FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 69
Friday, April 11, 1969 • Washington, D.C.
Pages 6371-6410
Agencies in this issue— Civil Aeronautics Board Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Defense Department Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Food and Drug Administration General Services Administration Housing and Urban Development Department Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Monetary Offices National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Park Service Public Health Service Securities and Exchange Commission Transportation Department Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Volume 81
UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE
[90th Cong., 1st Sess.]
Contains laws and concurrent resolu of prior laws affected, a numerical tions enacted by the Congress during listing of bills enacted into public and 1967, reorganization plans, the twenty- private law, and a guide to the legis fifth amendment to the Constitution, and Presidential proclamations. Also lative history of bills enacted into included are: a subject index, tables public law.
Price: $9.00
Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration
Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402
Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or FEDERALWREGISTER on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (m ail address National Area Code 202 iss« Phone 962-8626 ¡Junto Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 2 0408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Admin istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (1 5 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cents for each additional group of 40 pages, as actually bound). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Docum ents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the C o d e o f F e d e r a l R e g u l a t i o n s , which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The C o d e o f F e d e r a l R e g u l a t i o n s is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F e d e r a l R e g is t e r issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal R egister or the Code of F ederal Regulations. Contents
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU See Consumer and Marketing Notices Notices Service. Hearings, etc.: Wyoming; modification of graz Jackman, David, Jr., et al------6404 ing district______6399 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Superior Oil Co. et al------6404 MARITIME .ADMINISTRATION Notices FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Hearings, etc.: Notices Flying Tiger additional points— 6400 Rules and Regulations Bank of America National Trust International Air Transport As Prohibited trade practices: and Savings Association; ap sociation ------6400 Opportunity Publishing Co------6393 proval of applicant as trustee______6399 Mohawk Airlines, Inc------6400 Woronoff, Sydell, and Sydell Pacific Southwest Airlines------6400 Crowns ______6393 MONETARY OFFICES COMMERCE DEPARTMENT FOOD AND DRUG Rules and Regulations Silver coins; authorization of ex See Maritime Administration. ADMINISTRATION port of silver dollars in un Proposed Rule Making limited amounts______6393 CONSUMER AND MARKETING Color additives; denial of proposed SERVICE regulations ------6396 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND Proposed Rule Making GENERAL SERVICES SPACE ADMINISTRATION Potatoes, Irish; importation------6396 ADMINISTRATION Rules and Regulations Administrative authority a n d CUSTOMS BUREAU Notices policy; execution of certificates Rules and Regulations Authority delegation; Secretary of full faith and credit______6393 of Agriculture______6406 Hours of business of customs of fices ______{-■------6375 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Notices DEFENSE DEPARTMENT WELFARE DEPARTMENT Bighorn Canyon National Rec See Food and Drug Administra Rul es and Regulations reation Area, Montana and tion; Public Health Service. Industrial mobilization production Wyoming; correction of bound planning systems and proce HOUSING AND URBAN ary descriptions______6399 dures ______6375 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FEDERAL AVIATION Notices Rules and Regulations ADMINISTRATION Authority delegations regarding Air pollution; designation of Rules and Regulations housing assistance in Alaska: metropolitan St. Louis inter Assistant Secretary and Deputy state air quality control region Airworthiness directives : Assistant Secretary for Re (Missouri-Illinois) _-r_— ------6394 British Aircraft Corp. airplanes newal and Housing Assist (2 documents)______6375, 6376 ance ______6399 Vickers Viscount airplanes____ 6376 Regional Administrator and SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Control areas, transition area, Deputy Regional* Administra COMMISSION control zone, and reporting tor, Region VI (San Fran Notices points; designation______6376 cisco) ______' 6399 Hearings, etc.: Standard instrument approach Clorox Co______6406 procedures; miscellaneous INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Computer Sciences Corp. and amendments______6377 See Land Management Bureau; Buttes Gas & Oil Co______6406 Proposed Rule Making National Park Service. Georgia Power Co______6407 Airworthiness directive; NAMC Y S -il and YS-11A aircraft____ 6398 INTERSTATE COMMERCE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT COMMISSION See also Federal Aviation Ad FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Rules and Regulations ministration. COMMISSION Car service; Union Pacific Rail Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making road Co. authorized to operate Removal of reservation of au over tracks of Southern Pacific thority regarding civil penal Standard broadcast stations; Co ______6395 ties; Federal Highway Admin Phase monitors, etc.; extensions Notices istrator ______6395 of time (2 documents)______6397 Fourth section applications for TREASURY DEPARTMENT Notices re lie f______6407 Hearings, etc.: Motor carriers: See Customs Bureau; Monetary Offices. Great Southern Broadcasting Temporary authority applica tions *______6407 Co. a n d Hendersonville Transfer proceedings (2 docu WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION Broadcasting Corp., Inc_____ 6402 ments) ______6409 Jaco, Inc., and K A K E -T V and Proposed Rule Making Radio, Inc______6403 LABOR DEPARTMENT Age discrimination in employ Bee Enterprises, Inc______6403 See Wage and Hour Division. ment; exemptions______6396 6373 6374 CONTENTS . List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1969, and specifies how they are affected.
7 CFR 19 CFR 32 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 1 ------6375 200 ------6375 980 ______6396 21 CFR 42 CFR 14 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 8 1 ------6394 39 (3 documents)______6375, 6376 8 ------:T______6396 71------6376 9 7 ______6377 47 CFR 1204 ______!___ 6393 29 CFR P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 73 (2 documents)______6397 3 9 ______6398 850 ______6396 49 CFR 16 CFR 31 CFR 1 ------6395 13 (2 documents)______.6393 8 2 ______6393 1033 ______6395
V 6375 Rules and Regulations
A uthority : The provisions of this Part 200 its interest on all industrial mobilization issued under 5 U.S.C. 301. production planning program matters; Title 19— CUSTOMS DUTIES and (2) assist the DASD(I&L) Materiel § 200.1 Purpose. Chapter I— Bureau of Customs, or his designee concerning program im This part authorizes the publication of provements and changes. Department of the Treasury a single Department of Defense Indus (c) Other participating Federal Agen [T D . 69-95] trial Mobilization Production Planning cies are invited to designate an individ Manual (DoD 4005.3-M)1 containing ual and an alternate to represent their PART 1— g e n e r a l p r o v is io n s supplemental guidance to the policies Agencies’ interests in the program on a Hours of Business of Customs Offices and principles established in DoD Direc basis comparable to those who will rep tive 4005.1, “Department of Defense In resent the Military Departments and the In order to authorize all principal field dustrial Mobilization Production Plan Defense Supply Agency as provided in officers of the Customs Service to excuse ning Program— Limited W ar,” dated paragraph (b) of this section. customs employees from work on State or June 23, 1967,2 governing: M aurice W . R oche, local holidays, without the prior approval (a) Development and maintenance of of a regional commissioner of customs, Director, Correspondence and the industrial production base; and Directives Division, OASD § 1.7(d) of the Customs Regulations is (b) Planning necessary to insure that amended to read as follows: (Administration). the base will be responsive to military [F.R. Doc. 69-4227; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; § 1.7 Hours of business. procurement actions during a Limited 8:45 a.m.] ***** War. § 200.2 Applicability. (d) Each customs office shall be open Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND for the transaction of business on all The provisions of this part and the State and local holidays occurring on DoD M anual1 apply to (a) the Military SPACE days other than Saturdays, Sundays, and Departments and the Defense Supply national holidays. If a State or local holi Agency; (b) other participating Federal Chapter I— Federal Aviation Admin day interferes with the performance, of Agencies; and (c) that portion of the in istration, Department of Transpor work in a customs office by any customs dustrial community which is, or may tation employee or employees, the appropriate become, engaged in planning for the ful principal field officer may excuse such fillment of DoD requirements under the SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT employee or employees from duty without provisions of the DoD Manual.1 [Docket No. 9420; Arndt. 39-748] charge to leave. ~ § 200.3 Responsibilities. PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS (RJS. 251, sec. 624, 46 Stat. 759; 5 U.S.C. 301, (a) The Deputy Assistant Secretary 19 U.S.C. 66, 1624) DIRECTIVES of Defense (Installations and Logistics) This amendment shall become effec for Materiel will: British Aircraft Corp. Model BAC 1—11, tive upon publication in the F ederal (1) Publish and maintain the DoD 203/AE and 204/AF Series Air Register. Industrial Mobilization Production Plan planes [ seal] L ester D. Jo h n s o n , ning Manual (DoD 4005.3-M)1 and will A proposal to amend Part 39 of the Commissioner of Customs. (i) assign functional responsibilities to Federal Aviation Regulations to include participating organizational elements; an airworthiness directive (AD ) requir Approved: April 2,1969. (ii) establish principles and procedural ing replacement of the aluminum re- Eugene T. R ossides, systems governing the operational as fuel/defuel valve housing with a modified Assistant Secretary pects of mobilization production plan stainless steel valve housing on BAC 1-11, of the Treasury. ning; (iii) define terms; (iv) prescribe 203/AE and 204/AF airplanes, was pub DD Forms and instructions for their use; [F.R. Doc. 69-4257; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; lished in 34 F.R. 1956. 8:47 a.m.] (v) specify records to be maintained by Interested persons have been afforded users; (vi) establish security standards an opportunity to participate in the for the protection of planning in process making of the amendment. No objections and planning completed; and were received. Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE (2) Maintain overall surveillance to In consideration of the foregoing, and insure continuous implementation of the pursuant to the authority delegated to Chapter I— Office of the Secretary -provisions of this part and the DoD Man me by the Administrator (14 CFR 11.89), of Defense ual 1 throughout the Department of De § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation fense. Regulations is amended by adding the SUBCHAPTER M— MISCELLANEOUS (b) The Military Departments and following new airworthiness directive: [DoD Instructions 4005.3,12/24/68] the Defense Supply Agency will (1) des B ritish A ircraft Corp. Applies to Model BAC PART 200— INDUSTRIAL MOBILIZA ignate an individual and an alternate 1—11, 203/AE and 204/AF airplanes. TION PRODUCTION PLANNING to act as the single point of contact with Compliance required within the next 2,500 the DASD(I&L) Materiel and represent hours’ time in service after the effective date SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES of this AD, unless already accomplished. To prevent fuel leakage Into the wing cen The Assistant Secretary of Deft 1 Filed as part of original document. Copies (installations and Logistics) has ter section torque box area, replace the available at Government Printing Office aluminum alloy refuel/defuel valve housing Proved the following: (G P O ), Mar. 27,1969. P/N AB 45A101 with modified stainless steel Sec. a Filed as part of original document. Copies valve housing P/N AB 45A1239 in accordance 200.1 Purpose. available at the U.S. Naval Publications and with BAC 1-11 Service Bulletin No. 28-PM f 0.2 Applicability. Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, Philadel 924 or later ARB-approved issue or FAA- 200.3 Responsibilities. phia, Pa. 19120. approved equivalent.
FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6376 RULES AND REGULATIONS
This amendment becomes effective an airworthiness directive requiring in Since these amendments are in the May 11, 1969. stallation of interference brackets and interest of safety, the Administrator has (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act retaining cables to the detachable clip determined that notice and public proce of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423); sec. assemblies at the fire extinguishing bot dure thereon is impracticable, and good 6 (c), Department of Transportation Aot (49 tleneck at the inner and outer nacelle cause exists to make them effective U.S.C. 1655(c)) mountings on Vickers Viscount Model immediately. Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 4, 744, 745D, and 810 Series airplanes, was In consideration of the foregoing, Part 1969. published in 34 F.R. 1956. 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is R . S. S l if f , Interested persons have been afforded amended effective 0901 G.m.t., April 11, Acting Director, an opportunity to participate in the mak 1969, as hereinafter set forth. Flight Standards Service. ing of the amendment. No objections 1. In § 71.163 (34 F.R. 4549) the fol were received. lowing are added: [F.R. Doc. 69-4233; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 8:45 a.m.] In consideration of the foregoing, and Fairbanks/Ol ik t o k , Alaska pursuant to the authority delegated to From the Fairbanks, Alaska, LF RR, 48 me by the Administrator (14 CFR 11.89), nautical miles, 12 AGL, 65 MSL Chandalar, [Docket No. 9418; Amdt. 39-749] § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Alaska, RBN (lat. 6 7 °3 0 '4 4 " N., long. 148°- Regulations is amended by adding the 2 9 '2 6 '' W .) 90 nautical miles, 95 M ST,, 1 2 PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS following new airworthiness directive: AGIi Sagwon, Alaska RBN (lat. 6 9°2 2'18 " N„ DIRECTIVES long. 148°41'57" W .) 12 AGL Prudhoe Bay, V ickers. Applies to Viscount Models 744, 745D, and 810 Series airplanes. Alaska, RBN (lat. 7 0 °1 4 '5 5 " N., long. 148°- British Aircraft Corp. Model BAC 1—11, 2 3 '2 8 " W .) 12 A G L Oliktok, Alaska, RBN. 200 and 400 Series Airplanes Compliance required, within the next 1,000 hours’ time in service after the effective date Sa g w o n/Flax m an I sland, Alaska A proposal to amend Part 39 of the of this AD, unless already accomplished. From the Sagwon, Alaska, RBN (lat. Federal Aviation Regulations to include To prevent discharge of power plant Are 69°22'18" N., long. 148°41'57" W .) 12 AGL an airworthiness directive (AD ) requir extinguishant into the wrong power plant Flaxman Island, Alaska, RBN. ing removal and modification of the due to incorrect assembly of power plant fire ' Bettles/Prtjdhoe B a y , Alaska spring pots from the right and left eleva extinguisher bottles, install interference tors on BAC Model 1-11, 200 and 400 brackets and retaining cables to the de From the Betties, Alaska, RBN, 59 nautical tachable clip assemblies at the fire extin Series airplanes, was published in 34 miles 12 AGL, 76 nautical miles 95 MSL, 12 guishing bottle neck at the inner and outer AG L Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, RBN (lat. F.R. 1956. nacelle mountings in accordance with Brit 70°14'55" N., long. 148°23'28" W .). Interested persons have been afforded ish Aircraft Corp. Modification Bulletin an opportunity to participate in the D.3218 dated July 14, 1968 ( 700 Series) or B ettles/Um iat, Alaska making of the amendment. No objec Modification Bulletin FG.2094 dated July 14, From the Betties, Alaska, RBN, 59 nautical tions were received. 1968 ( 800/810 Series) or later ARB-approved miles 12 AGL, 31 nautical miles 95 MSL, 12 issues or an equivalent approved by the Chief, AGL Umiat, Alaska, RBN (lat. 69°22'25" N., In consideration of the foregoing, and Aircraft Certification Staff, FA A, Europe,’ long. 152°08'00" W .). pursuant to the authority delegated to me Africa, and Middle East Region. by the Administrator (14 CFR 11.89), U m ia t/Po in t B arrow, A laska § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal This amendment becomes effective May 11,1969. From the Umiat, Alaska, R BN (lat. 69°- Aviation Regulations is amended by 22'25" N„ long. 152°08'00" W .) 21 nauti adding the following new airworthiness (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act cal miles 12 AGL, 112 nautical miles 25 MSL, directive: ' of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423); sec. 12 AGL Point Barrow, Alaska, RBN. This 6 (c), Department of Transportation Act (49 additional control area is effective during the British A ircraft Corp. Applies to Model BAC U.S.C. 1655(c))) V specific dates and times established in 1—11, 200 and 400 Series airplanes. advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective Compliance required within the next 1,500 Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 4 date and time will be continuously published hours’ time in service after the effective date 1969. in the Alaska Airman’s Guide and Chart of this AD, unless already accomplished. R . S. S l if f , Supplement. To ensure that the shear pin which is in Acting Director, U m iat/Prudhoe B a y , Alaska stalled within the Elevator Centralizing Flight Standards Service. Spring Pots, Part Nos. AB34r-A881, A3003, From the Umiat, Alaska, RBN (lat. A3017, A3019> and A3021 remains effective, [F.R. Doc. 69—4235; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 69°22'25" N„ long. 152°08'00" W .) 12 AGL remove and disassemble the spring pots from 8:45 am .] Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, RBN (lat. 70°14'55'' N., the right and left elevators and modify in long. 148°23'28" W .). accordance with BAC 1-11 Service Bulletin SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE No. 27—A—PM 3536 or later ARB-approved 2. In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557) the fol [Airspace Docket No. 68-AL-19] issue, or FAA-approved equivalent. lowing is added: This amendment becomes effective PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Prudhoe B a y , Alaska May 11, 1969. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, Within a 5-mile radius of Prudhoe Bay Airport (lat. 70°14'55" N., long. 148°23'28" (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Awation Act AND REPORTING POINTS W.). of 1958 (49 U jS.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423); sec. Designation of Additional Control 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act (49 3. In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637) the fol U.S.C. 1655(c))) Areas, Transition Area, Control lowing is added: Zone, and Reporting Points Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 4, P rudhoe B a y , Alaska 1969. On February 12, 1969, F.R. Doc. 69- That airspace extending upward from 700 R . S. S l if f , 1787 was published in the F ederal R e g is feet above the surface within 2 miles each Acting Director, ter (34 F .R. 2047) stating that because of side of the Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, RBN (lat. Flight Standards Service. the temporary unavailability of air traf 70°14'55" N., long. 148°23'28" W.) 076° fic control service in the area of the bearing, extending from the RBN to 16 miles [F.R. Doc. 69-4234; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; northeast, and within 2 miles northwest 8:45 a.m.] north slope of Alaska, certain controlled and 4 miles southeast of the Prudhoe Bay airspace and designated reporting points RBN 256° bearing extending from the RBN were revoked effective February 7, 1969. to 24 miles southwest, and that airspace [Docket No. 9419; Amdt. 39-747] It was also stated that, in the interest extending upward from 1,200 feet above the PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS of safety, the controlled airspace and surface within the area bounded by a line beginning at lat. 69°40'00" N., long. DIRECTIVES reporting points would be redesignated as a rule without notice concurrently 153°00'00" W.; to lat. 70°33'00" N., long. with the availability of air traffic control 150°45'00" W.; thence east via 3 nautical Vickers Viscount Models 744, 745D, miles offshore to lat. 70°14'00" N., long. and 810 Series Airplanes service. Such service is now available; 146°00'00" W.; to lat. 69°35'00" N., long. accordingly, action is taken herein to re 146°00'00" W.; to lat. 69°00'00" N., long. A proposal to amend Part 39 of the designate the aforementioned controlled 148°00'00" W.; to lat. 69°00'00" N., long. Federal Aviation Regulations to include airspace and reporting points. 153°00'00" W.; thence to point of beginning.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6377
4. In § 71.211 (34 F.R. 4804) the 5. In § 71.213 (34 F.R. 4805) the Issued In Washington, D.C., on April 10, 1969. following are added: following are added: a. Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, RBN. T. M cC o r m a c k , a. Chandalar, Alaska, RBN. b . . Sagwon, Alaska, RBN. Acting Chief, Airspace and b. Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, RBN. Air Traffic Rules Division. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 c. Sagwon, Alaska, RBN. U.S.C. 1348); sec. 6 (c ), Department of Trans [F.R. Doc. 69-4374; Filed, Apr. 10, 1989; d. Umiat, Alaska, RBN. portation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) 10:31 a.m.]
SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [Reg. Docket No. 9507; Arndt. 644] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows : 1. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to delete low or medium frequency range (L / M F ), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VO R ) procedures as follows: McGrath, Alaska— McGrath, LFR 1, Arndt. 9, 2 Nov. 1963 (established under Subpart C) .- Kansas City, Mo.—Kansas City International, NDB (ADF) Runway 36, Amdt. 4, 4 Jan. 1968 (established under Subpart C). Perryton, Tex.— Perryton Municipal, ADF 1, Orig., 29 Oct. 1968 (established under Subpart C ). Chicago, 111. (W heeling)— Chicagoland, VOR-1, Orig., 28 Jan. 1967 (established under Subpart C ). Elizabethtown, Ky.— Elizabethtown-Hardin County, VOR-1, Orig., 11 Feb. 1967 (established under Subpart C ). Gage, Okla.— Gage Municipal, VOR 1, Amdt. 4, 30 Oct. 1965 (established under Subpart C). Kansas City, Mo.— Kansas City International, VOR Runway 27, Orig., 4 Jan. 1968 (established under Subpart C ). McGrath, Alaska—McGrath, VOR 1, Amdt. 2, 18 June 1966 (established under Subpart Ç ). 2. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to cancel low or medium frequency range (L / M F ), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VO R ) procedures as follows: Clinton, Iowa— Clinton Municipal, VOR Runway 32, Amdt. 7, 21 Oct. 1967, canceled, effective 1 May 1969. 3. By amending § 97.13 of Subpart B to delete terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures as follows: Minneapolis, Minn.— Flying Cloud, TerVOR—9L, Amdt. 3, 17 Sept. 1966 (established under Subpart C ) . 4. By amending § 97.15 of Subpart B to delete very high frequency omnirange-distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Kansas City, Mo.— Kansas City International, VOR/DME Runway 9, Orig., 4 Jan. 1968 (established under Subpart C ). McGrath, Alaska—McGrath, VOR/DME 1, Amdt. 2, 16 July 1966 (established under Subpart C). 5. By amending § 97.17 of Subpart B to establish instrument landing system (IL S ) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radiais are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If aft instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach-procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots
Lisbon Int...... F N D RBn...... Direct____!...... 2700 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-}$ Towsonlnt...... F N D RBn______Direct...... 2700 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1}$ b a l v o r t a c ...... ______F N D RBn...... i~. Direct______2700 S-dn-15...... 200-}$ 200-}$ 200-}$ EMI VO RTAC ...... FND RBn (NOPT)__...... ______Direct...... 2700 A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 With glide slope inoperative: * S-dn-15_____ 500-}$ 500-}$ 500-}$
Procedure turn W side of crs, 332° Outbnd, 152° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of ElliCott RBn. Minimum altitude of glide slope over Ellicott RBn, 2642' MSL. Crs and distance, Ellicott RBn to airport, 162°—7.5 nautical miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2700'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1435'—3.8 nautical miles; at MM, 364'—0.5 nautical mile. v . visual eontact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums, or if landing not àccomplished within 3.8 miles after passing OM, climb to 2000' on B A L VOR R 105° to Bodkin Int. Hold E, 1 minute, left turns, 285° Inbnd. Note: ASR. ’ glide slope inoperative maintain 1400' until passing OM. MSA within 25 miles of LOM: 000°-090°—2400'; 090°-180°—2400'; 180°-270°—2100'; 270°-360°—2400' j City, Baltimore; State, Md.; Airport name, Friendship International; Elev., 146'; Fac. Class, ILS; Ident., I-F N D ; Procedure No. IL S Runway 15, Amdt. Orig; Eff. date, 1 May 69
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6378 RULES AND REGULATIONS
6. By amending § 97.17 of Subpart B to delete instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Kansas City, Mo.- Kansas City International, LOC (BC) Runway 18, Arndt. 5, 15 July 1967 (established under Subpart C). Kansas City, Mo. Kansas City International, ILS Runway 36, Amdt. 5, 4 Jan. 1968 (established under Subpart C). 7. By amending § 97.21 of Subpart C to establish low or medium frequency range (U/MF) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype LFR Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airnnrt Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R port eIeva^on' „ “ an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach w u f ? h n ^ ? ™ ^ H C°fndUCted ? accordance. w* h a d“ erant Procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach m S m n X f f i 3 S S S with those established for en route operation m the particular area or as set forth below. oorrespona
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 1.4 miles after passing MC LFR. (feet)
Climb straight ahead to 2700' on NW crs (272° Outbnd) within 10 miles. Supplementary charting information: Mountainous terrain “ all" quadrants. Terrain 1266', 3.1 miles S of airport. Terrain 1677', 3.6 miles S of airport. Appel Mountain lses)7, 4.4 mi 1m n of airport.
