Vineyard Managers and Researchers Seek Sustainable Solutions for Mealybugs, a Changing Pest Complex

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vineyard Managers and Researchers Seek Sustainable Solutions for Mealybugs, a Changing Pest Complex UC Agriculture & Natural Resources California Agriculture Title Vineyard managers and researchers seek sustainable solutions for mealybugs, a changing pest complex Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00w2p416 Journal California Agriculture, 62(4) ISSN 0008-0845 Authors Daane, Kent M Cooper, Monica L Triapitsyn, Serquei V et al. Publication Date 2008-10-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California REVIEW ARTICLE ▼ Vineyard managers and researchers seek sustainable solutions for mealybugs, a changing pest complex ▼ by Kent M. Daane, Monica L. Cooper, In an uncontrolled vine mealybug Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Vaughn M. Walton, infestation in a San Glenn Y. Yokota, David R. Haviland, Joaquin Valley raisin- Walt J. Bentley, Kris E. Godfrey grape vineyard, mealybug and honey- and Lynn R. Wunderlich dew accumulate on the fruit, canes and leaves. Mealybugs have become increasingly important vineyard pests — a result of their direct damage to the vine, their role in transmitting grapevine leafroll viruses, and the costs for their control. Numerous mealybug species are found in vineyards, and each has ▼ An obscure mealy- different biological traits that af- bug infestation fect sustainable control options. We in a Central Coast wine-grape vineyard review the mealybug pests and their shows growth of sooty molds that are natural enemies to provide some often associated with clarifi cation about current trends in mealybug excretion (honeydew), espe- biological control tactics and needed cially in cooler grape directions for future work. regions. ver the past 100 years, a series of different mealybug species have beenO found in California vineyards, with fi ve species currently causing damage and a sixth posing a threat. Mealybugs have needlelike mouth- specimens collected on coastal buck- Mealybug pests parts that feed on the plant’s phloem, wheat in California in 1900 and was which contains the nutrients needed Most of California’s vineyard mealy- the only vineyard mealybug thought to for mealybug development. As mealy- bugs are invasive species — although be native to North America (Miller et bugs digest their food, they excrete a some of them have been here for nearly al. 1984) until the arrival of Ferrisia gilli sugar-rich fl uid called “honeydew.” 100 years. For newly invasive species, Gullan. Grape mealybugs can be found All vineyard mealybugs can feed on eradication should be the fi rst response. throughout California’s Central Valley the vine’s trunk, canes, leaves or fruit, If eradication is not feasible, then an and coastal grape regions, as well as and some species feed on vine roots. integrated program that includes clas- in Oregon and Washington vineyards. Crop loss occurs when mealybugs sical biological controls should be con- Typically, there are two generations per infest fruit or excrete honeydew that sidered. For native mealybug species, year (Geiger and Daane 2001). For most covers fruit and leaves, often result- resident natural enemies often provide of the year, grape mealybugs are found ing in sooty mold growth, defoliation substantial control or can be manipu- under the bark, but during the second and sunburned fruit. Continuous high lated to improve their effectiveness. generation (beginning in June) they levels of infestation over successive The history of each mealybug species in move into grape clusters, especially years may also lead to the deteriora- California and its distinctive biological clusters in contact with the trunk or tion of vines. And many mealybug characteristics affect the level of eco- spurs. The population overwinters as species transmit viruses such as grape- nomic damage and potential effective- eggs or small nymphs under the bark, vine leafroll (see sidebar, page 174). ness of biological controls. with a required diapause that helps to However, these mealybug pests can be Pseudococcus. The grape mealybug, synchronize generations each year. controlled, to some extent, by natural Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrhorn), is one The longtailed mealybug, Pseudo- enemies that are often present in sus- of the oldest California vineyard pests coccus longispinus (Targioni Tozzetti) is tainable management programs. (Essig 1914). It was fi rst described from believed to be of Austro-Oriental origin http://CaliforniaAgriculture.ucop.edu • OctOBER–DEcEMBER 2008 167 A B Africa, South Africa, Argentina, the Middle East and Mexico. In California, crawlers blown by wind or carried by animals and farm machinery aid its spread. Infested nursery stock (Haviland et al. 2005) and pomace from the wine-grape crush (see sidebar, page 172) can also harbor this pest. Vine mealybug has a number of traits that make it particularly dam- C D aging and difficult to control. Most notably, there are four to seven annual generations in much of California’s grape-growing regions, resulting in rapid population growth. Vine mealy- bug also feeds on all parts of the vine throughout