DOCSLIB.ORG

Henry Mountain Coal Field, Garfield County, Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Henry Mountain Coal Field, Garfield County, Utah Rehabilitation Potential for the Henry Mountain Coal Field BLM LIBRARY I 88018645 A" ^w^ U.S. Department of Interior • Bureau of Land Management • EMRIA Report No. 15 Prepared by Utah State University • 1978 - BLM UBRARY ENERGY MINERAL REHABILITATION INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS HENRY MOUNTAIN COAL FIELD Garfield County, Utah Prepared by Utah State University and Utah State University Foundation Logan, Utah 50777 -101 REPORT DOCUMENTATION 1. REPORT NO. 3. Recipient's Accession No. PAGE BLM/YA/TR-78/15 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Energy Mineral Rehabilitation Inventory and Analysis May 15, 1978 Henry Mountain Coal Field. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. Cyrus M. McKell and Associates of Institute for Land 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Rehabilitation 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Utah State University 11. Contract (C) or Grant(G) No. Logan, Utah 84322 (C y"A-512-CT6-258 (G) 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered Bureau of Land Management EMRIA Staff, Bldg. 50 Final Denver Federal Center 14. Lakewood, Colorado 80225 15. Supplementary Notes Geological Survey Coal Quality Report Soil Conservation S. Soil Survey of Henry Mountain Resource Area 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report notes and summarizes known baseline information relative to the coal deposits in the Henry Mountain Resource area in South Central Utah. Findings from chemical and biological analyses of eight geologic cores obtained from the overburden are correlated with field plantings on geologic outcrops and representa- tive soils identified by a soil conservation service soil survey. Potential for rehabilitation is discussed and recommended procedures are presented. 17. Document Analysis a. Descriptors 0510 Environmental Surveys 0807 Coal Deposits 1407 Reclamation b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms Arid lands rehabilitation potential Evaluation of rehabilitation potential in arid region Vegetation establishment recommendations c. COSATI Field/Group 18. Availability Statement 19. Security Class (This Report) Release unlimited and available through BLM, Utah State Office, Salt Lake City, 20. Security Class (This Page) Utah fi4im (See ANSI-Z39.18) See Instructions on Reverse OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-77) (Formerly NTIS-35) Department of Commerce FOREWORD This report was prepared by staff members of Utah State University working as consultants to Utah State University Foundation. The profes- sional team consisted of the following: Cyrus M, McKell, Plant Ecologist and Team Leader Jerry Fuhriman, Landscape Architect Gerald F, Gifford, Rangeland Hydro! ogist Steven G, Richardson, Plant Research Technician Alvin G, Southard, Soil Scientist Gordon Van Epps, Land Rehabilitation Specialist J. Stewart Williams, Geologist Gar Workman, Wildlife Specialist Administrative support was provided by: Kent Henderson, Manager, USU Foundation Paul Hul linger, Director, USU Foundation Additional review of the report were by: Don D. Dwyer, Range Scientist Roland Jeppson, Civil Engineer Wesley Maughan, Rural Sociologist Neil West, Plant Ecologist Glenn Wilde, Editor The purpose of this report was to assemble and summarize known base- line information relative to the Henry Mountain resource area and to present findings and recommendations from specific studies on suitability of geologic overburden and soils to support a rehabilitation program should the coal resource be developed. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS I . SUMMARY 1 A. Introduction 2 B, Local Information 3 C. CI imate 5 D. Geology 5 E. Coal 7 F. Soil 7 G. Vegetation 9 H. Hydrology 9 I. Wildlife 10 J. Visual 11 K. Present Land Use 11 L. Objectives of Reclamation 12 M. Recommendations for Reclamation 12 INTRODUCTION 16 A. Purpose 18 B. Objectives 18 C. Authority 19 D. Responsibility 19 E. Location 21 F. Historical Perspective 24 G, Socioeconomic Factors 27 H. Developments in the Region 29 I. Land Status 31 J. Mineral Status 33 PHYSICAL PROFILE 35 A. CI imate 36 B. Physiography 41 C. Topography 42 D. Geology 45 E. Coal 74 F. Soils 80 G. Vegetation 102 H. Sedimentation 108 I. Hydrology and Water Supply 128 J. Wildlife 138 K. Cultural 141 L. Archaeology 141 M. Visual Prominence 142 Ill IV. PRESENT LAND USE 153 A. Grazing 154 B. Recreation 161 C. Watershed 163 D. Wildlife 163 V. OBJECTIVES OF RECLAMATION 165 A. Legal Requirements 166 B. Management Framework Plan, BLM, Richfield District 170 C. Limitations and Potentials in the Objectives for Reclamation 170 VI. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REHABILITATION 172 A. Potential for Rehabilitation 173 B, Recommendations for Rehabilitation 176 VII. LITERATURE CITED 198 VIII. APPENDIX 204 A. Detailed descriptions of geologic cores for holes 15, 3, 4, 5, 2, 1, and 7, Listed in order of location from West to East on the study site. 205 B. Coal Quality Henry Mountains Field EMRIA Study Area by Joseph R. Hatch and Ronald H. Affolter U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado March 10, 1978. 218 C. Soil descriptions of units mapped by the Soil Conservation Service in their 1977 soil survey of the Henry Mountains coal resource area. Terms used in the following descriptions are defined in the report. D. Computer-created maps showing eye-level and 50-foot high visibility potential of various locations related to possible mining activities. (Figure 43 in report shows the relative positions of these points), 254 E. 1. Scientific and common names of plants referred to in the Henry Mountains coal field EMRIA study, 274 2. A hypothetical list of common and scientific names of fauna of the Henry Mountains taken from Durrant (1952), Behle et al (1975) and Stebbins (1966). 275 IV LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Yearly visitation totals at selected national parks, monuments in the Western United States, 30 2. Actual and predicted precipitation at various elevations in the Henry Mountains coal region. (Data from Henry Mts. Unit Resource Analysis, BLM). 37 3. Monthly precipitation at various locations in the Henry Mountains Planning Unit (Computed by B,L,M, from U,S. Weather Bureau Data). 38 4. Years with below or above average pre- cipitation at Hanksville, Utah (Eleva- tion 4300 ft.; 1931-42 and 1945-72). 39 5. Monthly temperatures at various locations in the Henry Mountains Planning Unit (computed from U.S. Weather Bureau Data by BLM). 40 6. Generalized section of sedimentary rocks exposed in the Henry Mountains region, 47 7. Description of surface section of Pete Steele Bench escarpment as measured in two segments north of the road in SW 1/4 Sec. 19 (T 31 S R 9 E), Measurements by handlevel, Section starts on top of prominent white sandstone ledge in coal section. For particle size analysis of surface samples, see the following table, 56 8. Particle size analysis of samples collected on surface section. Determinations were made in USU soils laboratory, 57 9. Lithology of geologic cores according to percentage of rock types in cores. Order of location is from west to east at study site. 58 10. Chemical analyses of drill core samples and soil surface samples from field sites. 67 V Table Page 11. Top yields of Russian wildrye after 60 days growth 1n the greenhouse on crushed drill core samples and soils surface materials from the Henry Mountains coal field, 73 12. Depth of sampled coal and thickness of sampled beds. 79 13. Classifications of soils and map symbols used, 81 14. Soil legend. 82 15. Analytical data from major soils in the vicinity of Pete Steele Bench and Wildcat Mesa. 86 16. A general assessment of the soils described in the Henry Mountains resource area soil survey for properties important to land rehabilitation, 87 17. Suitability ratings of soils as plant growth media for distrubed land rehabilitation. 88 18. Suitability of soils for rehabilitation (See Table 13 for explanation of suitability ratings), 90 19. Percent survival of transplants on six field sites after five months (Planted April 14, 1977). 