DOCSLIB.ORG

Wayne County, Utah Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wayne County, Utah Resource Management Plan DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2017 Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 1 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 Prologue Wayne County is a unique and beautiful place steeped in pioneer heritage and culture. The hearty souls that settled this county and their generations of offspring to follow, have a rich history of making a living utilizing the public lands within it. The early settlers and those that followed, up until the 1970’s, had no idea the government would start locking up land, limiting their access and use of the land. It could be said we have all been naïve while bit by bit land has been taken from our reach and set aside in monuments, parks, recreation areas, wilderness study areas, wilderness characteristic areas, roadless areas, and other designations. All land uses except recreation have been almost entirely eliminated, and that has been limited and controlled to the point that some people are completely prevented from visiting some areas. This elimination of use has severely affected the livelihoods, families, economics, and entire lives of those who have remained and tried to raise families in the county. The slow choking out and change to a seasonal and recreational economy is devastating. As kids move away, farms and ranching operations are sold, houses are sold for second homes or short term rentals, and tourists flock in, good traditional jobs, and families disappear. It can be said that almost everything that sustains life comes from the earth, except sun light. Life as we know it, and especially with increasing population, cannot and will not go on without an increase in use of and products from the earth. Renewable energy is really not renewable, it requires products mined from the earth to make solar panels or wind mills which periodically need to be replaced which requires more mined products from the earth. As more and more land in the county is locked up, more of everything that sustains life must be transported in. Carry this scenario to the extreme and the result is a place none of us would want. This Resource Management Plan is an effort to outline how the majority of Wayne County residents would like the public lands that surround us managed. Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 2 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need……………………………………………………...4 Chapter 2 - Land Use and Land Access…………………………………………..12 Chapter 3 - Livestock, Grazing and Agriculture………………………………….21 Chapter 4 - Geological and Paleontological Resources ………………………….92 Chapter 5 - Irrigation, Water Rights, Ditches and Canals ……………………….95 Chapter 6 - Mining, Mineral and Energy Development…………………………100 Chapter 7 - Forest and Fire Management ……………………………………….109 Chapter 8 - Noxious Weeds ……………………………………………………..127 Chapter 9 - Hydrology, Water Quality, River Terraces and Flood Plains ………138 Chapter 10 - Riparian Areas and Wetlands ……………………………………..155 Chapter 11 - Wildlife, Fisheries and Predator Control ………………………….166 Chapter 12 – Recreation and Tourism …………………………………………..185 Chapter 13 - Cultural and Historical Resources ………………………………...198 Chapter 14 - Wilderness and Related Special Designations …………………….215 Chapter 15 - Wild and Scenic Rivers …………………………………………...238 Chapter 16 – Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species ………………….240 Chapter 17 - Law Enforcement …………………………………………………250 Chapter 18 - Air Quality ………………………………………………………..253 Chapter 19 - Economic Considerations …………………………………………263 Chapter 20 – Broadband ………………………………………………………..266 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….275 List of Appendices………………………………………………………………291 List of Maps……………………………………………………………………..292 Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 3 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 Wayne County Resource Management Plan Chapter 1 Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction Wayne County has developed a resource management plan (RMP) as required by Utah House Bill 323, which requires a county to develop a RMP (H.B. 323, 2015 General Session). The RMP will be part of the county’s existing general plan. H.B. 323 has established the content requirements for a county’s RMP. The requirements of H.B. 323 was amended in the 2016 legislative session by H.B. 219. Utah State Statute directs the development of county-level plans. Section 17-27a-401 of the Utah Code provides: “…each County shall prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long range general plan.” Specific components which are required to be addressed within these plans include: land use, transportation, environmental issues, public services and facilities, rehabilitation and redevelopment, economic concerns, recommendations for plan implementation, and "any other elements that the county considers appropriate". In 2015, the Utah Legislature amended Title 17-27a-401 to also require that County General Plans include a Resource Management Plan to provide a basis for communicating