the season, resulting in a portion of the population protected under the bark. It can feed on a num- ber of plant species; however, while it is common in Europe on fig Ficus( sp.), Common mealybug species in vineyards there are no reports on this host from E are (A) grape mealybug, with orange-to- red ostiolar secretion near the head and California. The closely related citrus anus (the fluid is often a defensive tactic to mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso), has ward off predators); (B) obscure mealybug; been found on vines but has never been (C) longtailed mealybug; (D) vine mealybug recorded as an economically important approaching a grape berry; and (E) Gill’s mealybug with glasslike rods brushed pest in vineyards. aside to show adult wax pattern. Ferrisia. Ferrisia gilli Gullan is a close relative of the striped mealybug (F. virgata Cockerell), which is probably native to southeastern North America. In fact, until recently the California population was considered to be the (Ben-Dov 1994). This cosmopolitan spe- Biological traits that make obscure striped mealybug, but differences in cies has been resident in California since mealybug more damaging than grape its adult morphology and economic at least 1933 and is best known as a pest mealybug are that it readily feeds on importance in pistachios and almonds of ornamental plants. Longtailed mealy- leaves (causing leaf damage and rain- prompted studies that led to its new bug has been limited to Central Coast ing honeydew down onto grape clus- species description in 2003 (Gullan et vineyards, where it has three generations ters), it can survive on common weeds al. 2003). Damaging vineyard popula- yearly. Unlike the other Pseudococcus spe- such as malva and burclover (Walton tions have only recently been found in cies discussed, longtailed mealybugs give and Pringle 2004b), it has three or four the Sierra foothills. Because F. gilli — birth to live crawlers (1st-instar mealy- overlapping generations per year, and commonly called Gill’s mealybug, after bugs, which disperse before they settle it excretes more honeydew. It is limited, Raymond Gill — is so new to scientists, and feed) rather than depositing eggs. however, to the cooler grape-growing research on its seasonal occurrence The origin of the obscure mealybug, regions, and is most commonly found in has, to date, only been conducted on Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret), is un- Central Coast vineyards. pistachios grown in the Central Valley known, and both Australia and South Planococcus. The vine mealy- (Haviland et al. 2006). There, the mealy- America have been suggested. While bug, Planococcus ficus (Signoret), is bug has three annual generations. In known to be in North America since a relatively new invasive species to fall, adult females produce crawlers that the early 1900s, its history is poorly Californian and Mexican vineyards overwinter in protected crevices of the documented due in part to earlier taxo- (Daane et al. 2006). In 1994, it was trunk and scaffolding branches. During nomic confusion — it is a close relative found in Coachella Valley table grapes, bud-break, the overwintering nymphs of the grape mealybug and was often although it probably entered the state migrate to buds to feed; they become misidentified (Miller et al. 1984). The years before. Vine mealybug has al- adults between late May and mid-June obscure mealybug is primarily a pest of ways been associated with vineyards and give live birth to crawlers, the first ornamental plants but is also found in and was first identified as a new spe- of two in-season generations. Currently, coastal vineyards, especially in associa- cies in the Crimea on grapes in 1868. It studies are ongoing in El Dorado tion with the Argentine ant, Linepithema has since spread and is now a key pest County to determine this mealybug’s humile (Mayr) (Phillips and Sherk 1991). in the vineyards of Europe, northern seasonal occurrence on grapes. 168 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 62, NUMBER 4 Maconellicoccus. The pink hibiscus A B mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), is an excellent example of an in- vasive species that presents a significant threat to California grapes but has been limited by a successful classical biologi- cal control program (Roltsch et al. 2006). Pink hibiscus mealybug is probably native to Southeast Asia or Australia. It invaded Egypt in 1912, Hawaii in 1984, the Caribbean islands in 1994, Florida in 2002, and reached northern Mexico C D and Southern California in 2003. It has a wide host range of more than 200 plant species. Under optimum temperature conditions, this mealybug can have explosive populations with more than 600 eggs per ovisac and up to 15 genera- tions per year. Natural enemies Hundreds of natural enemies can Common mealybug predators include lady beetles. (A) An adult Scymnus species feeds on a attack mealybugs, making this brief grape mealybug. (B) A large mealybug destroyer larva near the smaller obscure mealybug; review incomplete. Here, we catalog the larvae of many of these lady beetle species have waxy filaments to mimic mealybugs and the more common natural enemies and reduce interference from mealybug-tending ants.