99 20. A comparison of growth in greenhouse and field survival of Russian wildrye on surface outcrop materials and soils of the Henry Mountains coal field study area, 101 21. Ground cover estimates for vegetation types adjacent to reclamation study sites within the Coal Lease Block Steele Butte Allotment Henry Mountain Resource Area, 1977, Data are from Bureau of Land Management, Allot- ment Management Plan, 105 22. Water quality parameters in the Colorado River Basin evaluated from storet data, 110 VI Table Page 23. Nevada range! and communities for which erosion rate estimates are available (Trieste 1977), 117 24. Site characteristics for mined areas in Utah for which soil erosion data exist. 118 25. Site characteristics for mined areas in Utah. 119 26. List of locations of chained and unchained pi nyon- juniper communities in central and southern Utah for which soil erosion estimates exist. 120 27. Different geologic types for which soil erosion data exist. 121 28. Records of selected wells that draw water from Navajo sandstone, Henry Mountains area. 132 29. Chemical analyses of five wells in Henry Mountains showing the range of values reported. 134 30. Infiltration rates (f ) by geologic-soil types. 28 minute infiltrometer runs of 2 1/2 ft .2 plots, summer, 1975 in the Price River Basin, Utah. 137 31. Range vegetation types and conditions on Steele Butte Allotment. 156 32. Recreational use of National Parks Service parks and campgrounds in the Henry Mountain region (Data from Agency 1976 Recreation Reports.) 162 33. Suitability of various plant species for rehabilitation of the Henry Mountains coal field. 184 B-l USGS sample number, hole number,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Core Study Unearths Insights Into Uinta Basin Evolution and Resources
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SURVEY NOTES VOLUME 51, NUMBER 2 MAY 2019 New core study unearths insights into Uinta Basin evolution and resources CONTENTS New Core, New Insights into Ancient DIRECTOR’S PERSPECTIVE Lake Uinta Evolution and Uinta Basin • Exploration and development of Energy Resources ..........................1 by Bill Keach unconventional resources. Oil shale Drones for Good: Utah Geologists As the incoming Take to the Skies ...........................3 director for the Utah and sand continue to be a provocative Utah Mining Districts at Your Fingertips . .4 Geological Survey opportunity still searching for an eco- Energy News: The Benefits of Utah (UGS), I would like to nomic threshold. Oil and Gas Production.....................6 thank Rick Allis for his Glad You Asked: What are Those • Earthquake early warning systems. Can Blue Ponds Near Moab?....................8 guidance and leader- they work on the Wasatch Front? GeoSights: Pine Park and Ancient ship over the past 18 years. In Rick’s first • Incorporating technology into field Supervolcanoes of Southwestern Utah....10 “Director’s Perspective” he made predic- Survey News...............................12 tions of “likely hot-button issues” that the mapping and hazard recognition and UGS would face. These issues included: using data analytics and knowledge Design | Jenny Erickson sharing in our work at the UGS. Cover | View to the west of Willow Creek • Renewed exploration for oil and gas in core study area. Photo by Ryan Gall. the State. The last item is dear to my heart. A large part of my career has been in the devel- State of Utah • Renewed interest in more fossil-fuel-fired Gary R.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Browns Canyon National Monument
    BLM Mission The Bureau of Land Management's mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. USFS Mission The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. BLM/CO/PL-20/008 Cover photo credit: Logan Myers Browns Canyon National Monument Proposed Resource Management Plan / Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2: Appendices Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office Cañon City, Colorado and U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands Salida, Colorado April 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A. Bibliography Appendix B. Glossary Appendix C. Key Word Index Appendix D. Maps Appendix E. Laws, Regulations, Policies, Guidance, and Monument Resources, Objects, and Values Appendix F. Consultation and Coordination Appendix G. Best Management