker market 8 The "combos" 10 The reefer market 10 The car carrier market 12 The passenger market 13 The sale and purchase market 13 Freight derivatives 14 CHAPTER 2. THE STATE OF THE MARKET 17 CHAPTER 3. SHIPOWNING CONDITIONS AND MARKET ACTIVITIES 23 Materials administration in shipping 26 CHAPTER 4. INFORMATION CHANNELS 29 Information network and exchange 29 Order 29 Positions 31 Market reports 32 Freight negotiations 32 General information Information centres The Baltic Exchange 33 Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers 34 BIMCO 34 Information network Information coverage 3 7 Means of communication ->v The time factor 39 The role of the broker and the agent 40 Shipbrokers 41 Sale and purchase broker 44 Port agents 44 Liner agents 44 Brokers and agents connected with owners 45 Brokerage 45 Insurance for intermediaries 47 CHAPTER 5. MARKETING 49 Attitudes in negotiation 49 Marketing and relation to the customer 50 Organization of a shipping office 54 CHAPTER 6. SALES CONTRACT, CARRIAGE AND BILL OF LADING 57 Sales contract, financing, carriage 57 The sales contract is the basic agreement in the export transaction 57 Incoterms 58 "The sea transport chain" 59 Risk, cost and liability distribution between the different
  • Eidas Regulation Questions & Answers

    Eidas Regulation Questions & Answers

    eIDAS Regulation Questions & Answers on rules applicable to Trust Services as of 1 July 2016 The eIDAS Regulation (Regulation (EU) N°910/2014) on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (eIDAS Regulation) adopted by the co-legislators on 23 July 2014 is a milestone as it provides a predictable regulatory environment for electronic identification and trust services, including electronic signatures, seals, time stamps, registered delivery and website authentication. As of 1 July 2016, the provisions applicable to trust services apply directly in the 28 Member States. This means that trust services under eIDAS are no longer regulated by national laws. As a result, the qualified trust services are recognised independently of the Member State where the Qualified Trust Service Provider is established or where the specific qualified trust service is offered. What’s new? What changes with regard to the former eSignature Directive? What must be done at national level? How does it impact market operators? How does it benefit the users (citizens, businesses and public administrations)? What has the Commission done to facilitate the switchover? These questions and many others have been asked along the road since the adoption. We have compiled this Q&A document to help those of you who need to fully understand the new legal framework in order to implement it or reap the benefits of electronic transactions, as well as those of you who are curious about the Regulation’s various implications. I. What is new? How will the legal effect of electronic signature change under eIDAS (compared to the regime under the eSignature Directive) as from 1 July 2016? Since 1 July 2016, when the trust services’ provisions under the eIDAS Regulation entered into application, an electronic signature can only be used by a natural person to “sign”, i.e.
  • Seals: the Power That Drips from Red Wax

    Seals: the Power That Drips from Red Wax

    Seals: The Power That Drips from Red Wax By Albert S. Frank, LL.B. The sealing wax has been dripped onto the large, beautifully handwritten legal document. Now it is time to apply the nobleman’s signet ring to make the impression in the wax that completes the sealing. There – it is done. The document is sealed. The above description is obviously somewhat out of date. Nowadays, few people own a signet ring or other sealing instrument, and hardly anyone drips sealing wax on legal documents. Typically, without any great feeling of ceremony we simply apply a small self-adhesive wax wafer purchased from a stationery store. Is sealing a fading custom, of no real significance? Actually, there is still power in that old red wax. Consideration Putting a promise in writing is not, in itself, enough to make the promise legally binding. For the promise to be binding, the person making the promise usually has to get something in exchange for the promise. That “something” is called “consideration.” The consideration could be something physical, like gold, land, machinery, peppercorns, etc. The consideration could be money. The consideration could be a promise or promises from the other side of the deal. But what if you are not sure that the person making the promise is getting consideration? For example, someone guaranteeing borrowing being done by a friend might not be getting consideration. Here is where sealing comes in. A sealed document is binding by virtue of being a sealed document, whether or not there is any consideration. This can prevent numerous arguments about whether consideration was provided or was adequate.
  • NCDC Electronic Seal Policy

    NCDC Electronic Seal Policy

    ELECTRONIC SEAL POLICY Document Classification: Public Version Number : 1.0 Issue Date: December 01, 2020 Copyright © 2020 National Center for Digital Certification, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This document is intended for use only by the National Center for Digital Certification and authorized Saudi National PKI participants. This document shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purposes without prior consent. NCDC Electronic Seal Policy Table of Contents 1. POLICY STRUCTURE AND DEFINITIONS ..................................................................... 3 1.1 POLICY STRUCTURE ........................................................................................ 3 1.2 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................... 3 2. PURPOSE .............................................................................................................. 3 3. SCOPE .................................................................................................................. 4 4. POLICY.................................................................................................................. 4 5. RELATED NCDC DOCUMENTS ................................................................................ 7 6. COMPLIANCE ......................................................................................................... 7 7. WAIVER CRITERIA .................................................................................................. 7 8.
  • The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form

    The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form

    Fordham Law Review Volume 43 Issue 1 Article 2 1974 The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form Joseph M. Perillo Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Joseph M. Perillo, The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form, 43 Fordham L. Rev. 39 (1974). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol43/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Statute of Frauds in the Light of the Functions and Dysfunctions of Form Cover Page Footnote Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law. The author wishes to express his appreciation for the assistance given him by the Institute of Comparative Law, University of Florence, where this Article was written. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol43/iss1/2 THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS IN THE LIGHT OF THE FUNCTIONS AND DYSFUNCTIONS OF FORM JOSEPH 3f. PERILLO* I. INTRODUCTION T RUMPET flourishes and drum rolls are unlikely to sound in village squares on April 16, 1977,' to commemorate the third centennial of the enactment of sections 42 and 173 of the Statute of Frauds.
  • Laytime Definitions for Charter Parties

    Laytime Definitions for Charter Parties

    LAYTIME DEFINITIONS FOR CHARTER PARTIES PREAMBLE Words, phrases, acronyms and abbreviations (“Words and Phrases”) used in a Charter Party shall be defined, for the purposes of Laytime only, in accordance with the corresponding Words and Phrases set out below, when any or all such definitions are expressly incorporated into the Charter Party. "Charter Party" shall include any form of contract of carriage or affreightment including contracts evidenced by bills of lading. Singular/Plural The singular includes the plural and vice versa as the context admits or requires. List of Definitions 1. PORT shall mean any area where vessels load or discharge cargo and shall include, but not be limited to, berths, wharves, anchorages, buoys and offshore facilities as well as places outside the legal, fiscal or administrative area where vessels are ordered to wait for their turn no matter the distance from that area. 2. BERTH shall mean the specific place where the Vessel is to load or discharge and shall include, but not be limited to, any wharf, anchorage, offshore facility or other location used for that purpose. 3. REACHABLE ON ARRIVAL shall mean that the charterer undertakes that an available loading or discharging Berth be provided to the Vessel on arrival at the Port which the Vessel can reach safely without delay. 4. ALWAYS ACCESSIBLE shall mean that the charterer undertakes that an available loading or discharging Berth be provided to the Vessel on arrival at the Port which the Vessel can reach safely without delay. The charterer additionally undertakes that the Vessel will be able to depart safely from the Berth and without delay at any time before, during or on completion of loading or discharging.