Procedure turn S side of crs, 096° Outbnd, 276° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of MC L F R . F A F , MC L F R . Final approach crs; 272°. Distance F A F to M AP, 1.4 miles. Minimum altitude over MC L F R , 1400'. MSA: NW—6200'; N E —3000'; SE—3400'; SW—4200'. N ote: IF R departures must comply with published SIDs. ‘ Alternate minimums Category D, 1000-2.
Day and N ight Minimums
n ~ A B. C D MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS TTA A
® ...... -...... 800 1 463 800 1 463 800 1J$ 463 1100 2 763 A ...... —-----...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less.—Standard.! T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, McGrath; State, Alaska; Airport name, McGrath; Elev., 337'; Facility, MC; Procedure No. LFR-1, Amdt. 10; ES. date, 1 May 69; Sud Amdt No L F R 1 Amdt. 9; Dated, 2 Nov. 63 * * ’ 8. By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to establish very high frequency omnirange (VOR) and very high frequency- distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype VOR Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A, and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airoort elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds dffe4t R V R 8 “ rp0rt elevation. — , tbe gf??ve i£Pe 18 conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, accordance a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. K
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To—■ Via altitudes M AP: 9.7 miles after passing L A N VOR.
Climbing left turn to 2600' direct to LAN VOR. Supplementary charting information: Plot radial from L A N V O R that intercepts Runway 20 threshold. 1310' tower 6 miles. N E of airport.
Procedure tum W side of crs, 033° Outbnd, 213° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles 0f L A N V O R F A F , L A N VO R . Final approach crs, 213 . Distance F A F to M AP, 9.7 miles. Minimum altitude over L A N VO R , 2600'. MSA: 000°-180°—2900'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—2200'. N ote: Use Lansing altimeter setting. Day and N ight Minimums
Cond. ______- ______? ______£ ______2 _ MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS
8-20------1520 1 631 1520 1 631 1520 IJi 631 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... — 1620 1 631 1520 1 631 1520 1J0 631 NA A ------Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less.—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, Charlotte; State, Mich.; Airport name, Fitch H. Beach; Elev., 889'; Facility, L A N ; Procedure No. V O R Runway 20, Amdt. Orig.; Efi. date, 1 May 69
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6379
Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—'T y p e VOR— Continued
-— , §Hj ‘ Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: OBK VORTAC. (feet)
Make right turn, climb to 2500' on O B K V O R T A C R 060° and return to O B K VORTAC. Supplementary charting information: Tower 884', 3.3 miles E N E of airport. Tower 775', 2 miles E of airport.
Procedure tum N side of crs, 060° Outbnd, 240° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of O B K VO R T A C . Final approach crs, 240°. Minimum altitude over Toll Int, 1220'. MSA: 000o-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—3100'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270o-360°—2300'. N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Use Chicago O'Hare altimeter setting. Day and N ight Minimums
A B C ______D_
MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS
C...... 1220 1 554 1220 1 564 1220 Wi 554 N A Dual V O R or VOR/DME Minimums: MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 1100 1 434 1120 1 454 - 1120 1)$ 454 N A A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—300-1 all runways. T over 2-eng.—300-1 all runways.
City, Chicago (Wheeling); State, Hi*: Airport name, Chicagoland; Elev., 666'; Facility, OBK; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 1; Efl. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 28 Jan. 67
Terjninal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 9.8 miles after passing C VA VO R . (feet)
ML LOM. C VA V O R Direct. 2600 Climb to 2300', left turn to C VA VO R.
Procedure turn W side of crs, 220° Outbnd, 040° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of CVA VO R. FAF, CVA VOR. Final approach crs, 040 . Distance F A F to M AP, 9.8 miles. Minimum altitude over CVA VO R , 2300'. MSA: 090°-180°—2900'; 180°-270°—2700'; 270o-090o—2200'. Note: Use Moline, 111., altimeter setting. Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
8-3...... 1360 1 653 1360 1 653 1360 1JÎ 653 1360 ljg 653 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 1360 1 653 1360 1 653 1360 1J$ 653 1360 2 653
A ~ ...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, Clinton; State, Iowa; Airport name, Clinton Municipal; Elev., 707'; Facility, CVA; Procedure No. V O R Runway 3, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 No. 69- -2 6380 RULES AND REGULATIONS
Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure-^ T ypb VOR— Continued
germinal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 7.1 miles after passing CVA VOR. (feet)
M L LOM ____ ...... CVA V O R ______2600 Climb to 2300', right turn to CVA VOR. Supplementary charting Information: TDZ elevation, 749'.
Procedure turn W side of crs, 036° Outbnd, 216° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 mil«« 0f CVA VOR. P A P , CVA VO R . Final approach crs, 216°. Distance F A F to M AP, 7.1 miles. Minimum altitude over CVA VO R , 2300'. MSA: 090°-180°—2900'; 180°-270°—2700'; 270°-090°—2200'. N ote: Use Moline, HI., altimeter setting when control zone not effective. $Alternate minimums not authorized when control zone not effective except operators with approved weather reporting service.
Day and N ight Minimums
„ „ A B C D Cond. ------MDA VIS HAT MD A VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
8-20...... 1280 1 531 1280 1 - 531 1280 1 531 1280 1}£ 531 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... 1280 1 527 ' 1280 1 527 1280 1}4 527 1320 2 567 A__...... Standards T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, Davenport; State, Iowa; Airport name, Davenport Municipal; Elev., 753'; Facility, CVA; Procedure No. V O R Runway 20, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 1 May 69.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 4.4 miles after passing Indian Hills From— To— Via altitudes Int/8-mile DME Fix. (feet)
EWO V O R T A C ...... ______Indian Hills Int/8-mile DME Fix EWO, R 305°...... ______2500 Left climbing turn to 3000' direct EWO V O R T A C , and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold SE, 1 minute, right turns, 305° Inbnd.. Chart: 1330' tower 37°41'59/' N./85°49'07" W.; 1450' tower 37°40'55" N./85°50'32" W. Final approach crs crosses airport refer ence point.
Procedure turn N side of crs, 125° Outbnd, 305° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles of EWO V O R T A C . k F A F , Indian Hills Int/8-mile DME Fix. Final approach crs, 305°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4.4 miles. Minimum altitude over EWO V O R T A C , 3000'; over Indian Hills Int/8-mile DME Fix, 2500'. MSA: 000°-090°—2300'; 090°-180°—2400'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360i—2500'. N ote: Use Fort Knox, Ky., altimeter setting.
Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D Cond. ------MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS VIS
C ...... Ç...... 1640 1 760 1640 1760 N A N A VOR/DME Minimums; MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HA A C ______„ ______1480 1 600 1480 1 600 N A - NA A ______Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Not authorized.
City, Elizabethtown; State, Ky.; Airport name, Elizabethtown-Hardin County; Elev., 880'; Facility, EWO; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 1; Eft. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 11 Feb. 67
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6381
Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—Type V OR—Continued
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 5.7 miles after passing G AG From— To— Via altitudes VORTAO. (feet)
Climb to 4000', left turn direct G AG V O R T A O and hold. Supplementary charting Information: Hold W of GAG VORTAO on R 289°, 109° Inbnd, right turns, 1 minute.
Procedure tum S side of crs, 289° Outbnd, 109° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles of G AG V O R T A C . FAF, GAG V O R T A C . Final approach crs, 109°. Distance F A F to M AP, 5.7 miles. Minimum altitude over G AG V O R T A C , 4000'. * MSA: 000°-180°—3900'; 180°-270°—4200'; 270°-360°—4000'. * Runway lights for night operation on 17-35 only. Day and N ight Minimums
A B O D Cond. MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HA A VIS
C*...... 2760 1 537 2760 1 537 2760 1 537 NA A ...... — ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. Tover2-eng.—Standard.
City, Gage; State, Okla.; Airport name, Gage Municipal; Elev., 2223'; Facility, G AG ; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 5; Eft. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. V O R 1, Arndt. 4; Dated, 30 Oct. 65
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 4.8 miles after passing M KC From— To— Via altitudes V O R T A C . (feet)
R 012°, MKC VORTAC CW...... R 088°, MKC VORTAC.. 7-mile Arc...... 2600 Climb to 2700' on M KC VO RT A O R 268°, R 149°, MKC VORTAO CCW...... I ...... R 088°, MKC VORTAG.. 7-mile Arc...... 2600 intercept STJ V O R T A C R 170° and 7-mileDME Are...... MKC VORTAO (NOPT) M KC R 088°...... ______2400 proceed S to Lansing Int. Supplementary charting information: TD Z elevation, 1025'.
Procedure tum N side of crs, 088° Outbnd, 268° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of MK C VO RT AO . FAF, MKC V O R T A C . Final approach crs, 268°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4.8 miles. Minimum altitude over M K C V O R T A C , 2400'. MSA: 045°-135°—2600'; 135°-225°—3100'; 225°-315°—2400'; 315°-045°—2500'. Notes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Inoperative components table does not apply to H IR L .
Day and N ight Minimums
C o n d . ------MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
8-27...... -...... 1440 1 415 1440 1 415 1440 1 415 1440 1 415 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HA A C...... - 1540 1 515 1540 1 515 1540 1H 515 1580 2 555 ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other runways. runways.
City, Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; Facility, M K C; Procedure No. V O R Runway 27, Arndt. 1; Efl. date 1 May 69- Sud - Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 4 Jan. 68
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M A P: 5 miles after passing Mount Corn- From— To— Via altitudes fort Int. (feet)
SHB VOR Mount Comfort Int. Direct. 2400 Climb to 2400' within 10 miles, right turn, return to Mount Comfort Int. Supplementary charting information: Plot approach radial which intercepts runway centerline at threshold. T D Z elevation, 854'.
Procedure turn E side of crs, 163° Outbnd, 343° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of Mount Comfort Int. Comfort Int. Final approach crs, 343°. Distance F A F to M AP, 5 miles. Ma *mliSoaltltPde over Mount Comfort Int, 2400'. 180°-270°—3100'; 270°-360°—2900'. s. (l) Dual V O R receivers required. (2) Radar vectoring. (3) Use Indianapolis, Ind., altimeter settings
FEDERAL REGISTER, V O t: 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRII I I , 1969 6382 RULES AND REGULATIONS
Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype VOR— Continued
D at and N ight Minimums
„ , A B O D MDA VIS BAT MDA VIS HAT VIS VIS
S-36...... 1320 1 466 1320 1 466 N A NA MDA VIS HAA ' MDA VIS HAA C ...... 1360 1 506 1360 1 506 N A NA A ...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, McCordsville; State, Ind.; Airport name, Indianapolis Brookside; Elev., 854'; Facility, SHB; Procedure No. V O R Runway 36, Amdt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: MCG VORTAC. (feet)
MC L F R ...... ______MCG V O R T A C ...... _____ Direct____ ...... 2700 Climb straight ahead on R 280° to 2700' within 10 miles. Supplementary charting information: Mountainous terrain “ all” quadrants. Terrain 1266', 3.1 miles S of airport. Terrain 1677', 3.6 miles S of airport. Appel Mountain 1569', 4.4 miles N of airport.
Procedure turn S side of crs, 100° Outbnd, 280° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of MCG V O R T A C . Final approach crs, 280°. MSA: 170°-260°—4200'; 260°-350°—5200'; 350°-170°—3000'. N ote: IF R departures must comply with published SIDs. •Alternate minimums for Category D, 1000-2.
D ay and N ight Minimums
AB C D MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS H A A M D A VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA
C ...... ______860 1 523 860 1 523 860 1 X 523 1100 2 763 A ...... Standard.* T 2-eng or less.—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, McGrath; State, Alaska; Airport name, McGrath; Elev., 337'; Facility, MCG; Procedure No, VOR-1, Amdt.. 3; Efl. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Amdt. No. V O R 1, Amdt. 2; Dated, 18 June 66
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— 1 Via altitudes M AP: FCM VOR. (feet)
Victoria Int...... FCM VOR ...... Direct______2200 Right climbing turn to 2200' on R 220° Prior Int...... FCM V O R ______.D ire ct___: ______2200 within 10 miles; return to FCM VOR. MSP V O R T A C ______FCM V O R ______Direct______2500 Supplementary charting information: Final F G T V O R ...... FCM V O R ...... Direct...... 2200 approach crs intercepts runway center- line 3000' from threshold. TD Z elevation, 905'.
Procedure turn S side of crs, 286° Outbnd, 106° Inbnd, 2200'within 10 miles of FCM VO R. Final approach crs, 106°. Minimum altitude over Excelsior Int, 1440\ MSA: 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—2400'; 270°-090°—2600'. N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Runways 9R/27L unlighted. (3) Use Minneapolis International altimeter setting when control zone not effective; circling and straight-in M D A increased 40' when control zone not eflective. (4) Inoperative table does not apply to R E IL Runway 9L. •Alternate minimums not authorized when control zone not eflective.
Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D Cond. MDAVISHAT MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HATVIS HAT HAT
S-9L...... 1440 1 535 1440 1 535 1440 1 535 1440 1H 535 MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAAMDA VIS HAA C ...... 1440 1 535 1440 1 535 1440 IX 535 1460 2 555 Dual VO R Minimums:
MDAVISHAT MDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT S-9L...... 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAAMDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C_...... 1300 1 395 1360 1 455 1360 IX 455 1460 2 655 A ______Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.
City, Minneapolis; State, Minn.; Airport name, Flying Cloud; Elev., 905'; Facility, FCM; Procedure No. V O R Runway 9L, Amdt. 4; Efl. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Amdt. No. TerVOR-9L, Amdt. 3; Dated, 17 Sept. 66
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6383
Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype VOR— Continued
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— T o— Via altitudes MAP: FCM VOR. (feet)
Victoria Int...... - FCM V O R ...... Direct...... 2600 Climb to 2600' on R 300° within 10 miles; Prior Int...... FCM V O R ...... Direct...... 2600 return to VOR. MSP V O R T A C ______... ______FCM V O R ...______Direct______2600 Supplementary charting information: Final FGT V O R ...... -...... FCM V O R ...... Direct...... 2600 approach crs intercepts runway center- line 3000' from threshold. T D Z elevation, 905'.
Procedure turn E side of crs, 173° Outbnd, 353° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of FCM VO R . Final approach crs, R 173°. Minimum altitudé over Dean Int., 1400'. MSA: 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—2400'; 270°090°—2600'. Notes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Runways 9R/27L unlighted. (3) Use Minneapolis International altimeter setting when control zone not effective; circling and straight-in MDA increased 40' when control zone not effective. ‘ Alternate minimums not authorized when control zone not effective.
Day and N ight Minimums
AB CD Cond. MDAVISHAT MDA VISHATMDA VISHAT MDAVISHAT
S-36- ...... i ...... 1400 1 495 1400 1 495 1400 1 495 1400 1 495 MDA VIS HAAMDAVISHAAMDA VIS HAAMDAVIS HAA c...... W i ...... 1400 1 495 1400 1 495 1400 495 1460 2 555 Dual V O R Minimums:
MDA VISHAT MDAVISHATMDAVISHAT MDAVIS HAT 8-36...... 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 1240 1 335 A ...... T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.
City, Minneapolis; State, Minn.; Airport name, Flying Cloud; Elev., 905'; Facility, FCM; Procedure No. V O R Runway 36, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 4 miles after passing 4-mile Radar From— To— Via altitudes Fix. (feet)
Climb to 2000' on M SY V O R R 079° to Opal Int.; or, when directed by A TC , climb to 1500', left turn to M SY V O R R 064° to Slidell Int.
Procedure turn hot authorized. FAF, 4-mile Radar Fix. Final approach crs, 079°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4 miles. Minimum altitude over 4-mile Radar Fix, 1200'. MSA: 000°-360°—2000'. Note: Radar required. ‘ Night operations not authorized Runways 8/26. Day and N ight Minimums
Cond. ------^------l______MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS IT A A
C------460 1 451 460 1 451 520 1 611 560 2 651 A..------Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.* T over 2-eng.—Standard.*
City, New Orleans; State, La.; Airport name, Lakefront; Elev., 91; Facility, MSY; Procedure No. VOR-3, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6384 RULES AND REGULATIONS
Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— T y p e VOR— Continued Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , HA A, and R A. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 6.3-mile DME Fix. (feet)
R 223°, MKC VORTAC CW_____ ... ______R 268°, MKC VO RTAC...... 20-mile A rc...... 2600 Climbing left turn to 2800', intercept R R 331°, MKC VORTAC CCW______...... R 268°, MKC VORTAC.. .. 20-mile Arc...... 2700 331° M K C V O R T A C , proceed to Cam 20-mile DME Arc______12-mile DME Fix, R 268° (N O P T )._ .. MKC, R 268°...... 2600 den Int. Supplementary charting information: TDZ elevation, 1014'.
Procedure tum S side of crs, 268° Outbnd, 088 Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of 12-mile DM E Fix, R 268° M K C V O R T A C . F A F , 12-mile DME Fix. Final approach crs, 088°. Distance F A F to M AP, 5.7 miles. Minimum altitude over 12-mile DME Fix, 2600'. MSA: 045°-135°—2600'; 135°-225°—3100'; 225°-315°—2400'; 315°-045°—2500'. N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Inoperative components table does not apply to H IR L .
Day and Night Minimums
Cond. ------MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
S-9...... 1420 1 406 1420 1 406 1420 1 406 v1420 1 406 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS TTAA C ...... —------1540 1 615 1540 * 1 515 1640 1J* 515 1580 2 555 A ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other T over 2-eng—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other runways. runways.
City, Kansas'City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; Facility, M KC; Procedure No. VOR/DME Runway 9, Arndt. 1; Eft. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 4 Jan. 68
Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VORTAC Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H AA, and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance With the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minünum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 1-mile DM E on R 345°. (feet)
MC L F R ...... MCG VORTAC ______direct 2600 Turn left, climb to 3000' on R 100° within R 321°, MC G V O R T A C CW______...... R 345°, MCG VORTAC (NOPT)._. . 15-mile Arc MCG, R 337° 4000 15 miles. lead radial. Supplementary charting information: R 035°, MC G V O R T A C CCW...... ______R 345°, MC G V O R T A C (NO PT)___ . 15-mile Arc MCG, R 353° 2900 Mountainous terrain “ all” quadrants. lead radial. Terrain 1266', 3.1 miles S of airport. 15-mile DME Fix...... 10-mile DME Fix (N O P T )...... R 345°, M CG V O R T A C ... 2600 Terrain 1677', 3.6 miles S of airport. Appel Mountain 1569', 4.4 miles N of airport.
Procedure turn E side of crs, 345° Outbnd, 165° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of 4-mile DME Fix. Final approach crs, 165°. Minimum altitude over 10-mile DME Fix, 2600'; over 4-mile DME Fix, 1060'; over 2-mile DME Fix, 860'. MSA: 170°-260°—4200'; 260°-350°—5200'; 350°-170°—3000'. N ote: IF R departures must comply with published SIDs. •Alternate minimums Category D, 1000-2.
Day and N ight Minimums
. A B C D Cond. ------MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
8-16 ...... 680 1 343 680 1 343 680 1 343 680 1 343 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA c ...... - '800 1 463 800 1 463 800 IJ* 463 1100 2 783 A ...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.
City, McGrath; State, Alaska; Airport name, McGrath; Elev., 337'; Facility, MC G; Procedure No. V O R T A C , Runway 16, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR/DME 1, Amdt. 2; Dated, 16 July 66
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6385
9. By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to amend very high frequency omnirange (VO R ) and very high frequency-distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—Type VOR Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A , and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . u tj an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— T o— Via altitudes M AP: 2.4 miles after passing E N A VO R . (feet)
KE L F R ___ a ...... E N A V O R ______...... D ire c t...... 1700 Climb to 1700' on R 186°, E N A V O R with Swanson DME Fix______...... R 006°, V O R (N O P T )...... ______220° heading 3.5 miles...... 1700 in 15 miles. Supplementary charting information: An tenna 1857, 0.8 mile SW of airport. An tenna 1407, 0.4 mile SW of airport. L F R antenna 242', 1.3 miles N of airport.
Procedure turn W side of crs, 006° Outbnd, 186° Inbnd, 1700' within 10 miles of E N A VO R . FAF, E N A VOR. Final approach crs, R 186°. Distance F A F to M AP, 2.4 miles. Minimum altitude over E N A VO R , 9007; over K E L F R , 500'. MR A ; 000°-090°—2000'; 090°-180°—30007; 180°-270°—140(/; 270°-360°—15007.
Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDA VIS H A T M D A VIS HAT
S-19...... i 600 1 • ~ 408 500 1 408 500 1 408 600 1 408 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAAMDA VIS H A A M D A VIS HAA C...... 500 1 408 56ft 1 468 560 1M 468 660 2 568 V O R/LFR Minimums:
MDA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDAVIS H A T M D A VIS HAT s-19 /■ 360 1 268 360 1 268 360 1 268 360 1 ^268 A...... T 2-eng. or less—Standard T over 2-eng.--Standard.