Practices Reference List Appendix H. Updated Evaluation of Relevance and Importance Criteria Appendix I. Wild and Scenic River Study Appendix J. Cumulative Impact Methodology and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Appendix K. Mitigation Strategy, Adaptive Management, and Monitoring Measures Appendix L. Management Zones Frameworks for Recreation and Visitor Services Appendix M. USFS Wilderness Inventory Suitability Determination Appendix N. Draft RMP/EIS Comment Analysis Report Browns Canyon National Monument i Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2020 Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service U.S
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 ON THE COVER Bison bull at southeastern Utah's Henry Mountains Photograph by Utah Division of Wildlife Resources DOI Bison Report Looking Forward Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/BRMD/NRR—2014/821 Prepared by the Department of the Interior Bison Leadership Team and Working Group National Park Service Biological Resource Management Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 200 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 June 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Bull Mountain Wilderness Study Area, Garfield and Wayne Counties, Utah
    Mineral Resources of the Bull Mountain Wilderness Study Area, Garfield and Wayne Counties, Utah U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1751-B Chapter B Mineral Resources of the Bull Mountain Wilderness Study Area, Garfield and Wayne Counties, Utah By RUSSELL F. DUBIEL, CALVIN S. BROMFIELD, STANLEY E. CHURCH, WILLIAM M. KEMP, MARK J. LARSON, and FRED PETERSON U.S. Geological Survey JOHN T. NEUBERT U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1751 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- HENRY MOUNTAINS REGION, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mineral resources of the Bull Mountain Wilderness Study Area, Garfield and Wayne Counties, Utah. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas Henry Mountains Region, Utah ; ch. B) (Studies related to wilderness) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1751) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1751-8 1. Mines and mineral resources Utah Bull Mountain Wilderness. 2. Bull Mountain Wilderness (Utah) I. Dubiel, Russell F. II. Series. III. Series: Studies related to wilderness wilderness areas. IV. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1751-B. QE75.B9 no. 1751-B 557.3s 87-600433 [TN24.U8] [553'.09792'52] [TN24.C6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayne County, Utah Resource Management Plan
    DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017 Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 1 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 Prologue Wayne County is a unique and beautiful place steeped in pioneer heritage and culture. The hearty souls that settled this county and their generations of offspring to follow, have a rich history of making a living utilizing the public lands within it. The early settlers and those that followed, up until the 1970’s, had no idea the government would start locking up land, limiting their access and use of the land. It could be said we have all been naïve while bit by bit land has been taken from our reach and set aside in monuments, parks, recreation areas, wilderness study areas, wilderness characteristic areas, roadless areas, and other designations. All land uses except recreation have been almost entirely eliminated, and that has been limited and controlled to the point that some people are completely prevented from visiting some areas. This elimination of use has severely affected the livelihoods, families, economics, and entire lives of those who have remained and tried to raise families in the county. The slow choking out and change to a seasonal and recreational economy is devastating. As kids move away, farms and ranching operations are sold, houses are sold for second homes or short term rentals, and tourists flock in, good traditional jobs, and families disappear. It can be said that almost everything that sustains life comes from the earth, except sun light.