Recommended publications
  • International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 424 Poster Presentations ______
    POSTER PRESENTATIONS ______________________________________________________________ Poster Presentations 423 IMPROVEMENT OF RELEASE METHOD FOR APHIDOLETES APHIDIMYZA (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) BASED ON ECOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL STUDIES Junichiro Abe and Junichi Yukawa Entomological Laboratory, Kyushu University, Japan ABSTRACT. In many countries, Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani) has been used effectively as a biological control agent against aphids, particularly in greenhouses. In Japan, A. aphidimyza was reg- istered as a biological control agent in April 1999, and mass-produced cocoons have been imported from The Netherlands and United Kingdom since mass-rearing methods have not yet been estab- lished. In recent years, the effect of imported A. aphidimyza on aphid populations was evaluated in greenhouses at some Agricultural Experiment Stations in Japan. However, no striking effect has been reported yet from Japan. The failure of its use in Japan seems to be caused chiefly by the lack of detailed ecological or behavioral information of A. aphidimyza. Therefore, we investigated its ecological and behavioral attributes as follows: (1) the survival of pupae in relation to the depth of pupation sites; (2) the time of adult emergence in response to photoperiod during the pupal stage; (3) the importance of a hanging substrate for successful mating; and (4) the influence of adult size and nutrient status on adult longev- ity and fecundity. (1) A commercial natural enemy importer in Japan suggests that users divide cocoons into groups and put each group into a plastic container filled with vermiculite to a depth of 100 mm. However, we believe this is too deep for A. aphidimyza pupae, since under natural conditions mature larvae spin their cocoons in the top few millimeters to a maxmum depth of 30 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Platygastrinae and Sceliotrachelinae from Rainforest
    Species of Platygastrinae and Sceliotrachelinae from rainforest canopies in Tanzania, with keys to the Afrotropical species of Amblyaspis, Inostemma, Leptacis, Platygaster and Synopeas (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae) Peter Neerup Buhl The platygastrid diversity from a canopy fogging experiment in Tanzania is assessed, a total of about 1140 specimens in 141 species was found. Forty species new to science are described: Allotropa canopyana, A. fusca, Leptacis acuticlava, L. dendrophila, L. dilatispina, L. ioannoui, L. johnsoni, L. kryi, L. laevipleura, L. latipetiolata, L. mckameyi, L. papei, L. piestopleuroides, L. popovicii, L. pronotata, Parabaeus austini, P. brevicornis, P. papei, Platygaster hamadryas, Pl. kwamgumiensis, Pl. leptothorax, Pl. mazumbaiensis, Pl. nielseni, Pl. sonnei, Pl. ultima, Pl. vertexialis, Synopeas acutanguliceps, S. canopyanum, S. ciliarissimum, S. dentilamellatum, S. dorsale, S. fredskovae, S. glabratum, S. gnom, S. laeviventre, S. lineae, S. longiceps, S. mazumbaiense, S. semihyalinum, and S. verrucosum. Keys are given to nearly all known Afrotropical species of Amblyaspis Förster, 1856, Inostemma Haliday, 1833, Leptacis Förster, 1856, Platygaster Latreille, 1809 and Synopeas Förster, 1856. Peter Neerup Buhl, Troldhøjvej 3, DK-3310 Ølsted, Denmark. [email protected] Introduction The wasp subfamilies Platygastrinae and Scelio- The Eastern Arc Mountains are renown in Africa trachelinae consist of parasitoids, the hosts of the for high concentrations of endemic species of ani- former being especially gall midges. They are mostly mals and plants. Thirteen separate mountain blocks very small (1–2 mm), black, weakly shining wasps comprise the Eastern Arc, supporting around 3300 with elbowed antennae that have at the most 8 flag- km2 of sub-montane, montane and upper montane ellomeres in the antenna (sometimes fewer, espe- forest.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 March 2013, 381 P