City, Kenai; State, Alaska; Airport name, Kenai Municipal; Elev., 927; Facility, E N A ; Procedure No. V O R Runway 19, Arndt. 5; Eff. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 31 Oct. 68
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via— altitudes M AP: 7.4 miles after passing M S Y VO R. (feet)
10-mile DME MSY, R 232° . MSY VOR (NOPT)...... Direct______...... 1500 Climb to 20007 on AISY V O R R 079° to 10-mile DME MSY, R 269° MSY VOR (NOPT) . 1500 Opal Int or, when directed by A T C , 10-mile DME MSY, R 289° . MSY VOR (NOPT)...... Direct______1500 climb to 15007, left turn to M SY VO R , R 064° to Slidell Int.
Procure turn N side of crs, 259° Outbnd, 079° Inbnd, 15007 within 10 miles of M SY VO R . MSY VOR. Final approach crs, 079°. Distance F A F to M AP, 7.4 miles. Minimum altitude over M SY V O R , 15007. MSA: 000°-360°—20007. Notes: (1) ASR. (2) Night operations not authorized Runways 8/26.
D ay and N ight Minimums
A B C ✓ D Cond. MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA AIDA VIS H A A M D A VIS HAA C m 511 560 2 551 A___ T 2-eng. or less—Standard; T over 2-eng.--Standard.
City, New Orleans; State, La.; Airport name, Lakefront; Elev., O'; Facility, M SY; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 19 Dec. 68
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11. 1969 6386 RULES AND REGULATIONS
10. By amending § 97.25 of Subpart C to establish localizer (LOC) and localizer-type directional aid (LDA) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype LOC Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A, and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M A P : 4 miles after passing Platte City Int. (feet)
M KC V O R T A C ______Platte City Int...... Direct. 2600 Climb to 2600' direct to Manchester (MC) Manchester (MC) LO M ______Platte City Int______Direct. 2600 LOM. Camden In t ...... Platte City Int (NOPT).______Direct. 2200 Supplementary charting information: TDZ elevation; 995'.
Procedure tum W side of crs, 005° Outbnd, 186° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of Platte City Int. F A F , Platte City Int. Final approach crs, 185°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4 miles. Minimum altitude over Platte City Int, 2200'. N ote: Radar vectoring. Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
S-18...... 1340 345 1340 % 345 1340 % 345 1340 1 345 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS .ÇAA C ...... 1540 1 515 1540 1 515 1540 VA 515 1580 2 555 A ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other runways. runways.
City, Kansas City; State Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; Facility, I-M C I; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 18, Arndt. 6; Eff. date, l May 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 15 July 67
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 4.8 miles after passing Twinbrook From— To— Via altitudes Int. (feet)
R 149°, MKC VORTAC CCW R N I L O C ...______7-mile Arc M KC, R 104°, lead 2600 Climb to 2600' direct to Rondell (RN) radial. LOM. R 012°, MKC VORTAC CW._ RNILOC ______7-mile Arc M KC, R 072° lead 2600 Supplementary charting information: TDZ radial. elevation, 1025'. 7-mile A rc...... Twinbrook Int (N O P T ) RN I LOC crs. 2400
Procedure turn N side of crs, 088° Outbnd, 268° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of Twinbrook Int. F A F , Twinbrook Int. Final approach crs, 268°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4.8 miles. Minimum altitude over Twinbrook Int, 2400'. N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Inoperative components table does not apply to H IR L .
Day and N ight Minimums
A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT
S-27...... - 1440 1 415 1440 1 415 1440 1 415 1440 1 446 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... * ...... 1540 1 515 1540 1 515 1540 VA 615 1580 2 655 A ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Tover2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway 36; Standard Standard all other runways. all other runways.
City, Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; Facility, I-R N I; Procedure No. LO C (BC) Runway 27, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 1 May 69
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6387
11. By amending § 97.25 of Subpart C to amend localizer (LOC) and localizer-type directional aid (LDA) procedures as follows. Standard I nstrument A pproach P roceduee—T ype LOC Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A , and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation* in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . . , .___ PiBtmces a aDDroach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure; nnicasanaonroach isconducted in accordance with a diflerent procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: 2.2 mües after passing Concho Int. From— To— Via altitudes (feet)
3600 Climb to 4000' direct SJ LOM, or, climb to R 014°, SJT V O R T A C CW— SJT LOC (B C )...... 10-mile A R C SJT, R 017°, lead radial. 4000', left turn, intercept and proceed to 3500 Christoval Int via SJT VO RT A C R 171°. R 102°, SJT V O R T A C CCW. SJT LO C (B C )...... 10-mile A R C SJT, R 040°, lead radial. Supplementary charting information: T D Z 3500 elevation, 1905'. SJ LOM...... Concho In t______; ------Direct------Concho In t______» ------Direct------3500 SJT V O R T A C ._...... 2700 10-mile DME A R C ------Concho Int (N O P T )...... LO C crs...... -......
Procedure turn E side of crs, 033° Outbnd, 213° Inbnd, 3400' within 10 miles of Concho Int. FAF, Concho Int. Final approach crs, 213°. Distance F A F to M AP, 2.2 miles. Minimum altitude over Concho Int, 2680 '. Tu t a Ten NTtottt M ttvtmttms
A B ______C______D_ C0n City. San Angelo: State, Tex.: Airport name, Mathis Field: Elev., 1915'; Facility, I-SJT; Procedure No. LO C (BC) Runway 21, Arndt. 5; Eft. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt; ’ No. 4; Dated, 13 June 68 12. By amending § 97.27 of Subpart C to establish nondirectional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADF) procedures as follows: „ Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—Type N D B (A D F ) Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A, and R A . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are hi nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. . . .. h If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a diflerent procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 5.8 mües after passing R N LOM. (feet) Camden Int______Rondell (R N ) LO M ...... Direct. 2700 Climbing right turn to 2700', proceed to New Market Int______RondeU (R N ) L O M ...... V - . Direct. 2700 Manchester (MC) LOM. Wood Int...______RondeU (R N ) LOM (N O P T )...... Direct. 2700 Supplementary charting information: T D Z Lansing Int...... RondeU (R N ) L O M ...... Direct. 2700 elevation, 1014'. De Soto Int...... RondeU R N ) LO M ...... Direct. 2700 MKCVORTAC...... RondeU (R N ) LO M ...... Direct. 2700 BSP VO R TAC ...... RondeU (R N ) L O M ...... Direct. 2900 Manchester (MC) LOM. RondeU (R N ) LO M ...... Direct. 2700 Procedure tum S side of crs, 268° Outbnd, 088° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of R N LOM; FAF, R N LOM. Final approach crs, 088°. Distance F A F to M AP, 5.8 mües. Minimum altitude over R N LOM, 2700'. MSA: 045°-135°—3100'; 135°-315°—2700'; 315°-045°—2800'. N ote: Radar vectoring. ’ , , , , D ay and N ight Minimums A B ______C______D______MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT S-9...... 1460 1 446 1460 1 446 1460 1 446 1460 1 446 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C.______1540 J 515 1540 1 515 1540 1H 815 1680 2 556 A...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard aU other T over 2-eng.—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard aU other runways. runways. City, Kansas bity; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; FacUity,.RN; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Runway 9, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL I I , 1969 No. 69- 6388 RULES AND REGULATIONS Stahdard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF)— Continued Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: 4.4 miles after passing MC LOM. (feet) MKCVORTAC ...... ______Manchester (MC) L O M ...... Direct______...... 2600 Climb to 2600' on bearing 005°, proceed to Farley Int______Manchester (MC) LOM ...... Direct 2finn Camden Int; or, when directed by ATC, Lansing T n t...... Manchester (M C) LO M ______2600 climbing left turn to 2600' to Manchester De Soto Irrt______...... Manchester (MC) LOM (N O P T ) Direct ...... 2300 (MC) LOM. Camden Int______...... Manchester (MC) LO M ...... 2600 Supplementary charting information: TDZ Rondell (R N ) LO M ...... Manchester (MC) LOM ...... Direct...... 2600 elevation, 1011'. BSPVORTAC ...... ______Manchester (MC) L O M ...... Direct...... 3000 Procedure turn W side of ore, 185° Outbnd, 005° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of MC LOM. F A F , MC LOM. Final approach crs, 005°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4.4 miles. Minimum altitude over Manchester (MC) LOM, 2300'. MSA: 045°-135°—2500'; 135°-225°—3100'; 225°-315°—270Cfc 315°-045°—2400'. N ote: Radar vectoring. Day and N ight Minimums A B CD Cond. MDA VISHAT MDA VISHAT MDA VISHAT MDAVISHAT S-36___ ...... 1380 R VR 40 369 1380 R V R 40 369 1380 R V R 40 369 1380 R V R 50 369 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... ; ...... 1540 1 615 1540 1 515 1540 IX 515 1580 2 655 A ...... _____ Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24, Runway 36; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—R V R 24, Runway 36; Standard all other City, Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1026'; Facility, MC; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Runway 36, Arndt. 5; E£f. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 4 Jan. 68 Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes M AP: MOB ND B . (feet) BRLVORTAC ...... MQB N D B ...... Direct. 2500 Climb to 2300', right turn to MQB NDB. Canton Int_.______. ____ MQB N D B ______Direct. 2600 Supplementary charting information: Webster Int______MQB N D B ..______Direct. 2600 Final approach crs crosses runway center- line extened 3000' from threshold. Steel tower 3 miles SW to 1209'. Procedure turn S side of crs, 080° Outbnd, 260° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of MQB N D B . Final approach crs, 260°. MSA: 000°-360°—2300'. N ote: Use Burlington, Iowa, altimeter setting. % IF R departuré procedures: Runways 27 and 9—When weather below 500-2, climb straight ahead to 2300' before proceeding on crs. Day and N ight Minimums A B CD Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HATVISVIS S-27...... 1240 1 537 1240 1 537 NA NA MDA VIS HAAMDA VIS HAA C...... 1240 1 637 1240 1 537 NA NA Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—Standard.% City, Macomb; State, HI.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 703'; Facility, MQB; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Runway 27, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69 FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6389 Standard instrum ent A pproach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF)— Continued Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: PYX NDB. (feet) ...... P Y X N D B ...... Direct____ ...... 4500 Climbing right turn to 4500' and proceed via 090° bearing from P Y X N D B to within 20 miles. Procedure turn S side of crs, 090° Outbnd, 270° Inbnd, 4500' within 10 miles of P Y X ND B . Pinal approach crs, 270°. Minimum altitude over P Y X N D B , 3580'. MSA: 000°-360°—4500'. N ote: Use Gage, OMa., FSS altimeter settmg. *Runway lights for night operation on 17-35 only. „ „ Day and Night Minimums A B C D Cond. ;------M D A VIS HAA MDA VIS ~ HAA VIS VIS C*...... 3580 1 665 3580 1 665 N A NA A ______N ot authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. Tover2-eng.—Standard. Citv Perryton: State, Tex.: Airport name, Perryton Municipal; Elev., 2915'; Facility, P Y X ; Procedure No. N D B (A D F )-l, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 1 M ay 69; Sup. Arndt. No. A D F 1, Orig.; Dated, 29 Oct. 66 Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: SIX NDB. (feet) Commerce In t...... S IX N D B ...... _____ Direct____ ...... 2200 Climbing left turn to 20007; return to MAW V O R ...... SIX NDB...... Direct____ ...... 2000 S IX ND B . Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs crosses runway threshold. Procedure turn E side of crs, 012° Outbnd, 192° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of S IX N D B . Final approach crs, 192°. MSA: 000°-090°—2200'; 090°-270°—1900'; 270°-360°—1800'. N ote: Use Cape Girardeau, Mo., altimeter setting. Day and N ight Minimums A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS VIS S-20...... 1060 1 746 .1060 1 746 N A NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 1060 1 746 1060 1 746 N A NA A ...... _...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard. City, Sikeston; State, Mo.; Airport name, Memorial Municipal; Elev., 314'; Facility, SIX; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Runway 20, Arndt. Orig.; Eft. date, 1 May 69 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6390 RULES AND REGULATIONS Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—Type NDB (A D F )— Continued dures^^oHows*1^ ^ ^ Subpart C to amend nondirectional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADP) proce- Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure—T ype NDB (AD F) Cem * aretoMab«™ ^ toatlOT. Terminal routes Missed approach From— Minimum To— Via altitudes M AP: 2.7 miles after passing HHB NDB. (feet) HB Q VO BTAG ------H H B N D B ------Direct------2000 Climbing right turn to 2000' direct to HHB N D B and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold NW, 1 minute, right turns, 130° Inbnd. Airspace restricted area (R-4401 A and B), 5 miles SE of airport. LRCO 122.1, ______' 123.6. T D Z elevation, 151'. Procedure turn W side of crs, 326° Outbnd, 145“ Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of HH B N D B F A P , H H B N D B . Final approach crs, 125°, Distance F A F to M AP, 2.7 miles. Minimum altitude over H H B N D B , 1060'. MSA: 000“-360°—1800': N ote: Use MCB FSS altimeter setting between hours of 1700-0800 local and all M D A ’s increased 300'. Operators with approved weather reporting service authorized standard alternate minimum^ D ay and N ight Minimums Cond. ______? ______2______MPA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS S-13------_------620 1 469 620 1 469 620 1 469 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS t t a a C ------640 / I 489 660, 1 509 700 V& 549 NA A — " " 1 N ot authorized.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard* City, Hattiesburg; State, Miss.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 161'; Facility, H H B; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Bunway 13, Arndt. 1; Eft. date, 1 May 69- Sup Arndt. No; Orig.; Dated, 17 Apr. 69 Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— T o— Via altitudes MAP: RCR NDB. (feet) ClavDool Int _ R flR NTVR O X IV O R ...... Climb straight ahead to 2300', return to O K K V O R T A C ______NDB, Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs intercepts runway center- line 2000' from end of runway. TDZ elevation, 790'. Procedure tum N side of crs, 097° Outbnd, 277° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 mil«.» of NDB. - Final approach crs, 277°. Minimum altitude over N D B , 1400'. MSA: 000°-360°—2300'. N ote: Use Grissom A F B altimeter setting. Day and N ight Minimums Cond. ------__?______®______D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS VIS 8-29...... 1400 1 610 1400 1 610 N A NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS TTA A C...... 1400 1 610 1400 1 610 N A NA A ------Not authorized; T 2-eng. or less—Standard. * T over 2-eng.—Standard. City, Rochester; State, Ind.; Airport name, Fulton County; Elev., 790'; Facility, B C R ; Procedure No. N D B (A D F ) Runway 29, Amdt. 1; Efl date lM a y 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 6 Mar. 69 » FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6391 14. By amending § 97.29 of Subpart C to establish instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic.. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except H A T , H A A , and B A. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation; Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet B V B . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M AP: ILS D H , 1264'; LOC 5.8 miles after From— To— Via altitudes passing R N LO M . (feet) B 223°, MKC V O R T A C CW...... - B N I LO C ...... 20-mile Arc M K C, R 262° 2700 Climbing right turn to 2700', proceed to lead radial. Manchester (M C ) LO M . B 331°, MKC V O B T A C CCW...... BNI LOC...... 20-mile Arc MKC, R 273° 2700 Supplementary charting information: T D Z lead radial. elevation, 1014'. 20-mile Arc...... Rondel! (B N I L O M . LO C ers______2700 Camden Int______Bondell (R N ) L O M ------Direct.;______2700 New Market Int______Rondell (B N ) LO M ______Direct______2700 Wood Int...... J...... Rondell (RN) LOM (NOPT). Direct______2700 Lansing Int______1 Rondell (R N ) LO M ______Direct...... * 2700 De Soto In t...... Rondell (R N ) LO M ...... Direct______2700 MKC V O R T A C ...... Rondell (R N ) LO M ...... Direct______2700 BSP V O R T A C ...... Rondell (R N ) LO M ...... Direct...... 2900 Manchester (MC) LO M ______Rondell (R N ) LO M ______j___ Direct...... 2700 Procedure tum S side of ers, 268° Outbnd, 088° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of R N LOM. FAF, R N LOM. Final approach ers, 088°. Distance F A F to M AP, 5.8 miles. Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 2700'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 2614'; at MM, 1214'. Distance to runway threshold at OM* 5.8 miles; at MM, 0,6 mile. MSA: 045°-135°—3100'; 135°-315°—2700'; 315°-045°—2800'. N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Inoperative components table does not apply to H IR L . • D ay and N ight Minimums A BC D Cond. DHVIS HAT DH VISHAT DH VISHATDHVIS HAT 8-9___ ...... 1264 * % 250 1264 V i 250 1264 ■ M 250 1264 'Á 250 LOC: MDA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDA .VISHAT MDAVIS HAT 8-9.... 1 266 1280 1 266 1280 1 266 1280 1 266 MDA VIS . HAA M D A . VISHAA MDA VIS HAAMDAVIS HAA C...... 1 515 1540 1 515 1540 VÁ 515 1580 2 555 A.... T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all T over 2-eng. —RVdt 24',, Runway 36; Standard all other other runways. runways. City, Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., Ii)25'; Facility, I-R N I; Procedure No. IL S Runway 9, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 1 May 69 Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum M A P: ILS D H , 1211'; LO C 4.4 miles after From— To— Via altitudes passing MC LOM. (feet) MKC VO RTAC______Manchester (MC) LO M ______Direct______2600 Climb to 2800' on M C I localizer BC to Farley Int______Manchester (MC) LO M ______.D ire ct______2600 Camden Int; or, when directed by A T C , Lansing Int__IIIH ■l______Manchester (MC) LO M ______Direct______2600 climbing left turn to 2600', proceed to De Soto Int. ______Manchester (MC) LO M (N O P T )__ . . . Direct______2500 Rondell (RN) LOM. Camden In t...... ______Manchester (MC) LO M ...-______Direct______2600 Supplementary charting information: T D Z Kondell (R N ) LOM. ______Manchester (MC) LO M ______Direct______2600 elevation, 1011'. BSP VORTAC.. ______Manchester (MC) LO M ______Direct______3000 turn W side of ers, 185° Outbnd, 005° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of MC LOM. rAi, MC LOM. Final approach ers, 005°. Distance F A F to M AP, 4.4 miles. "uminuin glide slope interception altitude, 2500'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 2470'. instance to runway threshold at OM, 4.4 miles; at MM, 0.6 mile. °-135°—2500'; 135°-225°—31007; 225°-315°—2700/; 315°-045°—2400'. Note: Radar vectoring. , D ay and Night Minimums A C D Cond. B/ DH VISHAT DHVISHAT DHVISHAT DHVIS HAT 8-36.. R V R 24 200 • 1211 R V R 24 200 1211 R V R 24 200 1211 R V R 24 200 LOC: MDA VISHAT MDAVIS HAT MDAVISHAT MDAVIS HAT 8-36.. R V R 24 309 1320 R V R 24 309 1320 R V R 24 309 1320 R V R 40 309 MDAVIS HAAMDA VIS HAA MDAVIS HAA MDAVIS HAA c,____ 1 515 1540 1 515 1540 515 1580 2 555 A___ T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other T over 2-eng. —R V R 24', Runway 36; Standard all other runways. runways. ftYt Kansas City; State, Mo.; Airport name, Kansas City International; Elev., 1025'; Facility, I-M C I; Procedure No. IL S Runway 36, Amdt. 6; Eft. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 4 Jan. 68 FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6392 RULES AND REGULATIONS 15. By amending § 97.31 of Subpart C to amend precision approach radar (PAR ) and airport surveillance radar (ASR) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach Procedure—T ype Radar Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL, except H A T , H A A , and R A . Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation .Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R V R . If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized for such airport by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be established with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final author ized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A ) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the author ized landing minimums, or (B) at Pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach. Except when'the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; (C) visual contact is not "established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D ) if landing is not accomplished. Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude 095° 235° 18 2000 1. For all runways: Descend aircraft to MDA after 000° 050° 10 2500 F A F 5 miles from threshold. 050° 360° 20 2500 2. Components inoperative table does not apply to 000° 360° 50 300Q H IR L and R E IL Runways 10R and 28R. and including the area bearing 170° clockwise to 235° from the Columbus Radar within 12 miles of Lockbourne A FB Supplementary charting information: TD Z eleva minimum altitude, 2000'. Radar control will provide 1000' vertical clearance within 3-mile radius of 1165' tower, 3 miles S tions: Runways 31. 809'; 10R, 810'; 1, 19, 23, 28B, and 1389' tower, 9 miles SW. 812'; 10L, 28L, 814'. Hold CM LOM E, 1 minute, right turns, 276° Inbnd. Hold CB LOM W, 1 min ute, right turhs, 096° Inbnd. Missed approach: Runways 10R, 10L, 1, 5,13, and 19: Climb to 2700' direct to CM LOM and hold. Runways 28L, 28R, 23, and 31: Climb to 2500' direct to CB LOM and hold. Day and N ight Minimums A BÇ D Cond. MDA VIS HAT M D A VIS. HAT MDA VISHAT MDA VIS HAT S-28L______1360 R V R 40 546 1360 R V R 40 546 1360 R V R 40 546 1360 R V R 50 546 S-28R___ ...... 1360 1 548 1360 1 548 1360 1 548 1360 m 548 S-10L______1300 R V R 40 486 1300 R V R 40 486 1300 R V R 40 486 1300 R V R 50 486 S-10R______1300 1 490 1300 1 490 1300 Is 490 1300 m 490 S-l__— ...... 1420 1 608 1420 1 608 NA NA S-19...... ______1300 1 488 1300 1 488 NA NA S-23...... ______1380 1 568 1380 1 568 NANA S-31...... ______1340 1 531 1340 1 531 NA . N A MDA VISHAAMDA VIS HAAMDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... - __...... 1420 1 604 1420 1 604 1420 1H 604 1420 2 604 A ...... ____... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—R V R 24', Runways 28L and 10L; Stand- T over 2-eng.-—RV R 24', Runways 28L and 10L; Standard ard all other runways. all other runways. City Columbus; State, Ohio’; Airport name, Port Columbus International; Elev., 816'; Facility, Columbus Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 10 Apr. 69 Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude As established by Laughlin A F B A S R minimum vectoring altitude chart. 1. Final approach within 3-mile radius of airport reference point from 100° clockwise to 340° within limits of Û.S. border. 2. Caution: 1612' tower, 3.2 miles SE, 1408' tower, , 3.5 miles N E , 1275' tower, 1.2 miles NE, and 1157 tower, 1 mile E of airport. 3. Radar antenna site at Laughlin AFB. 4. Use Laughlin A F B altimeter setting when Del Rio International altimeter setting is not received. *5. This procedure not available periods when Laughlin A F B Radar not operating. Contact H O U A R T C C prior to planned arrival to ascer tain facility will be in operation. JVL1SS6U approacu. Final approach from southeast—Climb to 4000', right turn to heading of 340° within 15 miles. Final approach from northwest—Climbing left turn to 4000' on heading of 340° within 15 miles. Day and Night Minimums A B C D MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS C*...... s.-...... 1700 1 701 1700 1 701 1700 1}4 701 N A A ...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—500-2 required Runway 13; Standard all T over 2-eng.—500-2 required Runway 13; Standard all other runways. other runways. Citv. Del Rio; State, Tex.; Airport name, Del Rio International; Elev., 99iP; Facility, Laughlin Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1. Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 1 May 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 25 July 68 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), 601, Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 Ü.