and coordinating with the federal government on land planning and resource management issues. This Resource Management Plan is the fulfillment of those requirements. In 2016, HB 219 resulted in amendments to Title 17-27a-401, 403, 404, also 63J-4-607. Pursuant to HB323/219 and Title 17-27a, Wayne County prepared and adopted a comprehensive, long-range general plan for present and future needs of the county; for growth and development of all or any part of the land within the unincorporated portions of the county; and as a basis for communicating and coordinating with the federal government on land and resource management issues. In addition, Title 17-27a-401(3) (a) the general plan shall contain a RMP for public lands within the county. (b) Specifically the RMP shall address: (A) mining; (B) land use; (C) livestock and grazing; (D) irrigation; (E) agriculture; (F) fire management; (G) noxious weeds; Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 4 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 (H) forest management; (I) water rights; (J) ditches and canals; (K) water quality and hydrology; (L) flood plains and river terraces; (M) wetlands; (N) riparian areas; (O) predator control; (P) wildlife; (Q) fisheries; (R) recreation and tourism; (S) energy resources; (T) mineral resources; (U) cultural, historical, geological, and paleontological resources; (V) wilderness; (W) wild and scenic rivers; (X) threatened, endangered, and sensitive species; (Y) land access; (Z) law enforcement; and (AA) economic considerations. (AB) air quality Wayne County is located in south central Utah, lying within the Colorado Plateau. The Fremont River flows into the county from Fish Lake in Sevier County and then east converging with the Muddy River to form the Dirty Devil River which then flows south into the Colorado River in Garfield County. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM); United States Forest Service (FS) including the Dixie and Fishlake National Forests; the National Park Service (NPS) including Capitol Reef National Park, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Horseshoe Canyon, Canyonlands National Park; and State lands manage large amounts of land in the county. BLM- 891,978 acres or 56.54 % Forest Service- 160,080 acres or 10.14 % National Park Service- 199,589 acres or 12.65 % National Recreation Area- 88,170 acres or 6.22 % State of Utah- 169,159 acres or 10.72 % Private Lands- 57,721acres or 3.65 % A land use plan must be based on the goals, objectives and values as well as on objective scientific, economic or legal bases. The goals and desired conditions used by the federal agencies are shaped by values of interest groups, their own personnel, and some scientists to achieve their Wayne County Resource Management Plan Page 5 DRAFT Document for Public Review May 1, 2017 desired conditions. These may not always be the same as those of the local residents, and some of the science used to support these views is usually open to different interpretation. 1.2 County Goals Wayne County has a responsibility to the citizens of the county, to landowners in the county, and to the people who visit the county for business or recreation, to: 1. Protect and expand the tax base and level of economic activity in the county to provide a good standard of living and county services for its residents. 2. Provide for the health and safety of the residents of and visitors to the county. 3. Provide a quality environment for the enjoyment and use of its citizens, including protection of local values and lifestyles. 4. Protect and improve the natural environment, including wildlife, plant life, soils, water, and air for the benefit of current and future generations. 5. Represent the interests of its residents in coordinating the planning, management, and regulatory activities of other local, state and federal agencies. A General Plan for Wayne County was completed in May 1994, as an effort on the part of the citizens of Wayne County to define the values and the goals of the county and to identify the means by which to meet those goals. In addition, a Wayne County Resource Management Plan was completed in January of 2011. This plan will address each of the resources named above. 1.3 General Positions of Wayne County 1.3.1 Adaptive Management Forest Service and BLM policy is to employ an adaptive management approach to management of the federal lands. In essence, this approach involves defining objectives, planning and implementing management designed to reach objectives, monitoring to see if progress is being made, and adjusting plans as required if not. The County supports this approach. However, the county also believes that Forest Service and BLM too often subvert this approach by setting rigid guidelines or restrictions both in general land management plans, leasing plans, and specific allotment management plans. Rigidly enforced guidelines on forage utilization, grazing dates, acceptable land treatments, and other practices restrict flexibility and case by case decision making which are fundamental to the concept of adaptive management. The county believes that management plans should concentrate on the desired results of the plan and provide for flexibility, innovation, and site specific monitoring to achieve those objectives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capitol Reef National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping
    Geologic Resources Inventory Workshop Summary Capitol Reef National Park September 27-28, 1999 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division and Natural Resources Information Division Version: Draft of November 5, 1999 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An inventory workshop was held at Capitol Reef NP on September 27-28, 1999 to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, to address the status of geologic mapping by both the Utah Geological Survey (UGS) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for compiling both paper and digital maps, and to assess resource management issues and needs. Cooperators from the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD), Natural Resources Information Division (NRID), Capitol Reef NP, UGS, USGS, and Brigham Young University (BYU) were present for the two-day workshop. (See Appendix A, Capitol Reef NP Geological Resources Inventory Workshop Participants, September 27-28, 1999) Z:\Scoping\scoping_summaries\CARE_scoping_summary_19991105.doc Last printed 11/28/2006 12:16:00 PM Page 1 of 18 Capitol Reef NP GRI Workshop Summary: September 27-28, 1999 (cont'd) Day one involved a field trip throughout the northern extent of Capitol Reef NP co-led by USGS geologists Pete Peterson and George Billingsley. Highlights of the field trip can be found at http://www.nature.nps.gov/grd/geology/gri/ut/care/field_trip_care Day two involved a scoping session to present overviews of the NPS Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) program, the Geologic Resources Division, and the ongoing Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) for Colorado and Utah. Round table discussions involving geologic issues for Capitol Reef NP included interpretation, soils mapping, paleontologic resources, the UGA Millennium 2000 guidebook featuring the geology of Utah's National and State parks, the status of cooperative geologic mapping efforts, sources of available data, geologic hazards, potential future research topics, and action items generated from this meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • New Core Study Unearths Insights Into Uinta Basin Evolution and Resources
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SURVEY NOTES VOLUME 51, NUMBER 2 MAY 2019 New core study unearths insights into Uinta Basin evolution and resources CONTENTS New Core, New Insights into Ancient DIRECTOR’S PERSPECTIVE Lake Uinta Evolution and Uinta Basin • Exploration and development of Energy Resources ..........................1 by Bill Keach unconventional resources. Oil shale Drones for Good: Utah Geologists As the incoming Take to the Skies ...........................3 director for the Utah and sand continue to be a provocative Utah Mining Districts at Your Fingertips . .4 Geological Survey opportunity still searching for an eco- Energy News: The Benefits of Utah (UGS), I would like to nomic threshold. Oil and Gas Production.....................6 thank Rick Allis for his Glad You Asked: What are Those • Earthquake early warning systems. Can Blue Ponds Near Moab?....................8 guidance and leader- they work on the Wasatch Front? GeoSights: Pine Park and Ancient ship over the past 18 years. In Rick’s first • Incorporating technology into field Supervolcanoes of Southwestern Utah....10 “Director’s Perspective” he made predic- Survey News...............................12 tions of “likely hot-button issues” that the mapping and hazard recognition and UGS would face. These issues included: using data analytics and knowledge Design | Jenny Erickson sharing in our work at the UGS. Cover | View to the west of Willow Creek • Renewed exploration for oil and gas in core study area. Photo by Ryan Gall. the State. The last item is dear to my heart. A large part of my career has been in the devel- State of Utah • Renewed interest in more fossil-fuel-fired Gary R.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Valley Loop @
    Cathedral Valley Loop @ www.ontdek-amerika.nl Last Update : Januari 27, 2007 Cathedral Valley Loop INLEIDING Cathedral Valley ligt in het uiterste noorden van Capitol Reef National Park, en is alleen via onverharde wegen bereikbaar. Een van de meest opvallende kenmerken is de aanwezigheid van veel schitterende monolieten, dat zijn apart staande rotsen die hoog boven de omgeving uitsteken. Het woord monoliet is afgeleid van de Griekse woorden ‘monos’ (alleen) en ‘lithos’ (gesteente). Je kan het zeer eenzame gebied – er komen hier maar héél weinig bezoekers – bereiken via de Hartnet Road en de Caineville Wash Road, die samen een 58 mijl lange lus vormen. Via diverse korte zijwegen kan je naar een aantal punten rijden die een panoramisch uitzicht bieden over de weidse omgeving. De route valt deels binnen de parkgrenzen; het deel dat niet tot het park behoort wordt beheerd door