    [Show full text]
  • January 30, 2019 the Honorable Betsy Devos Secretary Department
    January 30, 2019 The Honorable Betsy DeVos Secretary Department of Education 400 Maryland Avenue Washington, DC 20202 via electronic submission Re: Docket No. ED-2018-OCR-0064, RIN 1870-AA14, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance Dear Secretary DeVos: Title IX is essential to ensuring that our schools are free from discrimination, including sexual harassment and violence. But the Department of Education’s proposed changes would weaken students’ Title IX protections by narrowing the definition of sexual harassment to potentially exclude much of the abuse students experience and by limiting when schools will respond to reports of sexual harassment and violence. In addition, the rule would put in place school processes that make it harder for students to come forward and receive the support they need when they experience sexual harassment or assault. These changes would ultimately make our schools less safe. As Secretary of Education, you have the power to address this critical civil rights issue and help make schools safer and more equitable for all students. I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in urging you to withdraw the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Title IX and to work to ensure schools protect students from sex discrimination by fully enforcing, not rolling back, Title IX’s protections. Signed, Dr. Rachel B. Aarons Las Encinas Road Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Marilyn Abariotes 2222 Jackson St. Blair, NE 68008 Alexandra Abel 17014 Berendo Ave Unit C Gardena, CA 90247 Ms. Olga Abella 12129 N 675th St Robinson, IL 62454 Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Ridge Wilderness Indigenous Fish And
    a Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture In Partnership with Western Colorado University Indigenous Fish and Wildlife Management Strategy Fossil Ridge Wilderness, Gunnison National Forest “Like winds and sunsets, wild things were taken for granted until progress began to do away with them. Now we face the question whether a still higher ‘standard of living’ is worth its cost in things natural, wild, and free.” – Aldo Leopold Indigenous Fish and Wildlife Management Strategy Fossil Ridge Wilderness, Gunnison National Forest Tobias Nickel Wilderness Fellow Master in Environmental Management (MEM) Candidate [email protected] October 2020 Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Gunnison Ranger District 216 N. Colorado St. Gunnison, CO 81230 Western Colorado University The Center for Public Lands 1 Western Way Gunnison, CO 81231 ON THE FRONT COVER Top: Henry Mountain, the highest point in the wilderness at 13,254 feet, as seen from an expansive, subalpine grassland meadow along the Van Tuyl Trail (Tobias Nickel, July 4, 2020) Middle left: Bighorn ram (CPW) Middle right: Southern white-tailed ptarmigan in fall plumage (Shawn Conner, BIO-Logic, Inc.) Bottom left: Colorado River cutthroat trout (Photo © Alyssa Anduiza, courtesy of Aspiring Wild) Bottom right: Adult boreal toad (Brad Lambert, CNHP) ON THE BACK COVER The shores of Henry Lake in the heart of the Fossil Ridge Wilderness. Rising to over 13,000 feet, the granite peaks of the Fossil Ridge tower in the background (Tobias Nickel, June 16, 2020) ii iii Dedication This publication is dedicated to all past, present, and future defenders of wilderness. Your efforts safeguard the Earth’s wild treasures from our species’ most destructive tendencies and demonstrate that humility and restraint are possible in an age of overconsumption and unfettered development.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological and Distributional Analysis of Great Basin Bristlecone Pine (Pinus Longaeva)
    An Ecological and Distributional Analysis of Great Basin Bristlecone Pine (Pinus longaeva) Gregory Watson Taylor A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Steven L. Petersen, Chair Loreen A. Flinders Stanley G. Kitchen Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2018 Gregory Watson Taylor All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT An Ecological and Distributional Analysis of Great Basin Bristlecone Pine (Pinus longaeva) Gregory Watson Taylor Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, BYU Master of Science Understanding the impacts of climate change is critical for improving the conservation and management of ecosystems worldwide. Ecosystems vary along a precipitation and temperature gradient, ranging from tropical jungles to arid deserts. The Great Basin is a semi- arid eco-region that is found within the western United States. Plant communities within the Great Basin range from sagebrush valleys to sub-alpine conifer forests found at high elevation areas. It is predicted that the Great Basin will experience prolonged periods of drought, more intense fires, and greater variability in average annual and monthly precipitation, all in response to changes in climate patterns. At the lower elevations, sagebrush communities are expected to experience less suitable habitat conditions, however, less is understood about vegetation response at upper elevations. Understanding forest composition and structure at these upper elevations within the Great Basin will help us better understand potential impacts from climate change. In chapter 1, we characterized Pinus longaeva (Great Basin bristlecone pine D.K. Bailey) forest structure and composition. We mapped this tree species distribution and characterized forest structure and composition using a sampling protocol that included both biophysical variables and individual tree characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Area and the Grizzly Peak Caldera, Sa Watch Range, Central Colorado