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775) Issued in Washington, D.C., on March 25, 1969. R. S. Sliff, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. IF.R. Doc. 69-3872; Filed, Apr, 10, 1969; 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6393 Chapter V— National Aeronautics tain silver coins of the United States for porate or other device, in connection and Space Administration legitimate numismatic purposes is be with the advertising, offering for sale, ing amended to permit the export for sale or distribution of its services in the PART 1204— ADMINISTRATIVE such purposes and in unlimited quanti preparation, composition, or publication AUTHORITY AND POLICY ties of silver dollars and silver coins con of advertising or promotional material tained in uncirculated U.S. coin sets for its “Salesman’s Opportunity” maga Subpart 5— Delegations and bearing a date subsequent to 1967. zine or other publications in commerce, Designations Section 82.5 is hereby amended to read as “commerce” is defined in the Federal as follows: Trade Commission Act, do forthwith Execution of C ertificates of P u ll F aith cease and desist from: and C redit § 82.5 General authorization. 1. Preparing or assisting in the prepa Paragraph (b) of § 1204.505 Is amend The following listed silver coins of the ration of any advertisement which does ed to read as follows: United States are authorized to be ex not fully and accurately state and repre sent both directly and indirectly the per § 1204.505 Delegation o f authority to ported from the United States, without tinent information and material supplied execute certificates of full faith and further authorization from the Treasury to respondent, and the pertinent facts credit. Department if exported for legitimate oherwise known to respondent. ***** numismatic purposes: (a) Silver coins contained in 1965-67 2. Preparing or assisting in the prep (b) Delegation of authority. The fol U.S. Special Mint Sets, proof coin sets aration of any advertisement which con lowing NASA Headquarters officials are whenever minted and uncirculated coin tains matter or information which the delegated authority to execute certifi sets issued by the U.S. Mint and bearing respondent knew or should have known cates of full faith and credit (Office of a date subsequent to 1967. to be false or misleading. the Administrator section of NASA Form (b) Silver dollars of the United States. It is further ordered, That respondent 955) certifying the signatures and au corporation shall forthwith distribute a thority of employees of the National The foregoing amendment relieves an copy of this order to each of its operat Aeronautics and Space Administration, existing restriction and accordingly, no ing divisions. whenever such certification is required tice and public procedure thereon are It is f urther ordered, That the respond to authenticate copies of official records deemed unnecessary. It shall become ef ent herein shall, within sixty (60) days for possible admission in evidence in fective upon filing with the. F ederal after service upon it of this order, file judicial proceedings pursuant to 28 R egister. with the Commission a report, in writing, U.S.C. 1733 or any other statute: (Sec. 105, Coinage Act of 1965, Public Law setting forth in detail the manner and (1) General Counsel; 89-81, 31 U.S.C. 395) form in which it has complied with this order. (2) Deputy General Counsel; [ seal] T homas W . W olfe, (3) Associate General Counsel; Director, Office of Domestic Issued: March 13,1969. (4) Assistant General Counsels. Gold and Silver Operations. By the Commission. [ seal] Joseph W . S hea, (42 UJ3.C, 2 4 73 (b)(1 )) A pril 8, 1969. Secretary. [FJR. Doc. 69-4258; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Effective date. The provisions of 8:47 am .] [F.R. Doc. 69-4229; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; § 1204.505(b) are effective upon publica 8:45 ajn .] tion in the F ederal R egister. [Docket No. C-1505] Signed at Washington, D.C., on April 4,1969. Title 16— COMMERCIAL PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE PRACTICES T. O. P a in e , Administrator. PRACTICES Sydell WoronofF and Sydell Gowns Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission [F.R. Doc. 69-4242; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; Subpart— Concealing, obliterating or 8:46 a m .] [Docket No. C-1504] removing law required and informative PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE marking: § 13.512 Fur products tags or identification; § 13.523 Textile fiber Title 31— MONEY AND PRACTICES products tags or identification; § 13.525 Opportunity Publishing Co. WooZ products tags or identification. Subpart— Invoicing products falsely: FINANCE: TREASURY Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis § 13.1108 Invoicing products falsely: leadingly: § 13.15 Business status, ad 13.1108-45 Fur Products Labeling Act. Chapter I—-Monetary Offices, Depart vantages, or connections: 13.15-5 Ad ment of the Treasury Subpart— Misbranding or mislabeling: vertising and promotional services. § 13.1185 Composition: 13.1185-30 Fur PART 82— SILVER COIN Subpart— Misrepresenting oneself and Products Labeling Act; § 13.1212 For REGULATIONS goods— Business status, advantages or mal regulatory and statutory require connections: § 13.1553 Services. ments: 13.1212-30 Fur Products Label Authorization of Export of Silver (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets ing Act; 13.1212-80 Textile Fiber Prod Dollars in Unlimited Amounts or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 ucts Identification; 13.1212-90 Wool U.S.C. 45) [Cease and desist order, Oppor Products Labeling Act. Subpart— Ne The Silver Coin Regulations (31 CFR tunity Publishing Co., Chicago, 111., Docket glecting, unfairly or deceptively, to make Part 82) prohibit the export of silver C-1504, Mar. 13,1969] material disclosure: § 13.1852 Formal coins of the United States as defined in Consent order requiring a Chicago, HI., regulatory and statutory requirements: 1 82 3 of the regulations, from the United publisher of a monthly trade magazine 13.1852-70 Textile Fiber Products Iden except as specially authorized by to cease misrepresenting, exaggerating me Secretary of the Treasury or his del tification Act; 13.1852-80 Wool Prod and changing the copy material supplied ucts Labeling Act. egate.1 Section 82.5 which is a general it by its advertisers in the preparation of authorization permitting exports of cer- (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or its advertisements. apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, secs. The order to cease and desist, includ 2-5, 54 Stat. 1128-1130, sec. 8, 65 Stat. 179, iQftf66 Treasury Order 190 (Rev. 4) of Dec. 15, ing further order requiring report of 72 Stat. 1717; 15 U.S.C. 45, 68, 60f, 70) [Cease r,f Treasury Order 193-1 (Rev. 2) compliance therewith, is as follows: and desist order, Sydell Woronoff trading as TTnrtoic?6’ These orders delegate to the Sydell Gowns, New York, N.Y„ Docket C-1505, r>ir»r>+~SeCJ ^ ary for Monetary Affairs and the It is ordered, That respondent Oppor Mar. 13,1969] Office of Domestic Gold and Silver tunity Publishing Co., a corporation, and nn FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6394 RULES AND REGULATIONS garments to cease misbranding its wool, ing as Sydell Gowns, or under any other It is iurther ordered, That respondent textile fiber, and fur products and falsely name or names, and respondent’s rep Sydell Woronoff, individually and trad invoicing its fur products. resentatives, agents, and employees, di ing as Sydell Gowns, or under any other The order to cease and desist, includ rectly or through any corporate or other name or names, and respondent’s repre ing further order requiring report of device, do forthwith cease and desist from sentatives, agents, and employees, di compliance therewith, is as follows: removing or mutilating, or causing or rectly or through any corporate or other It is ordered, That respondent Sydell participating in the removal or mutila device, do forthwith cease and desist from Woronoff, individually and trading as tion of, the stamp, tag, label, or other removing or causing or participating in Sydell Gowns, or under any other name identification required by the Textile the removal of, prior to the time any fur or names, and respondent’s representa Fiber Products Identification Act to be product subject to the provisions of the tives, agents, and employees, directly or affixed to any textile fiber product, after Fur Products Labeling Act is sold and through any corporate or other devise, such textile fiber product has been delivered to the ultimate consumer, any in connection with the introduction into shipped in commerce and prior to the label required by the said Act to be affixed commerce, or offering for sale, sale, time such textile fiber product is sold to such fur products, without substituting transportation, distribution, delivery for and delivered to the ultimate consumer, therefor labels conforming to section 4 shipment or shipment, in commerce, of without substituting therefor labels con of said Act and the rules and regulations wool products, as “commerce” and “wool forming to section 4 of said Act and the promulgated thereunder, and in the product” are defined in the Wool Prod rules and regulations promulgated there manner prescribed by section 3(e) of ucts Labeling Act of 1939, do forthwith under and in the manner prescribed by said Act. - cease and desist from misbranding wool section 5(b) of said Act. It is further ordered, That the respond products by failing to securely affix to It is further ordered, That the respond ent herein shall, within sixty (60) days or place on each such product a stamp, ent Sydell Woronoff, individually and after service upon him of this order, file tag, label, or other means of identifica trading as Sydell Gowns, or under any with the Commission a report, in writing, tion showing in a clear and conspicuous other name or names, and respondent’s setting forth in detail the manner and manner each element of information re representatives, agents, and employees, form in which he has complied with this quired to be disclosed by section 4(a) directly or through any corporate or order. (2) of the Wool Products Labeling Act of other device, in connection with the in 1939. troduction into commerce, or the sale, Issued: March 13, 1969. It is further ordered, That respondent advertising or offering for sale in com By the Commission. Sydell Woronoff, individually and trad merce, or the transportation or distribu [ s e a l ] J o s e p h W. S hea, ing as Sydell Gowns, or under any other tion, in commerce, of any fur product; Secretary. name or names, and respondent’s agents, or in connection with the sale, adver representatives, and employees, directly tising, offering for sale, transportation [F.R. Doc. 69-4230; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; or through any corporate or other device, or distribution of any fur product which 8:45 a.m.] do forthwith cease and desist from re is made in whole or in part of fur which moving, or causing or participating in the has been shipped and received in com removal of, the stamp, tag, label, or other merce, as the terms “commerce,” “fur,” identification required by the Wool and “fur product” are defined in the Fur Title 42— PUBLIC HEALTH Products Labeling Act of 1939 to be af Products Labeling Act, do forthwith Chapter I— Public Health Service, De fixed to wool products subject to the pro cease and desist from: visions of such Act, prior to the time A. Misbranding any fur product by: partment of Health, Education, and any such wool product is sold and de 1. Failing to affix a label to such fur Welfare livered to the ultimate consumer, with product showing in words and in figures SUBCHAPTER G— PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND out substituting therefor labels conform plainly legible all of the information re ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION ing to section 4(a) (2) of said Act. quired to be disclosed by each of the sub It is further ordered, That respond sections of section 4(2) of the Fur Prod PART 81— AIR QUALITY CONTROL ent Sydell Woronoff, individually and ucts Labeling Act. REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CON trading as Sydell Gowns, or under any 2. Failing to set forth the term “nat TROL TECHNIQUES other name or names, and respondent’s ural” as part of the information required representatives, agents, and employees, to be disclosed on a label under the Fur Metropolitan St. Louis Interstate Air directly or through any corporate or Products Labeling Act and the rules and Quality Control Region (Missouri- other device, in connection with the in regulations promulgated thereunder to Illinois) troduction, delivery for introduction, describe such fur product which is not sale, advertising or offering for sale, in pointed, bleached, dyed, tip-dyed, or On December 21, 1968, notice of pro commerce, or the transportation or caus otherwise artificially colored. posed rule making was published in the ing to be transported in commerce, or the 3. Failing to set forth on a label the F ederal R egister (33 F.R. 19084) to importation into the United States, of item number or mark assigned to such amend Part 81 by designating the Metro any textile fiber product; or in connec fur product. politan St. Louis Interstate A ir Quality tion with the sale, offering for sale, ad B. Falsely or deceptively invoicing fur Control Region (Missouri-Illinois). vertising, delivery, transportation, or products by: Interested persons were afforded an causing to be transported, after ship 1. Failing to furnish invoices, as the opportunity to participate in the rule ment in commerce, of any textile fiber term “invoice” is defined in the Fur making through the submission of com product, whether in its original state or Products Labeling Act, showing in words ments, and a consultation with appro contained in other textile fiber products, and figures plainly legible all the infor priate State and local authorities pur as the terms “commerce” and “textile mation required to be disclosed in each suant to section 107 (a) of the Clean Air fiber product” are defined in the Textile of the subsections of section 5 (b )(1 ) of Act (42 U.S.C. 1857c-2(a)) was held on Fiber Products Identification Act, do the Fur Products Labeling Act. January 14, 1969. Due consideration has forthwith cease and desist from mis 2. Failing to set forth the term “nat been given to all relevant material branding such textile fiber products by ural” as part of the information required presented. failing to affix a stamp, tag, label, or to be disclosed on invoices under the Fur In consideration of the foregoing and other means of identification to each Products Labeling Act and rules and reg in accordance with the statement in tne such textile fiber product showing in a ulations promulgated thereunder to de notice of proposed rule making, tne clear, legible, and conspicuous manner scribe fur products which are not Metropolitan St. Louis Interstate Air each element of information required to pointed, bleached, dyed, or otherwise ar Quality Control Region (Missouri-Hli' be disclosed by section 4(b) of the Tex tificially colored. nois) is hereby designated and Part 81, tile Fiber Products Identification Act. 3. Failing to set forth on invoices the It is further ordered, That respondent item numbers or marks assigned to such as set forth below, is hereby amended Sydell Woronoff, individually and trad fur products. effective on publication. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL IT* 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 6395 § 81.18 Metropolitan St. Louis Inter ulations of the Office of the Secretary § 1033.1024 Service Order No. 1024. state Air Quality Control Region of Transportation is amended by delet (a) Union Pacific Railroad Co. au (Missouri-Illinois). ing § 1.5(1)(1). thorized to operate over tracks of the The Metropolitan St. Louis Interstate This action is taken under the author Southern Pacific Co. The Union Pacific Air Quality Control Region (Missouri- ity of section 9 of the Department of Railroad Co. be, and it is hereby, author Ulinois) consists of the territorial area Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1657). ized to operate over tracks of the South encompassed by the boundaries of the Since this amendment involves a dele ern Pacific Co. between a point of con following jurisdictions (including the gation of authority and relates to the nection between these companies at territorial area of all municipalities (as internal management of the Department, Union Pacific Railroad Co. milepost 10.9 defined in section 302(f) of the Clean notice and public procedure thereon are at Whittier Junction, Calif., and Long Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f) geographi not required and the amendment may Beach Harbor, Calif., a distance of 21.42 cally located within the outermost be made effective immediately. miles, or Los Angeles Harbor, Calif., a boundaries of the area so delimited): Issued in Washington, D.G., on April 8, distance of 25.12 miles. I n the State op Missouri 1969. (b) Application. The provisions of this order shall apply to intrastate and for St. Louis City. St. Louis County. J o h n V o l p e , St. Charles County. Jefferson County. Secretary of Transportation. eign traffic, as well as to interstate [F.R. Doc. 69-4256; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; traffic. I n the State op I llino is 8:47 a.m.] (c) Rates applicable. Inasmuch as this Madison County. Monroe County. operation by the Union Pacific Railroad St. Clair County. Co. over tracks of the Southern Pacific Chapter X— Interstate Commerce (Secs. 107(a), 301(a), 81 Stat. 490, 504; 42 Co. is deemed to be due to carrier’s dis Commission U.S.C. 1857c-2(a), 1857g(a)) ability, the rates applicable to traffic Dated: April 7,1969. SUBCHAPTER A— GENERAL RULES AND moved by the Union Pacific Railroad REGULATIONS R obert H. P i n c h , Co. over these tracks of the Southern Secretary. [S.O. 1024] Pacific Co. shall be the rates which were [F.R. Doc. 69-4225; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; PART 1033— CAR SERVICE applicable on the shipments at the time 8:45 a.m.] of shipment as originally routed. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Author (d) Effective date. This order shall ized To Operate Over Tracks of become effective at 12:01 a.m., April 10, Southern Pacific Co. 1969. Title 49— TRANSPORTATION At a session of the Interstate Com (e) Expiration date. The provisions of Subtitle A— Office of the Secretary merce Commission, Railroad Service this order shall expire at 11:59 p.m., Board, held in Washington, D.C., on the of Transportation September 30, 1969, unless otherwise 8th day of April 1969. modified, changed, or suspended by order [OST Docket No. 1, Arndt. 1-26] It appearing that because present of this Commission. PART 1— FUNCTIONS, POWERS, AND tracks and facilities of the Union Pacific Railroad Co. are inadequate to handle (Secs. 1, 12, 15, and 17(2), 24 Stat. 379, 383, DUTIES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF 384, as amended: 49 U.S.C. 1,12,15, and 17(2). certain trainload shipments of coal for TRANSPORTATION Interprets or applies sec. 1 (10-17), 15(4), and export via Long Beach Harbor, Calif., 17(2), 40 Stat. 101, as amended 54 Stat. 911; Removal of Reservation of Authority or Los Angeles Harbor, Calif.; that such 49 U.S.C. 1(10-17), 15(4), and 17(2)) Regarding Civil Penalties; Federal trainload shipments of coal can be transported via tracks of the Southern It is further ordered, That copies of Highway Administrator Pacific Co. between a point of connec this order shall be served upon the Asso The authority to impose civil penalties tion with the Union Pacific Railroad Co. ciation of American Railroads, Car Serv under the National Traffic and Motor at Union Pacific Railroad Co. milepost ice Division, as agent of the railroads Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (Public Law 10.9 at Whittier Junction, Calif., and subscribing to the car service and per Long Beach Harbor, Calif., a distance of 85-563) has been delegated by § 1.4(c) diem agreement under the terms of that (3) (i) to the Federal Highway Admin 21.42 miles, or Los Angeles Harbor, Calif., agreement; and that notice of this order istrator. However, the authority to com a distance of 25.12 miles; that the Com promise civil penalties under that Act mission is of the opinion that operation shall be given to the general public by de has been reserved to the Secretary of by the Union Pacific Railroad Co. over positing a copy in the Office of the Secre Transportation by § 1.5(1) (1). Since the this trackage of the Southern Pacific Co. tary of the Commission at Washington, authority to compromise civil penalties is necessary to enable the Union Pacific D.C., and by filing it with the Director, Railroad Co. to handle this traffic, in the Office of the Federal Register. is an essential element of the civil pen interest of the public and the commerce alty system, the purpose of this amend of the people; that notice and public By the Commission, Railroad Service ment is to remove that reservation and procedure herein are impractical and Board. to authorize the Administrator to impose contrary to the public interest; and that [ s e a l ] H . N e il G a r s o n , and compromise civil penalties. good cause exists for making this order Secretary. In consideration of the foregoing, ef effective upon less than 30 days’ notice: [F.R. Doc. 69-4251; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; fective April 8, 1969, Part 1 of the Reg It is ordered, That: 8:47 am .] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO, 49— FRIDAY« APRIL I V 1969 No. 69- 63% Proposed Rule Making ments of Marketing Order No. 953 (Part Act of 1964, as amended, for persons DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 953 of this chapter) applicable to pota among the long-term unemployed, toes of the round type shall be the respec handicapped, members of minority Consumer and Marketing Service tive grade, size, quality, and maturity groups, older workers, youth, and others [ 7 CFR Pari 980 1 requirements for imports of other round with similar problems as determined by type potatoes; and during the period Au the Administrator. [Arndt. 6 ] gust 1 through the following June 4 of If the Age Discrimination in Employ IRISH POTATOES each year the grade, size, quality, and ment Act is to be read in harmony with maturity requirements of Area No. 3, the totality of Federal statutes dealing Import Regulations Colorado (Northern Colorado) covered with special employment problems in Notice is hereby given of a proposed by Marketing Order No. 948, as amended accordance with established canons of amendment of § 980.1 Irish potato im (Part 948 of this chapter) shall be the re statutory construction, the act should port regulations (7 CFR 980.1 Irish po spective grade, size, quality, and matu not be read as interfering with.the afore tatoes, and 33 F.R. 4106), applicable to rity requirements for imports of all other mentioned activities and programs. Cf. the importation of Irish potatoes into round type potatoes. Southern Steamship Company v. Na the United States to become effective * * * * * tional Labor Relations Board, 316 U.S. 31, 47 (1942). However, in any event, June 8,1969, under the Agricultural Mar Consideration will be given to any section 9 of the act does permit the Sec keting Agreement Act of 1937, as amend written data, views, or arguments per retary of Labor to establish reasonable ed (7 UJ3.C. 601 et seq.). taining to the proposed amendment exemptions from its terms when it is Under section 8e-l of the Agricultural which are filed in quadruplicate with the found necessary and proper in the public Marketing Act of 1937, as amended (7 Hearing Clerk, Room 112, U.S. Depart interest. There would seem to be such U.S.C. 608e-l), whenever two or more ment of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. a public interest here. Indeed, many of marketing orders are concurrently in 20250, not later than 30 days after pub the programs are designed to meet the effect regulating the same agricultural lication of this notice in the F ederal R eg employment needs of older workers and commodity produced in different areas ister. All written submissions made pur to promote employment opportunities for of the United States, the importation of suant to this notice will be made available them. These are among the objectives such commodity shall be prohibited un for public inspection at the office of the of the act itself. less it complies with the grade, size, qual Hearing Clerk during regular business ity, and maturity provisions of the order hours (7 CFR 1.27 (b) ). Interested persons are hereby afforded which, as determined by the Secretary an opportunity to present data, views, or (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. arguments, concerning the proposal. of Agriculture, regulates the commodity 601-674) produced in the area with which the Such comments should be directed to imported commodity is in most direct Dated: April 7,1969. the Administrator of the Wage and Hour competition. and Public Contracts Divisions, U.S. De P aul A. N ic h o lso n , partment of Labor, Washington, D.C. In Irish potatoes import regulations Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg 20210, within 20 days following publica § 980.1 Irish potatoes (7 CFR 980.1 Irish etable Division, Consumer and tion of this notice in the F ederal potatoes) paragraph (a) subparagraph Marketing Service. R egister. (2) reads as follows: [F.R. Doc. 69-4241; Filed, Apr 10, 1969; During the period June 15 through July 31 8:46 a.m.] Signed at Washington, D.C., this sev of each marketing year, the grade, size, enth day of April 1969. quality, and maturity requirements of Mar B e n P. R obertson, keting Order No. 953 (Part 953 of this chap ter) applicable to potatoes of the round type Acting Administrator, Wage shall be the respective grade, size, quality, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and Hour and Public Con and maturity requirements for imports of Wage and Hour and Public Contracts tracts Divisions. other round type potatoes; and during the Divisions [F.R. Doc. 69-4261; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; period August 1 through the following June 8:48 a.m.] 14 of each year the grade, size, quality, and [ 29 CFR Part 850 ] maturity requirements of Area No. 3, Colo rado (Northern Colorado) covered by Mar AGE DISCRIMINATION IN keting Order No. 948, as amended (Part 948 of this chapter) shall be the respective grade, EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU size, quality, and maturity requirements for Exemptions imports of all other round type potatoes. CATION, AND WELFARE It is proposed that the time period Pursuant to section 9 of the Age Dis given in subparagraph (2) be revised crimination in Employment Act (29 Food and Drug Administration U.S.C. 628) and Secretary of Labor’s to coincide with the effective period of [ 21 CFR Pari 8 1 the regulation under Marketing Order Order No. 11-68 (33 F.R. 9690), it is No. 953 which is to begin June 5 of each hereby proposed to be found necessary COLOR ADDITIVES marketing year instead of June 15 of and proper in the public interest to each marketing year. amend Part 850 of Title 29, Code of Fed Order Denying Proposed Color eral Regulations, to exempt from the Therefore, the proposed amendment is Additive Regulations Act’s application activities and programs as follows: In § 980.1 Import regulation; under Federal contracts or grants or car In the matter of color additive peti Irish potatoes (7 CFR Part 980) subpar ried out by the public employment serv tions submitted by The Toilet Goods As agraph (2) of paragraph (a) is hereby ices of the several States designed pri sociation, the Pharmaceutical M anufac amended to read as follows: marily to provide employment, or to turers Association, and the Certified § 980.1 Import regulations; Irish pota encourage the employment, of persons Color Industry Committee, c/o Hazleton toes. with special employment problems. This Laboratories, Inc., Post Office Box 30, Falls Church, Va. 22046, proposing is (a) * * * would include employment activities and (2) During the period June 5 through programs under the Manpower Develop suance of regulations to provide for the July 31, of each marketing year, the ment and Training Act of 1962, as safe use of various color additives as grade, size, quality, and maturity require amended, and the Economic Opportunity follows: FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 6397 any time within 30 days after publica this purpose, both because of other nec Cap Color additive(s) Use No. tion hereof in the F ederal R eg ister file essary activities which have intervened, with the Hearing Clerk, Department of and the necessity for coordinating their Health, Education, and Welfare, Room comments, with the personnel of broad 26 Ext. D&C Yellow In drug and cosmetic No. 7. products that are 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., casting stations which he represents, in applied externally. Washington, D.C. 20201, written objec Cullum’s case, and in ABS’s with its 34 D&C Yellow No. Do. 7 and D&C tions thereto (preferably in quintupli- Technical Committee and Board of Yellow No. 8. cate). Objections shall show wherein the Directors. 