het Bureau of Landmanagement. De beste jaargetijden om de Cathedral Valley Loop te rijden zijn de lente en de herfst. Tijdens de winter is de weg vaak te slecht, en tijdens de zomer kan het ondraaglijk heet worden. TOESTAND VAN DE WEG In principe is de weg het hele jaar door open. Vierwielaandrijving is meestal niet nodig, maar een hoge bodemvrijheid (high clearance) is wel absoluut noodzakelijk. Bij goede weersomstandigheden is de weg goed berijdbaar, maar bij slecht weer kan de toestand van de weg drastisch veranderen. Regen en sneeuw kunnen delen van de route onbegaanbaar maken. Informeer daarom altijd vooraf bij het Visitor Center in Capitol Reef National Park naar de conditie van de weg én naar de weersvoorspelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Yanawant: Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip
    Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two OfOfOf The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared by Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines December 12, 2005 Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two Of The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared for Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Strip Field Office St. George, Utah Prepared by: Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines Report of work carried out under contract number #AAA000011TOAAF030023 2 Table of Contents Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………ii i Chapter One: Southern Paiute History on the Arizona Strip………………………………...1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Early Southern Paiute Contact with Europeans and Euroamericans ........................... 5 1.2 Southern Paiutes and Mormons ........................................................................................ 8 1.3 The Second Powell Expedition......................................................................................... 13 1.4 An Onslaught of Cattle and Further Mormon Expansion............................................ 16 1.5 Interactions in the First Half of the 20 th Century ......................................................... 26 Chapter Two: Southern Paiute Place Names On and Near the Arizona Strip 37 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Browns Canyon National Monument
    BLM Mission The Bureau of Land Management's mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. USFS Mission The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. BLM/CO/PL-20/008 Cover photo credit: Logan Myers Browns Canyon National Monument Proposed Resource Management Plan / Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2: Appendices Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office Cañon City, Colorado and U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Pike and San Isabel National Forests and Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands Salida, Colorado April 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A. Bibliography Appendix B. Glossary Appendix C. Key Word Index Appendix D. Maps Appendix E. Laws, Regulations, Policies, Guidance, and Monument Resources, Objects, and Values Appendix F. Consultation and Coordination Appendix G. Best Management Practices Reference List Appendix H. Updated Evaluation of Relevance and Importance Criteria Appendix I. Wild and Scenic River Study Appendix J. Cumulative Impact Methodology and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Appendix K. Mitigation Strategy, Adaptive Management, and Monitoring Measures Appendix L. Management Zones Frameworks for Recreation and Visitor Services Appendix M. USFS Wilderness Inventory Suitability Determination Appendix N. Draft RMP/EIS Comment Analysis Report Browns Canyon National Monument i Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2020 Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • English Information
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park … the light seems to flow or shine out of the rock rather than to be reflected English from it. – Clarence Dutton, geologist and early explorer of Capitol Reef, 1880s A Wrinkle in the Earth A vibrant palette of color spills across the landscape before bridges, and twisting canyons. Over millions of years geologic forces you. The hues are constantly changing, altered by the play shaped, lifted, and folded the earth, creating this rugged, remote area of light against the towering cliffs, massive domes, arches, known as the Waterpocket Fold. Panorama Point at Sunset Erosion creates waterpockets and potholes that collect The Castle is made of fractured Wingate Sandstone perched upon grey Chinle and red Moenkopi Formations. rainwater and snowmelt, enhancing a rich ecosystem. From the east, the Waterpocket Fold appears as a formidable barrier Capitol Dome reminded early travelers of the US Capitol to travel, much like a barrier reef in an ocean. building and later inspired the name of the park. Creating the Waterpocket Fold Capitol Reef’s defining geologic feature is a wrinkle in Uplift: Between 50 and 70 million years ago, an ancient fault was Earth’s crust, extending nearly 100 miles from Thousand reactivated during a time of tectonic activity, lifting the layers to the Lake Mountain to Lake Powell. It was created over time by west of the fault over 7,000 feet higher than those to the east. Rather three gradual, yet powerful processes—deposition, uplift, than cracking, the rock layers folded over the fault line.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Stratigraphy Column