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE COLLEGIATE PEAKS WILDERNESS AREA AND THE GRIZZLY PEAK CALDERA, SAWATCH RANGE, CENTRAL COLORADO By C.J. Fridrich, Ed DeWitt, Bruce Bryant, Steve Richard, and R.P. Smith Pamphlet to accompany MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS SERIES MAPI-2565 1998 CONTENTS Explanatory notes 1 Description of Map Units 1 Acknowledgments 26 References Cited 26 FIGURES 3. Summary geochemical diagrams for rocks of the Grizzly Peak caldera. 2 4. Summary geochemical diagrams for Cretaceous and Tertiary intrusive rocks in the Aspen area. 6 5. Summary geochemical diagrams for the Italian Mountain intrusive complex. 7 6. Summary geochemical diagrams for altered intrusive rocks at Middle Mountain and Winfield Peak. 8 7. Summary geochemical diagrams for rocks of the Mount Champion area. 9 8. Summary geochemical diagrams for intrusive rocks of the Mount Princeton Pluton. 10 9. Summary geochemical diagrams for intrusive rocks of the Twin Lakes Pluton. 11 10. 40Ar- 39Ar release spectra for hornblende from sample R8-28-84-4 of mafic border of Twin Lakes pluton. Width of bars on spectra is 2-sigma uncertainty. 13 11. Summary geochemical diagrams for Cretaceous plutons east of the Twin Lakes pluton. 15 12. Summary geochemical diagrams for 1.4-Ga plutons and plutons assumed to be 1.4 Gain the central Sawatch Range area. 17 13. Concordia diagram for zircon from sample IC-6 of the St. Kevin Granite. Size of symbol represents 2-sigma analytical uncertainty. 18 14. Summary geochemical diagrams for some 1.65-Ga and older plutons in the central Sawatch Range area.
    [Show full text]
  • Ccommittee on Revisit Board on Div Ting Bruce N Agricultu Vision on E
    Committee on Revisiting Brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Area Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources Division on Earth and Life Studies A Report of THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This study was supported by Grant #14-9795-2254-GR between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-45831-3 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-45831-5 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/24750 Additional copies of this publication are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2017 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Cover photo courtesy of Mark Gocke, Wyoming Game and Fish Department. Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Revisiting Brucellosis in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/24750. The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by Presi- dent Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to sci- ence and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Richfield Interagency Fire Center 2014 ANNUAL FIRE REPORT
    Richfield Interagency Fire Center 2014 ANNUAL FIRE REPORT US Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Fishlake National Forest U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Color Country District, Richfield Field Office West Desert District, Fillmore Field Office Bureau of Indian Affairs Southern Piute Field Station National Park Service Capitol Reef U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish Springs National Wildlife Refuge State of Utah Department of Forestry, Fire & State Lands Central Area Office 1830 S Industrial Park Rd – Richfield, UT 84701 INTRODUCTION The Richfield Interagency Fire Center (RIFC) is located in central Utah. The response area of RIFC consists of over 11 million acres including the Fishlake National Forest, BLM Fillmore Field Office, BLM Richfield Field Office, Capitol Reef National Park, Fish Springs National Wildlife Refuge, Central Area of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, and the BIA Southern Piute Field Station. Eight counties are included within the jurisdiction boundaries: Juab, Millard, Sevier, Sanpete, Piute, Wayne, Garfield and Beaver. Interstate highways I-15 and I-70 transect through the area as well as major highways. The terrain includes the Great Basin Desert, the Colorado Plateau, fertile valleys, and high mountain ecosystems. Elevations range from approximately 4,000 to over 12,000 feet. Listed below is the total acreage responsibility of Richfield Interagency Fire Center and each agency’s ownership acres. BLM Forest National Fish & State BIA DOD Service Park Wildlife
    [Show full text]