35 D&C Orange No. 4.. Do. 36 FD&C Red No. 2... In foods, drugs, and person filing will be adversely affected by 5. W e believe it is in the public interest cosmetics. the order and specify with particularity to afford additional time in this proceed 37 D&C Violet No. 2-.- In drugs and cosmetics that are applied the provisions deemed objectionable and ing, but that the 90-day extension of externally. the grounds for the objections. If a hear time for filing comments is unnecessarily 38 D&C Red No. 34..-. Do. ing is requested, the objections must state long. 39 D&C Red No. 17.._. Do. 57 D&C Blue No. 6---- In ingested drugs, the issues for the hearing and such ob 6. We will allow an additional 60 days surgical sutures, jections must be supported by grounds for filing comments, and, in the light of lipsticks, and externally applied legally sufficient to justify the relief Cullum’s specific request, an additional drugs and cosmetics. sought. Objections may be accompanied 30 days thereafter for filing reply 58 D&C Red No. 30___ In ingested drugs, lip sticks, and drugs and by a memorandum or brief in support comments. cosmetics intended for thereof. 7. Accordingly, it is ordered, That the external application. time for filing comments is extended 61 FD&C Red No. 4.... In ingested drugs, mara Dated: April 4, 1969. schino cherries, and ex from April 7, 1969, to June 9, 1969, and ternally applied drugs H erbert L. L e y , Jr., the time for filing reply comments is ex and cosmetics. 62 D&C Yellow No. 10. In ingested drugs, lip Commissioner of Food and Drugs. tended from April 17, 1969, to July 9, sticks, and drugs and [F.R. Doc. 69--1231; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 1969. cosmetics for external application. 8:45 a.m.] 8. This action is taken pursuant to au 63 D&C Yellow No. 11. In ingested drugs and thority found in sections 4(i), 5(d)(1), drags and cosmetics for and 303 (r) of the Communications Act external application. 65 FD&C Green No. 3. In food, .ingested drugs, of 1934, as amended, and § 0.281(d) (8) lipsticks, and externally of the Commission’s rules. applied drags and cos FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS metics. Adopted: April 7,1969. 66 FD&C Yellow No. 6. In foods, drugs, and cos metics. COMMISSION Released: April 7,1969. 68 FD&C Violet No. 1.. In foods, dietary supple ments, ingested drugs, [ 47 CFR Part 73 ] and externally applied F ederal C ommunications drugs and cosmetics. [Docket No. 18471] C o m m is s io n , 84 D&C Green No. 5__ In ingested drags, lip [ s e a l] G eorge S. S m it h , sticks, and externally applied drugs and cos STANDARD BROADCAST STATIONS Chief, Broadcast Bureau. metics. 85 D&C Green No. 6... Do. Maintenance and Monitoring of Rela [F.R. Doc. 69-4246; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 86 D&C Red No. 33.... In ingested drugs, lip 8:46 a.m.] sticks, and drugs and tive Phases and Currents in Ele cosmetics for external ments of Directional Antennas; application. Order Extending Time for Filing I 47 CFR Part 73 1 Comments and Reply Comments . All of these petitions were filed Octo [Docket No. 18455] ber 7, 1968, and the notice of filing was In the matter of amendment of Part STANDARD BROADCAST STATIONS published in the F ederal R eg ister of 73 of the Commission’s rules and reg November 20, 1968 (33 F.R. 17205). ulations with respect to the maintenance Remote Indicating Phase Monitors Findings. 1. In each of the above- and monitoring of the relative phases and Inspection Requirements for identified color additive petitions, the and currents in the elements of direc Remotely Controlled Directional petitioner failed to submit adequate in tional antennas and to provide for type Stations; Order Extending Time for formation to establish that the color approval of phase monitors used by additives will be safe under the condi standard broadcast stations; Docket No. Filing Comments and Reply Com tions of use specified. 18471. ments 2. Although further information was 1. The notice of proposed rule making In the matter of amendment of Part requested from the petitioner, no new in this matter, adopted February 26, 73 of the Commission’s rules and regu data have been received. 1969, set April 7, 1969, and April 17, 1969, lations with respect to use of remote in 3. Litigation is now pending on appeal as the last dates for filing of comments dicating phase monitors and the m the Court of Appeals for the Second and reply comments, respectively. inspection requirements for remotely Circuit that will delineate the safety data 2. In a petition filed on March 26, controlled directional stations; Docket that will be required. 1969, A. Earl Cullum, Jr. (Cullum), of No. 18455. Conclusion. Regarding cosmetic use, the firm of consulting engineers of that 1. The notice of proposed rule making sufficient data are not available to sup name, requests that the period during in this'matter, adopted February 26, port the promulgation of color additive which comments may be filed be ex 1969, set April 7, 1969, and April 17, 1969, regulations in this matter pursuant to tended 30 days, specifically, to May 7, as the last dates for filing comments and section 706(b) of the Federal Pood, Drug, 1969. Citing the delays usually involved reply comments, respectively. and Cosmetic Act. in obtaining copies of comments, he 2. In a letter filed April 4, 1969, W il Order. Based on the aforesaid findings further asks that an additional 30 days liam J. Potts, Jr., attorney for the As and conclusion, the proposals of the beyond the deadline for filing comments sociation on Broadcasting Standards, petitioner to establish regulations under be permitted for filing reply comments. Inc. (A B S ), states that because of co section 706(b) of the act.to permit the 3. In a letter filed April 4, 1969, W il ordination procedures within the Asso Us.e *n cosmetics of the above-named liam J. Potts, Jr., attorney for the As ciation it will not be possible to submit color additives are denied: And it is so sociation on Broadcasting Standards, meaningful comments by the presently ordered, Pursuant to the provisions of Inc. (A B S ), requests that an additional specified deadline. He requests an addi tne act (sec. 706, 74 Stat. 399-407, as 3 months be afforded for filing com tional period of 90 days for this purpose, amended; 21 U.S.C. 376) and under au- ments and reply comments, until the until July 7, 1969. nf0™ y delegated to the Commissioner dates of July 7, 1969, and July 21, 1969. 3. We believe it in the public interest 01 * °°d and Drugs (21 CFR 2.120). 4. Both parties intend to file com to allow additional time, but consider 90 Person who will be adversely ments in this proceeding, but state that days to be an unnecessarily lengthy ected by the foregoing order may ait insufficient time has been allowed for period. W e will grant an additional 60 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6398 PROPOSED RULE MAKING days for comments, with 30 days there torque arm lug of the main landing gear of 4,400 hours’ time in service, inspect the after for reply comments. strut cylinder for cracks, and accom fillet area of the torque arm lug of th e ma.^ landing gear strut cylinder for cracks, in ac 4. Accordingly, it is ordered, That the plishing specified modifications on NAMC YS-11 and YS-11 A airplanes. cordance with procedures as outlined in time for filing comments is extended section 2A(1) of the service bulletin specified from April 7, 1969, to June 9, 1969, and Interested persons are invited to par in paragraph (f). the time for filing reply comments is ticipate in the making of the proposed (c) If the inspections required by para extended, from April 17, 1969, to July 9, rule by submitting such written data, graphs (a) or (b ) reveal one or more cracks, 1969. views, or arguments as they may desire. and the length of the crack or the su m of the lengths of all cracks is 0.47 inches (12mm) 5. This action is taken pursuant to au Communications should identify the docket number and be submitted in dup- or less in length, before further fligh t and thority found in sections 4(i) , 5(d)(1), without removing the strut cylinder from plicate to the Federal Aviation Admin and 303 (r) of the Communications Act the airplane, remove the cracks from the of 1934, as amended, and § 0.281(d) (8) istration, Office of the General Counsel, M.G.L. cylinder in accordance with proce of the Commission’s rules. Attention: Rules Docket, 800 Independ dures as outlined in section 2A(2 ) of the ence Avenue SW., Washington, D.C. service bulletin specified in paragraph (f). Adopted: April 7, 1969. 20590. All communications received on Observe the limitations on the material that can be removed. If material in excess of these Released: April 7, 1969. or before May 12, 1969, will be consid ered by the Administrator before taking limitations is removed, replace the cylinder number. F ederal C ommunications with a cylinder of the same part action upon the proposed rule. The pro Accomplish the surface finish work outlined C o m m is s io n , posals contained in this notice may be in section 2A(3) of the service bulletin speci [ s e a l ] G eorge S. S m it h , changed in the light of comments re fied in paragraph ( f ). Chief, Broadcast Bureau. ceived. All comments will be available, (d) If the inspections required b y para [FJR. Doc. 69-4247; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; both before and after the closing date graphs (a) or (b ) reveal one or more cracks, 8:46 a.m.] for comments, in the Rules Docket for and the length of the crack or the sum of examination by interested persons. the lengths of all cracks is greater th an 0.47 inch ( 12mm) in length, before further This amendment is proposed under the flight, remove the cylinder from the airplane authority of sections 313(a), 601, and 603 and perform the inspection and rem oval of DEPARTMENT OF of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 cracks procedures outlined in section 2B U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423), and section of the service bulletin specified in paragraph TRANSPORTATION 6(c) of the Department of Transporta (f). Observe the limitations on resulting tion Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)). thickness. I f prescribed dimensions cannot Federal Aviation Administration be maintained, replace the strut cylinder In consideration of the foregoing, it is with a new part of the same part number. [ 14 CFR Part 39 1 proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 of Accomplish the surface finish work outlined [Docket No. 9517] the Federal Aviation Regulations by add in section 2B(3) of the service b u lle tin spec ing the following new airworthiness ified in paragraph (f ). AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES directive: (e) If thè inspections required b y para graph (a) and (b) reveal no cracks, accom NAMC YS-11 and YS-11A Aircraft Nih o n . Applies to NAMC YS-11 and YS-11 A plish the surface finish work outlined in aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration section 2A(3) of the service bulletin specified Compliance required as indicated, unless in paragraph (f ). is considering amending Part 39 of the already accomplished. (f) Accomplish the inspections and re Federal Aviation Regulations by adding To prevent failure of the torque arm lug work required by paragraphs (a) through an airworthiness directive (AD ) appli of the main landing gear strut cylinders, ac (e) in accordance with NAMC Service Bul cable to NAM C YS-11 and Y S -1 1A air complish the following: letin 32-94 dated December 5, 1968, or any Japan Civil Aviation Bureau approved re craft. Cracks have been discovered in (a) For airplanes with main landing gear visions, or an FAA approved equivalent. the fillet area of the torque arm lug of strut cylinders which have accumulated 4,000 (g) Operators who have not kept records or more hours’ time in service on the effective the main landing gear strut cylinders on of hours’ time in service for individual main date of this AD, within the next 400 hours’ certain of these airplanes. If the lug is landing gear strut cylinders shall use air time in service, inspect the fillet area of the broken, the torque load cannot be ab plane hours’ time in service in lieu thereof. torque arm lug of the main landing gear sorbed and the piston rotates around the Issued in Washington, D.C., on April center of the cylinder, resulting in heavy strut cylinder for cracks, in accordance with procedures as outlined in section 2A(1) of the 4,1969. damage to the wheel and landing gear. service bulletin specified in paragraph ( f ). R. S. Sliff, Since this condition is likely to exist or (b) For airplanes with main landing gear Acting Director, develop in other airplanes of the same strut cylinders which have accumulated less Flight Standards Service. type design, the proposed airworthiness than 4,000 hours’ time in service on the effec [F.R. Doc. 69-4236; Filed, Apr. 10, 1968; directive would require inspection of the tive date of this AD, before the accumulation 8:45 a.m] FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69—-FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6399 Notices segments of the lines on the maps re 1. Exercise the power and authority of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ferred to in the aforesaid boundary no the Secretary of Housing and Urban De tices of May 28, and October 10, 1968, no velopment under section 1004 of the Bureau of Land Management changes in those maps are required. Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. WYOMING J. E. N. Jensen, 3371), with respect to the Program of Acting Director. Modification of Wyoming Grazing Assistance for Housing in Alaska, ex A pril 4, 1969. District No. 2 cept the authority to: [F.R. Doc. 69-4232; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; a. Establish the rate of interest on By virtue of the authority contained 8:45 am .] Federal loans. in the Act of June 28, 1934 (48 Stat. b. Approve the statewide program 1269; 43 U.S.C. 315, et seq.), as amended, prepared by the State of Alaska or any and pursuant to the authority delegated duly authorized agency or instrumental in 235 D.M. 1.1 (28 F.R. 2535), the fol DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ity thereof. lowing described lands are hereby added Maritime Administration 2. Redelegate to the Regional Admin to Wyoming Grazing District No. 2: istrator and the Deputy Regional Ad Sixth Principal Meridian BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ministrator, Region V I (San Francisco), T. 41 N., R. 90 W., TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIA any of the power and authority dele Sec. 31; TION gated under section A, 1, and authorize Sec. 32; further redelegation to Regional Office Sec. 33; Notice of Approval of Applicant as employees. Sec. 34; Trustee S ec. B. Additional authority delegated Sec. 35. to the Assistant Secretary for Renewal Jo h n O. C r o w , In F.R. Doc. 66-4724 appearing in the and Housing Assistance. The Assistant Associate Director. F ederal R egister issue of April 30, 1966 Secretary for Renewal and Housing As April 4, 1969. (31 F.R. 6551), notice was given that the sistance is further authorized to make Bank of America National Trust and such rules and regulations as may be [F.R. Doc. 69-4244; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; Savings Association had been approved 8:46 a.m.] necessary to carry out the power and au as a trustee pursuant to Public Law 89- thority delegated herein. 346 and 46 CFR 221.21-221.30. National Park Service (Sec. 7 (d) of the Department of HUD Act, Notice is hereby given that under a 42 U.S.C. 3535(d)) BIGHORN CANYON NATIONAL REC merger effected on April 1, 1969, the REATION AREA, MONT. AND WYO. survivor national banking association Effective date. This delegation of au assumed the name of the Bank of thority is effective as of April 11, 1969. Correction of Boundary Descriptions America National Trust and Savings As G eorge R o m n e y , sociation with offices at Bank of America There appeared in the F ederal R egis Secretary of Housing and Plaza, San Francisco, Calif., and that Urban Development. ter of May 28, 1968, at pages 7765-7767, said Bank of America National Trust and a description of the boundaries of the Savings Association has been approved [F.R. Doc. 69-4259; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Bighorn Canyon National Recreation as a trustee pursuant to Public Law 89- 8:47 a.m.] Area and in the F ederal R egister of 346 and 46 CFR 221.21-221.30. October 10, 1968, at pages 15128-15129, an adjustment of those boundaries. Dated: April 8, 1969. REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR AND These boundary determinations were M. I. G oodman, DEPUTY REGIONAL ADMINISTRA made by the Secretary of the Interior Chief, Office of Ship Operations. TOR, REGION VI (SAN FRAN under authority vested in him by the Act CISCO) of October 15, 1966 (80 Stat. 913; 16 [F.R. Doc. 69-4266; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; U.S.C. 460t). 8:49 a.m.] Redelegation of Authority With Re it is the purpose of this notice to cor spect to Program of Assistance for rect a minor technical error in each of Housing in Alaska the aforesaid descriptions as stated below: DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND S ection A. Authority redelegated to 1. Lot “6” in the seventh call appear- Regional Administrator and Deputy Re 2 * 111 Column 3 at page 7765 of the URBAN DEVELOPMENT gional Administrator, Region V I ( San May 28, 1968, notice should be changed ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND DEP Francisco). The Regional Administrator to lot “5” so that this call will read as and the Deputy Regional Administrator, follows: UTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR Region VI (San Francisco), each is RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSIST hereby authorized to: Thence westerly along the south line of lot ANCE 5. sec. 34, T. 56 N., R. 94 W., sixth princi- 1. Exercise the power and authority of Ts?i.(:ridiari’ to the east line of lot 411, Delegation of Authority With Respect the Secretary of Housing and Urban De • &5 N., R. 94 w., sixth principal meridian; velopment under section 1004 of the to Program of Assistance for Hous Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan ,_A. in the fifth call appearing ing in Alaska Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. first full paragraph beginning in S ection A. Authority delegated to the 3371), with respect to the Program of hprlfP at page 15129 oi the Octo- Assistance for Housing in Alaska, except to ««atii/1»68, n°tice should be changed Assistant Secretary and the Deputy As sistant Secretary for Renewal and Hous the authority to: follower S° c a l1 w111 rea FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6400 NOTICES 2. Redelegate to one or more em Accordingly, It is ordered, That: hold the proceeding in abeyance pursu ployees under his judisdiction the Action on agreement CAB 20745, R-48 ant to the Board’s so-called “Sherman authority delegated under section A, L through R-58, be and hereby is deferred Doctrine.” 1 On February 10, 1969, PSA (Secretary’s delegation effective Apr. 11, with a view toward eventual approval, filed a new pleading supplementing its 1969, 34 P.R. 6399, Apr. 11, 1969) provided that approval shall not consti motion by incorporating the terms of a tute approval of the specific commodity proposed trust agreement entered into Effective date. This redelegation of descriptions contained therein for pur with Charles S. Murphy, Esq., as trustee, authority is effective as of April 11,1969. poses of tariff publication. and alternatively requesting relief by way L aw rence M. Cox, Persons entitled to petition the Board of exemption from section 408, pursu Assistant Secretary for for review of this order, pursuant to ant to section 416 of the Act, to the ex Renewal and Housing Assistance. the Board’s regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, tent that the pendente lite voting trust may, within 7 days after the date of might be construed as a limited acquisi [F.R. Doc. 69-4260; Plied, Apr. 10, 1969; service of this order, file such petitions 8:48 am .] tion of control of Western by PSA* in support of or in opposition to our The pertinent features of the voting proposed action herein. trust agreement, which has with modi This order will be published in the fications, been patterned after trusts CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD F ederal R egister. which have previously been approved by the Board in connection with the liqui [Docket No. 18388] [ seal] H arold R. S anderson, dation of stock holdings required by the Secretary. FLYING TIGER ADDITIONAL POINTS Board to be divested,* are: That it is [P.R. Doc. 69-4262; Piled, AprT 10, 1969; irrevocable pending Board action on Notice of Postponement of Hearing 8:48 am .] PSA’s control application; * that Charles S. Murphy, Esq., or a successor trustee,6 Notice is hereby given that the hearing shall be entitled to vote the shares of in the above-entitled proceeding set for [Docket No. 20335] stock held in the trust for all purposes in May 6,1969, will be held on May 12, 1969 MOHAWK AIRLINES, INC. accordance with his best judgment, with at 10 a.m., e.d.t., in Room 726, Universal full power in his discretion to designate Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Notice of Hearing others not affiliated with PSA as voting Washington, D.C. Mohawk Airlines, Inc., Subpart M proxies; and that nothing in the trust Dated at Washington, D.C., April 7, (Boston-Syracuse-Cleveland). agreement shall impair PSA’s rights to 1969. Notice is hereby given, pursuant to sell, pledge or otherwise encumber its beneficial interest in the stock. In addi [ seal] M erritt R tjhlen, the provisions of the Federal Aviation tion, PSA expresses its willingness to Hearing Examiner. Act of 1958, as amended, that a hearing in the above-entitled matter is assigned modify the trust in any reasonable fash [P.R. Doc. 69-4264; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; to be held on April 29, 1969, at 10 a.m„ ion the Board might deem necessary in 8:48 a m ]. d.s.t., in Room 726, Universal Building, order to accomplish the purpose of in 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Wash suring the continued independence of [Docket No. 18650; Order 69-4-35] ington, D.C., before Examiner Ross I. Western pending the Board proceeding. Newmann. In support of its request for interim INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT relief PSA generally asserts that every Dated at Washington, D.C., April 8, ASSOCIATION effort has been made to insure that West 1969. ern will, pending Board approval of Order Regarding Specific [ seal] R alph L. W iser, Commodity Rates Associate Chief Examiner. 