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/273257107 Mason, P. G., D. R. Gillespie & C. Vincent (Eds.) 2013. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 381 p. CONFERENCE PAPER · MARCH 2013 DOWNLOADS VIEWS 626 123 3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Peter Mason Charles Vincent Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 96 PUBLICATIONS 738 CITATIONS 239 PUBLICATIONS 1,902 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Charles Vincent Retrieved on: 13 August 2015 The correct citation of this work is: Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.). 2013. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 380 p. Proceedings of the 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile March 4-8, 2013 Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.) 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile, March 4-8, 2013 PREFACE The Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, held in Pucón – Chile, continues the series of international symposia on the biological control of arthropods organized every four years. The first meeting was in Hawaii – USA during January 2002, followed by the Davos - Switzerland meeting during September 2005, and the Christchurch – New Zealand meeting during February 2009. The goal of these symposia is to create a forum where biological control researchers and practitioners can meet and exchange information, to promote discussions of up to date issues affecting biological control, particularly pertaining to the use of parasitoids and predators as biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Platygastridae)
    Graellsia, 57(2): 141-153 (2001) TEN NEW SPECIES OF PLATYGASTRID WASPS FROM CENTRAL SPAIN (HYMENOPTERA, PLATYGASTRIDAE) P. N. Buhl * ABSTRACT Ten new species from two localities near Madrid are described and figured, and their affinities are discussed. The species new to science are: Allotropa antennalis, Amblyas- pis dolichosoma, Inostemma nievesaldreyi, Isocybus dulcinea, Leptacis hispanica, Pies- topleura garridoi, P. nievesi, Platygaster reyi, Synopeas gastralis, and S. madridiana. Keywords: Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, new species, central Spain. RESUMEN Diez nuevas especies de platigástridos del centro de España (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae) Se describen e ilustran 10 nuevas especies procedentes de dos localidades próximas a Madrid, asimismo se discuten sus afinidades. Las diez nuevas especie son: Allotropa antennalis, Amblyaspis dolichosoma, Inostemma nievesaldreyi, Isocybus dulcinea, Lep- tacis hispanica, Piestopleura garridoi, P. nievesi, Platygaster reyi, Synopeas gastralis y S. madridiana. Palabras clave: Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, especies nuevas, centro de España. Introduction just about 100 species of Platygastridae are known from Spain. In connection with a faunistic survey (Buhl & All types are preserved in the Museo Nacional Nieves-Aldrey, in press) of the localities El Pardo de Ciencias Naturales in Madrid, except a paratype and El Ventorrillo near Madrid, the Malaise and of each species (were possible) which is deposited yellow pan trap material of Platygastridae (about in the Zoological Museum, University of Copenha- 3300 specimens) was sent to the author for identifi- gen. For an overview of the rest of the material with cation. At least ten species new to science appea- a discussion of faunistics, cf. the paper referred to red, described below. This reflects the hitherto low above.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol Science and Technology
    This article was downloaded by:[USDA National Agricultural Library] On: 27 March 2008 Access Details: [subscription number 777121053] Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713409232 No-choice host range tests for Allotropa sp. near mecrida, a parasitoid of the pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) William J. Roltsch a; Lawrence R. Ertle b; Dale E. Meyerdirk c a California Department of Food & Agriculture, Biological Control Program, Sacramento, CA, USA b US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beneficial Insects Research Laboratory, Newark, DE, USA c US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Pest Detection and Management Programs, MD, USA Online Publication Date: 01 January 2007 To cite this Article: Roltsch, William J., Ertle, Lawrence R. and Meyerdirk, Dale E. (2007) 'No-choice host range tests for Allotropa sp. near mecrida, a parasitoid of the pink hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)', Biocontrol Science and Technology, 17:9, 977 - 981 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/09583150701661661 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150701661661 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control September 12-16, 2005 Mark S. Hoddle, Compiler University of California, Riverside U.S.A. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2005-08 Department of Service September 2005 Agriculture Volume II Papers were submitted in an electronic format, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Any references to pesticides appearing in these papers does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement
    FOREST SERVICE ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR THREATENED, ENDANGERED AND PROPOSED SPECIES AND SENSITIVE SPECIES November 2000 (Amended) After a thorough review, we have determined that all of the alternatives analyzed for this biological evaluation have the same overall determination of potential effects to threatened, endangered, and proposed species, and designated and proposed critical habitat. It is our determination that: The alternatives analyzed in this biological evaluation may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect threatened or endangered species or adversely modify designated critical habitat, and are not likely to jeopardize proposed species or adversely modify proposed critical habitat. Furthermore, these alternatives may beneficially affect threatened, endangered, and proposed species and critical habitat. We have further determined for Regional Forester designated sensitive species that: The alternatives analyzed in this biological evaluation may impact individuals, but are not likely to cause a trend towards federal listing or a loss of viability for any sensitive species. Furthermore, these alternatives may beneficially impact sensitive species and their habitats. /s/ Seona Brown /s/ Ron Archuleta . SEONA BROWN RON ARCHULETA EIS TEAM BIOLOGIST EIS TEAM BIOLOGIST DATE 11/13/2000 DATE 11/13/2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Plasmopara Viticola) G
    IOBC / WPRS Working Group “Integrated Protection and Production in Viticulture” OILB / SROP Groupe de Travail “Lutte Intégrée et Production Intégrée en Viticulture” Proceedings of the Meeting Compte Rendu de la Réunion at / à Volos (Hellas) March 18-22, 2003 Edited by Carlo Lozzia IOBC wprs Bulletin Bulletin OILB srop Vol. 26 (8) 2003 The IOBC/WPRS Bulletin is published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Le Bulletin OILB/SROP est publié par l‘Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Intégrée contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, section Regionale Ouest Paléarctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright: IOBC/WPRS 2003 The Publication Commission of the IOBC/WPRS: Horst Bathon Luc Tirry Federal Biological Research Center University of Gent for Agriculture and Forestry (BBA) Laboratory of Agrozoology Institute for Biological Control Department of Crop Protection Heinrichstr. 243 Coupure Links 653 D-64287 Darmstadt (Germany) B-9000 Gent (Belgium) Tel +49 6151 407-225, Fax +49 6151 407-290 Tel +32-9-2646152, Fax +32-9-2646239 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: luc.tirry@ rug.ac.be Address General Secretariat: INRA – Centre de Recherches de Dijon Laboratoire de recherches sur la Flore Pathogène dans le Sol 17, Rue Sully, BV 1540 F-21034 DIJON CEDEX France ISBN 92-9067-156-2 Editorial The meeting that was held in Volos, supported by the Benaki Institute, has ratified the 30 years of the working groups that today have become Integrated Protection and Production in Viticulture. It is my intention to remind and thank all those who, with their work, have contributed to the birth, the development and the extraordinary vitality of this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Management in Vineyards
    Arthropod Management in Vineyards Noubar J. Bostanian • Charles Vincent Rufus Isaacs Editors Arthropod Management in Vineyards: Pests, Approaches, and Future Directions Editors Dr. Noubar J. Bostanian Dr. Charles Vincent Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Horticultural Research and Horticultural Research and Development Center Development Center 430 Gouin Blvd. 430 Gouin Blvd. Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada Dr. Rufus Isaacs Department of Entomology Michigan State University East Lansing, MI, USA ISBN 978-94-007-4031-0 ISBN 978-94-007-4032-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4032-7 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012939840 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerophyllum Tenax) General Technical Report Susan Hummel, Sarah Foltz-Jordan, and Sophia Polasky PNW-GTR-864
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural and Cultural Forest Service History of Beargrass Pacific Northwest Research Station (Xerophyllum tenax) General Technical Report Susan Hummel, Sarah Foltz-Jordan, and Sophia Polasky PNW-GTR-864 October 2012 The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, status as a parent (in education and training programs and activities), because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or retaliation. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs or activities). If you require this information in alternative format (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (Voice or TDD). If you require information about this program, activity, or facility in a language other than English, contact the agency office responsible for the program or activity, or any USDA office. To file a complaint alleging discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call toll free, (866) 632-9992 (Voice).