    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geology “Geology knows no such word as forever.” —Wallace Stegner Capitol Reef National Park’s geologic story reveals a nearly complete set of Mesozoic-era sedimentary layers. For 200 million years, rock layers formed at or near sea level. About 75-35 million years ago tectonic forces uplifted them, forming the Waterpocket Fold. Forces of erosion have been sculpting this spectacular landscape ever since. Deposition If you could travel in time and visit Capitol Visiting Capitol Reef 180 million years ago, Reef 245 million years ago, you would not when the Navajo Sandstone was deposited, recognize the landscape. Imagine a coastal you would have been surrounded by a giant park, with beaches and tidal flats; the water sand sea, the largest in Earth’s history. In this moves in and out gently, shaping ripple marks hot, dry climate, wind blew over sand dunes, in the wet sand. This is the environment creating large, sweeping crossbeds now in which the sediments of the Moenkopi preserved in the sandstone of Capitol Dome Formation were deposited. and Fern’s Nipple. Now jump ahead 20 million years, to 225 All the sedimentary rock layers were laid million years ago. The tidal flats are gone and down at or near sea level. Younger layers were the climate supports a tropical jungle, filled deposited on top of older layers. The Moenkopi with swamps, primitive trees, and giant ferns. is the oldest layer visible from the visitor center, The water is stagnant and a humid breeze with the younger Chinle Formation above it.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Mineral Resources, Grand Staircase
    Circular 93 Utah Geological Survey Illustration Captions View figure: Circular 93 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15. A Preliminary Assessment of Energy and Table of Contents 1.Preface Mineral Resources within the Grand 2.Summary 3.Introduction Staircase - Escalante National Monument 4.Geology 5.Kaiparowits Plateau coal Compiled by M. Lee Allison, State Geologist field 6.Oil and Gas Potential Contributors: 7.Tar-sand Resources Robert E. Blackett, Editor 8.Non-fuel Minerals and Thomas C. Chidsey Jr., Oil and Gas Mining David E. Tabet, Coal and Coal-Bed Gas 9.Acknowledgments Robert W. Gloyn, Minerals 10.References Charles E. Bishop, Tar-Sands January 1997 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Background Purpose and Scope GEOLOGY Regional Structure Permian through Jurassic Stratigraphy Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy THE KAIPAROWITS PLATEAU COAL FIELD History of Mining and Exploration Coal Resources Coal Resources on School and Institutional Trust Lands Sulfur Content of Kaiparowits Coal Coal-bed Gas Resources Further Coal Resource Assessments Needed OIL AND GAS POTENTIAL Source Rocks Potential Reservoirs Trapping Mechanisms Exploration and Development Carbon Dioxide Further Oil and Gas Resource Assessments Needed TAR-SAND RESOURCES OF THE CIRCLE CLIFFS AREA NON-FUEL MINERALS AND MINING Manganese Uranium-Vanadium Zirconium-Titanium Gold Copper, Lead and Zinc Industrial and Construction Materials Mining Activity Further Non-Fuel Mineral Resource Assessments Needed ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES APPENDIX A: Presidential proclamation APPENDIX B: Summary of the coal resource of Kaiparowits Plateau and its value APPENDIX C: Summary of coal resources on School and Institutional Trust Lands APPENDIX D: Authorized Federal Oil and Gas Leases in the monument ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 ON THE COVER Water quality monitoring site ESC02 on the Escalante River in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Photography by SCPN Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 Melissa Dyer Stephen A. Monroe Stacy E. Stumpf National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network 525 S. Beaver, Building 20 PO Box 5663 Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5663 December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conserva- tion and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. Please direct any data requests to the water resources project manager or the SCPN data manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002
    Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 By Dale E. Wilberg and Bernard J. Stolp U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Salt Lake City, Utah 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2329 West Orton Circle Building 810 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Box 25286, Denver Federal Center http://ut.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 1-888-ASK-USGS iii CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]