1 Sherman Control and Interlocking Rela Issued under delegated authority on [P.R. Doc. 69-4265; Piled, Apr. 10, I960; tionships, 15 CAB 876, 881 ( 1952). Th e Board April 7, 1969. 8:48 a.m.] there established the doctrine that, in the An agreement has been filed with the absence of exceptional circumstances, Board pursuant to section 412(a) of the wherever it appeared that a control or in [Docket No. 20592; Order 69-4r-39] terlocking relationship had been unlawfully Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) established prior to Board approval under and Part 261 of the Board’s economic PACIFIC SOUTHWEST AIRLINES sections 408 and 409 of the A ct, the Board regulations, between various air carriers, Order Setting Preliminary Motion would not consider an application for ap foreign air carriers, and other carriers, proval on its merits until the unlawful rela embodied in the resolutions of the Joint for Oral Argument tionship had been voluntarily terminated, Conferences of the International Air Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board or a proceeding was completed to determine Transport Association (IA T A ), and the existence of a,violation and corrective at its office in Washington, D.C., on the action had been taken. adopted pursuant to the provisions of 8th day of April 1969. *P S A also filed a reply to an answer ol Resolution 590 dealing with specific com By application filed December 24,1968, Western, on Jan. 15, 1969, accompanied by a modity rates. Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) re motion for leave to file an otherwise unau The agreement, adopted pursuant to quests approval of its acquisition of con thorized document; and on Peb. 26, 1969, a unprotested notices to the carriers and trol of Western Air Lines, Inc. (Western), reply to Western’s answer to its February 10tn promulgated in an IA TA letter dated through an acquisition of a controlling pleading. In view of the com plicated ques March 17,1969, names additional specific tions raised by this proceeding we shall ac portion of the latter carrier’s outstand cept all documents filed. commodity rates, as set forth in the at ing capital stock. PSA contemplates that tachment hereto,1 which reflect signifi »See, Hughes-TWA-Atlas-Northeast, Com the Western stock will be acquired pursu mon Control, 27 CAB 155, 157-161 (1958); cant reductions from the general cargo ant to a tender offer to Western’s share Seaboard and Western Airlines, Agreemen , rates. In addition, a rate for a new com holders whereby PSA will exchange 1.8 32 CAB 1322, 1325-26 (I960); Atlas Corpora modity description, “Aluminum Window shares of its own stock for each Western tion, Interlocking Relationships, 31 CAB > Frames,” has been specified. share tendered pursuant to the offer. By 2 (1960). Pursuant to authority duly delegated motion filed on the same date, PSA re 'f Alternatively the trust w ill terminate by the Board in the Board’s regulations, quests a preliminary ruling from the Jan. 31, 1974, unless extended with the ap 14 CFR 385.14, it tentatively is not found Board that the acquisition of a control proval of the Board, coupled with a req ment that PSA divest itself of the stock p that the subject agreement is adverse to ling portion of Western’s outstanding to such termination date. the public interest or in violation of the stock by PSA pursuant to its tender offer, e Provision is made for selection of a sue Act, provided that tentative approval and the placement of such stock into an cessor trustee through the confid entia thereof is conditioned as hereinafter irrevocable voting trust with an inde mission by PSA of three names to the ordered. pendent voting trustee, pending Board with the right to select any one o . decision on its control application, would unless the Board shall within 10 days 1 Filed as part of the original document. not be deemed grounds upon which to an alternate method of selection. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 NOTICES 6401 PSA’s section 408(b) application, con far more consistent with the public a result which could, under many cir tinue to operate as an independent com interest.10 cumstances, be significantly detrimental petitive airline; that grant of the re PSA’s application raises novel and to the public interest. In addition, PSA quested relief is necessary and in the complex questions concerning the ap alleges that a voting trust arrangement public interest as the only feasible means propriateness of a voting trust as a of the general type proposed is the only by which the acquisition, pursuant to the vehicle for insulation of control prior to feasible means by which acquisition of proposed tender, can be accomplished; Board approval of the control relation control can be effectuated (where a tend and that the arrangement would not be ship pursuant to the requirements of er to a large number of small stock inconsistent with Board precedents® or section 408 of the Federal Aviation Act. holders is necessary). Western, on the the requirements of section 408 of the Not only do these questions arise with other hand, urges that PSA’s objections Federal Aviation Act, as amended. It is respect to the particular terms of the can reasonably be met by alternative further urged that failure to grant the trust as proposed, but in addition there arrangements which would be consistent relief requested would have serious im exist significant questions as to whether with the requirements of section 408 of plications for the air transport industry the trust could be modified to bring it the Act and the public interest. as a whole, in that it would in effect pre into conformity with the requirements The determination as to whether (and clude Board consideration on the merits and objectives of the Federal Aviation if so, the determination of the extent to of acquisitions by air carriers, or other Act, and Board policy thereunder. More which) the interim relief sought by PSA section 408 enterprises, where circum over, to the extent that it is determined should be granted will have an impact stances are such that the tender proce that the voting trust arrangement would that may transcend the particular cir dure must be followed.7 constitute an acquisition of control with cumstances presented by PSA’s motion. Western has filed various pleadings in the meaning of section 408 of the Act, Hence, the Board has concluded that it opposing PSA’s request for interim serious questions are presented as to should hear oral argument on the issues; relief.8 Generally, Western asserts that whether, under the circumstances here and in connection therewith, the Board the trust arrangement would result in present, the Board could or should never desires that the parties focus attention an unlawful acquisition of control of theless permit consummation of the particularly on the following questions: Western by PSA; that permitting its im arrangement through a temporary pen 1. Would the placing of Western stock plementation by grant of the requested dente lite waiver of its jurisdiction, or in the proposed voting trust, in and of relief would be inconsistent with the re limited approval by exemption, or itself, result in PSA acquiring control of quirements and objectives of the Federal otherwise.11 Western, within the meaning of section Aviation Act and Board precedents,® The public interest considerations pre 408? sented by PSA’s application are also not would adversely affect Western’s man 2. If so, would a modification of var easily resolved. Thus, Western asserts ious terms of the trust be sufficient to agement and shareholders, and would be that the holding of a controlling block of provide for effective insulation of PSA contrary to the public interest; and that its stock in the voting trust pending control, so as not to be in violation of there are available reasonable alterna Board action on PSA’s application for section 408 of the Act, particularly with tive means by which PSA could lawfully approval of control, and the PSA power respect to: pursue its objectives, which would be of, as well as the effect of, disposition of a. Provisions which would eliminate such stock in the event of disapproval, any discretion in the trustees in voting would have severe repercussions on West the stock;13 * It is pointed out that such arrangements ern’s management and stockholders. In b. Provisions restricting the power of have been sanctioned by the ICC and the effect, such an arrangement creates an courts. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. disposition of the stock by PSA (i) to unalterable change in the status quo, preclude transfer as a controlling block, United States, 263 F. Supp. 421, 429 (N.D. prior to Board consideration of the HI., 1967), aff’d. per curiam 385 U.S. 457 (ii) to require that disposition be effected (1967)i Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Com- merits of the application, which could by the trustee, free from PSA direction pany-Control-Chicago South Shore & South well be considered to be inconsistent with or influence, in a specified time period Bend Railroad, 330 ICC 477 (1966). the policies of the Board expressed in the following Board disapproval of PSA’s 7 Such circumstances would include the Sherman case and other Board prece acquisition of control, or (ill) other sim absence of management cooperation, or the dents with respect to voting trusts of this ilar arrangements providing for effective making of a tender offer competitive with nature. PSA asserts, on the other hand, that of a nonseotion 408 enterprise, where or automatic disposition of the stock that denial of the interim relief requested upon disapproval; the shareholdings of the airline are widely would in effect amount to preclusion of held. ' c. Specific provisions precluding PSA a whole class of corporate transactions 8 An answer was filed on Jan. 6, 1969; ‘a for the transfer of the control of airlines, from in any manner directing, influenc supplemental answer (accompanied by a ing or suggesting the manner in which without the Board ever having a chance motion for leave to file an otherwise un the trustee shall exercise his trust, and to pass upon the merits of the transfer; authorized document) in response to PSA’s directing the trustee to refrain from act reply was filed on Jan. 27, 1969; and an an ing in accordance with the direction, in swer to PSA’s request for an alternative ex- 10 Specifically, it is suggested that it would fluence, or suggestions 6f PSA; mption and supplement to its motion for be entirely feasible for PSA to make its ® preliminary ruling, was filed on February tender offer conditioned upon Board ap d. Other provisions which would ef proval of the acquisition of control, thereby fectively insulate the trustee from PSA Western points out that the Board permitting the present Western, shareholders control or influence? a simllar request for relief in con- to retain their voting rights and interests in 3. Would implementation of the trust Wlth West c °ast’s acquisition of the the Western shares pending Board action on arrangement, as proposed, or as modified ®wck of Pacific Air Lines (see West Coast PSA’s control application, and that the , ^ Enforcement, Order E-22248, June retained rights could be made negotiable dur in the manner suggested by 2 above, be APP- 5-6), and has on several oc- ing such interim period by issuance of negoti consistent with the public interest and I.n_ ns Previously rejected voting trust ar- able “Certificates o f Deposit.” See Chicago the continued proper management of Sllla^ e»ts utilized, for the purpose o f in & N.W. Ry. Co. Certificates o f Deposit, 328 Western during the period pending ti, control prior to Board approval of I.C.C. 126; 328 1X3.C . 140 (1965). It is also of as distinct from liquidation suggested that there is no urgency hero “ For example, the trust might require that to * J ™ iou sly acquired interest pursuant present which would require that the tender the stock be voted In the manner specified or FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6402 NOTICES Board action on PSA’s application for of the proposals would better provide a 7. Except as indicated below, the appli acquisition of control? fair, efficient, and equitable distribution cants are qualified to construct and oper 4. Pending Board action on PSA's apof radio service, a contingent compara ate as proposed. However, because of plication for acquisition of control, tive issue will also be specified. their mutual exclusivity, the Commis would an alternative means of proce 3. According to its application Hender sion is unable to make the statutory find dure 13 be more consistent with the pub sonville Broadcasting Corp., Inc., would ing that a grant of the applications lic interest and objectives of the Federal require approximately $59,254 to con would serve the public interest, conveni Aviation Act? struct and operate for 1 year without ence, and necessity, and is of the opinion Should the parties desire to submit reliance on revenues. To meet this re that the applications must be designated further documents with respect to the quirement it proposes to rely on existing for hearing on the issues set forth below. issues raised herein, they will be consid capital, new capital, and bank loan. The 8. It is ordered, That, pursuant to sec ered by the Board provided that they are applicant’s balance sheet, however, fails tion 309(e) of the Communications Act filed not later than seven (7) calendar to reveal any cash or other liquid assets of 1934, as amended, the applications are days prior to the date set for oral argu in excess of liabilities and the bank loan designated for hearing in a consolidated ment herein. on which it relies has expired by its own proceeding, at a time and place to be Accordingly, it is ordered: terms. As to the stockholders who are to designated in a subsequent order, upon 1. That the issues raised by PSA’s mo provide the new capital, documentation is the following issues: tion for a preliminary ruling, and re lacking to demonstrate their ability to (1) To determine whether Henderson quest in the alternative for an exemp meet their commitments. The balance ville Broadcasting Corp. has available to tion, shall be set for oral argument be sheets for all but Fauble fail to show it the $59,254 required for construction fore the Board on April 28, 1969, at 10 liquid assets in excess of liabilities and and first-year operation to thus demon a.m., e.d.s.t., in Room 1027, Universal Fauble’s balance sheet fails to list his strate its financial qualifications. Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue N W „ liabilities. As a result, no credit can be (2) To determine whether Great Washington, D.C.; and given to these sources of funds. Accord Southern Broadcasting Co. has available 2. That the respective motions of PSA ingly, an issue will be specified to deter to it the required $15,000 for construction and Western for leave to file an other mine the availability of the required and first-year operation to thus demon wise unauthorized document be and $59,254. strate its financial qualifications. they hereby are granted. 4. According to its application Great (3) To determine the efforts made by Southern Broadcasting Co. would re Great Southern Broadcasting Co. to as This order shall be published in the quire $15,000 for construction and first certain the community needs and inter F ederal R e g ist e r . year operation. Applicant bases this low ests of the area to be served and the By the Civil Aeronautics Board. figure on having most of the equipment means by which the applicant proposes on hand and on joint operation with a to meet those needs and interests. [ s e a l ] H arold R . S a n d e r so n , (4) To determine the efforts made by Secretary. companion AM station. To meet this re quirement, applicant relies on a bank Hendersonville Broadcasting Corp. to [F.R. Doc. 69-4263; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; loan also to have been used for construc ascertain the community needs and in 8 :4 8 a j n . ] tion of his AM station but the amount terests of the area to be served and the available over and above the needs of means by which the applicant proposes the AM is not made clear and the loan to meet those needs and interests. in any event has expired. Thus, no credit (5) To determine the areas and popu FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS can be given for'this item. Nor can it lations which would receive F M service be given for the liquid assets shown on of 1 mv/m or greater intensity from the COMMISSION the applicant’s balance sheet since it is respective proposals and the availability very much out of date. This being the of other FM services of 1 mv/m or [Docket Nos. 18517, 18518; FCC 69-327] case, applicant has not shown the avail greater intensity in such areas. GREAT SOUTHERN BROADCASTING ability of the needed funds and an issue (6) To determine, in the light of sec CO. AND HENDERSONVILLE will be specified. tion 307 (b) of the Communications Act 5. In Suburban Broadcasters, 30 FCC of .1934, as amended, which of the pro BROADCASTING CORP., INC. 1020, 20 R R 951 (1961), and our public posals would better provide a fair, effi Order Designating Applications for notice of August 22, 1968 (FCC 68-847), cient, and equitable distribution of radio Consolidated Hearing on Stated we indicated that applicants were ex service. pected to provide full information on Issues (7) To determine, in the event it is their awareness of and responsiveness to concluded that a choice between applica In re applications of William O. Barry, local community needs and interests. tions should not be based solely on con trading as Great Southern Broadcasting Both of the applicants appear to have siderations relating to section 307(b), Co., Donelson, Tenn., requests: 92.1 mcs, made adequate surveys, but neither had which of the proposals would, on a com No. 221; 3 kw; 233 feet, Docket No. 18517, adequately listed the suggestions re parative basis, better serve the public File No. BPH-6010; Hendersonville ceived. Thus, we are unable at this time interest. Broadcasting Corp., Inc., Hendersonville, to determine whether either of the ap (8) To determine, in the light of the Tenn., requests: 92.1 mcs, No. 221; 3 kw; plicants is aware of and responsive to the evidence adduced pursuant to the fore 300 feet, Docket No. 18518, File No. B P H - needs of the area. Accordingly, Suburban going issues which, if either, of the ap 6296; for construction permits. issues are required. plications should be granted. 1. The Commission has under consid 6. Great Southern Broadcasting Co; proposes 50 percent duplicated program 9. It is further ordered, That to avail eration the above-captioned and de themselves of the opportunity to be scribed applications which are mutually ing while Hendersonville Broadcasting Corp. proposes independent program heard, the applicants, pursuant W exclusive in that operation by the appli § 1.221(c) of the Commission’s rules, m cants as proposed would result in mu ing. Therefore, evidence regarding pro gram duplication will be admissible un person or by attorney shall, within tually destructive interference. der the contingent comparative issue. twenty (20) days of the mailing of this 2. The respective proposals, although When duplicated programing is proposed, order, file with the Commission in tripli for different communities, would serve the showing permitted under the com cate, a written appearance stating an substantial areas in common. Conse parative issue will be limited to evidence intention to appear on the date fixed io quently, in addition to determining, pur concerning the benefits to be derived the hearing and present evidence on tn suant to section 307(b) of the Communi from the proposed duplication, and a full issues specified in this order. cations Act of 1934, as amended, which comparison of the applicants’ program 10. It is further ordered, That the ap proposals will not be permitted in the ab plicants herein shall, pursuant to section “ Including, but not limited to, a condi sence of a specific programing inquiry— 311(a) (2) of the Communications Act oi tional tender offer effectuated through nego Jones T. Sudbury, 8 FCC 2d 360, FCC 67- 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of tn tiable "Certificates of Deposit.” 614 (1967). Commission’s rules, give notice of tn FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 1 , 1969 NOTICES 6403 hearing, either individually or, if feasible their awareness of and responsiveness to the hearing, either individually or, if and consistent with the rules, jointly, local community needs and interests. A l feasible and consistent with the rules, within the time and in the manner pre though Jaco, Inc., appears to have made jointly, within the time and in the man scribed in such rule, and shall advise the an adequate survey, it has failed to list ner prescribed in such rule, and shall Commission of the publication of such the suggestions it received. Thus, we are advise the Commission of the publication notice as required by § 1.594(g) of the unable at this time to determine whether of such notice as required by § 1.594(g) of rules. it is aware of and responsive to the needs the rules. of the area. Accordingly, a Suburban Adopted: April 2,1969. Adopted: April 2,1969. issue is required. Released: April 8,1969. 4. Jaco, Inc., proposes approximately Released: April 8,1969. 50 percent duplicated programs while F ederal C ommunications F ederal C ommunications K A K E -T V and Radio, Inc., proposes no C o m m is s io n ,1 C o m m is s io n ,1 more than 10 percent duplicated pro [ seal] B e n F . W a p l e , [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , Secretary. grams. Therefore, evidence regarding Secretary. program duplication will be admissible [PH. Doc. 69-4250; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; [P H . Doc. 69-4249; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; under the standard comparative issue. 8:46 a.m.] 8:47 a.m.] When duplicated programing is pro posed, the showing permitted under the [Docket Nos. 18515, 18516; FCC 69-326] standard comparative issue will be [Docket No. 18514; PCC 69-320] limited to evidence concerning the bene LEE ENTERPRISES, INC. JACO, INC., AND KAKE-TV AND fits to be derived from the proposed dup RADIO, INC. lication, and a full comparison of the Order Designating Application for applicants’ program proposals will not be Hearing on Stated Issues Order Designating Applications for permitted in the absence of a specific Consolidated Hearing on Stated programing inquiry— Jones T. Sudbury In re application of Lee Enterprises, Issues 8 FCC 2d 360, FCC 67-614 (1967). Inc., Billings, Mont., requests: 98.5 mcs, 5. Except fis indicated below, the ap No. 253; 25 kw (H ) 25 k w (V ); 611 feet, In re applications of Jaco, Inc., plicants are qualified to construct and Docket No. 18514, File No. BPH-6297, for Wichita, Kans., Requests: 95.1 mcs, No. operate as proposed. However, because of construction permit. 236; 100 kw; 962 feet, Docket No. 18515, their mutual exclusivity, the Commission 1. The Commission has under consid File No. BPH-6430; KAKE-TV and Ra is unable to make the statutory finding eration the above-captioned application dio, Inc., Wichita, Kans., Requests: 95.1 that a grant of the applications would for a new FM statiQn at Billings, Mont. mcs, No. 236; 100 kw;. 700 feet, Docket serve the public interest, convenience and 2. The applicant corporation is also No. 18516, File No. BPH-6500; for con necessity, and is of the opinion that the licensee or permittee of Stations W TA D struction permits. applications must be designated for hear AM and FM, Quincy, 111.; K G LO -A M and 1. The Commission has under con ing on the issues set forth below. TV, Mason City, Iowa; K E YC -FM and sideration the above captioned and de 6. It is ordered, That, pursuant to sec TV, Mankato, Minn.; WMDR(FM), Mo scribed applications which are mutually tion 309(e) of the Communications Act line, HI.; and KH Q A-TV, Hannibal, Mo.; exclusive in that operation by the appli of 1934, as amended, the applications are and has interests in newspapers pub cants as proposed would result in mutu designated for hearing in a consolidated lished in Billings, Mont., and elsewhere. ally destructive interference. proceeding, at a time and place to be 3. After careful consideratioii of the 2. Jaco, Inc., estimates that it would specified in a subsequent order, upon the application before us, we have concluded cost $342,869 to construct its proposed following issues: that the multiple ownership situation station and additional $14,000 to operate (1) To determine the funds reasonably here involved raises substantial questions it for 1 year without reliance on reve required by Jaco, Inc., for construction as to concentrate of control of media of nues. Although these figures appeared to and first-year operation of its proposed mass communications and as to whether be reasonable for Jaco, Inc.’s, original station and its ability to provide these a grant would serve the public interest. proposal, that proposal has been altered funds to thus determine its financial 4. The applicant is qualified in other to specify a substantially lower tower. qualifications. respects, but in view of the foregoing, While the costs #would be reduced as a (2) To determine the efforts made by we find that the application must be des result, Jaco, Inc., has not amended the Jaco, Inc., to ascertain the community ignated for evidentiary hearing on the financial portion of the application to needs and interests of the area to be issues set forth below. reflect this reduction. In addition, re served and the means by which the ap 5. It is ordered, That pursuant to sec liance on deferred payments for equip plicant proposes to meet those needs and tion 309(e) of the Communications Act ment is indicated, but no manufacturer’s interests. of 1934, as amended, the application is letter to this effect has been submitted. (3) To determine which of the pro designated for hearing at a time and As a consequence of both of these mat posals would, on a comparative basis, place to be specified in a subsequent or ters we are unable to determine Jaco, better serve the public interest. der, upon the following issues. mc.’s, anticipatable first-year costs. (4) To determine in the light of the (1) To determine whether a grant of Similarly, we have a problem with its evidence adduced pursuant to the fore this application would tend to create sources of funds. Its balance sheet going issue, which of the applications an undue concentration of control over dicates that current liabilities exc< for construction permit should be media of mass communications. current assets; consequently its reliai granted. (2) To determine in light of the evi on existing capital is misplaced. So '7. It is further ordered, That to avail dence adduced pursuant to the foregoing with the loan, from a stockholder themselves of the opportunity to be issue, whether a grant of the subject which it relies, since no agreement heard, the applicants, pursuant to § 1.