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report
    CDFA PLANT HEALTH & PEST PREVENTION SERVICES DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT 2005 CHOWCHILLA RIVER Successful hydrilla eradication PHOTO: Florence Maly -- IPC In Memoriam 2005 1986 David Godfrey Ross O'Connell Program Supervisor IV Associate Agricultural Biologist Pest Exclusion Integrated Pest Control 33 Years of Service 27 Years of Service JULY 23, 1948 -- APRIL 11, 2006 SEPTEMBER 7, 1952 -- OCTOBER 16, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services Administration...2 Permits and Regulations…………………………………………….3 Environmental Compliance………………………………………….4 Branches in Plant Health…………………………………………….5 Pest Exclusion Branch………………………………………….…6 Interior Pest Exclusion…………………………………………….…6 Exterior Pest Exclusion…………………………………………….31 Nursery, Seed and Cotton…………………………………………39 Pest Detection and Emergency Projects……………….……..49 Exotic Fruit Flies……………………………………………………..50 Gypsy Moth…………………………………………………………..59 Japanese Beetle……………………………………………………..62 Red Imported Fire Ant……………………………………………....65 Surveys........................................................................................70 Integrated Pest Control Branch………………………………….74 Beet Curly Top Virus…………………………………………………74 Biological Control……………………………………………………..78 Hydrilla…………………………………………………………………85 Noxious Weeds……………………………………………………….90 Pink Bollworm and Other Cotton Pests…………………………….93 Vertebrate Pest Control………………………………………………95 Weed Management Areas……………………………………………97 Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch…………………………………….99 1 Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services Administration All images from
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Platygastridae: Sceliotrachelinae)
    MORPHOLOGY,HISTOLOGY, AND FINE STRUCTURE Morphology and Development of Immature Stages of Fidiobia dominica (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae: Sceliotrachelinae) 1 2 2 JOSEP-ANTON JACAS, JORGE E. PEN˜ A, AND R. E. DUNCAN Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 100(3): 413Ð417 (2007) ABSTRACT The external morphology and development of immature stages of Fidiobia dominica Evans & Pen˜ a (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae), a Neotropical solitary endoparasitoid of the eggs of Diaprepes spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), are reported. This species behaves as a solitary idiobiont endoparasitoid. It has a stalked egg and two instars. The Þrst instar is cyclopoid and seven-segmented, whereas the second instar is hymenopteriform and 11-segmented. Mandibulae are conspicuous in both instars. On completion of the larval development, the host egg turns amber transparent, making parasitized eggs easily recognizable. The pupa is exarate. F. dominica is a protandrous species and once emerged, males help females to emerge. KEY WORDS Diaprepes abbreviatus, biological control, egg parasitoid Fidiobia dominica Evans & Pen˜ a (Hymenoptera: (Clausen 1940, Askew 1971, Masner 1995, Austin et al. Platygastridae) is a solitary egg endoparasitoid that 2005). The genera of this subfamily that parasitize attacks at least two species of root weevils, Diaprepes coleopteran eggs are solitary idiobiont endoparasi- doublerii Gue´rin and Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.) (Co- toids and are thought to develop in a way similar to leoptera: Curculionidae), indigenous to the Carib- that of Scelionidae (Masner 1995). Although the Þrst bean region (Evans and Pen˜ a 2005). D. abbreviatus instar of some platygastrids is more or less hymenop- was introduced into Florida in 1964 (Woodruff 1968) teriform, Þrst instars of many species are extraordinary and since has become a serious pest of citrus through- in appearance and superÞcially resemble cyclopoid out much of central and southern Florida, and it is copepods (Clausen 1940, Askew 1971).
    [Show full text]