- application would serve the public in Balance sheet from him has been p 221(c) of the Commission’s rules, in per terest, convenience, and necessity. Tided, and with the loan from a b£ son or by attorney shall, within twenty 6. It is further ordered, That to avail which likewise lacks documentati (20) days of the mailing of this order, itself of the opportunity to be heard, the at present, it cannot be credi file with the Commission in triplicate, a applicant, pursuant to § 1.221(c) of the with any of the required funds and written appearance stating an inten Commission’s rules, in person or by at appropriate issue will be specified. tion to appear on the date fixed for the torney shall, within twenty (20) days of i r i 1« Suburban Broadcasters, 30 F hearing and present evidence on the the mailing of this order, file with the ¡ 2 ’ 20 RR 951 (1961), and our pul issues specified in this order. Commission in triplicate, a written ap notice of August 22, 1968 (FCC 68-84 8. It is further ordered, That the appearance stating an intention to appear rw.t j icated that applicants were plicants herein shall, pursuant to sec ed to provide full information tion 311(a)(2) of the Communications 1 Commissioner Robert E. Lee concurring Act of 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of in the result; Commissioner Wadsworth ab Commissioner Wadsworth absent. the Commission’s rules, give notice of sent. FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL M , 1969 No. 69------5 6404 NOTICES on the date fixed for the hearing and charges of currently effective rate sched sion its agreement and undertaking to present evidence on the issues specified ules for sales of natural gas under Com comply with the refunding and report in this order. mission jurisdiction, as set forth in ing procedure required by the Natural 7. It is further ordered, That the appliAppendix A hereof. Gas Act and § 154.102 of the regulations cant herein shall, pursuant to section The proposed changed rates and thereunder, accompanied by a certifi 311(a) (2) of the Commission’s rules, give charges may be unjust, unreasonable, notice of the hearing, within the time and unduly discriminatory, or preferential, cate showing service of copies thereof in the manner prescribed in such rule, or otherwise unlawful. . upon all purchasers under the rate and shall advise the Commission of the The Commission finds: It is in the schedule involved. Unless Respondents publication of such notice as required by public interest and consistent with the are advised to the contrary within 15 § 1.594(g) of the rules. Natural Gas Act that the Commission days after the filing of their respective enter upon hearings regarding the law Adopted: April 2,1969. agreements and undertakings, such fulness of the proposed changes,, and • Released: April 8,1969. that the supplements herein be suspended agreements and undertakings shall be F ederal C ommunications and their use be deferred as ordered deemed to have been accepted.2 C o m m is s io n ,1 below. (C) Until otherwise ordered by the [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , The Commission orders: Commission, neither the suspended sup Secretary, (A ) Under the Natural Gas Act, par plements, nor the rate schedules sought 1 Dissenting statement of Commissioner ticularly sections 4 and 15, the regula to be altered, shall be changed until dis Robert E. Lee filed as part of the original tions pertaining thereto (18 CFR Ch. I), position of these proceedings or expira document; Chairman Hyde dissenting; Com and the Commission’s rules of practice tion of the suspension period. missioner Wadsworth absent. and procedure, public hearings shall be (D ) Notices of intervention or peti [P.R. Doc. 69-4248; Piled, Apr. 10, 1969; held concerning the lawfulness of the 8:46 a.m.] proposed changes. tions to intervene may be filed with the (B ) Pending hearings and decisions Federal Power Commission, Washing thereon, the rate supplements herein are ton, D.C. 20426, in accordance with the FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION suspended and their use deferred until rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 and 1.37(f)) on or before May 21, [Docket No. RI69-668 etc.] date shown in the “Date Suspended Until” column, and thereafter until 1969. DAVID JACKMAN, JR., ET AL. made effective as prescribed by the By the Commission. Order Providing for Hearing on and Natural Gas Act; Provided, however, [ s e a l ] G o r d o n M . G rant, Suspension of Proposed Changes That the supplements to the rate sched Secretary. in Rates, and Allowing Rate ules filed. by Respondents, as set forth Changes To Become Effective Sub herein, shall become effective subject to 2 If an acceptable general undertaking, as ject to Refund 1 refund on the date and in the manner provided in Order No. 377, has previously been filed by a producer, then it w ill not be A p r il 3, 1969. herein prescribed if within 20 days from necessary for that producer to file an agree The Respondents named herein have the date of the issuance of this order ment and undertaking as p rovid ed herein. filed proposed changes in rates and Respondents shall each execute and file In such circumstances the pro d u cer’s pro posed increased rate will become effective as 1Does not consolidate for hearing or dis under its above-designated docket num of the expiration of the suspension period pose of the several matters herein. ber with the Secretary of the Commis without any further action by the producer. A p p e n d i x A Effec- Cents per Mcf Rate in Rate Sup Amount Date tive Date • • effect sub- Docket Respondent sched ple Purchaser and producing area of filing date sus- Proposed ject to re No. ule ment annual tendered unless pended Rate in increased fund in No. No. increase sus- until— effect rate dockets pended Nos. RI69-668-.. David Jackman, Jr. et al., 655 *1 3 Northern Natural Gas Co. (Belpre $482 3-12-69 4 4-12-69 8 4-13-69 813.5 • i « 14.5 Fourth National Bank Bldg., Field, Edwards County, Kans.). Wichita, Kans. 67202. RI69-699-.. W. B. Osborn, Jr. (Operator) 8 23 4 Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. 547 3-13-69 •4-13-69 »4-14-69 «12.5 » t 813.5 et al., Post Office Box 6767,. (Bradshaw Field, Hamilton San Antonio, Tex. 78209. County, Kans.). * Basic contract dated after Sept. 28, 1960, the date of issuance of general policy 8 Periodic rate increase. statement No. 61-1 and proposed rate does not exceed the 16 cents per Mcf area i Pressure base is 14.65 p.s.i.a. initial rate ceiling. 8 Subject to a downward B.t.u. adjustment. . 4 The stated effective date is the effective date requested by Respondent. 8 The stated effective date is the first day after expiration of the statutory notice. 8 The suspension period is limited to 1 day. The contracts related to the rate filings [Docket No. RI69-660 etc.] The proposed changed rates and proposed by David Jackman, Jr., et al. (Jack- SUPERIOR OIL CO. ET AL. charges may be unjust, unreasonable, man), and W. B. Osborn, Jr. (Operator), u ndu ly discriminatory, or preferential, et al. (O sborn), were executed subsequent to September 28, 1960, the date of issuance of Order Providing for Hearings on and or otherwise unlawful. the Commission’s statement of general Suspension of Proposed Changes The Commission finds: It is in the p u b policy No. 61-1, as amended, and the pro in Rates 1 lic interest and consistent with ttie posed increased rates are above the appli Natural Gas Act that the Commission A p r il 3, 1969. cable ceilings for increased rates but below enter upon hearings regarding t h e law the initial service ceilings for the areas in The Respondents named herein have fulness of the proposed changes, and tnaj volved. We believe, in this situation, Jack filed proposed increased rates and the supplements herein be s u s p e n d e d man’s and Osborn’s proposed rate filings charges of currently effective rate sched and their use be deferred as o r d e r e d should be suspended for 1 day from April ules for sales of natural gas under Com below. 12, 1969 (Jackm an), the proposed effective mission jurisdiction, as set forth in Ap The Commission orders: date, and April 13, 1969 (Osborn), the ex pendix A hereof. (A ) Under the Natural Gas Act, par piration date of the statutory notice. ticularly sections 4 and 15, the regula [F.R. Doc. 69-4204; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 1 Does not consolidate for hearing or dis tions pertaining thereto (18 CFR Cn. 8:45 a.m .] pose of the several matters herein. and the Commission’s rules of practic FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 NOTICES 6405 and procedure, public hearings shall be effective as prescribed by the Natural (D ) Notices of intervention or peti held concerning the lawfulness of the Gas Act. tions to intervene may be filed with the Federal Power Commission, Washington, proposed changes. (C) Until otherwise ordered by theD.C. 20426, in accordance with the rules (B) Pending hearings and decisions Commission, neither the suspended sup of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 thereon, the rate supplements herein are plements, nor the rate schedules sought and 1.37(f)) on or before May 21, 1969. suspended and their use deferred until to be altered, shall be changed until dis By the Commission. date shown in the “Date Suspended position of these proceedings or expira [seal] Gordon M. Grant, Until” column, and thereafter until made tion of the suspension period. Secretary. A ppendix A Effective Cents per Mcf Rate in Rate Sup Amount Date date Date effect Docket Respondent sched ple Purchaser and producing àrea of filing unless sus Rate in . Proposed subject to No. ule ment annual ten sus pended effect increased refund in No. No. increase dered pended until— rate dockets Nos. RI69-660-. The Superior Oil Co., 94 2 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Jicarilla $i 3- 7-69 34- 7-69 9- 7-69 3 14.0536 a * 14.0578 RI64-547. Post Office Box 1521, Field, Rio Arriba County, N. Houston, Tex. 77001, Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). Attention: H. W. Varner, Esq. The Superior Oil Co., 20 15 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Jicarilla 1,099 3- 7-69 2 4- 7-69 9- 7-69 12.0495 * 3 13.0536 9Q9 R.C.A. Bldg., Lease, Rio Arriba County, N. Washington, D.C. Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). 20006, Attention: Frank P. Saponaro, Jr., Esq. RI69-661— Continental Oil Co., 252 8 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Spra- 115 3-10-69 3 4-10-69 9-10-69 14.60 3 8 18.243 Post Office Box 2197, berry Field, Upton and Reagan Houston, Tex. 77001, Counties, Tex.) (R R . District Attention: R. E. Gal No. 7-C) (Permian Basin Area). braith, Manager, Natural Gas Division. ----- do...... 261 6 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (South 853 3-10-69 3 4-10-69 9-10-69 12.81 « 8 15.2025 Andrews Field, Andrews County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 8) (Per mian Basin Area)...... do...... 276 7 E l Paso Natural Gas Co. (Jalmat 5 3-10-69 3 4-10-69 9-10-69 13.34 « 81» 16.8793 Field, Lea County, N. Mex.) (Permian Basin Area)...... do...... 305 7 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (South 19 3-10-69 3 4-10-69 9-10-69 12.81 « 8 15.2025 Andrews Field, Andrews County, Tex.) (R R . District No. 8) (Per mian Basin Area)...... do...... 311 7 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Spra- 39 3-10-69 34-10-69 9-10-69 14.50 8 8 18.243 berry Field, Glasscock County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 8) (Per mian Basin Area)...... do___...... 312 9 .____do______! ______12 3-10-69 34-10-69 9-10-69 14.50 8 8 18.243 ...... d o ...... 308 3 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Amer 4,076 3-10-69 34-10-69 9-10-69 16.659 8 811 17.646 ica (Indian Basin Field, Eddy County, N. Mex.) (Permian ' Basin Area)...... do______333 2 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Red Hills 524 3-10-69 . 3 4-10-69 9-10-69 17.69 *811 18.48 Area, Lea County, N . Mex.) (Permian Basin Area). RI69-662.. Soldo Petroleum Co. 73 8 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Spra- 4,492 8-12-69 34-12-69 9-12-69 14.50 8 8 18.243 (Operator) et al., 970 berry Field, Upton County, First National Annex, Tex.) (R R . District No. 7-C) Oklahoma City, (Permian Basin Area). Okla. 73102, Atten tion: Gas-Gasoline ___ Division. K169-663__ Sohio Petroleum Co____ 74 11 .____do...... 225 3-12-69 34-12-69 9-12-69 14.50 » 8 18.243 RI69-664.. Shell Oil Co., 50 West 34 15 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Langmat 3,419 3-13-69 3 4-13-69 9-13-69 13.98 «812 16.1718 50th St., New York, Field, Lea County, N . Mex.) N .Y . 10020, Atten (Permian Basin Area). tion: F. C. Sweat, Manager, Natural Gas Sales. -— do...... 40 10 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Tubb- 1,648 3-13-69 3 4-13-69 9-13-69 14.99 « « 16.6318 Blinebry Field, Lea County, N. Mex.) (Permian Basin Area). RI69-665.. Hildalgo Gas Produc 3 3 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (San Juan 917 3- 7-69 24- 7-69 9- 7-69 10 «113.2486 * » 10 13 14.2678 tion Corp., 1401 Elm Field, San Juan County, N. Mex.) St., Dallas, Tex. (San Juan Basin Area). 75202, Attention: Donald K. Young, R169-666__ Forest Oil Corp., et al., 18 7 Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., M 90,000 3-10-69 »5-10-69 10-10-69 1« 19.5 6 9 15 22. 0 RI64-712. 1300 National Bank of (Laverne Field, Harper County, Commerce Bldg., San Okla.) (Panhandle Area). Antonio, Tex. 78205. 21 7 .____do______3-10-69 »5-10-69 10-10-69 1« 19.5 6 815 22.0 RI64-71*. Rf69-667-. Sun Oil Co.—D X Divi 184 7 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., '1,170 3-Ì2-69 is 6- 1-69 11- 1-69 16.0 8817.0 RI68-424. sion, 907 South De (South Hopewell Field, Pratt troit Ave., Tulsa, County, Kans.). Okla. 74120. 3 effective date is the first day after expiration of the statutory notice. 10 Includes partial reimbursement for the full 2.55 percent New Mexico Emergency 1 cent Tnir!5™ate increase- Change reflects an increase from a rate inclusive of the School Tax. i i ^ ^ araritee ior a rate exclusive of the 1 cent minimum 11 Includes upward price adjustment for B.t.u. content above 1,000 B.t.u.’s per cubic foot. « l®-025 P-s.i.a. 13 Base rate of 16.5 cents less quality deductions and 0.4467 cent contract compression « P e r S 1 “ kumum guarantee for liquids. charge. i rate increase. 13 Contract includes 1 cent per Mcf minimum guarantee for liquids not filed for. ‘ InoreJrer d,ate 18 the effective date requested by Respondent. “ Amount based on combined total field volumes from properties covered by 8 Prt^n^ fPPffcable area ceiling rate to contract rate, Forest’s Rate Schedules Nos. 18 and 21: pressure base is 14.66 p.s.i.a. ** Subject to upward and downward B.t.u. adjustment: M The stated effective date is the contractual effective date for proposed rate. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6406 NOTICES The Superior Oil Co. (Superior) requests at the National Arboretum, Washington, and Exchange Commission, Washington that its proposed rate increases be permitted D.C. 25, D.C., not later than the date specified. to become effective on March 15, 1969. Hi If no one requests a hearing, this appli dalgo Gas Production Corp. requests a retro 2. Effective date. This regulation is ef active effective date of January 1, 1969, for fective immediately. cation will be determined by order of the its proposed rate increase. Sim Oil Co.— D X 3. Delegation, a. Pursuant to the au Commission on the basis of the facts Division requests an effective date of May 31, thority vested in me by the Federal stated therein and other information 1969 for its rate filing. Good cause has not Property and Administrative Services contained in the official files of the Com been .shown for waiving the 30-day notice mission pertaining thereto. requirement provided in section 4(d) of the Act of 1949 (63 Stat. 377), as amended, Natural Gas Act to permit earlier effective and the Act of June 1,1948 (62 Stat. 281), For the Commission (pursuant to dele dates for the aforementioned producers’ rate as amended, authority is hereby dele gated authority). filings and such requests are denied. gated to the Secretary of Agriculture to Supplement No. 7 to Continental Oil Co.’s appoint uniformed guards as special [ s e a l ] O rval L. DtrBois, (Continental PPC Gas Rate Schedule No. policemen and to make all the needful Secretary. 276, and the proposed rate increase filed by rules and regulations for the protection [F.R. Doc. 69-4238; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Hidalgo Gas Production Corp. (Hidalgo) re of the buildings and grounds of the 8:46 a.m.] flect partial reimbursement for the full 2.55 percent New Mexico Emergency School Tax. Arboretum, Washington, D.C., over The buyer, El Paso Natural Gas Co. (El which the Federal Government has ex [File Nos. 7-3065, 7-3066] Paso), in accordance with its policy of pro clusive criminal jurisdiction. testing tax filings proposing reimbursement b. The Secretary of Agriculture may COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP. AND for the New Mexico Emergency School Tax redelegate this authority to any officer BUTTES GAS & OIL CO. in excess of 0.55 percent, is expected to file or employee of the Department of a protest to these rate increases. El Paso Agriculture. Notice of Applications for Unlisted questions the right of the producer under Trading Privileges and of Oppor the tax reimbursement clause to file a rate c. This authority shall be exercised in increase reflecting tax reimbursement com accordance with the limitations and re tunity for Hearing puted on the basis of an increase in tax rate quirements of the above-cited acts, and A p r il 7, 1969. by the New Mexico Legislature in excess of policies, procedures, and controls pre 0.55 percent. While El Paso concedes that the scribed by the General Services In the matter of applications of New Mexico Legislature effected a higher rate Administration. the Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington of at least 0.55 percent, they claim there is Stock Exchange for unlisted trading controversy as to whether or not the new Dated: April 4,1969. privileges in certain securities. legislation effected an increased rate in ex cess of 0.55 percent. In view of the con R obert L . K u n z ig , The above-named national securities tractual problem presented, we shall provide Administrator of General Services. exchange has filed applications with the that the hearings herein with respect to the [F.R. Doc. 69-4237; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Securities and Exchange Commission rate filings containing such tax shall con 8:45 a.m.] pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B ) of the cern themselves with the contractual basis Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for the rate filings, as well as the statutory Rule 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted lawfulness of the proposed increased rates trading privileges in the common stocks and charges. of the following companies, which The basic contracts related to the proposed SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE rate increases filed by Superior (Supplement securities are listed and registered on No. 2 to Superior’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule one or more other national securities No. 94) and Hidalgo contain a 1 cent per COMMISSION exchanges: Mcf minimum guarantee for liquids provision [File No. 7-3067] F ile No. but this 1 cent has been excluded from the Computer Sciences Corp______7-3065 proposed rate. Superior and Hidalgo are ad CLOROX CO. Buttes Gas & Oil Co_____;__2______7-3066 vised that a notice of change in rate will be required if they intend to collect the 1 cent Notice of Application for Unlisted Upon receipt of a request, on or before per Mcf minimum guarantee for liquids in Trading Privileges and of Oppor April 22, 1969, from any interested per the future. See the Commission’s order is tunity for Hearing son, the Commission will determine sued December 7, 1967, in Docket No. RI64- whether the application with respect to 491 et al., Union Texas Petroleum, a division A p r il 7, 1969. any of the companies named shall be set of Allied Chemical Corp. (Operator), et al. In the matter of application of the down for hearing. Any such request All otf the producers’ proposed increased Midwest Stock Exchange for unlisted should state briefly the title of the secu rates and charges exceed the applicable area rity in which he is interested, the nature price levels for increased rates as set forth trading privileges in a certain security; in the Commission’s statement of general The above-named national securities of the interest of the person making the policy No. 61-1, as amended (18 CFR 2.56), exchange has filed an application with request, and the position he proposes to with the exception of thé rate increases fileid the Securities and Exchange Commission take at the hearing, if ordered. In addi by the producers in the Permian Basin Area pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B ) of the tion, any interested person may submit which exceed the just and reasonable rates Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and his views or any additional facts bearing established by the Commission in Opinion Rule 12f—1 thereunder, for unlisted on any of the said applications by means No. 468, as amended, and should be sus of a letter addressed to the Secretary, pended for 5 months as ordered herein. trading privileges in the common stock of the following company, which security Securities and Exchange Commission, [F.R. Doc. 69—4205; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Washington 25, D.C., not later than the 8:45 a.m.] is listed and registered on one or more other national securities exchange: date specified. If no one requests a hear ing with respect to any particular appli Clorox Co., File No. 7-3067. cation, such application will be deter GENERAL SERVICES Upon receipt of a request, on or before mined by order of the Commission on the April 22, 1969, from any interested per basis of the facts stated therein and son, the Commission will determine other information contained in the offi ADMINISTRATION whether the application shall be set down cial files of the Commission pertaining [Federal Property Management Regs. for hearing. Any such request should Temporary Reg. D-15] state briefly the nature of the interest thereto. of the person making the request and SECRETARY Of AGRICULTURE For the Commission (pursuant to the position he proposes to take at the delegated authority). Delegation of Authority hearing, if ordered. In addition, any in terested person may submit his views [ s e a l ] _ O rval L . D u B o is , 1. Purpose. This regulation delegates or any additional facts bearing on the Secretary. authority to the Secretary of Agriculture said application by means of a letter [F.R. Doc. 69-4239; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; to assist in controlling violations of law addressed to the Secretary, Securities 8:46 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11 1969 NOTICES 6407 [70-4739] may grant exemption from such rules as FSA No. 41609— Brick and related ar GEORGIA POWER CO. provided in Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof ticles from and to Rock House, Tex. Filed or take such other action as it may deem by Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent Notice of Proposed Issue of First appropriate. Persons who request a hear (No. B-23), for interested rail carriers. Mortgage Bonds for Sinking Fund ing or advice as to whether a hearing is Rates on brick and related articles, as de Purposes ordered will receive notice of further scribed in the application, in carloads, developments in this matter, including from and to points in Rock House, Tex., A pril 7, 1969. the date of the hearing (if ordered) and on the one hand, to and from points in Notice is hereby given that Georgia any postponements thereof. southwestern territory, on the other. Power Co. (“Georgia”), 270 Peachtree Grounds for relief— Short-line dis For the Commission (pursuant to dele Street, Atlanta, Ga. 30303, a public- tance formula and grouping. gated authority). utility subsidiary company of The South Tariff— Supplement 62 to Southwest ern Co., a registered holding company, [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, ern Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC has filed a declaration with this Com Secretary. 4698. mission, pursuant to the Public Utility [F.R. Doc. 69-4240; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; FSA No. 41610— Cotton from and to Holding Company Act of 1935 (“Act”), 8:46 a.m.] points in Texas. Filed by Texas-Louisiana designating sections 6(a) and 7 thereof Freight Bureau, agent (No. 625), for in as applicable to the proposed transac terested rail carriers. Rates on cotton, tion. All interested persons are referred in carloads, as described in the applica to the declaration, which is summarized INTERSTATE COMMERCE tion, from specified CRI&P R R Co. ori below, fbr a complete statement of the gins in Texas, to Corpus Christi, for proposed transaction. COMMISSION export, also, to Galveston, Houston, and Georgia proposes, on or prior to June 1, Texas City, Tex., for interstate and ex 1969, to issue $5,684,000 principal amount FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS port traffic. of its first mortgage bonds, 4% percent FOR RELIEF series due 1995, under the provisions of Grounds for relief— Rail-carrier com its indenture dated as of March 1, 1941, A pril 8 , 1969. petition. between Georgia and Chemical Bank, as Protests to the granting of an applica Tariff— Supplement 71 to Texas-Lou trustee, as amended and supplemented, tion must be prepared in accordance with isiana Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC and to surrender such bonds to the trust Rule 1100.40 of the general rules of prac 1020. ee in accordance with the sinking fund tice (49 CFR 1100.40) and filed within F'SA No. 41611— Grain and grain prod provisions. The bonds are to be identical 15 days from the date of publication of ucts from and to points in Arkansas. F’iled with those authorized by the Commission this notice in the F ederal R eg ist e r . by Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent on August 18, 1965 (Holding Company (No. B-29), for interested rail carriers. L o n g - a n d -S h o r t H a u l Act Release No. 15294), and are to be Rates on grain, grain products, and re issued on the basis of property additions, FSA No. 41606— Clay, kaolin or pyro- lated articles, also seeds, in carloads, as thus making available for construction phyllite from points in southern territory. described in the application, between and other purposes cash which would Filed by O. W. South, Jr., agent (No. Malloy, Newell, and Pearson, Ark., on the otherwise be required to satisfy the sink A6088), for interested rail carriers. Rates one hand, and points in Arkansas, Lou ing fund requirement or to purchase on clay, kaolin or pyrophyllite, processed isiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, also Nat bonds for such purpose. clay, and clay and water mixed, in car chez and Vicksburg, Miss., and State The fees and expenses to be paid by loads, as described. in the application, Line, Okla.-Kans., on the other. Georgia in connection with the issuance from points in Florida and Georgia, and Grounds for relief— Market competi of the bonds are estimated at $2,500, Langley, S.C., and related points, also tion. including $1,500 for charges of the trust Glendon and Robbins, N.C., to Casper, Tariffs— Supplements 137 and 1 to ee and counsel fee of $500. It is stated Wyo. Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent, tar that the issuance of the sinking fund Grounds for relief— Rate relationship. iffs ICC 4495 and 4841, respectively. bonds has been authorized by the Tariff—Supplement 46 to Southern Georgia Public Service Commission, and Freight Association, agent, tariff ICC By the Commission. that no other State commission and no S-751. [ seal] -H. N eil G arson, Federal commission, other than this FSA No. 41607— Calcium chloride to Secretary. Commission, has jurisdiction over the New Orleans, La. Filed by Traffic Execu proposed transaction. tive Association-Eastern Railroads, agent [F.R. Doc. 69-4252; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; 8:47 a.m.] Notice is further given that any inter (E.R. No. 2941), for interested rail car ested person may, not later than April 30, riers. Rates on calcium chloride, other 1969, request in writing that a hearing be than liquid, in bags, in box cars, as de [Notice 811] held on such matter, stating the nature scribed in the application, from specified MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY points in Michigan and New York, to New of his interest, the reasons for such re AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS quest, and the issues of fact or law raised Orleans, La. by said declaration which he desires to Grounds for relief— Market competi A pril 8, 1969. tion. controvert; or he may request that he be The following are notices of filing of notified if the Commission should order a Tariffs— Supplements 96 and 235 to applications for temporary authority hearing thereon. Any such request should Traffic Executive Association-Eastern under section 210a(a) of the Interstate oe addressed: Secretary, Securities and Railroads, agent, tariffs ICC C-438 and Commerce Act provided for under the exchange Commission, Washington, C-334, respectively. new rules of Ex Parte No. MC-67 (49 u.C. 20549. A copy of such request should FSA No. 41608— Rolled glass from Flo- CFR Part 340), published in the F ederal pe senred personally or by mail (airmail reffe, Pa. Filed by Traffic Executive Asso R egister, issue of April 27, 1965, effec i the person being served is located more ciation-Eastern Railroads, agent (E.R. tive July 1,1965. These rules provide that .a n 500 miles from the point of mail- No. 2942), for interested rail carriers. protests to the granting of an applica ,uP °n the declarant at the above- Rates on glass, rolled, not flashed, tion must be filed with the field official tated address, and proof of service (by framed, leaded, nor polished, nor sheet named in the F ederal R egister publica mdavit or, in case of an attorney at prism, not bent, in carloads, as described tion, within 15 calendar days after the *aw, by certificate) should be filed with in the application, from Floreffe, Pa., to date of notice of the filing of the appli ne request. At any time after said date, Miami and Miami Plantation, Fla. cation is published in the F ederal R eg ne declaration, as filed or as it may be Grounds for relief— Market competi ister. One copy of such protest must be 6« e^’ may ke permitted to become tion. served on the applicant, or its authorized Sa« i 88 Provided in Rule 23 of the Tariff— Supplement 235 to Traffic Ex representative, if any, and the protests L f eIal ru*e®- and regulations promul ecutive Association-Eastern Railroads, must certify that such service has been gated under the Act, or the Commission Agent, tariff ICC C-334. made. The protests must be specific as FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 6408 NOTICES to the service which such protestant can operate as a common carrier, by motor ing: Plastic pellets, powder or granules, and will offer, and must consist of a vehicle, over irregular routes, transport in bulk, from Roanoke, Va., to.Lynch- signed original and six copies. ing: Household goods, as defined by the burg, Va., restricted to shipments hav A copy of the application is on file, and Commission, between points in Alaska, ing had a prior movement by rail, for 180 can be examined at the Office of the on the one hand, and, on the other Seat days. Supporting shipper : Monsanto Co., Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com tle, Wash., using all ports of entry on 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. mission, Washington, D.C., and also in the Washington-Canada border and all Louis, Mo. 63166. Send protests to: Jack the field office to which protests are to ports of entry in the Puget Sound area, K. Huff, District Supervisor, Interstate be transmitted- for 180 days. Supporting shippers: New Commerce Commission, Bureau of York Life Insurance, c/o Sarah J. M c- Operations, 316 East Morehead, Suite M otor C arriers o p P r o p e r t y Curley, Anchorage, Alaska, Marathon 417, BSR Building, Charlotte, N.C. No. MC 26396 (Sub-No. 40 T A ), filed Oil Co., Attention: Jack R. McCormick, 28202. April 4, 1969. Applicant: POPELKA Anchorage, Alaska, Alaska Area Native No. MC 133581 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed TR U CK ING CO., Post Office Box 958, Health Service, Box 7-741, Anchorage, April 3, 1969. Applicant: HOLDT PO Livingston, Mont. 59047. Applicant’s Alaska 99501. Send protests to: E. J. TATO COMPANY, INC., Route 2, Red representative: J. F. Meglen, 2822 Third Casey, District Supervisor, Interstate Cloud, Nebr. 68970. Applicant’s repre Avenue North, Post Office Box 1581, Commerce Commission, Bureau of Op sentative: Frederick. J. Coffman, Post Billings, Mont. 59103. Authority sought erations, 6130 Arcade Building, Seattle, Office Box 806, Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. Au to operate as a common carrier, by motor Wash. 98101. ^ thority sought to operate as a contract vehicle, over irregular routes, transport No. MC 118491 (Sub-No. 3 T A ), filed carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ing: Lumber and lumber products, from March 28, 1969. Applicant: ALASKA routes, transporting: Dairy products, and points in Park County, Mont., to points TERMINALS, INC., Post Office Box materials, and supplies used in the manu-. in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Nebraska, 88728, Tukwila Station (5053 East Mar f acture and production of dairy products, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Burk- ginal W ay South, Seattle, Wash. 98134), between Red Cloud, Nebr., on the one land Studs, Inc., Post Office Box 498, Seattle, Wash. 98168. Applicant’s repre hand, and, on the other, points in Livingston, Mont. 59047. Send protests sentative: Hugh B. Mitchell (same ad Arizona, California, and Missouri, for to: Paul J. Labane, District Supervisor, dress as above). Authority sought to op 180 days. Supporting shipper: Don Interstate Commerce Commission, Bu erate as a common carrier, by motor Pauly Cheese, Inc., Manitowoc, Wis. reau of Operations, 251 U.S. Post Office vehicle, over irregular routes, transport Send protests to: District Supervisor Building, Billings, Mont. 59101. ing: Household goods, as defined by the Johnston, Interstate Commerce Commis No. MC 92633 (Sub-No. 13 T A ), filed Commission between points in Alaska, sion, Bureau of Operations, 315 Post Of April 4, 1969. Applicant: ZIRBEL on the one hand, and, on the other, fice Building, Lincoln, Nebr. 68508. TRANSPORT, INC., 420 28th Street Seattle, Wash., using all ports of entry on No. MC 133596 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed North, Lewiston, Idaho 83501. Applicant’s the Washington-Canada border and all April 1, 1969. Applicant: LAWRENCE M. representative: Donald A. Ericson, Suite ports of entry in the Puget Sound Area, FAIRAJLL, doing business as WHITEY’s 708, Old National Bank Building, Spo for 180 days. Supporting shippers: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE, 215 Ohio kane, Wash. 99201. Authority sought to Marathon Oil Co., Attention: Jack R.. Avenue, Fremont, Ohio 43420. Applicant’s operate as a common carrier, by motor McCormick, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, representative: Paul F. Beery, 88 East vehicle, over irregular routes, transport New York Life Insurance, c/o Sarah J. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Au ing: Clay, from Bovill, Latah County, McCurley, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, and thority sought to operate as a common Idaho, to Toledo, Lincoln County, Oreg., Alaska Area Native Health Service, At carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular for 180 days. Supporting shipper: J. R. tention: Charles C. Culp, Chief, Area routes, transporting: (1) Wrecked, dis Simplot Co., Bovill, Idaho 83806. Send General Services Branch, Box 7-741, abled and repossessed motor vehicles, protests to: L. C. Taylor, District Super Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Send protests trailers and busses (except trailers de visor, Bureau of Operations, Interstate to: E. J. Casey, District Supervisor, In signed to be drawn by passenger auto Commerce Commission, 401 U.S. Post terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau mobiles) ; and (2) replacement vehicles Office, Spokane, Wash. 99201. of Operations, 6130 Arcade Building, for wrecked or disabled motor vehicles No. MC 111729 (Sub-No. 280 T A ), filed Seattle, Wash. 98101. and trailers, between points on that por April 3, 1969. Applicant: AMERICAN No. MC 119099 (Sub-No. 8 T A ), filed tion of the Ohio Turnpike (U.S. Inter COURIER CORPORATION, 2 Nevada April 4, 1969. Applicant: BJORKLUD state Highway 80) beginning at the ha- Drive (N. H. P -P O ), Lake Success, N.Y. TRUCKING, INC., First Avenue NE. and diana-Ohlo State line and continuing 11040. Applicant’s representative: Ge Eighth Street, Buffalo, Minn. 55313. Ap east on the Ohio Turnpike to Exit 10, rard L. Peace (same address as above). plicant’s representative: Val M. Higgins, and, also, Whitey’s Automotive Service Authority sought to operate as a com 1000 First National Bank Building, Centers at or near Fremont, Toledo, and mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir Minneapolis, Minn. 55402. Authority Exits 4 and 5 of the Ohio Turnpike, on regular routes, transporting: Business sought to operate as a common carrier, the one hand, and, on the other, points papers, records, and audit and account by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, In Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and, ing media of all kinds and advertising transporting: Plastic burial vault liners, Pennsylvania, for 180 days. Supporting material moving therewith, between from Roseville, Minn., to points in the shippers: Ohio Turnpike Commission, Raleigh, N.C., on the one hand, and, on United States west of the States of North Columbus, Ohio; Amoco Truck Service, the other, points in South Carolina, for Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kan Route 120 and Libby Road, Stoney Ridge. 180 days. Supporting shipper: Carolina sas, Oklahoma, and Texas (but not in Ohio; Fremont White Truck Sales « Power and Light Co., Raleigh, N.C. cluding said States), for 180 days. Sup Service, Route No. 20 East, Fremont, 27602. Send protests to: Anthony porting shipper: Wilbert, Inc., Box 147, Ohio; Toledo 5 Pure Truck Stop, Exit £>, Chiusano, District Supervisory Bureau of Forest Park, 111. 60130. Send protests to: Ohio Turnpike and Detroit Expressway, Operations, Interstate Commerce Com A. N. Spath, District Supervisor, Inter Box 7523, Oregon Branch, Toledo, Ohio mission, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y. state Commerce Commission, Bureau of 43616. Send protests to: Keith D. Warner, 10007. Operations, 448 Federal Building and District Supervisor, Bureau of Opera No. MC 118490 (Sub-No. 3 T A ), filed U.S. Courthouse, 110 South Fourth tions, 5234 Federal Office Building, a* Mar. 28, 1969. Applicant: ALASKA VAN Street, Minneapolis, Minn. 55401. Summit Street, Toledo, Ohio 43604. & STORAGE CO., INC., Post Office Box No. MC 123067 (Sub-No. 78 T A ), filed By the Commission. 88728, Tukwila Station, 5053 East M ar April 3, 1969. Applicant: M & M TAN K [ s e a l ] H. N e il G arson, ginal W ay South, Seattle, Wash. 98134, LINES, INC., Post Office Box 612, Win- Secretary* Seattle, Wash. 98168. Applicant’s repre ston-Salem, N.C. 27102. Authority sought sentative: Hugh B. Mitchell (same ad to operate as a common carrier, by motor [F.R. Doc. 69-4253; Filed, Apr. 10. 19691 8:47 am.] dress as above). Authority sought to vehicle* over irregular routes, transport FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969 NOTICES 6409 [Notice 323] approved the transfer to Foltz Truck West Wisconsin Avenue, Neenah, Wis. MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER Line, Inc., Princeton, Kans., of the oper 54956, practitioner for applicants. ating rights in certificate Nos. MC-63959 PROCEEDINGS [ seal] H. N e il G arson, and MC-63959 (Sub-No. 5) issued Secretary. A pril 8,1969. April 6, 1949, and February 19, 1959, re spectively, to Louis Foltz, Princeton, [F.R. Doc. 69-4254; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; Synopses of orders entered pursuant 8:47 a.m.] to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com Kans., authorizing the transportation of merce Act, and rules and regulations tires, petroleum products, in containers, prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part batteries, automobile accessories, black [Notice 323 A] 1132), appear below : smith coal, wagon parts, iron and steel MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER articles, hardware, agricultural imple As provided in the Commission’s spe PROCEEDINGS cial rules of practice any interested per ments, twine, and numerous other com son may file a petition seeking reconsid modities of a general commodity nature, A pril 8, 1969. eration of the following numbered pro over a regular route from Kansas City, Synopses of orders entered pursuant ceedings within 20 days from the* date Mo., to Princeton, Kans.; numerous other to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com of publication of this notice. Pursuant commodities of a general commodity na merce Act, and rules and regulations pre to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com ture over regular routes from Kansas scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 1132), merce Act, the filing of such a petition City, Mo., to Ottawa and Wellsville, appear below: will postpone the effective date of the Kans., and general commodities, with the As provided in the Commission’s gen order in that proceeding pending its dis usual exceptions, from points in the Kan eral rules of practice any interested per position. The matters relied upon by pe sas City, Mo.-Kansas City, Kans., com son may file a petition seeking reconsid titioners must be specified in their peti mercial zone, as defined by the Commis eration of the following numbered tions with particularity. sion, St. Joseph, Mo., and the site of the proceedings within 30 days from the date Cooperative Refinery at Horn, Mo., to No. MC-FC-71203. By order of of service of the order. Pursuant to sec Ottawa, Kans. Clyde N. Christey, 641 March 26, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board tion 17(8) of the Interstate Commerce Harrison Street, Topeka, Kans. 66603, approved the transfer to Ben H. Schus Act, the filing of such a petition will post attorney for applicants. ter, doing business as Ben H. Schuster pone the effective date of the order in No. MC-FC-71225. By order of April Trucking, Menomonee Falls, Wis., of the that proceeding pending its disposition. 19, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board ap operating rights in permit No. MC-17702 The matters relied upon by petitioners proved the transfer to Richard M. issued November 17, 1966? to Ben H. must be specific in their petitions with Sweeney and Martin G. Sweeney, a part Schuster and Adolph Konrath, a partner particularity. nership, doing business as Sweeney ship, doing business as Schuster & Kon No. MC-FC-70532. By order of Bros. Transportation, Chicopee, Mass., rath, Menomonee Falls, Wis., authoriz March 28, 1969, Division 3, acting as an of certificate of registration No. M C - ing the transportation of processed milk, Appellate Division, approved the trans 120023 (Sub-No. 1) issued January 22, fer to Ann Arbor Warehouse Co., a cor empty milk containers, concentrated 1964, in the name of Emile Singelais, orange juice, and dairy machinery and poration, doing business as Elsifor Mov doing business as Neil Transportation, ing & Storage Co., Ann Arbor, Mich., of parts thereof, over regular routes between Pinehurst Billerica, Mass., authorizing Germantown, Wis., and Chicago, HI., the operating rights in certificate No. the transportation of general commod MC-10029, issued December 10, 1958, to serving the intermediate points in M il ities between points in Massachusetts. waukee, Wis. William C. Dineen, 710 Elsifor Moving & Storage Co., Inc., Joseph A. Kline, 185 Denoushire Street, Columbus, Ohio, authorizing the trans North Plankinton Avenue, Milwaukee, Boston, Mass. 02110, and David M. M ar Wis. 53203, attorney for applicants. portation o f: Household goods as defined shall, Esq., 135 State Street, Suite 200, by the Commission, between Ann Arbor, No. MC-FC-71208. By order of Springfield, Mass. 01103, attorneys for Mich., and points in Michigan within 70 March 26, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board applicants. miles thereof, on the one hand, and, on approved the transfer to Samuel L. No. MC-FC-71229. By order of March the other, points in Illinois, Indiana, Peone, doing business as Spokane Ford 26, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board ap Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsyl Motor Freight, 3927 Bast Grace, Spokane, proved the transfer to Woodland Trans vania, Wisconsin, the District of Colum Wash. 99201, of the certificate No. M C - port, Inc., Siren, Wis., of certificate No. bia, and those in Maryland and Virginia 89408 issued May 24, 1954, to John W . MC-123497 issued June 6,1962, to Gerald within 50 miles of Washington, D.C. and Paul Samuels, 1327 North Cannon S. Anderson and M. Irving Anderson, do Ramon S. Regan, 2255 Penobscot Build Street, Spokane, Wash. 99201, authoriz- ing business as Anderson Bros., Siren, ing, Detroit, Mich. 48226, attorney for mg the transportation of : General com Wis., authorizing the transportation of: applicants. modities, with the usual exceptions, be- Wooden poles, posts, and lumber, from w 6? Spokane, Wash., and Germania, points in Burnett County, Wis., to points [ seal], H. N eil G arson, Wash., serving all intermediate points. in Indiana, Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, Secretary. No. MC-FC-71217. By order of Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, [F.R. Doc. 69-4255; Filed, Apr. 10, 1969; March 26,1969, the Motor Carrier Board and South Dakota. John J. Keller, 145 8:47 a.m.] CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— APRIL The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published tc date during April 3 CFR Page Page 7 CFR Pase 7 CFR— Continued Executive Orders : 51______6180 912 ______6181 JJ248 (amended by EO 11463) _ 6029 220______6321 913 ______6182 11368 (amended by EO 11464) _ 6233 718 ------6235 966 ______6326 11462_____ *Qnq 813______6321 980 6326 814______6031 1133 6182 11464------coqq 849______6237 1468 6328 905 ______6277 1472______6327 s CFR 906 ______6075 1601______6328 ois 907 ------__ 6034, 6325 P roposed R ules: 908 ______6035, 6325, 6326 28______6244 910______:______6181 81______6283 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 69— FRIDAY, APRIL 11 1969 6410 FEDERAL REGISTER Page 7 CFR—Continued Page 15 CFR—-Continued Page 3 6 CFR P roposed R ules—Continued 373______„ 6092 7______— — — 6331 379______:______6094 362______6106, 6194 P roposed R ules: 385____ — ______6096 980______6396 7______6283 1103— ______- 5998 P roposed R u l e s : 1138______6001 1000______- ____ 6246, 6254 3 9 CFR 8 CFR 16 CFR 20 1______- - - ^ ___ _ 6101 214______6036 13______6039, 6040, 6097-6100, 6393 542______. _____ 6190 238______6036 822 ______5989 316a— ______, ______6036 17 CFR 832______6101 9 CFR 240______6101 P roposed R ules: 132______5998 P roposed R ules: 19 CFR 76______6047 1 ______6375 41 CFR 317______6284 16______5986 10 CFR 5 - 1 ______6192 21 CFR 5 -2 ______6192 2______6037 5-3 ______6192 50______6037 2 ______6237 5-53— ______— 1 _____ 5990 73______— 6277 120 ______6041, 6239 1 2 -3 ______6242 115______6037 121 ______6043, 6239, 6240 12-7______6243 P roposed R ules: 138______-______6043 12-15 ______6243 1 ______6002 145 ______- 6044 101-19______6192 2______6002 146 ______6237 50______6002 147 ______6241 4 2 CFR 115______6002 148v______— ______6044 81______6394 281______5987 P roposed R ules: 12 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 73____ — ______... 6047 204______6329 8______6396 76______6122 563______6279 121— ______6194, 6284 650______6329 141c______6284 4 3 CFR 654— _____ :______6329 146c_____ 6284 P roposed R ules: 146d______6284 P ublic L and O rders: 217______6200 146e______6284 4582 (modified by PLO 4589) — 6331 . 6331 226______6295 4589— ______329______— 6198 24 CFR 526______- _ 6199200______- ______6183 4 5 CFR 569______1_____ 6200 242______6183 4 0 ______5990 121______„ 6281 14 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 1907—____:______6245 39______6330, 6375, 6376 4 6 CFR 71______- 5895, 5896 26 CFR 255______5991 6038, 6075-6079, 6173, 6280, 6331, 309______„ 5991 6376 P roposed R u l e s : 73______5986, 6079, 6080 41______6244, 6333 75______6079 47 CFR 97______6174, 6377 29 CFR 73 _ 5996 208— ______- 6081 1504— , ______6150 P roposed R u l e s : 214______6087 P roposed R u l e s : 63 _ 6290 385______,______6091 _ 6293, 6397 1204— ______6393 850______6396 73_.______95 6293 P roposed R ules: 97______6294,6334 23______6195 31 CFR 29______6196 82______6393 49 CFR 39______6398 l ______6395 61______6112 32 CFR "I— ____ 6102 71______6001, 6122, 6197, 6288, 6289 371______198____ 5987 1033______’5997_. 6281,6395 73 6050 200______6375 75______6289 P roposed R u l e s : 536______6241 6290 91______6196 173____ — 121______6112, 6196, 6198, 6333 393______"I"—— 6001 32A CFR 6050 127 6196,6198 1048— — . 135______6195, 6198 NSA (Ch. XVIH): ” 6296 1307:______298______6256 IN S-1______6188 15 CFR 33 CFR 50 CFR 28______6103, 6282,6331 30______6i83 110— ______— 5988 372______6091 117______- _____ 5989,€280 3 3 ______;;_____ 6104, 6105, 6282, 6332